There’s a new “human Barbie” in town. Meet Julia Vins, the 18-year-old with the face of a porcelain doll — and the body of the Hulk. Powerlifter Julia has scored thousands of fans in her native Russia for her unusual blend of wide-eyed, pretty looks and muscular physique.
The innocent-faced teenager — who likes to take topless pictures of herself — even holds three world powerlifting records.
“People know me as ‘muscle Barbie’ — I like this comparison,” says Julia. “I have these big, beautiful eyes and wear make-up. But at the same time, I’m strong. I can dead lift 400 pounds in training. I want to become as big as possible.”
Julia claims her astonishing appearance divides the opposite sex.
“Everyone has an opinion on what I look like — they either respect my work or reprimand me for being a muscly girl.
“But to be honest, I’ve noticed that the guys who are negative about my athleticism — are just jealous.”
Since childhood, Julia’s angelic face meant she’s always been compared to a pretty doll. But the naturally slender girl never felt like she had any purpose in life.
“Because of my facial features, people have always said I look like a doll.
“And I was a good, academic girl for so many years. I studied music, was well-read, participated in various school competitions and was skilled at art. But I never felt like I had any particular objective in life. My body was not in harmony with my soul — it wasn’t the right one for me.”
In an attempt to find some meaning in her life, Julia began going to the gym at age 15.
She explains: “I had no interest in sport but I was lost. I thought I might see if I could build some strength and confidence by weight training at the gym. I started copying exercises that the male gym-goers did. It did not make me strong, but then I started powerlifting. I loved it! I knew then that my goal was — to build muscle.”
A year later, Julia met a coach who saw potential in her as a weightlifter. She started training at the gym with him for three to five hours, four times per week.
Julia also transformed her diet. She now eats five to six small meals per day, which consist of chicken, eggs, cheese, rice and vegetables. But she allows herself one cheat day per week.
Finally in August 2014, Julia entered the World Powerlifting Championships in Moscow and won the competition. She achieved three world records in the sum 970 pounds — these were 400 pounds in the squat, 230 pounds in bench press and 360 pounds in the dead lift.
Julia feels it is important to look sexy even when she’s pumping iron.
“I always wear make-up, even when I’m squatting. I think it’s important to look attractive in any situation. I make sure my hair is done up in cute plaits and ribbons. I like fashion too but it’s very difficult to find nice clothes as my size is not standard.”
Julia says her parents prefer not to get involved with her career. But her 29-year-old boyfriend, Sergei, likes to weightlift with her.
“My mom and dad don’t like to interfere with my life but Sergei is very hands-on. For me, there is no limit. I want to become as muscly as possible. Many people have tried to knock me down but my training has made me strong — both physically and mentally. I’m no ordinary doll. I hope everyone finds their true calling in life like I did. I don’t like to think of what I would have become if I wasn’t muscle Barbie.”
Julia claims her astonishing appearance divides the opposite sex. “Everyone has an opinion on what I look like — they either respect my work or reprimand me for being a muscly girl. “But to be honest, I’ve noticed that the guys who are negative about my athleticism — are just jealous.”
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Since childhood, Julia’s angelic face meant she’s always been compared to a pretty doll. But the naturally slender girl never felt like she had any purpose in life. “Because of my facial features, people have always said I look like a doll. “And I was a good, academic girl for so many years. I studied music, was well-read, participated in various school competitions and was skilled at art. But I never felt like I had any particular objective in life. My body was not in harmony with my soul — it wasn’t the right one for me.”
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
In an attempt to find some meaning in her life, Julia began going to the gym at age 15. She explains: “I had no interest in sport but I was lost. I thought I might see if I could build some strength and confidence by weight training at the gym. I started copying exercises that the male gym-goers did. It did not make me strong, but then I started powerlifting. I loved it! I knew then that my goal was — to build muscle.”
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A year later, Julia met a coach who saw potential in her as a weightlifter. She started training at the gym with him for three to five hours, four times per week. Julia also transformed her diet. She now eats five to six small meals per day, which consist of chicken, eggs, cheese, rice and vegetables. But she allows herself one cheat day per week. Finally in August 2014, Julia entered the World Powerlifting Championships in Moscow and won the competition. She achieved three world records in the sum 970 pounds — these were 400 pounds in the squat, 230 pounds in bench press and 360 pounds in the dead lift.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Julia feels it is important to look sexy even when she’s pumping iron. “I always wear make-up, even when I’m squatting. I think it’s important to look attractive in any situation. I make sure my hair is done up in cute plaits and ribbons. I like fashion too but it’s very difficult to find nice clothes as my size is not standard.”
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Julia says her parents prefer not to get involved with her career. But her 29-year-old boyfriend, Sergei, likes to weightlift with her. “My mom and dad don’t like to interfere with my life but Sergei is very hands-on. For me, there is no limit. I want to become as muscly as possible. Many people have tried to knock me down but my training has made me strong — both physically and mentally. I’m no ordinary doll. I hope everyone finds their true calling in life like I did. I don’t like to think of what I would have become if I wasn’t muscle Barbie.”
Interview de Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, président de la République islamique d’Iran, le 22 mars 2007, par David Pujadas et Thierry Thuillier, dont un extrait avait été diffusé à l’époque sur France 2 :
Iran / Pujadas-Ahmadinejad: L'interview cachée aux français
Quand on a à faire à un raciste, un fasciste, un menteur, et un agent américano-sioniste, et, peut-être même à un sataniste, il n'y aura jamais de dialogue!
Ce journaleux, cette prostituée de la presse de propagande qui fabrique des guerres et sème la haine et la violence, est complètement ridicule. Il parle, accuse, insiste, récidive, et calomnie, mais n'écoute jamais! Moi, je lui aurais cloué le bec immédiatement, mais Ahmedinejad, de par son extrême gentillesse, a ignoré ses calomnies.
Je suis désolé, mais je ne pourrai supporter encore longtemps ce pressetitué de merde! Les premières neuf minutes d'écoute ont suffit largement! Aussi, je cesse d'écouter davantage. Quant à Ahmedinejad, je ne connais pas chef d'État plus pacifique que lui au monde!
BAFS
Dieudonné : Roland Dumas en vérité ( nouvelle vidéo exclu 20 février 2015 )
Dieudonné : Roland Dumas en vérité ( nouvelle vidéo exclu 20 février 2015 ) Dieudonné apporte son soutien à Roland Dumas et ses propos épris de bon sens. La chanteuse Joëlle Ursull est également à l’honneur, dénoncée par la ministre de maison George Pau-Langevin qui se fait queneller par Dieudonné.
Dieudonné revient également sur sa visite en Iran et sa rencontre avec Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Ce mardi 10 février, Dieudonné était en Iran afin de remettre à Mahmoud Ahmadinejad en personne une quenelle d’or pour l’ensemble de son œuvre et fêter son retour en politique, qui agace déjà les ennemis (...)
L’ex-président iranien Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a fait dimanche un retour sur la scène politique en lançant un site Internet officiel, à un peu plus d’un an des élections législatives. Le site, où l’on voit (...)
La Déclaration des Femmes est une initiative présentée par Profesionales por la Etica en Espagne, Istituto di Studi Superiori della Donna en Italie, Woman Attitude en Belgique et Femina Europa en France.
Notre but est de faire savoir aux institutions internationales et aux politiques ce que veulent vraiment les femmes.
La Déclaration comporte 10 affirmations et 5 demandes concernant l’identité féminine, le gender et la maternité. Traduite en sept langues, elle est déjà soutenue par une centaine d’ONG*à travers le monde. Vous pouvez la trouver et la signer ici.
Nous avons l’intention de la présenter le 8 mars, journée internationale de la femme, à Bruxelles. Pour casser la mise en œuvre de l’idéologie du gender et les politiques qui se retournent contre la femme, nous avons besoin d’un soutien massif, nous avons besoin de votre signature. Et si vous êtes un homme, trouvez une femme qui signera ! Car le vrai féminisme c’est aussi bon pour l’identité masculine !
Faites entendre au monde la voix des femmes, SIGNEZ et faites passer ! Merci !
Déclaration
Nous, femmes de tous les pays du monde, affirmons solennellement que :
I. La femme et l’homme, pour leur propre bonheur, le bien de la société tout entière et la survie de l’humanité, sont faits pour une relation réciproque fondée sur la reconnaissance, le respect, et la valorisation de leurs différences. II. L’identité féminine déploie son potentiel en complémentarité et en réciprocité avec celle de l’homme. III. La femme contribue d’une manière unique à la stabilité de la famille, de l’entreprise, de la société et au bien commun. IV. Le rôle de la femme dans la société doit être encouragé sans discrimination, violence ou exploitation et reconnu comme un enjeu pour notre temps. V. La maternité possède une valeur et une dignité intrinsèques. VI. En Occident les femmes sont discriminées du fait de leur dimension maternelle. VII. La maternité est un atout pour la femme dans le monde du travail et un investissement pour la société tout entière. VIII. La maternité et la consécration de la femme à sa famille, loin d’entraver son développement personnel, renforcent et développent son identité féminine. IX. Le travail invisible et non marchand consacré à la famille possède une valeur sociale et économique. X. Pour être véritable, l’émancipation de la femme est tout simplement la liberté d’être une femme, en tant que telle.
En conséquence, nous demandons : 1 - La reconnaissance universelle et le respect de l’identité féminine, de sa dignité, et de la véritable égalité entre l’homme et la femme dans la complémentarité et la réciprocité. 2 – La conciliation entre la vie familiale et la vie professionnelle par des mesures internationales assurant la liberté de choix des femmes. 3- La reconnaissance universelle par la législation internationale de la valeur du travail invisible et non marchand effectué par les femmes au sein de leur famille. Ces femmes doivent être désignées par le secteur économique comme le groupe des « gestionnaires de famille ». 4- Un ensemble de mesures politiques dédié à la protection des femmes salariées qui veulent avoir des enfants, ainsi que de celles qui se consacrent exclusivement ou en partie au soin de leur famille et à la prévention des discriminations à leur encontre. 5- L’interdiction universelle de la Gestation Pour Autrui. La GPA est une violation de la dignité de la mère et de l’enfant. C’est une nouvelle forme d’exploitation des femmes et de traite des êtres humains qui fait de l’enfant un objet de contrat.
Le projet de loi-cadre « Égalité hommes-femmes » est actuellement en deuxième lecture au Sénat [article publié il y a 4 mois, NDLR], avec une opposition minime. L’opinion publique en connaît les points (...)
Critique de la proposition de loi-cadre Egalité Femmes-Hommes
Le projet de loi-cadre « Égalité Hommes-Femmes » est actuellement en deuxième lecture au Sénat, avec une opposition minime. L’opinion publique en connaît les points les plus médiatisés : réforme du congé parental et droit à l’avortement perçu comme conquête ultime du le combat des femmes pour la libre disposition de leur corps. Il a pourtant une envergure et une ambition bien plus vaste, et touchera à divers titres l’ensemble de nos codes juridiques.
Un texte d’une telle portée requiert une réflexion globale sur la société et la place des femmes en son sein, en vue du bien de l’ensemble du corps social. Or, ce projet de loi ne répond pas à cette exigence. Hors les quelques mesures concrètes positives et isolées qui y sont formulées, l’on n’y trouve qu’une combinaison d’idéologies et de bricolages visant à réduire la charge de l’État au détriment des familles en difficulté et des femmes en situation de détresse.
Par l’importance de son objet et l’étendue des mesures envisagées, un tel projet de loi réclame un véritable débat public. Or ce débat public, rendu malaisé par l’absence de transparence de ce texte indécryptable par la population, n’existe pas. Il vous appartient de le créer.
Nous vous proposons par conséquent une critique d’ensemble de ce projet de loi, au cours de laquelle nous nous attacherons à mettre en lumière les prémisses idéologiques mixtes – modernes et postmodernes – qui président à la conception de la loi-cadre Égalité hommes-femmes ; nous aborderons les problèmes, concrets et réels, identifiés par les pouvoirs publics, auxquels ce texte répond fort mal, malgré quelques mesures dignes d’intérêt, mais peu signifiantes ; nous montrerons enfin comment il manifeste la politique et l’idéologie du gouvernement actuel, et l’indigence d’un mode de gouvernement de premier secrétaire du Parti socialiste.
L’exposé se fera en quatre temps : nous rappellerons dans une première partie la nature et les enjeux de cette loi-cadre, et en étudierons plus précisément l’objet et les sous-entendus; nous soulignerons ensuite les mesures intéressantes qui y figurent, avant d’en signaler les lacunes et de dénoncer pour finir les dispositions les plus graves et contraires au bien social qu’il propose.
Présentation de la loi-cadre et de son objet
On peut s’étonner de la quasi-absence de débat qui entoure ce texte, alors qu’il s’agit d’un projet de loi-cadre, soit une sorte de fourre-tout législatif appelé à modifier des dispositions dans toutes les directions, et dans tous les codes juridiques. Ce type de loi demande une lecture particulièrement attentive, comme nous allons le montrer.
Qu’est-ce qu’une loi-cadre ?
Une loi-cadre est une loi qui définit une orientation politique, laissant au pouvoir règlementaire l’application des dispositions. Il s’agit ici d’un projet de loi-cadre : un projet de loi émane du gouvernement, par opposition à la proposition de loi émanant des députés. Un projet de loi-cadre est donc un projet émanant de l’exécutif, destiné à octroyer un pouvoir à l’exécutif, validé par un pouvoir législatif de même couleur que l’exécutif.
Voilà qui remet en cause la séparation des pouvoirs inspirée de Montesquieu, proclamée dans notre Constitution comme étant la condition sine qua non de l’État de droit constitutionnel : la séparation institutionnelle existe, mais dans les faits les contre-pouvoirs à l’exécutif ont disparu. Cette situation, récente, est due à la mise en place du quinquennat ; aucune réforme constitutionnelle n’a remédié à cette anomalie. Cela aboutit à une forme de despotisme de l’exécutif qui signe la fin de l’État de droit.
Ce projet de loi est d’une importance particulière parce que son objet concerne la société entière : il entraînera des modifications dans le Code civil, le Code de la santé publique, le Code des étrangers, le Code pénal, la législation de la Sécurité sociale et des collectivités territoriales – tout cela à l’initiative du Ministère des droits des femmes.
Le projet de loi-cadre « Égalité Hommes-Femmes » et son objet
Ce projet a pour objet « l’égalité dans toutes les dimensions professionnelles, une lutte contre la précarité spécifique aux femmes, une lutte contre les violences faites aux femmes et une parité dans les postes à responsabilité [sociale] (…).»
L’Égalité et les femmes
L’application du principe juridique d’Égalité au cas des femmes a connu une évolution très nette dans l’histoire du droit français.
La première vague d’application du principe d’égalité a consisté à mettre en œuvre le principe brut, ce qui a entraîné la suppression de droits protecteurs envers les femmes : à titre d’exemple, l’arrêt de la Cour de justice européenne dit Greismar de 2001, a nettement joué en leur défaveur quant à la politique fiscale, qui leur était auparavant favorable ; la loi a également abrogé les facilités d’accès aux postes de la fonction publique pour les mères de famille. Exemplaire de cette première vague d’application brute du principe d’Égalité, la décision Quotas par sexe, adoptée par le Conseil constitutionnel le 18 novembre 1982, concluait à la non-conformité à la Constitution de la politique paritaire actuellement pratiquée.
Un revirement a ensuite eu lieu, dont l’instrument fut la distinction nouvelle opérée entre égalité de fait et égalité devant la loi : il s’agissait désormais de marcher vers l’égalité de fait, en utilisant au besoin des discriminations dites « positives ». Ce qui correspond à un glissement vers l’État-Providence.
Le projet de loi de Najat Vallaud-Belkacem marque une troisième étape, nouvelle version de l’égalité, inconnue jusqu’alors : l’égalité dite « intégrée », qui combine l’égalité devant la loi (la fin) et l’égalité de fait (les moyens), l’idéologie permettant seule de trancher et de donner la primauté à l’une ou à l’autre. Dans ce projet crypto-totalitaire, le principe d’égalité devient ainsi le masque d’une idéologie qui pourra s’appliquer dans la coercition et le mensonge, grâce à la confusion principes-moyens-fins.
C’est ainsi que la contradiction entre égalité de droit et égalité de fait est supposée résolue dans l’« égalité intégrée » de Madame Vallaud-Belkacem.
Rappel sur la notion juridique d’Égalité
La notion juridique d’Egalité, particularisme français par excellence, trouve son fondement dans l’article 6 de la Déclaration des Droits de l’Homme et du Citoyen : « la loi […] doit être la même pour tous, soit qu’elle protège, soit qu’elle punisse. Tous les citoyens étant égaux à ses yeux sont également admissibles à toutes dignités, places et emplois publics, selon leur capacité, et sans autre distinction que celle de leur vertus et de leurs talents.» La décision du 9 mai 1991, Statut de la Corse, ajoute « que le peuple français [est] composé de tous les citoyens français sans distinction d’origine, de race, de sexe ou de religion. » Nous avons donc là un principe complet.
Une limite et une exception s’y ajoutent : depuis une décision du 9 avril 1996, le Conseil constitutionnel juge que « le principe d’égalité ne s’oppose ni à ce que le législateur règle de façon différente des situations objectivement différentes, ni à ce qu’il déroge à l’égalité pour des raisons d’intérêt général, pourvu que, dans l’un et l’autre cas, la différence de traitement qui en résulte soit en rapport direct avec l’objet de la loi qui l’établit. » La limite énoncée ne doit pas contrevenir au principe énoncé dans la loi, et n’a vocation qu’à le compléter : elle permet de faire l’objet d’un traitement différent, si et seulement si l’on se trouve dans une situation objectivement différente. On ne peut conclure à une « situation objectivement différente » sur la base d’une distinction de race, de sexe ou d’opinion. Mais les règles énoncées dans le principe de la loi et sa limite peuvent faire l’objet d’une exception, lorsque l’ « intérêt général » le réclame – exception qui prend valeur de règle. Ce qui, dans la pratique, signifie que la discrimination entre un national et un étranger, ou la différence de traitement entre personnes de sexe masculin ou féminin, est légalement possible en vertu de l’intérêt général.
Le texte énonçant le principe d’Egalité devant la loi, sa limite et son exception, autorise donc des discriminations légales, via la notion d’intérêt général.
Des dispositions de lois très attendues que nous saluons
Cette première partie est indifférente à l’idéologie qui sous-tend le projet de loi étudié – nous nous intéressons uniquement aux mesures concrètes et positives qui y figurent. Elles sont intéressantes parce que protectrices, et reconnaissent l’existence de spécificités féminines sans tomber dans l’écueil de la « discrimination positive ». Elles favorisent les femmes sans jouer au détriment des hommes.
Cette loi propose dans son titre II, portant sur la précarité des femmes, la possibilité d’un autre système de paiement pour les assistantes maternelles, permettant aux familles de ne pas attendre les impôts avant de bénéficier de l’abattement : « Afin d’aider les familles modestes à recourir à l’offre d’accueil par les assistants maternels, le versement en tiers payant, directement à l’assistant maternel agréé, du complément de libre choix du mode de garde normalement versé au parent employeur est expérimenté. »
La loi crée une autorisation d’absence pour permettre aux conjoints de se rendre aux rendez-vous médicaux concernant la grossesse : « Le conjoint salarié de la femme enceinte ou la personne salariée liée à elle par un pacte civil de solidarité ou vivant maritalement avec elle bénéficie également d’une autorisation d’absence pour se rendre à trois de ces examens médicaux obligatoires au maximum. »
Elle met en place une protection de la femme enceinte dans le cadre des professions libérales : « La collaboratrice libérale en état de grossesse médicalement constaté a le droit de suspendre sa collaboration pendant au moins seize semaines à l’occasion de l’accouchement. À compter de la déclaration de grossesse et jusqu’à l’expiration d’un délai de huit semaines à l’issue de la période de suspension du contrat, le contrat de collaboration libérale ne peut être rompu unilatéralement, sauf en cas de manquement grave aux règles déontologiques ou propres à l’exercice professionnel de l’intéressée, non lié à l’état de grossesse. » « Le collaborateur libéral a le droit de suspendre sa collaboration pendant onze jours consécutifs suivant la naissance de l’enfant, durée portée à dix-huit jours consécutifs en cas de naissances multiples. À compter de l’annonce par le collaborateur libéral de son intention de suspendre son contrat de collaboration après la naissance de l’enfant et jusqu’à l’expiration d’un délai de huit semaines à l’issue de la période de suspension du contrat, le contrat de collaboration libérale ne peut être rompu unilatéralement, sauf en cas de manquement grave aux règles déontologiques ou propres à l’exercice professionnel de l’intéressé, non lié à la paternité.»
La loi prend en compte les différences de sexe dans l’évaluation des risques professionnels. Le projet de loi-cadre modifie ainsi l’article L. 4 121-3 du code du travail : « Cette évaluation des risques tient compte de l’impact différencié de l’exposition au risque en fonction du sexe. »
La procédure pour les victimes de violence est également modifiée : actuellement une « médiation » est obligatoire en cas de plainte pour violences conjugales, soit une entrevue entre les deux conjoints en conflit, en présence d’une tierce personne – en pratique, il s’agit davantage d’une confrontation que d’une médiation. Avec cette loi, la séance de médiation n’aura lieu que si la victime le demande.
Un article prévoit que le personnel judicaire et policier reçoive une formation concernant les violences faites aux femmes. Il est temps que cesse le mauvais accueil réservé aux femmes victimes de viol dans certains services.
Nous approuvons également la tentative d’accélération des procédures, ainsi que le renforcement du système préventif, pour les victimes de violence.
Nous saluons enfin, et en particulier, la disposition suivante visant à encadrer strictement les concours de « Mini Miss »– en nous interrogeant toutefois sur la raison pour laquelle cette disposition, qui augmente les possibilités de contrôle de l’État, figure sous le titre concernant l’autorité parentale : « Toute personne qui organise un concours d’enfants de moins de seize ans fondé sur l’apparence doit obtenir l’autorisation préalable du représentant de l’État dans le département. Seuls les concours dont les modalités d’organisation assurent la protection de l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant et de sa dignité peuvent être autorisés.»
Des attentes laissées en suspens, des titres vides
Dans une loi dont l’emballage semble aussi prometteur, nous constatons avec consternation que certains titres sont pratiquement vides… Et que le traitement de nombreux problèmes reste très décevant.
Le Titre III bis, « Dispositions visant à préserver l’autorité partagée et à privilégier la résidence alternée pour l’enfant» est… entièrement vide. Le titre était pourtant prometteur : à l’heure où le divorce concerne un couple sur cinq, reconsidérer la question de l’autorité partagée semble répondre à une demande sociale très saine, voire à une véritable urgence. Mais ce titre reste vide. N’y figure que la disposition concernant le contrôle strict par l’État des concours de beauté pour les enfants de moins de 16 ans. L’autorité partagée aujourd’hui, c’est donc l’autorité du père, de la mère et de l’État. Voilà qui rend perplexe.
Les questions de justice salariale sont traitées par la création de nouveaux conseils et commissions – nouveau camouflage bureaucratique. Le phénomène, lourdement réel et concret, des inégalités salariales, n’est pas un problème exclusivement féminin – voire féministe : c’est le fonctionnement économique global de la France qui est en jeu. Il est faux de penser que ces inégalités salariales trouvent leur explication sociale dans une misogynie organisée par le « Patriarcat ». Elles sont le fruit d’une réalité : la vie d’une femme en entreprise est souvent conditionnée et limitée par ses congés maternité, avec pour conséquence la tentation pour les entreprises d’éponger le préjudice des grossesses en limitant ou n’augmentant pas le salaire des femmes.Lors de la négociation de salaire, l’entreprise négociera en réalité le temps d’absence de la salariée en congé et ses impacts sur l’entreprise. Lors du départ en congé maternité d’une salariée, l’entreprise continue de payer l’URSSAF, et la salariée absente est toujours comptée au nombre des salariés de l’entreprise, ce qui peut poser de réels problèmes de seuil pour la société. En outre, les difficultés et la précarité de l’embauche sur ce poste vacant – pour une durée qui peut aller jusqu’à 5 ans en cas de congés à répétition – sont un poids réel pour l’employeur. Aucune solution véritable – donc globale – n’est envisagée à l’heure actuelle.« A situation égale, traitement égal » – or une femme n’est pas dans la même « situation » qu’un homme. La négociation des salaires prend en compte les inégalités réelles de situation avec beaucoup moins de scrupules que la loi, qui ignore les réalités temporelles de la vie d’une femme. Or la maternité ne doit pas être vécue comme un handicap dont le poids serait supporté uniquement par les femmes. Des solutions financières concrètes sont à envisager afin de permettre aux entreprises d’employer des femmes en âge d’enfanter, sans que les employeurs ne subissent un préjudice en cas de congé maternité.
La question des violences faites aux femmes est symptomatique d’un système judicaire qui va mal. Peut-être serait-il temps prendre le problème à bras le corps et de ne pas laisser madame Taubira défaire d’un côté ce que madame Vallaud-Belkacem prétend faire de l’autre. Si les femmes sont les premières victimes de violences, elles sont loin d’être les seules – une réforme pénitentiaire et judiciaire est impérative.
Des dispositions idéologiques et liberticides
Si nous saluons certaines des prises de positions gouvernementales, sous réserve de leur application, il n’en va pas de même du reste des dispositions – en particulier de celles mentionnées ci-dessous. Deux dimensions sont à considérer : d’une part, le caractère très idéologique, voire mensonger, de ces dispositions et, d’autre part, leur impact économique réel – elles aboutissent souvent à réduire les charges de l’État au détriment des familles les plus modestes, sans que la situation des femmes ne soit jamais prise en compte.
Réforme du congé parental
La réforme du congé parental, telle que ce projet de loi la prévoit, a des objectifs très clairs – « remettre mesdames au travail »– qui, sous couvert d’égalité, représentent pour les intéressées une évidente perte de droits.
Dans un couple dont la situation financière est modeste, le second conjoint ne peut pas se permettre de prendre six mois de congé parental : dans la plupart des cas, la mère reprendra plus vite le travail, l’enfant ira à la crèche, et l’État économisera ces six mois de congé parental sur le dos des familles – la réforme aurait-elle pour seul objectif de réduire la dette de l’État ?
Le projet de loi souligne, par ailleurs, une réalité à laquelle il ne remédie guère : les congés maternité à répétition posent un véritable problème aux petites et moyennes entreprises, raison principale de la discrimination à l’embauche des femmes en âge d’être mères. Plutôt que de chercher une véritable solution économique permettant de faciliter leur recrutement, madame Vallaud-Belkacem supprime six mois de congé parental, ce qui frappera les familles en précarité, et jusqu’aux classes moyennes. S’agit-il d’une mesure favorisant l’égalité, ou d’une façon détournée de faire des économies ?
Par ailleurs, si les pères de familles prennent à l’avenir de façon systématique les six mois de congé auxquels la loi leur donnerait droit, ce sont tous les jeunes couples de la tranche d’âge 25 -30 ans qui se trouveront discriminés à l’embauche, et non plus seulement les femmes. Faire en sorte qu’un problème devienne général et non plus spécifique, ce n’est pas résoudre ce problème…
Suppression de la notion de détresse dans la règlementation de l’IVG
Supprimer la notion de détresse de la législation sur l’IVG revient à nier la souffrance de la femme qui avorte. Les promoteurs de cette disposition invoquent le nombre limité des avortements qui remplissent effectivement cette condition de « situation de détresse ».
Mais l’abolir revient à accréditer dans les esprits l’idée qu’il existerait des « avortements de confort » anodins et indolores, et à faire de l’avortement l’équivalent d’une « séance de rattrapage » contraceptive. Ce faisant, l’État se dédouane de ses responsabilités : si l’avortement est un « droit » positif dont l’exercice n’évoque plus la moindre notion de souffrance, l’aide post-traumatique aux avortements que prévoyait la loi Veil devient inutile et l’on peut s’attendre à ce qu’elle soit supprimée – or il est reconnu que les femmes ayant subi un avortement ont, pour la plupart, besoin de soutien psychologique.
Par ailleurs, l’avortement étant la seule solution proposée dans chaque cas de grossesse non désirée, il est entendu que celles qui auraient besoin de structures d’accueil et de protection parce qu’elles ont décidé de garder l’enfant, ne sont plus en mesure de demander légitimement aucune aide.
Les dispositions du gouvernement secondent la tyrannie technique, et l’État se démet à nouveau de ses responsabilités sociales, puisque l’avortement est promu comme réponse unique à la question des grossesses non désirées. Pour ne pas avoir à régler un problème de société, il semble plus simple d’en nier l’existence – la suprême habileté consistant à le transformer, ainsi que la souffrance qui l’accompagne, en droit positif et libérateur.
Punition pénale pour les sites concurrents à l’IVG
Informer sur les risques liés à l’avortement et les solutions alternatives devient aujourd’hui un délit d’entrave. L’article L. 2223 -2 du code de la santé publique est en effet ainsi modifié :
« 1° Au premier alinéa, après la seconde occurrence du mot : « empêcher », sont insérés les mots : « de pratiquer ou de s’informer sur » ;
2° Au dernier alinéa, après les mots : « y subir », sont insérés les mots : « ou s’informer sur ». Remise en situation, cette disposition prévoit donc que soit « puni de deux ans d’emprisonnement et de 30 000 € d’amende le fait d’empêcher ou de tenter d’empêcher de pratiquer ou de s’informer sur une interruption de grossesse ou les actes préalables prévus par les articles L.2212-3 à L.2212-8 : – soit en perturbant de quelque manière que ce soit l’accès aux établissements mentionnés à l’article L. 2212-2, la libre circulation des personnes à l’intérieur de ces établissements ou les conditions de travail des personnels médicaux et non médicaux ; – soit en exerçant des pressions morales et psychologiques, des menaces ou tout acte d’intimidation à l’encontre des personnels médicaux et non médicaux travaillant dans ces établissements, des femmes venues y subir ou s’informer sur une interruption volontaire de grossesse ou de l’entourage de ces dernières».
Ces modifications visent à condamner les sites dits « pro-life » en les accusant de faire obstacle à l’information. Il s’agit d’une atteinte sans pareille à la liberté d’expression, qui contrevient à une liberté de choix effective. Pour qu’un choix soit éclairé, il ne suffit pas d’avoir accès aux renseignements techniques de l’un des termes de l’alternative, il faut encore pouvoir confronter le pour et le contre. Donner pour seule « information » à la femme confrontée à une grossesse non délibérée un manuel technique de l’avortement, comme celui que propose www.ivg.gouv.fr, ce n’est pas éclairer le choix, mais supprimer l’alternative.
Lutte contre les stérotypes dans les émissions de radio et les télécommunications audio-visuelles.
L’article 16 « assure le respect des droits des femmes dans le domaine de la communication audiovisuelle. À cette fin, il veille, d’une part, à une juste représentation des femmes et des hommes dans les programmes des services de communication audiovisuelle et, d’autre part, à l’image des femmes qui apparaît dans ces programmes, notamment en luttant contre les stéréotypes, les préjugés sexistes, les images dégradantes, les violences faites aux femmes et les violences commises au sein des couples. Dans ce but, il porte une attention particulière aux programmes des services de communication audiovisuelle destinés à l’enfance et à la jeunesse. »
Cette mesure omet de préciser qui s’arrogera le droit de censurer les « stéréotypes », et comment cette autorité déterminera si un « stéréotype » est bon ou mauvais. Tout « stéréotype » est-il mauvais en soi ? Ou bien doit-on considérer comme mauvais tout ce qui est inégal ? Mais qu’est-ce qui est inégal ? Les questions sans réponses auxquelles aboutit cette disposition en manifestent l’absurdité – une loi provoquant un tel enchevêtrement de questions, sur la base d’une vulgarisation idéologique et politique des gender studies universitaires, n’a pas lieu d’être. Cette disposition est manifestement contraire à la nature et à la finalité de la loi, qui doit donner un cadre clair à la vie publique.
Exit « bonus paterfamilias »
L’expression « en bon père de famille» disparaît de la jurisprudence, remplacée par « raisonnablement».« À l’article 601, au 1° de l’article 1728, à l’article 1729 et au premier alinéa de l’article 1766, les mots : « en bon père de famille » sont remplacés par le mot : “raisonnablement”».
Évidemment, les deux termes n’étant pas synonymes, et une métaphore étant remplacée par une platitude, il s’agit d’une perte de richesse sémantique pour la jurisprudence. Cette modification est complètement inutile, concernant une notion juridique dont la valeur dépasse la question des représentations sexuées.
La notion de « bon père de famille» provient directement de l’expression bonus pater familias. Il désigne l’attitude d’un individu normalement prudent et diligent, attentif, soucieux des biens et/ou des intérêts qui lui sont confiés comme s’il s’agissait des siens propres.
Ce changement sémantique superflu montre que le gouvernement veut couper notre droit de son histoire pour satisfaire quelques susceptibilités féministes.
Le nom d’épouse disparaît : étape vers la disparition du foyer fiscal
Il convient, avant d’évoquer cette disposition, de rappeler que la femme en France n’a jamais juridiquement changé de nom pour prendre celui de son époux ; le nom de l’époux est seulement un nom d’usage toléré et valable dans les documents administratifs. Ce nom d’usage rattachait en principe la femme et les enfants (dont la filiation est certaine) au père, instaurant une primauté de la filiation juridique sur la filiation biologique.
Avec la nouvelle loi, l’usage du nom de l’époux disparaît totalement des pratiques administratives. Cette perte peut sembler aussi anodine que la disparition du terme « Mademoiselle » dans la législation et l’administration. Or, qu’il s’agisse de la civilité « Mademoiselle » ou du nom d’épouse, l’objectif poursuivi est de supprimer dans la pratique administrative la différence entre une mère de famille mariée et une femme célibataire. Le rattachement au père est estimé inutile à la construction de la cellule familiale, comme l’est celui de Madame à Monsieur. Les retombées d’ordre symbolique de cette disposition sont considérables.
Ces changements par petites touches signent dans le droit et dans sa traduction administrative la disparition de la famille. Si celle-ci n’a plus de réalité juridique, elle perdra sa réalité sociale. Cela n’a rien d’une spéculation, puisque les réformes fiscales prévoient la disparition du « foyer fiscal », qui permet notamment des abattements d’impôt pour les familles et fait exister la cellule familiale dans l’univers fiscal.
La raison sous-jacente de cette disposition hypocrite, à dimension symbolique et idéologique très forte, doit-elle être cherchée dans la volonté de préparer les futures économies que permettra la dissolution administrative de la cellule familiale ?
Parité à outrance
L’article 18 bis de la loi prévoit : « 1° À la seconde phrase du premier alinéa de l’article L. 2122-7-2, après le mot : “listes,”, sont insérés les mots : “le premier candidat est de sexe différent de celui du maire”. » Par ailleurs, « Le titre IV (articles 18 à 23) a pour objet la mise en œuvre de l’objectif constitutionnel de parité. Les mesures proposées ont notamment pour objet :
de renforcer la réduction du montant (première fraction) attribué aux partis politiques ne respectant pas les objectifs de parité dès la prochaine législature, soit en 2017 (article 18) ;
de modifier le code du sport pour introduire « une évolution vers la parité dans les modalités de désignation des représentants pour les instances de gouvernance des fédérations sportives agréées » (article 19) ;
de permettre une représentation équilibrée dans les chambres de commerce et d’industrie (article 21) ;
ou de mettre en place des listes paritaires pour les élections aux chambres d’agriculture (article 22). »
Le dernier chapitre de cette loi concerne la parité homme-femme. Dans l’esprit de madame Vallaud-Belkacem, la parité désigne la représentation égalitaire des hommes et femmes dans l’ensemble de la société, par l’imposition de quotas.
Soucieuses de la complémentarité hommes-femmes et de la véritable prise en compte des compétences féminines, nous nous inquiétons de telles dispositions. La parité à grands renforts de quotas et d’obligations recrée une misogyne ordinaire : elle renforce le présupposé selon lequel une femme n’occupe pas sa position sociale parce qu’elle est compétente, mais parce qu’elle contribue à remplir un quota légal. Ce type de dispositions paritaires propulse à tous les échelons de la société des prête-noms qui véhiculent, malgré elles, une image d’incapacité, puisqu’elles ne souhaitent pas réaliser pleinement la mission qui leur est confiée – le fait est particulièrement évident dans le domaine politique, où le fait de préférer telle ou telle personne en fonction de son sexe plutôt que de ses compétences réelles est inquiétant pour le bon fonctionnement de la société.
Nous préférons réaffirmer la compétence réelle des femmes à exercer des postes clés, privilégiant la qualité à la quantité. Nous demandons le respect des compétences féminines, et la suppression des dispositions légales favorisant la misogynie ordinaire.
Afin de favoriser l’égal accès des femmes aux postes clés, pourquoi ne pas préférer de véritables changements concrets, permettant aux femmes qui le souhaitent de s’engager – comme, tout simplement, l’aménagement des horaires de réunions, la mise en place de crèches d’entreprise, ou encore l’accès aux formations de cadre pour les mères de famille ?
Conclusion
Malgré les quelques mesures concrètes positives soulignées au début de cette étude, l’ampleur des aberrations dénoncées nous conduit à rejeter sans appel l’ensemble de ce pack législatif. Symptomatique de notre temps, cette loi touche aux conséquences et non aux causes, oscille entre le concret et l’idéologie.
La tentative de synthèse entre égalitarisme moderne et différencialisme postmoderne semble vouée à l’échec– c’est l’alliance de la carpe et du lapin, ou l’art de tenir ensemble des contradictions dans une même proposition sans apporter la moindre solution réaliste aux problèmes de société.
Epilogue
Cette analyse de la loi dite de l’égalité homme-femme, et de l’ « égalité intégrée » qu’elle propose, montre les impasses et l’hypocrisie des dispositions idéologiques/ économiques que le gouvernement s’apprête à prendre, en l’absence d’un débat public véritablement transparent et constructif. Le principe d’Égalité demande à être fondé sur un principe de Justice, en vue du bien social. A l’hypocrisie et aux contradictions des politiques égalitaires, nous préférons la notion réaliste et concrète d’inégalités protectrices.
Mettre en place une politique sociale d’inégalités protectrices, c’est employer une méthode réaliste et concrète permettant d’appliquer à des situations différentes des traitements différents. Cette notion doit être formulée non plus comme une limite, mais comme une exception – c’est à dire une règle de même valeur que celle qu’énonce le principe. En effet, ces inégalités protectrices doivent trouver leur limite dans l’objectivité des différences de situation, et n’être qu’une exception à l’égalité devant la loi, exception exclusivement motivée par l’intérêt général. La différence sexuelle peut, dans des situations concrètes et objectives, comme la maternité, ou encore devant le constat réaliste de la fragilité physique de la femme en cas de violences, fonder des mesures protectrices inégalitaires. L’égalité devant la loi est inefficiente et vaine lorsqu’il s’agit de protéger les femmes des violences dont elles sont l’objet, ou encore de proposer des solutions concrètes aux femmes que leur condition sexuée place en situation précaire – en raison notamment de la maternité.
Traiter de la question féminine ne revient pas à se préoccuper du cas d’une minorité particulière qui bénéficierait de privilèges de groupe. Les mesures qui concernent les femmes intéressent l’ensemble de la société. La question féminine ne doit pas être l’apanage d’un ministère prétendant représenter les femmes comme un groupe à part, et dont les compétences se superposent à celle des autres organes gouvernementaux – elle doit être envisagée dans chaque ministère, chaque fois que la matière traitée le réclame, afin d’intégrer la politique concernant les femmes dans une vision d’ensemble cohérente et efficace. Émanant d’un ministère des Droits des femmes aux compétences floues et non spécialisées (puisque ce sujet concerne toute la société), les dispositions de cette loi traitent les questions réelles de façon partielle, fragmentaire, idéologique. Ce constat d’incompétence est particulièrement flagrant lorsqu’il s’agit de traiter la situation économique des femmes en âge d’enfanter ; il est le symptôme d’un gouvernement qui ignore les véritables problèmes de la société française.
The civilised RACIST, FASCIST, Israeli Judeo-Christian West captured a 9 year-old Muslim savage in Sweden! They were ferocious and one of them knocked the head of the child on the ground many times! HIS CRIME: He had apparently travelled without a train ticket???
However, I do not blame the European savages, but, only the 'human' cowards (mind controlled ZOMBIES) that stood by and did not come to the help of the 9 year-old defenceless boy!I wished Dr Tariq Ramadan was present on the scene to see what he would have done!Had I been present, I would have pounced on that wild animal who was attacking (not arresting) and do whatever my 69 year-old carcass could do, but I would not have stood by NOT DEFENDING THAT 9 YEAR OLD BOY, Black or white, Muslim or not!It was an excellent opportunity for me at long last to GIVE MY LIFE FOR A LIFE! (And I am not angry, not at all!)
But,, why should the civilised West care about kids when their armies, Police, media, politicians, religious leaders, military, terrorists and hired assassins, are murdering and condoning the murder of millions of kids around the Muslim and non Muslim world alike, including their own babies through legal BABY MURDER they call ABORTION?They even practice human sacrifice on their own young boys and girls, including rape and sex slavery!
"Third World" Muslims are shit and terrorists and do not deserve to live, so why not kill them all as well inside the boundaries of the West like the Judaics are doing in the terrorist and ethnic cleaning entity known as Israel!The West and Communists have already butchered some 150 million Muslims worldwide under a variety of pretexts, ideologies, including, "democracy", "Human Rights" and "Western civilisation"!
But, most western educated Muslims are indeed shit as they never learn, and they practice a false religion they call Islam and a false God they call Allah while in real fact they practice the Way of Satan (Diin as Shaytaan).They see the forces of Satan murdering their people en masse, and they do practically nothing to stop it!
BUT, WOULD THOSE RACIST SAVAGES HAVE TREATED A 9 YEAR OLD WHITE OR JEWISH BOY IN THE SAME MANNER?
LONG LIVE TOTALITARIAN, ANTICHRIST, FASCIST, RACIST, IMPERIUALIST AND DECADENT EUROPE AND LONG LIVE US-ISRAEL!
L'arrestation brutale d'un petit marocain de 9 ans suscite une vive émotion en Suède. Deux gardes de sécurité d'une société privée ont interpellé brutalement le petit garçon à sa descente à la gare de Malmö car il voyageait sans billet. La société de sécurité qui emploie les deux agents déplore l'incident alors qu'une enquête contre les deux agents a été ouverte.
L’arrestation brutale en Suède d’un enfant de 9 ans originaire du Maroc a suscité une vive émotion dans le pays. Ce petit garçon a été arrêté à sa descente à la gare de Malmö. Son tort: avoir voyagé en train sans titre de transport. Il a été brutalement maîtrisé au sol par un des agents.
Plaqué au sol comme un grand malfaiteur, le garçon a vu l’agent tenter de lui fermer sauvagement la bouche. Malgré les cris du petit, qui ne parlait pas suédois, il a continué à le brutaliser. L'enfant sans défense a alors prononcé la Chahada: « j'atteste qu'il n'y a de Dieu en dehors d'Allah et Mohammed est son messager », pensant sans doute vivre ses dernières secondes.
La vidéo, postée le 9 février sur Youtube, a en tout cas suscité beaucoup d'indignation chez les internautes. « Le garçon ne semblait pas faire quelque chose de répréhensible, mais l'agent de sécurité l'a traité comme s'il s'agissait d'un homme de 90 kgs: il s'est assis sur lui, a frappé sa tête contre le sol », raconte un témoin de la scène au journal suédois Sydsvenskan.
Enquête ouverte contre les deux agents
Mais l'affaire est loin d'être finie. Une enquête a été lancée après la mise en ligne de la vidéo sur internet. Les deux agents soupçonnés d'agression seront interrogés. Svensk Bevakningstjänste, la société qui emploie les deux agents, a réagi après avoir visionné les terribles images de l'arrestation du garçon. « C'est vrai que les images ne sont pas belles à voir, a expliqué le PDG de la société, Anders Lönnebo, qui précise que les agents avaient été contactés pour interpeller le Marocain à sa sortie du train, ce qu'ils ont fait ».
Dans la vidéo, seuls les deux agents de la société privés sont identifiables, mais Lönnebo explique que la police apparait également dans d'autres images. Des rapports ont été déposés à la police et au niveau de la société privée. Cette dernière est sous contrat avec l’entreprise gestionnaire de la gare, Jernhusen.
Le porte-parole de Jernhusen, Cecilia Granath, a déclaré que son entreprise avait été en contact avec la société de sécurité après l'incident. « Nous avons une politique de tolérance zéro envers la violence excessive », a-t-elle fait savoir à Thelocal.se. « Il est clair que cela est très grave sur la vidéo, mais en ce moment nous avons trop peu d'informations pour tirer une conclusion ». Granath a ajouté que la société de sécurité mène son « enquête interne et nous attendrons ses conclusions ».
The biggest story of our generation is unfolding in the UK to near complete silence in the international corporate media. The UK media that cover it at all depict it as a ‘sex scandal’ committed by ‘child lovers’. What the UK media depicts as “child sex” has left children missing the lower half of their bodies. These so-called ‘sex scandals’ involve children provided for torture as bait to blackmail political opponents in Northern Ireland. The UK has open files on 200 missing boys from 1977 and 1983. The investigation has so far involved a huge circle of UK establishment from media, politicians, police and intelligence, known to police as The Untouchables. There are international ties being ignored. To the people of the UK, your ruling classes are preying on you. Not just in the ways you always knew they were. Our friends in the UK, just like our friends in Gabon, have a political class that is torturing and murdering their children and mutilating their bodies. Unlike in Gabon, the UK media is following the direction of the Paedophile Information Exchange and telling you these people are child lovers who need understanding and tolerance. They are telling you this is sex. Who controls the words controls your thoughts. This is not sex. These people feed off the agony of others. They cause wars and destruction during their working hours and they torture and murder children as recreation. These are not child lovers.These are death eaters. To the people of the world, this story is not limited to the UK. Unlike us, death eaters have no borders. Human trafficking is the biggest criminal industry in the world. Death eaters have global networks. Resistance is existence. We are Anonymous. We are everywhere. We are legion. We are those you have left without a home. We are those you have murdered. We are voiceless no more. The world will change. We’ll change it. Tyrants of the World, Expect Us!
Video Evidence: http://youtu.be/LtncDnCRPYo & http://youtu.be/UzueXF25KI8
Full Video Archive & Testimonials: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Byzy22cCtwpdOEM2bG00eXE2eTg&usp=sharing
LE FAUX MUSULMAN, LE FRANC-MAÇON SIONISTE DALIL BOUBAKEUR!
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Par Salomé Legrand et benjamin Bonneau
2313
258
43
INFO E1 - Le Conseil Français du Culte Musulman estime que les propos tenus par le président du Conseil représentatif des institutions juives de France sont "irresponsables et inadmissibles".
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
L'INFO."Il faut dire les choses : toutes les violences aujourd'hui sont commises par des jeunes musulmans. Bien sûr, c'est une toute petite minorité de la communauté musulmane et les musulmans en sont les premières victimes". Les propos de Roger Cukierman, président du Conseil représentatif des institutions juives de France (Crif), lundi matin sur Europe 1, ont créé la polémique. Pour lui, le terme d'"islamo-fascisme", repris la semaine dernière par Manuel Valls, "correspond assez bien à la réalité". Des propos qui ont poussé le Conseil Français du Culte Musulman (CFCM) a décidé de boycotter le traditionnel repas du Crif, lundi soir, selon les informations d'Europe 1.
"Des déclarations irresponsables et inadmissibles". "Le Bureau Exécutif du Conseil Français du Culte Musulman (CFCM) réuni ce jour à la Mosquée de Paris, a pris connaissance avec consternation des propos tenus ce matin même par le Président du CRIF, Roger Cukierman, sur les ondes d'Europe 1. Considérer que "toutes les violences aujourd'hui sont commises par des jeunes musulmans" et que son approbation de l'expression "islamo-fascisme" sont des déclarations irresponsables et inadmissibles qui contreviennent au principe même du vivre-ensemble", peut-on lire dans un communiqué dont Europe 1 a pris connaissance avant sa publication. Et le CFCM de conclure qu'il "ne peut accepter que la composante musulmane de France soit aujourd'hui l'objet d'attaques aussi graves qu'infondées. Compte tenu des déclarations du président du CRIF, le CFCM juge inopportun de participer au dîner du CRIF de ce soir".*
Homeland Security was set up by Israeli-American "Israeli-first" Dual Citizens as an Israeli police State occupation army inside America and it's time to completely de-fund it and destroy it forever.
So far legislation to re-fund it has been blocked by Republicans over their unwillingness to approve portions of the bill which will supports President Obama’s Executive Actions supporting amnesty and a path to citizenship for many illegal immigrants. Homeland Security (DHS) is a criminal organization with no official mandate. It is unconstitutional and even worse it is an private foreign based occupation army inside America deployed to surveil, harass, abuse, tyrannize, disarm and eventually to intern and then progressively mass-murder all Americans.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was set up by the Khazarian Mafia using Israeli-American “Israeli-first” Dual and Triple Citizen Traitors. Now is the time to face this horrible reality that our American Congress was essentially bought by the various Israeli espionage fronts like AIPAC and the like, who basically bribed them to pass the bill authorizing this criminal, Unconstitutional organization DHS in the first place. The Samson Option was used by Khazarian Mafia Kingpins to Blackmail the Bush2 Administration into pushing this illegal, Unconstitutional, unmandated legislation conceived in hell and delivered in hate. It was noted investigative Journalist Seymour Hersch that disclosed the Khazarian Mafia’s use of nuclear Blackmail on the US Administrations as well as other nations of the World to get the kind of new laws they wanted in order to complete their infiltration and hijacking of numerous governments. The Bush2 Administration was informed long in advance of the 9-11-01 nuclear attack on America by Cheney who was in on the plot and communicated the cover story that the Administration had to go along with this and capitalize on the terror aspects to gain more power, or otherwise there would be more Cities nuked. The cover story (Big Government Lie and False-narrative) used to push Members of Congress was that various American Intel knew of the plot basics ahead of time but did not coordinate Intel enough to figure it out enough to stop it. Some members of the House and Senate Intel Committees knew the full story and actually were a part of it. These members of these key Congressional Intel Committees as well as some others key members of Congress have been alleged to have been paid 20 million USD payments as “set-aside allocations” in regular installments by the Khazarian Mafia to assist with the massive coverup about the nuclear attack on America on 9-11-01 by the Khazarian Mafia aka the Rothschild World Zionists and their Babylonian Talmudic Judaic Likudists and NeoCon Cutouts, quite a number of which were stateside and are Israeli-American “Israeli-first” Dual Citizen Traitors. This of course is Treason, Sedition, RICO and a plethora of serious and capital Federal and State crimes including espionage by a foreign power against the United States of America. If you want to see a rogue’s gallery of who are the main perps of the nuclear attack on America examine this now classic article here. And if you want more actual proof taken from a formerly Top Secret AEC investigation released in 2003 to House and Senate Intel Committee Members, see this. Or see this for a quick video summary. A recent Congressional study has shown that the DHS Fusion Centers have uncovered and prevented no incidents of terrorism inside America. All DHS has done successfully is engage in illegal spying on Americans on behalf of the Khazarian Mafia. DHS was set up by former head of the East German Stasi, Marcus Wolfe who was hired as a consultant. He died mysteriously two years afterwards (or had a fake death with a new identity like Leonard Milman the apparent current head of the Khazarian Mafia who now resides in Cuba as his base of operations). A few other supposedly deceased Khazarian Mafia Chieftain live there too about 40 miles from Havana, including one very wealthy liquor magnate who also supposedly died. Those who want to know the actual names of most of the top “Circle of Twelve that become thirteen” Khazarian Mafia Chieftains can visit VT Columnist Stew Webb’s website or view his articles on VT. As many now realize thanks to a Federal Lawsuit that was actually reported on briefly in the news but is now ignored, DHS was set up to be managed by sexually inverted females that sexually harassed top male management and moved their offices into the male lavatory. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Homeland Security has been working hard to militarize the American Police. A primary function of Homeland Security is to Militarize the American police and transform them into cloned, mind-kontrolled “agents of the state” rather than public servants there to “protect and serve.” DHS has been working very hard using ADL assets to transform the American police to view the average innocent American as an “Enemy of the State“, a potential Enemy of the State, a Domestic Terrorist or a Potential Domestic Terrorists. DHS publishes and distributes nonsense list of domestic or potential domestic terrorists to Police Departments and one of their latest ones list the first three as Catholics, Evangelical Lutherans, and Veterans. Khazarian Mafia Lieutenant and Chitown Mayer Rahm Imanuel has just been exposed for running a Black Prison Site for the Chitown Police who have been substantially militarized. DHS Terrorist watch Lists are fabricated lies designed to spook Local Police in order to justify surveillance and harassment. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.But their TSA “No-Fly” lists and their FBI “No-Work” lists are purely tyrannical and have been ruing thousands of the lives of honest upstanding American whistle-blowers who have stood up and tried to do their job as law abiding citizens. These lists are complete bunk, propaganda designed to spook the police into being afraid of everyone and for local Police Intel Units to feel justified working with DHS to spy on any dissidents or whistle-blowers who want the USG corruption cleaned up. The damage the DHS perverts, goons, liars and Khazarian mafia controlled traitors who run it are doing to America and We The People is monstrous and must be immediately stopped. We can not allow a foreign based Organized Crime Cabal Assets and Cutouts to run rampant inside America corrupting politicians and covering up the massive crimes of the Khazarian Mafia while oppressing, tyrannizing and murdering Americans. Now is the time to bust up and destroy DHS, the most criminal, perverted foreign based espionage front that ever penetrated America besides the private Illegal, Unconstitutional Federal Reserve System of Counterfeiters. The FBI is functioning as a RICO criminal organization that is un-chartered and has no right to legally exist at all. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.The FBI has no legal charter and is functioning as a RICO criminal organization which has periodically engaged in acts of terrorism inside America such as Waco, Ruby Ridge, Murrah, the first trade center Bombing. It has aided in the coverups of the JFK, MLK, RFK and many more assassinations such as Gary Cardori, Senator John Towers, Governor Carnahan and Senator Paul Wellstone. Lately its specialty is covering Khazarian Mafia crimes inside America and paying “not to worry” shakedown visits to Members of Congress to encourage them to stay within their allowed parameters and to write their own search warrants and National Security Letters in order to engage in illegal spying on innocent American Citizens. Of course let us not ignore the long histories of the FBI and the BATF entrapping mentally deficient or mentally dupes to make them into domestic terror patsies. They always get exposed but their patsies still get convicted go to prison for long terms. What should really happen is that any Police Officer or FBI involved in such an entrapment should be the one charged with conspiracy to do the crime and should be convicted and sentenced to a long prison term. Right from the very start the FBI was set up illegally. It has no official registered charter according to the US Library of Congress and has no legal right to exist. Nonetheless it has existed for many years because it was set up as the action-agent or enforcer for the Federal Reserve System (aka Banksters) who themselves are the money manufacturing and distribution arm of the Khazarian Mafia (aka Babylonian Talmudic World Zionists or also known as the Rothschild World Zionists or Moneychangers). The FBI’s current job is to harass Whistle-blowers and cover up Khazarian Mafia Crimes. Any Whistle-blower who contacts the FBI to report crimes of course is likely to find that instead of the FBI investigating what they are reporting, the FBI instead comes after them bringing down the full power of the USG upon their heads, often harassing them, abusing them, putting them on “no work lists” and unless things have changed only recently, sometimes even murdering them using division 5 button men (“wetboys”). Besides all that there are still some very good, honest and ethical FBI agents. Many who try to do their jobs on these Khazarian Mafia crimes quickly find their investigations taken over by the Washington Field Office and buried forever with no action. Why is this? Because the WFO is directed by Khazarian Mafia Cutouts. Sadly there have been many who tried to investigate the Khazarian Mafia crimes such as their international pedophile/child sacrifice satanic network end up giving up and resigning, considering it a lost cause to try and go after crimes which are participated in and protected by the Khazarian Mafia. Can the FBI be cleaned up and do an acceptable, just or even heroic job enforcing Federal Laws fairly across the board even going after Khazarian Mafia operations? If done properly by men and women with integrity this can be done. If DHS is not eliminated now, what’s next? Will they deploy an Unconstitutional medically fraudulent and dangerous to our health mandatory vaccination program which will be used to inject mind-kontrol and population control compounds into We The People?
Provided by the incredible artist David Dees at DDees.com.
Or will DHS provoke a Civil War and go door to door seizing guns, murdering innocent civilians and taking the rest to their 750 FEMA “re-education, re-settlement camps” where they will be progressively and systematically exterminated? Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Conclusion: Now is the Time to completely defund Homeland Security. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its Fusion Centers and its TSA are basically Israeli Police State operations inside America on behalf of the Khazarian Mafia. It is realistic to view DHS as a private Israeli occupation Police State Army inside America doing Israeli espionage and covert warfare against America and “We The people.” Not only is this a slap in the face to any decent American, it is a violation of our US Constitution and Bill of Rights and all American RICO and espionage laws outlawing any foreign entity from infiltrating and conducting espionage and large scale organized crime inside America. It is time to completely defund DHS and destroy it forever. Some of the basic Alphabets can be reconfigured and cleaned up, getting rid of any of the corrupt criminals in high positions and all of the Khazarian mafia cutouts and assets. Any good agents can be transferred back to the agency they came from if it is still left intact. All fusion centers must be eliminated as must the TSA and its irradiating, gene-splitting Xray and dangerous scanners and all airport security must be reassigned back to each Airport Commission as before the criminal TSA was set up. All VIPR teams, as well as all sniper teams set up by craft with their silenced .338 Lapua magnum sniper rifles must be eliminated.
Social Psychologist with Doctorate from Major Midwest Big Ten University. Retired after serving the community for over 36 years during which time there were numerous contacts with those associated with Intel and Law Enforcement.
The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. Notices
Posted by Preston James, Ph.D on February 24, 2015, With 5299 Reads, Filed under Corruption, Of Interest, Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
May Contain Spoilers Print PageImage may be NSFW. Clik here to view.I've had to defend myself for loving "The War of the Roses" so much. The majority of people I've discussed it with found it too mean-spirited. I realize it deals with an ugly subject but this is a prime example of a movie being great at how it is about its core subject, no matter how touchy. This is one of my all-time favorite films.
Page design by Marie Haws.
"The War of the Roses" is surely the best thing Danny DeVito has ever done. In discussing him we may not be talking about the most renowned or prolific film director but I doubt there is any other living filmmaker who could have made a better movie with this particular material. It seems to fit his personality so well. DeVito is a guy that I can't help but admire. His sensational Louie DePalma character of "Taxi" fame was voted as the best ever on TV guide's 50Th anniversary and this could have never been done by just anybody reading the lines as written. Here is a round, balding, five foot man who became a star of the screen thanks to personality and true genius.
DeVito had a decent directorial debut with "Throw Momma from the Train," but in retrospect that movie seems like an exercise in the style that he mastered here. There is an incredible attention to detail in every shot and scene of "The War of the Roses." While watching it we can sense the director having a ball with this material, fully aware of the great script he got to work with and the exact approach it requires.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. "The War of the Roses" starts with a fairy tale feeling but quickly evolves into the blackest of comedies. This could have truly been a terrible movie in the wrong hands. The film depicts the journey of Barbara and Oliver Rose (Kathleen Turner and Michael Douglas) through two decades in their lives in a marriage takes them from love and happiness to mutual disgust. DeVito plays Gavin D'Amato, Oliver's friend and business partner who narrates the story to a poor soul of a client, a man of few words (or none) who Gavin realizes might be going in a path similar to that of our heroes. "The War of the Roses" is one of those rare comedies in which countless lines are memorable and hilarious, but what makes it unique is its visual style, told mostly through DeVito's own eye-level POV -- which makes all taller characters look like giants. There is a constant use of odd angles that seem to spring from the subject matter and never feel gratuitous. The film comes alive with countless visual and audio gags such as those showing the steam related to the "pissed-on fish" and the sizzling sound of frying onions while Olivier is stuck in the sauna, with his subsequent recovery by drinking what seems like a gallon bottle of Gatorade. The film is also full of oddities designed to constantly unsettle the audience, like the presence of the loud and overweight children and the constant handling of raw liver. What can one say about a comedy on divorce that manages to include a monster-truck jumping scene? Anything goes.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. One of the most enjoyable aspects of "The War of the Roses" is its merciless attitude toward lawyers, from Gavin's auto-critical attitude to Oliver's self grandiose poise. There's also Barbara's stone-faced attorney played by the late G.D. Spradlin, who will only dare to show a smile upon being referred to as a "tiny little infinitesimal worm-like prick" by Oliver (this surely tells him he has done his work properly). Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. "Roses" isn't even kind to the usually sacred children or animals groups, even though DeVito does relent for the briefest of moments by pardoning the life of Bennie the dog, which I guess spared the movie from the wrath of even more people. Was he right in caving in, if just for a second? Much like Roger does in his "A Fish Called Wanda" review, I'm perplexed by some audience's concern for on-screen animals and their simultaneous lack of the same for humans -- but in this case, DeVito's canine point was nonetheless made and his audience cringed (if only for the briefest of moments), which in retrospect should be enough.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Behind the greatness in "The War of the Roses" is the fact that no matter how outlandish the scenes and how silly the two main characters always end up looking, there is an implicit truth to them. As Robert DeNiro's Al Capone once said (regarding an all-together different subject) "we laugh because it's funny and we laugh because it's true." An old teacher of mine who taught about the peculiarities of Family Corporations, always used to say there can be no worst hatred than that between family members who once loved each other and I believe this explains why some people involved in family rifts end up doing things totally out of their character.
Barbara and Oliver Rose seem like nice and loving people when dealing with just about anybody else but each other. Then they get to play monsters. Even though there are plenty of psychological aspects to discuss from a subject of this nature, we have to remember this is not a movie about the causes of war so much as the fun of the war itself. Sure, it is rather obvious that Oliver became a controlling husband and has a knack for putting down his insecure wife, with Barbara in turn going completely "medieval" on him, something that even at the very end he cannot comprehend. "Love means never having to say you are sorry," but the Roses prove it surely can never hurt.
The film becomes a critique of materialism and consumerism as little by little the Roses destroy the contents of their tacky-taste house that they spent a lifetime collecting. The film finds the perfect excuse to claustrophobically keep these characters together all the way through as both refuse to relent on their absurd quest. We end up recalling the fire which burned their Christmas Tree and wish it had taken the whole house along, as it would have been to their benefit to rid themselves of the subject at the center of their dispute.
Much has been made about Turner and Douglas' screen chemistry, but what's truly amazing is that it translated to roles of absolute hate as well. "The War of the Roses" is yet another of the films of the period in which the latter played a character who was tormented by his leading lady (Demi Moore and, Glenn Close also come to mind) and I've always doubted this to be just a coincidence as he's always seemed to have a talent for playing the victim of strong female figures. Gavin recalls his father telling him "men can never outdo women when it comes to love and revenge" and right or wrong, this clearly became this film's personal philosophy.
Whatever both character's numerous faults, only Barbara is depicted as wholly cold-hearted from a certain point onward, going so far to reject Oliver in her last breath. This is the reason why I can personally explain the slightest of personal sympathies only for Oliver, though I realize this kind of reaction may also depend on the sex and personal experiences of each individual viewer.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. "The War of the Roses" is relentless in its approach. We are shocked when two thirds into this ride Gavin tells his client: "so far this was a normal divorce story, but you may need a drink to listen to the rest" and the last chapter certainly doesn't prove him wrong. The violence here sometimes resembles a road-runner cartoon but the movie never ceases to be funny.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Upon its release, "Roses" was heavily criticized for its nasty, unhappy ending but the truth of the matter is that any kind of reconciliation between these characters would have felt phony, as the couple we've grown to know have nothing to do with the concept of happiness. At any rate, when the credits roll we realize it was the DeVito character that gradually became the central focus of the story and he in turn has become a voice of reason, a loving husband and an overall good man. Heck, he's even become a lawyer willing to yield his fee for his fellow man. Now that's your happy ending right there.
Couple married 67 years holds hands in final hours together
ETonline - Remember in The Notebook, how Noah went off to World War II and wrote a love letter to Allie for each day he was gone (even though she never wrote back because her mom hid them from her)? And they somehow managed to overcome all the obstacles and end up together, married, with kids? And then Allie got dementia and Noah had to read her their love story, so she’d come back to them? And then they both died, together, in bed? NEWS: Find out why Gosling tried to have McAdams kicked off The Notebook This story is just like that... Well, mostly. Floyd and Violet Hartwig met when they were in elementary school in Fresno, but didn’t start going together until World War II, when Floyd enlisted in the Navy and the two reunited at the Rainbow Ballroom in Fresno. They exchanged more than 100 letters while Floyd was fighting overseas. The Fresno Bee They married in 1947 while Floyd was on leave, and after he was honorably discharged the following year, Floyd and “Vi” started a farm back in Fresno. “They chopped cotton and fed turkeys side by side,” their obituary says. They also had three children -- Donna, Carol, and Kenneth -- four grandchildren, and ten great-grandchildren. The Fresno Bee Violet was suffering from dementia, and in January, Floyd was diagnosed with kidney failure and given weeks to live. On Feb. 11, surrounded by family, 90-year-old Floyd and 89-year-old Violet laid in their hospice beds, their children pushing them together so their parents could hold hands. The Fresno Bee After 67 years of marriage, Floyd passed first. Five hours later, Violet joined him. “They had a connection, and I think that connection just came more and more, especially in the last months of their lives,” their daughter, Donna, told The Fresno Bee. “My dad could hardly walk and his main concern was my mom.” We think their love could do anything they wanted it to. Here are a few movies that made us cry just as much as The Notebook: less
FRESNO, Calif. (AP) — After spending 67 years together as devoted husband and wife, there was no question how Floyd and Violet Hartwig would end their lives — together.
Sensing the couple was close to death, their children pushed their two hospice beds together and gently placed their father's hand in the mother's palm. Floyd, 90, died first. Violet, 89, followed five hours later. They died Feb. 11 at home, just as they had wished, the family said.
"They wanted to go together," their daughter, Donna Scharton, said Thursday. "It was meant to be that way." Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
The two knew each other as children, growing up in the Central California farming community of Easton. Romance sparked at a local dance hall one night when Floyd, a decorated Navy sailor, was home on shore leave. They were married on Aug. 16, 1947, and while away Floyd showered Violet with affection through love letters the family cherishes. Returning home for good, the two raised three children on their small farm, growing cotton and raising turkeys. Violet helped on the ranch and kept the house. She prepared breakfast early each morning for her husband, seeing him off to work as a ranch foreman and delivering eggs. "They were dedicated to each other," Scharton said. "Even other people who met them said they had that connection." The couple, who had four grandchildren and 10 great-grandchildren, remained active until recently. Around the holidays, the family noticed that Violet's dementia had worsened, and in late January a doctor said Floyd's failing kidneys gave him two weeks to live. The family moved the couches from the living room of their ranch house, making space for the hospice beds. Cynthia Letson said that after her grandfather passed, they told her grandmother that she could go, too. They told Violet that Floyd was waiting for her. Letson said her grandparents are a positive example at a time with too many broken marriages.
"It would be nice if the world got back to the core of marriage," Letson said. "I don't think people realize that anymore. They need to go back to the basics that marriage is forever."
9/11 FALSE FLAG ALLOWED NATO TO OFFICIALLY DECLARE AND START THE THIRD WORLD WAR IN 2001.CHECK HOW MANY PEOPLE THE SATANIC (ATHEIST) WEST AND COMMUNISM ALREADY MURDERED BETWEEN 1945 AND 2001!
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Of course, there was such a thing as western civilisation, a great one, maybe even the greatest ever in human history, even if it was decadent from day one!Islamic civilisation too climbed to the very top but did not outlive the onslaught of western civilisation, which took the best from Islam and Muslims and moved forward, and at such a pace in the past century that it leaves us baffled and still asking the question: how did they do it in such a short time?Where did all this science and technology appear all of a sudden?The anti-Old Testament Judaic Qabbalah, the more recent Illuminati, and the mysterious Nicolas Tesler (and others) might provide us with some answers, but this is not enough, or is it?Western science, technology and finances proved lethal to most nations on the planet.Although it has benefited Europe and its White colonies established on stolen lands, around half of the population of those same nations are still unable to cope with their everyday life unless they traffic in drugs, weapons, get involved in daily crime, deception and immorality, provide their governments with labour and money to wage genocidal wars abroad that always enrich their Élite at their own expense, at the expense of truth, freedom, justice and morality, and at the expense of the conquered, unarmed and defenceless nations who are regularly slaughtered by the millions and the survivors forced to slave for them forever.Their own bankers' and Communist wars and revolutions, bankers' WWI and bankers' WWII have caused over 100 million deaths, and made them the literal owner of most of the land and sea masses of the planet, including its outer space, sun, sky and rain.
But, while many people have been talking nonstop about WWIII, I have witnessed that war, although of a different kind, going on at least since 1948 when the UK, the US, France and their Chinese, Indian and Russian acolytes, and other vassals like Canada and Australia, as well as conquered Germany, stole Palestine from its people and gave it to an army of anti-Old Testament Judaic terrorists, racists, cut-throats, ethnic cleansers, and perverts calling themselves ISRAEL!I know that I always write in Chinese and almost no one understands it except the Chinese, but the fact is that those who pretend not to understand plain standard English or plain academic French, learn those languages from the media where the meanings of words are always modified according to the politics of the day, but I never make that fatal (for the victims) mistake.So, my mind is rarely cluttered with their slogans and meaningless magical words (in all European vernacular) meant only to further a usurious banking and bloodthirsty military agenda for the conquest of the whole world, its lands, seas, space and riches, for the extermination of the undesirable inhabitants of the earth (some 90% of it!) that are causing them nightmares and big deficits in their stolen treasuries.
I am not an expert, not a scholar, not a scientist, not a leader of humans, but I am trained in noticing and understanding what is happening around me and a little further.I am opposed to crime and would like to live in a country (a world) under the rule of law that defends freedom, truth, justice and morality.It is an admitted fact that geniuses from US America and elsewhere supposedly failed to notice what was happening around them for centuries and failed to even understand the truth or falsehood of such a recent event as 9/11.All their modern politics are based on their hatred of Adolph Hitler's National Socialism, of Islam and Islamic civilisation, of Arabs, Arabic language, and Muslims, and on the Judaic Holocaust or Shoah Dogma and Industry.They live under totalitarianism where it suffices to say an individual or an entire nation is SUSPECT of a crime (fabricated by themselves) and that individual or nation is or can be immediately terminated in all legality.In other words there is no Law meant to deliver Justice, only to oppress and control the masses!There is no Education System except to indoctrinate and mind control!There is no finance system except to rip us all of our hard earned wages.There is no public services except that they benefit the wealthy and provide the worst service for the masses!
Like the bought and paid for Judges say: In my Court, truth is no defence!This is pathetic.Even to tell or write the truth or to defend your client with "too much zeal" has become a crime.Sylvia Stolz is one such victims who has been sentenced for jail terms on two occasions for the same "crimes" that have to do with Jewish supremacism, their fabricated Holocaust dogma and industry.Like the bought and paid for fraudulent US President George W. Bush who arrogantly said to the Afghani government that Usama was behind 9/11 and that he did not require or give a damn about evidence nor would he provide any.MIGHT MAKES RIGHT IS THE OLD NEW RELIGION OF THE WEST!
Because of my total independence, my findings and stand regarding religion, God, politics, finances, culture, art, music, poetry, morality and so on, I lost practically all my friends and family.This is to show how much and how far the gangrene has grown and the total zombification of the enslaved masses has been successful.The main conspirators are calling people like me conspiracy theorists, but this is their strategy, for example, labelling their victims as the terrorists when they are the main and only terrorists in existence.But, I am not paid to say or write anything.The urge comes from within and nobody can ever stop me except through my loved ones who they will use to blackmail me.I saw Justice not only systematically delayed in the West, but totally absent, and I know what I am talking about having had to deal with it for at least 35 years of my professional life.And there is nobody who can convince me that there is any kind of justice in the current system that the Empire has also imposed on all the conquered lands.
The notorious lying media tells the whole world what is happening when all or most of it is lies, and so many of us, and in particular the media addicts, believe them except for a few people like me and thousands of experts, analysts and scholars who have put their career and even lives at risk to tell the ungrateful and terrorised world the truth.Regarding so many false flag operations, we are shown the same live and still footage of what has allegedly happened, and most of it is lies, fabrications, make believe, all in plain sight, and we keep on living (as happy slaves) as if all is all right.
BAFS
28th of February 2015
GHYSLAINE ROC, LA VIERGE ROUGE RÉINCARNÉE ET LA RÉVOLUTION ISLAMIQUE !
Violent clashes break out during anti-Islam march in Newcastle city centre with hundreds of far-right protesters met by MP George Galloway leading a rival demonstration
Violent clashes in Newcastle as 400 far-right anti-Islam protesters demonstrate as part of Pegida movement
Rally was met by a 2,000-strong counter-protest led by Respect MP George Galloway who branded them 'Nazis'
Organisers of Pegida - Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of the West - insisted protest would be peaceful
But scuffles broke out and men with bloodied faces could be seen being dragged to the ground by police officers
Five men from anti-Islam protest arrested on suspicion of assault, breach of peace and being drunk and disorderly
Pegida anti-Islam movement has swept sections of Europe and started last year in Dresden, Germany
Police arrested five people for various offences in connection with today's demonstration in Newcastle
Published: 14:54, 28 February 2015 | Updated: 18:13, 28 February 2015
There were violent clashes on the streets of Newcastle today as hundreds of demonstrators from controversial anti-Islam group Pegida were met by a 2,000-strong counter-protest.
Around 400 people from the far-right group were shouted down by the counter-demonstration, with scuffles breaking out as the rally made its way through the city centre, leading to five arrests.
The rival demonstrations against the anti-Islam march were led by Respect MP George Galloway who spoke at the pro-Islam rally, branding the far-right protesters a 'German Nazi group'.
Scroll down for video
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
A man is wrestled to the ground as violent clashes take place in Newcastle city centre as an anti-Islam march is met by a counter protest
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
An officer grapples with this man, attempting to hold him still while his colleague handcuffs him during the arrest process
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
A handcuffed man with a bloodied face is led into the back of a police van after he was arrested at this afternoon's rally
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
There were violent clashes on the streets of Newcastle today as demonstrators from controversial anti-Islam group Pegida were met by a counter-protest
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Police hold back members of the Pegida far-right group as they demonstrate against the perceived 'anti-Islamisation' of Britain
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Five people were arrested as scuffles broke out within the Pegida rally, on suspicion of assault, breach of the peace and being drunk and disorderly
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Seven-year-old Afif Uzzaman, pictured, from Newcastle upon Tyne joined with counter protesters who were objecting to Pegida's march
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Flags of England and the United Kingdom fly as a woman address the Pegida rally of around 400 far-right protesters
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
This woman posed in front of a line of police officers keeping the rival groups of protesters apart as they demonstrated in Newcastle today
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
The demonstrations against the anti-Islam march were led by Respect MP George Galloway who spoke at the rally, branding the far-right protesters a 'German Nazi group'
Organisers from Pegida insisted the rally would be entirely peaceful, but five people were arrested amid a heavy police presence in Newcastle's city centre.
The five men, all from and the anti-Islam rally, were arrested on a range of including suspicion of assault, being drunk and disorderly and breaching the peace.
Mr Galloway, MP for Bradford West, addressed the counter-protest: 'All right-thinking people in Britain condemn the idea of a German Nazi group coming to the north east of England trying to stir up trouble.
'The vast majority of British people respect that and the people who are on here on the counter-demonstration are representing millions.
'We have enough problems in Britain without Germans coming over here and causing more. We have problems in Britain without racism and Islamophobia being further stoked.'
Mr Galloway, who travelled to the North East in his Mercedes, said he was not anti-German. 'I love Germans, I'm driving a German car, but this is one German import we don't want.'
Police arrested five people following today's sporadic violent outbreaks.
A 37-year-old man from Newcastle was arrested for assault, while two others, aged 43 and 54 were arrested on suspicion of being drunk and disorderly. The final two people arrested were a 17-year-old youth and a 20-year-old man from Halifax who were detained for breach of the peace.
Paul Weston, leader of the obscure far-right Liberty GP political party, told followers at the rally that Muslims would soon 'take over' Britain.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
A far larger gounter demonstration took place in Newcastle today, pictured, with representatives from several trade unions
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Around 400 people joined the Pegida rally (pictured), the first protest of its kind in Britain after a series of demonstrations in Europe
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Their demonstration was met by a counter protest of around 2,000 people, who gathered for speeches in Newcastle city centre
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
A tattooed man pokes out his tongue as Union Jacks fly in the background on the Pegida side of the police line
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Pegida - whose German acronym means Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of the West - peaked last month in Dresden when 25,000 people attended a rally and has now made its way to Britain
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Protesters march during the first rally in Britain from the anti-Islam group Pegida, with around 400 gathering in Newcastle
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Police separate the counter-demonstration from the far-right group, as thousands lined the streets to condemn the anti-Islam protest
THE ANTI-ISLAM PROTEST THAT'S SNOWBALLED FROM HUNDREDS IN DRESDEN TO THOUSANDS ACROSS EUROPE
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Pegida leader Lutz Bachmann was pictured posing as Adolf Hitler
Pegida started in Dresden, in Germany, last October as far-right activists gathered weekly in the city to demonstrate against what they perceive as the Islamisation of Germany and Europe.
The protests rapidly grew in size - from hundreds to around 25,000 - and spread into Austria, Switzerland, Norway, Spain, Belgium and now Britain.
The group has sought to distance itself from the far-right, saying in its position paper posted on Facebook that it is against 'preachers of hate, regardless of what religion' and 'radicalism, regardless of whether religiously or politically motivated'.
It has also banned any neo-Nazi symbols and slogans at its rallies, however it was mired in scandal when its leader Lutz Bachmann was pictured posing as Adolf Hitler.
He was forced to stand down as the group's leader after a furious backlash to the photograph, which he insisted was a joke.
Pegida's leaders have singled out Muslim immigrants in their speeches, but the movement has broadened into one against immigrants from all backgrounds.
A particular target has been 'economic refugees', or asylum seekers who they say are seeking a better standard of living in Germany.
Paul Weston, leader of the obscure far-right Liberty GP political party, told followers at the rally that Muslims would soon 'take over' Britain.
'That is exactly what they will do if we quietly do nothing,' he told the crowd. 'We have to fight back.'
Pegida - whose German acronym means Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of the West - peaked last month in Dresden when 25,000 people attended a rally, but its popularity faded when one of its leaders was pictured posing as Hitler.
A number of further protests in Germany were also cancelled following fears they were at risk of terrorist attacks.
Dr Jacqui Rodgers, a university lecturer, was on the counter-demonstration which attracted a cross-section of people of different faiths.
She said: 'I think it is really important for us to unite as a community and make it very clear to organisations that are trying to get a foothold in the UK that we will not tolerate their attitude and we won't accept their racist and fascist policies.'
This woman with a tattooed finger shouts angrily towards a group of police officers in Newcastle tasked with keeping the peace
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
A man shouts as the rally makes it way past Bigg Market in Newcastle, as the protest's leader said Muslims would 'take over' Britain
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Pegida supporters holding a flag from Golden Dawn - a far-right political party in Greece - are escorted away from the counter-demonstration
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Hundreds of activists from the Newcastle Unites group were out in force to demonstrate against the far-right rally
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Organisers from Pegida insisted the rally would be entirely peaceful, but pictures show several arrests being made and a heavy police presence
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
This man raised his hand in a defiant gesture with his hooded top featuring an AR15 assault rifle covered in an American flag
But Pegida rally organiser Donna Trainor said: 'Islam is not a race, it is a religion. (The term) racist shouldn't be on the table.
'Pegida raises awareness. We want the Government to take notice and take Jihadis and Muslim extremists off the street.'
Unemployed Wendy Ellison, 46, from Durham, took her bulldogs Willow and Betty to the Pegida rally.
She said: 'It's no good sitting in the house, shouting at the telly.
'I feel our country is messed up now. It doesn't feel like Britain any more.'
Northumbria Police said both protests passed without any major problems and that the arrests were for 'isolated incidents'.
WOMAN ARRESTED AS ANTI-UKIP PROTESTERS TARGET PARTY CONFERENCE IN MARGATE
Protesters also clashed in Margate as an estimated 250 people rallied against Ukip.
Anti-Ukip demonstrators from Thanet Stand Up To UKIP outnumbered about 50 party supporters who were in the seaside town for the annual two-day conference.
One woman was arrested on suspicion of common assault.
A Kent Police spokeswoman said all protest groups were co-operating with police.
'There have been some very minor verbal exchanges,' she said.
'No-one has been injured and the protest has generally been conducted peacefully.
'Officers remain in the local area to reassure the public and to respond to any incidents if required.'
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Protesters also clashed in Margate as an estimated 250 people rallied against Ukip, with one woman arrested on suspicion of common assault
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+27
Anti-Ukip demonstrators from Thanet Stand Up To UKIP outnumbered about 50 party supporters who were in the seaside town for the annual two-day conference
Georgia judge jails Muslim woman for wearing headscarf to court
• Two women barred from entering courtroom in recent days • Sabreen Abdulrahmaan sentenced to 10 days in jail
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Lisa Valentine was arrested after a Georgia judge charged her with contempt of court after refusing to take off her headscarf. Photograph: John Amis/AP
A city judge in Georgia has in the past eight days barred two Muslim women wearing Islamic headscarves from entering his courtroom, jailing one, and prompting an inquiry from the civil rights office at the US department of justice.
Judge Keith Rollins of Douglasville, Georgia, yesterday ordered Lisa Valentine, 41, to jail after she refused to remove her scarf before entering the courtroom, citing rules governing appropriate dress. Last week, Sabreen Abdulrahmaan was forced to leave Rollins's court before her son's probation hearing because she would not remove her scarf.
"It's a religious right," Valentine said. "It's our constitutional right that we can have our religious practices, no matter if it's a courtroom or not. He's supposed to be handing out justice, not taking away civil rights."
Valentine said she sought to accompany her nephew to a traffic hearing yesterday but was told by a court security officer that she could not enter the courtroom with her headscarf on. She said she refused to remove it and turned to leave, saying, "This is bullshit".
Security officers handcuffed her and brought her before Rollins, who sentenced her to 10 days in jail when she declined to defend her actions at the security checkpoint, her husband Omar Hall said. Valentine, an insurance underwriter, was forced to take off the scarf and don an orange jumpsuit, chained and put aboard a jail bus with men and women.
"It felt like I was naked, because that's how I feel without my hijab," Valentine said. "You could have taken off my clothes and it would have felt the same way."
Her husband phoned an Islamic civil rights organisation and sought an attorney, and she was released without explanation after about seven hours.
"Judge Keith Rollins has inexplicably, blatantly usurped our innate human rights as American citizens," Hall said.
Douglasville police told the Atlanta Journal Constitution that Valentine was jailed for violating a policy barring headgear in the court. Neither court officials nor the police department returned calls seeking comment. Reached by the Associated Press, Rollins declined to comment on Valentine's case. "It's an issue of religious freedom, it's an issue of access to the American legal system," said Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Washington-based Islamic civil rights advocacy group, which advised Valentine and Hall on the case. "There are all kinds of implications that you can take form this troubling incident."
The US department of justice is reviewing the matter, according to spokesman Jamie Hais. Hooper said that Eric Treene, special council for religious discrimination at the justice department's civil rights division, was examining the case.
Valentine's case was Rollins's second dispute with a hijab-clad woman in a week. Last week, Abdulrahmaan, a 55-year-old community organiser, went to Douglasville municipal court to observe her son's probation hearing. Security officers outside the courtroom initially denied her entry, saying Rollins does not allow scarves in the courtroom. She made it into the courtroom, but once inside a bailiff motioned for her to remove her scarf. She told him she was a Muslim, but then left when he started to approach her.
"There are a lot of prejudices here," Abdulrahmaan said. News of Valentine's case, "just sent my blood pressure all the way up".
Hooper of the Council on American-Islamic Relations said the matter does not merely affect Muslims.
"What if you're a Jewish man wearing a skull cap? What if you're a Catholic nun wearing a habit?" Hooper asked. "All would be denied access to this judge's courtroom. We need to know what's going here and why this has apparently been going on for so long."
Dr. Phil: I Believe My Cousin is Squandering Her Inheritance on a Love Scam 2/24/2015
"I Believe My Cousin is Squandering Her Inheritance on a Love Scam" February 24, 2015 Sarah, 46, admits she has sent more than $1 million to her boyfriend, “Chris,” whom she met online just over a year ago but has yet to see in person. Sarah’s cousin, Crystal, believes Sarah is being conned into squandering her inheritance. Dr. Phil’s viewers join the effort to help track down the man behind the images of “Chris.” Is this a scam?
'We are in love... and I am 95% certain he's telling the truth': Woman defends her decision to wire $1.4 MILLION to online lover in Africa she's never met
Twice-divorced Sarah met man named Chris Olsen (Jewish???) online 18 months ago
Said he is from Italy, moved to U.S. 18 years ago, is in Africa for work
They have never met, he has been in South Africa, Nigeria and Benin
She has wired him $1.4m for bail, lawyers, lost credit cards, hotel bills
Sarah told Dr Phil she believes he loves her and will come home
Published: 04:03, 1 March 2015 | Updated: 14:58, 1 March 2015
A woman has defended her decision to sent $1.4 million to her online lover in Africa - who she has never met.
Twice-divorced Sarah met Chris Olsen online 18 months ago.
Though the mysterious man's accent has changed over time, and he keeps asking for money to be wired to various different countries, Sarah insists she is '95 per cent certain' that he is telling her the truth.
Despite his numerous attempts to come home so they can be together, she says, he keeps getting arrested on false charges.
SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+2
Convinced: Sarah told Dr Phil she still believes in love and is certain her online lover is telling the truth
In an interview with Dr Phil, Sarah explained that they speak for hours on the phone each day.
She described the moment they met on the internet: 'An attractive person came on there and said "wow you look like you wouldn't hurt a fly". I said "wow this guy's really handsome, I can't believe he's talking to me!"'
He told her he was called Chris Olsen, who hailed from Milan but moved to the U.S. 18 years ago.
Romance: She claims they speak for hours on the phone and though his accent has changed from Italian to African she has not wavered in her belief that he loves her
And days later, he sent the first of many requests for money.
She has now sent him $1.4 million in total for hotel bills, calling cards, lawyers, an expired visa, stolen credit cards, and bail.
Last June, she even had to sell an apartment she owned to wire him $550,000 bail.
However, she believes he is trying his utmost to make it home.
Sarah concedes that there are suspicious elements to his story: 'When I first started talking to him,' she told Dr Phil, 'He sounded Italian now his accent's kind of changed I don't know if he's adapted to where he's at... in Benin.'
Buckingham Palace naked nude man escapes out of window and falls down Buckingham Palace man: Watch shocking clip of man appearing to scale royal residence Kate middleton, queen elizabeth, prince harry, prince william,window,Buckingham parade,naked man parade
One is not amused! Internet hoaxer posts video of naked man 'escaping Buckingham Palace bedroom window during the Changing of the Guard'
A video on the internet claims to show a naked man in Buckingham Palace
The man appears to be climbing down from a window using a bed sheet
The drama happens during the middle of Changing of the Guard
After a few feet, the man plummets from his improvised climbing rope
Buckingham Palace said they do not wish to comment on the video
Published: 21:23, 27 February 2015 | Updated: 21:34, 28 February 2015
A video clip claiming to show a naked man climbing down the facade of Buckingham Palace on a bed sheet has gone viral on the internet.
The video show a couple of tourists standing on Constitution Hill, outside Green Park as the Changing of the Guard is taking place.
As the video zooms towards Buckingham Palace, it appears as if a naked man has clambered out of a window onto a bed sheet and attempts to lower himself to the ground.
These are the amazing scenes as a naked man apparently climbs from the window of Buckingham Palace
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+7
The daredevil is making his escape just as the Changing of the Guard is taking place
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+7
Two tourists seem almost oblivous to the ongoing drama as they wait for the soldiers to pass by
Despite a naked man just yards away the soldiers seem completely unaware of what is happening over their shoulder.
The man is seen slowly lowering himself down the rope made from bed sheets over the course of several seconds.
However, after about ten feet, the man loses his grip and plummets to the ground some 20 feet below him.
Yet, despite the incident, nobody in the crowd or any of the soldiers appear to react.
However, the 45 second video is believed to be an elaborate hoax.
When contacted, Buckingham palace declined to comment on the video.
The Metropolitan Police said they have not received any reports of a naked man dangling from a Buckingham Palace window.
The London Ambulance Service said they have not received any calls to treat a naked man suffering from injuries sustained from a fall from a rope made of bed sheets.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+7
The video man zooms in as he notices the naked man who has dark coloured hair escaping the window
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+7
The man appears to have almost made it as he passes a lower window which has the blinds closed
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+7
The man, who appears to be only wearing his left sock, now seems to be in trouble
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
+7
Shockingly, the man plummets to his doom after he loses his grip on the improvised climbing rope
Share or comment on this article
4.5k
shares
VIP paedophile ring 'abused teenage boy INSIDE Buckingham Palace and Balmoral Castle'
The boy, then just 16, told how he was the victim of “exploitation of the highest order” - the claims could now be the subject of a police investigation
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.VIEW GALLERY A teenage boy working at Buckingham Palace revealed he was groomed and sexually abused by a VIP paedophile ring there. The lad was also assaulted at the Royal Family’s Scottish retreat Balmoral, according to shocking Home Office files, reports the Sunday People. In a heartbreaking note, the boy – then just 16 – told how he was the victim of “exploitation of the highest order”. The chilling claims could now be the subject of a police investigation into historic allegations of child sex abuse in the 1970s and 80s – linked to MPs and powerful figures. The disturbing account was passed directly to the then Home Secretary Leon Brittan but he ruled it was “not practical” to investigate. Campaigning Labour MP Tom Watson said: “I’m sure the Palace will want to co-operate with any inquiry.” A Palace spokesman said: “The Royal Household takes any allegation of this nature seriously and would act to address any specific allegations or investigate specific information.” Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Shadow on castle: Balmoral, where staff allegedly heard the boy scream at night The Sunday People and the investigations website Exaro have established that the Home Office file contains evidence of a letter written by the boy’s mother. She wrote to campaigning MP Geoffrey Dickens, fearing that her son had been groomed by a paedophile ring while working at the Buckingham Palace kitchens. The boy was 16 at the time, putting him below the age of homosexual consent which was then 21 in England. In Scotland homosexuality was still totally illegal. Mr Dickens said at the time: “The boy told his parents he had been sexually abused by members of the Royal Household at the Palace. “I am concerned the Palace could be part of a chain supplying young men to paedophiles in the diplomatic service.” Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Demand: Labour MP Tom Watson is sure the Palace will co-operate with any inquiry The 16-year-old went to work at the Palace in the early 1970s. After a few months his family noticed he was acting strangely. A family friend told Exaro: “Things were OK when he first joined the Palace staff. "After a few months, things started to turn a little strange.” After what the source described as an “incident” at Balmoral, the royal family’s Scottish home, the boy’s parents were told by a close friend who also worked at Buckingham Palace that their son was being sexually abused there. The source added: “They got wind of this after an incident at Balmoral when he screamed in the night.” Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Concerned: Desperate parents wrote to MP Geoffrey Dickens for help The concerned friend, who worked for the royals at the time, immediately alerted the boy’s parents. He told them: “This is something that you should have nothing to do with.” Reports from the time reveal further details of the boy’s ordeal. One says his parents discovered a handwritten note from him. It read: “What Buckingham Palace did for me was exploitation of the highest order.” The boy’s mother said at the time: “My son was happy and normal until he went there. "Then he changed completely. He refused to talk to us or discuss what he was up to.” Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Employer: Buckingham Palace The boy’s father also claimed that young Palace staff were lavished with expensive gifts for “entertaining men”. He added: “In some cases Palace officials were involved. “Afterwards, the servants got good references to take up posts abroad with wealthy employers.” According to the Home Office files, the desperate parents wrote to Geoffrey Dickens for help. The MP raised the mother’s concerns with the Home Secretary in 1983. But Mr Dickens received a reply saying Leon Brittan felt it would not be practical to carry out a detailed investigation. He wrote: “I need hardly assure you that the Royal Household is extremely concerned at these unsubstantiated allegations and it is, of course, their policy to take every step to avoid an occurrence of such as is alleged. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Deputy: The 16-year-old was approached by notorious paedophile Sir Peter Hayman There is nobody currently employed in the Royal Household who is under the age of 18.” Mr Brittan indicated that her son had worked at Buckingham Palace for a year, adding: “It is extremely difficult to comment on the accuracy of the allegations in the letter.” But an even more chilling development is contained in the files, lending weight to the claims that a paedophile VIP ring was linked to the Palace. During his time at Buckingham Palace, the 16-year-old was approached by notorious paedophile Sir Peter Hayman and was asked to work for him in Canada, where he was ambassador. Hayman has been identified as a member of the VIP paedophile ring operating in Westminster and is known to have had royal connections. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Scandal: The site of the former Elm Guest House in Barnes He was desperate to have the boy working for him, even writing to his parents to ask them about taking his son on as a footman. Hayman said the boy would need winter clothes. The parents never found out how Hayman knew their son. But the source said: “They knew there was something wrong.” The parents were so concerned by Hayman’s approach that they attempted to stop their son working for him, the family friend explained. Exaro has established that the boy’s parents intervened to stop him going to Canada to work for Hayman. Mr Watson, who has led the campaign for a full-scale inquiry into claims of child sex abuse at the heart of the Establishment, said: “In light of what we now know, any allegation of sexual crimes regarding Peter Hayman should be thoroughly investigated. “He was protected by the Establishment at the time. “The full extent of how his conduct was covered up has not been explained.” Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.MP: Leon Brittan felt it would not be practical to carry out a detailed investigation The parents and their son have declined to comment on the allegations. But the revelations link Buckingham Palace to a paedophile network of MPs and powerful figures that operated over many years in the UK. Palace officials have already been linked to the notorious brothel the Elm Guest House in South West London. Police are investigating archives on Hayman in a bid to find his links to other Establishment paedophiles. "An abuse survivor, known as “Nick” to protect his identity, named one of his many VIP attackers as Hayman. Nick picked Hayman out from a collection of pictures that Exaro showed to him, placing him at abuse parties with other paedophiles. An appendix to a review by the Home Office last year reveals one of their missing files was called: “Sir Peter Hayman (1980-81 Papers Ex-Diplomat’s Intriguing Private Life).”
Faux-imam Chalghoumi : la vérité sur une escroquerie islamophobe.
Achtung!
Ce gentil Monsieur continue à utiliser et a répéter sans arrêt des termes empruntés aux slogans racistes des ennemis de l'Islam, des Arabes, et des Musulmans. Par exemple, un "Fatwa" n'est nullement synonyme de "Appel au meurtre"!
Et, il n'y a jamais eu de "terrorisme islamique" ou "d'Islamistes"!
Il est très éloquent, et, très bien renseigné, un grand érudit, mais commet, malheureusement, trop d'erreurs d'analyse.
BAFS
La vérité sur Hassen Chalghoumi et ses marionnettistes
Posté le samedi 11 août 2012 | Commentaires fermés
Published on 17 Mar 2013
La vérité sur Hassen Chalghoumi et ses marionnettistes par son ex nègre et conseiller Farid Hannache
Reprise de l'enquête de Malika Bennabi : « Faux-imam Chalghoumi : la vérité sur une escroquerie islamophobe », publiée sur le site Salamfm.fr le 5 aout 2012.
Enquête sur une caricature immature de la médiocrité et de la servilité, née de la violation de la laïcité et des relations incestueuses entre la politique, la police et la religion.
Sommaire : Le changement, c'est maintenant !
Du djihadisme au sionisme : itinéraire d'un marchand de tapis. Serviteur de l'ex tyran tunisien Ben Ali, du Député-Maire de Drancy Lagarde et de l'ex Président français Sarkozy.Marche contre l'islam radical avec les racistes néofascistes de Riposte laïque. Kadhafi-Chalghoumi ou NPNS-CIF: l'alibi islamiste. Islam & Chalghoumi : des hypocrisies explosives. De Lahore à Tel-Aviv. Les clichés néocolonialistes de certains journalistes. Les plaintes policières du mouchard mégalomane, du pleurnichard mythomane. De la guerre contre l'islam par les musulmans. De l'imam des juifs au donneur de leçons à la France et à l'Occident. Mosquée de Drancy : l'autre escroquerie ! Mosquée de Drancy & Conférence des Imams de France : business & trafic de Chalghoumi.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Par Malika Bennabi. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Mosquée de Drancy & Conférence des Imams de France : business & trafic de Chalghoumi. Le vrai imam de la mosquée de Drancy s’appelle cheikh Noureddine, imam d’origine comorienne. Cet imam a succédé à cheikh Houdeyyfa, imam d’origine égyptienne, ancien imam de Drancy depuis la construction de cette mosquée. Mais, parce que cet imam a refusé de suivre Chalghoumi dans son hystérie affairiste et islamophobe, Chalghoumi l’a chassé et dénoncé à la police comme islamiste sans-papier. Alors, il est parti et TOUS les dirigeants de la mosquée ont démissionné. Mais l’honneur de ces hommes pieux, honnêtes et généreux a été sali.
Chalghoumi n’a jamais été imam. Il n y’a aucune photo le montrant prêchant sur le Minbar, la chaire du Vendredi. Pourtant en juin 2009, avec les conseils et le financement du CRIF, il a créé la Conférence des Imams de France. Christine Boutin, l’ancienne ministre sarkozyste du logement, a été réquisitionné pour parrainer cette supercherie. Ce label lucratif pour se remplir les poches et ravir la couronne du représentant de l’islam de France. Cet écran de fumée pour salir, mystifier et embrumer l’image de l’islam, pour couvrir, justifier et enflammer l’islamophobie.
En 3 ans d’exercice, la Conférence des imams de France dont le trésorier a démissionné avec fracas, n’a enregistré aucun adhérent, aucun PV de réunion, mais elle a encaissé plusieurs subventions et soutiens : CRIF: Conseil Représentait des Institutions juives de France. ADL : Anti-diffamation Ligue, un lobby sioniste américain. Bnai Brith : la puissante loge maçonnique juive. Fondation Rothschild, dont le patronyme fait saliver et trembler la finance et la politique. Association France-Israël. UPJF : Union des Patrons des Juifs de France qui lui ont remis en 2011 le Prix de l’Amitié juive après l’avoir remis, l’année précédente, au ministre islamophobe Hortefeux…
Le couple de la honte Chalghoumi-Hortefeux : pile et face d’une même coupe nauséabonde !
Chalghoumi est donc un faux-imam, non pas parce qu’il n’a appris qu’une partie du Coran, mais parce qu’il le trahit. Même s’il était le fils du fondamentalisme Tabligh, Chalghoumi s’est révélé l’enfant gâté du despotisme du raïs tunisien et de l’affairisme des caïds et des vauriens… adopté par le sionisme parisien. C’est Jacques Attali qui a dit: « la bourgeoisie juive a décidé de financer les imams modérés. » mais c’est un faux-imam qui a raflé la mise !
Mosquée de Drancy : l’autre escroquerie !
La mosquée de Drancy est née d’un mensonge animé par des calculs politiciens. Comme l’a révélé Le Parisien dans son article « Quand le maire se félicite d’avoir menti… », le député-maire de Drancy, Jean-Christophe Lagarde, a caché aux habitants de se ville et mêmes aux élus de sa mairie le projet et le chantier de la mosquée qu’il était en train de construire. Lagarde a, ainsi, violé la laïcité et trompé les citoyens de Drancy. Officiellement, c’était une salle polyvalente. Une mosquée construite dans le secret, avec une forme architecturale bâtarde (apparence d’un gymnase), avec un emplacement éloigné des regards (entre une voie de chemin de fer et un terrain de foot), sans aucune communication, ne figurant même pas sur les panneaux de signalisation. Une mosquée née et inaugurée dans le plus grand secret, même le journal de la ville s’est gardé d’en parler ! Une mosquée dans l’ombre de Lagarde : érigée pour le servir et dirigée par son serviteur. Chalghoumi, qui tractait pour la campagne de Lagarde, a été parachuté par ce dernier Président de l’association qui dirige cette mosquée.
Le 14 février 2008 (soit un mois avant l’élection municipale), le conseil municipal a voté une convention d’occupation de cette salle entre la commune et l’association culturelle que préside Chalghoumi. Un bail renouvelable en février 2014… soit un mois avant la prochaine élection municipale ! Tout est calcul ! En contrepartie, Chalghoumi roule par Lagarde, et pas seulement pendant les élections !
Exemple, en Octobre 2009, Chalghoumi a placardé dans sa mosquée une virulente lettre recommandée adressée à Claude Bartolone pour défendre Lagarde. Extrait : « (…) déclarer et sous-entendre que la mosquée est née dans la nuit, en contrepartie d’un tractage électoral et de la soumission à un de vos adversaires politiques est une grave et néfaste insulte à notre communauté et à notre République. Je ne cesse de lutter contre les extrémistes, alors je suis scandalisé que des politiciens se réclamant de vous et de la laïcité, utilisent le lexique et les méthodes de l’Extrême-Droite. (…) je m’abstiendrai cette fois-ci de porter plainte, mais j’interpelle votre conscience pour interdire à vos collaborateurs de prendre la religion en otage, ou de jouer sur les divisions communautaires pour régler des comptes. (…) »
En profitant des fonds, fonctionnaires et services municipaux de Drancy, des bus aux HLM, de l’imprimerie aux techniciens, Chalghoumi est au service du seigneur sarkozyste de Drancy, Lagarde.
Chalghoumi utilise l’argent de la mosquée, l’argent de la mairie de Drancy (des contribuables français) et l’argent des Juifs pour nourrir ses folies de grandeur. Il utilise le titre d’imam pour couvrir ses bassesses. Chalghoumi venait en 2010 à la mosquée dans une Porsche beige. Il ne cesse de voyager et d’inviter beaucoup de monde dans les restaurants chics autour des Champs Elysées. Vanité, est-elle le dieu de Chalghoumi ?
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Serviteur de l’ex tyran tunisien Ben Ali, du Député-Maire de Drancy Lagarde et de l’ex Président français Sarkozy.
Entre Botzaris, siège parisien du parti de l’ex-dictateur Ben Ali, et Carthage, son ex-palais à Tunis, Chalghoumi était un serviteur dévoué et zélé. Il a donné le nom de plusieurs fidèles de la mosquée de Drancy, dénoncés comme intégristes anti-tunisiens, des innocents qui ont eu des problèmes avec la police tunisienne. Il a été mandaté et financé par Sakhr Al-Materi, le gendre du tyran Ben Ali, pour ouvrir une radio islamique en France. En s’affairant pour Ben Ali et Sarkozy, Chalghoumi a tissé des liens avec la belle-famille d’Eric Besson jusqu’ à ce qu’il arrive à se vendre à Tarak Ben Ammar. Avec son jet-privé et sa chaîne Nessma Tv, le milliardaire anti-islamiste a séduit et mis Chalghoumi, le culoté affairiste à la calotte blanche, dans sa poche.
Avec Sarkozy, il a redoublé de servitude. Chalghoumi était un agent d’embrigadement de Sarkozy, il reste une séquelle néfaste du sarkozysme. Il reste une tache de la politique sarkozyste communautariste, clientéliste, électoraliste… Il a affrété un Bus entre la mosquée de Drancy et le meeting de Villepinte du 11 mars 2012. Dans ce meeting électoraliste, le faux-imam était assis au premier rang et il a été salué par le candidat Sarkozy. A plusieurs reprises, Chalghoumi a appelé à voter Sarkozy dans les médias. Il a organisé plusieurs diners électoralistes dans la mosquée de Drancy et dans lesquels il a traité les socialistes de racistes et véhiculé « les 10 raisons pour que les musulmans ne votent pas Hollande ». C’est Biancarelli, ex chef du pôle politique de l’Elysée, qui lui a dit ce qu’il fallait dire à Mme Le Pen lors de leur rencontre au Grand Journal de Canal+. Les ordinateurs de « sa» mosquée conservent les stigmates et les empreintes de leur utilisation pour la campagne et la propagande sarkozystes. En récompense, Chalghoumi a été reçu pompeusement par Sarkozy dans son bureau à l’Elysée et par Guéant dans son bureau à Beauvau.
Chalghoumi : le 2ème bureau de la politique cynique !
A plusieurs reprises, il a chassé les femmes musulmanes de leur salle de prière pour en faire une salle de réception en honneur à ses invités du CRIF, de l’UMP, de l’Elysée ou de Beauvau. Ainsi, il a organisé, pendant la dernière présidentielle, plusieurs diners en honneur du Préfet Moutouh, bras-droit du Ministre Claude Guéant qui a tenté de lui créer, sur-mesure, un CFCM anti-islamiste pro-sarkosyste (un machin baptisé le CFML : Conseil des Français Musulmans Libres); Préfet Lambert, patron du 93 qui a mis en quarantaine le faux-imam pandant plus d’un an et demi ; Patrick Karam, Monsieur Communautarisme de Sarkozy ; Olivier Biancarelli, Conseiller politique de Sarkozy… Chalghoumi a fait de la mosquée de Drancy un théâtre électoraliste bling-bling, un défilé politicien avec des meetings communautaristes autour de ripailles en réponse aux sirènes clientélistes du sérail…
Après les présidentielles, Chalghoumi a récidivé avec les législatives pour servir le petit Sarkozy : Lagarde. Comme démontré auparavant, Chalghoumi est un agent, électoral ou communautaire, de Lagarde ; surtout, depuis que le seigneur de Drancy lui a offert l’achat et la propriété de la mosquée de Drancy.
D’ailleurs, que sont devenus les chèques et les dons faits par des fidèles et des bienfaiteurs pour acheter cette mosquée (3,3 millions €) ? Ne sont-ils pas détournés pour nourrir le train-de-vie du seigneur de la mosquée de Drancy ? Avec quel argent Chalghoumi paie-t-il son cuisinier personnel ?
Mais il n’ya pas que la carotte pour asservir et assujettir les arrivistes sans foi ni loi. Lagarde, qui a essayé de censurer le livre Pour l’islam de France, n’a pas hésité à utiliser le commissaire de Drancy et des agents des RG pour intimider et embrigader le faux-imam.
Chalghoumi n’a jamais représenté l’islam de France. Il a représenté l’islam de Sarkozy, l’islam de Ben Ali, l’islam de Lagarde… Chalghoumi est au service du Pouvoir en place ; il représente l’islam des Services…
Chalghoumi ne représente pas l’islam des Lumières. Cette posture paternaliste est une imposture raciste. Une grenouille de bénitier affairiste nourrie par les magouilles clientélistes. Ce pantin folklorique est une insulte à la langue française. Cet indigène, indigent, indigeste et indigne, représente l’islam des béni oui-oui. Chalghoumi est une caricature de la médiocrité. C’est un rejeton immature né de la violation de la laïcité et qui perpétue le viol de la laïcité. C’est le produit des relations incestueuses entre la politique et la religion. Ce machin narcissique est une machine de manipulation politique et d’ingérence policière dans l’islam de France.
Chalghoumi a attrapé le BHL, ce virus qui sévit dans le microcosme parisien, qui gangrène la République et dont Caroline Fourest est un fulgurant et inquiétant cas clinique : Bobards partout, Haine des autres, Louanges à soi. Chalghoumi n’est pas seulement le nom d’un syndrome de l’islamophobie, mais celui d’une infection morale entretenue par un cancer typiquement français : un clergé composé d’intellectuels faussaires. Alors, d’autres plaies et d’autres visages remplaceront la métastase Chalghoumi, mais la France restera infectée par le BHL.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Du djihadisme au sionisme : itinéraire d’un marchand de tapis.
La métamorphose de Chalghoumi (pour devenir la star du CRIF) est le résultat de la corbeille de ses gagne-pains qui s’est réduite comme une peau de chagrin. Au-delà de certains boulots comme Grand-frère à la RATP, de certaines ressources comme le RMI, autres allocations sociales ou la sous-location clandestine du sous-sol de son pavillon, Chalghoumi avait 3 ressources financières garanties: l’argent en noir des mosquées, les commissions de son agence de voyage pour le pèlerinage et son salaire de Fedex à l’aéroport de Roissy.
Entre 2004 et 2005, des notes des RG, Renseignements Généraux, dénoncent, comme l’a révélé Le Point et autres médias, Chalghoumi comme prédicateur intégriste qui prêche le djihad pour les hommes et le voile intégral pour les femmes. Chalghoumi était un leader du mouvement fondamentaliste Tabligh, il sillonnait les banlieues pour pratiquer le prosélytisme pakistanais. Chalghoumi devait être expulsé par le Ministère de l’Intérieur, mais il sera sauvé par l’intervention de Thami BREZ, ex Président de l’UOIF, vrai imam, avec un vrai DEA en sciences politiques et un vrai cœur. Mais Chalghoumi va le remercier en diabolisant l’UOIF et les Frères Musulmans.
En 2006, Fedex licencie Chalghoumi, lui retire son badge de l’aéroport CDG en écho aux accusations des RG qui le soupçonnaient d’être un recruteur djihadiste et par peur de ses activités de prosélytisme intégriste.
En 2007 les Etats-Unis interdisent leur territoire à Chalghoumi dont le passeport est profané par un tampon rouge. Malgré les mutations et les courbettes de l’ex-intégriste, l’ambassade américaine refuse de lui accorder un visa. Mais peut-être que le tapis rouge que lui a déroulé Tel-Aviv va lui ouvrir les portes de Washington. Les voies de l’odieux sont pénétrables !
En 2007, l’Arabie Saoudite retire à Chalghoumi le visa d’exploitation pour l’organisation des pèlerinages accordé à son agence, Hidaya Caravane. En fait, pendant plusieurs années, plusieurs pèlerins se sont plaints auprès de l’ambassade saoudienne de Paris des arnaques et des abus de Chalghoumi.
En 2008, Chalghoumi se retrouve sans ressources financières. Il a été chassé de la mosquée de Bobigny par les fidèles. Il a été chassé du restaurant la Pizzéria Royal par son ancien associé. Il a été chassé de l’aéroport Roissy Charles De Gaule par Fedex. Il a été chassé du business du hadj par l’Arabie Saoudite.
En 2008, Chalghoumi commence à piocher dans la caisse de la nouvelle mosquée de Drancy qui vient d’ouvrir ses portes. Dénoncé, mais protégé par le Maire de Drancy, Jean-Christophe Lagarde, qui le garde malgré les mises-en-gardes des RG et des citoyens drancéens. Alors, plusieurs responsables démissionnent, comme Nabil Maati, l’ancien directeur du projet de la mosquée de Drancy.
En 2009, Chalghoumi « se vend aux Juifs » car la mosquée de Drancy n’avait plus l’argent suffisant pour entretenir son train de vie. En 2009, Chalghoumi se converti au sionisme en plein bombardement de Gaza par les avions de Tsahal. Pendant que des centaines de milliers de Français, de gauche comme de droite, de toutes les religions y compris le judaïsme, manifestaient contre les crimes de l’armée israélienne, Chalghoumi appelle, dans Le Parisien, à interdire les manifestations pro-palestiniennes en France.
Jackpot ! Il se fait connaitre immédiatement par les médias et se fait adopter par les mouvements sionistes.
En 2010: il est la star du diner du CRIF. Il est l’avatar de Hirsi Ali. Il gagne 2 puis 3 policiers SPHP pour se protéger avec une garde prétorienne comme Ben-Ali. Pour faire taire les râleurs ou intimider ses détracteurs comme Rachid Mimouni, l’ancien trésorier cofondateur de la Conférence des Imams de France. L’argent du contribuable français pour financer le Bouclier-Anti-Crachats de Chalghoumi !
Depuis 2011: il se vend chaque jour plus pour gagner plus, pour nourrir sa grosse tête et monnayer sa soumission grossière, pour entretenir ses courtisans et ses fêtes… et payer les voyages tunisiens et les repas quotidiens de sa protection policière.
Alors, Israël ouvre son cœur à Chalghoumi au point de croire qu’il est sorti de son ventre ! Tel-Aviv déroule le tapis rouge à Chalghoumi et écrase les Palestiniens sous un tapis volant de bombes, sous l’apartheid, la colonisation et les expulsions.
Tel-Aviv refoule et horrifie des milliers de pacifistes pro-palestiniens, de toutes les nationalités et de toutes les religions… et étreint et glorifie Chalghoumi.
Tel-Aviv écrase et enterre la pacifiste américaine Rachel Corrie sous un bulldozer… et fête et installe Chalghoumi sur un piédestal.
Chalghoumi, c’est une charrue racoleuse d’un certain sionisme… Chalghoumi est une charnière pétroleuse entre l’islamophobie et le crétinisme.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
De l’imam des juifs au donneur de leçons à la France et à l’Occident.
Dixit Chalghoumi sur Radio J et sur RCJ (Radio de la Communauté Juive) : « Je suis fier qu’on m’appelle l’imam des Juifs ». « C’est un honneur pour moi quand les sites islamistes mettent le drapeau d’Israël sur ma mosquée ». Mais dans les autres médias, c’est un autre Chalghoumi qui coasse sa tristesse et qui hurle sa peur devant ceux qui l’accusent d’être l’imam des juifs. Qui demande qu’on le protège de ceux qu’il insulte. Combien a couté au contribuable français le menteur Chalghoumi à qui « on » a réquisitionné une centaine de CRS ou gendarmes pendant plusieurs mois et affecté 3 policiers SPHP quotidiennement depuis presque 3 ans.
L’antisémitisme de la serpillière que pratique Chalghoumi
Comme les antisémites classiques tels Le Pen, Chalghoumi pense que les Juifs accumulent l’argent et manipulent la politique et les médias. Mais, Chalghoumi a choisi de vendre sa religion et d’offrir un destin de bourricot pour les Veaux d’or du sionisme (CRIF, Sarkozy…) et pour les vautours de l’islamophobie (G-W Goldnadel, Sammy Ghozlan, le parrain paranoïaque de Chalghoumi et autres manipulateurs démoniaques).
Le Conseiller juif de l’imam :
C’est le titre qu’a accordé Chalghoumi à Bernard Koch en 2008. Un titre aussi stupide qu’abject, car Juif est une confession et non pas une profession. Ce Bernard Koch, [rémunéré avec l’argent de qui] a créé, début 2009, une page de soutien sur facebook aussi mensongère que dangereuse. Dixit : « L’Imam de Drancy, Hassen Chalghoumi fait l’objet d’une véritable « fatwa », un appel au meurtre, de la part d’Imams irresponsables et hostiles aux juifs et à la paix entre Israéliens et Palestiniens. » C’est faux ! Aucun imam, ni en France ni ailleurs, n’a émis de fatwas contre Chalghoumi. Extrait du courriel adressé à M Juppé, ex Ministre des Affaire Etrangères: « L’imam de Drancy souhaite vous entretenir sur différents aspects de la vie internationale (Printemps arabe, Iran, conflit israélo-palestinien…) et sur quelques sujets de politique intérieur (l’islam de France et les élections à venir, la place du vivre-ensemble…) LOL !!!
La communauté juive est innocente des bassesses de Chalghoumi
C’est seulement pour des motifs d’enrichissement crapuleux que Chalghoumi a fricassé, à certains lobbys sionistes, un islam casher. C’est seulement Chalghoumi qui doit être passé au karcher. Chalghoumi ne doit subir aucune violence. Contrairement à ce qu’il répète, les musulmans de France ne sont dangereux ni pour sa sécurité ni pour celle de la République. Il doit d’abord apprendre à parler avant de donner des leçons à 10 millions de musulmans en France ou à 1300 millions de musulmans dans le monde.
« Dégage !» est le mot d’ordre que Chalghoumi doit entendre comme l’a fait son ancien maitre Ben Ali. La communauté juive ne doit subir aucune offense. L’antisémitisme doit être combattu. Surtout à Drancy, antichambre de la Shoah. Les juifs doivent être respectés et doivent comprendre les musulmans pour qui Chalghoumi est leur filou-félon travesti en Neturei-Karta, un Drumont déguisé en rabbin, en tribun aiguisé par un français massacré à la tronçonneuse.
« Respect » est le mot d’ordre qui doit prévaloir dans les relations entre les juifs et les musulmans.
Chalghoumi : donneur de leçons aux musulmans et à l’Occident.
2/11/2011, Dixit France soir : « L’imam Hassen Chalghoumi, dont la Conférence représente 80 imams en France [faux ! Elle représente 0 imams], reproche à l’Occident d’être « naïf et trop complaisant vis-à-vis des islamistes ». « Ce qui se passe aujourd’hui dans le monde arabe est très grave. Quand le parti islamiste Ennahda accède au pouvoir en Tunisie, quand quarante pour cent des musulmans de France ont voté pour lui, je suis catastrophé. Je connais le double langage des islamistes, je suis musulman, je suis tunisien… Ces gens-là veulent instaurer la charia, et tout le monde se réjouit ».
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
France soir 21/1/2011 : Chalghoumi fait la Une avec un titre choc : L’interview qui dérange : Comment les musulmans doivent-ils se comporter en France ?
Quand Chalghoumi Fait la Une de France soir pour défendre le droit de Charlie-Hebdo de blasphémer le prophète de l’islam, il ne défend pas le droit d’expression mais son obsession d’être face aux caméras ! Même s’il parle très mal aux caméras, il fait tout et n’importe quoi pour qu’on parle de lui ! Au-moins, qu’il réponde à cette question : « pourquoi, M Chalghoumi, aviez-vous installé une caméra dans les toilettes de la mosquée de Drancy ? »
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. De la guerre contre l’islam par les musulmans. Les plaintes policières du mouchard mégalomane, du pleurnichard mythomane.
Depuis plus de 2 ans, Chalghoumi a déposé une trentaine de plaintes. Une armure de lamentations ! Excepté une fois, la justice française n’a jamais donné suite à ce Chaplet de plaintes rabâcheuses, à cette diarrhée pleurnicheuse. S’il officiait en Tunisie, il aurait pu mettre la moitié des fidèles de sa mosquée en prison. Sa première plainte, relayée par les médias, a accusé ses détracteurs d’avoir agressé les fidèles et saccagé les meubles de sa mosquée. Dans une autre plainte, il a accusé 2 jeunes musulmans, venus photographier la fameuse Porsch garée dans le jardin de son pavillon, d’être venus pour « kidnapper » ses enfants. Mais il a déserté leurs procès, malgré la dangerosité de cette accusation, malgré sa convocation par le tribunal de Bobigny à plusieurs reprises. Le mensonge et la lâcheté vont de pair chez celui qui n’hésite pas à vendre sa religion, sa famille, son honneur pour la légion d’honneur médiatique. Dans sa fameuse interview dans Le Parisien, voici les deux phrases qui résument sa vision & sa mission : « La burqa est une prison pour les femmes, un outil de domination sexiste et d’embrigadement islamiste.» & « Personnellement, mes trois filles vont à la piscine.» Sa raison d’être : s’auto-encenser e diaboliser l’ensemble de la communauté musulmane ; s’auto-glorifier et accuser les AUTRES musulmans d’être violents, intégristes, dangereux…
Les clichés néocolonialistes de certains journalistes.
Ainsi, Libération a consacré, le jour du cinquantenaire de l’indépendance de l’Algérie, le lendemain de l’équipée israélienne du nouvel ami de Lévy-Willard, un article biographique et hagiographique à ce Chalghoumi sanctifié car « menacé » et auréolé du titre « L’imam des lumières ». Sacré Gandhi ou le «Don Quichotte de l’islam », il y déclare : «j’essaie de faire un pont entre les peuples.» Rien que ça ! Un mégot essaie-t-il aussi d’illuminer la jungle ou de réduire une certaine civilisation en cendres ? Cet article ressuscite les clichés et les mensonges d’il y a 2 ans et qu’on peut résumer en 2 mots d’ordre ou en 2 titres : Marianne : « un imam en lutte contre l’islam sombre ». JSS : « 50 fanatiques du terrorisme palestinien dispersés à Drancy ».
Dans ce portrait, Chalghoumi déclare pour relativiser le fait que sa femme soit voilée : « Elle était voilée quand je l’ai rencontrée, mais ma mère, mes sœurs, ma fille de 14 ans, ne sont pas voilées. » Mensonges et mesquinerie… « Dévoiler » sa mère, mentir sur sa propre mère, abuser d’elle et des Français pour plaire, pour enjoliver son autoportrait parisien, quel culot! Puis, Chalghoumi n’a qu’une sœur. Elle est voilée. Et contrairement à lui, c’est une vraie lumière : elle est une grande chercheuse universitaire au Canada. Mais en France, quand il s’agit des musulmans, on cherche des incultes pour représenter le culte, du charbon pour représenter les Lumières, pour illuminer le mépris et allumer la haine…Ou prépare-t-on une nouvelle guerre contre le voile par des journalistes qui utilisent la femme musulmane comme champs de croisade ? Dans la même veine du rapport mensonger sur les «70 000 adolescentes victimes des mariages forcés en France » édité par le HCI, Haut Conseil à l’Intégration que présidait Blandine Kriegel, et du bidonnage de l’affaire Bintou par Le Point ? L’article de Lévy pour Libération est digne de l’idéologie des Bureaux arabes ou du journal L’Écho d’Alger avant l’indépendance de l’Algérie !
De Lahore à Tel-Aviv.
Il y a plus de 10 ans, après son arrestation par la police de Ben Ali, Chalghoumi, l’islamiste d’Ennahda a fui la Tunisie pour Damas puis Lahore. Il a passé 3 ans dans les madrasas du Pakistan. Peut-être, il a fréquenté les mêmes coins que Merah, le terroriste bien connu, lui-aussi, des RG. Comme Merah, Chalghoumi a trahi l’islam. Il y a 3 ans, Chalghoumi l’intégriste est devenu un affairiste sioniste ! Il est devenu le musulman modèle des islamophobes. Il y a plusieurs mois, Chalghoumi a été qualifié par BHL « Honneur de l’Islam » et par Finkielkraut « Prophète de la paix ». Il y a quelques semaines, Chalghoumi a été parachuté intellectuel en Israël. On l’a présenté comme le représentant des imams français. Netanyahou devrait créer un Prix Nobel de la bougnoulerie et de la traitrise. Il y a quelques jours, Chalghoumi a annoncé la création d’un Institut de formation des Imams et pourquoi ne pas créer une école par un prêtre pédophile ? Il y a une évidence : ce pitre représente le pire de la servilité et de la médiocrité. On a tenté de faire de lui un clone de Salman Rushdie ; il s’est révélé plus clown que Rantanplan ! Il y a une question qui devrait remettre les pendules à l’heure : « Chalghoumi : cheval de Troie ou chacal de trop ? »
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Islam & Chalghoumi : des hypocrisies explosives.
Dans son livre « Islam & Sarkozy : des hypocrisies explosives » (www.sarkozyislam.fr), l’ancien nègre et conseiller de Chalghoumi, Farid Hannache, qui se dit repenti et qui m’a beaucoup aidée dans cette enquête, dévoile et détaille l’arnaque Chalghoumi.
Exemples : Simulation d’agression par l’intendant de la mosquée (ancien vendeur de beignets imposé par Lagarde). Dates des meetings et diners organisés à l’intérieur de la mosquée pour honorer les conseillers de Sarkozy ou Guéant. Relation d’otage ou de supplétif avec 2 officiers des RG (STR 93). Recrutement par Le Cherche Midi pour lui faire écrire un livre contre le fascisme vert intitulé « Je suis Imam, j’aime la République et je rejette les extrémistes »…
Kadhafi-Chalghoumi ou NPNS-CIF: l’alibi islamiste.
Ni Putes Ni Soumises et la Conférence des Imams de France répètent la même rengaine : le danger des islamistes. C’est le même refrain qu’a répété le tyran sanguinaire Kadhafi pour justifier sa dictature et sa sauvagerie, pour pousser l’Occident, y compris la France, à fermer les yeux et à le soutenir financièrement et militairement. Il a fallu que le peuple libyen se révolte pour que la France se range derrière le peuple arabe. Faut-il que les Arabes et les musulmans de France se révoltent pour que la France cesse de soutenir politiquement, financièrement et militairement (via les policiers SPHP bien armés et mal affectés) les escrocs de l’islam de France et les ennemis de la communauté musulmane comme Chalghoumi ?
L’instrumentalisation politicienne de certains faits-divers ou de certains drames ou causes débouche sur une stigmatisation systématique de l’islam et accouche d’associations ou de personnalités comiques qui manipulent des sujets tragiques. Ni Putes Ni soumises a fait son beurre avec les tournantes. La vocation de cette association, à part celui de rafler des subventions, est de réduire les musulmans à l’oppression des femmes et réduire l’oppression des femmes aux cités. Mais, de Ayan Hirchi Ali à Fadéla Amara, la stigmatisation des musulmans rapporte une célébrité médiatique, des gains financiers et des postes politiques, députées ou ministres.
Chalghoumi a fait son beurre avec la Shoah puis la burqa. En 4 ans, il est passé du statut « intégriste sous mandat d’expulsion » au statut « victime des islamistes ». Plus malin que la Dame mythomane du RER D, Chalghoumi a bien digéré la devise de Fadéla Amara : « pour faire la Une de la presse, pour être une maîtresse de la désinformation politique et des honneurs médiatiques, il suffit de devenir une traitresse de l’islam et une prêtresse des croisades journalistiques». Il suffit d’accuser des musulmans de violence et d’obscurantisme ! En 2009, après avoir appelé à interdire les manifestations pro-palestiniennes pendant les bombardements de Gaza, il a prétendu que sa maison a été saccagée et sa voiture brulée. Faux ! En 2010, après avoir soutenu la loi pour interdire le voile intégral, il s’est inventé une agression contre sa personne à l’intérieur de sa mosquée. Faux ! Il n’y était même pas. Il était à la mairie du riche 16ème arrondissement une réception de l’UPJF (Union des Patrons Juifs de France avec Claude Goasguen, Président du groupe d’amitié France-Israël à l’Assemblée Nationale.
Plusieurs médias ont démontré les mensonges de Chalghoumi, comme ces deux articles sur le site internet de TF1 : « Drancy : l’imam anti-burqa s’est-il vraiment fait agresser ? » et « Agression de l’imam anti-burqa : la vidéo qui sème le doute ». Mais, l’article de Caroline Fourest « L’imam sacrifié » l’a blanchi et l’a sanctifié. L’honnêteté des journalistes ne font pas le poids devant la mauvaise foi de la Fourest, la serial-menteuse du maccarthysme islamophobe. L’escroquerie Chalghoumi va finir, probablement, en cendres, mais le four reste. Cette machine de désinformation et de gesticulation qui veut chauffer l’opinion publique contre l’islam et brûler le vivre-ensemble.
Marche contre l’islam radical avec les racistes néofascistes de Riposte laïque :
Encensé par les plumes islamophobes de la Sarkozy, Rioufol, Del Val et le Philippe Val, cette caricature des doubles-discours; encensé par la LDG, Ligue de Défense Juive, ce groupuscule fascisioniste interdit en Israël et aux Etats-Unis et autorisé en France (compromission insensée ); Chalghoumi, dans le cadre de son travail pour la campagne de Sarkozy devait organiser une Marche contre l’islam radical. C’est-à-dire une marche contre une partie du Coran et de la Souna jugée, par les nouveaux dieux de Chalghoumi, radicale ou extrémiste! Cette marche devait avoir lieu la veille du 1er tour des présidentielles, reportée à la veille du 2ème tour, elle sera un minuscule et ridicule rassemblement sur les marches de la Bastille : une cinquantaine de personnes, dont la moitié était des élus de l’UMP ou des représentants de la communauté juive. Ce qui preuve que Chalghoumi, qui y porta le drapeau tricolore comme une étoile jaune, ne représente rien.
Pire, cette manifestation prouve que Chalghoumi représente le néant ! Puisqu’il voulait organiser cette marche contre l’islam « radical » avec les racistes de Riposte Laïquedont le site internet a loué et glorifié Chalghoumi, avant que la LICRA n’interdise leur participation. Chalghoumi a ainsi travaillé et fait rentrer dans la mosquée de Drancy les néofascistes de Riposte Laïque qui veulent interdire le coran en France et qui qualifient le Prophète Mohammed de pédophile criminel de guerre !
Haine, est-elle le business de Chalghoumi ?
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Le changement, c’est maintenant !
« Le mépris, c’est la religion de certains politiques envers les musulmans et les citoyens issus de la diversité… Une partie de la classe politique française rêve toujours de cet islam archéologique, celui des caïds, des bachaghas et des marabouts, et surtout celui des béni oui-oui… La relation entre la République et les leaders musulmans ne doit pas être une relation entre le guichet et les chaouchs. Certains politiques français veulent que les musulmans restent visibles par dérogation et audibles par procuration. Les représentants musulmans ne doivent plus rester des figurants sans voix ou des figurines de plomb… Crème et beurs ne sont pas antinomiques. Il y a parmi les Français de confession ou d’origine musulmane, des cadres supérieurs, des hauts fonctionnaires, de grands patrons, de grands professeurs dans les hôpitaux ou les universités, des créateurs de richesses, des vecteurs de sagesse, des ingénieurs, des médecins, des avocats, des personnes méritantes qui aiment la France et qui respectent l’islam et la laïcité.
L’islam fait partie de la Nation française, riche de sa diversité et forte de ses valeurs. L’islam est une religion minoritaire, mais les Français de confession ou de filiation musulmane ne sont pas des citoyens partiels… des citoyens à part entière et non pas des citoyens à part. »
Les critères néocolonialistes pour introniser & médiatiser un représentant musulman :
Parler comme un bouffon et agir comme un paillasson… Parler comme une casserole et trainer plusieurs casseroles (escroquerie, extrémisme…) Pour aboyer comme un mercenaire et être tenu en laisse par la menace de poursuites judiciaires…
La mission (ou la raison d’être) de Chalghoumi :
Stigmatiser l’islam et les musulmans. Attiser la haine et le racisme contre les Arabes et les banlieues en France. Attiser la haine et la guerre contre les Frères Musulmans, surtout en Tunisie et en Égypte.
Chers Français de toutes les religions… Chers Musulmans de toutes les nationalités : Si vous voulez vous enrichir avec l’argent de certains lobbys sionistes, crachez sur le peuple palestinien, dites que les résistants palestiniens sont des terroristes, dites que les Juifs sont menacés en France… Si vous voulez avoir une protection policière, crachez sur l’islam, dites que les imams de France sont des intégristes, dites que les Banlieues sont des Bases-arrières à certains Beurs terroristes …
Si vous voulez que Chalghoumi arrête de salir l’islam et d’insulter les musulmans : Demandez une enquête policière sur les relations entre Chalghoumi et la police politique de Ben Ali. Demandez une enquête judiciaire sur les comptes bancaires et l’argent en noir de Chalghoumi et de « SArl » mosquée. Faites des élections libres et démocratiques pour remplacer le faux imam Chalghoumi par un vrai imam, un vrai homme de foi, un vrai Homme, à la tête de l’association qui dirige la mosquée de Drancy.
P.S. … Post Scriptum
Manuel Valls, le successeur de Guéant grâce au succès de Hollande, va-t-il prescrire et réussir le changement à Beauvau ou maintenir la même relation de Guéant avec Chalghoumi et les musulmans de France ? Va-t-il enterrer ou entretenir la gestion néocolonialiste et pyromane de Hortefeux ? Va-t-il libérer l’islam de France de l’ingérence policière et des héritiers de Papon ? Va-t-il être l’héritier de Joxe-Chevènement-Vaillant ou l’héritier de Sarkozy-Hortefeux-Guéant ? Va-t-il suivre Fourest, comme Sarkozy a suivi Buisson, pour poursuivre l’islamophobie par d’autres moyens et d’autres « styles » ?
Qui réussira à soigner le Ministère de l’Intérieur du sarkozysme et du paponisme ?
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Pendant la campagne électorale des présidentielles de 2012 Chalghoumi au Premier rang du meeting de Sarkozy à Villepinte Avec les ministres de Sarkozy et les stars de l’UMP. Excepté la période du pétainisme, Connaissez-vous un prêtre, un pasteur, un rabbin, un imam Qui s’est mouillé pour une élection politique comme Chalghoumi ? Chalghoumi est une violation de la laïcité et une perversion politicienne !
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Pendant la campagne électorale des législatives de 2012 Avec le Seigneur de Drancy et sa fameuse veste jaune Et l’ex-vendeur de beignets que Lagarde a imposé à la mosquée Un couscous et des gâteaux, des cadeaux pour les enfants et l’odeur des HLM Pour récolter des voix… Pour alimenter l’électoralisme Pour nourrir le communautarisme… Pour pourrir la laïcité. Drancy : modèles des hypocrisies françaises!
Exemple d’un carton d’invitation adressé aux commerçants musulmans de Drancy Pour un diner copieux copiant les méthodes électoralistes les plus populistes Pour récolter des soutiens pour le tandem Lagarde-Chalghoumi L’argent de la mairie de Drancy + l’argent de la mosquée de Drancy = Violation de la laïcité et institutionnalisation du communautarisme
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Comme pour les lieutenants de Sarkozy et pour son seigneur Lagarde Chalghoumi a organisé un copieux diner électoraliste pour El-Bastawissi Ex notable de l’ex-dictateur Moubarak et Ex-candidat aux présidentielles…. En Egypte ! En expulsant les musulmanes de leur salle de prière reconvertit en salle de réception En utilisant le livre Pour l’islam de France, qu’il n’a ni écrit ni lu, comme faire-valoir. L’enfant illégitime de Ben Ali et Sarkozy est en guerre lucrative contre Frères Musulmans
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Les jumeaux-valets de Ben Ali : L’intellectuel et l’illettré, le diplomate et le bouffon ! Avec Mezri Haddad, l’ancien ambassadeur de Ben Ali à l’UNESCO : Hordes fanatisées, voleurs, pilleurs, voyous, bandes d’islamistes, terroristes C’est ce qu’il a dit pour qualifier les manifestants tunisiens qui ont déclenché le Printemps arabe Et qui ont fait chuter le dictateur Ben Ali, son maitre et celui de Chalghoumi. Qui se ressemblent s’assemblent !
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Entre Christine Boutin, l’ancienne ministre sarkozyste du Logement, Et Richard Prasquier, l’influent Président du trop puissant CRIF : Chalghoumi savoure son escroquerie la Conférence des Imams de France, Et trinque pour la menterie et pour la filouterie. Une farce pour se farcir de vanité et de subventions !
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Entre le Mémorial de la Shoah (derrière) et les caméras (devant) Entre Cheikh Noureddine, le vrai imam de Drancy, (à droite) et Sammy Ghozlan, son vrai mufti médiatique ,( à gauche), Chalghoumi massacre le français, la vérité et la dignité, en instrumentalisant les victimes massacrées par le nazisme ou le terrorisme.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Les intellectuels faussaires et le guignol émissaire Avant de participer au Forum “ démocratie et religion ” à Tel-Aviv début juin 2012Avec Frédéric Encel, Alain Finkielkraut, Elisabeth Lévy, Caroline Fourest, et autres islamophobes Le faux-imam de Drancy a été reçu, béni et adoubé par le Grand Rabbin d’Israël. Puis, il a déroulé son charabia islamophobe et son refrain des béni-oui-ouiUn sketch contre les Frères Musulmans, du HAMAS à Ennahda, de l’Egypte au Qatar. Un farce sur des affiches « Juif dégage » collées à Drancy et qui ont excité le Finkielkraut.On veut faire de lui un clone de Salman Rushdie, mais il ne peut être que plus clown que Rantanplan.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Malgré son intronisation par le CRIF et sa bénédiction par plusieurs puissants courtisans juifs, Malgré son à-plat-ventrisme léchant devant les proches de Sarkozy (entrisme rampant) Chalghoumi a toujours été méprisé, même instrumentalisé, par les caciques de la Droite L’ex Premier Ministre Fillon a toujours refusé de le recevoir et même de lui jeter un regard. De toute la langue française que Chalghoumi ne cesse de massacrer ou de maltraiter, La dignité est le mot qu’il ne pourra jamais comprendre , concevoir ou interpréter.
« Chalghoumi met en garde l’Occident » Un pantin inculte pour faire la guerre médiatique au Printemps arabe. Une marionnette illettrée pour agiter la haine contre les arabes et les musulmans. Désinformation et racisme, manipulation et bellicisme. Les enfants de Pétain ont besoin des enfants de Goebbels !
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Extraits d’un article goebbelsien paru dans le Jerusalem Post début aout 2012 sous le titre de « Prêcher l’exemple »
« Hassen Chalghoumi, l’imam solitaire, le prêcheur de Drancy. […]Chaque vendredi, son prêche attire quelque 4 000 Musulmans » Faux ! le Chalghoumi ne prêche pas et il n’a jamais prêché.
« Fermez ces sites, pour l’amour du Ciel ! […] Les fils de Ouma.com, qu’il rebaptise “Haine.com” »
« L’imam en colère pointe du doigt cinq ou six sites fanatiques, connus de tous, financés par les Frères musulmans ou d’autres mouvances salafistes. Des vecteurs d’intégrisme dont Merah serait le produit direct pour s’y être gavé de vidéos, affirme-t-il. “Pourquoi, pour l’amour du Ciel, le gouvernement ne ferme-t-il pas une fois pour toutes ces plates-formes web ? Par manque de courage politique ?”. La France doit balayer devant sa porte, insiste-t-il. “Il faut arrêter de chercher les coupables en Afghanistan, ils sont chez nous, dans nos prisons”. Les cellules constituent les terres de chasse des Frères musulmans, estime Chalghoumi. Et là encore, il en appelle au gouvernement : “Nous devons protéger notre avenir pour que la France reste la France de Voltaire”. Sa solution : créer un islam de France. Former des imams français. »
Le faux-imam Chalghoumi accuse la France de lâcheté et lui demande d’être plus islamophobe, demande au nouveau gouvernement français de reprendre la croisade de ses anciens patrons Sarkozy-Ben Ali !
« […]constate un malaise dans sa banlieue. Un blocage identitaire et social qui fait le lit, selon lui, des recruteurs d’Al-Qaïda. […] Surtout, des Frères musulmans, ramifiés, infiltrés, omniprésents dans la capitale et ses zones satellites, mais aussi en province. Et de partir en croisade contre ceux qui se revendiquent de l’islam, “mais ont vendu leur âme à la haine, à l’antisémitisme”. Il faut prendre exemple sur la communauté juive, revendique Chalghoumi. Selon lui, “la communauté musulmane est à la traîne”. Des propos chocs, encensés par les uns, conspués par les siens. Peu importe, l’imam se bat pour ses idées : ôter toute stigmatisation sur les Juifs de la part des jeunes Arabes de banlieue qui exportent le conflit moyen-oriental, une fois encore, en toute méconnaissance du sujet. » Stigmatisation haineuse des jeunes de banlieue et des Frères Musulmans et glorification vicieuse des « juifs »
« L’ennemi numéro 1 : Aux Israéliens venus le saluer et le remercier de ses prises de position courageuses, il répondait, la main sur le coeur, “souhaitez-moi bonne chance pour le retour”. […] Aujourd’hui, cet imam de 40 ans est régulièrement la cible des intégristes français dont il est devenu l’ennemi numéro 1. Sa vie est périodiquement menacée.»
Armure de lamentation… Auto-victimisation et stigmatisation des autres musulmans.
« Pour distiller son message de paix, d’amour et de tolérance, et contrer les déviances de l’islam. “Il faut avoir le courage de dire la vérité”, ponctue l’imam, “peut-être que le courage a manqué en France, en 1940, pour dénoncer ce qui était en train de se passer. Aujourd’hui, je suis prêt à parler envers et contre tout, pour que de telles horreurs, comme la Shoah ou la tragédie de Toulouse ne se reproduisent pas”. »
Chalghoumi se déclare plus courageux que la France toute entière en 1940 !!!
Chalghoumi devrait être un objet d’étude anthropologique pour les élèves de Germaine Tillion, cette courageuse résistante rescapée du camp de Ravensbrück, cette grande anthropologue qui a écrit le Harem des cousins, qui a dénoncé la « clochardisation » et la fabrication des caïds comme politique coloniale.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Après la réquisition de la mosquée de Drancy pour Sarkozy, ses conseillers, ses préfets et ses policiers Après la « collaboration » avec les néofascistes de Riposte Laïque pour la Marche contre l’islam radical Chalghoumi roule maintenant pour Caroline Fourest qui le bombarde partout, de Tel-Avi à France-Inter La pire des islamophobes s’est alliée avec le pitre des musulmans Le tribun de l’antisarkosysme primaire et le larbin primitif de Sarkozy pour continuer cette croisade médiatique contre l’islam et contre le monde arabe Après le virus BHL, Bobards partout, Haine des autres, Louanges à soi La diarrhée pseudo-intellectuelle pseudo-religieuse : Bassesses, Horreurs et leurres.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Soirée communautaire à Drancy : A la gauche de Chalghoumi, le commissaire de police de Drancy. A la droite de Chalghoumi, l’ancien policier algérien reconverti dans le sarkozysme Plus à droite de Chalghoumi, le Préfet ultra-sarkozyste du 93, ancien patron du RAID Derrière Chalghoumi, l’officier des RG affecté à (et qui a infecté) la mosquée de Drancy. Ben Ali, c’était la dictature protégée par la police. Chalghoumi, c’est l’islamophobie protégée par la police!
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Campagne électorale des présidentielles de 2012. Drancy le 10 avril 2012: Déplacement politique et déclassement de la République. En face de Sarkozy et son ami Lagarde, il y a leur imam Chalghoumi. A la gauche de Sarkozy, entre Patrick Karam, son Monsieur communautarisme, Et entre Olivier Biancarelli, directeur du pôle politique de l’Elysée et organisateur ou invité de plusieurs diners électoralistes-islamiques, Il y a un ancien policier algérien reconverti dans le sarkozsyme. D’Alger à Paris, les voix de la police politique sont impénétrables !
Note : 4.6/5 (9 votes)
GHYSLAINE ROC, LA VIERGE ROUGE RÉINCARNÉE ET LA RÉVOLUTION ISLAMIQUE !
Dear Readers:The conflict that Washington has initiated between the West and Russia/China is reckless and irresponsible. Nuclear war could be the outcome. Indeed, Washington has been preparing for nuclear war since the George W. Bush regime.
Washington has revised US war doctrine in order to initiate conflict with a first strike nuclear attack.
Washington has discarded the ABM treaty in order to build and deploy anti-ballistic missiles that are intended to prevent a retaliatory strike against the US. Washington is engaged in a buildup of military forces on Russia’s borders, and Washington is demonizing Russia’s government with false charges.
As the Bush/Obama regimes dismantled the safeguards put in place in order to minimize the risk of nuclear war, no protests came from the American public or the media. Washington’s European vassal states have also been silent.
Washington’s drive for hegemony has brought nuclear insanity to the world.
Moscow and Beijing understand that they are Washington’s targets. As Larchmonter explains, Russia and China are conjoining their economic and military capabilities in order to protect against Washington’s attack. Read what Larchmonter reports. Open the URL in my column below and run your cursor over the bottom of the page and click “page fit.” Choose 50% and readable text will fill your screen.
Washington’s demonization of Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi, and Assad were preludes to military attacks on Iraq, Libya, and Syria. In view of these precedents, it is reasonable to regard Washington’s demonization of Vladimir Putin as a prelude to military action.
Russia is not Iraq, Libya, or Syria. Russian war doctrine states that Russia can use nuclear weapons in response to a nuclear or conventional attack on Russia. For the world to sit silent while Washington’s arrogance provokes Armageddon telegraphs total political failure. Where are the voices on behalf of humanity?
RESENT BECAUSE OF ITS UTMOST IMPORTANCE!!! From Muhammad Al-Massari
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 20:00 To: almassari Subject: FW: Outlook for the New Year — Paul Craig Roberts Importance: High DANGEROUS NEO NAZI LIAR BORIS NEMTSOV
Зашла ли в тупик война Путина с Украиной Борис Немцов
Washington has shaped 2015 to be a year of conflict. The conflict could be intense.
Washington is the cause of the conflict, which has been brewing for some time. Russia was too weak to do anything about it when the Clinton regime pushed NATO to Russia’s borders and illegally attacked Yugoslavia, breaking the country into small easily controlled pieces. Russia was also too weak to do anything about it when the George W. Bush regime withdrew from the ABM treaty and undertook to locate anti-ballistic missile bases on Russia’s borders. Washington lied to Moscow that the purpose of the ABM bases is to protect Europe from non-existent Iranian nuclear ICBMs. However, Moscow understood that the purpose of the ABM bases is to degrade Russia’s nuclear deterrent, thereby enhancing Washington’s ability to coerce Russia into agreements that compromise Russian sovereignty.
By summer 2008 Russian power had returned. On Washington’s orders, the US and Israeli trained and equipped Georgian army attacked the breakaway republic of South Ossetia during the early hours of August 8, killing Russian peacekeepers and civilian population. Units of the Russian military instantly responded and within a few hours the American trained and equipped Georgian army was routed and defeated. Georgia was in Russia’s hands again, where the province had resided during the 19th and 20th centuries.
Putin should have hung Mikheil Saakashvili, the American puppet installed as president of Georgia by the Washington-instigated “Rose Revolution”, and reincorporated Georgia into the Russian Federation.
Instead, in a strategic error, Russia withdrew its forces, leaving Washington’s puppet regime in place to cause future trouble for Russia. Washington is pushing hard to incorporate Georgia into NATO, thus adding more US military bases on Russia’s border. However, at the time, Moscow thought Europe to be more independent of Washington than it is and relied on good relations with Europe to keep American bases out of Georgia.
Today the Russian government no longer has any illusion that Europe is capable of an independent foreign policy. Russian President Vladimir Putin has stated publicly that Russia has learned that diplomacy with Europe is pointless, because European politicians represent Washington’s interest, not Europe’s. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov recently acknowledged that Europe’s Captive Nation status has made it clear to Russia that Russian goodwill gestures are unable to produce diplomatic results.
With Moscow’s delusion shattered that diplomacy with the West can produce peaceful solutions, reality has set in, reinforced by the demonization of Vladimir Putin by Washington and its vassal states. Hillary Clinton called Putin the new Hitler. While Washington incorporates former constituent parts of the Russian and Soviet empires into its own empire and bombs seven countries, Washington claims that Putin is militarily aggressive and intends to reconstitute the Soviet empire. Washington arms the neo-nazi regime Obama established in Ukraine, while erroneously claiming that Putin has invaded and annexed Ukrainian provinces. All of these blatant lies are echoed repeatedly by the Western presstitutes. Not even Hitler had such a compliant media as Washington has.
Every diplomatic effort by Russia has been blocked by Washington and has come to naught. So now Russia has been forced by reality to update its military doctrine. The new doctrine approved on December 26 states that the US and NATO comprise a major military threat to the existence of Russia as a sovereign independent country.
The Russian document cites Washington’s war doctrine of pre-emptive nuclear attack, deployment of anti-ballistic missiles, buildup of NATO forces, and intent to deploy weapons in space as clear indications that Washington is preparing to attack Russia.
Washington is also conducting economic and political warfare against Russia, attempting to destabilize the economy with economic sanctions and attacks on the ruble. The Russian document acknowledges that Russia faces Western threats of regime change achieved through “actions aimed at violent change of the Russian constitutional order, destabilization of the political and social environment, and disorganization of the functioning of governmental bodies, crucial civilian and military facilities and informational infrastructure of Russia.” Foreign financed NGOs and foreign owned Russian media are tools in Washington’s hands for destabilizing Russia.
Washington’s reckless aggressive policy against Russia has resurrected the nuclear arms race. Russia is developing two new ICBM systems and in 2016 will deploy a weapons system designed to negate the US anti-ballistic missile system. In short, the evil warmongers that rule in Washington have set the world on the path to nuclear Armageddon.
The Russian and Chinese governments both understand that their existence is threatened by Washington’s hegemonic ambitions. Larchmonter reports that in order to defeat Washington’s plans to marginalize both countries, the Russian and Chinese governments have decided to unify their economies into one and to conjoin their military commands. Henceforth, Russia and China move together on the economic and military fronts. http://www.mediafire.com/view/08rzue8ffism94t/China- Russia_Double_Helix.docx
The unity of the Bear and the Dragon reduces the crazed neoconservatives’ dream of “an American century” to dangerous nonsense. As Larchmonter puts it, “The US and NATO would need Michael the Archangel to defeat China-Russia, and from all signs Michael the Archangel is aligned with the Bear and its Orthodox culture. There is no weapon, no strategy, no tactic conceivable in the near future to damage either of these rising economies now that they are ‘base pairs.’”
Larchmonter sees hope in the new geopolitics created by the conjoining of Russia and China. I don’t dispute this, but if the arrogant neoconservatives realize that their hegemonic policy has created a foe over which Washington cannot prevail, they will push for a pre-emptive nuclear strike before the Russian-Chinese unified command is fully operational. To forestall a sneak attack, Russia and China should operate on full nuclear alert.
The US economy–indeed the entire Western orientated economy from Japan to Europe–is a house of cards. Since the economic downturn began seven years ago, the entirety of Western economic policy has been diverted to the support of a few over-sized banks, sovereign debt, and the US dollar. Consequently, the economies themselves and the ability of populations to cope have deteriorated.
The financial markets are based on manipulation, not on fundamentals. The manipulation is untenable. With debt exploding, negative real interest rates make no sense. With real consumer incomes, real consumer credit, and real retail sales stagnant or falling, the stock market is a bubble. With Russia, China, and other countries moving away from the use of the dollar to settle international accounts, with Russia developing an alternative to the SWIFT financial network, the BRICS developing alternatives to the IMF and World Bank, and with other parts of the world developing their own credit card and Internet systems, the US dollar, along with the Japanese and European currencies that are being printed in order to support the dollar’s exchange value, could experience a dramatic drop in exchange value, which would make the import-dependent Western world dysfunctional.
In my opinion, it took the Russians and Chinese too long to comprehend the evil that has control in Washington. Therefore, both countries risk nuclear attack prior to the full operational capability of their conjoined defense. As the Western economy is a house of cards, Russia and China could collapse the Western economy before the neoconservatives can drive the world to war. As Washington’s aggression against both countries is crystal clear, Russia and China have every right to the following defensive measures.
As the US and EU are conducting economic warfare against Russia, Russia could claim that by wrecking the Russian economy the West has deprived Russia of the ability to repay loans to the European banks. If this does not bring down the thinly capitalized EU banks, Russia can announce that as NATO countries are now officially recognized by Russian war doctrine as an enemy of the Russian state, Russia can no longer support NATO’s aggression against Russia by selling natural gas to NATO members. If the shutdown of much of European industry, rapidly rising rates of unemployment, and bank failures do not result in the dissolution of NATO and thus the end of the threat, the Chinese can act.
The Chinese hold a very large amount of dollar-denominated financial assets. Just as the Federal Reserve’s agents, the bullion banks, dump massive shorts onto the bullion futures markets during periods of little activity in order to drive down the bullion price, China can dump the equivalent in US Treasuries of years of Quantitative Easing in a few minutes. If the Federal Reserve quickly creates dollars with which to purchase the enormous quantity of Treasuries so that the financial house of cards does not implode, the Chinese can then dump the dollars that they are paid for the bonds in the currency market. Whereas the Federal Reserve can print dollars with which to purchase the Treasuries, the Fed cannot print foreign currencies with which to buy the dollars.
The dollar would collapse, and with it the power of the Hegemon. The war would be over without a shot or missile fired.
In my view, Russia and China owe it to the world to prevent the nuclear war intended by the neoconservatives simply by replying in kind to Washington’s economic warfare. Russia and China hold all the cards. Not Washington.
Russia and China should give no warning. They should just act. Indeed, instead of step by step, Russia and China could simultaneously use the counter-measures. With four US banks holding derivatives totaling many times world GDP, the financial explosion would be the equivalent to a nuclear one. The US and Europe would be finished, and the world would be saved.
Larchmonter possibly is correct. 2015 could be a very good year, but pre-emptive economic moves by Moscow and Beijing could be required. Putin’s current plan seems to be to turn away from the West, ignore the provocations, and mesh Russia’s strategic and economic interests with those of Asia. This is a humane and reasonable course of action, but it leaves the West untroubled and undistracted by its economic vulnerabilities. An untroubled West remains a grave danger not only to Russia and China but also to Americans and the entire world.
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts' latest books areThe Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West and How America Was Lost.
Vite avant la censure! Dans cette vidéo explosive, Vincent Reynouard analyse le discours tenu le 23 février dernier par Monsieur Hollande lors du dîner du Crif (Conseil représentatif des institutions juives de France). On y trouve des perles et des aveux mémorables, qu'il fallait souligner, du genre : "Tous les ennemis des juifs sont les ennemis de la liberté"; "Ne pas enseigner la Shoah, c'est déjà la nier", etc. Vincent Reynouard les analyse une par une et démontre leurs implications pratiques.
Dans cet édito, Vincent Reynouard annonce la censure en un temps record de sa dernière vidéo: moins de 7 heures...
Il explique ensuite la dérive totalitaire que vit notre société depuis 40 ans. Aujourd'hui, la philosophie première de la loi de 1881 sur la liberté de la presse a totalement disparue; elle a été remplacée par une philosophie contraire qui rend cette loi liberticide.
Vincent Reynouard le démontre, documents à l'appui.
Un Citoyen de la République bananière de France vous demande de déporter toute la clique de Bernard-Henri Lévi, Crif, Licra et S.O.S. Racisme inclus, et de les envoyer toutes et tous à Guantanamo!(Voir lettre ouverte du Dr Kevin Barrett à Obama)
Votre cheval de bataille sioniste "apologie du racisme, de l'antisémitisme, du négationnisme et du terrorisme" le fait vomir, et toutes et tous que vous accusez lâchement de racisme, d'antisémitisme, de négationnisme et de terrorisme sans jamais nous donner de droit de réponse libre et de nous défendre car les lois ne protègent plus le Citoyen, mais exclusivement l'oligarchie judaïque, laïciste,et la Tribu de Sionistes, de Shoahistes, et de pornographes.
Interview de Vincent Reynouard condamné à 2 ans ferme
Interview de Vincent Reynouard juste après son procès de février 2015 ou il était entendu pour contestation de crime contre l'humanité, a finalement été condamné à deux ans de réclusion. Peine qui sera rediscuté en appel, puisque le procureur de la République a jugé que cette dernière était "trop lourde" et disproportionnée.
Comme les médias (presse, télévision, cinéma, etc.) sont tous, sans exception, contrôlés oupossédés (murs ou fonds de commerce) par les Suprématistes judaïstes et laïcistes , nous n'avons jamais eu droit à la parole dans le pays, et, maintenant, vous menacez de vous attaquer au monde numérique, le seul moyen qui nous reste de faire entendre notre voix,alors que la pornographie y est permise.Je vomis cette France qui vous a mis au pouvoir dans l'unique but de tapiner pour ce Lobby satanique, raciste, pédophile, franc-maçonnique, terroriste, faussement sémite, talmudiste et pharisaïque, qui jadis fit crucifier leur propre Messie en Palestine occupée par les impérialistes romains envahisseurs, meurtriers de masse, pillards, colonisateurs, racistes et véritables antisémites.
Il y a plus de cent ans que la France est l'otage du Lobby judaïste, marxiste et sioniste, depuis au moins la fausse affaire Dreyfus.D'un État esclavagiste, la France est passée à un État prostitué au Barons des finances et de l'immoralité.Les Barons de la drogue, les réseaux de prostitution, de pédophilie, et d'homosexuels sont protégés par l'État, le plus grand proxénète du pays! Alors, Monsieur le Crifiste, l'UEJFiste, le Licraïste, l'Homophile, le grand défenseur d'Israël, ne nous insultez pas en disant que vous avez "éliminé la circulation des images pédopornographiques sur les réseaux" alors que vos sex-shops de la Capitale n'ont jamais cessé, à ma connaissance, de vendre non seulement ces mêmes images, mais aussi des vidéos, en toute liberté, y compris sur l'Internet.
N'est-ce pas vous et vos terroristes qui ont détruit ou aidé à détruire des pays arabes et musulmans souverains, la Palestine, le Soudan, la Lybie, l'Irak, l'Afghanistan, et bien d'autres?Les vrais terroristes et racistes sont parmi vos amis et acolytes!Vous dites la France est laïque, et en même temps vous pratiquez et défendez les dogmes racistes et fascistes de la "Shoah", de "l'Anti-sémitisme", et du "Négationnisme"!De quel droit nous empêchez-vous de réviser l'histoire?De quel droit permettez-vous (ainsi que d'autres) d'utiliser une plateforme raciste et terroriste (Crif) pour adresser la nation française et proférer des menaces contre les Citoyennes et Citoyens paisibles de la République?
Si vous n'avez pas suffisamment de drones prédateurs pour toute la Tribu, déportez-les toutes et tous ou faites appel à votre Légion Terroriste Étrangère qui terrorise et massacre des innocents à l'étranger, y compris en Algérie qu'elle occupe à ce jour avec la junte judéo-laïque militaire!Selon vous et vos semblables, il parait que la France est surpeuplée de racistes, d'antisémites, de négationnistes, d'homophobes et de Nazis qui vous empêchent de dormir et provoquent des cauchemars au Peuple Choisi!
Google, Apple, Facebook, Twitter sous contrôle français en avril 2015?Qu'ils aillent tous au diable, vos larbins du Crif, les Bernard Caseneuve, les Manuel Valls, et, vous, y compris!La France demeurant toujours impunie des crimes contre l'humanité et de l'esclavagisme, alors qu'elle se la ferme!Remplacer la Palestine par Israël?Remplacer la Lybie par BHL?Remplacer Dieu par la Shoah?Remplacer l'Iran par Israël?Et, puis, quoi encore?Quelle France nauséabonde!
D'une clarté incroyable et d'une justesse prophétique ! « La théorie du genre : la dissociation du sexe et du genre / Des professeurs piégés par le lobby gay / La laïcité : une nouvelle religion pour abattre toutes les autres religions / L'école pour abattre le catholicisme / Les enfants qui appartiendraient à l'état plutôt qu'aux parents. » VISITEZ : http://www.unfeusurlaterre.org ; site de l'organisme Qéhélata (Québec)
La justice française a interdit mercredi la commercialisation du DVD du spectacle Le Mur du polémiste Dieudonné, déjà interdit de représentation dans plusieurs villes de France début 2014, a-t-on appris auprès de l’avocat de la LICRA.
La Ligue internationale contre le racisme et l’antisémitisme, à l’origine de cette demande, s’est vu accorder 5 000 euros de dommages et intérêts, a précisé Me David-Olivier Kaminski.
« La justice consacre l’interdiction judiciaire du spectacle Le Mur après l’interdiction administrative ordonnée par le Conseil d’État », a-t-il dit à Reuters. « L’interdiction de la propagation de la haine antisémite est fermement rappelée par l’institution judiciaire. »
L’avocat de Dieudonné n’était pas joignable dans l’immédiat.
Le point de vue du capitaine Paul Barril, du GIGN, sur l’attentat de la rue des Rosiers perpétré le 9 août 1982.
« Qui sont les auteurs de la boucherie sanglante de la rue des Rosiers ? Le terroriste Abou Nidal revendique souvent, et sans aucun complexe, les forfaits qu’il commet. En revanche, il ne s’exprimera jamais sur le “sujet tabou” de l’attentat de la rue des Rosiers. Plus de treize ans après les faits, c’est le silence dans la “communauté du renseignement”, où pourtant peu de secrets peuvent résister au temps, à la délation et aux vantardises, voire à la trahison ou aux primes en dollars. Les attentats arabes commis dans les années 80 ont été, un à un, élucidés, leurs auteurs connus, ainsi que leurs commanditaires. Tous, sauf pour la rue des Rosiers. Black-out total. Cet attentat reste “hors normes”. Un de ses premiers effets aura été de renverser, en faveur de l’État d’Israël et contre le “terrorisme palestinien”, le climat violemment anti-israélien créé par les atrocités commises au Liban par Tsahal, l’armée israélienne. Un basculement du discours télévisuel et médiatique suivit. L’“agresseur israélien” devint la “victime juive”. Un miracle en somme. J’en serai moi-même surpris, à l’occasion d’une rencontre au sein de l’ambassade israélienne à Paris, avec un vieux monsieur chauve, digne et discret : le représentant du Mossad pour l’Europe. Les Israéliens, qui n’ont jamais manifesté, dans le cas de l’attentat de la rue des Rosiers, leur habituelle volonté d’appliquer la “loi du Talion”, semblaient peu intéressés par mes informations. J’en ai gardé un profond sentiment de malaise et de gêne. Régis Debray, dans une note confidentielle qu’il adressa au président de la République, en date du 20 avril 1984, confirma mes interrogations sur cet étrange attentat de la rue des Rosiers, ainsi que la dangerosité des Irlandais de Vincennes. Il faisait apparaître le rôle particulièrement trouble de Bernard Jégat. En effet, écrivait-il à François Mitterrand :
“Il a la conviction intime [Bernard Jégat], ainsi qu’un faisceau de présomptions, que ses amis irlandais ont servi de base logistique (voitures, passeports, contacts, armes) dans l’attentat de la rue des Rosiers, mais il n’en a pas la preuve matérielle, là est la difficulté. Bernard Jégat se sent aujourd’hui menacé de mort par ses anciens amis. Il demande les moyens de déménager rapidement, un permis de port d’arme et une orientation sur la conduite à tenir (doit-il aller ou non chez le juge d’instruction ?). Il me remettra, dans une quinzaine de jours, un rapport écrit détaillé sur tout ce qu’il a vu, vécu et entendu entre 1979 et 1982 dans son réseau terroriste, qu’il croyait au départ, mais à tort, purement de soutien à la cause irlandaise.”
Sans commentaire. Mon scepticisme sur l’attentat de la rue des Rosiers s’est aggravé quand j’ai appris qu’Abou Nidal, alors le terroriste le plus recherché de la planète, avait passé de longues années, en toute tranquillité, dans une villa cossue de Koweit City. Rallié, en 1991, à la coalition anti-irakienne durant la guerre du Golfe, il a néanmoins laissé certains de ses hommes de main participer aux pogroms antipalestiniens qui eurent lieu, justement au Koweit, après le triomphe des troupes américaines. Quoi qu’il en soit, pour le GIGN, à l’époque, c’était “l’alerte rouge”. L’Anschluss du général israélien Sharon avait pour but déclaré de “rendre service au monde” en envoyant Israël “extirper du Liban le terrorisme international”. Nous étions le 6 juin 1982. L’opération “Paix en Galilée” commençait. Deux mois plus tard, les résultats n’étaient pas probants. En “découpant la ville au chalumeau”, selon l’expression d’un rescapé, les blindés du “boucher de Beyrouth” parvinrent, certes, à chasser l’OLP de Yasser Arafat de ses bases, mais pour combien de temps, et surtout, à quel prix ? Au demeurant, aujourd’hui, Yasser Arafat est prix Nobel de la paix, il a remis les pieds, avec ses hommes en armes, sur une parcelle du sol de la Palestine et il a même une représentation à Paris. »
Paul Barril, Guerres secrètes à l’Élysée, Éditions Albin Michel, 1996, pp. 38-40
Fidèle à elle même, la LICrA a entrepris des procédures judiciaires afin de mettre en place une solution finale visant à exterminer les DVD du spectacle« Le Mur » de Dieudonné, et ce, jusqu’au dernier.
Un projet génocidaire sans précédent. Depuis l’invention du DVD, jamais un petit disque en plastique n’avait subi un tel acharnement guidé par une volonté exterminationiste. Il y a toujours moyen d’un petit billet comme en atteste les 5 000 euros accordés à l’officine sioniste en dommages et intérêts.
Presque deux mois jour pour jour après que la France entière ait défilé pour défendre la liberté d’expression derrière les hommes de paix que sont Netanyahu, Hollande, Sarkozy ou encore Bob l’Éponge, cet événement vient remettre en question la crédibilité d’une telle manifestation.
Le gouvernement et la justice sont Charlie mais pas Dieudo.
Contre toutes les lois, le Conseil d’État avait en janvier 2014 purement et simplement interdit le spectacle. La France était devenue officiellement un État de non-droit. Il semblerait que cette décision viennent ressusciter des heures sombres de notre histoire proche.
Dieudonné a fait appel de la décision. Bientôt plus d’information sur Quenel+.
Rejoins le club des glisseurs de Quenelles avant que ce ne soit définitivement interdit !
Pour toute réclamation, veuillez contacter le directeur de publication : Germain Gaiffe Cohen, centrale de Poissy - 17, rue de l'Abbaye, 78303 Poissy Cedex.
“Music expresses that which cannot be put into words and that which cannot remain silent.” ― Victor Hugo Jazz was born as an art form for social commitment through improvisation as a way to express freedom. If a jazz artist is not able to be free in their expression, then the freedom for everyone is at risk. Silencing an artist is complicit in censorship.
We, the undersigned, strongly protest the recent cancellation of the Royal Northern College of Music's concert featuring Gilad Atzmon & The Orient House Ensemble; one of the most successful and critically acclaimed jazz groups in Europe.
It is our understanding that due to pressure from the Zionist Lobby group, the North West Friends of Israel, the concert was cancelled due to a "safety" issue. We... the musicians, artists, listeners, citizens of Britain and the world say:
No to intimidation
No to censorship
No to political pressure
And, that we all must protect the principles of a free society
If the Royal Northern College of Music is committed to keeping Britain a free country, let music and speech flow freely. We call upon the RNCM to immediately reschedule Gilad Atzmon & The Orient House Ensemble’s concert.
We ask the RNCM to not set a precedence in succumbing to pressure and bullying from external forces. Music is one of the few spaces where anything and everything is able to be expressed without the threat of censorship or intimidation.
NB. The RNCM is a leading international conservatoire, training students to world-class levels in music through a specialised learning programme of the highest quality, delivered by internationally renowned teachers and underpinned by a unique artistic programme of performances. The RNCM also is host to a world class theatre that features performers from the United Kingdom, Europe and beyond who seek the opportunity to perform and express their art. Gilad Atzmon is a well-known and deeply respected British Jazz artist and author. Gilad was born in Israel in 1963 and trained at the Rubin Academy of Music, Jerusalem (Composition and Jazz). A multi-instrumentalist he plays saxophones, clarinet and ethnic woodwind instruments . Atzmon tours extensively around the world. His albums, of which he has recorded fifteen to date, explore many themes including those that are political and the music of the Middle East. But it is Atzmon's understanding and expression of the difficult jazz rhythms that resonate with audiences and have the esteem of musical colleagues from around the world. To listen to an Atzmon jazz interpretation is to experience improvisation of a music theme in which he creates a uniqueness of atmosphere and language.
Letter to
Royal Northern College of Music Linda Merrick, Principal
Please reconsider and reverse the concert cancellation of Gilad Atzmon & The Orient House Ensemble.
Music is for the world as it brings people from all walks of life together.
But also artists of all genres must be able to express their art without suppression from outside influences or censorship.
Royal Northern College of Music: Reverse the concert cancellation...
I am signing because I am a sovereign Freeman-on-the-land and I hate totalitarianism!I am for truth, freedom, justice and a moral way of life. We are living more and more under a racist Godless fascist dictatorship and I will never accept any kind of oppression!And I am not Prince Charlie!
BAFS
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.¡Gracias por firmar, Basheer!
Mark Weber, who is the director of the "Institute for Historical Review", says in his address.., "Is an Objective View of Hitler Even Possible?".
The fact that OUTRIGHT lies about Hitler and the Third Reich Germany are widespread and UNCHALLENGED in today's America (as it is also.., in most of the World) !!
The portrayal of Hitler and his regime is GROTESQUELY unbalanced.., not only in the "mass media".., but even in the supposedly.., "authoritative history books" and reference works about that era of history.
Mr. Weber has written extensively on twentieth-century European history.., and is a court-recognized expert on Germany's wartime policy known as the "The Final Solution"...
As always.., after watching.., do your best to "pass it on".....
Dans l’émission The TruthSeeker, Daniel Bushell nous parle de l’arrivée aux Amériques des Blancs européens qui ont massacré plus de 100 millions d’indiens dans ce qui est le plus grand génocide de l’Histoire.Il aborde également les mensonges qui ont servi à couvrir cet Holocauste.
Voilà comment nous les européens nous faisons "place nette" quand nous voulons nous enrichir sur le dos des autres... Nous n'avons donc pas trop de leçons à donner concernant ce que nous appelons "les droits de l'homme" sauf à considérer que ces gens là n'étaient pas des hommes, ce qui en la circonstance fut bien pratique!... Ici on ne parle que de nôtre invasion aux USA.C'était au XVI°s. L'Amérique du sud c'est encore un autre génocide et toujours chez les indiens, mais cette fois là, façon "castagnette"... Pour en savoir plus voir l'excellent documentaire 2015 d'Infolibre sur l'histoire américaine des origines aux crises financières de la fin du 19e siècle en 2 parties: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2ekq6c http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2gprzd
Welcome to the World's First Online Holocaust Museum
Founded in 1996
The Israeli Holocaust Against the Arab and Muslim People
Volume I: 1996 to July, 2006
If any links are not functioning, visitRevisionistHistory.orgfor updates and our latest site map
"The Arabs are Donkeys and Beasts"
"The nation of Israel is pure and the Arabs are a nation of donkeys. They are an evil disaster, an evil devil, and a nasty affliction. The Arabs are donkeys and beasts. They want to take our girls. They are endowed with true filthiness. There is pure and there is impure and they are impure."
--Rabbi David Batzri, head of the Magen David Yeshiva in Jerusalem [Israeli newspaper Haaretz, March 21, 2006]
"One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail."
A Palestinian girl carries her infant brother in the village of Beit Lahiya, Oct. 6, 2004. Both were wounded by Israeli bombs as they slept.
War Crimes which the Corporate Media do not commemorate and the International "Court of Justice" at the Hague will not prosecute
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
At a hospital in Tyre, an Arab mother comforts her infant child who had been badly burned during the Israeli massacre of Lebanese civilians at the U.N. compound at Qana, Lebanon, April 18, 1996
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
A Palestinian David Confronts the Israeli Goliath
Oct. 29, 2000: A Palestinian boy, Fares Udah, 13, confronts an Israeli tank, during an Israeli attack on the outskirts of Gaza City. According to the boy's mother, Enaam Udah, 41, her son survived the encounter with the tank only to be shot dead by the Israelis on Nov. 8, 2000
Israeli Bombings, Assassinations and Massacres in Lebanon Are Not Investigated
The media-engineered hysteria about the "need" to expel Syria from Lebanon, allegedly for the sake of the "independence of Lebanon" and "democracy in the Middle East," displays the usual total amnesia concerning the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, the repeated terror-bombings of Lebanese hospitals, schools and infrastructure by Israelis from Menachem Begin to Ehud Barak, the Israeli establishment of the El Khiam concentration camp in Lebanon staffed by the Zionists' proxy SLA militia; and the lengthy Israeli occupation of Lebanon, which only ended when they were driven out by Lebanon's patriot army Hezbollah, in the year 2000, which has the added distinction of having liberated the El Khiam concentration camp, though this ennobling act has been flushed down the memory hole. The current, contrived drumbeat against Syria in Lebanon takes advantage of the recent assassination of a Syrian politician by persons unknown. The outcry by the neo-cons is the height of hypocrisy however, for Lebanon has been a veritable theater of Israeli assassinations, most notably that of Lebanese national Elie Hobeika, who Ariel Sharon rubbed out gangland style on Jan. 24, 2002 because Hobeika was about to testify against his former pal Sharon in a war crimes trial in Belgium. In true Mafia fashion, with the witness murdered, the case against Sharon, who oversees a vast assassination ("targeted killing") apparatus, collapsed. Coverage of the Lebanese protest against Sharon's murder of Hobeika was suppressed by the US news media, which treated the assassination as a trifling matter, hardly worthy of reporting or commentary.
Why was there no UN investigation into Hobeika's murder? What of the Israeli Mossad's bombing of a Maronite Catholic Church in Lebanon 1994? What of the Israeli massacre of civilians at Qana, Lebanon in 1996? All down the memory hole!
From Fisher and Erlanger, in the NY Times, July 3, 2006: "The strikes appeared to be a direct response to the instructions of the Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, who told subordinates at a cabinet meeting on Sunday that he intended to make the lives of Gazans ever more miserable until the captured soldier, 19-year-old Cpl. Gilad Shalit, was released...Mr. Olmert, whose air force has already bombed Gaza's bridges, crippled its only power plant, shelled the Palestinian prime minister's office here and subjected all 1.4 million Gaza residents to night after night of sleep-depriving sonic booms, said he had ordered the military and government 'to do everything in order to bring Gilad back home.' "...the Israel military has been steadily increasing the pressure, on both the militant groups and Palestinians generally...The message, underscored regularly by Israeli officials, is that Israel would not hesitate to assassinate top Hamas leaders...Israel('s)... attacks on the infrastructure in Gaza...the bombing of the power plant, which is partly owned by an American company...still smoking four days after all six of its transformers were hit ? was visited Sunday both by the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, and the United Nations special coordinator for the Middle East peace process, Álvaro de Soto. Two days ago, Israeli warplanes also bombed the entrances to all four access roads to the plant, which is insured by the United States Overseas Private Investment Corporation, or OPIC...." (end quote) The destruction of civilian infrastructure and property and the attacks on civilians by Israeli forces, constitute, as the Israeli Prime Minister virtually admits, collective punishment of the entire population of the Gaza Strip, a violation of Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is now on record at his cabinet meeting declaring "that he intended to make the lives of Gazans ever more miserable." This is a remarkable public confession of barbarity that even a few years ago would have been concealed behind an Israeli smokescreen of humanitarian rhetoric and misdirection. But there's little need for concealment now. Answer me: what head of state of which super-power nation on earth, be it Russia, China, the US, Britain or France, could make the following statement: "We intend to make the lives of Judaics in Israeli territory ever more miserable"? Not one would dream or dare to do so. Any head of state making the preceding statement while his military placed the Judaic population under siege, shutting off their power and water and sending tanks and fighter jets to harass their women and children, would be brought to the bar of history, tarred and feathered, hunted down, lynched, or shot like a dog to the near-universal applause of the West. Nothing like that will befall Olmert or his generals any time soon. They are immune to war crimes trials. They are above the law which they have established for others. Judiacs, according to their sacred rabbinic texts, are a higher order of humanity, and cannot be judged by any outside legal body or nation. Their attitude toward editorials and columns criticizing them is, this too shall pass. Indeed, there was some editorial outcry in the spring of 2002 when the Israelis committed dozens of war crimes and atrocities, also in Gaza, but all forgotten/forgiven now. When UN war crimes investigators in 2002 attempted to interview Palestinian survivors of that onslaught, the Israelis told the UN to go to hell. There were no repercussions from the UN for that arrogant defiance on the part of a rogue state. The UN shrugged its shoulders, put its tail between its legs and called it a day. Today, the Palestinian civilians murdered in 2002 are just a statistic compiled by a few record keepers. Otherwise their deaths don't register. This is the bleakest testimony of the sub-human status of Palestinians under Judaism. Israelis can do whatever they like to these subject people and there is no discernible punishment for "Israel," except perhaps for the fact that in an Internet age, every day a few thousand more Westerners finally grasp what the murderous ideology of Judeo-Zionism represents and become morally revolted and permanently turned-off by everything Israeli. But the Israelis obviously don't care. They are in their supremacist phase and they don't need to care. Ehud Olmert is collectively punishing the hapless, trapped Palestinian people according to the doctrine of Chazal, Rambam and the modern halakhic authorities. This is what needs to be exhaustively documented from their own original and unimpeachable Aramaic and Hebrew sources, and then hammered constantly from every housetop, street corner, newsletter and website that we own, control or influence. The Israelis grow ever more bold. The Zionist New York Times is serving as the Revelation of the Method mouthpiece, no longer even bothering to put up a front, as they have in the past. They openly announce and admit that Israelis are collectively punishing an entire nation of people. They do not fear the repercussions in international law because for Holy People possessed of Divine Blood, there aren't any.
If any links are not functioning, visit RevisionistHistory.orgfor updates and our latest site map
Judaism is not a normal adversary,it is an exceptional recrudescence of the guile synthesized from the accumulated intelligence of the eternal pagan psychodrama on which it is based. One of the most refractory intellectual and practical difficulties that scholars of integrity face in the post-modernist era is deciding how to apply to Judaism the same critical scrutiny to which Christianity and Islam are subjected, without being defamed as a "hater."
The completion of my bookJudaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceitgives me the satisfaction of knowing that I have accomplished one of the principal missions of my life. It is the actualization of thoughts and lines of inquiry which I have been pursuing for years. For example, Who is a Jew? What is the role of counterfeit "Jews"? If the counterfeit is predominant, then this fact opens a revolutionary vista on history, signifying that contemporary Talmudists and Zionists are descendants of people who were not in Palestine when Jesus was crucified. They are representatives of the ideology that crucified Christ, but in general, not the race. This fact in turn disarms the race-based antipathy of the opponents of Talmudists and Zionists, a racial animus upon which, ironically, the rabbis and the Israelis depend for the continued allegiance of their ownam ha'aretz.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Years ago I noticed that disinformation about the Kabbalah had been seeded - the illusion of a fissure between Talmudism and Kabbalism was deliberately sown - using the figure of Moses Maimonides to pretend that these two supporting "pillars" of the Third Temple are inimical. I searched the texts of Maimonides, however, for hidden Kabbalistic sympathies, and found clear evidence of Kabbalistic doctrine.
One goal in writingJudaism Discoveredhas been to transcend the current state of Talmud criticism; which is largely centered on the repetition of a what amounts to slogans: 1. the "Talmud defames Jesus and Mary"; 2. the "Talmud is pornographic." There's nothing erroneous in stating that the Talmud contains these disgusting scurrilities, which indeed it does. The problem is, that's where what passes for anti-Talmudic "scholarship" begins and ends these days; there may be some brief reference topilpulandPaRDeS, but the current state of Talmud and Kabbalah criticism is mostly superficial and leaves most of the big questions unanswered.
For example, very few critics seem to understand that Judaism is neither Left wing nor Right wing; it manifests as Leftist or Rightist at will. One moment it is the instrumental ally of the Throne; in the next, it is the revolutionary power that overthrows it.
I sought routes into Judaism from dozens of investigative approaches, beginning with, pro forma, the irrefutable fact of the existence of the Jesus and Mary Talmudic blasphemies, and the truth that the Old Testament is not the foundation of Judaism. I expand on these themes, based on my original excavation in my book from 2000,Judaism's Strange Gods. It is necessary to prove, from the rabbinic texts themselves, that Judaism is not an Old Testament faith; and to unravel for all time the confusing series of feints that attempt to mislead the truth-seeker into believing that Jesus is not in the Talmud, or that if He is, just barely.
But the Revelation of the Method being what it is in this dispensation, even positive confirmation that the Talmud blasphemes Our Savior and His Mother and possesses allegiance to an extra-Biblical gnosis, has elicited controverting apologia from prominent rabbis, all of whom seek to "contextualize" these revelations by placing them in a framework of a Roman Holocaust/Nazi Holocaust typology that renders Judaism's defamation of Christianity as "understandable" from the point of view of post-modernism's acceptance of the rabbinic exceptionalism clause: Judaic suffering is magnitudes above the historic experience of other nations. Therefore, fierce rabbinic hatred for Romans/gentiles/Christians/Europeans has at times been understandable, if "harsh."
To overcome this exceptionalism, this writer sought to plumb the depths of the rabbinic texts and not content myself merely with detection of the degenerate libels of Jesus Christ and the Blessed Virgin Mary in, for example, theGemara.
Though we are not dealing with the "Jewish" race of antiquity, we are dealing with a rabbinic spirit which functions as a kind of ideological organism; an organism which exhibits as one of its most striking features, the ability to reinvent itself in response to the light of exposure. When an informed researcher documents that Judaism is "A," it becomes "B." When "B" is understood by the public as an antithesis of Judaism's thesis "A," Judaism transmogrifies into synthesis "C," and so forth, in an endless and bewildering historical metamorphosis that has deceived and gulled generations. I have sought to shatter this recurring shadow play.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
The student of rabbinic religion who dogmatically categorizes Orthodox Judaism as inevitably Left wing or Right wing, Zionist or anti-Zionist, anti-Muslim or pro-Muslim, will defeat himself and confuse all who adhere to this erroneous proposition; a proposition which Judaism itself is pleased to project; just as it sees the silver lining in being regarded as the scion of those who crucified Christ, since those malefactors were genetic Israelites, however gravely disordered in their behavior.
The paradox here is that whoever is genetically descended from the murderers of Jesus must be acknowledged as a racial Jew and an Israelite, and this identification has, throughout history, triggered the strange awe and wonder for these supposed "Jews" which their alleged consanguinity with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Jesus Himself, engenders among the gentiles, in a kind of love-hate relationship which has been played throughout history. Even the "Christ-killer" invective has utility for the rabbis, by perpetuating the hunted/hounded, persecuted martyr image, which Judaism has capitalized upon to great effect, particularly since 1945.
What would be the point of publishing yet another dreary "Jew-bashing" book that indelibly stigmatizes 21st century Talmudists with the two brands they themselves have been past masters at manipulating and cultivating: the myth of their descent from Abraham, and the stereotype of them as people it is our duty to hate and hound? I would not have spent a good deal of my life investigating Judaism if I were going to regurgitate self-defeating images which the rabbis themselves covertly sow and perpetuate to their advantage. Let me impart to you a signal discovery: whoever hates Judaics perpetuates the rule of the rabbis.
It has been my objective to craftJudaism Discoveredso that there is no possibility of a rational refutation of it. While it's true that the book's evidence and arguments can be twisted, misrepresented and demonized with smears and falsification, the information inJudaism Discoveredcannot be easily disarmed, because much of it pertains to epistemology, e.g. Judaism's knowledge of itself and the ways in which it responds to discovery.
If inJudaism DiscoveredI have successfully anticipated the rabbinic epistemology, then what I teach concerning rabbinic dissimulation is valuable not just as a history of Judaism's past, but as a guide to rabbinic machinations and strategizing in the future. My mission does not consist in merely conveying a set of facts to the reader, but rather to teach how to deconstruct the deceitful tactical and strategic feints which Judaism wields as a response to the dissemination of accurate knowledge about its inner doctrines. Judaism Discoveredarms the reader to penetrate and expose the disingenuous elements of virtually every rabbinic act of camouflage and misdirection. If this knowledge of how to decode Judaism were to become widespread, it could have far-ranging consequences. It could result in a radical revision of western culture, so steeped are "our" intelligenstia in the pieties and platitudes of the rabbinic gestalt, which forms a foundational narrative through which virtually all contemporary western thinking about religion and history are filtered. Judaism Discoveredalso has the potential to spark a revival of ancient western verities long abandoned by supposed paragons of 20th and 21st century "conservatism" - these "paragons" having concocted a bastard, "Judeo-Christian family values" movement, which is so deranged it places Orthodox rabbis at the front of the barricades. The "conservative" mania for proclaiming a movement for restoration of Christian culture inclusive of Talmudic rabbis, is a betrayal of the wisdom and vision of every Biblical prophet and every Christian saint. It is on the basis of this desperate craving for looking good in the eyes of the world and its media empire, that the clergy of Christendom ally and even pray with rabbis who worship not God but themselves. Judaism Discoveredoffers an empiric and strictly factual discovery of Judaism's deepest operational and spiritual secrets, and in particular Judaism's extremely circumspect epistemology of concealment; its chameleon-like propensity for projecting an adapted outward image synchronized with the prevailing zeitgeist, even while the hostile fires of its inner volcanic core of hate, burn with an intensity undimmed since 33 A.D.
Conversely, it has also been this writer's mission to endeavor to remove the ground from under classical "anti-semitism" and "Jew hate," and to show how these brittle, senile, clichéd and programmed responses actually fulfill the rabbinic prediction of gentile bigotry, a prophecy which they impart to Judaic youth and by which they maintain these unfortunate persons in bondage to Judaism throughout their adult lives.
Digital Amazon "Kindle" edition is for salehere. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ News Bureau
Michael Hoffman's Revisionist News Bureau February 24, 2015•(Previous columns:Archive) Contact: hoffman(at)revisionisthistory.org(substitute @ for "at" in the preceding e-mail address) Twitter: @HoffmanMichaelA Special offers and bulletins by e-mail via "The Hoffman Wire" - send e-mail to: hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org with "Subscribe Hoffman Wire" in the header ______________________________________________________________________ Online Bookstore for credit card customers in the U.S., Canada and Overseas: Revisionist history and conspiracy books, CDs, DVDs, newsletters at our online store ________________________________________________________________________ Our printed catalog For U.S. residents who wish to pay by check or money order via the U.S. Mail _________________________________________________________________________ Please assist our Truth Mission by making a donation Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. My debate with Netanyahu in 1994 ______________________________________________
Revisionist Historyissue no. 76 Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Charlie Hebdo Hypocrisy Michael Hoffman offers an insightful analysis of the contrived “clash of civilizations”narrative behind the West’s hypocritical anguish over the tragic massacre of the editors and artists of a French newspaper attacked by “Arab terrorists.” He reveals the Talmudic tunnel vision that encourages free expression against Islam and prohibits and even criminalizes criticism and doubts about rabbinic Judaism and Holocaustianity. Sections include: Thought Criminals Down the Memory Hole; Misconceptions about Freedom of Speech in Islam and Judaism; the case of Stephen Whittle and Simon Sheppard; the neocon infiltration of the churches; Theories of knowledge: does errror have rights? Cass Sunstein and the French revolutionaries didn't think so; Christ’s own scriptural standard for judging Judaism and Islam; and more. Also in this issue:Was the Charlie Hebdo Terror Attack Engineered by the Cryptocracy? A study in anomalies. Plus: Movie Review — “American Sniper: A Sheep Dog Tricked into Serving the Wolves.” And: Censorship Watch — latest reports of writers and artists fired or prosecuted for the thought crime of “antisemitism.” Also: “Revisionist News and Notes.”
On Feb 19, 2015, at 8:11, Stan< @comcast.net> wrote:
Hello Michael,
Was it Bibi or Paul Wolfowitz that you commented about once as wearing mis-matching socks and exhibiting some other traits of poor grooming? Bibi is just a schmuck from Philadelphia, right?
I “debated" Netanyahu for about ten minutes during a lengthy question-and-answer (after sitting in the seat directly behind him while he was being introduced), at Albright Auditorium in New York, on the campus of Hobart & William Smith Colleges, January 20, 1994.
He’s not a schmuck, but he is a ham actor who has credibility like the Wizard of Oz, from behind a screen; in his case a media screen. I had no trouble with him when I confronted him about his Likud party’s record of anti-Arab terror. The audience, which he had just a few minutes before in the palm of his hand, sat in stunned silence as I tore into him. I was able to do real damage over his ignorant claim that Americans had difficulty understanding the Israeli experience because we had never had an enemy on our border. I reminded him of a little something known as the Mexican-American War of 1846-1848. I had a lot of fun with him.
He’s the type of dictator the Israeli people and the US media rally around; that is his attraction, as a strongman of the Stalinist type.
One more point: I was a well known anti-Zionist in 1994, yet I could sit directly behind him, where I observed his polyester suit, the dandruff on his collar, etc. There were no metal detectors at the door of the auditorium. He arrived with only one personal bodyguard and there were two local rent-a-cops hired for the occasion.
This was at a time when Zionist Steve Emerson (who continues to remain an “authority on terrorism” according to the media), was traveling the country and the TV and radio airwaves, declaring there was a deadly Islamic terror network operating inside the US. Obviously, Netanyahu knew better.
Dans l’émission The TruthSeeker, Daniel Bushell nous parle de l’arrivée aux Amériques des Blancs européens qui ont massacré plus de 100 millions d’indiens dans ce qui est le plus grand génocide de l’Histoire.Il aborde également les mensonges qui ont servi à couvrir cet Holocauste.
Voilà comment nous les européens nous faisons "place nette" quand nous voulons nous enrichir sur le dos des autres... Nous n'avons donc pas trop de leçons à donner concernant ce que nous appelons "les droits de l'homme" sauf à considérer que ces gens là n'étaient pas des hommes, ce qui en la circonstance fut bien pratique!... Ici on ne parle que de nôtre invasion aux USA.C'était au XVI°s. L'Amérique du sud c'est encore un autre génocide et toujours chez les indiens, mais cette fois là, façon "castagnette"... Pour en savoir plus voir l'excellent documentaire 2015 d'Infolibre sur l'histoire américaine des origines aux crises financières de la fin du 19e siècle en 2 parties: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2ekq6c http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2gprzd
*If you haven't already done so, be sure to sign up for our FREE Updates List at bottom of page.
INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW
Mark Weber speaks on Hitler's Place in History
Published on 20 Mar 2012
Mark Weber, who is the director of the "Institute for Historical Review", says in his address.., "Is an Objective View of Hitler Even Possible?".
The fact that OUTRIGHT lies about Hitler and the Third Reich Germany are widespread and UNCHALLENGED in today's America (as it is also.., in most of the World) !!
The portrayal of Hitler and his regime is GROTESQUELY unbalanced.., not only in the "mass media".., but even in the supposedly.., "authoritative history books" and reference works about that era of history.
Mr. Weber has written extensively on twentieth-century European history.., and is a court-recognized expert on Germany's wartime policy known as the "The Final Solution"...
As always.., after watching.., do your best to "pass it on".....
By 1936, the future British Prime Minister of Britain, the warmongering Winston Churchill, had repeatedly upset the people of Germany by libeling and slandering their beloved leader, Adolf Hitler. But a former British Prime Minister, David Lloyd George, held a very different view of Hitler; whom he referred to as "the George Washington of Germany".
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
I Talked To Hitler
By The Right Honourable DAVID LLOYD GEORGE
The Daily Express -London
November 17, 1936
I have just returned from a visit to Germany. In so short time one can only form impressions or at least check impressions which years of distant observation through the telescope of the Press and constant inquiry from those who have seen things at a closer range had already made on one's mind.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
I have now seen the famous German Leader and also something of the great change he has effected. Whatever one may think of his methods - and they are certainly not those of a parliamentary country - there can be no doubt that he has achieved a marvellous transformation in the spirit of the people, in their attitude towards each other, and in their social and economic outlook.
He rightly claimed at Nuremberg that in four years his movement has made a new Germany. It is not the Germany of the first decade that followed the war - broken, dejected, and bowed down with a sense of apprehension and impotence. It is now full of hope and confidence, and of a renewed sense of determination to lead its own life without interference from any influence outside its own frontiers.
There is for the first time since the war a general sense of security. The people are more cheerful. There is a greater sense of general gaiety of spirit throughout the land. It is a happier Germany. I saw it everywhere and Englishmen I met during my trip and who knew Germany well were very impressed with the change.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
One man has accomplished this miracle. He is a born leader of men. A magnetic, dynamic personality with a single-minded purpose, a resolute will and a dauntless heart. He is not merely in name but in fact the national Leader. He has made them safe against potential enemies by whom they were surrounded. He is also securing them against that constant dread of starvation, which is one of the poignant memories of the last years of the War and the first years of the Peace.
Over 700,000 died of sheer hunger in those dark years. You can still see the effect in the physique of those who were born into that bleak world. The fact that Hitler has rescued his country from the fear of a repetition of that period of despair, penury and humiliation has given him unchallenged authority in modern Germany.
As to his popularity, especially among the youth of Germany, there can be no manner of doubt. The old trust him; the young idolise him. It is not the admiration accorded to a popular Leader. It is the worship of a national hero who has saved his country from utter despondency and degradation.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
It is true that public criticism of the Government is forbidden in every form. That does not mean that criticism is absent. I have heard the speeches of prominent Nazi orators freely condemned. But not a word of criticism or of disapproval have I heard of Hitler. He is as immune from criticism as a king in a monarchical country. He is something more. He is the George Washington of Germany - the man who won for his country independence from all her oppressors.
To those who have not actually seen and sensed the way Hitler reigns over the heart and mind of Germany this description may appear extravagant. All the same, it is the bare truth. This great people will work better, sacrifice more, and, if necessary, fight with greater resolution because Hitler asks them to do so. Those who do not comprehend this central fact cannot judge the present possibilities of modern Germany.
On the other hand, those who imagine that Germany has swung back to its old Imperialist temper cannot have any understanding of the character of the change. The idea of a Germany intimidating Europe with a threat that its irresistible army might march across frontiers forms no part of the new vision.
What Hitler said at Nuremberg is true. The Germans will resist to the death every invader at their own country, but they have no longer the desire themselves to invade any other land.(*Tomato Bubble Note: Actually, Germany had no desire to invade other lands during World War I either; a war which had also been forced upon her). The leaders of modern Germany know too well that Europe is too formidable a proposition to be overrun and trampled down by any single nation, however powerful may be its armaments. They have learned that lesson in the war.
Hitler fought in the ranks throughout the war, and knows from personal experience what war means. He also knows too well that the odds are even heavier today against an aggressor than they were at that time. What was then Austria would now be in the main hostile to the ideals of 1914.
The Germans are under no illusions about Italy. They also are aware that the Russian Army is in every respect far more efficient than it was in 1914. The establishment of a German hegemony in Europe which was the aim and dream of the old pre-war militarism, is not even on the horizon of Nazism.
The Daily Express (London)
September 17, 1936
The LIES that have been told to you about Hitler and World War II will shock you! Read 'The Bad War' (pdf or book) and see.
Only when you fully understand the MONSTROUS LIES told about Adolf Hitler and World War II, can you fully understand the current drive for World War III!
Many readers have asked if Hitler visits Oprah is also available in physical book format. Yes it is!
Physical copy ordering instructions at bottom of page.
The pdf and webpage versions of 'Hitler visits Oprah' are available for a small donation.
Hard copy buyers will also receive webpage and pdf access
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
PREVIEW BELOW
With Guest Appearances and Fiery Debate Between Historians "Franz X" and Doris Kearns Goodwin
ENTERTAINMENT AS EDUCATION
It's the interview of the century. The Fuehrer himself visits the Queen of daytime talk, Oprah Winfrey. What will Oprah ask him? How will Hitler respond? How will the audience respond? Can he win over the hostile crowd with his charm and intellect? Or will he be mercilessly booed off the stage?
Packed with 150 pages of solid information, 200 powerful images, fast paced dialogue, and lots of emotion,laughter, and twists, Mike King's Hitler visits Oprah is destined for Internet Classic status. You won't want to miss it!
Whether you are a beginner, or an advanced student, you will want to keep Hitler visits Oprah as a powerful educational resource to share with friends or family who want to be entertained. It's perfect for "sheeple" and young students too.
Hitler visits Oprah comes in web page, pdf, & paperback copy formats (scroll down). Have a look at the free preview below, and order today.
"When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic."
- Dresden James
ACT I
OPENING STATEMENT
The following "interview", though obviously a fictitional event, accurately portrays what the ghost of Adolf Hitler would say in his defense. His "answers" to Oprah's questions are mostly based upon an extensive and careful reading of his writings and speeches from 1921-1945, as well as those of his inner circle.
One is at liberty to reflexively dismiss the veracity or accuracy of Hitler's answers, if one so chooses. However, what cannot be disputed, is that Hitler's responses to Oprah's questions truly represent what he would say if such an interview were possible. Indeed, some of Hitler's answers are direct quotes taken from his own speeches and writings.
In regard to Oprah's reaction, admittedly some "artistic license" was taken there. But as for the accuracy of all quotes, facts, and events presented in this work, all of them can be easily verified by way of a simple Google Internet search. Don't let the whimsical setting of "Hitler visits Oprah"distract you too much, for this is utterly serious and scholarly history. Enjoy the show.
(Oprah walks out to loud applause, hugging and high-fiving her audience members as she walks towards the stage.)
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Oprah: Thank you! Thank you!
Today, we have a special surprise guest that is going to shock America.
It was the year 1945 when, surrounded by the advancing Red Army, he and Eva Braun, his new bride of just hours, took their lives in a Berlin bunker. He had risen up from obscurity after World War I, and built a movement that shaped the historical events of his day. At the pinnacle of his power, his armies once dominated Europe from the Atlantic to gates of Moscow, and from North Africa to Scandinavia. Along the way he murdered 6 million Jews and terrorized an entire continent.
Today, we bring you a world exclusive interview with the man we all know as a monster, but whose German people knew as‘The Fuehrer’.
Ladies and gentlemen, give it up for Adolf Hitlerrrrr!
(Hitler walks out, ‘Seig Heil’ saluting and waving to the stunned crowd of mostly hysterical females. The audience gasps in horror as Hitler removes his hat and kisses Oprah’s hand.They then begin to boo and hiss loudly.
.
Shoes and water bottles are thrown at Hitler. Shouts of “murderer”, “Nazi bastard”, “anti-Semite” and “Kill him again” ring forth from the angry mob. Oprah’s security guards restrain a few of the more passionate audience members from rushing the stage.)
Oprah: (motioning towards the crowd) Settle down people. Settle down. I don’t like him either but he is our guest. (turning towards Hitler) I’m sorry for the rude reception but you knew it was coming.
Hitler: It’s quite all right. Forgive them Frau Winfrey, for they know not what they do.
Oprah: (motioning towards her chairs with her hand) Let’s have a seat shall we?
Hitler: Danke
(Oprah again motions with her hand for the audience to settle down. After a minute or two, the agitated mob regains its composure. Oprah begins her interview of Hitler.)
Oprah: Well, not exactly like the receptions you used to get at those Nuremberg rallies is it Mr. Hitler?
(The audience laughs and jeers.)
Hitler: (chuckling) No Frau Winfrey, not exactly. But given the fact that 70 years of malicious lies and mind-bending propaganda have been imposed upon your lovely audience, it’s to be expected. But I will make a prediction. By the time we are finished here today Frau Winfrey, they will have a very different opinion of me. Of that I am quite certain. And please, call me Adolf.
Oprah: Oh. Now I’m intrigued. And please, call me Oprah.
Hitler: OK Oprah.
Oprah: So Adolf. Tell me. How do you intend to change our minds about you?
Hitler: By answering all of your questions the only way I know how, by telling the absolute truth!
Oprah: The truth according to you?
Hitler: Not my version of the truth Oprah, but the eternal truth as witnessed by the All Mighty. Do not mistake me for one of your deceiving degenerate democratic politicians, whose sole object is power, self aggrandizement, and pleasing the mob. As you Americans now say, “that is not how I roll.” I have always said what I meant, and meant what I said. Go ahead Oprah. Try me, and let your studio and TV audiences determine if my words ring true or not.
You will arrive at your own verdict of course, but how can it be a just one without at least giving the accused a full and fair hearing? Justice demands that both sides of a case be heard. You have heard 70 years of accusations leveled against Germany. I ask but a fraction of that time to present our version of events, something which your history books have never done.
Oprah: Fair enough. Let’s jump right into this and hear what you have to say. But before we get started on politics and history, I need to clear the air about something. I have to tell you Adolf, that I, as an African-American woman, was deeply offended and disgusted over that movie reel of you storming out of the stadium after Jesse Owens won his Gold Medals at the 1936 Berlin Olympics. How dare you! I don’t care how much you hate Black folk. You showed no class whatsoever by disrespectfully snubbing a guest to your country like that.
(The audience cheers loudly for Oprah.)
Oprah: We have a newspaper headline from that time. (motions towards screen)
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Hitler: My dear Oprah. First of all, I do not hate other races. My motto is: respect all peoples, but love your own.
Oprah: But you do favor Aryans, correct?
Hitler: Of course I do. Who else is going to look after our interests and safety? Mr. Obama? (Hitler laughs) Is there a problem with naturally identifying with one's own people? After all, in June of 2013, you yourself donated $12 million dollars to the National Museum of African American History, did you not?
Oprah: Well, yeah, but...
Hitler: But nothing! You could have given that money to a European museum, or to poor White children. Instead, you showed preference to your own people. You see Oprah, a natural love and loyalty for one's own people does not equate to hatred of other races, anymore than love for one's own children equates to hatred of your next door neighbor's children.
Oprah: You have a point there, Adolf. I must confess.
Hitler: Now, as to the event in question, the Owens affair. Your propaganda press lied then, as they still do today. Those movie reel clips were spliced together by deceitful anti-German propagandists. Herr Owens winning the race, and my leaving the stadium, are two separate and unrelated events. I never snubbed the young man at all. Owens was cheered by the German crowds, interviewed on German radio, and befriended by our athletes.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Left: German crowds cheered the amazing feats of Jesse Owens. Right: Owens and German Long Jump competitor, Luz Long, became friends and pen pals. They exchanged letters right up until Long died in World War II.
Hitler: Herr Owens himself has, on several occasions, confirmed that we waved to each other as he passed by me. Here, read Herr Owens’s own statements.
(Hitler pulls out an index card from his briefcase and hands it to Oprah)
Oprah: “When I passed the Chancellor, he arose, waved his hand at me, and I waved back. I think the writers showed bad taste in criticizing the man of the hour in Germany.”
Hitler: Here is another.
(Hands card to Oprah)
Oprah: "Hitler didn't snub me -it was FDR who snubbed me. The president didn’t even send me a telegram."
Oh my Lord! This is news to me. So the Jesse Owens snub was a lie?
Hitler: Absolutely. But there’s more Oprah. Owens and I had a photograph taken together, while shaking hands. I found him to be a most gracious and polite young man.
Oprah: Wait a minute! You’re claiming you took a photo with Jesse Owens? I find that very hard to believe Adolf. Why didn’t Owens ever show this photo to anyone?
Hitler: Herr Owens was smart enough to know that if he destroyed the “snub” myth, it could have a negative effect upon his future opportunities. He carried the photo in his wallet, and finally showed it to German sports writers in the 1960’s. He asked the writers if they would publish it, but they could not. One of the writers, Siegfried Mischner, finally confirmed this in 2009. (here) I know not what became of Herr Owens's copy of the photo, but I still have mine. I anticipated that this matter would come up, so I brought it with me. Your people have all of my exhibits. Can we get the Owens photo up please?
(Hitler points to the big screen. The image of Owens and him appears.)
Oprah: Oh-My-God!
*Below is a photo-shopped artistic rendering. Owens's photo was never seen in America and disappeared after his death.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
(The audience gasps in disbelief and begins to stir.)
Hitler: One final point, Herr Owens is very prominently featured in Olympia, the official German documentary of the Games. So, as you can see my dear ladies, and gentlemen, your propaganda press has lied to you. And I can assure you, the ludicrous litany of lies extends far beyond the deliberate distortion regarding my conduct towards Herr Owens.
Oprah: I am so sorry I attacked you over this issue Adolf. I am at a total loss for words.
Hitler: No need to apologize my Chocolate sister. It is your government and your press that should apologize for lying to you and your audience.
Oprah: "Chocolate sister", Ha Ha Ha. That's funny. Don't even mention chocolate. That's one of my weaknesses.
Hitler: That is quite evident.
Oprah: Adolf!
Hitler: Just kidding my dear.
Oprah: You may have cleared your name on this Jesse Owens story Adolf, but you still have a whole lot of other things to answer for.
Hitler: Bring it on baby!
Oprah: OK. Let’s get started. Now you weren’t actually born in Germany. You were born in Austria in 1889. Tell us about your childhood and early years.
Hitler: At that time, Austria was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Austrians are Germans. Any distinction between Austrians and Germans is artificial. Austrians, Bavarians, Prussians, Hessians - we were all German. My mother’s name was Klara. She was a saintly woman, totally devoted to her children. I had a younger sister named Paula, and two half siblings from my father's first marriage.
My father was a customs official named Alois. He wanted me to follow in his footsteps, but I wanted to become an artist. We often clashed over this. Father passed away in 1903. Though I honored and respected my father, I truly loved my mother. It was she who instilled in me the belief that I could accomplish anything if I believed in myself. I was devastated and inconsolable when she passed in 1907.
(Hitler pauses as he regains his composure.)
Oprah:(putting her arm on Hitler’s shoulder) She sounds like a wonderful woman Adolf.We have a picture of her, and a baby picture of you. (motioning toward the big screen) Klara Hitler and the Baby Fuehrer.
Klara Hitler / Adolf as a baby and as an adolescent
"Outwardly, his love for his mother was his most striking feature. While he was not a "mother's boy" in the usual sense, I have never witnessed a closer attachment...In the practice of my profession it is natural that I should have witnessed many scenes such as this one, yet none of them left me with quite the same impression. In all my career I have never seen anyone so prostrate with grief as Adolf Hitler."
Jewish Dr. Eduard Bloch - on Hitler's reaction to his mother's death.
Oprah: So now, your just 18 years old, dirt poor, both of your parents are gone, and you have no connections. You originally wanted to become an artist, a painter. What happens now?
Hitler: I had moved to Vienna in 1905 and supported myself by selling my paintings and drawings. I was disappointed and confused when my application to the Vienna Academy of Artwas rejected. Whereas I was a classical artist, the Marxist inspired trend towards degenerate “modern art” was already growing. Perhaps that is why I was rejected.
Oprah: Well, I have to admit Adolf, having reviewed some of your work, I too cannot understand why you were rejected. It’s really quite good. Look at these images. They are beautiful. (motioning towards the screen)
(The audience gasps as the images flash by one at a time.)
Oprah: I had no idea you could paint like this! I’d buy these for sure. People! Let’s give it up for Hitler the fine artist.
(The audience applauds lightly.)
Hitler: (bowing) Danke. Danke.
Oprah: So. You were turned down from the Academy in 1908. Then what?
Hitler: I drifted. Alone and poor, I spent my time painting and devouring the great books of the library. I often read one book per day. My education is self taught.
Oprah: What did you study?
Hitler: Everything I could get my hands on; literature, philosophy, architecture, science, history, poetry. My appetite for knowledge was limitless, as was my aptitude for retaining information. More importantly, I also spent much of my time thinking, reflecting, and observing how the world around me works. Material poverty sharpened me and taught me great lessons.
Oprah: And then came The Great War.
Hitler: Yes. In 1914, a war that was forced upon Austria-Hungary and the German-Reich.
Oprah: Forced upon the Germany and Austria-Hungary? Explain.
Hitler: By 1914, the German Reich had become a great economic power. For reasons rooted in ignorance of economics, and also to petty envy, some in Britain and France wished to see Germany defeated, divided and controlled. Standing above and behind this Allied desire was the International Jewish Money Power, which also sought to bring the emerging German powerhouse, as well as the rest of Europe, under their Communist-Capitalist yoke of control.
Germany was bound to a mutual defense Treaty with Austria-Hungary, and also the Ottoman Turkish Empire. These three states were known as “The Central Powers”. On the other side, Britain, France, and Russia were also parties to a defense treaty, “The Entente”. One wrong move, and this powder keg of adversarial alliances could explode at any time.
Oprah: Right. I do remember learning about the competing alliances in history class. Except I never heard the part about the jealousy towards Germany and the Jewish angle.
Hitler: Remember Oprah. History is written by the winners.
Oprah: Good point. So, wasn’t there some assassination that kicked off the war?
Hitler: Yes. The Austrian Arch-Duke Francis Ferdinand and his wife Sophie were murdered by Serbian conspirators controlled by an unseen hand. The Jewish controlled Austrian Press then spewed forth relentless propaganda against the Balkan nation of Serbia. Serbia was falsely accused of controlling the Serbian minority within the Austria-Hungarian Empire. The great danger here was the fact that Russia was the protector of Serbia. Any war against Serbia would trigger a conflict between the Entente and the Central Powers.
To read the rest of "Hitler visits Oprah" (webpage and also 150 page pdf), please make a minimum $7 donation below. You may also want to take advantage of some of the other package offers as well. You will receive webpage access and pdf within 2- 5 hours of payment.
DONATE SAFE & SECURE VIA PAYPAL OR REGULAR CREDIT CARD
YOU DO NOT HAVE TO OPEN A PAYPAL ACCOUNT
Click on the Blue Credit Card icon of your choice, and enter your own donation amount.
Veterans Today est un média alternatif populaire aux États-Unis. C’est la seconde fois en deux mois qu’ils consacrent un article autour de l’univers de Dieudonné, dont ils semblent être devenus fans.
Voici l’article traduit par nos soins et quelque peu agrémenté d’images de notre cru :
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Dieudonné fait des émules outre-Atlantique ! Chacun prend son mètre et mesure la profondeur de la glissade, de la Quenelle conventionnelle à la Quenelle artisanale faite en atelier, en passant par les épaulées et les coudées… même les manchots s’y mettent !
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC au nom de la bigoterie « chevaleresque » qui consiste à soutenir un État d’apartheid !
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC au nom de la violence démente avec laquelle les colons israéliens brûlent les champs et les oliviers palestiniens, commettent des actes de violence, prennent d’assaut des maisons et enlèvent des enfants en plein milieu de la nuit.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Glissez une Quenelle au racisme sur Facebook, au mensonge éhonté du discours « nous n’avons pas de partenaire pour la paix », et à l’extension des colonies illégales sur des territoires volés chaque jour de façon perfide.
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC pour tous les gros tas de politiciens véreux qui portent une kippa et embrassent le mur des Lamentations tout en faisant les bouffons de la cour tels des goyimà la recherche de la rédemption, mais qui n’auront même pas « l’honneur » d’être enterrés dans un cimetière juif après une vie de servitude.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC pour le silence coupable des médias, les assassinats de vrais journalistes honnêtes, l’extinction programmée des Cronkites et des Murrows, remplacés par des journalistes fades et carriéristes qui lisent un prompteur qui omet méticuleusement toute critique de l’État « juif ».
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC au nom de toutes les mères qui ont été obligées d’accoucher dans la douleur à des points de contrôle israéliens.
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC dont la crédibilité publique fond comme neige au soleil et s’écoule comme des barils de pétrole brut dans les crevasses de l’Enfer ! Glissez une Quenelle au nom du dégoût grandissant de la population, de l’antipathie et de la répugnance qui caractérise l’AIPAC et ses appels incessants à la guerre.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC au nom du manche à balai affublé d’un drapeau blanc, et de la femme qui le tenait bien en évidence et l’agitait pour que les soldats israéliens la voient, jusqu’à ce que le balai tombe au sol et que le drapeau blanc caresse la poussière de Gaza, teinté de pourpre par le sang de ses deux petites-filles.
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC au nom des soldats américains morts parce que leurs corps ont été déchiquetés pour de fausses raisons, par hypocrisie et pour des prétextes fallacieux. Glissez une Quenelle au nom du demi-million d’enfants irakiens dont la mort « valait le coup », au nom des mensonges sur l’uranium militaire, et au nom des armes de destruction massive que les inspecteurs n’ont jamais trouvées.
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC au nom des visages de prisonniers encagoulés dont les parties génitales ont été électrocutées, au nom des millions d’Irakiens tués ou déplacés, de la perte de fierté d’une nation entière touchée par la famine, brisée et renvoyée au Moyen-Âge, et au nom des rides autour des yeux des cadavres et de l’absence d’humanité et de vertu de ceux qui ont commandité leur massacre.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Glissez une Quenelle au baratin des armes de destruction massive, aux dictateurs qui tuent leur propre peuple et à toutes les « solutions » mises sur la table des négociations. Glissez une Quenelle aux mythomanes malfaiteurs qui ont contribué à propager un flot débordant de faux témoignages, qui ont largué des bombes lors de mariages et amputé les mariés, les enfants et les jeunes tourtereaux… Ils sont rarement apparus devant les caméras, mais ils ont exprimé leurs regrets par la suite.
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC pour leur tromperie, leur hypocrisie et leur non-respect des résolutions de l’ONU, pour la politique de la soi-disant « ambiguïté nucléaire » qui a permis à un État voyou, corrompu et ségrégationniste, de s’en tirer pendant plus de trois décennies sans avoir à rendre de comptes. Glissez une Quenelle aux comportements répréhensibles des gouvernements qui détournent le regard alors que des innocents sont massacrés, glissez-leur par amour envers ceux qui se dressent face à la haine, aux grenades lacrymogènes, aux contusions qui leur ont été infligées sur le crâne, et contre l’obscurité qui assombrit ce monde.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Glissez une Quenelle à ce nid de vipères, à ceux qui soufflent dans la trompette de la folie, aux mouchards qui nous ont imposé le Patriot Act, à ce nids de vipères aveugles qui induisent d’autres vipères aveugles à s’isoler, à se délégitimer et à s’autodétruire dans une explosion de pure démence.
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC pour les $18 000 000 000 000 de dettes dépensés pour un ensemble de guerres, de centre-villes dévastés, d’infrastructures qui vacillent, et pour le manque de soins de santés universels au moment-même où le s1 % les plus riches de la population mondiale se pavanent en limousines plaquées or. Glissez une Quenelle aux politiciens qui nous ont mis dans cette situation déplorable, mais qui ne cessent de vouer leur soutien éternel et indéfectible à Israël.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC pour le manque de courage de certains, pour les insultes, les intimidations, les accusations d’antisémitisme, les carrières fichues en l’air, et glissez une Quenelle au nom de personnes commeHelen Thomas, qui ont osé aller à contre-courant, qui se sont élevées et ont dit la vérité aux masses endormies qui baissent le regard et se vautrent dans une automutilation éternelle injustifiée.
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC et aux imbéciles adeptes de la diarrhée verbale qui confisquent la liberté de pensée dans les universités qu’ils dirigent, détruisent le savoir et brisent les vitres des voitures des personnes qui exercent leur liberté d’expression, tout cela au nom d’un certain groupe d’individus, afin que ces derniers puissent continuer à voler, à piller et à exterminer lentement mais sûrement un autre peuple.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC pour les os brisés et la chair déchiquetée par les balles en acier recouvertes de caoutchouc, pour les larmes, mêlées à la poussière, des personnes expropriées de leurs maisons.
Glissez une Quenelle à l’obscurité de l’esprit humain qui peut concevoir qu’un Dieu ait ordonné un génocide, qui considère les enfants innocents de Palestine comme des « Amalécites » et ordonne leur destruction et leur annihilation totale.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Et Glissez une Quenelle au nom de tous les rêves perdus, des futurs volés, des étudiants endettés toujours plus nombreux qui vivent dans la pauvreté alors que des milliards continuent à affluer pour Israël, un parasite qui semble ne pas pouvoir être arraché, éliminé avec des antibiotiques ou des antiviraux, et contre lequel aucun antidote ne semble fonctionner.
Voguons ensemble vers ce temps perdu,
Au milieu des eaux troubles et brumeuses,
Les vagues imprévisibles nous encerclent,
Le bateau dérive soudain sur une liste mal définie
Espoir, optimisme, promesse, accomplissement,
Chavirent sous les balles sournoises,
Le deuil perplexe du librettiste au long cou,
Reste gravé dans notre passé et dans notre futur.
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC
Glissez une Quenelle à ceux qui n’aiment rien ni personne
Glissez une Quenelle au nom des anges à qui on a brisé les ailes
Glissez une Quenelle à l’AIPAC
Article rédigé par Richard Edmonson de VeteransToday
Dix excellentes raisons de glisser une Quenelle :
1. Ça fait chier les sionistes (qui sont les véritables antisémites). Un doigt d’honneur grandeur nature !
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
2. C’est un geste respectable !
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
3. On l’enseigne facilement aux enfants !
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
4. C’est politiquement incorrect, et ça envoie un message
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
5. Elle vous permet de remporter un prix !
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
6. C’est à la mode dans beaucoup d’universités ! [NdQ+ : en fait, c’était à la Cour d’appel de Paris]
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
7. C’est un geste de pros qui respecte la déontologie !
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
8. Avant de se rendre aux États-Unis pour vomir sa haine au congrès, Netanyahou se serait arrêté pour prier au mur des Lamentations…
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Avec un peu de chance, il aura croisé ce grand Monsieur !
Les gendarmes se préparent à encadrer une marche en soutien à Dieudonné.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
L’humoriste préféré des Français, Dieudonné M’bala M’bala, a été arrêté mercredi et accusé d’apologie de l’humour.
Après avoir arrêté le comique français mercredi à son domicile de Quenelle-Sur-Seine, les autorités françaises ont annoncé que quiconque rirait des sketchs de Dieudonné, sur YouTube, Facebook, Twitter ou ailleurs, serait également arrêté et accusé d’apologie de l’humour. « Et si vous pensez que c’est drôle, petits malins, nous vous arrêterons pour apologie de l’humour. Alors ne faites rien de drôle », a déclaré le commissaire de police Jerque Culfoutre.
Après avoir placé Dieudonné en isolement dans une cellule à l’épreuve de l’humour, la police française a annulé sa tournée, qui affichait complet dans plusieurs zénith, dans le cadre du combat pour la liberté d’expression suite aux attentats contre Charlie Hebdo.
Si nous laissons Dieudonné faire des blagues, et si nous laissons les gens rire, c’en est fini de la liberté d’expression en France !
Le président français, François Hollande, s’est exprimé sur la différence essentielle qui existe entre la liberté d’expression de type Charlie Hebdo, qui doit être protégée par des dizaines de milliers d’agents de police et de soldats de l’armée, et Dieudonné, qui doit être interdit et emprisonné :
Charlie Hebdo, c’est un humour stupide et odieux mais anodin, tandis que Dieudonné est dangereusement hilarant. Si on permet à Dieudonné de s’exprimer, des émeutes du rire se produiront inévitablement, et des personnes innocentes pourraient même mourir de rire. Nous avons une expression, ici en France, « mort de rire » (MDR), qui résume assez bien la menace que représente Dieudonné.[…] Certains membres du public de Dieudonné ont en effet imploré le comique de cesser ses sketchs en rafale : « Arrête, tu nous tues ! ». Mais Dieudonné continue à mitrailler des blagues, et trouble de fait l’ordre public. […] Charlie Hebdo ne représente aucunement une menace. Selon des recherches méticuleuses menées par les services de renseignement, la dernière fois qu’une personne a ri des vignettes de Charlie Hebdo remonte au printemps 1972, et cet incident serait dû à une consommation de marijuana du lecteur, et non à la lecture de l’hebdomadaire en soi.
Hollande a confié aux journalistes que le sarcasme tranchant et aiguisé de Dieudonné est une arme dangereuse capable de faire couler davantage de sang qu’un tir d’AK-47 dans la tête à bout portant. Le président français a également affirmé que Dieudonné provoque de puissantes explosions de rire qui peuvent transformer le public sans défense en gelée frémissante, faire trembler le théâtre jusqu’à ses murs porteurs et même risquer de « casser la baraque ».
Dans des tentatives de contrevenir à l’interdiction du rire des sketchs de Dieudonné sur YouTube, certains fans ont été jusqu’à glousser, s’esclaffer, caqueter, pouffer, hurler, grogner et même se tenir les côtes.
Les fans de Dieudonné ont également prévu d’organiser une marche « Je Suis Dieudonné » afin de soutenir le comique emprisonné. Un responsable français, le ministre des Démarches ridicules, Alex Craiment, a tenu à dire à ces organisateurs de la marche Je Suis Dieudonné :
Je vous concède le droit de défiler autant que vous le voudrez. Mais à une seule condition : votre visage doit rester de marbre !
Craimant a déclaré que les manifestants désireux de soutenir Dieudonné seront encadrés par des centaines de milliers de policiers et de soldats, ainsi que par des unités d’élite antiterroriste, des hélicoptères, des drones, des lance-roquettes et des missiles tactiques nucléaires, tous prêts à intervenir en faisant usage d’une force hors du commun si quelque manifestant que ce soit osait esquisser un sourire.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.Article rédigé par Dr. Kevin Barrett, du site VeteransToday. Docteur en philosophie arabe et islamique, il est l’un des plus célèbres critiques de la Guerre contre la Terreur. Il a été invité sur les plateaux de Fox, CNN, PBS et autres médias, et publié dans le New York Times, le Christian Science Monitor, le Chicago Tribune et d’autres journaux de premier ordre. Il a enseigné dans des lycées et des universités à San Francisco, à Paris, et dans le Wisconsin, où il a tenu une conférence en 2008. Il travaille actuellement en tant qu’organisateur d’ASBL, auteur et animateur radio.
(FinalCall.com) - The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan revealed details of a meeting with Jewish leaders who demanded that he denounce the book, "The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews". For the complete video of the July 11, 2010 speech, go: http://store.finalcall.com/. For information about the book, "The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews" go: http://www.BlacksAndJews.com
''The Secret Relationship Between Blacks And Jews Vol. 2
This Plenary session with members of the Nation of Islam research team deals with the Nation of Islam's monumental new books, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks And Jews Vol. 2 and Jews Selling Blacks. This workshop was held over the Saviours Day weekend on February 26, 2011.
"There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance." -- Goethe
"The search for truth is never wrong. The only sin is to lack the courage to follow where truth leads." -- Duke
"He alone deserves to be remembered by his children who treasures up and preserves the memory of his fathers." -- Edmund Burke
SLAVERY
World and American History
Slavery. Just mention the word and most black people will have some opinion, mostly negative, about Colonial America, White Americans, and black treatment by Whites.
We are not about to defend the practice of slavery in the United States of America
What we are going to do is give historical background
Facts that you may not be aware of, and other important information.
It's also important to understand that
White people suffered from slavery
As a matter of fact
Four months before the first blacks landed on American shores Great Britain shipped the first 100 slaves to Jamestown -- they were White children
with many more to follow
When the first 20 Africans arrived they were unintended and they were bartered for food and provisions
This did not start slavery in America
Slavery had already been established with Whites!
No flood of Africans followed these first blacks
There was no market for them in Virginia
Six years later there were still only
Twenty-three Africans in the colony
Does this sound like a major slave trade?
Even decades later there were only a few hundred Africans.
Of course, this would change. But for decades, the poor of England, the riff-raff of England, the prisoners of England, Scotland and Ireland
These were the slaves of America
See the extraordinary book "White Cargo: The Forgotten History of Britain's White Slaves in America" by Don Jordan and Michael Walsh for more information on how the rich elite enslaved their own countrymen for profit and personal gain
Color didn't matter -- Just money
The Irish were considered
"Niggers turned inside out"
"Negro slavery was efficiently established in colonial America because Black slaves were governed, organized and controlled by the structures and organization that were first used to enslave and control Whites. Black slaves were 'late comers fitted into a system already developed.'" (Michael Hoffman, They Were White and They Were Slaves and Ulrich B. Phillips, Life and Labor in the Old South, pp. 25, 26)
Historian Oscar Handlin writes that in colonial America, White "servants (SLAVES) could be bartered for profit, sold to the highest bidder for the unpaid debts of their masters, and otherwise transferred like movable goods or chattels...The condition of the first Negroes in the continental English colonies must be viewed within the perspective of these conceptions and realities of White servitude." (Michael A Hoffman, They Were White and They Were Slaves, p. 39)
Why don't you know about White slavery?
Why haven't you been taught this aspect of your history and Heritage in school?
Ask a different question: who benefits from racial unrest?
Notice this advertisement includes negro, Indian and a "fresh complexion servant" who has run away
All slaves
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
The politically correct media and educational system would have you believe that the evil White man enslaved only the negro and only Whites have responsibility for slavery.
This same establishment would also have you believe that
Only negroes were the victims of slavery and only Whites owned slaves
The truth is that by around 1626
White slaves outnumbered blacks in the Chesapeake by more than
Twenty to one
And even by 1700 the ration was still three to one
6000 White slaves
2000 black slaves
The gap was closing fast, but Whites were still enslaved in greater numbers then blacks.
The Forgotten Slaves: Whites in Servitude in Early America and Industrial Britain
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
White children enslaved in a mine in 19th century England. The two on the left are virtually naked. Children of both sexes worked in this manner.
Two years ago, Prime Minister Paul Keating of Australia refused to show "proper respect" to Britain's Queen Elizabeth II during her state visit. In response, Terry Dicks, a Conservative member of the British Parliament said, "It's a country of ex-convicts, so we should not be surprised by the rudeness of their prime minister." A slur such as this would be considered unthinkable if it were uttered against any other class or race of people except the descendants of White slavery. Dicks' remark is not only offensive, it is ignorant and false. Most of Australia's "convicts" were shipped into servitude for such "crimes" as stealing seven yards of lace, cutting trees on an aristocrat's estate or poaching sheep to feed a starving family. The arrogant disregard for the holocaust visited upon the poor and working class Whites of Britain by the aristocracy continues in our time because the history of that epoch has been almost completely extirpated from our collective memory. When White servitude is acknowledged as having existed in America, it is almost always termed as temporary "indentured servitude" or part of the convict trade, which, after the Revolution of 1776, centered on Australia instead of America. The "convicts" transported to America under the 1723 Waltham Act, perhaps numbered 100,000. The indentured servants who served a tidy little period of 4 to 7 years polishing the master's silver and china and then taking their place in colonial high society, were a minuscule fraction of the great unsung hundreds of thousands of White slaves who were worked to death in this country from the early l7th century onward.
Up to one-half of all the arrivals in the American colonies were Whites slaves and they were America's first slaves. These Whites were slaves for life, long before Blacks ever were. This slavery was even hereditary. White children born to White slaves were enslaved too.
Whites were auctioned on the block with children sold and separated from their parents and wives sold and separated from their husbands. Free Black property owners strutted the streets of northern and southern American cities while White slaves were worked to death in the sugar mills of Barbados and Jamaica and the plantations of Virginia. The Establishment has created the misnomer of "indentured servitude" to explain away and minimize the fact of White slavery. But bound Whites in early America called themselves slaves. Nine-tenths of the White slavery in America was conducted without indentures of any kind but according to the so-called "custom of the country," as it was known, which was lifetime slavery administered by the White slave merchants themselves. In George Sandys laws for Virginia, Whites were enslaved "forever." The service of Whites bound to Berkeley's Hundred was deemed "perpetual." These accounts have been policed out of the much touted "standard reference works" such as Abbott Emerson Smith's laughable whitewash, Colonists in Bondage. I challenge any researcher to study 17th century colonial America, sifting the documents, the jargon and the statutes on both sides of the Atlantic and one will discover that White slavery was a far more extensive operation than Black enslavement. It is when we come to the 18th century that one begins to encounter more "servitude" on the basis of a contract of indenture. But even in that period there was kidnapping of Anglo-Saxons into slavery as well as convict slavery. In 1855, Frederic Law Olmsted, the landscape architect who designed New York's Central Park, was in Alabama on a pleasure trip and saw bales of cotton being thrown from a considerable height into a cargo ship's hold. The men tossing the bales somewhat recklessly into the hold were Negroes, the men in the hold were Irish. Olmsted inquired about this to a shipworker. "Oh," said the worker, "the niggers are worth too much to be risked here; if the Paddies are knocked overboard or get their backs broke, nobody loses anything." Before British slavers traveled to Africa's western coast to buy Black slaves from African chieftains, they sold their own White working class kindred ("the surplus poor" as they were known) from the streets and towns of England, into slavery. Tens of thousands of these White slaves were kidnapped children. In fact the very origin of the word kidnapped is kid-nabbed, the stealing of White children for enslavement. According to the English Dictionary of the Underworld, under the heading kidnapper is the following definition: "A stealer of human beings, esp. of children; originally for exportation to the plantations of North America." The center of the trade in child-slaves was in the port cities of Britain and Scotland: "Press gangs in the hire of local merchants roamed the streets, seizing 'by force such boys as seemed proper subjects for the slave trade.' Children were driven in flocks through the town and confined for shipment in barns...So flagrant was the practice that people in the countryside about Aberdeen avoided bringing children into the city for fear they might be stolen; and so widespread was the collusion of merchants, shippers, suppliers and even magistrates that the man who exposed it was forced to recant and run out of town." (Van der Zee, Bound Over, p. 210). White slaves transported to the colonies suffered a staggering loss of life in the 17th and 18th century. During the voyage to America it was customary to keep the White slaves below deck for the entire nine to twelve week journey. A White slave would be confined to a hole not more than sixteen feet long, chained with 50 other men to a board, with padlocked collars around their necks. The weeks of confinement below deck in the ship's stifling hold often resulted in outbreaks of contagious disease which would sweep through the "cargo" of White "freight" chained in the bowels of the ship. Ships carrying White slaves to America often lost half their slaves to death. According to historian Sharon V. Salinger, "Scattered data reveal that the mortality for [White] servants at certain times equaled that for [Black] slaves in the 'middle passage,' and during other periods actually exceeded the death rate for [Black] slaves." Salinger reports a death rate of ten to twenty percent over the entire 18th century for Black slaves on board ships enroute to America compared with a death rate of 25% for White slaves enroute to America. Foster R. Dulles writing in Labor in America: A History, states that whether convicts, children 'spirited' from the countryside or political prisoners, White slaves "experienced discomforts and sufferings on their voyage across the Atlantic that paralleled the cruel hardships undergone by negro slaves on the notorious Middle Passage." Dulles says the Whites were "indiscriminately herded aboard the 'white guineamen,' often as many as 300 passengers on little vessels of not more than 200 tons burden--overcrowded, unsanitary...The mortality rate was sometimes as high as 50% and young children seldom survived the horrors of a voyage which might last anywhere from seven to twelve weeks." Independent investigator A.B. Ellis in the Argosy writes concerning the transport of White slaves, "The human cargo, many of whom were still tormented by unhealed wounds, could not all lie down at once without lying on each other. They were never suffered to go on deck. The hatchway was constantly watched by sentinels armed with hangers and blunder busses. In the dungeons below all was darkness, stench, lamentation, disease and death." Marcus Jernegan describes the greed of the shipmasters which led to horrendous loss of life for White slaves transported to America: "The voyage over often repeated the horrors of the famous 'middle passage' of slavery fame. An average cargo was three hundred, but the shipmaster, for greater profit, would sometimes crowd as many as six hundred into a small vessel...The mortality under such circumstances was tremendous, sometimes more than half...Mittelberger (an eyewitness) says he saw thirty-two children thrown into the ocean during one voyage." "The mercantile firms, as importers of (White) servants, were not too careful about their treatment, as the more important purpose of the transaction was to get ships over to South Carolina which could carry local produce back to Europe. Consequently the Irish--as well as others--suffered greatly... "It was almost as if the British merchants had redirected their vessels from the African coast to the Irish coast, with the white servants coming over in much the same fashion as the African slaves." (Warren B. Smith, White Servitude in Colonial South Carolina). A study of the middle passage of White slaves was included in a Parliamentary Petition of 1659. It reported that White slaves were locked below deck for two weeks while the slaveship was still in port. Once under way, they were "all the way locked up under decks...amongst horses." They were chained from their legs to their necks. Those academics who insist that slavery is an exclusively Black racial condition forget or deliberately omit the fact that the word slave originally was a reference to Whites of East European origin - "Slavs." Moreover, in the 18th century in Britain and America, the Industrial Revolution spawned the factory system whose first laborers were miserably oppressed White children as young as six years of age. They were locked in the factories for sixteen hours a day and mangled by the primitive machinery. Hands and arms were regularly ripped to pieces. Little girls often had their hair caught in the machinery and were scalped from their foreheads to the back of their necks. White Children wounded and crippled in the factories were turned out without compensation of any kind and left to die of their injuries. Children late to work or who fell asleep were beaten with iron bars. Lest we imagine these horrors were limited to only the early years of the Industrial Revolution, eight and ten year old White children throughout America were hard at work in miserable factories and mines as late as 1920. Because of the rank prostitution, stupidity and cowardice of America's teachers and educational system, White youth are taught that Black slaves, Mexican peons and Chinese coolies built this country while the vast majority of the Whites lorded it over them with a lash in one hand and a mint julep in the other. The documentary record tells a very different story, however. When White Congressman David Wilmot authored the Wilmot Proviso to keep Black slaves out of the American West he did so, he said, to preserve that vast expanse of territory for "the sons of toil, my own race and color." This is precisely what most White people in America were, "sons of toil," performing backbreaking labor such as few of us today can envision. They had no paternalistic welfare system; no Freedman's Bureau to coo sweet platitudes to them; no army of bleeding hearts to worry over their hardships. These Whites were the expendable frontline soldiers in the expansion of the American frontier. They won the country, felled the trees, cleared and planted the land. The wealthy, educated White elite in America are the sick heirs of what Charles Dickens in Bleak House termed "telescopic philanthropy"--the concern for the condition of distant peoples while the plight of kindred in one's own backyard are ignored. Today much of what we see on "Turner Television" and Pat Robertson's misnamed "Family Channel," are TV films depicting Blacks in chains, Blacks being whipped, Blacks oppressed. Nowhere can we find a cinematic chronicle of the Whites who were beaten and killed in White slavery. Four-fifths of the White slaves sent to Britain's sugar colonies in the West Indies did not survive their first year. Soldiers in the American Revolution and sailors impressed into the American navy received upwards of two hundred whiplashes for minor infractions. But no TV show lifts the shirt of these White yeoman to reveal the scars on their backs. The Establishment would rather weep over the poor persecuted Negroes, but leave the White working class "rednecks" and "crackers" (both of these terms of derision were first applied to White slaves), to live next door to the Blacks. Little has changed since the early 1800s when the men of property and station of the English Parliament outlawed Black slavery throughout the Empire. While this Parliament was in session to enact this law, ragged five year old White orphan boys, beaten, starved and whipped, were being forced up the chimneys of the English parliament, to clean them. Sometimes the chimney masonry collapsed on these boys. Other times they suffocated to death inside their narrow smoke channels. Long after Blacks were free throughout the British Empire, the British House of Lords refused to abolish chimney-sweeping by White children under the age of ten. The Lords contended that to do so would interfere with "property rights." The lives of the White children were not worth a farthing and were considered no subject for humanitarian concern. The chronicle of White slavery in America comprises the dustiest shelf in the darkest corner of suppressed American history. Should the truth about that epoch ever emerge into the public consciousness of Americans, the whole basis for the swindle of "Affirmative action,""minority set-asides" and proposed "Reparations to African-Americans" will be swept away. The fact is, the White working people of this country owe no one. They are themselves the descendants, as Congressman Wilmot so aptly said, of "the sons of toil." There will only be racial peace when knowledge of radical historical truths are widespread and both sides negotiate from positions of strength and not from fantasies of White working class guilt and the uniqueness of Black suffering. Let it be said, in many cases Blacks in slavery had it better than poor Whites in the antebellum South. This is why there was such strong resistance to the Confederacy in the poverty-stricken areas of the mountain south, such as Winston County in Alabama and the Beech mountains of North Carolina. Those poor Whites could not imagine why any White laborer would want to die for the slave-owning plutocracy that more often than not, gave better care and attention to their Black servants than they did to the free white labor they scorned as "trash." To this day, the White ruling class denigrates the White poor and patronizes Blacks. If this seems admirable from the pathological viewpoint of Marxism or cosmopolitan liberalism, the Black and Third World "beneficiaries" of White ruling class "esteem" ought to consider what sort of "friends" they actually have. The Bible declares that the man who does not take care of his own family is "worse than an infidel." This also applies to one's racial kindred. The man who neglects his own children to care for yours has true love for neither. White, self-hating liberals and greed-head conservatives who claim to care for the "civil rights" of Black and Third World people, discard the working class of their own people on the garbage heap of history. When they are finished with their own they shall surely turn on others. Those who care for their own kind first are not practicing "hate" but kindness, which is the very root of the word.
Michael A. Hoffman II is the author of "They Were White and They Were Slaves: The Untold History of the Enslavement of Whites in Early America and Industrial Britain"
to order a copy of this book click on the link below
Slavery is the systematic exploitation of labor. Slavery is a legal or informal institution under which a person (called "a slave") is compelled to work for another (sometimes called "the master" or "slave owner"). Evidence of slavery predates written records, and has existed to varying extents, forms and periods in almost all cultures and countries. Slaves are held against their will from the time of their capture, purchase, or birth, and are deprived of the right to leave, to refuse to work, or to receive compensation in return for their labor. Today, slavery is formally outlawed in nearly all countries, but the continues to exist in various forms around the world. Prior to the 10th century, words other than "slave" were used for all kinds of unfree laborers. For instance, the old Latin word servus was used for both serfs and chattel slaves. In Modern English, the word slave originates from "sclave" around 1290. It's based on the Byzantine Greek "sklabos" meaning Slavic people". The term originally referred to various peoples from Eastern and Central Europe since many Slavic and other people from these areas were captured and sold as slaves by the Vikings and later the Holy Roman Emperor Otto I. The enslavement of so many White Christian people is where the word slave originated.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
The Slave Market is a painting by 19th century artist Gustave Boulanger. It depicts a Roman slave auction and appears to be intended to show the horrific aspects of human beings being for sale. It shows the marketing of seven young people, ranging in age from children to young adults, as slaves. Both male slaves, as well as two of the female slaves, bear a similarity in appearance, perhaps suggesting that they are members of a family forced into slavery by economic conditions. All are wearing tags to indicate their availability as slaves. The auctioneer adds to the sense of horror with his very casual attitude.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
13th Century slave market in Yemen
Slavery traces back to the earliest records, such as the Code of Hammurabi around 1760 BC, which refers to it as an established institution. Slavery in ancient cultures was known to occur in civilizations as old as Sumer and is found in every civilization including ancient Egypt, Assyria, Ancient Greece, Ancient Persia, Rome and the Islamic Caliphate. Slavery is mentioned in the Bible.As the Roman Republic expanded outward, entire populations were enslaved, thus creating an ample supply. The Romans enslaved Greeks, Berbers, Germans, Britons, Thracians, Gauls (Celts), Jews, Arabs and many more not only for labor but for their amusement (e.g. gladiators and sex slaves). This oppression by an elite minority eventually led to slave revolts, the most famous led by Spartacus. Most of these populations were White, the majority Christian. The early medieval slave trade was mainly to the East: the Byzantine Empire and the Muslim World were the destinations, pagan Central and Eastern Europe, along with the Caucasus and Tartary, were important sources. Viking, Arab, Greek and Jewish merchants (known as Radhanites) were all involved in the slave trade during the Early Middle Ages. During the constant warfare between Muslims and Christians in Medieval Spain and Portugal, Muslim raiding parties took Christian slaves by the thousands, mainly women and children.
Over 10% of England's population entered in the Domesday Book in 1086 were slaves. This would be White, English slaves.
Copy of a page from the Domesday Book for Warwickshire
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. The great survey of England completed in 1086 for William I
The Byzantine-Ottoman wars and the Ottoman wars in Europe brought large numbers of Christian slaves into the Islamic world. After one battle 12,000 Christian slaves were freed from the Ottoman Turks. Christians also sold Muslim slaves captured in war. Slavery was prominent in Africa long before the beginnings of the transatlantic slave trade. The maritime town of Lagos, Portugal was created for the sale of imported African slaves 1444. In 1441, the first slaves were brought to Portugal from northern Mauritania. By the year 1552 black African slaves made up 10 percent of the population of Lisbon. The first Europeans to use African slaves in the New World were the Spaniards. They used them on islands such as Cuba and Hispaniola, where the native populations had been decimated by smallpox. The first African slaves arrived in 1501. According to Sir Henry Bartle Frere there were an estimated 8 million or 9 million slaves in India in 1841. In Malabar about 15% of the population were slaves. Slavery was abolished in both Hindu and Muslim India by the Indian Slavery Act V. of 1843. The Imperial government formally abolished slavery in China in 1906, and the law became effective in 1910. Indigenous slaves existed in Korea. Slavery was officially abolished with the Gabo Reform of 1894 but remained extant in reality until 1930. During the Joseon Dynasty (1392–1910) about 30% to 50% of the Korean population were slaves. Historians say the Arab slave trade lasted more than millennium. Some historians estimate that between 11 and 18 million black African slaves crossed the Red Sea, Indian Ocean, and Sahara Desert from 650 AD to 1900 AD, or more than the 9.4 to 12 million Africans brought to the Americas. According to Robert Davis between 1 million and 1.25 million Europeans were captured by Barbara pirates and sold as slaves in North Africa and Ottoman Empire between the 16th and 19th centuries.
On December 10, 1948, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article 4 states:
No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.
That hasn't stopped slavery
Although outlawed in nearly all countries, forms of slavery still exist in many parts of the world. According to Kevin Bales of Free the Slaves (FTS), an advocacy group linked with Anti-Slavery International, there were 27 million people (although some put the number as high as 200 million) who worked in virtual slavery in 2007, spread all over the world. According to FTS, these slaves represent the largest number of people that has ever been in slavery at any point in world history and the smallest percentage of the total human population that has ever been enslaved at once.FTS claims that present-day slaves have been sold for $40 in Mali for young adult male workers and as much as $1,000 in Thailand for HIV-free females able to work in brothels. The lower limit represents the lowest price that there has ever been for a slave: the price of a comparable male slave in 1850 in the United States would have been about $25,800 in present-day terms (US$1,000 in 1850). That difference, even allowing for differences in purchasing power, is significant. As a result of the lower price, the economic advantages of present-day slavery are clear. Today (2008) Enslavement is also taking place in parts of Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia. The Middle East Quarterly reports that slavery is still endemic in Sudan. The Chinese government freed 570 people from brick manufacturers in June and July 2007. Among those rescued were 69 children. In response, the Chinese government assembled a force of 35,000 police to check northern Chinese brick kilns for slaves, sent dozens of kiln supervisors to prison, punished 95 officials in Shanxi province for dereliction of duty, and sentenced one kiln foreman to death for killing an enslaved worker. In Mauritania (northwest Africa) alone, it is estimated that up to 600,000 men, women and children, or 20% of the population, are enslaved, many of them used as bonded labor. Slavery in Mauritania was criminalized in August 2007. It should be interesting to note that it's the lighter skinned Muslim majority ("white Moors" or bidhan) that's enslaving the darker skinned descendants of black Africans abducted into slavery who now live in Mauritania as "black Moors" or haratin in Mauritania.
Three Abyssinian slaves in chains. Anti-Slavery Society estimated there were 2 million slaves in Ethiopia in the early 1930s, out of an estimated population of between 8 and 16 million.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Francis Bok
former Sudanese slave
In Niger slavery is also a current phenomenon. A Nigerian study has found that more than 800,000 people are enslaved, almost 8% of the population. Pygmies, the people of Central Africa's rain forest, live in servitude to the Bantus. Some tribal sheiks in Iraq still keep blacks, called Abd, which means servant or slave in Arabic, as slaves. Child slavery has commonly been used in the production of cash crops and mining. According to the U.S. Department of State, more than 109,000 children were working on cocoa farms alone in the Ivory Coast in 2002. In the Sudan more than 200,000 people, mostly Dinka, have been enslaved in recent years. In Myanmar an estimated 800,000 people are subject to forced labor.
Sexual Slavery
In Africa with institutional slavery "abolished" in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in most countries, other forms of slavery have become more widespread. Reports of women sex slaves in Sudan, Liberia, Sierra Leone, northern Uganda, Congo, Niger and Mauritania are common. In Ghana, Togo and Benin a form of religious prostitution known as trokosi (ritual servitude) forcibly keeps thousands of girls and women in traditional shrines as "wives of the gods", where priests perform the sexual function in place of the gods. In India as many as 200,000 Nepali girls, many under the age of 14, have been sold into sexual slavery. Nepalese women and girls are favored in India because of their fair skin and they look young. In Pakistan girls as young as nine years old have been sold by their families to brothels as sex slaves in big cities, often due to poverty or debt, but occasionally to pay for gambling, drinking or drug debt. Girls from Afghanistan have been tricked into coming to Pakistan and then used as sex slaves. Asia is rampant with crimes against women in the sex slave business. Tens of thousands of women and girls, some very young, are forced into the sex business in countries such as Vietnam, Cambodia, Burma, China, and others. Thailand is a big offender in this disgusting business. Japan recently apologized for forcing women to be used as sex slaves during World War II. Israel has smuggled between 3,000 and 5,000 women over the past four years in a burgeoning, illegal sex industry, according to a parliamentary committee report issued in 2005. The women are smuggled across the Egyptian border into Israel and, according to Zehava Galon who heads the Committee Against Trade in Women, these women are "raped, beaten, and then sold in public auctions." Most of the women are from the former Soviet Union, she said. In other words, White. The United States has rescued Asian and Mexican women from being held captive as used as sex slaves.
These are just some of the known cases of modern day slavery
Human trafficking
Trafficking in human beings (also called human trafficking) is sometimes referred to as a form of slavery. The opponents of the practice point out that victims are tricked, lured by false promises, or forced into a "debt slavery" situation by the use against them of coercion, deception, fraud, intimidation, isolation, threat and use of physical force, debt bondage or even force-feeding with drugs of abuse to control their victims. While the majority of victims are women, and sometimes children, who are forced into prostitution (in which case the practice is called sex trafficking), victims also include men, women and children who are forced into manual labor. Due to the illegal nature of human trafficking, its exact extent is unknown. A US Government report published in 2005, estimates that 600,000-800,000 people worldwide are trafficked across borders each year (10,000 to 20,000 into the United States). This figure does not include those who are trafficked internally. This number is probably very low.
As you can see, slavery has its victims in all races, male and female, young and old
Stalin and Forced Labor
Even though Stalin's gulags weren't technically slavery we feel compelled to mention the Communist forced prison labor camps.
There were at least 476 separate camps, some of them comprising hundreds, even thousands of camp units. The most infamous complexes were those at arctic or subarctic regions. Started in 1918 after the Communist takeover of Russia, more than 14 million people passed through the Gulag from 1929 to 1953, with a further 6 to 7 million being deported and exiled to remote areas of the Soviet Union. According to de-classified archive data released by the successor agency to the KGB after Perestroika, a total of 1,053,829 people died in the GULAG from 1934 to 1953, not counting those who died in labor colonies. The total population of the camps varied from 510,307 (in 1934) to 1,727,970 (in 1953). Notice they haven't released earlier numbers.
Some estimates are that at least 20,000,000 -- that's twenty million people died in the Soviet Gulags
A Large majority of them White Christians
Most Gulag inmates were not political prisoners, although the political prisoner population was always significant. People could be imprisoned in a Gulag camp for crimes such as unexcused absences from work, petty theft, or anti-government jokes. About half of the political prisoners were sent to Gulag prison camps without trial. Per official data, there were more than 2.6 million imprisonment sentences in cases investigated by the secret police, 1921-1953. While the Gulag was radically reduced in size following Stalin's death in 1953, forced labor camps and political prisoners continued to exist in the Soviet Union right up to the Gorbachev era. However, the camps in Siberia still house a labor force of about a million prisoners.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
History of Slavery in America
First Legal Slave Owned by a Negro!
In 1619 the Dutch ship, the White Lion, damaged by battle with a Spanish ship and by a great storm, came ashore at Old Point Comfort with 20 captured enslaved Africans that they had taken from the Spanish. The Dutch were in need of repairs and supplies and the colonists were in need of able-bodied workers. So the Africans were traded for food and services. One could argue that being traded to the Jamestown colonists freed these 20 Africans. If they had continued with the Dutch they most certainly would have spent their lives in slavery. Instead, they became indentured servants and earned their freedom after a period of time. These 20 became "servants" and went to work in tobacco fields alongside the White servants from England. Conditions were hard for both groups but their servitude eventually would end.
In addition to Africans, Irish, Scottish, English and Germans were brought over in substantial numbers as slaves. Over half of all white immigrants to the English colonies consisted of these slaves, which historians want to call "indentured servants," during the 17th and 18th centuries. Most of the Whites were slaves. Only a handful were actually true indentured servants. At first, the Africans in Virginia were treated just the same as the European indentured servants. The Africans were freed after a stated period and given the use of land and supplies by their former owners. One African, Anthony Johnson, arrived in Jamestown in 1621, fulfilled his obligation of servitude, married and eventually became a landowner.
The transformation from indentured servitude to racial slavery for the Africans happened gradually since there were no laws regarding slavery early in Virginia's history. Yet in 1640 at least one black servant had been sentence to slavery. John Punch, an indentured servant, ran away. His sentence? A lifetime of slavery. The two White indentured servants who ran away with him are given extended terms of servitude.
The first legally-recognized slave in the area that was to become the United States was John Casor, a black man. A court in Northampton County, Virginia declared him property for life. Casor was "owned" by the Black colonist Anthony Johnson. Yes, the first legally owned slave in the American colonies was owned by a black man! What irony. But remember, Anthony Johnson came from Africa where slavery was common and expected. He only wanted to continue the practice of his homeland!
It's our opinion that, even though Mr. Johnson was the first to apply for a legal slave, it's obvious that the rest of society was quick to follow his actions. It's also our opinion that if white landowners didn't want the cheap labor that slavery provided there never would have been a market for this horrific practice. That's obvious. What isn't so obvious is that this is the start of the downfall of our nation. Just like ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome, when cheap labor becomes more important then doing the work yourself and maintaining your racial purity, your country will fall. The Africans suffered from White laziness. And ultimately, the White race, and America, has suffered.
In 1653 Virginia, one of Anthony Johnson’s involuntary African laborers, a man named John Casor, claimed his freedom because his term of indenture had allegedly expired seven years before. He fled his master’s plantation and took refuge with a nearby farmer, Captain Gouldsmith. Johnson insisted that his runaway laborer was not indentured, but was a lifelong slave and demanded the African’s return. Not wanting to become embroiled in a legal fight with a powerful plantation owner, Gouldsmith turned the worker over to another wealthy planter, Robert Parker. Parker took the worker’s side in the dispute, kept him on his own plantation’s workforce, and argued on his behalf in court. The case dragged on for two years, with Johnson at one point agreeing to manumit Casor, but then reneging on the settlement. On March 8, 1655, the Northampton County Court ruled that Casor had been a slave all along, ordered that the worker be returned immediately to Anthony Johnson, and ordered Robert Parker to pay damages for sheltering the runaway for two years, as well as court costs. A few years later, Parker abandoned his career as a Virginia planter and returned to England. Twenty years later, Casor was still owned by Mary Johnson—Anthony Johnson’s widow. What is important about this tale is that Anthony Johnson was also African. His plantation, from whence Casor fled, was named “Angola,” and it exploited European forced laborers as well as Africans.
Read the rest of this essay for a fascinating insight on early America and the question of color
The color-line was not what we have been taught to believe
The Virginia Slave Codes of 1705 made clear the status of slaves. During the British colonial period, every colony had slavery. Those in the north were primarily house servants and those in the South worked on farms and plantations. Subsistence farmers seldom owned slaves.
Interestingly, in 1670 the Lords Commissioners of Foreign Plantations enquired of the Governor of Virginia on the status of the colony. Sir William Berkeley answered in 1671.
15. What number of planters, servants and slaves; and how many parishes are there in your plantation? Answer. We suppose, and I am very sure we do not much miscount, that there is in Virginia above forty thousand persons, men, women, and children, and of which there are two thousand black slaves, six thousand Christian servants (slaves), for a short time, the rest are born in the country or have come in to settle and seat, in bettering their condition in a growing country. 16. What number of English, Scots, or Irish have for these seven yeares last past come yearly to plant and inhabite within your government; as also what blacks or slaves have been brought in within the said time? Answer. Yearly, we suppose there comes in, of servants, about fifteen hundred, of which, most are English, few Scotch, and fewer Irish, and not above two or three ships of negroes in seven years. 17. What number of people have yearly died, within your plantation and government for these seven years last past, both whites and blacks? Answer. All new plantations are, for an age or two, unhealthy, 'till they are thoroughly cleared of wood; but unless we have a particular register office, for the denoting of all that died, I cannot give a particular answer to this query, only this I can say, that there is not often unseasoned hands (as we term them) that die now, whereas heretofore not one of five escaped the first year.
Notice that there were more White "servants" than black slaves at that time
Slavery was not just black
Passage To America, 1750
At the end of the seventeenth century approximately 200,000 people inhabited the British colonies in North America. The following century saw an explosion in numbers with the population doubling about every 25 years. The majority of these new immigrants were Scotch-Irish, Germans or African slaves. Between 1700 and the beginning of the American Revolution, approximately 250,000 Africans, 210,000 Europeans and 50,000 convicts had reached the colonial shores. The passage to America was treacherous by any standard. Many of the immigrants were too poor to pay for the journey and therefore indentured themselves to wealthier colonialists - selling their services for a period of years in return for the price of the passage. Crammed into a small wooden ship, rolling and rocking at the mercy of the sea, the voyagers - men, women and children - endured hardships unimaginable to us today. Misery was the most common description of a journey that typically lasted seven weeks. Not An Easy Journey Gottleb Mittelberger was an organ master and schoolmaster who left one of the small German states in May 1750 to make his way to America. He arrived at the port of Philadelphia on October 10. He represents the thousands of Germans who settled in middle Pennsylvania during this period. He returned to his homeland in 1754. His diary was published in this country in 1898: ".during the voyage there is on board these ships terrible misery, stench, fumes, horror, vomiting, many kinds of seasickness, fever, dysentery, headache, heat, constipation, boils, scurvy, cancer, mouth rot, and the like, all of which come from old and sharply-salted food and meat, also from very bad and foul water, so that many die miserably. Add to this want of provisions, hunger, thirst, frost, heat, dampness, anxiety, want, afflictions and lamentations, together with other trouble, as e.g., the lice abound so frightfully, especially on sick people, that they can be scraped off the body. The misery reaches a climax when a gale rages for two or three nights and days, so that every one believes that the ship will go to the bottom with all human beings on board. In such a visitation the people cry and pray most piteously. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.No one can have an idea of the sufferings which women in confinement have to bear with their innocent children on board these ships. Few of this class escape with their lives; many a mother is cast into the water with her child as soon as she is dead. One day, just as we had a heavy gale, a woman in our ship, who was to give birth and could not give birth under the circumstances, was pushed through a loophole (porthole) in the ship and dropped into the sea, because she was far in the rear of the ship and could not be brought forward. Children from one to seven years rarely survive the voyage; and many a time parents are compelled to see their children miserably suffer and die from hunger, thirst, and sickness, and then to see them cast into the water. I witnessed such misery in no less than thirty-two children in our ship, all of whom were thrown into the sea. The parents grieve all the more since their children find no resting place in the earth, but are devoured by the monsters of the sea. It is a notable fact that children who have not yet had the measles or smallpox generally get them on board the ship, and mostly die of them. When the ships have landed at Philadelphia after their long voyage, no one is permitted to leave them except those who pay for their passage or can give good security; the others, who cannot pay, must remain on board the ships till they are purchased and are released from the ships by their purchasers. The sick always fare the worst, for the healthy are naturally preferred and purchased first; and so the sick and wretched must often remain on board in front of the city for two or three weeks, and frequently die, whereas many a one, if he could pay his debt and were permitted to leave the ship immediately, might recover and remain alive. The sale of human beings in the market on board the ship is carried on thus: Every day Englishmen, Dutchmen, and High German people come from the city of Philadelphia and other places, in part from a great distance, say twenty, thirty, or forty hours away, and go on board the newly-arrived ship that has brought and offers for sale passengers from Europe, and select among the healthy persons such as they deem suitable for their business, and bargain with them how long they will serve for their passage money, which most of them are still in debt for, When they have come to an agreement, it happens that adult persons bind themselves in writing to serve three, four, five, or six years for the amount due by them, according to their age and strength. But very young people, from ten to fifteen years, must serve till they are twenty-one years old. Many parents must sell and trade away their children like so many head of cattle, for if their children take the debt upon them- selves, the parents can leave the ship free and unrestrained; but as the parents often do not know where and to what people their children are going, it often happens that such parents and children, after leaving the ship, do not see each other again for many years, perhaps no more in all their lives. It often happens that whole families, husband, wife, and children, are separated by being sold to different purchasers, especially when they have not paid any part of their passage money. When a husband or wife has died at sea, when the ship has made more than half of her trip, the survivor must pay or serve not only for himself or herself, but also for the deceased. When both parents have died over halfway at sea, their children, especially when they are young and have nothing to pawn or to pay, must stand for their own and their parents' passage, and serve till they are twenty-one years old. When one has served his or her term, he or she is entitled to a new suit of clothes at parting; and if it has been so stipulated, a man gets in addition a horse, a woman, a cow." References: Mittelberger, Gottleb, Gottleb Mittelberger's Journey to Pennsylvania in the Year 1750 and Return to Germany in the year 1754 (published by the German Society of Pennsylvania 1898) How To Cite This Article: "Passage To America, 1750," EyeWitness to History, www.eyewitnesstohistory.com (2000).
If this doesn't put history in perspective for you, nothing will
Slavery was not just southern -- or White owned!
Bet this one may surprise you! Yes, slavery was also in the Northern states. From the University of Virginia Library has a historical census browser where you can get a variety of statistics relating to the census including slave statistics. One of these tables even lists slaves by state, county and the number of slaves that each county had in a particular census year (remember, the census was done every 10 years starting in 1790.)
Guess what, Connecticut had slaves in 1790! Every county. So did Delaware. As a matter of fact, Delaware had slaves in every county, every census, until slavery was abolished.
Alabama's first slave wasn't until the 1820 census! And then it wasn't even in every county. Georgia, of course, had some slaves in 1790 but certainly not every county, only a handful.
Illinois, land of Lincoln, had slaves! Yes, several counties in Illinois owned slaves up until the 1850 census and even a handful of counties in Indiana were slave owners.
We're well aware that Louisiana, Mississippi and the Carolinas were big slave owning states. But did you know that Maryland, except for Howard County, (until 1860) and one or two others owned slaves! That's right.
NewHampshire had a handful of slaves. Most counties in NewJersey were slave owning, New York and Pennsylvania until 1850 HAD SLAVES!
These northern states owned slaves before the southern states. The Northern States owned slaves starting from the 1790 census. Some Southern States started later, the Carolinas were by 1790, so was Virginia. Georgia and Tennessee had a handful by 1800, but others didn't start their slave ownership until the 1820 census.
So what does this prove? That slavery started in the industrial north. It was not a southern invention. The southern economy may have depended on slavery but the northern states benefited from slavery as well.
By 1860 on the eve of the War of Northern Aggression, most northern states had outlawed slavery. Yet interestingly, Maryland (87,189) Delaware (1,798) and NewJersey (18) still owned slaves. Nebraska, which was supposed to be a "free" state, had 15 and Kansas had 2. (Maryland was technically a border, slave owning state but remained part of the Union during the Civil War).
According to the 1860 Census 1.4% of Whites in the country (or 4.8% of southern Whites) owned one or more slaves.The majority owned between 1 and 5 slaves. The few individuals who owned 50 or more slaves were confined to the top one percent, and have been defined as slave magnates.
Back to the 1860 Census, there were almost 4.5 million blacks in the country, most of them in the south. Almost half a million of them were free. Of those, over 10,000 lived in New Orleans and over 3,000 of them owned slaves a whopping 28% of the free blacks of that city!
The 1860 Census also shows that at least six blacks in Louisiana owned more than 65 slaves, one, C. Richards and her son P.C. Richards, owned 152 slaves on a large sugar cane plantation. Another, Antoine Dubuclet, who was a sugar planter, had over 100 slaves and was valued, in 1860 dollars, at $264,000. That year the mean wealth of southern Whit men was $3,978.
In Charleston, South Carolina in 1860, 125 free blacks owned slaves, six of whom owned ten or more. In North Carolina 69 free blacks were slave owners.
Historians will say that black slave owners only owned their family or friends. The book "Black Slave Owners: Free Black Slave Masters in South Carolina, 1790-1860" proves this to be false. The author, a black man named Larry Koger, proves that blacks who owned slaves did so for two reasons. Some of them purchased their family members. And because of laws were unable to then free them and then "owned" their husbands, wives, or children for life. But a large majority of free black slave owners purchased their slaves for profit. These blacks were plantation owners and business owners, tailors, cooks, dress makers, etc. They needed slaves to make their business a success. In other words, just like the Whites of their day, the black slave owners took advantage of the practice of slavery in order to advance their business and make money. It was the economic system and they took advantage of it. These black slave owners separated families, sold unprofitable slaves and purchased their human property for profit. Just like the White man.
Notice that three of the four advertisements specifically advertise negroes
Is the fourth advertising White slaves?
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
1835 Ad from the East India Company in London
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
South Carolina Gazette, Charleston, 1760
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Richmond, Virginia, 1823
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Charleston, 1769
Slave Ship Owners
How did the slaves get here? Who owned the slave ships that brought the Africans to our country? Who profited from this horrific trafficking in human cargo?
The following table is a list of Ship's names, dates that they sailed and who owned them. This is just a fraction of the ships that entered the United States. But it gives an idea of who was profiting from this. TSRBBAJ = The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews.
Name
Date
Owner
Nationality
Captain
Number of slaves
Departure
Destination
Source
Abigail
?
Aaron Lopez, Moses Levy, Jacob Francks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.192)
Active
?
Aaron Lopez
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.192)
Africa
?
Jacob Rivera, Aaron Lopez
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.192)
Albany
?
Rodrigo Pacheco
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.192)
Amedee
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
QLAELONDLE t.2 (p,59)
Ann
1806
James DeWolf
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Ann
?
Aaron Lopez
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.192)
Anne & Eliza
?
Justus Bosh, John Abrams
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.192)
Antigua
?
Nathan Marston, Abram Lyell
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.192)
Barbados Factor
1743
Joseph Marks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Belle
1773
Moses, David Franks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Betsey
?
Samuel Jacobs
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Betsy
?
Jacob Rivera, Aaron Lopez
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.192)
Braman
1856 9 juin (saisie)
John Levi & Henriques da Costa
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Brooks
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
QLAELONDLE t.2 (p,21-22)
Butterfly
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
QLAELONDLE t.2 (p,62)
Caracoa
?
Moses & Sam Levy
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.192)
Charlotte
?
Moses & Sam Levy, Jacob Franks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.192)
Charlotte E. Tay
1860 24 avril (saisie)
Fred K. Myer
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Charming Betsey
1760
Samuel Levy
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Charming Polly
1751
Joseph Marks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Charming Sally
1743
Joseph Marks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Cleopatra
?
Jacob Rivera, Aaron Lopez
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.192)
Confirmation
1758
Naphtali, Isaac, Abraham Hart
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Crown
1717
Isaac Levy, Nathan Simson
Jewish
?
217 au total
Afrique
New York
TSRBBAJ (p.96)
David
1783
Abraham Gradis
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
De Vrijheid
?
David Senior, Jacob Senior
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.192)
Deborah
1771
Samson Levy
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Defiance
1758
Naphtali, Isaac, Abraham Hart
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Delaware
1773
Moses, David Franks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Diamond
1758
Naphtali, Isaac, Abraham Hart
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Dolphin
1748
Joseph Marks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Dolphin
1758
Naphtali, Isaac, Abraham Hart
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Drake
1743
Nathan Levy & David Franks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Dreadnought
?
Hayman Levy
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Duke of Cumberland
?
Judah Hays
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Duke of York
?
Jacob Franks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Eagle
?
Moses Seixas
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Elizabeth
?
Mordecai & David Gomez
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Fortunate
?
Aaron Lopez
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Four Sisters
?
Moses Levy
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
General Well
1758
Naphtali, Isaac, Abraham Hart
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
General Well
?
Moses Levy
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
George
?
Aaron Levy
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Gloucester
1772
Moses, David Franks & Isaac Levy
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Greyhound
1722 14 décembre (saisie)
Mardecai Gomez
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Greyhound
?
Jacob Rivera, Aaron Lopez (plus tard Moses Levy)
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Hannah
?
Jacob Rivera,
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Hannah
1746
Joseph Marks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Hester
?
Mordecai & David Gomez, Rodrigo Pacheco
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Hetty
?
Mordecai Sheftall
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Hiram
?
Moses Seixas
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Hope
?
Aaron Lopez, Myer Pollack
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Jane
1806
David G. Seixas
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Joseph & Rachel
1702
Moses, Joseph & Samuel Frazon
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Josephine
1860 28 mai (saisie)
Benjamin Isaacs
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Juf Gracia
?
Raphael Jesurun Sasportas
?
Raphael Jesurun Sasportas
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Juffr. Gerebrecht
?
Philippe Henriquez, David Senior & Co.
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
King George
?
Naphthali Hart
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
L Affriquaine
8 mars 1713
Compagnie du Sénégal
Française
Claude Gontard
500 dont 140 morts
Nantes
Cap
LSELEDN
L Amazone
23 octobre 1709
,,,,,,
Française
Julien Glemeau
500
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
L Aurore
6 janvier 1713
Mathurin Joubert et consorts
Française
Jacques Nadreau
266
Nantes
martinique Buenos-Ayres
LSELEDN
L Eclair
23 octobre 1709
Mathurin Joubert et consorts
Française
Joseph Joubert Demarais
confondue avec ceux du "le brillant"
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
L Eclair
29 Septembre 1712
Mathurin Joubert et consorts
Française
Jean Terrien
,,,,,,,,,,,
Nantes
Petit Goave
LSELEDN
L Emmanuel Fortune
11 novembre 1713
Compagnie de L'assiente
Française
Maurice de Cananville
224
Nantes
Guadeloupe,
LSELEDN
L Esperance
6 decembre 1713
J, Danssainct
Française
J, Cavers
183 dont 86 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
L Esperance
15 janvier 1714
Mathurin Joubert
Française
Kermark de Kerlinir
270 dont 40 morts
Nantes
Cayenne
LSELEDN
L Hercule
20 juin 1709
Montaudoin et consorts
Française
Samuel Morisse
485 dont 82 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
La Belle Pauline
1783
WEISS Et fils
suisse
?
568
La Rochelle
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
La Concorde
13 avril 1713
Montaudoin et consorts
Française
Isaac Thomas
418 dont 55 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
La Fauvette
1791
Baux Balguerie & Cie
suisse
?
?
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
La Fidelite
28 aout 1713
Jean Montaudois et consorts
Française
Julien Glemeau
440 dont 30 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
La Gaillarde
26 avril 1710
Sébastien Perises
Française
Jean Terrien
395
Nantes
La Havane
LSELEDN
La Gaillarde
25 juillet 1713
Périssel et consorts
Française
Michel Denis
433 dont 33 morts
Nantes
Martinique Cap
LSELEDN
La Genereuse
13 avril 1713
Montaudoin et consorts
Française
Guillaume Thomas
95 dont 14 morts
Nantes
Cayenne
LSELEDN
La Genevieve
20 novembre 1714
Pierre Bernier
Française
Pierre Allesne
242 dont 40 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
La Georgette
1788
RIEDY & THURNINGER
suisse
?
33
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
La Georgette
1789
RIEDY & THURNINGER
suisse
?
278
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
La Georgette
1790
RIEDY & THURNINGER
suisse
?
269
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
La Georgette
1791
RIEDY & THURNINGER
suisse
?
306
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
La Gracieuse
4 juin 1713
Robin et consorts
Française
P, Burgevin
287 dont 87 morts
Nantes
Cayenne Martinique
LSELEDN
La Marie
15 juillet 1714
Sarrebourse de Hauteville et consorts
Française
Jean Terrien
200 dont 25 ou 35 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
La Marie Magdelaine
10 juin 1714
Sarrebourse de Hauteville et consorts
Française
F, Avril
350 dont 91 morts
Nantes
Martinique et Cap
LSELEDN
La Marie-Thérese
1783
VAN BERBERSHEM
suisse
?
?
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
La Nymphe
28 aout 1713
Robin et consorts
Française
Pierre Grillaud
225
Nantes
Cap
LSELEDN
La Paix
24 juin 1714
Delaunay Montaudoin
Française
Pierre Jaheu
240 dont 18 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
La Reine
16 decembre 1713
Louis Danssainct
Française
Jean Danssainct
450 ou 480 dont 167 morts
Nantes
Rio de Janeiro, Bahia
LSELEDN
La Sainte-Agnes
22 janvier 1714
Luc Schiell
Française
Desmarais Joubert
504 dont 289 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
La Vigilante
1774
J, Montet, Henry & Cie
suisse
?
?
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
La Ville De Basle
1786
WEISS Et fils
suisse
?
236
La Rochelle
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
La Ville De Lausanne
1790
D'Illens, Van Berchem
suisse
?
550
Marseille
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
L'Adelle
1787
Rivier et Cie
suisse
?
272
Le Havre
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
L'Adelle
1789
Rivier et Cie
suisse
?
325
Le Havre
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
L'Affriquain
1783
RIEDY & THURNINGER
suisse
?
485
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
L'Affriquain
28 Septembre 1712
Montaudoin et consorts
Française
Jean Le Roux
,,,,,,,,,,,
Nantes
,,,,,
LSELEDN
L'Affriquain
26 septembre 1714
René Montaudoin
Française
René Budan
467 dont 105 morts
Nantes
Cap
LSELEDN
L'aimable Flore
1788
J,R, Wirz & Cie
suisse
?
59
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
L'aimable Julie
1786
J,R, Wirz & Cie
suisse
?
62
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
L'Alliance
1783
Abraham Gradis
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
L'Anaz
1791
D'Illens, Van Berchem
suisse
?
?
Marseille
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Lark *
1774
Aaron Lopez
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Le Blason
17 mars 1714
Jean Simon pour la Compagnie de l'assiento
Française
Gaspard Le Blanc
386 dont 114 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
Le Brillant
23 octobre 1709
Française
Antoine de Cazalis
590 dont 62 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
Le Cerf
1789
Baux Balguerie & Cie
suisse
?
?
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Cerf
1790
Baux Balguerie & Cie
suisse
?
?
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Cesar
6 janvier 1709
,,,,
Française
Jean de Cazalis
210 dont 30 morts
Nantes
Grenade et Saint-Domingue
LSELEDN
Le Chasseur
1789
Baux Balguerie & Cie
suisse
?
300
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Comte De Lamoignon
10 mars 1712
Française
Gabriel Legac
465
Nantes
Carthagène, Portobello, La Havane
LSELEDN
Le Conquerant
1788
Rivier et Cie
suisse
?
420
Le Havre
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Conquerant
1791
Rivier et Cie
suisse
?
400
Le Havre
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Cultivateur
1815
ROSSEL et BOUDET
suisse
?
519
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Dauphin
1822
ROSSEL et BOUDET
suisse
?
?
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Dauphin
18 octobre 1710
,,,,
Française
Louis Lepage
64 dont 4 morts
Nantes
Cayenne La Havane
LSELEDN
Le Duc De Bretagne
27 novembre 1708
Compagnie Royale de Guinée
Française
Jean Le Roux
592
Nantes
Grenade et Saint-Domingue
LSELEDN
Le Duc De Bretagne
7 novembre 1710
,,,,,
Française
Samuel Morisse
,,,,,
Nantes
Saint-Domingue
LSELEDN
Le Duc De Bretagne
4 septembre 1714
Dumotay Bossinot
Française
Jacques Prado
470 dont 72 morts
Nantes
Cap
LSELEDN
Le Duc De Normandie
1786
J,R, Wirz & Cie
suisse
?
203
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Duc de normandie
1790
J,R, Wirz & Cie
suisse
?
279
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Fleurissant
23 avril 1714
Michel Le Ray et consorts
Française
Julien Marchais
118 dont 50 morts
Nantes
Cayenne
LSELEDN
Le Francois(Vaisseau Du Roi)
1712
Compagnie de L'assiente
Française
Bigot
470 ou 570
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
Le georges
1787
RIEDY & THURNINGER
suisse
?
553
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Georges
1789
RIEDY & THURNINGER
suisse
?
440
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Georges
1790
RIEDY & THURNINGER
suisse
?
382
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Grand Duc De Bretagne
25 janvier 1714
Bertrand et consorts
Française
Achille Lavigne
375 entre 25 et 50 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
Le Jason
26 mai 1710
,,,,,
Française
André Bremont
291 dont 6 morts
Nantes
Grenade, La Havane, Martinique
LSELEDN
Le Jason
19 decembre 1712
Martin Thiercelin et consorts
Française
Louis Lebourg
250 dont 46 morts
Nantes
Jamaique Carthagène
LSELEDN
Le Jeune Auguste
1790
RIEDY & THURNINGER
suisse
?
180
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Leopard
23 octobre 1709
Française
Guillaume Bouet
366 dont 116 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
Le Lévrier
1789
Baux Balguerie & Cie
suisse
?
?
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Luzancay
19 septembre 1712
Delaunay Montaudoin
Française
Samuel morisse
300
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
Le Luzancay
27 septembre 1714
Delaunay Montaudoin
Française
Jean Le Couteux
345 dont 48 morts
Nantes
Martinique, Cap
LSELEDN
Le Mercure
12 juin 1713
De Beaulieu Beloteau
Française
Guillaume Pichaud
413 dont 42 morts
Nantes
Guadeloupe, Cap, Léogane
LSELEDN
Le Nélée
1789
Baux Balguerie & Cie
suisse
?
339
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Nélée
1792
Baux Balguerie & Cie
suisse
?
?
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Nestor
1790
J,Monet,Henry&Bellamy
suisse
?
150
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Nouvel Achille
1783
WEISS Et fils
suisse
?
355
La Rochelle
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Parfait
1783
Abraham Gradis
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Le Passepartout
1790
RIEDY & THURNINGER
suisse
?
(naufrage)
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Pays De Vaud
1790
D'Illens, Van Berchem
suisse
?
485
Marseille
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Petit Blason
17 mars 1714
Jean Simon
Française
Jean Viau
48 dont 4 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
Le Petit Georges
1791
RIEDY & THURNINGER
suisse
?
?
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Phaeton
7 septembre 1714
De Cazalis Pradine
Française
Jean Ingrand
220 dont 20 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
Le Pontchartrain
27 septembre 1714
Compagnie du Sénégal
Française
Joseph Lemagnen
341 dont 19 morts
Nantes
Cap
LSELEDN
Le Réciproque
1792
Baux Balguerie & Cie
suisse
?
?
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Reparateur
1786
WEISS Et fils
suisse
?
410
La Rochelle
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Reparateur
1787
WEISS Et fils
suisse
?
469
La Rochelle
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Reparateur
1790
WEISS Et fils
suisse
?
362
La Rochelle
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Saint-Clement
1784
THURNINGER
suisse
?
150
Rochefort
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Saint-Joseph
14 mai 1709
Laurencin et consorts,
Française
Simon Catho
300 dont 11 morts
Nantes
Cayenne
LSELEDN
Le Scipion
16 decembre 1713
Pradine et consorts
Française
Alain Duguay
110 dont 43 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
Le Superbe
24 octobre 1710
,,,,,,,,,
Française
jacques Monfort
240 dont 10 morts
Nantes
Martinique
LSELEDN
Le Vainqueur
1783
Abraham Gradis
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Le Vainqueur
21 octobre 1714
Charles Trochon
Française
Raymond Billet
le bateau echoue en afrique
Nantes
,,,,,,,,,,,
LSELEDN
Le Vigilant
1774
J, Montet, Henry & Cie
suisse
?
351
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Le Zephir
1 juin 1713
Le Coq et Sigougne et consorts
Française
Charles Fontaine
260 dont 118 morts
Nantes
Cap
LSELEDN
Leghorn
?
Rodrigo Pacheco
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
L'Elise
1783
WEISS Et fils
suisse
?
120
La Rochelle
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
L'Elise
1822
ROSSEL et BOUDET
suisse
?
?
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Les 13 cantons
1783
WEISS Et fils
suisse
?
499
La Rochelle
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Les 13 Cantons
1786
WEISS Et fils
suisse
?
283
La Rochelle
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
L'Espiegle
1790
RIEDY & THURNINGER
suisse
?
28
Nantes
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
L'Helvtie
1791
D'Illens, Van Berchem
suisse
?
?
Marseille
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
L'Iris
1783
WEISS Et fils
suisse
?
?
La Rochelle
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
Lord Howe
1758
Naphtali, Isaac, Abraham Hart
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
L'Union
1787
J,Monet,Henry&Bellamy
suisse
?
250
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51)
L'Union
1789
J,Monet,Henry&Bellamy
suisse
?
113
Bordeaux
?
LSELEDN (p.50-51) (p.50-51)
Mars
1773
Moses, David Franks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Mary
?
Jacob Rivera, Aaron Lopez
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Mary & Abigail
1713
Abraham de Lucena & Justus Bosch
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Mary and Ann
?
Moses Levy
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Mendon
1087 (saisie)
?
?
Johnathan Fitch
?
Congo
Amérique
QLAELONDLE t.2 (p,64)
Myrtilla
1745
Nathan Levy & David Franks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Nancy
1806
David G. Seixas & Benjamin S. Spitzer
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Nancy
?
Myer Pollack
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Nassau
?
Moses Levy
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
New York
1771
Aaron Lopez
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Nina
?
Luis de Santagel, Juan Cabrero
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Orion
1859 21 juin (saisie)
Rudolph Blumenberg
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Orleans
?
Hayman Levy
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Parthenope
1745
Nathan Levy & David Franks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Patriarch Abraham
1783
Abraham Gradis
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Pearl
?
Emanuel Alvares Correa & Moses Cardozo & Abraham Hart
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Peggy *
1760
Naphtali Hart
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Perfect
1758
Naphtali, Isaac, Abraham Hart
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Phila
1745
Nathan Levy & David Franks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Pinta
?
Luis de Santagel, Juan Cabrero
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Polly
1783
Abraham Gradis
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Polly
1747
Joseph Marks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Postillion
1721
Nathan Simson
?
?
217 au total
Afrique
New York
TSRBBAJ (p.96)
Prince George
?
Isaac Elizer, Samuel Moses
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Prince Orange
1749
Joseph Marks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Prudent Betty
?
Jacob Phoenix, Henry Cruger
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Rabbit
1758
Naphtali, Isaac, Abraham Hart
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Rachel Marks
1737
Lydia (54)
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Rebecca
1806
Joseph Bueno
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Rebecca
?
Moses Lopez
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.195)
Rising Sun
1758
Naphtali, Isaac, Abraham Hart
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Royal Charlotte
?
Aaron Lopez
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Sally
?
Saul Brown & Bros
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Santa Maria
?
Luis de Santagel, Juan Cabrero
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Sea Flower
1745
Nathan Levy & David Franks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Sherbo
?
Jacob Rivera
?
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Shiprah
?
Naphtali Hart
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Spry
?
Jacob Rivera, Aaron Lopez
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Three Friends
?
Jacob Rivera & Co.
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Two Sisters
1760
John Franks
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Union
?
Moses Seixas
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.193)
Young Adrian
1720
Mordecai Gomez & Rodrigo Pacheco
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Young Catherine
1720
Mordecai Gomez & Rodrigo Pacheco
Jewish
?
?
?
?
TSRBBAJ (p.194)
Zong
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
QLAELONDLE t.2 (p,15)
?
1655
Benjamin D'Acosta
?
?
1100
Bresil
Martinique
TSRBBAJ (p.78)
Other ships: White Hourse owned by Jan de Sweetvts, Jew, Expedition, owned by John and Jacob Roosevelt, Jews,
Europeans suffered from tropical diseases that the Africans were immune to. Africans were excellent workers and were used to a tropical climate. They had been traded as slaves for centuries, including among each other. The Muslims enslaved the Africans also.
Between 1450 and the end of the 1800s, slaves were obtained from along the west coast of Africa with the full and active co-operation of African kings and merchants. These African kings and merchants received various trade goods including beads, cowrie shells (used as currency), textiles, alcohol, horses, and guns. Ironically, these same guns were then used against the Europeans who colonized Africa in later years.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Trans-Atlantic exports by region 1650-1900
Region
Number of slaves accounted for
%
Senegambia
479,900
4.7
Upper Guinea
411,200
4.0
Windward Coast
183,200
1.8
Gold Coast
1,035,600
10.1
Blight of Benin
2,016,200
19.7
Blight of Biafra
1,463,700
14.3
West Central
4,179,500
40.8
South East
470,900
4.6
Total
10,240,200
100.0
Data derived from tables 1.1, 3.2, 3.4, 4.1 and 7.4 as presented in: Transformations in Slavery by Paul E. Lovejoy Cambridge University Press, 2000, ISBN 0-521-78430-1
Trans-Atlantic imports by region 1450-1900
Region
Number of slaves accounted for
%
Brazil
4,000,000
35.4
Spanish Empire
2,500,000
22.1
British West Indies
2,000,000
17.7
French West Indies
1,600,00
14.1
British North America and United States
500,000
4.4
Dutch West Indies
500,000
4.4
Danish West Indies
28,000
0.2
Europe (and Islands)
200,000
1.8
Total
11,328,000
100.0
Data derived from table II as presented in: The Slave Trade by Hugh Thomas Simon and Schuster, 1997, ISBN 0-68481063-8
The trade, including slave, between Africa, Europe and the Americas is called the Triangular Trade. The export of trade goods from Europe to Africa forms the first side of the triangular trade.
The transport of slaves from Africa to the Americas forms the middle passage of the triangular trade. The African slaves were introduced to new diseases and suffered from malnutrition long before they reached America. It's been suggested that the majority of deaths on the voyage across the Atlantic happened during the first couple of weeks due to malnutrition and disease encountered during the forced marches in Africa and the slave camps on the coast of Africa awaiting loading onto slave ships. In other words, thanks to the African kings, the slave were in terrible shape before they ever got on the slave ships.
It didn't help that conditions on the slave ships were terrible, yet the estimated death rate of around 13% is still lower than the mortality rate for seamen, officers and passengers on the same voyages.
Because of the slave trade, five times as many Africans arrived in the Americas than Europeans. They were used on plantations and mines. But, most went to Brazil, the Caribbean, and the Spanish Empire. Less than 5% went to the North American States.
The third, and final, leg of the triangular trade involved the return to Europe with the produce from the slave-labour plantations: cotton, sugar, tobacco, molasses and rum.
For more information see "Transformations in Slavery" by Paul E. Lovejoy, Cambridge University Press, 2000, and "The Slave Trade" by Hugh Thomas, Simon and Schuster, 1997
How did the African slaves get captures?
This first-hand account is very interesting in its detail.
Slave Trade:
the African Connection, ca 1788
The labor-intensive agriculture of the New World demanded a large workforce. Crops such as sugar cane, tobacco and cotton required an unlimited and inexpensive supply of strong backs to assure timely production for the European market. Slaves from Africa offered the solution. The slave trade between Western Africa and the America's reached its peak in the mid-18th century when it is estimated that over 80,000 Africans annually crossed the Atlantic to spend the rest of their lives in chains. Of those who survived the voyage, the final destination of approximately 40% was the Caribbean Islands. Thirty-eight percent ended up in Brazil, 17% in Spanish America and 6% in the United States. It was a lucrative business. A slave purchased on the African coast for the equivalent of 14 English pounds in bartered goods in 1760 could sell for 45 pounds in the American market. A slave's journey to a life of servitude often began in the interior of Africa with his or her capture as a prize of war, as tribute given by a weak tribal state to a more powerful one, or by outright kidnapping by local traders.European slave traders rarely ventured beyond Africa's coastal regions. The African interior was riddled with disease, the natives were often hostile and the land uncharted. The Europeans preferred to stay in the coastal region and have the natives bring the slaves to them.
"Most of the Negroes shipped off from the coast of Africa are kidnapped."
Dr. Alexander Falconbridge served as the surgeon aboard a number of slave ships that plied their trade between the West African coast and the Caribbean in the late 1700s. He described his experiences in a popular book published in 1788. He became active in the Anti-Slavery Society and was appointed Governor of a colony established for freed slaves on the coast of modern-day Sierra Leone. His service was brief as he died in 1788 shortly after his appointment. We join his story as he describes the process through which the native African looses his freedom:
"There is great reason to believe, that most of the Negroes shipped off from the coast of Africa, are kidnapped. But the extreme care taken by the black traders to prevent the Europeans from gaining any intelligence of their modes of proceeding; the great distance inland from whence the Negroes are brought; and our ignorance of their language (with which, very frequently, the black traders themselves are equally unacquainted), prevent our obtaining such information on this head as we could wish. I have, however, by means of occasional inquiries, made through interpreters, procured some intelligence relative to the point. . . . From these I shall select the following striking instances: While I was in employ on board one of the slave ships, a Negro informed me that being one evening invited to drink with some of the black traders, upon his going away, they attempted to seize him. As he was very active, he evaded their design, and got out of their hands. He was, however, prevented from effecting his escape by a large dog, which laid hold of him, and compelled him to submit. These creatures are kept by many of the traders for that purpose; and being trained to the inhuman sport, they appear to be much pleased with it.
I was likewise told by a Negro woman that as she was on her return home, one evening, from some neighbors, to whom she had been making a visit by invitation, she was kidnapped; and, notwithstanding she was big with child, sold for a slave. This transaction happened a considerable way up the country, and she had passed through the hands of several purchasers before she reached the ship.
A man and his son, according to their own information, were seized by professed kidnappers, while they were planting yams, and sold for slaves. This likewise happened in the interior parts of the country, and after passing through several hands, they were purchased for the ship to which I belonged. It frequently happens that those who kidnap others are themselves, in their turns, seized and sold.
. . . During my stay on the coast of Africa, I was an eye-witness of the following transaction: a black trader invited a Negro, who resided a little way up the country, to come and see him. After the entertainment was over, the trader proposed to his guest, to treat him with a sight of one of the ships lying in the river. The unsuspicious countryman readily consented, and accompanied the trader in a canoe to the side of the ship, which he viewed with pleasure and astonishment. While he was thus employed, some black traders on board, who appeared to be in the secret, leaped into the canoe, seized the unfortunate man, and dragging him into the ship, immediately sold him.
The preparations made at Bonny by the black traders, upon setting out for the fairs which are held up the country, are very considerable. From twenty to thirty canoes, capable of containing thirty or forty Negroes each, are assembled for this purpose; and such goods put on board them as they expect will be wanted for the purchase of the number of slaves they intend to buy.
When their loading is completed, they commence their voyage, with colors flying, and music playing; and in about ten or eleven days, they generally return to Bonny with full cargoes. As soon as the canoes arrive at the trader's landing place, the purchased Negroes are cleaned, and oiled with palm-oil; and on the following day they are exposed for sale to the captains.
When the Negroes, whom the black traders have to dispose of, are shown to the European purchasers, they first examine them relative to their age. They then minutely inspect their persons, and inquire into the state of their health, if they are afflicted with any infirmity, or are deformed, or have bad eyes or teeth; if they are lame, or weak in their joints, or distorted in the back, or of a slender make, or are narrow in the chest; in short, if they have been, or are afflicted in any manner, so as to render them incapable of much labor; if any of the foregoing defects are discovered in them, they are rejected. But if approved of, they are generally taken on board the ship the same evening. The purchaser has liberty to return on the following morning, but not afterwards, such as upon re-examination are found exceptionable.
The traders frequently beat those Negroes which are objected to by the captains, and use them with great severity. It matters not whether they are refused on account of age, illness, deformity, or for any other reason. At New Calabar, in particular . . . the traders, when any of their Negroes have been objected to, have dropped their canoes under the stern of the vessel, and instantly be headed them, in sight of the captain.
As soon as the wretched Africans, purchased at the fairs, fall into the hands of the black traders, they experience an earnest of those dreadful sufferings which they are doomed in future to undergo. . . . They are brought from the places where they are purchased to Bonny, etc. in canoes; at the bottom of which they lie, having their hands tied with a kind of willow twigs, and a strict watch is kept over them. Their usage in other respects, during the time of the passage, which generally lasts several days, is equally cruel. Their allowance of food is so scanty, that it is barely sufficient to support nature. They are, besides, much exposed to the violent rains which frequently fall here, being covered only with mats that afford but a slight defense; and as there is usually water at the bottom of the canoes, from their leaking, they are scarcely ever dry."
References: This eyewitness account appears in Falconbridge, Alexander, An Account of the Slave Trade on the Coast of Africa (1788); Curtin, Phillip D. Atlantic Slave Trade (1969); Matheson, William Law, Great Britain and the Slave Trade, 1839-1865 (1967). How To Cite This Article: "Slave Trade: the African Connection, ca 1788" EyeWitness to History, www.eyewitnesstohistory.com (2007).
The Black traders have mistreated the captured African long before the poor slave ever entered the hands of the ship's captain. They had been starved, beaten, and abused. And in some cases, murdered. It's no wonder that so many of them died on the way to their final destination, most of them in the first two weeks. Statistics prove that more European immigrants and ship's crews died on the Atlantic voyage than did African slaves. Yes, slavery was reprehensible, but let's be honest about the history of slavery.
So you see, slavery was much more complicated than you've been told.
Finally, no discussion on slavery is complete without talking about "reparations," widely discussed in 2002 but not much in recent years. Should we, or shouldn't we, pay for the mis-deeds of those who came before us?
Today's False Flag Weekly News may start a few minutes late. We're being blocked by NSA. Should have a workaround up and go live a few minutes after 11 a.m. Eastern (8 a.m. Pacific). http://NoLiesRadio.org
WHAT WAS NSA DOING WHEN ISRAEL WAS ATTACKING THE USS LIBERTY IN 1967??? THEY WERE HELPING ISRAEL AND JOHNSON TO SINK THE USS LIBERTY AND THEN NUKE CAIRO! THAT PLAN IS STILL ON THE AGENDA! ALAN HART IS A BLOODY LIAR REGARDING THIS MATTER!
Kevin Barrett 2 hrs ·[Thursday 12 March 2015]
Today's False Flag Weekly News may start a few minutes late. We're being blocked by NSA. Should have a workaround up and go live a few minutes after 11 a.m. Eastern (8 a.m. Pacific). http://NoLiesRadio.org
The English philologistRobert Nares (1753–1829) says that the word hoax was coined in the late 18th century as a contraction of the verb hocus, which means "to cheat",[3]"to impose upon"[3] or "to befuddle often with drugged liquor".[4]Hocus is a shortening of the magicincantationhocus pocus,[4] whose origin is disputed.[5]
A hoax is a deliberately fabricated falsehood made to masquerade as truth.[1] It is distinguishable from errors in observation or judgment,[1] or rumors, urban legends, pseudosciences or April Fools' Day events that are passed along in good faith by believers or as jokes.[2]
Source: Wikipedia
THE TITANIC ACCIDENT HOAX THE MOON LANDING HOAX MACRO EVOLUTION HOAX ALBERT EINSTEIN HOAX VATICAN HOAX MICHAEL KING HOAX (MLK) NELSON MANDELA HOAX MOHUNDAS KARAMCHAND GANDHI HOAX SANDY HOOK HOAX BOSTON BOMBING HOAX GLOBAL WARMING HOAX 6 MILLION JEWISH HOLOCAUST HOAX 6,000 YEAR-OLD JEWISH SUFFERING THE ROMAN JESUS CHRIST HOAX THE SANTA CLAUS HOAX THE JUDAISM HOAX THE ANTI-SEMITISM HOAX THE FRENCH, AMERICAN AND RUSSIAN REVOLUTIONS HOAXES. AL-QAEDA, ISIS, ISIL, IS, DAECH, BOKO HARAM, USAMA BIN LADIN HOAXES. IRAKI WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION HOAX IRANIAN WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION HITLER'S NAZISM HOAX THE RICHARD DAWKINS HOAX THE WHITE EUROPEAN AND THE CHOSEN PEOPLE SUPREMACIST HOAXES SUICIDE HOAXES THE ISRAELI SECURUTY HOAX THE UNO HOAX AIDS AND VACCINES HOAXES FREEDOM OF SPEECH HOAX HUMAN RIGHTS HOAX THE DEMOCRACY HOAX THE JUSTICE SYSTEM HOAX THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM HOAX THE FIAT MONEY AND USURY HOAXES
Part 1: Analysis of the Lunar Photography - This compelling video throws into serious doubt the authenticity of the Apollo missions and features information that challenges the declared abilities of NASA to successfully send a man to the Moon and return him safely to Earth. New evidence clearly suggests that NASA hoaxed pictures allegedly taken on the lunar surface. These findings are supported by analysis and the testimony of experts from a wide variety of scientific disciplines.
Note: This was the hardest film for us to post here at UFOTV, as most of us were born around the Apollo era and many of us hold NASA's achievement of landing a Man on the Moon and bringing him safely back, as sacred. But in the interest of remaining neutral and posting all information on controversies in science, regardless of our personal beliefs and those of the management at UFOTV, we bring you what critics have chosen as the greatest filmed investigation on this matter to date.
As powerful as the evidence presented in this film and its sister film may seem, we highly recommend that you view our film called "Quantum Hologram & ESP - Astronaut Edgar Mitchell," that sheds light on Edgar Mitchell's experience as the 6th man to walk upon the Moon and his experience aboard Apollo 14 at that time. His experience during this mission as described on this presentation must not be overlooked.
What Happened On the Moon? - An Investigation Into Apollo - NOW ON DVD - Full Version 222 mins. on 2-DVDs, Cat# K481. Go to http://www.UFOTV.com.
Award winning filmmaker Bart Sibrel presents his highly acclaimed (and much hated) controversial documentary showcasing newly discovered behind-the-scenes out-takes from the first mission to the moon, proving that the crew never left earth orbit.
Never before in all of recorded aviation has a flying machine worked on its first attempt, much less the most complicated one ever imagined, landing on another heavenly body on its maiden voyage, and returning roundtrip with a crew that lived to tell, all with 1960's technology. (More computing power is found today in a $10 watch.)
According to William Kaysing, a NASA contractor for Apollo, a classified interdepartmental memo rated the odds of a successful and survivable manned lunar landing on its first attempt at one in ten thousand. That is why the returning men of the mission looked so dejected rather than triumphant at their press conference, as they were blackmailed into lying about the alleged greatest accomplishment of mankind, to the detriment of their own souls.
Sibrel has been interviewed, and his documentary about the moon landings have been featured on, The Tonight Show, The Daily Show, Geraldo at Large, The Abrams Report, Coast to Coast, NBC, CNN, FOX, Time Magazine, The New York Times, The L.A. Times, The Washington Post and USA Today.
From his experience as a professional photograph Marcus Allen points the lens at NASA's photographic record of what is stated as being Mankinds greatest achievement - Landing a man on the Moon and returning him to Earth. A feat undertaken by the U.S. military between 1969 - 1972. Marcus demonstrates a plethora of problems with the photographic record that indicates only that the record is falsely being promoted as the authentic record of that historic period of the US Space flight history.
Marcus Allen presented "The Apollo Moon Landings" at the 5th British Exopolitics Expo held at the University of Huddersfield on September 28th 2013.
This video explains why the russians did not contest Apollo, and it has nothing to do with the general accepted fact that it was because they were acknowledging it was real. If the russians had been expecting nothing from the Americans, they would have contested it even if it was real. If they did not contest it, it is only because the Americans were giving them something against their silence. This video explains what this something was. Some links: A link to an article in a newspaper of 1961 showing the problems in Gagarin's flight: http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid... A link to the chronology of the invasion of the bay of pigs: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/bayofpig... A link giving the evidence that there was no other evidence than JFK's photos of the presence of the missiles in Cuba: http://www.marxists.org/history/cuba/... A link of a very interesting of Michael Bradley which convinced me that there was something seriously wrong about the so-called crisis of the cuban missiles: http://michaelbradley.info/cargoesofc... A link to the photos of JFK on the national archive site: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/cuba... A link to my own video showing the anomalies in JFK's photos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=449O-V... This is a repost of the video, because of some grammar errors I had to correct (notably in the title).
Music
"Symphony No. 3 In E Flat Major - Eroica Symphony, Op. 55: II. Marcia Funebre - Adagio Assai" by The Philharmonia Orchestra, Herbert von Karajan, The Philharmonia Orchestra, Herbert von Karajan ()
Conspiracy of Silence, a documentary listed for viewing in TV Guide Magazine was to be aired on the Discovery Channel, on May 3, 1994. This documentary exposed a network of religious leaders and Washington politicians who flew children to Washington D.C. for sex orgies.
Many children suffered the indignity of wearing nothing but their underwear and a number displayed on a piece of cardboard hanging from their necks when being auctioned off to foreigners in Las Vegas, Nevada and Toronto, Canada.
At the last minute before airing, unknown congressmen threatened the TV Cable industry with restrictive legislation if this documentary was aired. Almost immediately, the rights to the documentary were purchased by unknown persons who had ordered all copies destroyed.
A copy of this videotape was furnished anonymously to former Nebraska state senator and attorney John De Camp who made it available to retired FBI Agent Ted L. Gunderson. While the video quality is not top grade, this tape is a blockbuster in what is revealed by the participants involved.
ALAIN SORAL ET MICHAEL HOFFMAN - QUI CONTRÔLE LE VOCABULAIRE CONTRÔLE VOTRE CERVEAU! Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Alain Soral : Judaïsme, talmudisme et sionisme
QUI CONTRÔLE LE VOCABULAIRE CONTRÔLE VOTRE CERVEAU!
QUAND VOUS VOUS SOUMETTEZ AU MATÉRIEL LINGUISTIQUE DE L'ENNEMI, VOUS AVEZ DÉJÀ PERDU AVANT DE COMMENCER!
C'est remarquable de voir un Français parler avec autant de justesse et de courage. Le Pr Michael Hoffman confirme la justesse des propos d'Alain Soral sur la mauvaise utilisation des vocables de l'ennemi. Le Dr Tariq Ramadan tombe dans ce piège tout le temps, à croire qu'il le fait exprès en permettant à ses détracteurs de toujours en rajouter une couche, et de le ridiculiser systématiquement ainsi que son combat! Par exemple, depuis des décennies, les pressetititués n'ont cessé d'insulter son grand-père Hassan al Banna à chaque rencontre télévisée dans le but de le décrédibiliser avant même de l'interviewer. C'est un peu comme George Marchais qui subissait des attaques similaires en avalanche avant même le début des interviews.
Mais, dès que nous voyons ce stratagème se répéter, il faut se méfier des personnes, d'ailleurs toujours les mêmes, qui sont soi-disant interviewés, surtout lors des opérations sous faux drapeaux ou des campagnes de diabolisation de la religion, de Dieu, du christianisme, de l'Islam, et des Croyants.
BAFS
Ce samedi 14 mars 2015
Alain Soral: Le pédophile Jack Lang à la tête de Institut du Monde Arabe
Laïcité française - intolérance de l'État laïque par M. Rafic Soormally
1. Introduction
La laïcité est un concept français qui sépare lÉglise catholique de lÉtat, y compris l'enseignement.
Un laïc est un prêtre catholique qui n'appartient pas au clergé. Alors, un laïcat se réfère à un « ensemble des laïques dans lÉglise catholique ». La laïcité [dérivée de laïque ou laïc adj. et n. (latin: laicus; grecque: laikos, qui appartient au peuple)] est un terme qui préconise lindépendance des conceptions religieuses ou partisanes, et désigne un système qui exclut lÉglise catholique de lexercice du pouvoir politique ou administratif, et en particulier de lorganisation de lenseignement public. Le laïcisme est la « doctrine des partisans de la laïcisation des institutions ». Laïcisation est laction de laïciser, qui, à son tour, veut dire « rendre laïque ».
La laïcité est un signe dune sécularisation de la société. Le terme séculariser veut dire rendre (des clercs) à la vie laïque. Séculier ou séculière (du latin: saeculum, siècle) se dit dun prêtre qui nappartient à aucun ordre ou institut religieux (par opp. à régulier); qui vit dans le siècle, et na pas fait de vux monastiques.
Dans la France pré-1789, le Catholicisme était reconnu comme la religion officielle. Le concept de la laïcité fut affirmé pour la première fois en matière politique avec la Révolution française [1789], qui renversa la Monarchie Bourbon et pour objectif de séparer lÉglise Catholique de lÉtat. La laïcité apparaît comme un des fondements du pacte républicain. Laffirmation de la laïcité ne postule pas la disparition du principe spirituel, mais fait de celui-ci une pratique individuelle, relevant exclusivement de la sphère privée. Mais il y a eu beaucoup de dérogations et de controverses durant lère post-Révolution française.
Le système laïque français ne reconnaît, au niveau de lÉtat, ni lexistence dun principe religieux, et ni les spécificités des communautés, laissant ainsi les croyances religieuses uniquement aux niveaux individuels. En France, lhistoire de la laïcité présente une originalité certaine, et les termes « laïque », « laïcité » sont intraduisibles hors des langues latines. Quoique la laïcité dénote la sécularisation de létat, un état séculier nest pas nécessairement laïque.
2. La philosophie des Lumières et la naissance de la laïcité
Les hiérarchies qui dominèrent les sociétés occidentales au Moyen Âge reproduisaient la primauté du spirituel sur le temporel, tel que le concevait par exemple Saint Augustin [354-430] dans la Cité de Dieu. Le roi de France était « le lieutenant de Dieu sur terre ». Sacré à Reims par larchevêque de la ville, il reçoit alors lonction et prête serment de défendre lÉglise catholique et sa foi. La Réforme affirma le principe de lidentité entre le souverain et les sujets, selon ladage « cujus regio, ejus religio » - telle la religion du prince, telle celle du pays. Cette primauté du spirituel sur le temporel se traduisait dans tous les actes de la vie sociale (à la naissance, au mariage et à la mort); elle avait de plus une incidence très directe sur le statut sociale des fidèles qui ne pratiquaient pas la religion principale du pays, le Catholicisme, comme dans le cas des Protestants et des Juifs dans la société française.
La philosophie des Lumières [1745-1785] se veut en France - Descartes lannonçait - essentiellement laïque. Elle refuse dêtre la servante de la théologie. Les circonstances propres à la France - sa centralisation, son catholicisme dÉtat, une Église catholique qui continue ses procès de sorcellerie, une agriculture défaillante, son intolérance de Contre-Réforme - ont fait, dans ce pays, de la philosophie anticléricale. La philosophie des Lumières est celle qui retire la France de l « obscurantisme catholique ». [v. Descartes, Malebranche, Fontenelle, Fénelon, Voltaire, Montesquieu, Diderot, Rousseau, quelle que soit leur diversité].
Aux États Unis, la Révolution Américaine [1776] fut inspirée de la philosophie des Lumières. Quoique la séparation de lÉglise et de lÉtat est formellement insérée dans le 1er Amendement de la Constitution [1791], démontrant le principe de la sécularisation de lÉtat, le système américain permet, en cxistence sociale, lexistence de la liberté religieuse et lexistence dune religion civile qui perdure encore aujourdhui. La France révolutionnaire et post-révolutionnaire ne pourra pas réaliser cette cxistence et elle inventera une solution différente: la laïcité, terme emprunté à lÉglise catholique.
Des auteurs comme Voltaire se firent les défenseurs de la tolérance tandis que, pour la France, la théorie de Rousseau saverrait très paradoxale, car elle faisait partie des dogmes élémentaires de la religion civile : « hors de lÉglise, point de salut ». Sans nommer le catholicisme, religion civile coïncidait avec religion positive, autrement dit dogmes de base de la morale sociale et système ecclésial particulier. Cela était inacceptable pour les partisans de la liberté religieuse, et, avec la Révolution française, dès 1789, la Déclaration des droits de lHomme affirma dans son article 10 le principe de la liberté de conscience: « nul ne doit être inquiété pour ses opinions, même religieuses, pourvu que leur manifestation ne trouble pas lordre public établi par la loi ». Les Juifs et les Protestants étaient alors égaux avec les Catholiques. Ce principe confirmait que la citoyenneté primait lappartenance confessionnelle. Tout en allant dans le sens dune laïcisation, lÉtat assurait désormais les actes de létat civil à la place de lÉglise catholique, et se préoccupait de mettre en place les fondements dun enseignement public.
3. Les controverses
Durant les années sous le Consulat, Napoléon Bonaparte définissait le cadre institutionnel de la laïcité. La signature du Concordat avec Rome [1801] reconnaissait le Catholicisme comme «religion de la majorité des Français», mais nexcluait pas la reconnaissance des autres cultes (protestant et israélite) et leur organisation et structures capables de représenter ces communautés auprès des pouvoirs publiques. La laïcisation de létat civil et le droit au divorce étaient confirmés. Lorganisation du système éducatif échappait ainsi au contrôle de lÉglise, sauf pour lenseignement primaire.
Mais cet ordre restait toujours instable. Le régime de la Restauration [1814], tout en confirmant le principe de la liberté religieuse, rétablit linterdiction du divorce [1815] et promulgua la loi sur le sacrilège [1825]. Dans lenseignement, la neutralité subissait de multiples dérogations, comme la dérogation au monopole étatique pour lenseignement primaire [loi Guizot, 1833] puis secondaire [loi Falloux, 1850]. Ces dérogations marquaient aussi la IIe République [1852-1870].
Les débuts de la IIIè République fut marqués par un affrontement entre légitimistes et républicains opportunistes et radicaux (les deux France). Ces derniers partagèrent une philosophie de rationalisme kantien, avec une appartenance à la franc-maçonnerie, et estimèrent que la laïcité était indissociable des valeurs de la République à construire. Les lois Ferry [1882 et 1886] avaient pour ambition denraciner la République, en faisant de lécole lieu denseignement dune morale laïque, fondée sur les valeurs de la Révolution française [1789], le creuset de la nation. Pour Jules Ferry, la religion nest pas le fondement de la morale mais, au contraire, la morale constitue lélément solide et stable des religions. Une « morale laïque » peut donc devenir la valeur commune assurant le lien social. La laïcité est fondée sur le refus implicite dune religion civile. La séparation de lÉglise catholique et de lÉtat (1905), réalisé par le ministère Combes, marqua lapogée de cette crise entre légitimistes et républicains. Cette loi réaffirmait le principe de la liberté de conscience tout en indiquant ne plus reconnaître aucun culte (religion).
Quoique le principe de la laïcité fut lobjet de nombreuses dérogations sous le gouvernement de Vichy, le régime des lois de 1905 est implicite dans la constitution de 1946, repris en 1958, aux « principes fondamentaux reconnus par les lois de la République ». Les deux textes constitutionnels réaffirmaient par ailleurs le caractère laïque de la République française.
4. La tendance internationale
Lhistoire de la laïcité en France présente une originalité certaine, au point de nêtre, selon certains auteurs, que « lexception française ». Cette exception, réelle, nest pourtant que relative. Le premier piège est ici la langue : « laïque », « laïcité » sont intraduisibles hors des langues latines. En anglais, secular (par opposition à lay) apparaît comme une catégorie générale. Ainsi sexplique que, sur les 170 États internationalement reconnus, seuls 9 États francophones dAfrique et la Turquie (qui a démarqué le mot français) se sont proclamés « laïques ». Beaucoup plus nombreux sont ceux qui se pensent comme « séculiers », y compris les États-Unis. Les colons britanniques ou européens avaient fui leur pays pour trouver en Amérique la liberté religieuse. Cest cette liberté que les constituants voulurent préserver contre tout empiètement du nouvel État, à linverse de la France qui se heurtait à la dominance de lÉglise catholique.
En vertu de la Déclaration universelle des droits de lhomme [1948], tous reconnaissent le droit de chaque homme à la liberté publique (et non seulement privée) de conscience et de religion. Plusieurs pays, de moins en moins nombreux, continuent à reconnaître lautorité supérieure de lÉglise catholique (cétait le cas de lEspagne, de lItalie, de plusieurs pays latino-américains et quelques cantons suisses; cest encore le cas de Monaco et du Liechtenstein, du Guatemala, du Costa Rica et de la Colombie) ou de lÉglise orthodoxe (Grèce). La formulation la plus crue se trouve dans la Constitution de Malte, qui reconnaît à ses évêques « le droit et le devoir de dire le vrai et le faux, le bien et le mal en matière de principes » (art. 2.2). Radicalement différente est la situation des pays nordiques (Suède, Norvège, Danemark, Islande) et de lAngleterre : la situation privilégiée dune Eglise dite établie, nationale ou populaire, peut faire peser ses contraintes sur la population, voire sur la personne du souverain : elle laisse entière la souveraineté de lÉtat qui a autorité sur elle.
Une question reste ouverte : comment qualifier ces États qui font référence non à une Église particulière, mais à lautorité souveraine de Dieu? Ce fut le cas de la France déclarant les droits de lhomme « en présence et sous les auspices de lÊtre suprême » (ainsi que la rappelé la Constitution de 1958). Cest toujours celui des Etats-Unis, placés « under God », sous la souveraineté de Dieu, et dont la monnaie rappelle que « in God we trust », cest-à-dire, nous ne faisons confiance quen Dieu; comme de la Suisse : « Au nom de Dieu tout-Puissant » de sa Constitution fondatrice (1291).
À lopposé se trouvent - ou se trouvaient - les États communistes professant le marxisme athée. LÉtat restait celui de tous les citoyens, même sil privilégiait le Parti officiellement athée.
Hors du domaine chrétien, la situation est analogue : la Chine et le Vietnam restent dans la tradition marxiste; le Népal est un État hindou; le Bhoutan est un État Bouddhique; les Philippines suivent le modèle américain; la Corée du Sud interdit toute religion dÉtat, ainsi que le Japon depuis 1946. Le monde musulman présente à peu près tous les cas de figure, et lÉtat islamique nest quune des situations possibles.
Un tour du monde montre ainsi que bien des États contemporains sont encore loin dune conception laïque et se montrent inégalement avancés sur cette voie. Par ailleurs, bien des États dont le caractère séculier est incontestable ne sont pas disposés à se dire « laïques ». Dans les enceintes internationales, cest la sécularisation qui donne le ton.
5. Le cas de l'île Maurice
Pour éliminer linstitution du Gouverneur Général, qui était un symbole colonial, la République mauricienne sest inspirée du système indien sans consensus du peuple mauricien. Le symbolisme est la seule valeur qui caractérise la République mauricienne. Les termes républicain, citoyen et laïque, tels quils sont connus en France (dont le sens est loin de faire lunanimité des Français eux-mêmes), les copier à Maurice serait grotesque. LÉtat mauricien reconnaît toutes les religions, toutes les communautés et toutes les langues, que ce soit européennes, africaines ou orientales, de tous ses citoyens, qui devrait former la nation mauricienne. Le système mauricien effectivement rejette la laïcité malgré la désinformation qui se trouve dans les journaux pro-politique française.
LÉtat Civil que Maurice a hérité de ladministration française nimpose aucune religion civile, et lenseignement public nimpose aucune religion principale. Mais linstitution catholique, une vestige coloniale et esclavagiste, reste toujours une institution privilégiée car la rétrocession de ses biens coloniaux n'a jamais été faite en dépit de lindépendance de lîle Maurice [1968]. Et limposition du catholicisme est toujours pratiquée, dans une certaine mesure, dans des écoles à caractère confessionnelle catholique, malgré que ces écoles soient subventionnées par lÉtat. Le prêtre Maurice Piat du diocèse de Port Louis parle même de « lautorité catholique » en adressant ses demandes avec force à lÉtat mauricien [week-end, 09 avril 2000].
6. L'intolérance d'un État laïque ou une laïcité à la carte
La laïcité est considérée comme « une exception française » :
(1) sopposant non seulement aux modèles politiques à religion dÉtat, même sils sont élus par voie de la démocratie (par exemple, lAlgérie), mais
(2) sopposant également à une tradition anglo-saxonne qui reconnaît, sans adopter, dans le cadre de lÉtat, lexistence dun principe religieux, tout en laissant chaque citoyen adopter la croyance quil souhaite, et
(3) sopposant aussi à la solution américaine qui reconnaît les spécificités de toutes les communautés, tout en séparant la religion de lÉtat Civil.
En Turquie la laïcité est carrément imposée par une constante violation des droits de l'homme.
Le système laïque français ne reconnaît, au niveau de lÉtat, ni lexistence dun principe religieux, système basée sur lathéisme : «Après 1945 : anticléricalisme composite irréligieux, laïc (opposition aux écoles catholiques) ou matérialiste athée»], et ni les spécificités des races et des communautés (principe intégratrice), laissant les croyances religieuses et leurs enseignements à la sphère privée. Même les langues et lhabillement deviennent par force sujets à la laïcisation. Lenseignement des langues non européennes en France ne prend pas en considération les dimensions culturelles et religieuses de ces langues, comme les langues hébraïques, arabe, indiennes.
Par contre, la laïcité autorise et impose lenseignement de la théorie de lévolution biologique de l'espèce humaine, basée sur lathéisme, mais elle interdit catégoriquement lenseignement de la théorie de la création biblique ou autre. [v. les ouvrages du Dr Kent Hovind [USA] sur le créationnisme v/s lévolutionnisme]. Lathéisme préconise, entre autre, que cest la nature temporaire de la vie qui pousse les humains vers une croyance divine incertaine, et que la divinité, si elle existe vraiment, nest que dordre spirituel et non temporel, entravant ainsi le progrès et le développement.
Malgré son apparente intolérance étatique, les dérogations à la laïcité continuent principalement en faveur des Églises catholiques, protestantes et juives, qui semblent accepter tous les compromis, mais contre dautres religions, en particulier lIslam, malgré que la France compte entre 5 et 6 millions de Musulmans. Aujourd'hui la laïcité en France est devenue une arme anti-sémite arabe et anti-islamique dans une pratique d'intolérance sélective. Lîle sur, la Réunion, département français, sexprime parfois politiquement à contre-courant de la métropole, par exemple, en reconnaissant la spécificité des différentes ethnies et religions. Dans le but d'empêcher les Créoles de ses D.O.M.-T.O.M. , Départements et Territoires Outremers français, de faire des recherches plus approfondies sur leurs véritables identités ancestrales basées sur leurs langues (comme le Swahili, le Zulu) et religions (comme l'Islam), la France inventa aussi l'idéologie créoliste pour ses communautés dits créoles, la « créolité » étant une dérogation à la laïcité. La laïcité française est alors une laïcité à la carte !
7. Conclusion
La sécularisation et le déclin de la croyance et pratique religieuse étaient considérés par certains comme le cachet de la modernisation et de la démocratie libérale de louest. Mais récemment, depuis la Révolution iranienne [1979], la prise de conscience des 'valeurs' fondamentales de lIslam, la résurrection de la Nouvelle Droite et les valeurs fondamentales dans la politique des États Unis dans les années 1980, et le démantèlement des régimes communistes les plus séculiers (ultra laïques) vers la fin de cette décennie, la religion est largement reconnue « as a powerful element in both individual and public life », cest-à-dire, un puissant facteur tant dans la vie individuelle que dans la vie publique . Quoiquil en soit, malgré que, daprès Jules Ferry, cest la morale qui constitue lélément solide et stable des religions, et non vice versa, il est de plus en plus reconnu quun ordre moral ne peut pas être laïque car la moralité et les religions du monde sont inexorablement liées.
Auteur : M. RAFIC SOORMALLY Maidstone, Kent, Angleterre Ce samedi 29 juin 2002 (LVO) Ce dimanche 14 septembre 2003 (LNMF) Ce vendredi 19 novembre 2004 (BLADI.NET) Ghyslaine ROC
La laïcité à la française toujours dactualité à lîle Maurice, ancienne colonie franco-britannique, actuellement néo-colonie britannique. Des mensonges débités sans cesse par la presse francophone.
SAJ : Sir Aneerood Jugnauth, Président auto-proclamé de la République (bananière) de Maurice. Lactuel Premier Ministre, un Blanc (Franco-mauricien), Paul Raymond Bérenger ne fut pas élu aux dernières élections, mais avait fait un « deal » avec le Premier Ministre Sir Aneerood Jugnauth de partager entre eux le pouvoir politique, SAJ Premier Ministre pendant 3 ans, et ensuite Bérenger pendant 2 ans. Le mandat est de 5 ans. Mais, à la condition que SAJ remplace (sans élection) le Président en exercice, Karl Hoffmann, avec des pouvoirs « accrus », cest à dire quasi dictatoriaux.
« SÉCULIER VS LAÏQUE - Le Ramayana, SAJ et la laïcité, article publié le mardi 30 novembre 2004 dans le quotidien lExpress.
Maurice est un État séculier et non laïque. Exception française, la laïcité ne reconnaît au niveau du gouvernement aucune religion, race ou communauté. Le système séculier, lui, les reconnaît toutes.
Dans son article SAJ parlera le 30 décembre, paru dans lexpress du 10 novembre 2004, Monsieur Raj Meetarbhan nous dit que La décision de Sir Anerood Jugnauth procède dune volonté de respecter le principe de laïcité, auquel souscrivent les républicains.
Par de tels propos, M. Meetarbhan nous laisse-t-il entendre quil a déjà lu le texte que le président mauricien, Sir Anerood Jugnauth (SAJ), a lintention de lire le 30 décembre prochain, et que la laïcité sera mentionnée comme la raison de son choix de la date de son discours ? Comment M. Meetarbhan peut-t-il savoir que la décision de SAJ est motivée par la laïcité, le concept français quil explique très mal dailleurs ? Il prétend que les républicains souscrivent à la laïcité, mais quels républicains ? Les républicains français ont fait de la laïcité le fondement de leur république post-Révolution française. Mais les républicains iraniens ont fait de lislam le fondement de leur république post-révolution iranienne. Je me demande si M. Meetarbhan peut nous dire où se trouve la laïcité dans la république du Congo, les républiques de la Baltique, les Républiques autonomes de la Russie (Altaï, Bachkortostan, Daghestan, Tchétchénie, Carélie, Tatarstan, Komis, etc.), la République américaine, la République de lInde, et la République de Maurice.
Par linoubliable Méthode Coué, M. Meetarbhan veut à tout prix faire croire aux Mauriciens que Maurice est un état laïque (à la française) sans expliquer comment Mais les ( ) journalistes sont as clear as mud dans leur politique propagandiste de la laïcité.
Maurice est un état séculier (secular en anglais), et non laïque. La laïcité est une exception française, et le mot est intraduisible en anglais propre. La laïcité est un signe dune sécularisation de lEtat, mais un Etat séculier nest pas nécessairement laïque, tels lAngleterre, lInde, Maurice. Un laïc est un prêtre catholique qui nappartient pas au clergé. La laïcité est un terme emprunté à léglise catholique par les philosophes français comme Descartes, Voltaire, Montesquieu, pour combattre lemprise de léglise catholique sur lÉtat français, y compris lenseignement. Les circonstances propres à la France - sa centralisation, son catholicisme dÉtat, une église catholique qui continue ses procès de sorcellerie, une agriculture défaillante, son intolérance de Contre-Réforme - ont fait, dans ce pays, de la philosophie anticléricale. À ses origines, la politique de la laïcité ne concernait que le catholicisme. Ce nest que subséquemment que le colonialisme et lesclavagisme français essayèrent dimposer cette politique sur dautres pays souverains et dautres religions. Il nest alors pas surprenant que les journalistes des organes pro-français et francophiles veulent à tout prix imposer cette politique aux Mauriciens, surtout dans le contexte propagandiste de la créolité ou de la créolisation, termes issus de lesclavage. Labbé Philippe Fanchette avait tout à fait raison de dire : Il ne se laisse ni angoisser ni constiper par une théorie de la nation républicaine et laïque importée exclusivement de France et imposée aux seuls créoles (le Mauricien, 28 juillet 2001 - Pardonnez-nous, labbé )
Séculier vs laïque
La laïcité nadopte non-seulement pas de religion dEtat, comme le catholicisme durant la pré-Révolution française, mais elle ne reconnaît nonplus, au niveau de lEtat, aucune religion, aucun race, et aucune communauté. La laïcité est un principe intégrateur basé sur lathéisme et présuppose un peuple homogène dit citoyen, dont la citoyenneté, qui est un des fondements de la République post-révolution française, et sans aucune pertinence pour Maurice.
De lautre côté, séculier est aussi un principe politique qui nadopte pas de religion dEtat. Mais un système séculier reconnaît, au niveau de lEtat, toutes les religions, races et communautés, cultures.
Comme les Etats-Unis, lAngleterre et lInde, Maurice a un système politique séculier mais non laïque comme le prétendent certains journalistes fanatiques et extrémistes ( ) de Maurice.
M. Meetarbhan doit absolument sexpliquer plus en détails sur cette prétendue volonté du président SAJ de respecter le principe de laïcité auquel souscrivent les dits républicains, surtout, étant donné que le président de la République mauricienne nest que symbolique, nétant pas élu au suffrage universel. La présidence mauricienne actuelle nest quun jeu politique dans le partage non-démocratique du pouvoir. Si SAJ est président depuis septembre 2003, cest bien par arrangement (magouille, diraient les mauvaises langues) politique avec M. Paul Bérenger dans lalliance MSM-MMM pour que M. Bérenger puisse devenir Premier ministre, forçant ainsi la démission du willing ex-Président Offman après seulement une année de présidence, en dépit du fait quil ait prêté serment pour cinq ans. Sacrilège, diraient dautres ! Dans le contexte mauricien, où sont-elles ces valeurs républicaines que nous ressassent sans cesse nos journalistes politiciens ?
Où peut-on nous renseigner sur cette fameuse pensée républicaine de M. Meetarbhan? Est-ce vraiment une affaire dEtat si SAJ sadresse à la population le jour de Noël, la veille ou le lendemain, le jour du réveillon ou 24 heures avant (soit le 30 décembre) le nouvel an chrétien de lère chrétienne ? Dans la logique de M. Meetarbhan, le président SAJ ne devrait-il pas sadresser à la population de même, par exemple, 24 heures avant le nouvel an de lère islamique pour démontrer sa volonté de respecter le principe de laïcité ? Il est évident que M. Meetarbhan est très mal informé sur le concept de la laïcité et quil devrait se renseigner davantage avant décrire sur un sujet aussi complexe. Bien que la France se prétende laïque, il y a tellement de dérogations à cette laïcité française quon ne peut objectivement dire que la France est un pays laïque.
Le Ramayana, SAJ et la laïcité
Il est fort instructif de constater lindélicatesse de certains journalistes politiciens qui ne reculent devant rien, et déforment en toute impunité la vérité dans le but de manipuler lesprit et lignorance des Mauriciens et leur faire croire nimporte quelles divagations journalistiques. La déclaration de SAJ selon laquelle il aurait toujours gouverné Maurice selon les principes et valeurs du Ramayana est de notoriété publique. Selon lhebdomadaire Mauritius Times du 23 août 2002, SAJ and values of Ramayana: From then to now and beyond , Dilip Laxman écrit que SAJ understood and appreciated the full meaning of what he had said en déclarant que in running the affairs of the state he had always been guided by and followed the values enshrined in the Ramayana, considering them as the ideal: Rajneeti me Ramayana mera sabse bara adarsh rahi hai.
De la gestion économique de SAJ selon les principes de bhakti and shakti, à ses sacrifices tyaag ka raasta, en passant par le samaj ko jagaya, social awakening de Maurice et de son rajneeti, based on the precepts of Bhagwan Ram: maine hamesha apna vachan nibhaya aur janta ke soukh aur sammridhi ke liye kam kiya, tout respire le communalisme (communautarisme) et en aucun cas un quelconque esprit de laïcité comme le prétend Raj Meetarbhan !
Finalement, pour conclure, lÉtat français, de son côté, se sert dangereusement dune mauvaise définition de ce concept de laïcité afin de justifier ses propres préjugés et sa politique fascisante envers certaines langues, races, cultures et une religion en particulier, lislam. Le faux débat sur le port du hijaab (foulard porté par certaines musulmanes) et son interdiction est en violation flagrante des droits de lhomme (de la femme musulmane).
Article 9 - Liberté de pensée, de conscience et de religion (1)
1. Toute personne a droit à la liberté de pensée, de conscience et de religion ; ce droit implique la liberté de changer de religion ou de conviction, ainsi que la liberté de manifester sa religion ou sa conviction individuellement ou collectivement, en public ou en privé, par le culte, lenseignement, les pratiques et laccomplissement des rites.
2. La liberté de manifester sa religion ou ses convictions ne peut faire lobjet dautres restrictions que celles qui, prévues par la loi, constituent des mesures nécessaires, dans une société démocratique, à la sécurité publique, à la protection de lordre, de la santé ou de la morale publiques, ou à la protection des droits et libertés dautrui.
COUNCIL OF EUROPE - The European Convention on Human Rights - ROME 4 November 1950
LEtat mauricien est séculier, Dieu merci, et non laïque.
Rafic SOORMALLY Le 11 novembre 2004
Notes. M. Raj Meetarban est lassistant rédacteur (Deputy Editor) du quotidien lExpress. Jean Claude de lEstrac en est léditeur.
Sainte-Rita, l'église des animaux, sera démolie et ses fidèles expulsés
Sur la façade ensoleillée de la petite église catholique gallicane Sainte-Rita – un peu défraîchie depuis sa construction en 1900 – dans le 15e arrondissement parisien, la bannière fièrement tendue « Non à la démolition de la paroisse Sainte-Rita » semble défier la pancarte de permis de démolition qui jonche le parvis. Pourtant, ni Sainte-Rita, patronne des causes désespérées, ni la mobilisation active des fidèles n'auront pu empêcher la décision du tribunal administratif de Paris qui a rejeté, mardi 11 mars, le recours déposé par l'association de défense de Sainte-Rita contre la démolition et, par conséquent, l'expulsion des paroissiens. En lieu et place de l'église seront construits une vingtaine de logements sociaux et des parkings. Les occupants ont six mois, à compter de la notification du jugement, pour quitter les lieux.
Un drame pour les nombreux fidèles qui parcourent des centaines de kilomètres, chaque dimanche, accompagnés de leur chiens, chats, oiseaux, lapins ou furets pour se rendreà Sainte-Rita : la paroisse est l'une des rares, en France, à permettre la présence des animaux de compagnie durant l'office. Mais elle est encore plus célèbre pour sa bénédiction de tous les animaux, chaque premier dimanche de novembre lors de la messe de Saint-François d'Assise, patron des bêtes, qui attire presque un millier de fidèles. Lamas, dromadaires, zèbres, perroquets, singes et même tigres y ont été bénis par Mgr Dominique Philippe, archevêque catholique gallican de Paris qui officie depuis vingt-neuf ans à Sainte-Rita, hors de l'autorité du Vatican. Le religieux a repris l'édifice en 1988, alors que celui-ci était fermé depuis douze ans.
« C'ÉTAIT LE BON TEMPS »
Dans sa longue robe écrue, l'homme sourit en se remémorant le passage de François Hollande et de Ségolène Royal, il y a de ça « presque dix ans, lorsqu'ils étaient encore ensemble », pour une messe des chats. « Ils disaient adorer les chats et venaient voir s'ils pouvaient en adopter », s'amuse Mgr Philippe. « C'était le bon temps ».
Car les ennuis ont commencé il y a deux ans lorsque le propriétaire de l'époque, l'association cultuelle des Chapelles catholiques et apostoliques, a entamé une procédure d'expulsion des occupants – demandant à la justice de résilier le bail accordé à la communauté qui occupe l'église –, avant de vendrele lieuà un promoteur immobilier nantais, Loceane. Le bâtiment, non classé, est jugé sans intérêt patrimonial ou architectural par la commission du Vieux Paris, qui rend des avis sur le patrimoine et l'urbanisme de la capitale. Le permis de démolir est alors délivré.
« Nous nous interrogeons sur la recevabilité de la demande [d'expulsion] de l'association », a réagi lors de l'audience Me Jean-Marc Fedida, avocat de Sainte-Rita. « Nous demandons à ce que toute la clarté soit faite sur les conditions dans lesquelles elle continue à se prétendre propriétaire d'un bien immobilier pour lequel un promoteur a déposé et obtenu un permis de construire », a-t-il ajouté.
ENJEU DES MUNICIPALES Le maire du 15e arrondissement, Philippe Goujon (UMP), candidat à sa propre succession aux municipales de mars, s'est toujours positionné contre la démolition, au nom de la protection du patrimoine culturel du quartier. « Cette église néogothique est un marqueur de l'identité du quartier, je ne comprends pas qu'on puisse vouloir y construire des logements sociaux à la place », déclare au Monde celui qui tâcle la politique« bétonneuse » de Mme Hidalgo dans le 15e. L'édile dit n'avoir reçu aucune réponse du maire de Paris, qu'il avait saisi sur le cas de Sainte-Rita. Il s'est ensuite adressé à la direction régionale des affaires culturelles (DRAC) pour qu'elle attribue au bâtiment le label: « Patrimoine culturel du XXe siècle ». A l'occasion des municipales de mars, les autres candidats dans le 15e arrondissement se sont aussi prononcés sur la question. Le numéro deux sur la liste d'Anne Hidalgo, Claude Dargent, s'est déclaré, selon Paris Tribune,« favorable au principe d'une opération de logements sur cette parcelle là (…) Sainte Rita est une église qui relève d'un culte qui n'est pas l'église catholique (…) qui n'entre [donc] pas dans la loi de 1905 ».
APPEL À BILL GATES OU AU QATAR L'enjeu électoral semble dépasser Mgr Dominique Philippe. Le religieux a toujours été conscient qu'il n'avait pas les moyens de réunir les 3,3 millions d'euros nécessaires au rachat des lieux. Résigné plutôt qu'irascible, il préfère préparer la suite et espère trouver les fonds pour acheter un local abordable sur Paris. « Rien d'accessible pour l'instant », déplore-t-il. De quoi commencerà sérieusement s'inquiéter pour le devenir des trente mariages prévus d'ici l'été. « Des américains, des japonais, des chinois veulent se marier chez nous. Que va-t-on faire ? », s'interroge-t-il. Sans compter la célèbre messe des motards, chaque été.
Mais la décision du tribunal n'arrêtera sûrement pas François Lusinchi, président de l'Association Paroisse Sainte-Rita qui, quelques heures avant son rendu, croyait encore en la possibilité de racheter la paroisse grâce à un large appel au don sur Internet. « Quelques personnes anonymes ont déjà envoyé des chèques de 500€ après avoir entendu parler de notre situation », s'étonne presque Mgr Dominique Philippe.
Si les dons ne suffisent pas, François Lusinchi assure qu'il fera appel à d'autres généreux donateurs : « Je me suis renseigné pour faire appel à la fondation de Bill Gates ou pour demander de l'aide au Qatar : ils ont racheté le PSG, ils peuvent bien racheter une église à 3 millions ». Pour ce paroissien qui parcourt 15 kilomètres chaque dimanche avec Venus, son caniche, pour assisterà l'office, démolir Sainte-Rita et y établir un immeuble à la place reviendrait à « tuer toute l'âme du village qu'est la rue François-Bonvin », qui perdrait ainsi « son cachet ».
« Nous n'allons pas nous laisser faire et allons faire appel de la décision qui porte atteinte à notre liberté religieuse », a-t-il ensuite déclaré. Une manifestation de soutien qui rassemblera fidèles et animaux est prévue le 15 mars sur le parvis de l'Hôtel de ville.
En savoir plus sur http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2014/03/12/sainte-rita-l-eglise-des-animaux-sera-demolie_4381245_3224.html#FHojq5CiyI121IDF.99
UK PRIEST'S LETTER TO AN ANTI-ISLAM, ANTI-ARAB, ANT-ARABIC AND ANTI-MUSLIM RACIST - A MISISLAMIST!
From Muhammad Al-Massari
PRIEST'S LETTER TO AN ISLAMOPHOBE
Letter from a Catholic Priest in UK about Islam-o-phobia in Europe . FATHER FRANK GELLI. 29 October 2009
Open Letter to Islam-o-phobe Dutch MP Geert Wilders
Dear Mr Wilders,
They say you can only take a horse to the water, you can't make it drink. But human beings are not horses. Unlike animals, they can be reasoned with. I offer these few remarks in the faint hope you are amenable to reason. It is about your recent speech to the Alliance of Patriots in New York .In which you paint an apocalyptic picture of `the Islamization of Europe '. You describe some European cities with Muslim neighbourhoods in lurid terms. It is a world `where women walk around in figureless tents...Their husbands, or slave holders, if you prefer, walk three steps ahead'. Mr Wilders, I live bang near one of those areas in West London .
I often visit Whitechapel and Edgware Road – parts of our colourful Londonistan - I have never seen a Muslim woman walking behind her husband. Rather, the mothers stroll about in a proud, dignified manner,alongside the men. Nothing in their behaviour suggests a subordinate role, let alone slavery. And there are tons of lively, even feisty Muslim girls wearing all sorts of gear.True, they may not, as a rule, behave like permissive, liberated females, baring the flesh, hugging and kissing partners in public, no. I would even guess most of them don't sleep with boys before marriage. But since when are chastity, modesty and self-restraint so bad? The traditional, Christian mores of the Western civilisation which you claim to uphold used to prize such things, no?
'25 per cent of the population of Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now'.Lies, damned lies and statistics, someone said.. But if you want native Europeans to stay numerically supreme, how about encouraging them to have more children? To urge them not to use contraceptives, the pills? To give up abortion? To bolster family values?
Stop bashing Islam. Embrace the Christian religion in its conservative, sound traditions and all will be kosher.`Thousands of mosques across Europe . With larger congregations than churches', you notice. Well, whose fault is that? Do perhaps Muslims stand at church doors, stopping the eager faithful from worshipping the Lord? Me thinks you should rather address yourself to Christians. `Look at Muslims' you should say. `Look at how many regularly pray. How keen they are on the observances of their religion. You should do the same.' Exactly.The flourishing of mosques across Europe should serve as a stimulus to Christians. A window of opportunity. As an urgent reminder to get back to their vital, life-giving roots – the worship of the One True God. Why blame pious Muslims for the faults of lukewarm or nominal Christians, eh?
In Amsterdam `gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims'. Awful, if true. Funnily enough, I recall the words of Pym Fortuyn, the gay right-wing politician murdered by a fanatic. `I have nothing against Moroccans – I have slept with so many of them.'
The history of the Holocaust can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.' How bizarre. First, a godson of mine has been to Auschwitz , on a school trip. Part of a programme to learn about wartime horrors. School curricula in Britain do in fact include projects about WWII and persecutions of Jews and other people. London's Imperial War Museum has a holocaust section, which I viewed just the other day. What's more, TV channels force-feed viewers with a daily, obsessive dose of films and programmes about the war and Germany 's crimes.If anybody should complain about this state of affairs, it should be Germans. It fuels Germanophobia, the lurking, masochistic
English vice. Do today's Germans deserve such constant pilloring? After all, isn't Germany amongst the strongest supporters of your beloved state of Israel ?
The Prophet Muhammad. Had he been `a man of peace...like Gandhi and Mother Teresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was...' I won't quote the rest, as it would be distasteful.
Muhammad certainly did not found a religion like the Quakers, no. And he is definitely different from figures like Buddha and Jesus. However, why you did not compare him to a prophet and lawgiver like Moses? Muhammad had the Jewish tribes of Banu Qurayza slaughtered, you write. Well, Exodus 32:25 has Moses ordering the Levites to slay those who had worshipped the Golden Calf, about 3000 men.`Today you have ordained yourselves for the service of the Lord' Moses told the slayers. Hardly like Gandhi, would you agree. You are silent about Moses, I suspect, because in your speech you wrapped yourself in the mantle of defender of Israel . Mr Wilders, this Anglican priest is opposed to the destruction of the state of Israel . Because I am a Christian, Jews are rather important to me. I support both a Jewish state and a Palestinian state. A modest-sized Jewish Vatican in the Holy Land is the realistic solution.
Bernard Wasserstein's thoughtful book, `Israel & Palestine' points the way. Wasserstein shows how your fantasy of Israel as a heroic outpost of the West against the incoming Jihad is nonsense. Indeed, Israeli society today needs immigrants as much as Europe does. And they won't be Jewish immigrants.
Despite your astonishing garbage about rising anti-Semitism in France (headed by a Jewish President!), Jews worldwide are happy where they are- they not migrating to Israel – or should I say Isra-hell', as my Israeli friend Ronen once wrote?
Ok, you don't like Muslims. Yet they are not going to go away. Your case is analogous to that of the man whose garden was infested by ladybirds. They were everywhere. He didn't like them. He tried several methods to get rid of them. Sprays, insecticides, this and that. Nothing worked. The ladybirds kept being around. Indeed, they multiplied. The guy was getting obsessed with them, growing paranoid, bitter, haunted. Eventually, he sent an e-mail to a wise old friend, an experienced gardener: `What should I do about the damned ladybirds?' The reply came: `I suggest you learn to love them'.
PROMOTING HIS SON DYLAN FOR HIS POLITICAL ZIONIST CAREER???
Michael's Zionist father Kirk Douglas is 97 years old! GOD BLESS HIS SOUL! But, what kind of "JUDAISM" did he find and adopt near the end of or after his career had ended?
Michael Douglas Reveals Anti-Semitic Attack On His Son
Though the 70-year-old actor was not raised Jewish, his father Kirk Douglas is (?), and Dylan had been exploring the religion. (???)
He was wearing a Star of David necklace when the incident happened.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
In an opinion piece written by Douglas for the New York Times, Douglas said that he told his son: “Dylan, you just had your first taste of anti-Semitism.”
Dylan had returned to the family’s hotel room visibly upset after visiting the swimming pool, upon which a man had ‘hurled abuse at him’ for no reason.
“I stared at him. And suddenly I had an awful realization of what might have caused the man’s outrage: Dylan was wearing a Star of David.” he writes.
“After calming him down, I went to the pool and asked the attendants to point out the man who had yelled at him.
“We talked. It was not a pleasant discussion. (???)
“Afterward, I sat down with my son and said: ‘Dylan, you just had your first taste of anti-Semitism.’”
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Douglas goes on to say that he too had encountered casual anti-semitic behaviour while in high school.
“A friend saw someone Jewish walk by, and with no provocation he confidently told me: ‘Michael, all Jews cheat in business.’
“’What are you talking about?’ I said. ‘Michael, come on,’ he replied. ‘Everyone knows that.’
“With little knowledge of what it meant to be a Jew (???), I found myself passionately defending the Jewish people (???). Now, half a century later, I have to defend my son. Anti-Semitism, I’ve seen, is like a disease that goes dormant, flaring up with the next political trigger.”
He goes on: “So that is our challenge in 2015, and all of us must take it up. Because if we confront anti-Semitism whenever we see it, if we combat it individually and as a society, and use whatever platform we have to denounce it, we can stop the spread of this madness. (???)
“My son is strong. He is fortunate to live in a country where anti-Semitism is rare. But now he too has learned of the dangers that he as a Jew must face. It’s a lesson that I wish I didn’t have to teach him, a lesson I hope he will never have to teach his children.”
Is wearing a "Star of David" a Jewish or a Zionist practice ?
Was the unprovoked and cowardly attack againgst the Jewish religion?
Was not the "attack" a cowardly action? Was the Police not notified? Why not name the "Southern European" country? AND THERE ARE PLENTY MORE!
BAFS
LOS ANGELES TIMES
Op-Ed
Michael Douglas finds Judaism and faces anti-Semitism
By Michael Douglas
A half-century after I defended the Jewish people, I had to defend my son
Anti-Semitism is like a disease that goes dormant, flaring up with the next political trigger
Last summer our family went to Southern Europe on holiday. During our stay at a hotel, our son Dylan went to the swimming pool. A short time later he came running back to the room, upset. A man at the pool had started hurling insults at him. My first instinct was to ask, “Were you misbehaving?” “No,” Dylan told me through his tears. I stared at him. And suddenly I had an awful realization of what might have caused the man's outrage: Dylan was wearing a Star of David. After calming him down, I went to the pool and asked the attendants to point out the man who had yelled at him. We talked. It was not a pleasant discussion. Afterward, I sat down with my son and said: “Dylan, you just had your first taste of anti-Semitism.”
My father, Kirk Douglas, born Issur Danielovitch, is Jewish. My mother, Diana, is not. I had no formal religious upbringing from either of them, and the two kids I have with Catherine Zeta-Jones are like me, growing up with one parent who is Jewish and one who is not. Several years ago Dylan, through his friends, developed a deep connection to Judaism, and when he started going to Hebrew school and studying for his bar mitzvah, I began to reconnect with the religion of my father. While some Jews believe that not having a Jewish mother makes me not Jewish, I have learned the hard way that those who hate do not make such fine distinctions. Dylan's experience reminded me of my first encounter with anti-Semitism, in high school. A friend saw someone Jewish walk by, and with no provocation he confidently told me: “Michael, all Jews cheat in business.” “What are you talking about?” I said.
“Michael, come on,” he replied. “Everyone knows that.” With little knowledge of what it meant to be a Jew, I found myself passionately defending the Jewish people. Now, half a century later, I have to defend my son. Anti-Semitism, I've seen, is like a disease that goes dormant, flaring up with the next political trigger. :: In my opinion there are three reasons anti-Semitism is appearing now with renewed vigilance. The first is that historically, it always grows more virulent whenever and wherever the economy is bad. In a time when income disparity is growing, when hundreds of millions of people live in abject poverty, some find Jews to be a convenient scapegoat rather than looking at the real source of their problems.
A second root cause of anti-Semitism derives from an irrational and misplaced hatred of Israel. Far too many people see Israel as an apartheid state and blame the people of an entire religion for what, in truth, are internal national-policy decisions. Does anyone really believe that the innocent victims in that kosher shop in Paris and at that bar mitzvah in Denmark had anything to do with Israeli-Palestinian policies or the building of settlements 2,000 miles away? The third reason is simple demographics. Europe is now home to 25 million to 30 million Muslims, twice the world's entire Jewish population. Within any religious community that large, there will always be an extremist fringe, people who are radicalized and driven with hatred, while rejecting what all religions need to preach — respect, tolerance and love. We're now seeing the amplified effects of that small, radicalized element. With the Internet, its virus of hatred can now speed from nation to nation, helping fuel Europe's new epidemic of anti-Semitism.It is time for each of us to speak up against this hate.
Speaking up is the responsibility of our political leaders. French Prime Minister Manuel Valls has made it clear that anti-Semitism violates the morals and spirit of France and that violent anti-Semitic acts are a crime against all French people that must be confronted, combated and stopped. He challenged his nation to tell the world: Without its Jews, France would no longer be France. Speaking up is the responsibility of our religious leaders, and Pope Francis has used his powerful voice to make his position and that of the Catholic Church clear, saying: “It's a contradiction that a Christian is anti-Semitic. His roots are Jewish. Let anti-Semitism be banished from the heart and life of every man and every woman.”
In New York, Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan is well-known for building a bridge to the Jewish community. His words and actions and the pope's are evidence of the reconciliation between two major religions, an inspiring example of how a past full of persecution and embedded hostility can be overcome. It's also the responsibility of regular citizens to take action. In Oslo, members of the Muslim community joined their fellow Norwegians to form a ring of peace at a local synagogue. Such actions give me hope — they send a message that together, we can stand up to hatred of the Jewish people. So that is our challenge in 2015, and all of us must take it up. Because if we confront anti-Semitism whenever we see it, if we combat it individually and as a society, and use whatever platform we have to denounce it, we can stop the spread of this madness. My son is strong. He is fortunate to live in a country where anti-Semitism is rare. But now he too has learned of the dangers that he as a Jew must face. It's a lesson that I wish I didn't have to teach him, a lesson I hope he will never have to teach his children. Michael Douglas, award-winning actor/producer and United Nations messenger of peace, received the 2015 Genesis Prize, which honors "exceptional people whose values and achievements will inspire the next generation of Jews."
While U.S. Main Stream Media continues to fail and provide “We The People” anything of value to confirm and buttress our democracy, today Free Speech TV frankly kicked their ass taking huge giant leap forward for democracy and justice airing America’s # 1 prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi’s documentary “The Prosecution of An American President“.
Famed and esteemed U.S. Veteran, Charles Manson prosecutor, and New York Times bestselling author Vincent Bugliosi makes the most powerful, explosive and thought-provoking argument of his storied career.
In The Prosecution of an American President, Bugliosi presents a meticulously researched legal case that proves George W. Bush took our nation to war in Iraq under false pretenses and is therefore, under the law, guilty of murder for the deaths of 4,500 young American soldiers who fought and died there.
Bush’s unlawful war also cost the United States more than a trillion dollars; alienated many of our allies; caused the deaths of more than 100,000 innocent Iraqi men, women, and children; and pushed a previously tranquil nation into unending civil war, atrocities and chaos. (some estimates say the deaths are closer to over 1,000,000)
As a prosecutor dedicated to seeking justice, Bugliosi delivers a non-partisan argument based on hard facts and pure objectivity. This searing indictment also outlines a legally credible pathway to holding our highest government officials accountable for their actions, thereby creating a framework for future occupants of the Oval Office. Ultimately, Bugliosi calls for the United States to return to the great nation it once was.
Best-selling author Vincent Bugliosi has written the most important and thought-provoking book of his prolific career. In a meticulously researched and clearly presented legal case that puts George W. Bush on trial for murder after he leaves his presidency, Bugliosi delivers a searing indictment of the president and his administration. With what he believes is overwhelming evidence that President Bush took the nation to war in Iraq under false pretenses – a war that has caused great loss of life, cost this nation close to $1 trillion, and alienated most of our allies in the Western world – Bugliosi argues that it is George W. Bush who must be held accountable for what Bugliosi considers to be monumental crimes. In this groundbreaking book, Bugliosi, in his inimitable style, presents a powerful case against the man in the oval office.
Free Speech TV is proud to announce that they will be airing Prosecution of an American President on the following, upcoming dates. This is MUST SEE TV and should be required viewing for every school in the nation and the world. So make sure to tune in two nights in a row to see the film in its entirety. For additional dates and times, check out the Free Speech TV schedule.
Johnny Punish is a global citizen, visionary, musician, artist, entertainer, businessman, investor, life coach, and syndicated columnist. He is also the founder and President of the Middle East Union Congress; a non-profit global think tank dedicated to building a new Middle East for the 21st century.
![operation_cast_lead[1]](http://quenelplus.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/operation_cast_lead1.jpg)
Clik here to view.