Quantcast
Channel: MUHAMMAD ALI BEN MARCUS
Viewing all 755 articles
Browse latest View live

MARION SIGAUT, HISTORIENNE; DR SALIM LAIBI, LIBRE PENSEUR; ALAIN SORAL, ESSAYISTE., VOLTAIRE, FAUX CUL.

0
0
MARION SIGAUT, HISTORIENNE.
DR SALIM LAIBI, LIBRE PENSEUR.
ALAIN SORAL, ESSAYISTE.
"VOLTAIRE", FAUX CUL!

Marion Sigaut - les lumières, un antihumanisme

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72aFDjwi9Pg

Marion Sigaut - 1789 n'a jamais été la révolte du Peuple !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=actI18L8_Qo


Alain Soral / vidéo du mois : conseils de lecture - Octobre 2014

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_G7YTVDBLU



LASHA DARKMOON - CHINA AND JEWISH DOMINATION OF US AMERICA

0
0

China and the Jews

Published originally on Veterans Today

What do the Chinese think about Jewish world domination?
How would they like to be next on the hit list?

Part 1: On Domination Games

1 

A new article by Kevin MacDonald on China is well worth reading. The article begins with these words: “Tablet  [magazine] has an article reflecting Jewish angst over the possibility that the Chinese might think that Jews run America: The Chinese Believe That the Jews Control America: Is That a Good Thing?

MacDonald then goes on to give an extensive quote by the author of the Tablet magazine article, Clarissa Sebag-Montefiore (pictured), in which the young Jewish writer does her best to pooh-pooh the whole idea that Jews control America.
When someone with the name “Sebag-Montefiore” pens an article, the world has to sit up and pay attention. This is because the Montefiores belong to one of the most venerated Jewish families in England—the crème de la crème of British Jewry—the other great Jewish families in England being the Rothschilds, the Sassoons, the Freuds, the Joels, the Neubergers, and the Harts.
Ms Sebag-Montefiore is clearly at pains to convince the Chinese—who she knows will be reading her article with avid interest—that any such idea of Jewish power in America is a malicious anti-Semitic canard.
The Jews, she would like to persuade the Chinese, have at best a marginal influence on American affairs. True, it’s often alleged by people who ought to know better that Jews own the media and Hollywood, but these silly assertions have to be taken with a pinch of salt. The Chinese, with their high intelligence, will see through these specious claims—or, in Ms Sebag-Montefiore’s predictable parlance, “entrenched stereotypes.”
Henry Ford would of course have another view on all this. Writing almost 100 years ago, he said: “Controlling the world’s sources of news, Jews can always prepare the minds of people for their next move.

2-a

Here is Ms Sebag-Montefiore doing her valiant best to persuade the Chinese into viewing the Jews through rose-tinted Jewish spectacles:
“Do the Jews Really Control America?” asked one Chinese newsweekly headline in 2009. The factoids [note the dismissive word “factoids”]  doled out in such articles and in books about Jews in China—for example: “The world’s wealth is in Americans’ pockets; Americans are in Jews’ pockets”—would rightly be seen to be alarming in other contexts. But in China, where Jews are widely perceived as clever and accomplished, they are meant as compliments.
Scan the shelves in any bookstore in China and you are likely to find best-selling self-help books based on Jewish knowledge. Most focus on how to make cash. Titles range from 101 Money Earning Secrets From Jews’ Notebooks to Learn To Make Money With the Jews.”
And now for the flattery: the attempt to prove that Jews and Chinese are kindred spirits under the flesh, united by common ideals and noble aspirations:
“The Chinese recognize, and embrace, common characteristics between their culture and Jewish culture. Both races have a large diaspora spread across the globe. Both place emphasis on family, tradition, and education. Both boast civilizations that date back thousands of years. In Shanghai, I am often told with nods of approval that I must be intelligent, savvy, and quick-witted, simply because of my ethnicity.”
Without waiting to finish the article—I was to race through it later that day—I posted this comment on my website:
“Though it is obvious to all of us that the Jews control America, it astonishes me that they still keep pretending they don’t! They appear to be concerned right now that the Chinese might get the “wrong idea” that they control America! They would obviously like to dupe the Chinese into thinking they are pretty harmless.”
To this comment I received a thought-provoking response from writer Franklin Ryckaert, a veteran commenter on Kevin MacDonald’s The Occidental Observer: “It wouldn’t astonish you if you knew about what is called ‘aggressive mimicry’, which is defined thusly : ‘Aggressive mimicry is a form of mimicry in which predators, parasites or parasitoids share similar signals with a harmless model, allowing them to avoid being correctly identified by their prey or host.’” (See here)
“Jews are parasites who want to exploit, control and eventually destroy their host,” Ryckaert went on to explain, “but because they are everywhere a small minority they must resort to certain strategies so as not to be identified and expelled.
First of all they do that by hiding their identity (assuming non-Jewish names, “converting” to another religion etc.) and by staying as much as possible in the background (as “adviser” of a leading figure but not as the leader himself). Secondly they project the image of themselves as harmless, powerless or even as oppressed and persecuted. Hence the stress on the Holocaust story.
This is why the Jews don’t want to be seen by the Chinese as in total control of America. China is their next host and they need to be seen as harmless.”
Ms Sebag-Montefiore’s entire article founders on that one withering sentence: “CHINA IS THEIR NEXT HOST AND THEY NEED TO BE SEEN AS HARMLESS.” A penetrating comment, without a doubt, though not exactly flattering to our Jewish cousins.
I replied:
“Well, let’s hope the Chinese are smart enough to avoid the fate of the Americans. America is now little more than a slave colony dominated by Jews. That the Americans were unable to learn from history—from the complete takeover of Germany and Russia by the Bolshevik brigade—is a sad reflection on the American character.
Didn’t they see it coming? If they did, it seems they weren’t too bothered: like the English who threw in the towel long ago and were quite happy to accept serfdom under the Jews: (a) provided it was dressed up as “democracy”, and (b) provided the loot was divided up in such a way that the gentile aristocracy were not excluded from a place at the pig’s trough.
The Brits and the Americans, you could say, were willing to make a Faustian pact with the Jews: that as long as the Jews made a certain percentage of them rich, letting them be part and parcel of the predator elite, there would be no complaints. Hollywood is a case in point, and wherever celebrities like Madonna are manufactured. Fabulous wealth is showered upon these non-Jewish degenerates as long as they serve their elite masters faithfully.
I’m not sure the Chinese will be any more successful than our Western countries in resisting the wiles of the Jews. Bribery and blackmail may well do the trick. The important thing is to keep the masses sedated. As long as the slaves are allowed to think they are in control and are made to enjoy their slavery, life will go on.
This quote by Aldous Huxley says it all:
“A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.”
Franklin Ryckaert agreed. He expressed the hope that the Chinese, for their own sakes, would be a bit smarter than the dopey Americans who had allowed themselves to be sold down the river.
“We can only hope that the Chinese will be able to avoid being corrupted by the Jews. Their high intelligence, realism and traditional values might be of help, but we must also keep in mind that they already have been once victims of the destructive ideology of Communism, which is Jewish after all. Under Communism the Chinese repudiated their traditional values, condemned Confucianism as “feudal” and during Mao’s Cultural Revolution even destroyed centuries old art treasures. If one Jewish ideology could subvert them once, another one could do it for a second time.
§
Kevin MacDonald goes on to quote Ms Sebag-Montefiore again, this time about media control. She seems inordinately anxious to persuade the Chinese that the whole concept of Jewish control over the media is an anti-Semitic canard to which even the Chinese (sigh sigh) appear to have succumbed.
“Just before my visit to Nanjing,” she points out plaintively, “the Chinese tycoon Chen Guangbiao made international headlines by publicly announcing his ambitions to buy the New York Times and later the Wall Street Journal. In a TV interview he explained that he would be an ideal newspaper magnate because “I am very good at working with Jews”—who, he said, controlled the media.
“Who, he said, controlled the media.”
CHINESE PHILANTHROPIST CHEN GUANGBIAO handing out money to street cleaners in Nanking
Chinese philanthropist Chen Guangbiao handing out money to street cleaners in Nanking
Note the cunning way that’s put. Poor Chen, it seems to suggest, has somehow gotten the silly idea that Jews control the American media! Where on earth did he get such a bizarre idea from? Oy veh, do grow up already Mr Chen, you silly-billy Chinese billionaire!
The flamboyantly generous Chen Guangbiao (pictured), one of China’s 400 richest men, flew into America a year ago and announced to everyone’s surprise his wish to buy up the New York Times. Apparently the Jewish shareholders refused even to meet him to discuss the proposition and his bid was scorned (cartoon pic).
He then said he wanted to buy up the Wall Street Journalanother Jewish-owned newspaper. With engaging chutzpah, he had said he would like to give these Zionist papers “more balance”— a comment which doubtless caused considerable alarm in cosmopolitan circles.
Failing to make any headway in acquiring unbalanced American newspapers, Cheng finally consoled himself with throwing a slap-up lunch in Central Park for 250 homeless New Yorkers
A pity the Chinese billionaire was not allowed to give “more balance” to the Jew-owned mass media by smashing through their monopoly—something that has led to the complete zionization of America in an Israelified police state and the crippling psychological jewification of the American people.

JEWISH MEDIA CONTROL

Zionist Media(2)

 Here is a famous quote from the Protocols of the Elders of Zion on Jewish media control, a book which acclaimed Norwegian Professor Johan Galtung, author of 100 books and more than 1000 scholarly papers, heartily recommends to readers in spite of its reputation as a “forgery”.  (See here).  Galtung was particularly impressed by this quote on the Jewish stranglehold over the media:
“Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies …. These agencies will then be entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them. If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the goy communities to such an extent that they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the coloured glasses of those spectacles we are putting astride their nose.” (Protocol 12)
Kevin MacDonald concludes his essay on China with a veiled warning to the Chinese not to pay too much attention to Jewish doubletalk, as represented by the honeyed phrases dripping from the pen of the lovely Ms Sebag-Montefiore.
“Honest discussions of Jewish power and influence—whether it’s the Israel Lobby, Hollywood and the media, Wall Street, or immigration and multiculturalism—are to be made off limits, not only in the U.S., where there is an elaborate, lavishly funded infrastructure to ensure it, but also in China where Jewish money is already having a major effect on the boundaries of legitimate discussion.
China as a rising power would do well to view Jews through the lens of realism and empirically based discussion. As elsewhere, however, there are already forces that are pushing in the opposite direction.”
§
We have so far devoted this essay to the prospect of a Jewish takeover of China. The entire idea, admittedly, seems ridiculous on the surface. Ms Sebag-Montefiore would turn up her nose and dismiss it all as a “wild-eyed conspiracy theory.” She has been at great pains, as we have pointed out, to persuade the Chinese that if Jews should ever come to China in ever-increasing quantities in the foreseeable future they will be doing so as friendly and altruistic do-gooders.
Never mind that every single country to which the Jews came in the past was beset with innumerable problems soon after their arrival.. Never mind that they have been expelled from 109 locations from the year AD 250. Never mind that they have been perceived and stigmatized throughout history as unmitigated pests. Never mind that over 60 millions Russian Christians were put to death by them in the Soviet Union under Lenin and Stalin in the gulags and cheka dungeons. Never mind that they have now taken over America. This time it will be different. Totally different.
But wait—hold on!—perhaps we need not worry too much about the Chinese being taken over. It seems they are already aware of the Jewish bid for world domination. Far from being unduly concerned about being taken over, some of them have already begun to talk about modeling Chinese behavior on Jewish strategies for attaining wealth and power.
They want to study the Talmud, incredibly, to see if the wise rabbis of ancient times have any hot tips on how to make them as stinking rich as the Jews! And while they are about it, why not make a close study of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion to see what ingenious ideas these clever Jews have to offer on World Domination? :)
It sounds almost like a Swiftian satire. Enough to give the genteel Ms Sebag-Montefiore a fainting fit. Heck, if the Jews can take over America, why can’t we Chinese have a bash at it too!
Here is Professor Xu Xin addressing an American audience. Listen to him carefully. Is he serious or is he pulling our legs?
“I think it is obvious that Jews control the Western world. They run your media, universities, and much of your government. They tell you who to wage war on, who to fight, who to support and how to spend your money. This is what we Chinese want to understand when we study Jewish dominance and hegemony of the West.
There are literally so many instances of how you have fallen for Jewish tricks. Hitler was the last person to openly contest Jewish rule  and look how he is viewed. He is hated because of what Jews taught you with their films and books.
We Chinese are amused at how gullible white men are. We want to find the same way to shape your thoughts. This is why we study them, the Jews.”
— See “Chinese Academic Says China Using Jewish Model to Take Over United States & West.”
Fun times ahead. What with the Jews chatting up China, like the Big Bad Wolf playing nice with Goldilocks … and with the Chinese half-jokingly planning to study the Talmud and the Protocols with a view to taking over America from the Jews.

 PART  2: Opium, Sex and Death

mcd_mwh2005_0618377115_p369_f01
It is a sad and sobering fact that the Jews are already deeply entrenched in China and have been been so for centuries. As an erudite China watcher on my site was quick to point out recently, the sinofication of Jewish names was already underway during the time of the Ming Emperors several centuries ago:
“During the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644), a Ming emperor conferred seven surnames upon the Jews, by which they are identifiable today: Ai (艾), Shi (石), Gao (高), Jin (金), Li (李), Zhang (張), and Zhao (趙); sinofications of the original seven Jewish clans’ family names: Ezra, Shimon, Cohen, Gilbert, Levy, Joshua, and Jonathan, respectively. Interestingly, two of these, Jin and Shi, are the equivalent of common Jewish names in the west: Gold and Stone. (See here)
Jews had in fact arrived in India via the Silk Road almost 1000 years ago, well before Marco Polo made his way to the Court of the Grand Cam (Khan) in distant Cathay (China) in the late 13th century. Waves of Jews were to follow them in subsequent centuries until China finally acquired its own thoroughly assimilated Jews, the Kaifeng Jews, indistinguishable from the Chinese. Iraqi Jews, Jews taking flight from Russia, Jews fleeing the Nazis in their tens of thousands, all these came flooding into great melting pot of Shanghai.
There were even high-profile Jews in the Chinese Communist Party, including the American Jew Sidney Rittenberg and the journalist Israel Epstein. (See here)
The shameful opium trade in China, into which the easily corrupted Brits were drawn by Rothschild money, was in fact the brainchild of a British sephardic Jew, Elias David Sassoon. He was joined in this ignoble enterprise by another British Jew, Silas Aaron Hardoon, his partner in the firm E.D. Sassoon & Co.
The origin of the conflict between China and the Rothschild-backed East India Company—i.e., the Jew-ridden nucleus of the British Empire—can  be found in this bland statement about the First Opium War:
“In the 17th and 18th centuries, the demand for Chinese goods (particularly silk, porcelain, and tea) in the European market created a trade imbalance because the market for Western goods in China was virtually non-existent; China was largely self-sufficient and Europeans were not allowed access to China’s interior….
The British East India Company had a matching monopoly of British trade. [It]  began to auction opium grown on its plantations in India to independent foreign traders in exchange for silver.
The opium was then transported to the China coast and sold to Chinese middlemen who retailed the drug inside China. This reverse flow of silver and the increasing numbers of opium addicts alarmed Chinese officials.”
To deconstruct and simplify:
Europe wanted tea, silk and porcelain from China, but China was self-sufficient and needed nothing in exchange from Europe. The result was a trade deficit in which Britain (via its East India Company) owed China an enormous and increasing amount of silver.
How did Britain try to solve this tricky problem? It left it to the Jews who formed the nucleus of the East India Company to come up with a neat solution.
The East India Company began to grow opium on its Indian plantations. It then transported  the processed opium to Bombay and Calcutta where the crop was sold by auction to “independent foreign traders.” This innocuous phrase—“independent foreign traders”—needs translation. It is of course a euphemism for Jewish merchants.
There were not only swarms of British and European Jews in India at this time, concentrated mostly in the port cities of Bombay and Calcutta, but an entire community of Indian Jews: namely, the Cochin or Malabar Jews (see this picture) who had made their home at the southernmost tip of India from earliest antiquity.
The Jewish merchants who had bought the opium in India then shipped it to China on their opium clippers where it was exchanged for silver from “Chinese middlemen”—most of whom were Kaifeng (Chinese) Jews—another fact that has been carefully concealed by our politically correct court historians. These Chinese Jews thereupon proceeded to distribute the opium all over China, causing an epidemic of opium addiction among Chinese of all classes, ranging from the elite landowners and mandarins to the lowest coolies and rickshaw pullers.
CHINESE  OPIUM  DEN
CHINESE OPIUM DEN
As for the silver received from the sale of the opium, this not only helped to narrow the British trade deficit with China but enriched the East India Company’s vast army of officials, many of them Jews.
This, then, is how the British Empire became so powerful: by winning two Opium Wars with the help of Rothschild money. (The First Opium War: 1839-1842; the Second Opium War: 1856-1860). The Brits grew rich on Chinese tea, Chinese silk, Chinese porcelain, and acquired Hong Kong on a 99-year lease. And on this they built their Empire, with the help of the mercantile Jews.
What did China get in exchange? — Millions of opium addicts. By 1905, it has been calculated, 27 percent of Chinese males had become addicted to opium, with “13.5 million people consuming 39,000 tons of opium yearly.”  
When we look back at the British Empire, and the part played by Jews in bringing it to the pinnacles of wealth and power, we  cannot but help reflecting on Balzac’s famous epigram: “Behind every great fortune lies a great crime.”
OPIUM WAREHOUSE IN INDIA
OPIUM WAREHOUSE IN INDIA (c. 1850)
This iconic image of an opium warehouse is a lithograph produced by Bengal Commissioner Lt. Col. Walter S. Sherwill. The production and distribution center was located in Patna, India. Here 13 million pounds of opium juice were processed in giant vats and compacted into sticky, melon-sized balls (see picture above), the workmen being expected to roll 100 balls a day. These were then placed in chests and sent to Bombay and Calcutta, from where they were shipped out to Canton in China. (For more details, see here)
Here is a map showing the route from the opium warehouses in Bombay and Calcutta to Canton in China. And here is a chart showing the huge growth of British opium exports to China between 1729 and 1832. Thereafter, trade was to improve spectacularly as the number of Chinese addicts soared to over 10 million.
Did the British care? Apparently not. Growing rich on the sufferings of others, as all predator nations know, is the iron rule of life. It’s known as the Survival of the Fittest. The Jews were indisputably the driving force behind this evil trade, as today they are behind the evil pandemic of porn addiction. Then it was opium, now it is pornography. New addictions for new ages.
Curiously enough, opium dens often doubled as brothels.
Among other things—painkiller, anaesthetic, stupefacient, hypnosis inducer, euphoria giver—opium was also a powerful aphrodisiac and had been associated with sexual performance since the 16th century. According to Chinese physician  Li Slizhen, writing in  his Compendium of Materia Medica (1578), opium had the ability to confer extra stamina and staying power during intercourse, since it had the ability to “arrest seminal emission.”

Gorgeous young Russian girls and slant-eyed Asiatic Jewesses were available for sex in the opium dens of Shanghai. These sordid dens of vice where emaciated men poured their semen into the voracious vaginas of opium-addicted girls—for whom sex was a way of paying for their next opium fix—spread to the great Western cities: to Paris, London, Berlin, New York, and San Francisco. By the late 19th century, there were 200,000 opium addicts in the United States, three-quarters of them women.

Here (see the Punch cartoon below) is how the jingoistic Brits, under their Jewish mentors, treated the Chinese in the heyday of the British Empire. The Chinese would do well to remember these past humiliations and do their utmost to keep the old colonialists raptors out of their country.
John-Leech-Cartoons-Punch-1857-05-09-185
§
We have now learned a valuable history lesson. The Chinese intelligentsia today are doubtless acquainted with these basic facts. They too must know who their historical enemies are.
If they have any doubts, let them open their history books and a litany of Jewish names will spring from those musty pages, the names of all the Jews who helped to plunder their ancestors via the British Empire: Elias David Sassoon and Silas Aaron Hardoon, partners in E.D. Sassoon & Co, as already mentioned above, in addition to Edward Ezra, Morris Cohen—described by the South African Sunday Express in 1945 as “the guiding genius behind the War Lords of China”—Jacob Borodin (aka Grusenberg), Trebitsch Lincoln (British MP), BK Galen (aka Chesin), Skidelski, Gekker, Koslowsky, Snamensky, MD Lashewitz, WN Levitscher, A Joffe, R. Haas, JB Rajchman, Ben Kizer.
All these names will be found in an essay written by Arnold Leese, a notorious anti-Semite, so maybe he shouldn’t  be taken too seriously when he concludes his exposé, The Jewish Rotting of China,  with these shocking words:

“Every key position in the process
of the Bolshevik destruction of China has been Jewish.” 

1a3
The prospects for the world do not look good. We are not talking here any longer about the “takeover” of China by the Jews. As Franklin Ryckaert, with his astute observation on aggressive mimicry might say: “The parasites have already taken control of the host’s body.”
When the time is right, I predict, the Jews will jump ship en masse and make China their next cash cow and kleptocracy—but not before they have destroyed America, leaving behind a Third World country in ruins.
Here, in this multicultural hell pit of existential despair, the remnants of the white race will have to put up with rape and murder on an unprecedented scale, like the Russians and Germans in the first half of the 20th century at the hands of the same Bolshevik Jews.
The sun is setting on the American Empire and night is about to fall, like the blade of an axe on the neck of the bleating lamb.

FROM ENGINEERED MACRO EVOLUTION, TRANSEXUALISM, TRANSEVOLUTION, TRANSHUMANISM TO DEHUMANISSM.

0
0

ENOUGH!

THE "ENLIGHTENED HUMANISTS" TOOK OVER THE WORLD AND CALLED US OBSCURANTISTS.  AFTER DESTROYING THE CHURCH, RELIGION AND GOD AND ARE LONG SET ON DEHUMANISING US AND DESTROYING ALL LIFE ON EARTH AND BEYOND, EXCEPT THEIR ENGINEERED ONES! 

FROM ENGINEERED MACRO EVOLUTION, TRANSEXUALISM, TRANSEVOLUTION, TRANSHUMANISM TO DEHUMANISM AND HUMANICIDE!

Transhumanism: The Annihilation of Humanity?

Techno-Psychopaths Set to Destroy Life on Earth


Listen to Daniel Estulin discussing TransEvolution on Truth Jihad Radio


dees-drone-weather


By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor


Put on your tinfoil hat and wax paranoid with me for a moment.

Imagine that you knew your neighbor was planning to kill you. Imagine he had the means, motive and opportunity to do so. What would you do?

You would take action to stop him, correct?

Now imagine you learned that this same neighbor was going to kill your whole family as well. I assume this would steepen your resolve to do something about it.

And then it gets worse: The neighbor is going to poison the water supply and kill your entire town, village or city. And worse than that: He’s going to mass-murder your whole nation. And worse yet: He’s going to kill every human being on the face of the earth…and maybe even all the animals, plants, and other life forms.

And he’s openly bragging about it. He says he will soon have weapons to pull it off. And you have reason to believe that he may very well be right.

What would you do?

If you didn’t resolve to stop him by any means necessary, and immediately put that resolve into action, you would be at least seven billion times stupider and crazier than someone who didn’t defend his own life against a murderous, psychopathic neighbor.
This is the position we all find ourselves in as we learn about the transhumanist agenda of the New World Order. These people are literally plotting to kill us all  – and quite possibly most or all of the earth’s other life forms as well.
Yet the individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. – J. Edgar Hoover
Transhumanism: The Coming Age of Human Deconstructionby Daniel Estulin lays it all out: Our children will probably be the last human generation on earth…

…At least if we don’t rise up and overthrow these psychopaths, destroy their laboratories and machines, and declare, along with Bill McKibben, Enough! Staying Human in an Engineered Age.

51AKQtdeRWL
Let’s start with Estulin’s book. Daniel Estulin,  a Russian expatriate currently living in Spain, is best known for his groundbreaking journalism exposing the Bilderberg Group – the ultra-secret elite conclave that meets every year to map out New World Order strategies for achieving complete global domination. His new book TransEvolution, published by the world’s greatest small press, Trine Day, exposes what the people who really rule the world have in store for us. Believe me, it is not pretty.
Estulin begins by citing a 91-page report called Strategic Trends 2007-2036– a disturbing document which currently serves as “the backbone of the United Kingdom’s defense policy.” That report depicts a world going to hell through “humanitarian catastrophe caused by a mixture of  climate change, resource pressures, uneven distribution of wealth, the effect of disease and the failure of authorities to cope with population growth and urbanization.” Yet the super-rich – the Bilderbergers who originally prepared the report – will be fully protected thanks to “pervasive surveillance” and the deployment of military and “private military forces” (PMF) along with various forms of social-control and mind-control technology.

That technology, it seems, will quickly put an end to humanity. Estulin lays it out in his discussion of Russia 2045, another dystopian document that tells us:
“By 2035, an implantable information chip could be developed and wired directly to the user’s brain…synthetic sensory perception beamed directly to the user’s senses.” (165)
Such chipping, Estulin explains, would allow for individual minds to be “hived” i.e. integrated with the global computer matrix – “which is outright mind control, no strings attached.” Such a scenario would mean the end of humanity, since whatever the hive of computer-controlled brains was experiencing, it certainly wouldn’t be anything recognizably human.

At the price of their freedom and dignity – their humanity – the hived sheeple would undoubtedly be able to out-compete humans in the struggle for resources and existence. Anyone who didn’t kill themselves and their children by injecting a control-chip into the brain would be obsolete and soon dead.

Transhumanists, being self-hating suicidal/homicidal lunatics, apparently think this sounds really cool. Estulin explains that the transhumanists wish to become post-human: “A post-human is someone who has been modified with performance enhancing body and brain augmentations to the point that they could no longer call themselves human.”

Murder your humanity to enhance your performance. Ain’t that the story of modern Western civilization?

The Israelis, to take an extreme example, are very high-performance, very efficient. As Jeff Gates explains, they excel at the cold-blooded, arguably psychopathic calculations of game theory. They’re very good at orchestrating false flags. They’re masters of propaganda. They’re well advanced in the tech sector of the global economy, especially in surveillance, security, and “anti-terror” fields.
Yet they’re a cold, inhuman people –  ungenerous, rather robotic, not terribly kind. They have a huge PR problem due to the fact that foreigners, especially Americans, who have any personal experience with both Israelis and Palestinians, tend to love  Palestinians while disliking Israelis. (Zionist propagandist Robert Kaplan alludes to this problem in his diatribe against The Arabists: The Romance of an American Elite.)

No wonder Israel is the cutting edge of the West – the sharp tip of the spear plunged into the heart of Islam.

Ironically, the Israelis became monsters by grafting their ancestors’ chosen-ness “master race complex” onto the West’s characteristically post-Christian hatred of “fallen” human nature and our “fallen” world. Many Christians have a tendency to hate nature, including human nature, and to yearn for its annihilation. Today’s rapture-ists, who long for Jesus to nuke the fallen and save the handful of true believers, exemplify this loathing of the natural.

The post-Christian West took their forefathers’ religious hatred of nature and turned it into a technological imperative. They are trying to pave the earth, cover it with ever-taller buildings, spray toxic nano-metals into the atmosphere and seize control over its weather, mass-produce everything including people, achieve total power over the human mind, and genetically engineer life right out of existence.
All this in the name of “science” and “progress.”

enough
One of the few sane men left in the West, Bill McKibben, has had it up to here with science and progress. McKibben’s book Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age suggests it’s long past time to call a moratorium on scientific and technological “progress” in general, and genetic engineering in particular.

The most immediate technological threat, McKibben thinks, is germline genetic engineering, which involves changing genes in gametes, zygotes, or very early embryos. It will soon be possible, if it is not already being done, to “enhance the performance” of your future children by inserting genes for high IQ, athletic performance, musical talent, or whatever your control-addicted power-freak little heart desires.

Of course, this will cost money. The rich will get the “best” performance-enhanced kids. Soon we’ll be in a Hobbesian genetic war of all against all, and the devil take the hindmost.

As McKibben explains, genetic “enhancement” destroys humanity. A child who grows up with an implanted gene for musical or tennis talent, purchased by her parents at great expense, and then is forced to practice endlessly in hopes of becoming a top pianist or Wimbledon champion, is more of a product – a robot – than a human being.  After a few generations of these genetic performance enhancements, the control freaks who buy genes to make their kids better control freaks will have produced a race of monsters that will put an end to the last vestiges of human freedom.

And then there are the converging technologies of nano-engineering, artificial intelligence, and artificial life…which, alongside genetic engineering, represent a gun held against humanity’s head, with the safety off, in a hand that has no compunctions about squeezing the trigger. (Control-freaks’ definition of “intelligence” is, of course, cleverness in being a control freak.)

The mad scientists developing these weapons of mass extinction know full well that their work will lead to the inevitable collective murder of the human race. They and their transhumanist cheering section welcome this event, which they call “the singularity.”

It could come about through “gray goo.” McKibben, quoting Stephen S. Hall, points out that nano-engineered artificial life, which will inevitably be programmed to feed on sources of energy and multiply, will likely escape control and:
“…convert the entire surface biosphere (the ecology of all things on the surface of the Earth) into alternative or artificial materials of some type – especially, materials like themselves, e.g. more self-replicating nano-robots…Ecophagic nanorobots would regard living things as environmental carbon accumulators, and biomass as a valuable ore to be mined for carbon and energy. Of course, biosystems from which all carbon has been extracted can no longer be alive but would instead become lifeless chemical sludge.” (90-91)
But gray goo is just an extreme case.  The problem is much larger than that, and the end could come in any number of ways.  McKibben understands, as few moderns have, that we have long since passed the point of diminishing returns: Most of our new technologies are making life worse, not better.

Even everyday technologies that seem positive have steep downsides. The automobile, for example, has given us supreme freedom…to travel to a very wide variety of noisy, paved, polluted places. The airplane has given us even more freedom to go and visit people from other cultures…and drop bombs on them, enslave them with debt, poison them with GMO foods, and culturally-genocide them with our inhuman way of life. Telephones have made us all connected…including with just about anyone who may wish to intrude on us or interrupt us at any hour of the day or night. Email, which theoretically allows us to defer communicating with such people until such time as we have set aside for that, ends up eating more and more of our waking hours. Meanwhile brainwashed sheeple, their synapses polluted with EMF radiation from an early age, move toward instant messaging of various types, which (unlike email) demand immediate attention and end by reducing the user’s attention span to that of a gnat, transforming humans into mindless robots lurching through life staring at tiny little screens.

And now we have cell phones and “smart” phones, which allow the whole world to interrupt us even when we’re outside the house…and invite the NSA to track our every move and turn on the microphone to eavesdrop on us at will. (Carry around a “smart” phone and you can easily be targeted and blown up by a “smart” bomb on a “smart” drone…after which you will no longer be around to smartly wonder just how smart it was to buy that “smart” phone in the first place.)

How could any sane person on earth not be at all-out war with the apostles of out-of-control technology?
Or to rephrase the question: Where is the Unabomber when we need him?

McKibben is a much kinder and gentler human being than Ted Kaczynski. His approach is to kindly and gently ask:

“Must we forever grow in reach and power? Or can we, should we, ever say, ‘Enough’?
I think I just said it.

Kevin Barrett

Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.

Dr. Barrett has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.

Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.
 
 

WE CAN ALL AND SHOULD ALL SING FOR PLEASURE, LOVED ONES, FAMILY AND FRIENDS.

0
0
 SKILL DEVELOPMENT
 Secrets d'histoire Gloire et douleurs de la Callas
<a href="/channel/UCEFQW3nveN44HGMXsSADVCg" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-ytid="UCEFQW3nveN44HGMXsSADVCg" data-name="" data-sessionlink="ei=QlSMVOoQyrDQBZKHgHA">buisson Pierre</a>
http://www.perbristow.com/wp-content/themes/busybee-new/images/new_header.gif
Per Bristow is a vocal coach and performance coach based in Los Angeles and the creator of the Bristow Voice Method - that for more than 15 years has empowered singers and speakers to heal, develop and free their voices.

His Sing With Freedom and The Singing Zone home study program has trained thousands of people from 132 nations to develop greater awareness of body and mind, rapidly release restrictions, and effectively develop all physical aspects of the voice. In addition, his method is known to go far beyond developing the physical aspects of the voice, to truly free the "inner voice", to gain greater levels of well-being, confidence, creativity and health, as well as dramatically improve communication, presentation and performance skills.

Here is your free video!

Welcome to the Bristow Voice Method and The Singing Zone!

I'm Per Bristow and I am truly honored to help you achieve your dreams. For the last two decades, I've been helping high-in-demand professionals, up-and-coming artists, as well as "hobbyists" with the same goal in mind: To get the person from where they are to where they want to be in the most effective way.

Here is the link to the Free Video that you requested at TheSingingZone.com

==> Click Here To Watch The FREE VIDEO  <==

As you may know, the Sing With Freedom and The Singing Zone home study program has trained tens of thousands of singers in 117 countries. Although it has become the world's most popular training program, I have never set out to win popularity contests. My passion is to develop strategies to help you become a better version of yourself - to develop what you are truly capable of.

I know how detrimental it can be when the voice isn't functioning the way we would like it to. It's not fun when those high notes don't come out, or if the voice breaks, or if you get hoarse and tired. Nor is it fun when you feel you don't sound good, or you're not confident to express.

Being able to sing well with confidence and freedom is a very important activity. Singing is a vital part of every society. It's a natural way of expressing yourself, and it brings with it numerous proven health benefits. Singing is for everybody and we can enjoy singing on many different levels. What would life be if we had no music and song?

Having said that, my training is not for everyone. That is why I'm giving you this free video so you get a fundamental understanding of my philosophy before you take another singing lesson.

You'll see why singing scales is counter productive, why we don't engage in the standard detrimental statements, such as "sing through your mask" or " sing from your stomach".

You'll also understand why it is that this kind of training goes far beyond developing your physical voice - it also empowers you as a human being. You become more confident and influential, and you therefore attract greater success both on and off the stage.

However, step number one is to watch the video:

==> Click Here To Watch The FREE VIDEO  <==


I hope this is the beginning of a great journey to discover, release and develop amazing new abilities within you!

Sing and live with freedom!

Per Bristow

Is It True People Believe This About Singing?

Posted on 09. Aug, 2013 by Per Bristow in Uncategorized
Is it really true?  Please say it isn’t so.  Help me out here.
Is it really true that people in this day and age believe this about singing? Here are some examples posted from people on Facebook:
“U can not teach anyone to sing! It is a gift!”
“If you aren’t born singing, it is like art, you can’t be taught.”
“If you can sing, you can. If you can’t, why pretend”
“You either have it or you don’t.  No singing lessons will help you much”
Can it really be true that people really believe such nonsense? I’m afraid many really do.  Far too many.
What makes people think developing their singing voice is any different from developing any other skill?
I’ve never heard anyone say “you either have it or you don’t” about playing tennis, playing guitar, writing, or cooking. Have what exactly? What is “it”?
See, if you are saying singing can’t be taught, you are also saying you cannot learn, develop, or improve at all.
Now, I understand that it is possible that “singing lessons” conjure up beliefs of singing scales and engaging in old-fashioned training methods. It is true that many pop and rock singers shy away from such training, and rightly so.
Perhaps these beliefs stem from the truth that people who have a hard time singing on key, and those who sound “bad” due to restricted voices (considered non-talented), likely never develop much by singing scales (as explained in this video). Maybe that is what adds to the myth that you can’t train to get a good singing voice.
But does someone seriously believe that successful, so-called “talented” people do nothing to develop? That they don’t train? That they haven’t been influenced by mentors in some way – whether we call it “lessons” or not?
And then we have people in the other camp who like to believe:
“Anyone can sing, you just need the heart for it.”
Well, it sounds lovely, but it’s really just as ignorant and misleading as saying that all you need is heart to be a great piano player. Yes, it’s true that the super skilled have enormous “hearts”.  It is the “heart”, the love, the passion, that have made them endure the rejections, the naysayers, the pain and suffering, and the hours of hours of endless training.
It is that heart that makes the super successful continue when most people would give up. And I have written endlessly about the fact that the successful are the ones who fail and dare to fail more often.
However, heart and passion doesn’t make you skilled.  You don’t suddenly develop a skill just because you have “heart”.  Love and passion for something is not something you just “have”.
But surely, Per, you’re not denying that some people are more talented than others?
No, I’m not denying that.  But I am questioning who has the ability to judge it.  Is it the kid who sings wonderfully on pitch at the age of six who is going to become a great singer?  I beg to disagree.  It may very well be the shy, introverted 16 year old who has never sung before who becomes the poet and singer and creative force that influences the world.
The only thing we can judge is the skill someone has in the moment. And the lack of skill may very well be a result of a failed strategy, rather than a reflection of the real potential.
Maybe it is the 75 year-old who has never sung before who becomes the powerful role model of what is possible, and has a far greater impact on people than any singer before them.
In fact, it is very possible that the person who is actively engaged in creating wonderful music in their community choir has a far greater impact on the community than Madonna has.
But who can measure that?
However, even if someone is more skilled than another, the real question is: So what? Why do we have to judge in the first place?
The real point here is that I don’t need to strive to win the Wimbledon in order to enjoy playing tennis. My level of “talent” has nothing to do with if I like to have a coach to help me improve, learn and enjoy playing even more.
Does the level of “talent” determine how you are allowed to participate in and enjoy an activity? Is it only the “gifted” that are allowed to enjoy and participate in the arts?  Are you not allowed to improve unless you measure up to some level of “talent”?
Seriously, we have to stop these detrimental beliefs and judgments about “talents” and “gifts”.
The only thing that matters is if you have the capacity to improve. And the answer to that is of course always yes. (Improving isn’t defined by jumping higher or singing higher notes. We have the capacity to improve in many ways.)
The next question to ask is if you like to improve.
It’d like to suggest that every single human being likes to improve.  Every single human being loves to learn, grow, explore, discover, and experience somehow. Whether improvements are measurable or not are not always relevant.  It is the experience from engaging in meaningful activities that gives us joy. My passion is to help people experience this, to help them draw out more of their potential, to help you experience growth and possibilities within. Experiencing a sense of growth is the juice of life. In fact, we could argue it is the very definition of life.
Feel free to share your thoughts below.

The Abuse That Kills Children’s (And Adult’s) Voices

Posted on 19. Sep, 2013 by Per Bristow in Communication, Performance, Singing
I am addressing this for the sake of our children, for the sake of you adults, as well as society in general.  In my previous article, I wrote about the tragic beliefs that prevent so many from living fulfilled lives.  In fact, it prevents people from fulfilling some basic human needs.  As a parent, educator and coach, having personally coached hundreds of people (thousands probably) with belief systems that stem from subconscious traumas often formed in childhood, this deeply concerns me. When it still happens in our school systems through sheer ignorance, I find it even more disturbing.
If you haven’t read the previous article, you might want to do so first. Click here to read it first. (By the way, thanks to all of you who made some wonderful insightful comments!)
To bring home this point I will here use a real exchange with a human being – a woman named Gail. Ultimately it is not about her, but about the common beliefs and tendencies.
She had posted publicly a comment directly in regards to what I do and offer. This time instead of just ignoring it, I wanted to dig deeper. I wanted to understand what drives someone to believe this, and why someone wants to post it publicly. It turned into a fascinating and frightening exploration of human ignorance and the subtle abuse of children.
Gail first wrote:
“You have to be born with a voice, just like a ball player has to be born with a pitching arm.”
Now, these nonsense comments are not new. In this case, anyone would understand that it is somewhat helpful to have a voice if you want to sing, and an arm if you want to pitch baseball. But she obviously means more than that. So, I decided to post this response:
“The good news is that most people are born with a voice, just as most people are born with an arm. Then the question is what we want to learn to do with what we were born with. “
She then responds:
“Of course everyone is born with a voice. I was talking about a GREAT voice. Or a great pitching arm. You have to be born with those talents. Everyone can’t sing. That’s a scam, saying that. Watching the video cannot turn a monotone into Whitney Houston. Don’t be ridiculous. One has to have the pipes, has to be born with the voice.”
Aha, so there we have it. She meant – and quite adamantly so – that one has to be born with a GREAT voice. But in order to do what exactly? Is she the one who is able to pinpoint who exactly it is of all newborns who has the “GREAT voice”. Perhaps she would like to be the one who labels those who don’t. So she concludes everyone can’t sing? Okay. So what? Not everyone can speak Swedish either. I have yet to hear an infant sing Ave Maria.
She mentions that watching a video cannot turn a “monotone” into Whitney Houston.  Have I claimed this? (She is referring to the free video presentation at The Singing Zone.) If she had bothered to educate herself and do a little research, she would know that I am a proponent of training.  Whitney Houston is, in fact, a great example of someone who was engrossed in training (i.e. singing, exploring her voice and expressing herself in song), as well as being exposed to great singers and mentors from when she was born.
But like we discussed in the previous article, I don’t need to beat Roger Federer to enjoy playing tennis, so I wrote:
“The other good news is that you don’t have to be Whitney Houston to enjoy singing, nor do you have to be the world’s best pitcher to play baseball. Of course everyone can improve their singing, just like everyone can improve throwing a ball. The question is how to improve effectively. This training is for those who love to sing, and would love to engage in ways to effectively develop this wonderful form of expression.”
She responds:
“That’s true, but there are some monotones who will never sing. It is a scam to promise people they can learn to sing. That’s false.”
So what on earth is a “monotone”?  Who is Gail, and who is the child or adult that she wants to label “a monotone”?
I should add that I have never met someone who has the ability to only make one frequency.  Have you? Imagine every sound you make is exactly 440Hz. Wow, that would be pretty incredible. Our friend Gail does apparently not really know about music, frequencies or what the word “monotone” means. Nor does she obviously have any idea of what singing and singing training is, or what I do.  Nor does she likely know what drove her internally to post this in the first place.
She obviously feels a need to express herself. She wants to feel important. She wants to be heard. We can all understand that.  These are basic human needs. This is also why singing is one of the most empowering activities we can engage in, why every culture sings, and every infant “sings” – until they are shut down by people like Gail who tell the untrained, or the ones who don’t measure up to Whitney Houston, to be quiet and call them “monotone”.
You may have seen some of the many case stories, such as the video with James who was shut down all his life from a belief that came from a choir director once telling him that he would never be able to sing.  But now, he is finally finding so much joy singing in the choir.
You have heard the enlightening wisdom from Art Therapist Laura about the traumas of being silenced as a kid, and the important therapeutic benefits of releasing your voice – however good or bad the Gails of the world think you are.
And Gail goes on:
“There are absolutely people who can never carry a tune. Ask any nursery school music teacher. We all have different skills in life. Not everyone can sing. You’re making false promises, if you promise that.
Nursery school teacher?  Now, that’s interesting.  Is she herself a teacher?  At a nursery school? And she believes that from having observed a child who doesn’t sing in tune, she now has the right to judge the child’s future abilities? Has she really no understanding of the vast difference between an observed ability/skill in the moment, versus what a person is potentially capably of in the future.
Does this labeling only apply to singing and throwing a ball, or all other skills and abilities also?
So I wrote, admittedly quite harshly:
“Imagine the child entering Gail’s nursery school who doesn’t sing in tune and is told: “You will NEVER learn to sing”. Imagine the child who misses the first attempt at shooting a basketball and is therefore told: “You will NEVER play basketball”. Imagine the child who cannot write and is told: “You will NEVER learn to write”. It is tragic that children every day are being abused like that.”
Now, I call it abuse and that’s a strong word.  Many times what happens is not meant as abuse.  It comes from loving people who just don’t know better.
When my son was in preschool we noticed a pattern that his teacher was often jokingly telling him “You never talk to me”.  Several years later she would still repeat the same thing.  And she was right. Why on earth would he want to talk to her after having received that label? Does she really believe putting a negative label on a child will make the child change? Of course not.Finally when he got another teacher, he would open up and communicate in a completely different way.
Does our friend Gail seriously think that the kid who feels she doesn’t sing well, is the kid who is going to go home and practice like crazy to overcome this difficulty – especially if she has come to believe there is something wrong with her  – that she was never born with “the voice”?  Especially since she has been told by her trusted teacher that she cannot possibly learn, and that anyone who tells you so is a fraud and a scam.
Is she suddenly going to feel comfortable to sing out beautifully?  Of course not.  Maybe the fears and discomfort of “not being good” is restricting the vibration, which makes singing on key extremely difficult. Maybe the kid hasn’t been exposed to music, or she has never had the opportunity to experiment and explore her voice without being judged. Maybe he has been told to be quiet. Maybe the key the teacher picked doesn’t fit comfortably.  Maybe there is a hearing problem.  There are a numerous factors that can all be fixed. And there are always ways for someone to become better at a skill through effective strategies.
Yet, the ignorant teacher, who does no research and has evidently no interest in learning herself, prefers to simply label the child (and adult) as someone who is “not born with a voice”.
It’s also interesting that Gail refers to baseball – especially in the light of the fact that I have written extensively about sports, including my son’s baseball endeavors and his skills. I’ve written about when my son showed up on the baseball field at the age of 5 and astounded everyone with his “natural talent”. The reason I wrote this was exactly to help explain the enormous amount of training he had already been engaged in to develop the coordination and awareness of his body, eye sight, mental attitude to learning and performing, the mechanics of throwing, etc., that the uninformed unfortunately just want to call “natural”.
Now we could easily argue that I am abusing Gail, here.  She will be invited to read this and I’m sure it won’t be pleasant.  We can all understand and be compassionate since it is very possible that Gail is not aware of some traumas of her own that may have caused her to believe this. I frankly hope this will help her awaken.
As adults we do have the potential to reflect and make choices.  We can choose to become even more hostile and go on the attack or we can choose to reflect and learn from hurtful events and our mistakes.  Perhaps Gail would like to reflect on why it is that she likely has not developed her singing voice herself, or why she likely isn’t very good at throwing a ball.  Perhaps she would like to reflect on the fact that those who have learned how to acquire skills are also the ones who often willingly want to help others.  Perhaps she wants to do some more research and think before calling the next educator and trainer a scam due to her own fears.
Now she did write one final response to my last comment to defend herself.  She wrote:
“I have never discouraged a child in my life. You do not know me. I will never tell an innocent child s/he can’t do something. But holding out a false hope to an adult is a scam. Tell me you don’t make money from this? I have never put down a kid in my life. I have great works of art all over my fridge from grammar school art projects. They are cute and beautiful. What were you thinking accusing me of putting down kids. You don’t know that I worked, advocated for kids all my born days. I’m 72.”
So there we have it.  She has never discouraged anyone. Expect for the fact that she has publicly tried to discourage everyone who wasn’t “born with a GREAT voice”.
She will never tell an innocent child she can’t do something. The question is if that only applies to those who are “born with the talent”, or it would otherwise give them “false hope”. (Or maybe that was just for the adults.)
We have never doubted she has great artwork by kids on her fridge. The question is what happens to the art that is by her deemed “ not great”.
It is not surprising that, as it turns out, she loves children and wants to protect them. Gail is probably a wonderful person in many ways who has done a lot of good in the world.
But this article is intended to encourage thought. I hope it encourages you, who may have come to believe in what you can or cannot do, to realize that it is perfectly fine to engage in activities, improving them, and enjoying them, without having to be judged as “great”.
I hope it encourages everybody to watch out for the tendency to label children, as well as label adults. The way you lead your life today is likely due to beliefs you have formed at an early age. Perhaps you have been hurt and ridiculed.  Perhaps you have been labeled. And we should also understand that “you are a natural” is also a label that can cause just as much problems as “you are a monotone” with the heightened expectations that come with it.
To close, we should understand that hopes, goals, dreams and aspirations are very frightening for some.  Many adults want to protect children by shutting down goals and aspirations out of fear of disappointment.  They don’t realize that it is not the accomplishment of the dream and goal itself that is the reward, but it’s the journey that gives life a purpose.  Yes, we understand that there are many out there who are afraid, and therefore don’t want to encourage “false hopes”.
Personally, I don’t provide hope.  I provide training.
Per Bristow
(Feel free to comment below)

 
EXPERIENCE The AMAZING FEELING When You SING – REALLY

SingwithFreedom!

Singers in 132 countries have used these breakthrough strategies
to heal, free and empower their voices - and to become confident, charismatic and captivating performers!

Free Video Reveals The Secrets

  • Discover how to effectively develop strength, resonance and range!
  • See why singing scales has proven to be counterproductive!

Who benefits and why has this become
the world's most popular voice training program?

Professional Singers

use this training to heal voice problems, get in top shape for concerts and recordings, and improve the physical and mental skills to be able to perform at their peak under pressure.

Hobby Singers

experience newfound joy and passion to sing and express in music. Singing becomes an even more empowering activity, and you become a greater asset to your group, choir, band and community.

Beginner Singers

discover a new amazing instrument that was never developed before. When releasing previous fears and beliefs of not being able to sing well, it tends to become a life-transforming experience.

Any Style Singer

While Per has been hailed as “the rock singer’s dream coach” and has a long history of coaching contemporary singers, his method has proven equally effective for all style of singers.

Singers Over 70

have experienced tremendous benefits from the program. Regain strength and vitality in the voice and experience the joy of singing with greater freedom at home and in communities.

Teachers

use the training to, not only help their own voices, but to improve their businesses by learning new ways to empower their students to sing, express and perform with greater freedom.

ARISTOTLE SOCRATES ONASSIS BLOODLINE AND OTTOMAN FREMASONRY,

0
0

 2005 The Onassis Dynasty - The Dönmeh or the Assassins of Salonica | UNITARIAN UNIVERSALISTS
104,045
Published on 19 Mar 2013
Codename Aristotle Socrates Onassis (Αριστοτέλης Ωνάσης) the Alpha and the Omega Ω - Nemesis, commonly called Ari or Aristo, Onassis (name invented by Quisling J Stalin Foch Van Bergen Baron Berwick), a prominent bisexual spy Ottoman Revolutionary Dönmeh / Young Turk with Paris Foreign Missions Society, posing as a Greek shipping magnate. Born in 1900 in the Frankish quarter of Salonica, recruited in 1918 by Allied General Franchet d'Esperey as Enachi Esparcidos, terminated 15 March 1975 in Paris. Polygamist (from πολύς γάμος), on his deathbed at 88 Ave. Foch, he was forced to surrender his fortune to the Unitarian wife in Norway. In 1923, Aristo left for Buenos Aires, on a Nansen passport given to him by Vidkun and NKVD-Maria Quisling in Sofia, for his first job (in international espionage) at the British United River Plate Telephone Company, during Operation Trust (операция "Трест") .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ari_Onassis

Thessaloniki - HQ of Young Turk movement in early 20th century.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_...

Dönmeh refers to a group who secretly practiced Sabbateanism after Sabbatai Zevi, a 17th-century kabbalist who claimed to be Messiah, and became a Muslim in order to escape punishment by Sultan Mehmed IV.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%B6nmeh

French President Nicolas Sarkozy's mother was born to the Mallah family, one of the oldest Dönmeh families of Thessaloniki (Salonika), in Greece.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_h...

The Young Turks (Jön Türkler (plural) or Turkish: Genç Türkler (plural), from French: Les Jeunes Turcs) was a secularist Turkish nationalist reform party in the early twentieth century, favoring reformation of the absolute monarchy of the Ottoman Empire. Officially known as the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), their leaders led a rebellion against Sultan Abdul Hamid II. They contributed to establish the Second Constitutional Era in 1908 and The İttihat ve Terakki (Committee of Union and Progress) based on the ideas of the Young Turks ruled the Ottoman empire from 1908 until the end of World War I in November 1918.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Turks

Operation Nemesis (Նեմեսիս» գործողութիւն) was the Armenian Revolutionary Federation's code-name for a covert operation in early 1920s to assassinate the Turkish planners of the Armenian Genocide. The Operation, between 1920--1922, assassinated many significant political and military figures of the Ottoman Empire, the Internal Affairs Minister of Azerbaijan and Armenians who were worked against the Armenian cause.

It was named after the Greek goddess of divine retribution, Nemesis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operatio...

The Boatmen of Thessaloníki (Гемиджиите, Гемиџиите) or the Assassins of Salonica, were an anarchistic group active in the Ottoman Empire in the years around 1900. Its members were young graduates from the Bulgarian Men's High School of Thessaloniki. From 28 April until 1 May 1903 the group launched a campaign of terror bombing in Thessaloniki, the so called "Thessaloniki bombings of 1903". Their aim was to attract the attention of the Great Powers to Ottoman oppression in Macedonia and Thrace.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boatmen_...

Zacharias Basileios Zacharoff, GCB, GBE (October 6, 1849 Muğla -- November 27, 1936 Monte Carlo, Monaco), was an Ottoman Revolutionary Dönmeh, arms dealer and financier. His association with Louis II of Monaco led to his purchase of the debt-ridden Société des Bains de Mer which ran Monte Carlo's famed casino, the principal source of revenue for the Prince.

Zaharoff was a friend of both the actress Sarah Bernhardt and her Greek husband Jacques Damala. When Damala's mistress (who injected him with heroin between acts of plays he was appearing in) had an illegitimate daughter by him in 1889, she left the baby in a basket (with a note) on Sarah Bernhardt's doorstep. The baby was given into the care of Zaharoff, who found a family to raise her in eastern Thrace (in Adrianopole). In 1920 she posed for Picasso, and she had affairs with American spy Ernest Hemingway and Gabriel D'Annunzio (an early Italian Fascist).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basil_Za...

Vidkun Abraham Lauritz Jonssøn Quisling (18 July 1887 -- 24 October 1945) was a Norwegian politician and Unitarian minister. On 9 April 1940, with the Nazi invasion of Norway in progress, he seized power in a Soviet-backed coup d'état.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vidkun_Q...

Operation Trust (операция "Трест") was a counterintelligence operation of the State Political Directorate (GPU) of the Soviet Union.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_Op...

The Onassis Dynasty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnMg6-...

Onassis Dynasty
DVD Release Date: December 5, 2005
http://shop.history.com/onassis-dynas...
   The Onassis Bloodline

Understanding the forces that are shaping our lives, on the one hand is Jesus who aches to save us, and on the other side is Satan who laughs at how he continues to put deceptions over on us. God has made provision for us. God has offered us the understanding and wisdom of what is going on- We do not have to remained confused as to how world events are happening or what they are planning to do. The Bible says the wise shall understand. This series of articles is offered to help people understand the real movers and shakers of the world, the men and families who control politicians and preachers like puppets.


CAST OF MAIN CHARACTERS
Aristotle Socrates Onassis -- named after two Greek philosophers, went from being totally broke at age 21 to being a millionaire at age 23. His father’s first name was Socrates. Aristotle was an Illuminati king, a shipping tycoon, an intelligent ruthless hard-driving man, a man of the world who spoke a number of languages such as French, Spanish, English, Italian, and Turkish. He married JFK’s widow. His ever-present sunglasses made him look like Al Capone to a number of people.
Jackie Bouvier Kennedy Onassis-Her father was a member of the Society of the Cincinnati, the American equivalent to the Order of the Garter. Her father “ Black Jack” was corrupt, what is known as a womanizer. He worked at making a living from the stock market. Jackie’s “step-father” was the Auchincloss family, an elite family. Her step-father’s second wife before Jackie’s mother was Senator Thomas Gore’s daughter. Her step-father was in Naval Intelligence. Jackie went to the schools that the children of the elite go to. On the anniversary of JFK’s assassination, Orville & Jane Freeman were the only ones to remember the date to say or do something about it. Jackie went that day to Central Park and had a good cry.
Stavros Niarchos-Aristotle’s brother-in-law and Ari’s business competition. Stavros’ parents came from Sparta, Greece. His relatives were rich. Stavros went into shipping and after W.W. II broke out, left Greece to avoid having to fight for Greece. He was a close friend of Colgate, Roosevelt and Bernard Baruch, who he would invite to his house on Long Island. He rented his Long island house from Harry Hopkins who was the man who told Pres. F.D. Roosevelt what to do. Even though he was a millionaire, he had a difficult time avoiding have to serve. Eventually, he managed to get himself situated as a naval officer in intelligence for Greece in Alexandria, Egypt. Information sent into the ’69-70 Who’s Who reference book about his war time exploits are fictitious. Niarchos and Aristotle were friends from 1934 onward, but also at times enemies trying to outdo each other. Both frequently went to St. Moritz, Swit., a ski resort. Stavros also frequents an old Medici family Palace/estate near Turin where the Duke of Edinburgh and Baron Elie de Rothschild like to go and shoot birds. The estate has many and it isn’t unusual for them to kill a thousand a day. Stavros is an important leader of the Bilderbergs and a billionaire. He married Henry Ford II’s daughter who was 38 years younger than he was, and divorced her shortly afterwards. He worked closely with David Rockefeller.


IS THE ONASSIS BLOODLINE STILL POWERFUL?
Aristotle Onassis died in 1975. His son and heir to his throne died in 1973. My inside information about the Onassis family being one of the top 13 goes back to the 1960s and 70’s. Is the family still powerful? One big clue that they still wield power within the Illuminati is that Stavros Niarchos, Aristotle’s brother-in-law, is a powerful Bilderberg. The executive committee of the Bilderbergs are the equivalent to 9° of the branch Illuminati. Is the Onassis family still one of the top 13 Satanic bloodlines? I do not know. The answer lies in doing genealogical work to find out what the core satanic bloodline is that curses through the Onassis family.
One whistle-blower on the Illuminati was Dennis Brunnelle, a Grand Master of an OTO lodge, who became disillusioned with the OTO’s Illuminati program. Some of his information touches on the Onassis family. My understanding of the Onassis family is limited in terms of their Satanic activities with the Illuminati, but I will attempt to give my readers a better understanding. My inside knowledge of the occult side-that is the secret satanic ritual activities of the family is sparse, because my informants have very limited knowledge of the Onassis participation. However, there are certainly plenty of tracks in the sand which indicate who the business friends of this family have been, and they have been very clearly those within the Illuminati or with connections to it.


TURKEY
The area that is now known as Turkey played a major role in the Mystery Religions. The use of drugs to create “religious” experiences was developed to a fine art by various occult fraternal mystery religion groups in the Turkey area. The Assassins from where we get the word hashish controlled parts of Turkey and Lebanon in Medieval times. They used drugs to gain the allegiance of their recruits. Some of the most powerful figures for the Illuminati have been Turks. The Grand Orient has had some powerful figures in Turkey. For instance, at the Masonic Congress of all the Grand Orients’ (that’s European Freemasonry- although several American presidents have been members of European Freemasonry) Grand Lodges, Bou Achmed came from Turkey. The Grand Lodge of Asia was represented by Sebeyck-Kadir from Asia. Bou Achmed took a big role in the Grand Orient’s decisions. As a aside, let me explain one example of the power of the Grand Orient in America.
The Grand Orient was originally strong in Louisiana but spread itself to many other US. locations. Garfield, a very powerful man in the Grand Orient, managed to become US. President because the political process got deadlocked at the convention and the Masons suggested him as a compromise candidate. Although Garfield was an extremely powerful Mason, had been perhaps the youngest general in the US. army during the Civil War, the Illuminati ordered him shot after he had served about a year in office as President. Garfield was reported by an eye-witness to Satanic rituals to have participated in the cannibalistic rites of Satanism done to gain the spiritual power of the eaten person. The Grand Orient Freemasonry has been linked to other orders of Freemasonry that are also called Rosicrucians. Pope John XXIII joined a Rosicrucian group that had links to European Freemasonry when he was in Turkey. While the secret Grand Orient Freemasonry was very strong in Turkey in spite of its small numbers, the regular American Freemasonry granted a dispensation for a Masonic Lodge to operate in Smyrna, Turkey in May, 1863 but the charters were withdrawn on Aug. 27, 1880. However, it is interesting that of all the Turkish cities, Smyrna was definitely the best place for Freemasonry to gain recruits.
Men like Achmed Pasha and many of the other Pasha family have been leaders within Freemasonry and the Illuminati. Achmed Pasha was a Satanist and had a large harem. Mehmet Talaat Pasha (1872-1921) was a Freemason and part of the Turkish revolution of 1908. He was the leader of the Young Turks, which was a joint project of the Sufis and the Frankist Satanists. (The type of Satanism led by the Frank family has had connections to Turkey for hundreds of years.) Mehmet Talaat Pasha was the Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Turkey. He was held the political position in Turkey of grand vizier of Turkey (1917-18). Another Turkish Pasha was part of the Turkish royalty running Egypt when Egypt was part of the Ottoman Empire. His name was Khedive Ismail Pasha and he was Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Egypt. It was this Turk, Khedive Ismail Pasha, who gave the famous Obelisk to the United States. This Obelisk was called Cleopatra’s Needle and was originally erected in the city of the sun, Heliopolis, about 1500 B.C.
The Obelisk is a representation of a human penis, because sun worship, worship of regeneration (sex) and worship of the sun god Satan were all tied together. Masons helped with the moving of the obelisk, and its dedication when it arrived in New York City. Large obelisks have been erected by Masons in New York, Washington D.C., Paris, the Vatican, and London. (If my memory serves me correct Berlin received one too at one time.)
Every morning when the United States President wakes up he can look out the window and see the Masonic obelisk and be reminded of who controls America. 11 the President has any training in the Mystery religion of ancient Egypt, he will also know what body part is symbolically erected in the Washington Memorial. (If the United States were ever to return to serving God, that monument would be a good one to destroy. God asked the Israelites not just simply to avoid worshipping such abominations, He asked His people to destroy them, for their very creation was abomination. This touches on the issues raised in another article in this newsletter.)
The Illuminati of Europe via the Br. East India Co. wrested control from the Great Moguls of the Opium trade during the 18th and 19th century. People connected the Br. East India Co. were responsible for the creation of the Fabian Society. The Illuminati, already headquartered in London in the 19th century, allowed John Jacob Astor (see Jan. 1, ’93 newsletter about the Astor family) beginning around 1815 to operate an opium smuggling operation. Besides Astor’s ships picking up quicksilver and lend at Gibraltar, and iron/steel from northern Europe, his ships picked up opium at Smyrna, Turkey. The opium was then sold in China.
The Onassis family was one of the top three merchant families in Smyrna. And Socrates Onassis until 1922 quietly ran a banking operation (or money laundering?) from their home which had a large amount of money left by powerful Turks. Could Socrates’ father been part of a secret Illuminati opium connection, which had begun back about 1815 with the Astor family in Smyrna, Turkey? We know for certain that he had powerful British, Italian, and Turkish friends before he was arrested in 1922, and that these friends saved his life from a death sentence. About 1925-26, his son Aristotle Onassis, who was from Smyrna, Turkey began secretly importing opium into Argentina from Turkey, under the cover and disguise of importing tobacco.
The Grand Orient of Italy by the Jewish Freemason Emannuele Carass established two secret lodges at Salonika, Turkey around the early 20th century. The dialect of the Jews in that area is often mistakenly called “crude spanish.” Actually the language is Latino a Judeo-Spanish dialect spoken in Constantinople and Smyrna. A western Ladino is spoken in Salonika (*), Bosnia, and Serbia. Masonic Jews speaking this Latino language were part of the Masonic plot that started World War I. Numerous high level Masons were informed of the coming assassination of the Archduke which a thinking person could realize what and contradiction. Actually, I would state it slightly different. His life is shrouded in smokescreens. However, there are records, documents, witnesses, etc. and it is possible to reconstruct many details about his life. I will attempt to reconstruct some of the details of that life as they pertain to his secret life as an Illuminati leader. The Illuminati is divided into the drug/porn section, the political/business management section, and the cult ritual section, global communications section, and mind-control section.
(*) Correction. Greek is spoken in Salonika, not Ladino. Salonika is a Greek city (editor's note)
The leadership within the various areas overlap. The drug/porn/political areas work together as a unit. The mind-control area seems to be somewhat technical and somewhat separate. Further, several groups have been identified as assigned the job of keeping the long range plans. The three groups that have been entrusted with long range plans are the Order of the Garter, Order of the Quest, & Keepers of the Dawn. The plans to bring in the New World Order are very detailed, and their management and safekeeping have not been haphazard. Aristotle worked within the drug/porn/political/business management area Aristotle’s power was so pervasive that some researchers of his activities concluded that he was absolutely the most powerful man on earth. This is because they were not aware of the shared power of the Illuminati “kings”. Aristotle did have world-wide power, but that appearance of power was there because he was part of Moriah (the Satanic hierarchy which controls the world.) Aristotle Onassis’ family has bad their misfortunes too.
All of the top families are in competition, and although they work together they also fight together. Even within Aristotle’s own family, a stiff long time rivalry with his brother-in-law made life difficult for everyone associated with Aristotle. And yet for all their competition, Aristotle invited Stavros Niarchos to spend time on his yacht, which Jacqueline his wife detested immensely.


ARISTOTLE LEAVES GREECE & GOES TO ARGENTINA
Aristotle’s father had planned to send him to Oxford, but the Turkish genocide of the Greek Turks changed his plans. Aristotle instead set out from Greece to Argentina. Supposedly, Aristotle landed in Argentina stateless and broke. From what I can make out it appears to be true, although it is possible he had some contacts to help the move to a foreign country. It is said that he finally found a job as a dishwasher in a bar on the corner of Corrientes & Talcahuano in Buenos Aires. Near the end of 1924, he was able to obtain a job later on with the British United River Plate Telephone Co. (Argentina was at times called the fifth British Dominion because the British Rothschilds and other British investors owned so much of Argentina.) In the next few years, Aristotle proved himself a very capable manager and with great potential as an underworld leader.
Juan Gaoana, the boss of a leading Argentine cigarette manufacturing company was the first to put in an order through Aristotle to get tobacco from Turkey via Ari’s father in Greece. This tobacco importing was the cover for Adi’s opium running. After two years, Onassis went into manufacturing cigarettes. Again this was a cover, but Onassis was out to prove himself in anyway he could, so he illegally borrowed the name of a famous Argentine brand of cigarettes called BIS, and labelled his cigarettes the same thing. The owner of BIS sued Onassis for using his company’s name and won in court. The cigarette manufacturing was clearly a losing deal, and Onassis got out of it. However, the biographies credit his cigarette manufacturing as bringing in his wealth, while at the same time acknowledging that he was losing money from them and had to dump them because they were unprofitable. Which is it? As I stated, Aristotle was running drugs into Argentina.
Aristotle states that he was penniless when he arrived in Argentina at age 21, and that he had made his first million dollars by age 23. Long story short-the facts as to where he lived, what witnesses say etc. appear to collaborate that he went from having nothing to being wealthy within those two years. His lifestyle changed dramatically. People blame his riches on the fact that he worked long hours. (I know many people who work long hours and are creative and people just don’t move up the ladder that fast by working for a phone company and selling tobacco.)

ARISTOTLE’S FRIENDS
Aristotle Onassis associated with many powerful people. The fact that he rubbed shoulders with establishment figures that tie back to the elite is nothing surprising of a person his wealth. However, it is the nature of his involvement with other Illuminati figures that reveals his position within Moriah. Before going into his Illuminati business ventures, let’s just discuss some of his friendships. An example of his visits to friends is this quote from the book Onassis. ‘The Christina’s cruises always produced items which no alert gossip columnist could miss. Onassis dropping in on Prince Alfonso Hoheiohe’s Marbella Club in southern Spain and lunching with Baron and Baroness Guy de Rothschild (amidst rumors that it was Rothschild money that had supplanted his own in Monte Carlo) was obviously a noteworthy social incident.’ (Onassis, p. 255) During W.W. II, Onassis was a regular guest of the movie mogul Spyros Skouras at Mamaroneck on Long Island. Other close friends of Onassis were the Perons of Argentina. The Perons set up a dictatorship in Argentina. The Perons have a great number of Nazi & Satanic connections/activities. If you get into studying about the Perons you will come up with names such as Josef Mengele (a Satanic Nazi Doctor), Dr. Fritz Thyssen, and Otto Skorzeny.
Onassis had sexual liaisons with Evita Peron, who was a platinum blonde. Onassis had Nazi connections that continued his whole life, as did the Peron's. For instance, one of Onassis’s Nazi associates was Hjalmar Schacht, president of Hitler’s Reichbank, who Onassis hired after the war. Schacht heiped Onassis’ shipyards in Germany build tankers after W.W. II. Until people realize that the real guiding hand behind the Nazi’s was Satanism they will continue to be misguided as to the way everything connects together at the top. For instance, John Foster Dulles was the man at Versailles Treaty who can be credited for having created the Treaty’s harsh terms against Germany that ruined Germany financially after W.W. II. And yet this same man, John Foster Dulles, was the person who secretly went to Hitler to confirm to Hitler that the elite would financially back Hitler’s rise to power.
If Hitler were anything like our image of him, Hider would have rung his neck, here before him was the man who made Germany suffer... why was Hitler friendly with this man? It makes no sense, unless people wake up to what is going on. The answer is that there is a conspiracy of those who are at the top to rule us, and to guide us toward a New World Order, and they are quite willing to sacrifice whole nations to do that. Onassis was an extremely close friend of Winston Churchill. The Freemason Winston Churchill is a descendent of a family that has been part of the elite that have secretly run the world. Winston Churchill on several occasions told Onassis that the only one he could trust in W.W. II was Joseph Stalin. (This is a far cry from the picture given in history books.) Winston Churchill spent a great deal of time on Onassis’s yacht Christina. Onassis was also friendly with Winston Churchill’s friend of Bernard Baruch. It was Bernard Baruch who convinced Winston Churchill to join the Illuminati conspiracy. He asked Churchill to come watch something important in NY in 1929, and then he showed Churchill how they could destroy the Stock Market.
That show of power brought Churchill on board. Two other Illuminati friends of Ari Onassis were Joseph Kennedy and Peter Grace, both men also belonged to top 13 Illuminati bloodlines. Gianni Agnelli, a powerful man in the Illuminati spent time on a number of occasions on Onassis’s yacht Christina while it was in the Riviera. Years before JFK became president, Onassis had JFK and Winston Churchill on his yacht at the same time. In 1928, the Illuminati men who controlled the major oil companies got together at Achnacarry Castle and formally created the Achnacarry Agreement which divided up the world into an international cartel. This is why you may have watched the same gas truck bring gas to all the different gas stations in an area, for instance, say a Sinclair station, a BP station (Rothschilds), and an Exxon station (Rockefeller). If the reader understands the world’s oil was totally in an Illuminati monopoly by 1928, it will help you understand that Aristotle, who was the man who built the largest oil tanker ships, was also Illuminati. In one year alone during the 1950s, Onassis bought 17 new tankers.

EVIDENCE OF THE CONSPIRACY
One of the most telling paper trail signs that the conspiracy has left behind was an executive order that FDR signed just after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. This executive order was a semi-secret amendment to Trading With The Enemy Act which made it LEGAL to trade with the enemy if the Sec. of the Treasury (then Hans Morganthau) gave permission. Morganthau was a tool of the conspiracy, and of course he gave permission to the top Illuminati to trade with the enemy. (In 1983, a book came out Trading With The Enemy which exposes how the elite secretly kept Hitler going by supplying him, rebuilding his communications etc. Onassis as an Illuminati king worked with other elites Rockefeller, Kennedy, and Getty, to quietly make a profit and keep the war going longer.
Onassis sold oil and guns to both sides. ITT telephones were used in German submarines. [This Executive Order shows that at the top their is a conspiracy--it is reproduced on the following pages.] There were 450 merchant ships owned by Greeks before W.W. II. Out of those Aristotle said 410 were sunk during the war. The official count was 360. Either way it is clear that most of the Greek shippers lost their large merchant ships. However, the German submarines and aircraft never once touched Aristotles’ ships although they sailed through war zones. Neither did the Allies. Aristotle alone did not suffer any losses. Aristotle’s large fleet did not lose a single ship even the ones that were in Scandinavia when the Germans invaded. Only the full collaboration at the highest levels could have pulled that one off.
The second and third pictures below are page-numbers 1396 and   1328 of the "Code of Federal regulations."
HOWARD HUGHS
Howard Hughs was a self-made millionaire and genius. Howard Hughs was not part of the system, so he was fair game to destroy. Even millionaires like Hughs and the Hunt brothers have to toe the line, or they can be taken out by the Illuminati. This doesn’t mean Howard Hughs was virtuous. Howard Hughs gave Nixon’s brother Donald a quarter million dollar “loan” (gift) in 1956 in order to continue having vice-pres. Nixon in his pocket. Hughs had been a supporter of Nixon for many years.
Onassis infiltrated his own men into Hugh’s organization. Chester Davis was from Sicily, and although he worked for Hughs, took orders from Onassis. In 1955, Hughs had obtained two doubles, one named L. Wayne Rector and the other Brooks Randie. In March, 1957 Onassis’ men at the Beverly Hills Hotel captured Howard Hughs using Hughs’ own disloyal men. Hughs was seriously hurt in the kidnapping. I believe at this point he was taken to Emerald Isle Hotel in the Bahamas. (Some of the people who are aware that Onassis captured Hughs, dispute that Hughs was taken out of the country.) The top floor was rented for the “Hughes Party”. For a month the captive Hughs was shot full of heroin, and then secretly transported to a cell on Onassis’ private island of Skorpios. Hughs two doubles stayed on under the pay of Onassis. One became Hughs, and the other became Hughs’ double.
Computer programs which can duplicate signatures were used to provide Hugh’s signature. The computer and its program used for duplicating Hughs’ signature even became public knowledge when the Los Angeles Times had an article on 1/28/71 about a computer which had been programmed to write the signature of Hughes. The Mormon Mafia that supposedly guarded Hughs actually ran the Hughs empire for Illuminatus Onassis, which accounts for the change in policies that were made by Hughs empire. It also explains why they bought up every newsreel they could find on Hughes in order to duplicate voice-prints using computers. When they were through with the double L. Wayne Rector he was shot at Rothschild’s inn on the Park, in London.
In a meeting with fellow Satanist Joseph Kennedy in September, 1957, the decision was taken to use the Mafia’s power to get John F. Kennedy elected. The Mafia was caught in Chicago tampering big time with the voting--but Nixon was denied a recount of the votes. Nixon backed off from making a fuss, because he was promised the chance to be President later. Illinois Republicans made an unofficial recount of 699 paper ballot precincts in Cook County and came up with the vote in favor of Nixon. Those votes would have changed Illinois’s electoral votes and thrown the victory to Nixon. However, Sam Giancana and his henchman Mayor Richard Daley were not about to let an official recount take place. In 1961, Joseph Kennedy had a stroke, and John Kennedy and Robert feeling their freedom, and disliking some of the powerful Illuminati like Aristotle Onassis, decided to use their popularity to destroy the conspiracy. I believe Kennedy and Robert had more courage to take on the conspiracy, due to the fact that they were familiar with it from having been (in a sense) on the inside of it during their days growing up.
However, neither son had received the Illuminati training and indoctrination that their older brother had, and when be died. Joseph made a mistake when he decided to replace Joe, Jr. with John (who they called Jack). The mistake was that John F. Kennedy may have seemed like he’d be a good Illuminati President, but he actually thought for himself. He thought for himself because he was young and with that impetuousness and vigor of youth, and with the popularity he had, he had the possibility to do some good for this nation. If I were state my evaluation, it would be to tell conservatives that they have been “hoodwinked”. John F. Kennedy did more conservative (preserving this nation) things in his Presidency than Nixon and Reagan who are heralded as conservative.
Kennedy didn’t recognize Red China, no-- that was Nixon. Kennedy didn’t triple the national debt, no, that was Reagan. The CIA has been out to get JFK, ever since they realized JFK didn’t view himself as their puppet, but that he viewed himself as their boss. The head of the CIA on purpose ruined the CIA’s chances to succeed at the Bay of Pigs. He personally prevented the CIA air cover from taking off, which the CIA knew that without air support, the operation had no chance, which was soon proved correct. in everyone’s zeal to get JFK they blamed JFK. It all sounded so believable, because the CIA were going to tell the full story. The public is not astute enough to realize that the press had subtly turned against Kennedy. Two powerful friends who liked John F. Kennedy and wanted to help JFK fight the elite were taken out before Kennedy was assassinated. Senator Estes Kefauver, whose Crime Commission had discovered the 1932 deal that Onassis, Kennedy, Meyer, Roosevelt, Lansky and other Illuminati--Mafia figures had made. Kefauver was poisoned so that he had a secret poison induced “heart attack” on Aug. 8, 1963.
One suspect that might have done it was his subordinate Bernard Fensterwald, who was also a CIA assassin. The other was Phillip Graham. His wife Katherine MEYER Graham has been a full participant of the conspiracy and shows up repeatedly in elite activities. Katherine bribed some psychiatrists to certify her husband who was editor of the Washington Post was insane. He was ordered by a judge into a mental hospital. When he was allowed to visit home on a weekend, he was found “suicided” by a shotgun. Bobby Kennedy had a good idea who shot his brother. He wrote an unpublished book called The Enemy Within, and then later he was assassinated too. Actually, the whole establishment were out to get Kennedy, and even George Bush was involved with the assassination.
The key to understanding the Illuminati is that it is headquartered in the London area. The Satanists (and witches) refer to Great Britain as the mother country Onassis had the best connections anyone could want in the British Government, as would be expected of someone of his standing in the illuminati. He had many British friends, just one example is Sir Lionel Heald, the Br. Attorney General. He attended the exclusive Br. Other Club. When W.W. II broke out on Sept. 3, ’39, Onassis was living in Savoy Hotel where the headquarters for the Illuminati’s Pilgrim Society are. The British London Times backed Onassis in his dispute with Peru over whaling. Onassis did finally get himself into trouble with illegal whaling when the nation of Norway gathered the evidence of his lulling of hundreds of whales that were illegal to hunt. Just two more quick examples of his social connections in Britain are his attendance at J.Paul Getty’s party at Sutton Place, Eng. in the ‘50s, and Onassis’ own big party for the elite on 17 June ’58 at Dorchester, England. As explained in Be Wise As Serpents, Britain’s overseas intelligence MI-6 is the Illuminati’s chief intelligence agency.
There is no way of knowing how many meetings took place dealing with the planning of the assassination of Kennedy. The first were high level Illuminati meetings. But the Illuminati meetings were not operational level meetings. There were several levels of meetings. Next, a series of meetings by British Intelligence at Tryall Compound at Montego Bay, Jamaica, and Mafia meetings at who knows where. A minor trading company called Permindex was the cover to an assassination bureau that had its major U.S. subsidiary the International Trade Mart in New Orleans. The FBI’s Division 5 was tied in with Permindex, and Permindex’s board of directors had U.N. posts, Mafia positions, European banking ties, Nazi ties, etc. In other words Permindex was well connected. By the time the planning was done, it included certain elements of the CIA and Freemasons.
A Major Louis Mortimer Bloomfield, Permindex’s Pres. & Chairman, a key player in Hoover’s Division 5, and a member of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem (the Protestant branch of the Knights of Malta) was a homosexual lover of FBI director J. Edgar Hoover. All the board of Permindex and many of its various subsidiaries were in various areas in November, 1963 carrying out the assassination and coverup. One of the covers for the Permindex operators/teams was to pose as missionaries of the American Council of Christian Churches (ACCC). The whole reason the elite set up the extensive ACCC was to have a cover for their killing units. For instance, a group of about 30 of the best marksmen were undercover as part of ACCC missionary school in Puebla, Mexico, The Tolstoy Foundation (who I have visited with] were another pseudo “Christian” front. Later, the headquarters of this assassination group was shifted to Paradise Island, Grand Bahamas to Intertel. Ian Fleming's novels write about a Third Force used to create a world government that was based in the resort islands of the Caribbean. How true that has become. In the Westerns put out by Hollywood, when the bad guy does something to the good guy, he runs off with his woman.
That is what happened with JFK. Onassis was one of the Illuminati kings who decided JFK must go, and he got to run off with the dead man’s wife. Onassis had already gotten Jackie onto his yacht, sexually, prior to Kennedy’s assassination. Franklin Roosevelt, Jr. was on board together with Aristotle and Jackie. Jackie didn’t enjoy her marriage to Onassis. At one point in their marriage when they were swimming nude at Onassis’ island Skorpios, ten photographers with underwater cameras and telephoto lens captured Jackie naked and her picture was splashed across Playmen and Hustler, etc. Jackie was furious and wanted her husband to sue the newspapers and magazines, which he refused to do A year before Aristotle died he actually admitted that he had planned the whole operation. The date given for the actual Howard Hugh’s death, who had been kept prisoner under horrendous conditions by Onassis, was Apr. 18, 1971. In the previous year 1970, Hugh’s purported autobiography had come out written by Clifford Irving. Clifford Irving’s wife took the publisher’s check made out to Howard Hugh’s to one of Onassis’s Swiss banks, and was paid.


FAMILY DIFFICULTIES
Onassis’ second wife was Tina (Athina Mary Onassis) when she divorced her husband for committing adultery said, “It is almost thirteen years since Mr. Onassis and I were married in New York City. Since then he has become one of the world’s richest men, but his wealth has not brought me happiness with him nor, as the world knows, has it brought him happiness with me.”
Tina divorced Ari and then went on to soon marry a relative of Winston Churchill, the Marques of Blandford. Later, she divorced him and married her old brother-in-law Stavros Niarchos in May, 1971. But after he killed her sister she quit him too.


EUGENIA KILLED
Eugenic, the sister-in-law of Ari Onassis, died according to the official version of an overdose of sleeping pills. Her body in the post-mortem was covered with bruises, black left eye, swelling on the left temple, a haemorrhage to the left of the larynx and so forth down the rest of her body. Let’s not. swallow the Illuminati’s propaganda to lull us into sleep about what they have done.
It might also be important to comment on the background of the Uvanos family. Both Stavros Niarchos and Aristotle Onassis married Uvanos girls.
The Uvanos family was a prominent family on the Turkish island of Chios. The island of Chios had a type of tree, mastic trees that produced an early form of chewing gum. From the word mastic is where we get the word masticate. Chios was the private property of the sultan and it was where he kept his harem. The island was given special royal treatment and allowed to have it full of chewing gum, and “booze and broads”. The Uvanos family was one of the leading families on this island.


BASIC SOURCES on ONASSIS FAMILY
  • Interviews with people, and notes from other researchers. Author’s own research.
  • Genealogy compiled from research notes of this writer Fritz Springmeier. Frischauer, Willi. Onassis. NY: Meredith Press, 1968.
  • Heymann. C. David. A Woman Named Jackie. NY: Carol Commun., 1989 Lilly, Doris. Those Fabulous Greeks Onassis. Niarchos. and Livanos. NY. Cowles Book Co., 1970.
MORE ON THE ONASSIS TOP 13 ILLUMINATI BLOODLINE and related people
Sir John Russel and his wife Lady Russel (who was a former Miss Greece were good friends of both An Onassis and his relative Stavros Niarchos. I have already written about Aristotle Onassis and Stavros Niarchos being Illuminati kingpins. The Russels would every now and then sail on Ari’s yacht for 2 week visits. This yacht was a large ship. The ship’s bar stools were upholstered out of whale scrotums. L.J. Davis’ book Onassis has a picture or these unusual bar stools after p. 112 of his book. As a further connection between the elite Russell family and Onassis, Christina Onassis’ 4th husband was Thierry Rousel, who owned not just a modelling agency and an advertising firm, but was the heir to the large pharmaceutical empire. The top Illuminati families divided up the drug trade, so this family which is so big in drugs is of course linked to the Illuminati’s drug/narcotic pharmaceutical cartel which has operated for centuries.
Rousel and Christina needed a child for their lineage so bad that it was reported that they paid $1 million to French obstetrician Michel Larvin to carry out services to help them conceive a child. There is a special program to hide the lineages of the Illuminati bloodlines. Illuminati Monarch slaves are being used as couriers to carry secret genealogical information about hundreds of Illuminati children who are being adopted out. These children do not know who their real parents are, but the records of what bloodlines they belong to are being carefully kept. The Catholic church is participating in this program to hide lineages.
If it does still seem strange that the Russell family has variant spellings to Russell such as Russel, the reader needs to understand that the elite families are trying to hide their lineages and they make many small and large changes in their last names to throw people off the track. The Illuminati have taken the art of secrecy to heights no one would ever dream. Many of the people with top 13 Blood in their veins DO NOT have last names that would give them away. I still do not know where Aristotle secretly hid his own lineage. Aristotle Onassis controlled and owned the little country of Monaco. Prince Rainier the nominal ruler of Monaco needed a wife, and Aristotle thought of getting Marilyn Monroe for him. Marilyn Monroe was a Presidential Model Monarch Sexual Slave of the Illuminati who was used to sexually service JFK and others, so the fact that Aristotle thought he could get her shows his power.
Several people close to Grace have mentioned that the wedding was an arranged wedding by others, and in fact a wedding Grace soon disliked, and felt trapped in. When Aristotle asked Marilyn what she thought of marrying the Prince she said, “Give me two days alone with him and of course he’ll want to marry me.” However, somehow Onassis was persuaded to drop Marilyn Monroe because of her image. Instead, Grace Kelly was selected to be the wife of Prince Rainier which pleased Aristotle Onassis greatly. When Prince Rainer met Grace Kelly at the Waldorf-Astoria for the first time it was at a party. They were soon found to be kissing intimately at the party and photographed by reporters. (That such intimacy happened so quickly makes me wonder if Grace wasn’t under some type of control.) Onassis gave Grace a bracelet of diamonds and rubies as a wedding gift.
Ari’s mistress Maria Callas and Grace became friends. The Prince and his wife Grace Kelly Rainier often took cruises with Onassis on his yacht Christina. Several researchers have accumulated evidence that Grace Kelly found out too many secrets about the P2 Freemasons, the Vatican and other Illuminati intrigues and that that is why she was murdered. Ralph Epperson (author of the Unseen Hand & The New World Order) gives lectures on the NWO and has a segment in his slide show which exposes Grace’s murder by the occult world. Grace Kelly, the Princess of Monaco's father was Jack. Her grandfather was John Henry Kelly and her grandmother Mary Costello. Grace’s dad’s family consisted of 10 siblings, one which died in infancy and Grace who died at age 22 on the verge of an acting career. Mary was very domineering and her husband John Henry Kelly would get away from her and have many extramarital affairs.
The children of Niary Costello Kelly, in order to cope with her dominating ways, liked fantasy. Her son George became a homosexual playwright. Her daughter tried to go into acting before she died at age 22. Her son Walter went into Vaudeville. Her son Jack (Grace Kelly’s dad) won the Olympics singles gold medal in rowing, and his cousin Paul Costello won the doubles gold metal in 1920. Jack Kelly married Margaret who had blood from German nobility in 1924. Jack soon became a very wealthy man in the Philadelphia area. He had four children, one of which was Grace Kelly. Grace Kelly’s brother Kell was forced by her father to follow in the wake of her father’s Olympic fame and to become a great sculler (rower). He won the Olympic bronze in the '56 Olympics, which pleased his father. After winning the bronze, Kell’s love affair with a transvestite was discovered, and he lost his chance for winning the election to mayor of Philadelphia. Grace as a child was in her own world and enraptured with fantasy. Because Grace was sickly, her parents would have her drink the blood from roasts.
Some of the games Grace played indicate she may have been a multiple personality. However, I don’t know if she was or not. Grace’s birthday cake one year had the wrong number of candles on it. These are the type of tricks parents who are raising disassociate children are taught to do, to enhance the confusion which enhances the mind-control. Grace went to grade school at Ravenhill (a convent) where she was taught by nuns. By the time was 15 she was a stunning beauty. She had a pristine look, which over time hid her very promiscuous life. When she went to Hollywood she ended up getting “psychiatric treatment” to help her cope with Hollywood.
Grace had many affairs including one with Bing Crosby. Grace Kelly worked for MGM. Alfred Hitchcock was the one who is credited w/ seeing a superstar in Grace. Alfred Hitchcock came from a British generational occult family, and was a dark genius who produced many exceptional films. Grace Kelly acted for three of Alfred Hitchcock’s movies. Dial “M” for Murder was the first. Later, Hitchcock visited Grace and Prince Rainer at their Paris home, and Grace made a rare public appearance in Apr. ’74 with Hitchcock in New York. Hitchcock’s life has been described by someone who knew him as “an enigma within an enigma.” Hitchcock was very secretive about his own life and his parents. We do know that he was instructed by the Jesuits at St. Ignatius College which he left in 1913. He had an extreme fascination for sadomasochism, which can be seen in his movies such as Frenzy.
Hitchcock liked to read sexual murder material, Edgar Allan Poe’s material, George Bernard Shaw’s writings, and Fabian New World Order advocate H.G. Well’s books. He also liked Grimm’s fairy tales. He was extremely fascinated by the real life murderer John Reginald Holliday Christie who could only get a sexual erection by strangling women while having sex. Hitchcock’s own personality was unpredictable. and at times was cruel and tyrannical. He enjoyed cruel jokes on people and also enjoyed psychologically breaking down his actresses. He made several movies showing split personalities such as: Shadow of a Doubt, Strangers on a Train, Psycho, and Frenzy. Hitchcock learned to create and sustain dissociation in both his murderer and the viewer audience in his films. This can be seen in his film Blackmail. The concepts about dissociation, doubles, murder as love, mirrors, sadism, and humiliating people are common items in creating monarch mind-controlled slaves. They are also common items seen in Hitchcock’s movies. I don’t know the exact connection, except to say Hitchcock was familiar with the occult world and some of their mind-control techniques. The Queen knighted Alfred Hitchcock. Hitchcock enjoyed vacationing at St. Moritz the ski resort for millionaires in Switzerland, although the only snow activities he participated in was sled rides due to his large weight. As I learn more about the Onassis clan, and the Greek/Turkish element in the Illuminati I will continue to pass it on to readers.
WHO BELIEVES MAIL ON LINE???
 

I know who was behind Bobby Kennedy's murder, by his actor friend Robert Vaughn


ROBERT VAUGHAN
When Bobby Kennedy's death was announced that day in June 1968, I cried myself to sleep. It was months before I was able to function normally again.
I had deeply admired Bobby since I was first introduced to him in 1960. Ironically, we met at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles where, eight years later, he would be assassinated.
We ran into each other again at the University of Southern California in 1965, when I was concluding work on my PhD in communications and my show, The Man From U.N.C.L.E., was at the height of its popularity.
I was asked if I would host Bobby and his wife Ethel when they visited the campus for a speech.
After that, I stayed many times at Hickory Hill, the family's estate in Virginia, with Bobby, Ethel and their children, all big U.N.C.L.E. fans.
Aristotle Onassis with Elsa Martinelli in Paris
The accused: Tycoon Aristotle Onassis and glamorous friends at a party in Paris in 1974


For years, I had been actively involved in the civil rights movement and Democratic politics, speaking out against American involvement in the Vietnam War and trying to persuade Bobby to stand against Democrat President Lyndon B. Johnson.

Indeed, a short time before Bobby announced that he would run for the Democratic nomination in 1968, he even suggested I try for a Senate seat. I was flattered.
'When you're sitting in the Oval Office having stopped the war, we'll talk again,' I said. He smiled and replied: 'We'll see.' I never saw him privately again.
Like the murder of his brother John almost five years earlier, Bobby's shooting was a watershed for America. Most people believe a lone assassin - a Palestinian refugee Sirhan Bashara Sirhan - was responsible for his death.
I shared that assumption until my continued involvement in political debate brought the real questions about Bobby's killing to my attention.
After studying documents, talking to experts and interviewing a crucial witness, I believe there is strong evidence that Bobby's killing was carried out by more than one gunman. And, more shockingly, that the Greek shipping magnate Aristotle Onassis paid for the assassination.

This is not to say there is no evidence linking Sirhan to the crime. He was seen by many people at the Ambassador Hotel firing his .22 pistol at Kennedy as the Senator walked through the kitchen on a shortcut between meetings.
Sirhan was arrested, charged and convicted of the crime. He was sentenced to die in the electric chair. But California abolished capital punishment in 1972 and today, 40 years on, Sirhan is still serving a life sentence.
So was Bobby Kennedy's shooting a non-controversial, open-and-shut case with a single, obvious suspect? Here's a summary of the facts.
Firstly, Sirhan was apparently not in the right place to fire the bullets that killed Kennedy. The autopsy shows Kennedy was shot from behind, from below, from the right and with a gun positioned no more than three inches from his head.
Yet all the eyewitnesses said they saw Sirhan between one-and-a-half and five feet in front of Kennedy - a completely different location to the one he would have needed to be in to fire the fatal shots. This information was withheld until after Sirhan's lawyers conceded his guilt.
Using the US Freedom of Information Act, Bernard Fensterwald, a Washington lawyer, obtained an FBI report on the shooting in 1976. It indicated that at least 12 bullets were fired in the hotel kitchen that evening.
Two were recovered from Bobby's body and five from the bodies of wounded bystanders. Two more passed through Kennedy's body, while three were found lodged in ceiling panels.
Robert Vaughn, left, with Bobby Kennedy, right, and Norman Topping, president of the University of Southern California, in 1965
Meeting of minds: Robert Vaughn, left, with Bobby Kennedy, right, and Norman Topping, president of the University of Southern California, in 1965
Yet the Sirhan theory relies on the notion that his gun, which held a maximum of eight bullets, was the only one fired. It just doesn't add up.
What's more, criminologist William Harper swore in an affidavit that the bullets that killed Kennedy could not have been fired by Sirhan's pistol because the ballistic characteristics did not match.
Finally, there are reasons to believe the Los Angeles police obstructed or neglected aspects of the case.
For example, although an armed security guard stated he was standing behind Kennedy at the time of the shooting - the location from which the fatal shots must have come - and even admitted dropping down and pulling his gun when the shooting began, his weapon was never checked to see if he might have fired any of the bullets that killed Kennedy, whether deliberately or accidentally.
New evidence has recently come to light. Dr Robert Joling, a past president of the American Academy of Forensic Scientists, and sound expert Philip Van Praag concluded that, based on exhaustive analysis of audio tapes from that fateful night, at least 12 shots were fired using at least two guns.
What about the mental state of Sirhan? Is it possible he could have been programmed to take the fall for Bobby's murder?
This may sound implausible, but Dr Herbert Spiegel, a New York psychiatrist who teaches at Columbia University and is considered an expert on hypnosis, supports this theory. He believes Sirhan was probably acting in response to hypnotic directives when he fired at Kennedy.
Sirhan appeared badly disorientated after his arrest, and when he was given a psychiatric examination before his trial, he was found to be susceptible to hypnotic suggestion, even climbing the bars of his cell like a monkey upon command.
In all probability, Dr Spiegel suggests, Sirhan was still in a state of hypnotically induced amnesia.
These questions continue to attract interest from a few intrepid researchers. Was there a second or even a third gunman? If so, who was it? Could the security guard behind Kennedy who admitted pulling his gun have had something to do with the killing? And, assuming that more than one gunman was involved, who was the mastermind behind the plot?
Even those most eager to blame the crime on Sirhan do not pretend he had the intellect, resources or the organisational ability to pull together an assassination conspiracy.
Investigative journalist Peter Evans suggested in his 2004 book Nemesis that Onassis was responsible in part for Kennedy's murder.
According to Evans, Onassis and Bobby first crossed paths in 1953, when Bobby became assistant counsel to Roy Cohn, the chief investigator working for Senator Joseph McCarthy's anti-Communist crusade.
Assassination of Bobby Kennedy
Riddles remain over the murder of Bobby Kennedy, pictured a moment after he was shot

One of Bobby's assignments was to study what McCarthy called the 'blood trade' between certain American allies and Red China, whose soldiers were fighting US troops in Korea.
Bobby found that more than 300 New York Greek shipping families were trading regularly with China. None of Onassis's vessels was involved, but he was afraid anyone prying into his business would discover he was secretly negotiating with Saudi Arabia to supply tankers to transport oil under the Saudi flag.
Onassis's fears were realised in October 1953 when sealed indictments were handed down to seize any ships owned by Onassis that came into an American port. He blamed Bobby for his predicament.
Despite - or perhaps because of - his resentment of Bobby, Onassis gradually became socially and romantically entangled with the Kennedy family.
He met then-Senator John F. Kennedy and his wife Jackie in 1956 when he invited them aboard his yacht, the Christina. Shortly after JFK became President, Onassis began an affair with Lee Bouvier Radziwill, Jackie's sister.
But Onassis wasn't satisfied with Lee - he wanted Jackie herself. He took advantage of the First Lady's vulnerability in August 1963, shortly after the devastating death of her two-day-old son, Patrick. Jackie accepted his invitation to stay on the Christina while she recuperated.
For Bobby, the way Onassis thrust himself into the Kennedys' personal drama heightened the hostility between them. Onassis, of course, went on to marry Jackie in October 1968, five years after JFK's death.
According to Evans, the notion of killing a Kennedy did not take shape in Onassis's mind until early 1968 when he met Mahmoud Hamshari, a follower of Yasser Arafat and a fanatical anti-American and anti-Israeli activist.
Enraged by US support for Israel during the Six Day War in 1967, Hamshari suggested killing 'a high-profile American on American soil' would make the US government 'think twice about backing the Jews'.
When Hamshari had an opportunity to meet Onassis, he used it to shake down the Greek magnate for money to carry out the plot.
Evans provides extensive detail about the dealings between Onassis and Hamshari. He describes the apparent involvement in the conspiracy of Dr William Bryan, an expert in hypnosis based in Los Angeles.
He quotes a defence witness from the trial of Sirhan describing the accused killer as being 'out of control of his consciousness and his own actions [and] subject to bizarre disassociated trances in some of which he programmed himself to be the instrument of assassination'.
And he describes pages from Sirhan's notebook, once in the possession of Christina Onassis, that seem to implicate Onassis not just in Bobby's killing but also in two other business-related murders.
Jackie Kennedy with Onassis after their 1968 wedding
Jackie Kennedy with Onassis after their 1968 wedding. His intrusion into the Kennedys' lives was deeply resented by Bobby

Then there is Hélène Gaillet, one of the players in Evans's story, whom I have interviewed myself. On an autumn afternoon in 2007, I met Helene at her apartment on New York's Upper West Side.
Statuesque and elegant, Hélène had worked as a photographer for The New York Times and New York magazine.
Hélène met Onassis for the first time at the Coach House restaurant in New York in the early Seventies. As the dinner came to a close, he raised the palms of her hands to his lips and said: 'The next time you are in Paris and need a place to stay, call me.'
In 1973, she was due to cover the fight between George Foreman and Muhammad Ali in Zaire. But when it was postponed for a month, she found herself in Paris with time on her hands.
Hélène remembered Onassis's invitation and called him. Fifteen minutes later, he invited her to his estate on the Greek island of Skorpios.
Onassis's daughter Christina was there. She was worried about her father's welfare and made Hélène promise not to take any pictures of him. Onassis was dealing with some difficult business issues, Christina said, and she was worried that any unflattering pictures would make him more vulnerable to his enemies.
During her visit to Skorpios, Hélène stayed on Onassis's yacht while he remained at his estate. One day, they went skinny-dipping and he came on to her. Helene reciprocated enthusiastically. It was the first and last time that happened between them.
A few days later, Hélène dined with Onassis at his beach house. They talked about many things, including religion. Hélène had been raised a Catholic and Ari questioned her closely, saying he was fascinated by confession and absolution.
In the course of the conversation, she asked Ari whether he agreed with Hemingway's famous remark about the difference between rich people and the rest of us - 'They have more money'.
With a laugh, Onassis replied: 'The rich get laid more, I know that ... Even that little runt Bobby Kennedy got laid more.'
More disturbingly, Onassis went on to speak freely about Bobby. According to Hélène, Onassis's hatred for him was still vivid and intense.
In the small hours, Onassis walked Helene to the beach from where a launch would take her back to the Christina. They stood together, gazing out to sea, for a long time.
After a while, Hélène realised Onassis was talking to himself, in low, murmuring tones, like someone deep in prayer.
Finally, as she strained to hear what he was saying, he turned to her and, clearly and simply, said: 'You know, Hélène, I put up the money for Bobby Kennedy's murder.'
I spent almost two hours with Hélène at her apartment. I was most impressed with her ability to place herself in the time and emotions of some of the world's most powerful and famous people and her conversations with them.
Not once did I feel that Hélène, now in her 70s, was anything but honest. I'm convinced her story is a faithful rendition of what happened to her.
Does Hélène's story settle forever the question of who killed Bobby Kennedy? Not in a legal sense and perhaps not even in a moral sense. But along with the other evidence, it makes abundantly clear that one of the greatest crimes of the 20th Century remains unresolved by the official verdict, even to this day.
• A Fortunate Life, by Robert Vaughn, is published by JR Books priced £18.99. To order your copy for £17.10 inc p&p, call the Review Bookstore on 0845 155 0713.

ZURI, WHEN A CHILD IS BORN NOTHING COMPARES TO YOU MY BABY ANGEL.

0
0

ZURI, WHEN A CHILD IS BORN NOTHING COMPARES TO YOU MY BABY ANGEL! 


Sinéad O'Connor - Nothing Compares To You

ZURI






When a Child Is Born

Performed by Sinéad O’Connor and Danny O’Reilly & & the RTE Concert Orchestra.



Lyrics  by Daniel O'Donnell

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0GxEvNIHZg

Presented by Kaamilah Bint Qadar (Kate Bates)



A ray of hope flickers in the sky
A tiny star lights up way up high
All across the land dawns a brand new morn'
This comes to pass when a child is born.

Asilent wish sails the seven seas
The winds of change whisper in the trees
And the walls of doubt crumble, tossed and torn
This comes to pass when a child is born.

Arosey hue settles all around
You got the feel, you're on solid ground
For a spell or two no-one seems forlorn
This comes to pass when a child is born.

(Spoken)
And all of this happens because the world is waiting
Waiting for one child, black, white, yellow - no one knows
But a child that will grow up and turn tears to laughter
Hate to love, war to peace and everyone to everyone's neighbour
And misery and suffering will be words to be forgotten, forever.



(Sung)
It's all a dream, an illusion now
It must come true sometime soon, somehow
All across the land dawns a brand new morn'
This comes to pass when a child is born.

This comes to pass when a child is born...



 

 




With Much Love from Dada Basheer, Dadi Kaamilah and our Grand daughters.
 
 



 Sinéad O'Connor "A New Born Child"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngVHtE-iZSQ





PEOPLE'S GOVERNMENT SAYS THEY ARE INCOMPETENT AND NEEDS TO PRIVATISE!

0
0
PEOPLE'S GOVERNMENT SAYS THEY ARE INCOMPETENT AND NEEDS TO PRIVATISE!


Russell Brand The Trews (E208)

People's Government says : Do not trust us for running public services because we are incompretent (SHIT) and only profit-making individuals and corporations can guarantee people's health and welfare! 


  
Guess Who Profits From Selling Off NHS: Russell Brand The Trews (E208)



179,565
Published on 10 Dec 2014
Russell Brand The Trews (E208).

Reaction to news that a £1billion contract - the biggest ever in the history of the NHS - is out for tender to private companies.

Sign the petition and get involved with your local community http://www.38degrees.org.uk/page/s/Pr...
http://www.keepournhspublic.com/index...
Subscribe Here Now: http://tinyurl.com/opragcg and send links to video news items of topical stories that you'd like me to analyse.

Produced directed & edited by Gareth Roy.
Trews Theme by The Rubberbandits
Thanks to Jimi Mackay: @jimimackay
and Urban Nerds: @urban_nerds for our creative services




Palestinian minister struck during altercation with IDF, dies in hospital (EXCLUSIVE)

<a href="/channel/UCpwvZwUam-URkxB7g4USKpg" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-name="" data-sessionlink="ei=RfCOVNcHisVzkoWB8A4" data-ytid="UCpwvZwUam-URkxB7g4USKpg">RT</a>

HYPOCRITICAL EUROPEAN UNION PARLIAMENT GOES TO HELL OVER PALESTINE!

0
0
Veterans Today

EU Parliament recognizes Palestine as independent state

If Israel's response is "Go to Hell"... will sanctions be the next logical step?

Members of the European Parliament take part in a voting session in Strasbourg, eastern France, December 17, 2014
Members of the European Parliament take part in a voting session in Strasbourg, eastern France, December 17, 2014

“We must begin hunting down all those involved in manufacturing and pedaling these psyops constructs to make them pay for their misdeeds.” … Jim W. Dean

Top Daily Story  …  Press TV,  Tehran


There will be no peace without sanctions forcing Israel to do so
There will be no peace without sanctions forcing Israel to do so
[Editor’s Note:  The worm is turning on Israel and I expect the militant Zionists will get more dangerous. Red alerts will be going up for false flag attacks everywhere as catching the Likuds and their overseas friends red handed could provide a knockout punch opportunity for a full sanctions response.

Any Intel agencies that are aware of planned attacks and let them happen risk getting exposed by other Intel agencies who consider that aiding and abetting terrorism.
This will have no effect on our US Congress which has been purchased as the last redoubt for Israeli extremists, which I define as insisting that they are above anyone else’s rules, including espionage laws, money laundering, blackmail, human trafficking, nuclear proliferation…and terrorism, etc. It is a long list, which includes making other people pay for things they want.

On another note the EU court decertified Hamas as a terrorist organization. We will see if the EU replaces them with Israel. Bib is having a fit, and we should be hearing more about the Sampson option. It was quite an irony to see the court lambaste what the original listing decision was based upon:

“The General Court finds that the contested measures are based not on acts examined and confirmed in decisions of competent authorities, but on factual imputations derived from the press and the Internet,” it said.

This folks is a string that we must pull further as these false constructs pedaled over mass media and the internet are an epidemic now. Most are professional psyops like the Architects and Engineers crowd shilling the 9-11 nanothermite hustle when VT confirmed with the “owners” of nanothermite that it had only been produced as a lab sample and nothing else done because it had no commercial value.

Was nanothermite found in the dust samples by the “I Spy” A&E guys?  Sure, but it was also a known byproduct fingerprint of a nuclear explosion, along with the obvious spikes in tritium and other nuclear components. This all was confirmed by IAEA and the Sandia Labs source that wrote the 2003 report.

So now is not the time to just celebrate these recent changes, but to go back and begin hunting down all those involved in manufacturing and pedaling these psyops constructs and see that they pay for their misdeeds. To not punish them now that they have been discredited just invites more abuse as a no lose, no penalty game for the perpetrators… Jim W. Dean]
 _____________________________

 –  First published  …  December 17,  2014  -


European Israeli pressure groups suffer a huge defeat with Palestinian vote
European Israeli pressure groups suffer a huge defeat with Palestinian vote

In a move that will further increase Israel’s outcries, the European Parliament (EP) has voted in favor of recognizing Palestine as an independent state. 

In a Wednesday voting, 496 members of the EP voted for the recognition motion, 88 voted against with 111 abstentions.

Based on the motion, the European Union must “unconditionally” recognize Palestine as an independent state. This comes as Palestinian authorities say they will press ahead with their efforts at the United Nations (UN) to seek official statehood despite a joint US-Israeli bid to stymie the attempts.
The recognition vote follows similar votes by a few European countries legislatures including those of France, Britain, Spain and Portugal that call on their respective governments to recognize Palestinian statehood.

The Palestinians want the borders of the future state of Palestine to be based on the pre-1967 lines. In 1967, Israel occupied the West Bank, East Jerusalem al-Quds and the Gaza Strip. However, Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005 and has put it under siege since 2007.


AKBAR BRITAIN - Cruel Britannia, a secret history of torture by IAN COBAIN.

0
0

 ALLAH IS NOT AKBAR, BRITAIN, US, ISRAEL AND EUROPE ARE!!!

Cruel Britannia: a secret history of torture

The hidden story of Britain's torture record has been told for the first time, a hand grenade into the heart of the establishment.
Cruel Britannia: a secret history of torture, Ian Cobain, Portobello Books.



In 2006, Cpl Donald Payne was the first British soldier to be convicted of a war crime in this country under the International Criminal Court Act 2001. His crime was the inhuman and degrading treatment of prisoners held by British Forces in Southern Iraq in September 2003. He received a year in jail and was dismissed from the British Army for his crime. However, whereas a foot soldier who is complicit in torture is sent to jail – as the book reveals, for those higher up the social spectrum a CBE, knighthood or peerage await. Such is the hypocrisy in the British history of torture

If that sounds like an unlikely or extreme thing to say, I can only respond by saying read Cruel Britannia by Ian Cobain.

His book is a remarkable narrative and will come as something of a shock to most readers who are taken in by Britain’s image of fair play and decency abroad. This is a myth, as Cobain explosively demonstrates. When the publishers sent me the manuscript I wrote to them that it was like hand grenade rolled into the heart of the British Establishment. Here is why.

Firstly, the book is explosive because it reveals direct participation by the United Kingdom in torture since 1944. This probably will come as a great surprise to many readers but the official line that “the British do not participate in torture”, is revealed as just part of a deliberate and well-practised line of deceit. The book charts the use of torture from “the Cage” in London used to interrogate leading Nazi’s at the end of the Second World War, through the colonial campaigns of Kenya, Cyprus and Aden and then makes the link to Northern Ireland, Iraq and Afghanistan with the repeated and wilful use of “the five techniques”. It exposes the exceptional brutality of the British in the treatment of the Mau Mau in Kenya - as is just beginning to emerge in the case of Nzili, Nyingi and Mara, currently being heard in the High Court.

Evidence reveals that one British policeman at the time described the conditions in the camps as “far worse than anything I experienced in my four and a half years as a prisoner of the Japanese”. To hear the British described as being more brutal than the Japanese will come as a great shock but, should there be any doubt as to the depravity of British Forces, the description in the book is unequivocal

Men were whipped, clubbed, subjected to electric shocks, mauled by dogs and chained to vehicles before being dragged around. Some were castrated. The same instruments used to crush testicles were used to remove fingers. It was far from un-common for men to be beaten to death” 

If this still does not convince any reader then, if they can get to London, I suggest they go to the High Court to hear it for themselves.

This savagery by the British continues throughout the colonial period and Cobain details the campaigns in Cyprus against EOKA and in the Aden Emergency where yet more torture was perpetrated on those we captured. The book then makes interesting references to the refinement of torture techniques which were developed in between 1950-1970 known as an “assault on the mind” whereby far subtler techniques capable of causing “irreparable psychological damage” were developed. The scientists found that a combination of five things: sensory deprivation through hooding, together with enforced stress positions, white noise, sleep prevention and very little food together produced “stress that was almost unbearable for most subjects”.   

This resulted in what became known as the “five techniques” which were subsequently employed against the IRA during interment in 1971 and later banned in the case of Ireland v UKin the European Court of Human Rights in 1978. Yet, despite the assurances of the British Government that such practises would never again be repeated in any circumstances, Cobain makes the very alarming claim that the five techniques were in fact retained by the UK which is, perhaps, why they re-emerged in Iraq in 2003 and why the doctrine cited by the Intelligence Branch during the second Iraq War miraculously went missing when it came to the Baha Mousa trial in 2006 and the Inquiry two years later.

The second reason why the book is explosive is because it exposes the institutional cover up that has been perpetrated throughout the post war years. At the time of writing this article there is a sense of national outrage at what appears to be an institutional cover up over Hillsborough and connivance by numerous institutions in the Savile affair. Indeed, it seems to be a national trait that there are so many institutions and individuals who are prepared to participate, passively or actively, in a cover up of scandals for something as prosaic as enhancing their own career prospects or reward from the State.
The ‘Establishment’ is shown to be remarkably adept at not establishing the truth using methods every bit as subtle as those developed by the interrogators in the 1950’s – 70. At the same time, the book reveals the courage of a few men and women who stand against torture. Men such as Colonel Arthur Young who repeatedly complained to Sir Evelyn Baring about the “unjustified or abhorrent crimes by British Forces” in Kenya but who resigned when he realised that Baring and others were not interested in his complaints. Or Lord Gardiner, who spelt out the legal position that the five techniques were a flagrant breach of International and domestic law but who was similarly ignored lest it get in the way of an interrogator’s war. At the same time, the few good men who do speak out know what fate will befall them. Craig Murray was drummed out of the Foreign Office for revealing Foreign Office connivance with torture evidence and Ben Griffin, the former SAS Trooper who spoke out against the UK treatment of prisoners in Afghanistan, is now living under a Government injunction which prevents him from speaking any further. If he breaks the terms of the injunction he will go to jail. In Cruel Britanniayou can lose your job or go to jail for revealing UK complicity in torture and rendition. Those who are complicit meanwhile remain untouched and untroubled. The only tap on the shoulder is the sword used to knight them.

Finally, the most explosive part of the book is the fact that complicity in torture and rendition are potentially war crimes and are required to be outlawed in our domestic criminal law. The UN Convention against torture (UNCAT) states:

“each State Party shall ensure that all acts of torture are offences under its criminal law. The same shall apply to an attempt to commit torture and to an act by any person which constitutes complicity or participation in torture”.

If such acts are committed during armed conflict then they constitute a war crime or, in the case of rendition, a crime against humanity. However, to date despite increasingly weighty evidence no one has been prosecuted. As the Tory MP David Davis recently stated in the case of R v Ahmed and others
“Although the combined circumstantial evidence of complicity in all these cases is overwhelming, it has not so far been possible — because of the government’s improper use of state secrecy to cover up the evidence — to establish absolutely clear sequences of cause and effect.”

And here lies the rub. As the weight of evidence mounts up, so the State becomes increasingly desperate to cover up. Miliband (D) pirouettes in the High Court, Straws denies any involvement in rendition before his assurances are contradicted by the discovery of documents in Tripoli. Then up  pops the so called “Justice and Security Bill” - currently making its way through Parliament - in a desperate, blanket attempt to cover up all UK complicity in torture and rendition. However, the more attempts there are to cover it up the more the issue is exposed and it must be the supreme irony that as details of torture are finally being exposed from Kenya, the Government is embarking on yet another cover up.

This is why Cobain’s allegations in Cruel Britannia are like a hand grenade in the heart of the establishment. The truth has had the pin pulled out of it by this book and is likely to go off at any moment. When it does, it will not only be the foot soldiers who end up being caught in the explosive consequences.

The Reverend Nicholas Mercer (formerly Lieutenant-Colonel Nicholas Mercer) was the Liberty Human Rights Lawyer of the Year 2011-2012 for integrity and courage in the face of dissembling and denial of human rights abuses by British forces in Iraq.

About the author
The Reverend Nicholas Mercer (formerly Lieutenant-Colonel Nicholas Mercer) was the Liberty Human Rights Lawyer of the Year 2011-2012 for integrity and courage in the face of dissembling and denial of human rights abuses by British forces in Iraq.

The UK cannot block non-European Union family members from entering the country

0
0

UK cannot block non-EU family

Press Association
The UK cannot block non-European Union family members from entering the country without a travel permit, EU judges have ruled, in a decision which potentially opens Britain's borders to large numbers of non-EU nationals.

The complicated case centres on Sean McCarthy, a dual British and Irish national living and working in Spain, and his wife, Patricia McCarthy Rodriguez, a Colombian citizen. They have two young children who are both British citizens.

Mrs McCarthy claimed she should be allowed to travel to the UK with her British family without having to obtain a British visa as she holds an EU Residence Card issued by the Spanish government.

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Luxembourg, which interprets EU law, ruled in the McCarthys' favour, saying freedom of movement rules do not allow measures which stop family members from entering a member state without a visa, adding that the rules are for general grounds of preventing abuse.
Conservative and Ukip MEPs reacted with outrage at the decision.

Conservative MEP Timothy Kirkhope, spokesman on justice and home affairs, said: " Britain will always be best placed to decide and deal with its own immigration needs - not a judge in Luxembourg.

"We must have a system robust enough to prevent abuse and flexible enough to assess each case on its merits. Most of all we need a visa system controlled by the UK and not the EU."

The British Government has until now required Mrs McCarthy to obtain a "family permit" visa every six months if she wants to travel to the UK.

Mrs McCarthy has to go from Marbella to the British Embassy in Madrid to be fingerprinted and complete detailed application forms every time she wants to travel to the UK.

The process takes several weeks, even months, her lawyers said.

The McCarthys took action against the UK Government under the European Union's freedom of movement rules, arguing that Mrs McCarthy should not have to apply for a visa every time she wants to travel.

The win could potentially open Britain's borders to large numbers of non-EU nationals who live with EU citizens who have exercised their freedom of movement rights across the continent.

Mr McCarthy said: " I'm overjoyed at the news from Luxembourg. It's been a five-year battle for our family to be treated fairly and with dignity by the UK.

"As a British national I had expected my country to play by the rules, and now the court has finally forced the UK to respect British and European citizens' free movement rights." 

Conservative MP Dominic Grieve, when he was attorney general, tried to argue that the UK was entitled to invoke the visa regime to allay concerns about other EU member states' residence cards, as some allegedly do not meet international security standards and are open to abuse.

But UK legislation requires an entry permit to be obtained before entry into the UK even where the authorities do not consider that the family member of an EU citizen may be involved in an abuse of rights or fraud.

ECJ judges said the fact that a member state is faced with a high number of cases of abuse of rights or fraud committed by non-EU nationals - as the UK claims - cannot justify a sweeping measure to exclude family members of EU citizens.

The judges said the UK is able to assess documentation for signs of fraud or abuse at the border and if fraud is proven they can exclude an individual.

But they added that the UK is " not permitted to determine the conditions for entry of persons who have a right of entry under EU law or to impose upon them extra conditions for entry or conditions other than those provided for by EU law". 

A Government spokesman said: " The UK is disappointed with the judgment in this case. It is right to tackle fraud and the abuse of free movement rights.

"As the case is still to return to the UK's High Court for a final judgment, it would be inappropriate to comment further at this time."

Britain is bound by the ECJ ruling. 

Free movement rules have been at the heart of the debate over immigration in Britain and whether the country should remain a member of the EU.

Last month, David Cameron promised tough new restrictions to stem the flow of EU citizens to Britain, including a block on EU migrants claiming welfare for the first four years after they arrive in the country.

However, the Prime Minister insisted he rules ''nothing out'' if British demands for change fall on deaf ears, and warned that welfare reforms will be an ''absolute requirement'' in the renegotiation that would be held ahead of his planned referendum on EU membership.

Ukip MEP and spokesman on immigration Steven Woolfe said the ECJ ruling strikes another blow against the UK's power to control its borders.

Mr Woolfe said: "Britain will be forced to recognise residence permits issued by any EU member state, even though the system of permits is wide open to abuse and fraud.

"This ruling extends the so-called 'right to free movement' to millions of people from anywhere in the world who don't have citizenship of any country of the EU.

"This is yet more proof that Britain can never take back control of its borders as long as it remains in the European Union."

He went on: " This makes claims by David Cameron that he can control migration from within the EU look even more absurd.

"The ECJ, like every other EU institution, is determined that Britain will never take back control of its borders. That is a non-negotiable principle of the European treaties. For Cameron to pretend otherwise is naive or dishonest or both."

Related video
RUSSEL BRAND & NIGEL FARAGE CLASH OVER IMMIGRATION

View Photo
Russell Brand criticised Ukip leader Nigel Farage when the pair appeared on Question …
Russell Brand was exposed as a "messiah with feet of clay" in his Question Time clash with Nigel Farage, the Ukip leader has claimed.
The comedian condemned Mr Farage as a "pound shop Enoch Powell" on the BBC1 show last night, which saw the two field questions from a studio audience on immigration, schools and Brand's anti-politics campaign.
And both took to the internet to continue trading insults after filming was complete.
Writing on his blog, Revolution author Brand said Mr Farage was " worse than stagnant, he is a tribute act, he is a nostalgic spasm for a Britain that never was; an infinite cricket green with no-one from the colonies to raise the game, grammar schools on every corner and shamed women breastfeeding under giant parasols".
He accused the Ukip leader of trading on fear, claiming that in an unbroadcast section Mr Farage had backed parents' right to smack their children on the grounds that: "It's good for them to be afraid."
Brand said: "There is a lot of fear about in our country at the moment and he is certainly benefiting from it. But the Britain I love is unafraid and brave. We have a laugh together, we take care of one another, we love an underdog and we unite to confront bullies."
He added: "Nigel Farage in the flesh - gin-blossomed flesh that it is - inspires sympathy more than fear, an end of the pier, end of the road, end of days politician, who like many people who drink too much has a certain sloppy sadness."
Meanwhile, Mr Farage wrote on the Independent website that the "sometime comedian turned banker-basher" had been "limp".
He added: "Maybe it was the ChapStick that his make-up artist applied to his lips at the last moment, but he didn't seem to utter a word of sense.
"Mr Brand will swan around and tout long-discredited, even conspiratorial, theories about the City of London, and 'who owns politicians' - but actually he had very little to give."
Both were disparaging about the Question Time format - which pitted them against Conservative Penny Mordaunt, Labour's Mary Creagh and journalist Camilla Cavendish.
Mr Farage said it was "all a little formulaic", while Brand described it as "a pantomime... a timid and tepid debate where the topics and dynamism of the discussion are as wooden and flat as the table we gamely sit around".
Both agreed that the most vital contributions came from the audience, including one man who challenged Brand to stand for Parliament and a woman who told Mr Farage that immigration was a side-issue which should not dominate the political debate.
Brand said "the only worthwhile sentiments, be they raging or insightful, come from the audience".
Mr Farage said audience members had expressed "sensible" ideas on immigration, grammar schools and the NHS.
He said: "People are attracted to Mr Brand's 'I'll rant and rave but never stand for Parliament myself' politics. Don't vote. Don't engage. What's the point?
"You can see the logic. But morally, you can't really justify it... This isn't the way politics is done in this country. And I'll be damned if a chest-hair obsessed Hollywood type tries to tell us it is.
"T he messiah has feet of clay, and the revolution is not occurring on Mr Brand's side - it's happening with Ukip, and it's happening fast."

DR KEVIN BARRETT'S TRUTHJIHAD.COM BLOG 40 STORIES INCLUDING 15 FALSE FLAGS

0
0

If you like this blog

Don't miss Kevin Barrett's radio shows! And visit TruthJihad.com for more...

Thursday, December 18, 2014


FFWN: Sydney, Pakistan, Sony false flags & much more!

This week's FFWN almost got pre-empted when Frontier internet service collapsed in south central Wisconsin just minutes before the show. So I had to broadcast from a local café, with the show beginning 45 minutes late. (Then when I got home an unmarked black helicopter flew back and forth overhead about a quarter-mile to the west.) Just another exciting day at False Flag Weekly News!

Just to spite the bastards, we did a full hour show and reported on 40 stories, including 15 in the False Flag category..



Links to all the stories: http://noliesradio.org/archives/92976


OBAMA DECLARES WAR ON PAKISTAN 2009 by WEBSTER G. TARPLEY

0
0

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sl7ojcIj8E

CIA Torture - Guantanamo Prisoner Lifts The Lid: Russell Brand The Trews (E211)

Published on 15 Dec 2014
Russell Brand The Trews (E211).
I talk to former Guantanamo Bay detainee Moazzam Begg about the CIA torture revelations, Britain's involvement in it and his experiences during three years of false imprisonment.

Subscribe Here Now: http://tinyurl.com/opragcg and send links to video news items of topical stories that you'd like me to analyse.

Produced directed & edited by Gareth Roy.
Trews Theme by The Rubberbandits
Thanks to Jimi Mackay: @jimimackay
and Urban Nerds: @urban_nerds for our creative services

Sunday, December 13, 2009


Tarpley: "Obama declares war on Pakistan"

Tuesday, December 15th, 9 a.m. - 10 a.m. Pacific (noon - 1 pm Eastern) on Fair and Balanced, http://www.noliesradio.org, to be archived a few hours later here: Webster Tarpley, author of 9/11 Synthetic Terror, two Obama exposes, Surviving the Cataclysm, and other books.

Webster Tarpley is one of the most important geopolitical analysts of our time. His brand-new article "Obama Declares War on Pakistan" rips the veil off the covert Anglo-American war against Pakistan. I am posting the entire article below, since it is brand-new and I can't find it posted elsewhere yet.

OBAMA DECLARES WAR ON PAKISTAN


By Webster G. Tarpley

Washington DC, Dec. 11 -- Obama’s West Point speech of December 1 represents far more than the obvious brutal escalation in Afghanistan -- it is nothing less than a declaration of all-out war by the United States against Pakistan. This is a brand-new war, a much wider war now targeting Pakistan, a country of 160 million people armed with nuclear weapons. In the process, Afghanistan is scheduled to be broken up. This is no longer the Bush Cheney Afghan war we have known in the past. This is something immensely bigger: the attempt to destroy the Pakistani central government in Islamabad and to sink that country into a chaos of civil war, Balkanization, subdivision and general mayhem. The chosen strategy is to massively export the Afghan civil war into Pakistan and beyond, fracturing Pakistan along ethnic lines. It is an oblique war using fourth-generation or guerrilla warfare techniques to assail a country which the United States and its associates in aggression are far too weak to attack directly. In this war, the Taliban are employed as US proxies. This aggression against Pakistan is Obama's attempt to wage the Great Game against the hub of Central Asia and Eurasia or more generally.

US DETERRED FROM OPEN WAR BY PAKISTAN’S NUKES

The ongoing civil war in Afghanistan is merely a pretext, a cover story designed to provide the United States with a springboard for a geopolitical destabilization campaign in the entire region which cannot be publicly avowed. In the blunt cynical world of imperialist aggression à la Bush and Cheney, a pretext might have been manufactured to attack Pakistan directly. But Pakistan is far too large and the United States is far too weak and too bankrupt for such an undertaking. In addition, Pakistan is a nuclear power, possessing atomic bombs and medium range missiles needed to deliver them. What we are seeing is a novel case of nuclear deterrence in action. The US cannot send an invasion fleet or set up airbases nearby because Pakistani nuclear weapons might destroy them. To this extent, the efforts of Ali Bhutto and A.Q. Khan to provide Pakistan a deterrent capability have been vindicated. But the US answer is to find ways to attack Pakistan below the nuclear threshold, and even below the conventional threshold. This is where the tactic of exporting the Afghan civil war to Pakistan comes in.

The architect of the new Pakistani civil war is US Special Forces General Stanley McChrystal, who organized the infamous network of US torture chambers in Iraq. McChrystal’s specific credential for the Pakistani civil war is his role in unleashing the Iraqi civil war of Sunnis versus Shiites by creating “al Qaeda in Iraq” under the infamous and now departed double agent Zarkawi. If Iraqi society as a whole had lined up against the US invaders, the occupiers would have soon been driven out. The counter-gang known as “Al Qaeda in Iraq” avoided that possibility by killing Shiites, and thus calling forth massive retaliation in the form of a civil war. These tactics are drawn from the work of British General Frank Kitson, who wrote about them in his book Low Intensity Warfare. If the United States possesses a modern analog to Heinrich Himmler of the SS, it is surely General McChrystal, Obama’s hand-picked choice. McChrystal’s superior, Gen Petraeus, wants to be the new Field Marshal von Hindenburg – in other words, he wants to be the next US president.

The vulnerability of Pakistan which the US and its NATO associates are seeking to exploit can best be understood using a map of the prevalent ethnic groups of Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, and India. Most maps show only political borders which date back to the time of British imperialism, and therefore fail to reflect the principal ethnic groups of the region. For the purposes of this analysis, we must start by recognizing a number of groups. First is the Pashtun people, located mainly in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Then we have the Baluchis, located primarily in Pakistan and Iran. The Punjabis inhabit Pakistan, as do the Sindhis. The Bhutto family came from Sind.

PASHTUNISTAN

The US and NATO strategy begins with the Pashtuns, the ethnic group from which the so-called Taliban are largely drawn. The Pashtuns represent a substantial portion of the population of Afghanistan, but here they are alienated from the central government under President Karzai in Kabul, even though the US puppet Karzai passes for a Pashtun himself. The issue involves the Afghan National Army, which was created by the United States after the 2001 invasion. The Afghan officer corps are largely Tajiks drawn from the Northern Alliance that allied with the United States against the Pashtun Talibans. The Tajiks speak Dari, sometimes known as eastern Persian. Other Afghan officers come from the Hazara people. The important thing is that the Pashtuns feel shut out.

The US strategy can best be understood as a deliberate effort at persecuting, harassing, antagonizing, strafing, repressing, and murdering the Pashtuns. The additional 40,000 US and NATO forces which Obama demands for Afghanistan will concentrate in Helmand province and other areas where the Pashtuns are in the majority. The net effect will be to increase the rebellion of the fiercely independent Pashtuns against Kabul and the foreign occupation, and at the same time to push many of these newly radicalized mujaheddin fighters across the border into Pakistan, where they can wage war against the central government in Islamabad. US aid will flow directly to war lords and drug lords, increasing the centrifugal tendencies.

On the Pakistani side, the Pashtuns are also alienated from the central government. Islamabad and the army are seen by them as too much the creatures of the Punjabis, with some input from the Sindhis. On the Pakistani side of the Pashtun territory, US operations include wholesale assassinations from unmanned aerial vehicles or drones, murders by CIA and reportedly Blackwater snipers, plus blind terrorist massacres like the recent ones in Peshawar which the Pakistani Taliban are blaming on Blackwater, acting as a subcontractor of the CIA. These actions are intolerable and humiliating for a proud sovereign state. Every time the Pashtuns are clobbered, they blame the Punjabis in Islamabad for the dirty deals with the US that allow this to happen. The most immediate goal of Obama’s Afghan-Pakistan escalation is therefore to promote a general secessionist uprising of the entire Pashtun people under Taliban auspices, which would already have the effect of destroying the national unity of both Kabul and Islamabad.

BALUCHISTAN

The other ethnic group which the Obama strategy seeks to goad into insurrection and secession is the Baluchis. The Baluchis have their own grievances against the Iranian central government in Tehran, which they see as being dominated by Persians. An integral part of the new Obama policy is to expand the deadly flights of the CIA Predators and other assassination drones into Baluchistan. One pretext for this is the report, peddled for example by Michael Ware of CNN, that Osama bin Laden and his MI-6 sidekick Zawahiri are both holed up in the Baluchi city of Quetta, where they operate as the kingpins of the so-called “Quetta Shura.” Blackwater teams cannot be far behind. In Iranian Baluchistan, the CIA is funding the murderous Jundullah organization, which was recently denounced by Teheran for the murder of a number of top officials of the Iranian Pasdaran Revolutionary guards. The rebellion of Baluchistan would smash the national unity of both Pakistan and Iran, thus helping to destroy two of the leading targets of US policy.

OBAMA’S RUBE GOLDBERG STRATEGY

Even Chris Matthews of MSNBC, normally a devoted acolyte of Obama, pointed out that the US strategy as announced at West Point very much resembles a Rube Goldberg contraption. (In the real world, “al Qaeda” is of course the CIA’s own Arab and terrorist legion.) In the world of official US myth, the enemy is supposed to be “Al Qaeda.” But, even according to the US government, there are precious few “Al Qaeda” fighters left in Afghanistan. Why then, asked Matthews, concentrate US forces in Afghanistan where “Al Qaeda” is not, rather than in Pakistan where “Al Qaeda” is now alleged to be?

One elected official who has criticized this incongruous mismatch is Democratic Senator Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, who said in a television interview that ‘Pakistan, in the border region near Afghanistan, is perhaps the epicenter [of global terrorism], although al Qaida is operating all over the world, in Yemen, in Somalia, in northern Africa, affiliates in Southeast Asia. Why would we build up 100,000 or more troops in parts of Afghanistan included that are not even near the border? You know, this buildup is in Helmand Province. That's not next door to Waziristan. So I'm wondering, what exactly is this strategy, given the fact that we have seen that there is a minimal presence of Al Qaida in Afghanistan, but a significant presence in Pakistan? It just defies common sense that a huge boots on the ground presence in a place where these people are not is the right strategy. It doesn't make any sense to me.’ Indeed. ‘The Wisconsin Democrat also warned that U.S. policy in Afghanistan could actually push terrorists and extremists into Pakistan and, as a consequence, further destabilize the region: "You know, I asked the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mullen, and Mr. Holbrooke, our envoy over there, a while ago, you know, is there a risk that if we build up troops in Afghanistan, that will push more extremists into Pakistan?" he told ABC. "They couldn't deny it, and this week, Prime Minister Gilani of Pakistan specifically said that his concern about the buildup is that it will drive more extremists into Pakistan, so I think it's just the opposite, that this boots-on-the-ground approach alienates the Afghan population and specifically encourages the Taliban to further coalesce with Al Qaida, which is the complete opposite of our national security interest."’[1] Of course, this is all intentional and motivated by US imperialist raison d’état. .

MALICK: “DID OBAMA DECLARE WAR ON PAKISTAN?”

Obama’s speech did everything possible to blur the distinction between Afghanistan and Pakistan, which are after all two sovereign states and both members of the United Nations in their own right. Ibrahim Sajid Malick, US correspondent for Samaa TV, one of the largest Pakistan television networks, called attention to this ploy: ‘Speaking to a hall full of cadets at the US Military Academy of West Point, President Barack Obama almost seemed like he might be declaring war on Pakistan. Every time he mentioned Afghanistan, Pakistan preceded mention…. Sitting at the back benches of the hall at one point I almost jumped out of my chair when he said: “the stakes are even higher within a nuclear-armed Pakistan, because we know that al Qaeda and other extremists seek nuclear weapons, and we have every reason to believe that they would use them.” I was shocked because a succession of American officials recently confirmed that the Pakistani arsenal is secure.’[2] This article is entitled “Did Obama Declare War On Pakistan?”, and we can chalk the question mark up to diplomatic discretion. During congressional hearings involving General McChrystal and US Ambassador Eikenberry, Afghanistan and Pakistan were simply fused into one sinister entity known as “Afpak” or even “Afpakia.”

In the summer of 2007, Obama, coached by Zbigniew Brzezinski and other controllers, was the originator of the unilateral US policy of using Predator drones for political assassinations inside Pakistan. This assassination policy is now being massively escalated along with the troop strength: “Two weeks ago in Pakistan, Central Intelligence Agency sharpshooters killed eight people suspected of being militants of the Taliban and Al Qaeda, and wounded two others in a compound that was said to be used for terrorist training…. The White House has authorized an expansion of the C.I.A.’s drone program in Pakistan’s lawless tribal areas, officials said this week, to parallel the president’s decision…to send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan. American officials are talking with Pakistan about the possibility of striking in Baluchistan for the first time — a controversial move since it is outside the tribal areas — because that is where Afghan Taliban leaders are believed to hide.”[3] The US is now training more Predator operators than combat pilots.

BLACKWATER ACCUSED IN PESHAWAR MASSACRE OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN

The CIA, the Pentagon, and their various contractors among the private military firms are now on a murder spree across Pakistan, attacking peaceful villages and wedding parties, among other targets. Blackwater, now calling itself Xe Services and Total Intelligence Solutions, is heavily involved: ‘At a covert forward operating base run by the US Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) in the Pakistani port city of Karachi, members of an elite division of Blackwater are at the center of a secret program in which they plan targeted assassinations of suspected Taliban and Al Qaeda operatives, "snatch and grabs" of high-value targets and other sensitive action inside and outside Pakistan, an investigation by The Nation has found. The Blackwater operatives also assist in gathering intelligence and help direct a secret US military drone bombing campaign that runs parallel to the well-documented CIA predator strikes, according to a well-placed source within the US military intelligence apparatus.’ [4]

As shocking as Scahill’s report is, it must nevertheless be viewed as a limited hangout, since there is no mention of the persistent charges that a large part of the deadly bombings in Peshawar and other Pakistani cities are being carried out by Blackwater, as this news item suggests: “ISLAMABAD Oct. 29 (Xinhua) -- Chief of Taliban movement in Pakistan Hakimullah Mehsud has blamed the controversial American private firm Blackwater for the bomb blast in Peshawar which killed 108 people, local news agency NNI reported Thursday.”[5] This was blind terrorism designed for maximum slaughter, especially among women and children.

US ALSO AT WAR WITH UZBEKISTAN?

Scahill’s report also suggests that US black ops have reached into Uzbekistan, a post-Soviet country of 25 million which borders Afghanistan to the north: ‘In addition to planning drone strikes and operations against suspected Al Qaeda and Taliban forces in Pakistan for both JSOC and the CIA, the Blackwater team in Karachi also helps plan missions for JSOC inside Uzbekistan against the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, according to the military intelligence source. Blackwater does not actually carry out the operations, he said, which are executed on the ground by JSOC forces. "That piqued my curiosity and really worries me because I don't know if you noticed but I was never told we are at war with Uzbekistan," he said. "So, did I miss something, did Rumsfeld come back into power?"’ [6] Such are the ways of hope and change.

The role of US intelligence in fomenting the Baluchistan rebellion for the purpose of breaking Pakistan apart is also confirmed by Professor Chossudovsky: ‘Already in 2005, a report by the US National Intelligence Council and the CIA forecast a “Yugoslav-like fate” for Pakistan “in a decade with the country riven by civil war, bloodshed and inter-provincial rivalries, as seen recently in Baluchistan.” (Energy Compass, 2 March 2005). According to the NIC-CIA, Pakistan is slated to become a “failed state” by 2015, “as it would be affected by civil war, complete Talibanization and struggle for control of its nuclear weapons”. (Quoted by former Pakistan High Commissioner to UK, Wajid Shamsul Hasan, Times of India, 13 February 2005)…. Washington favors the creation of a “Greater Baluchistan” which would integrate the Baluch areas of Pakistan with those of Iran and possibly the Southern tip of Afghanistan, thereby leading to a process of political fracturing in both Iran and Pakistan.’[7] The Iranians, for their part, are adamant that the US is committing acts of war on their territory in Baluchistan: “TEHRAN, Oct. 29 (Xinhua) -- Iran's Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani said …that there are some concrete evidences showing U.S. involvement in recent deadly bomb explosions in the country's Sistan-Baluchistan province, the official IRNA news agency reported. …. The deadly suicide attack by Sunni rebel group Jundallah (God's soldiers) occurred on Oct. 18 in Iran's Sistan-Baluchistan province near the border with Pakistan when the local officials were preparing a ceremony in which the local tribal leaders were to meet the military commanders of Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC).[8]

US GOAL: CUT THE PAKISTAN ENERGY CORRIDOR BETWEEN IRAN, CHINA

Why would the United States be so obsessed with the breakup of Pakistan? One reason is that Pakistan is traditionally a strategic ally and economic partner of China, a country which the US and British are determined to oppose and contain on the world stage. Specifically, Pakistan could function as an energy corridor linking the oil fields of Iran and possibly even Iraq with the Chinese market by means of a pipeline that would cross the Himalayas above Kashmir. This is the so-called “Pipelinestan” issue. This would give China a guaranteed land-based oil supply not subject to Anglo-American naval superiority, while also cutting out the 12,000 mile tanker route around the southern rim of Asia. As a recent news report points out: ‘Beijing has been pressuring Tehran for China’s participation in the pipeline project and Islamabad, while willing to sign a bilateral agreement with Iran, has also welcomed China’s participation. According to an estimate, such a pipeline would result in Pakistan getting $200 million to $500 million annually in transit fees alone. China and Pakistan are already working on a proposal for laying a trans-Himalayan pipeline to carry Middle Eastern crude oil to western China. Pakistan provides China the shortest possible route to import oil from the Gulf countries…. The pipeline, which would run from the southern Pakistan port of Gwadar and follow the Karakoram highway, would be partly financed by Beijing. The Chinese are also building a refinery at Gwadar. Imports using the pipeline would allow Beijing to reduce the portion of its oil shipped through the narrow and unsafe Strait of Malacca, which at present carries up to 80% of its oil imports. Islamabad also plans to extend a railway track to China to connect it to Gwadar. The port is also considered the likely terminus of proposed multibillion-dollar gas pipelines reaching from the South Pars fields in Iran or from Qatar, and from the Daulatabad fields in Turkmenistan for export to world markets. Syed Fazl-e-Haider, “Pakistan, Iran sign gas pipeline deal,” Asia Times, 27 May 2009.[9] This is the normal, peaceful economic progress and cooperation which the Anglo-Americans are hell-bent on stopping.

Oil and natural gas pipelines from Iran across Pakistan and into China would carry energy resources into the Middle Kingdom, and would also serve as conveyor belts for Chinese economic influence into the Middle East. This would make Anglo-American dominion increasingly tenuous in a part of the world which London and Washington have traditionally sought to control as part of their overall strategy of world domination.

US domestic propaganda is already portraying Pakistan as the new home base of terrorism. The four pathetic patsies going on trial for an alleged plot to bomb a synagogue in the Riverdale neighborhood of the Bronx in New York City had been carefully sheep-dipped to associate them with the shadowy and suspicious Jaish-e-Mohammad, allegedly a Pakistani terrorist group. The same goes for the five Moslems from Northern Virginia who have just been arrested near Lahore in Pakistan.

INDIA AND IRAN

As far as the neighboring states are concerned, India under the unfortunate Manmohan Singh seems to be accepting the role of continental dagger against Pakistan and China on behalf of the US and the British. This is a recipe for a colossal tragedy. India should rather make permanent peace with Pakistan by vacating the Vale of Kashmir, where 95% of the population is Moslem and would like to join Pakistan. Without a solution to this issue, there will be no peace on the subcontinent.

Regarding Iran, George Friedman, the head of the Stratfor outlet of the US intelligence community recently told Russia Today that the great novelty of the next decade will be an alliance of the United States with Iran directed against Russia. In that scenario, Iran would cut off oil to China altogether. That is the essence of the Brzezinski strategy. It is urgent that the antiwar movement in the United States regroup and begin a new mobilization against the cynical hypocrisy of Obama’s war and escalation policy, which suprasses even the war crimes of the Bush-Cheny neocons. In this new phase of the Great Game, the stakes are incalculable.


[1] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/06/feingold-why-surge-where_n_381729.html
[2] Ibrahim Sajid Malick, “Did Obama Declare War On Pakistan?,” Pakistan for Pakistanis Blog, 2 December 2009. http://ibrahimsajidmalick.com/did-Obama-declare-war-on-pakistan/484/
[3] Scott Shane, “C.I.A. to Expand Use of Drones in Pakistan,” New York Times, December 3, 2009. See also David E. Sanger and Eric Schmitt, “Between the Lines, an Expansion in Pakistan,” New York Times, 1 December 2009.
[4] Jeremy Scahill, “The Secret US War in Pakistan,” The Nation, November 23, 2009
[5] “Taliban in Pakistan blame U.S. Blackwater for deadly blast,” Xinhua News Agency, 29 October 2009, http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-10/29/content_12358907.htm
[6] Jeremy Scahill, “The Secret US War in Pakistan,” The Nation, November 23, 2009
[7] Michel Chossudovsky, The Destabilization of Pakistan, Global Research, December 30, 2007
[8] “Iran says having evidences of U.S. involvement in suicide bomb attacks,” Xinhua, 29 October 2009.
[9] http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KE27Df03.html 

WHY THE SATANIC WEST HATES ISLAM, MUSLIMS AND ALL GENUINE MORALLY INCLINED PEOPLE?

0
0
WHY THE SATANIC WEST HATES ISLAM, MUSLIMS AND ALL GENUINE MORALLY INCLINED PEOPLE OF ALL CONFESSIONS?





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=854xZGo5pQw

THIS IS JUST SOME OF THE MANY REASONS!  




NOTHING IS SACRED ANYMORE!

EVERY SATANIC FILTH IS KOSHER EXCEPT GOD AND RELIGION!
 

ANYWAY, I AM FOR BANNING ALL MEAT AND ALL FOOD!
 ALEX JONES ON THE JEWISH FREEMASONIC NEW WORLD ORDER

APOCALYPSE 23 - 1995 ILLUMINATI CARD GAME - FREEDOM, TRUTH, MORALITY AND JUSTICE JIHAAD

0
0


APOCALYPSE 23
1995 ILLUMINATI CARD GAME  FREEDOM, TRUTH, MORALITY AND JUSTICE JIHAAD
 
 

1995 Illuminati Card Game Explained HD

Humans who refuse to FIGHT for freedom, truth, justice and a moral way of life do not deserve to live, and it is criminal and cowardly to put the lives of our children and grandchildren in jeopardy, and allow the world to be led to its total destruction, except for the Élite, of course!



Nitric Oxide Boosts Physical & Mental Performance

 
rense.com
 

1990s Illuminati Game Cards
Still Creating Controversy
From Wikipedia
11-21-11
 
Overview Of The Game
 
Illuminati is a standalone card game made by Steve Jackson Games (SJG), inspired by The Illuminatus! Trilogy by Robert Anton Wilson and Robert Shea. The game has ominous secret societies competing with each other to control the world through sinister means, including legal, illegal, and even mystical. It was designed as a "tongue-in-cheek rather than serious"[1] take on conspiracy theories. It contains groups named similarly to real world organizations, such as the Society for Creative Anachronism.[2] It can be played by two to eight players. Depending on the number of players, a game can take between one and six hours.
 
Genesis Of The Game
 
In September 1981, Steve Jackson and his regular freelance cover artist Dave Martin discussed their shared admiration of the Illuminatus! Trilogy, and the latter suggested a game. Steve Jackson decided against adapting the novel because of the expense of game rights, and the difficulty of adapting a novel with such convoluted plots. He decided "a game about the secret-conspiracy idea behind Illuminatus!" was doable.
 
After doing research on the Illuminati and conspiracy theories, and "extensive and enthusiastic playtesting" it went on the market in July 1982 in the Pocket Box format (a plastic box the size of a mass-market paperback) which was at the time the usual for SJG. Over the next few years, three expansions for the Pocket Box Illuminati game were published-the first two were substantially incorporated into the deluxe edition, while the third was an earlier version of what would become Illuminati: Brainwash.
 
Robert Shea provided a four-paragraph introduction to the rulebook for the Illuminati Expansion Set 1 (1983), in which he wrote, "Maybe the Illuminati are behind this game. They must be-they are, by definition, behind everything." Despite this initial involvement, Wilson later criticized some of these products for exploiting the Illuminatus! name without paying royalties (taking advantage of what he viewed as a legal loophole).[3] Later commentators have attributed both the game and the Illuminatus! Trilogy as using real conspiracies as "targets of ridicule."[4]
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illuminati_%28game%29
 
 
 
Nationalization of all businesses: 
 
 
 
How did they know?
 
 
 
HAARP and satellite mind control?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
These cards were in fact made in 1990-1991.
 
Read the following but then WATCH THIS VIDEO: http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2010/05/illuminati-card-game-bp-oil-spill.html
For those in Oregon read this: What other types of disasters might the Illuminati have planned for us? In the card game
we find the following: Tidal wave, Oregon disaster (type not stated), earthquake, hurricane, volcano, combined disasters,
and meteor strike
, just to name a few. Are you ready?
 
 
 
Oil spill card of Illuminati Card Game 
 
 Likewise another card, issued well before 9-11, showed the twin towers being taken down is one of the most shocking of all, especially in light of the fact that this game first hit the specialty stores in 1995! How in the world did Steve Jackson know that the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center were going to be attacked?
In fact, this card accurately depicted the World Trade Center attack in great detail. This card accurately depicts several facts of 9/11 - on cards created all the way back in 1995! The picture accurately depicts:
* That one tower was going to be struck first; this picture accurately depicts the moments between the first tower strike and the second.
* The card accurately depicts that the place of impact is some distance from the top of the twin towers. The plane hit in this approximate area of the first tower. How in the world could Steve Jackson know this fact?
* The card accurately depicts the Illuminati leadership by showing on the building to the extreme left of the card the Illuminist pyramid with an all-seeing eye in the middle.
* The caption at the top properly identifies the perpetrators of the attack as "terrorists"
 
 
 However, what does the caption to this card mean? It says, "Terrorist Nuke". Now, what could this possibly mean? The Twin Towers were not destroyed by a terrorist nuclear device, or were they? In Bali Blast, the scientific data suggested that the hotel was taken down by a micro-nuclear device of about 0.10 kilotons . One can only ask: was a micro-nuclear device used at the base of the Twin Towers as well? That kind of small, but nuclear, explosion would account for the sudden manner the reinforced concrete and steel shell simply crumbled into dust as it fell. That kind of nuclear explosion would also explain the tremendous heat that stayed at "Ground Zero" for several months after 9/11. As we head into the planned "terrorist attacks" and attendant panics, we have to remain cognizant that a micro-nuke device might be the real culprit in some of these attacks
Pentagon ­ Unless one had advanced knowledge of the Illuminati Plan, there is no way on earth that they would have been able to create pictures in 1995 that accurately depict the unfolding events of 9/11!The Pentagon is shown on fire; we know that a plane allegedly flew into a section of the Pentagon and nearly burned that section completely. However, the rest of the Pentagon was undamaged to the point where its functions continued unimpeded.

Isn't this the situation depicted here? This card shows a fire burning mightily in the center courtyard of the Pentagon, but the rest of the building looks undamaged enough so that normal activities could continue unimpeded!
Thus, these two cards literally depict both of the strikes of 9/11: against the Twin Towers first and then against the Pentagon. This kind of accuracy 6 years before the attacks is possible only if one knows the Illuminati Plan very thoroughly.. Source

What other types of disasters might the Illuminati have planned for us? In the card game we find the following: Tidal wave, Oregondisaster (type not stated), earthquake, hurricane, volcano, combined disasters, and meteor strike, just to name a few. Are you ready?

How stupid are the American people? How apostate? Now comes destruction, death and hell. Don't believe it? In total denial? You better stay in denial, for as the saying goes, ignorance is bliss, that is until you pay the piper. These cards are not made up, I have all of them, they were in fact made in 1990-1991 - PANIC -GLP
 
 
 
 Notice the card in the third row with the plane pulling around a cloudi.e., chemtrails creating clouds.
 
The fellow who created these cards is obviously in on the Globalists plan for us.
 
I enlarged every card, over 350 of them and read them.  Very telling of just how sick their plans are for us.
 
Card 102 on world energy crisis
 
 
 
 
Nobody has any idea what's in those secret recipes and when they find out, they will forget????
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

NO HOLOCAUST IN AUSCHWITZ LABOUR CAMP BUT HOLOCAUSTS IN EISENHOWER'S DEATH CAMPS!

0
0


German woman lays charges against Central Council of Jews







MUST READ: German woman lays charges against Central Council of Jews

Justice for Germans
Deutsch



http://justice4germans.com/

J4G YouTube Channel



https://www.youtube.com/user/justice4germans
Exploring the little known, but true history and seeking truth, justice and honour for the German people
http://justice4germans.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/path2.jpg?w=474
http://justice4germans.com/the-peacemakers-those-who-opposed-the-war-against-germany/ Peacemakers
Third Reich http://justice4germans.com/third-reich/
War Crimes http://justice4germans.com/warcrimes/
WWII & Danzig http://justice4germans.com/danzig-and-wwii/
WWII Bombing http://justice4germans.com/wwii-bombing/
http://justice4germans.com/page/2/← Older posts
http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/17/86-year-old-german-woman-lays-charges-against-the-central-council-of-the-jews-in-germany/
86 Year Old German Woman lays charges against the Central Council of the Jews in Germany
Posted on
http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/17/86-year-old-german-woman-lays-charges-against-the-central-council-of-the-jews-in-germany/
12/17/2014 by
http://justice4germans.com/author/justice4german/
http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/17/86-year-old-german-woman-lays-charges-against-the-central-council-of-the-jews-in-germany/ursula-haverbeck/
Ursula HaverbeckHere is a story you won’t hear in the “mainstream media” nor the alternative, unless it is first put through the wash and spin cycle.
Thus,  I will do my best to simply translate and present this important and very newsworthy story to the world for consideration as provided by the original author, whom I shall introduce, as well as provide some context for her perspective, as well as my own.
Frau Ursula Haverbeck, born in 1928,  is an 86 year old survivor of the genocidal Allied terror bombing
http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/wwii-bombing/
, the Russian onslaught of rape and pillage
http://justice4germans.com/2012/11/13/a-memorial-for-the-millions-of-german-women-and-girls-who-were-raped-and-pillaged-by-the-wwii-allied-liberators/
on Germany’s Eastern frontier, the anti-German pogroms and expulsions
http://justice4germans.com/2013/06/20/they-called-it-liberation-i-call-it-hate-war-crimes-and-genocide-against-germans-you-be-the-judge/
and the post-war Morgenthau Plan of mass starvation
http://justice4germans.com/2013/07/03/the-kaufman-and-morgenthau-plans-to-exterminate-the-germans-prior-to-during-and-after-ww-ii/ 
perpetrated against Germany, the enslavement and mass murder of surrendered German soldiers
http://justice4germans.com/2013/08/21/documentary-eisenhowers-rhine-meadows-death-camps-a-deliberate-policy-of-extermination/
as well as, of the post-war cultural genocide
http://justice4germans.com/2013/09/11/a-case-study-in-intellectual-dishonesty-false-history-and-anti-germanism-by-hans-krampe/
of the German nation by the criminal victors.

Many today still live in “denial” of these obvious and provable crimes, but no law prevents anyone from voicing their denial, so no one has ever been jailed for denying these facts. Nor is any notion of “collective guilt and punishment” forced upon the citizens of the nations which perpetrated these monstrous “war crimes” and “crimes against humanity”.

The peoples of the Allied nations have not been divided, and had their land, culture and heritage stolen. Nor have they been forced to pay reparations to the Germans for this “Unholicaust”.  No one has ever been jailed for spreading “false news” and “inciting hatred” toward the German people, though it is committed daily in the mass media;  in books, films, TV shows, newspaper articles, schools, and in everyday average conversation amongst people everywhere.

Frau Haverbeck is a very learned, lucid and articulate lady, who is in good physical and mental health. She holds several university degrees, including in the field of Education. She, along with her late husband (a professor and former Eastern Front soldier) were both, in past years, very involved with environmental concerns in Germany, and were activists for the preservation of the German language and culture.
On November 20th, 2014, Frau Haverbeck made history by laying criminal charges against the Central Council of the Jews in Germany, under S. 344 of  German Penal Code with “False Prosecutions” perpetrated against innocent Germans concerning their “denial of the holocaust” (TM).  The crime of False Prosecution is punishable with up to 10 years imprisonment.

In this recent video entitled “The Biggest Problem of Our Time”, she cited the ever diminishing publicly acknowledged numbers of Jews who died at Auschwitz, as already acknowledged by official sources, and which can also be read by all on the plaque outside the former Auschwitz camp

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v21/v21n3p24_weber.html

She referred to an article to this effect in the nationally published magazine “Der Spiegel” in 2002.  Frau Haverbeck also stated that original NS German documents concerning the exact orders pertaining to the duties at Auschwitz which had been seized by the Soviet Union after the war, were now in possession of the mainstream “Institut für Zeitgeschicht” (Institute for History), and also available to the public for a fee of €124.00 since 2000.

Frau Haverbeck says that “these documents indicate very clearly, in full detail,  that the Auschwitz camp was not an ‘Extermination Camp’, but rather a ‘labour camp’ for the defence industry, and moreover, that those in charge of its operation were under orders to maintain the health of the prisoners to the best of their ability for the purposes of production, which was essential for the continuing war effort”.  She adds, “that is what those who worked there and have been accused of war crimes have always maintained!”

“Surely by now” Frau Haverbeck says “an official revision which encompasses these facts should have taken place and that all  judgments made against so-called ‘deniers’ should have been overturned, as the evidence is available which supports their position, but nothing of the sort has happened.
Many are still sitting in jail to this day.  This puts the onus back on the accusers who continue to claim that 6 Million Jews were exterminated, to show us where the physical evidence is that supports their claim. Where are they?”

Frau Haverbeck stated that “I and others have petitioned every possible government department and branch of justice and have provided them with these documents, and yet nothing has happened. There has been no reply!

The reason for that must be that they have no response as they have no evidence, as there was no holocaust”.

“If this was an indeed such an ‘open and shut case’ that is irrefutable, as the courts have ruled over and over again, and which they never tire of telling us, their case cannot rest upon any so-called ‘secret order’ . And for them to now have to acknowledge a drastically reduced number of victims is for them also not possible, given the alleged  singularity of this event, as the one and the only, and the biggest and most heinous crime ever committed.

Then let us consider and compare this with the ‘Rheinwiesenlager’ (Eisenhower’s Death Camps), Dresden, Hiroshima, and horrors experienced by the many millions of German expellees and refugees from the East!”

Frau Haverbeck then goes on to state that “in statements made at Nuremberg, no one testified to the presence of any gas chambers, and that confessions, particularly those of Rudolf Höss, are now well known to have been extracted through unimaginable, excruciating torture, to which anyone would have confessed to the mass murder of millions. No testimony, received by such means,  as legal experts know, can be given consideration.

Why is it that there should even be such a law as S. 130 that should deny us the ability to question this? And how is it that the entire body of defence testimony and uncountable volume of physical evidence which they tried to provide was completely ignored or destroyed?

Such could only have proved to have been incriminating if something sinister had actually taken place. Obviously, they (the prosecutors) could prove nothing, and so these witnesses and their evidence had to disappear.”

She goes on to question how this is possible in Germany for the authorities to ignore, and asks whose interests these “authorities” and “academics” etc truly serve? (This roughly the first 10 minutes of the 19 minute long video.

I’ll leave it there in the interest of time and length.)

In a statement posted on her website http://ursula-haverbeck.info/
, Frau Haverbeck writes:

“After weeks of reading on the internet that ‘there was no Holocaust’ all processes in which critical-thinking citizens convicted of Holocaust denial under section 130, paragraph 3 of the Criminal Code must now be re-opened .

These citizens have committed no other crime other than that they came to the same conclusions earlier, that there may not have been any such “holocaust”, because of their own due diligence and scientific knowledge.

All interested parties should immediately consult the competent courts in order to make them now aware of this new evidence. Then, contact their respective lawyers to clarify as to how to proceed.
It was outrageous what took place after the reduction of the number of victims of Auschwitz, which was officially announced to the public, with no explanation, nor apology for giving false information.  Whereas, the ‘Spiegel’  Editor, who wrote the same thing in an essay based upon the new archival discoveries, etc., has gone unpunished.

Even more serious and incompatible with the rule of law was the simultaneous arrest and jailing of the chemist Germar Rudolf.  He had, with his chemistry expertise and his scientific investigations into Zyklon B as a potential gassing agent, come to the conclusion that the holocaust, as hitherto described, could not have happened at Auschwitz.

Now this is unacceptable: on the one side, the documents of the Commandant of Auschwitz show that this was a labor camp for the defence industry and not an extermination camp, yet the Ludwigsburg Central Office for prosecution of ‘National Socialist crimes’ has indicted about thirty men, now over ninety years old, on the charge that they had been involved an the extermination camp at Auschwitz, and in the murder of hundreds of thousands of people.

If the German citizen is still the supreme sovereign under the Basic Law in this Federal Republic of Germany, then each of us has a responsibility for the truth, and a right to expect that justice be done.  This is the basic responsibility of every citizen. It is, therefore, also the duty of each to also work towards the restoration of law and justice.”

Approx. 2,000 Germans are charged each year in Germany under S.130 of Penal Code for “Holocaust Denial” which is punishable with up to 5 years imprisonment and fines, and also has social penalties, as those convicted find themselves unable to work and shut out of organizations, etc.

In the media they are demonized and vilified as “Neo-Nazis” and “right-wing extremists”. The term “Nazi” is, as I have previously reported

http://justice4germans.com/2013/04/16/exposing-the-nazi-epithet-who-started-it-why-how-and-who-benefits/ 

, a pejorative term created by the enemies

http://justice4germans.com/2013/09/27/exposing-the-nazi-epithet-part-2-anti-hitlerism-the-rise-of-pure-bs-and-hatred/ 

of National Socialism long before Hitler ever came to power, and it is still wielded as a weapon to this day, in Germany and elsewhere, to stifle dissent and discussion, and to incite hatred.

Frau Haverbeck, herself, has been labelled as such and has previously been charged and convicted as a “Holocaust denier” and also with “Volksverhetzung” (inciting hatred) for her efforts to speak out on behalf of the German people who to do this day are burdened with the alleged guilt of starting the war, of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the systematic mass murder of the European Jews.
Questioning any of this in “liberated” Germany is punishable with imprisonment. Presenting evidence to the contrary is not allowed. It is also forbidden in Canada and many European nations.

Here is just a partial list
of others http://radioislam.org/victims/  (Germans and non-Germans) who have been tried, convicted, stalked, harassed and violently attacked for sharing their views and for presenting factual evidence contrary to the official and legally enforced narrative.

Quotes from Frau Havenbeck:
„Wir leben gar nicht in einer echten Demokratie, was man schon daran erkennen kann, daß alle Angst haben. Die Herrscher haben vor dem Volk Angst, deshalb gibt es Maulkorbgesetze, und das Volk hat vor den Regierenden Angst, deshalb wagt es nicht zu sagen, was es denkt.“ ~ Ursula Haverbeck vor dem
Landgericht Dortmund, 11. Juni 2007


Translation: “We do not live a real democracy, which one can easily see when everyone lives in fear.  The Controllers are afraid of the people, and for this reason, they have made “muzzle laws”, and so the people live in fear of those who rule over them.  Therefore. the people do not dare to speak their minds.”  ~ Ursula Havenbeck, before the State Court in Dortmund, 11th June, 2007

„Vaterland und Muttersprache bilden die Grundlage jeder völkischen
Entwicklung. […] Ein Sklave, der seine Ketten nicht spürt, sehnt sich
niemals nach der Freiheit.“ ~ Ursula Haverbeck als Referentin im
NPD-Bürgerzentrum, März 2010


Translation: “Fatherland and Mother Tongue are the basis for any folkish (German cultural) development. […] A slave who does not realize he is in chains will never seek to free himself” ~ Ursula Havenbeck, as guest speaker of the NPD-Citizen Centre, March 2010.

http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/17/86-year-old-german-woman-lays-charges-against-the-central-council-of-the-jews-in-germany/ursula-haverbeck-warrior-for-trtuh-and-justice/
Ursula Haverbeck – Warrior for Truth and Justice
Fighter for the Truth
A plaque created for her by friends and supporters in Germany
http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/17/86-year-old-german-woman-lays-charges-against-the-central-council-of-the-jews-in-germany/ursula-haverbeck-award/
Ursula Haverbeck AwardTranslation: “Ursula Haverbeck is today 85, and works tirelessly for her homeland. In recognition of her loyalty and conscientious fulfillment of her duty for the fatherland, is this certificate presented in lasting recognition. In Lügde, on the 9th of November, 2013.
ursula-haverbeck.infohttp://ursula-haverbeck.info/
Posted in Activism, http://justice4germans.com/category/activism-2/
genocide, http://justice4germans.com/category/genocide/
Germany,http://justice4germans.com/category/germany/
holocaust,http://justice4germans.com/category/holocaust/
News,http://justice4germans.com/category/news/
Video, http://justice4germans.com/category/video-2/
War Crimes,http://justice4germans.com/category/war-crimes-2/
World War II  Taggedhttp://justice4germans.com/category/world-war-ii/
allies,http://justice4germans.com/tag/allies/
atrocities,http://justice4germans.com/tag/atrocities/
Auschwitz,http://justice4germans.com/tag/auschwitz/
genocide,http://justice4germans.com/tag/genocide/
Germans,http://justice4germans.com/tag/germans/
Germany,http://justice4germans.com/tag/germany/
hate crimes,http://justice4germans.com/tag/hate-crimes/
holocaust,http://justice4germans.com/tag/holocaust/
Jews,http://justice4germans.com/tag/jews/
justice,http://justice4germans.com/tag/justice/
mass murder,http://justice4germans.com/tag/mass-murder/
prosecutions,http://justice4germans.com/tag/prosecutions/
revisionism,http://justice4germans.com/tag/revisionism/
truth,http://justice4germans.com/tag/truth/
Ursula Haverbeck,http://justice4germans.com/tag/ursula-haverbeck/
World War II,http://justice4germans.com/tag/world-war-ii/
http://justice4germans.com/tag/wwii/
15 Commentshttp://justice4germans.com/2014/12/17/86-year-old-german-woman-lays-charges-against-the-central-council-of-the-jews-in-germany/#comments
http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/16/1938-u-s-census-figures-reveal-high-unemployment-under-roosevelt-parallels-and-implications-for-today/
1938 U.S.
Census Figures Reveal High Unemployment Under Roosevelt – Parallels and Implications for Today
Posted on
http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/16/1938-u-s-census-figures-reveal-high-unemployment-under-roosevelt-parallels-and-implications-for-today/
12/16/2014 justice4germans  http://justice4germans.com/autho/justice4germans/
http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/16/1938-u-s-census-figures-reveal-high-unemployment-under-roosevelt-parallels-and-implications-for-today/us-has-huge-unemployment-1938/
US Has Huge Unemployment 1938A 1938 news report on U.S.
unemployment figures states: “In a partial report to President Roosevelt the census director indicated that the number of unemployed throughout the nation in the middle of November was 7,800,000 to 10,800,000 persons.”
He estimated that an additional million had been laid off since then, and that 7,800,000 had afterwards voluntarily registered, after which in a canvass of houses officials registered 1,950,000 additional persons, indicating a 72 per cent, voluntary response, upon which he based the figure of 10,800, 000. He pointed out that nearly two million women were included among those in need of employment, some of whom were doubtful.”

Source: http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/68397616
Why did the Bankster Gangsters [self-described “International Jewry”] not spend their £500,000,000

(see my previous post
http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2014/12/15/1938-news-report-confirms-international-jewish-banker-financial-war-aims/ ) on helping to put Brits, Americans and others within their economic ‘sphere of influence’ back to work by helping farmers, building roads and infrastructure, and helping mothers, rather than on the waging an economic terror war and media smear campaign against Germany, Italy and Japan? And upon bribery and threats to get western leaders to do their bidding?
Having so many unemployed and hungry Americans must have  provided a nice incentive for them to want to build bombs, bombers, fighter planes, war ships and tanks to kick start their own economy, and then to later to go off and fight the evil “Nazis” “Fascists” and “Japs” as depicted by the Wall Street Gang and their Comrades in London, Moscow and Hollywood. “The Greatest Generation”? Really?
Britain was also suffering from high unemployment with many idle hands and hungry mouths, and the cost of supporting them, while in the Soviet Union, Stalin killed off many, many millions and put still more millions in gulag slave labour camps. He also got financial support from Roosevelt to build his war machine. Germany, however, had long since put nearly 7 million unemployed people back into productive work again to rescue their economy and autonomy, and within a few years was  importing labour to fill shortages.  So, who had a motive for provoking a New World War? Who had an
interest in manipulating their people to fight? Hitler, or Roosevelt and Churchill?

http://justice4germans.com/third-reich/fdr4/ fdr4While many idle hands were indeed enlisted to do the “work of the devil”, it was more than just a “make work project” for the economic gain of individual nations.
It was part of a life and death struggle by and for Judeo-International High Finance and their Judeo-Freemasonic-Communistic “New World Order” agenda, as expressed first through the Dictates of Versailles, then League of Nations, and later, through the formation of the United Nations, to fight Germany and the Axis powers.  Yes, the UN is about war, not peace.
Except in so far as the Bankster Gangsters had peace to do their dirty work. The Democratic leaders were their puppets and the Allied soldiers (often the unemployed) were their tools, and that tradition continues today. But it is their control of the money supply, the media, education, intelligence agencies, and of corrupt politicians and political parties, in the very ‘dumbed down’ and easily manipulated, heavily indebted (hence, compliant), democratic states which remains, by far, their greatest weapon of mass destruction
today.
If that were not the case, we might actually have “Peace on Earth”  today, instead of serial wars that are like ‘B Movies’ with the same predictable plot, and another generation of gullible and unemployed sheeple, running off to fight for their own enslavement, with the same predictable outcome of being kicked to the curb afterwards (if they return), while the rest are stuck with the bill, in the form of still more debt and interest slavery.
Not to mention, for caring for the physically and spiritually wounded, and the psychologically destroyed. These are the very things, of course, which Hitler and National Socialism opposed.
Make no mistake. It was not just the Germans who were defeated in World War II.
All nations who went along with the destruction of Germany lost, in many cases never having experienced bullets and bombs on their own soil. They lost in terms of their own humanity, culture, heritage,  sovereignty and solvency. But they lost in ‘slow motion’ and are perhaps only now just realizing it, and seeing the effects of it around them. The proverbial ‘frog in the slow boiling pot’, so to speak. ‘This isn’t the Britain we fought for,’ say the ‘unknown warriors’ of WWII
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1229643/This isnt-Britain-fought-say-unknown-warriors-WWII.html
This insane path can only lead to an inevitable global economic and cultural collapse, mass unemployment, chaos, starvation, disease and World War III, for the fulfillment of Bankster’s satanic NWO agenda. And, in my opinion, only World War II Truth can possibly stop this juggernaut.
What I am doing here with this blog is not a hobby. It is activism, and it is not without personal risk and sacrifice. I will not let the blood, the suffering and ‘holocaust’ of my people, the Germans, be forgotten, nor be in vain.
The blood of countless millions of people, of all nations, races, cultures, creeds and faiths, and the complete and permanent enslavement of the remnant will not be upon my head.
We cannot wait for our corrupt leaders, academia and the media to finally tell the truth of their own accord. Nor for that matter, those in the alternative media which maintain the same narrative as the mainstream regarding Hitler, National Socialism and World War II.  No hero is going to come along and do it all for us either, nor save us after the fact.
We must prepare for what’s coming personally and for our families in various ways including stocking up on storable food and household necessities, as well as an alternative form of currency, such as Karatbars
http://justice4germans.com/2014/11/18/german-ingenuity-provides-a-means-to-protect-earnings-against-inflation-and-increase-your-wealth/ , as I have suggested. Not to mention, spiritually! Your choice.
But if we have integrity, and we care for our fellow man, our nations and this world, we must also be accountable for the sharing of information by ‘being the media’.
We must take responsibility for the “final solution” to the Bankster Gangsters: An informed public which no longer stands for lies, wars and injustice, which holds its leaders and the media accountable, refuses to go along to get a long, refuses eternal debt slavery, and demands a form of government that truly serves the interests of its people, and thereby, preserves our peoples, rather than enslaves and destroys them.
That is not a call to violence, but a call to conscience, honour, integrity, dignity, and to responsible action. Nor is it a call to hatred, except insofar, as we should hate lies, distortions, wars, injustice, the
enslavement and the destruction of our nations, peoples, cultures and the world which we ALL live in, and no longer tolerate it, or wilfully be a party to it. Indeed, that should be a labour of LOVE and RESPECT for our fellow man, and for our Creator, God Almighty. It requires sacrifice.
That is what National Socialism was all about, and yes, it was Christian. Deal with it! Let us not be as Cain, shrug our shoulders, and ask our Father “AmI my brother’s keeper?” Gen 4:9
Otherwise, we must instead prepare ourselves for the satanic Bankster Gangster’s (Babylon) “final solution” for all humanity. What they twice did to Germany is now reserved for the rest of mankind. Wait for it!
John 8:44  (KJV)
44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
Revelation 2:9 (KJV)
“I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the Synagogue of Satan.”
Revelation 3:9  (KJV)
9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
Revelation 6:8 King James Version (KJV)
And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.
Posted in England,  http://justice4germans.com/category/england/
<http://justice4germans.com/tag/bankster-gangsters/> Bankster Gangsters,
http://justice4germans.com/tag/england/> England,
http://justice4germans.com/tag/final-solution/> final solution,
http://justice4germans.com/tag/history/> history,
http://justice4germans.com/tag/hitler/> Hitler,
http://justice4germans.com/tag/international-jewry/> International Jewry,
http://justice4germans.com/tag/new-world-order/> New World Order,
http://justice4germans.com/tag/nwo/> NWO,
http://justice4germans.com/tag/roosevelt/> Roosevelt,
http://justice4germans.com/tag/unemployment/> unemployment,
http://justice4germans.com/tag/usa/> USA,
http://justice4germans.com/tag/world-war-ii/> World War II,
http://justice4germans.com/tag/world-war-iii/> World War III,
http://justice4germans.com/tag/wwii/> WWII |
http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/16/1938-u-s-census-figures-reveal-high-unemployment-under-roosevelt-parallels-and-implications-for-today/#respond
Leave a comment
http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/15/1938-news-report-confirms-international-jewish-banker-financial-war-aims/ 1938 News Report Confirms
International Jewish Banker Financial War Aims
Posted on
http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/15/1938-news-report-confirms-international-jewish-banker-financial-war-aims/12/15/2014
justice4germanshttp://justice4germans.com/author/justice4germans/ 
Financial War Planned http://justice4germans.com/?attachment_id=5371
Against Anti-Semitic States 1938 – The Worker, Brisbane, Qld, Tuesday 4 January 1938 “INTERNATIONAL JEWRY– Financial War Planned Against Anti-Semitic States £500,000,000 Fund to be Raised
‘Jewry, faced with persecution in Poland, Rumania, Germany, Austria, and elsewhere, intends to hit back,’ says the ‘Sunday Chronicle,’ according to a cable dated London, January 2.
‘The battle will be fought on the world’s stock exchanges. Most of the
anti-Semitic States are burdened with debts, and they may find their very existence threatened.
‘The leaders of international Jewry will meet in a village near Geneva this week to plan a fund of £500,000, 000 with which to fight the persecutors of Jewish financiers in all parts of the world.
‘No difficulty is expected in raising such a fund, which, combined with a trade boycott, will enable the launching a counter-offensive, in which the Jewish persecutors may be defeated.‘ “
Source: The Worker (Brisbane, Qld)
Tuesday 4 January 1938
http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article71357095
Now we know who “International Jewry” (aka Judea) really is by their own admission. We can also see that their “financial war” had nothing to do with alleged discrimination or persecution of average Jews in Germany or other nations.
It was “persecution of Jewish financiers” that they were concerned
with. This is the same gang that declared war on Germany in 1933 when the National Socialists first came to power.
Why? Because NSDAP opposed predatory Jewish International Free Market Capitalism as a very destructive force, and also opposed Jewish backed International Marxist Bolshevik Communism, which are to sides of the same coin.
http://justice4germans.com/third-reich/luge/ lugeNSDAP defeated the Communists in Germany, kicked out the Bankster Gangsters, created a new carefully controlled currency tied directly to labour, and placed tight controls on prices and wages, as well as on the stock markets to keep prices from being manipulated by international market speculators.
As such, Germany’s currency was not part of their worldwide usury system, and they could not speculate against Germany’s Reichsmark on the financial markets.
National Socialist Germany, in particular, was managing just fine without these International Bankster Gangsters and their monopoly game, which controlled the Central Banks of the western nations, and the issuance of fiat currencies, loaned out at interest (usury), by which they have always driven nations into debt and servitude.  Yet they say, “Anti-Semitic States are burdened with debts”. Very interesting! With respect to the new Germany,
that was a BIG LIE!  It seems, however, that by their own definition, an “Anti-Semitic State” is one which does not play ball with them, and it has nothing to do with concern for the lesser Jews as generally thought.
It was the western nations which were still saddled with WWI debt and were not paying it (in fact, they are still paying for that today in 2014).
Unlike the Soviet Union, following the Russian Revolution, NS Germany never repudiated her WWI debt and was making good on it.  What Germany did not have was gold reserves. Those were stolen by the WWI Allies.  More on that later.
But it begs the question, why could the Allies not pay off their own
war debts?  Who were they in debt to? Of course, the same self-described “Jewish” International Financiers, who had the power to create currency and lend it to nations at interest, and control over their debts, and to exert great influence on the stock markets.  Obviously, those nations leaders were mere puppets and their foreign policies were catered to the bankers needs or wishes, and the same holds true today.  Not so with NS Germany!
But notice that they include “Poland” and “Rumania” here, as well as
Austria”. Why?  Rumania was not allied with Germany at this time. She was neutral.  Poland was not “allied” with Germany either, BUT they did have a “friendship pact” that was signed by Hitler and the late Marshall Pilzudski.
See: Excerpts of Hitler’s Speeches on German-Polish Peace,
http://justice4germans.com/2013/06/13/excerpts-of-hitlers-speeches-on-german-polish-peace-1935-1939/
Moreover, Poland was riddled with inner ethnic strife and labour problems resulting from poor low wages and working conditions, not to mention unresolved border issues. Her products and raw materials such as coal were subject to the international market speculation.  How better to stir up the Poles (who were neither National Socialist nor Fascist, and therefore, under the financial influence of the Bankster Gangsters) than to threaten them with boycotts and financial ruin, and to drive down prices? Or perhaps, on the other hand, to dangle carrots of incentives in front of them, if they
sided with England, and again, turned hostile towards Germany and the ethnic German minority in their country?
Rumania too was a basket case with sizable ethnic minorities, ethnic strife and border disputes with her neighbours, as well as, much coveted natural resources, especially oil. No doubt King Carol II was also ripe for financial blackmail to keep Romania neutral  ie. not side with Germany or trade with her.
Austria? Since end of World War II, the Austrian people had desired to re-join the German Reich, and even more so as Germany began to prosper under Hitler and National Socialism, while they themselves languished in debt and poverty.
But the WWI Allies forbade the merger. Austrian Leader Engelbert Dollfuss also vehemently opposed it, especially after Hitler came to power in 1933. Austria too was a political and economic basket case. Dollfuss
eventually dissolved parliament and became dictator.
He was conservative, anti-Communist, and tried to model himself and his government on Mussolini’s Fascism, but he was assassinated in 1934. His successor followed largely in the same model.
That would not have pleased the Bankster Gangsters. Unlike
in Italy and Germany, the Rothschilds were still doing business in Austria, and would naturally have been more opposed to a merger with the German Reich and the expanded influence of National Socialism.  Indeed, after Austria voted to join the Reich,  the Rothschild bank in Vienna was closed with all of its assets seized by the Reich government, as I have previously noted in
an older post. See:
http://justice4germans.com/2012/10/13/hitler-was-a-jew-a-rothschild-really/
It should be easy to see that virtually all of Germany’s neighbours would have been subject to the same degree of heavy handed financial influence, and as such, whatever neutrality they declared or peace agreements they came to with Germany, or foreign policy they espoused, they could easily be brought to heel and to cooperate in some way, by those who controlled their money and their debt, and the markets, and who also had such great sums of
money at their disposal with which to bribe the leaders.
Far fetched? “Conspiracy theory”? This came to light just a few years ago: MI6 spent $200m bribing Spaniards in second world war
Newly released documents reveal secret services paid out fortune in bid to stop Franco joining war on Hitler’s side
MI6 spent the present-day equivalent of more than $200m bribing senior Spanish military officers, ship owners and other agents to keep Spain out of the second world war, files released today disclose.
More and more money was delivered, mainly via a Swiss bank account in New York, as Sir Samuel Hoare, Britain’s ambassador in Madrid, warned London that unless it was paid, there was a real and immediate danger of Spain abandoning its neutrality and of Franco joining forces with Nazi Germany.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/may/23/mi6-spain-200m-bribes-ww2
Hitler was extremely disappointed by the lack of Spanish support, or meagre support. Franco owed Germany. It could have made a huge difference to the defence of Europe. Now we know why it was not forthcoming..
So did  “International Jewry” come up with the £500,000,000 which they “would have no difficulty raising”, and what did they do with it?  Now I think we have a pretty good idea.  My guess is that a lot more went into international “Anti-Nazi” hate propaganda, funding various subversive groups in Germany,  inciting Anti-German hatred in Poland, as well as bribing or blackmailing other nations, and funding the Soviets.
Why didn’t these “International Jews” put their £500,000,000 into helping those oft cited (pre-war) “6,000,000” poor persecuted eastern Jews in Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Romania, and elsewhere
http://murderbymedia.wordpress.com/2013/01/21/nine-1916-19-6000000-jews-in-peril-stories/  to immigrate to Palestine, hmmm?
I will let you the reader think about it and make up your own mind on that.  Why did they not put into creating much needed employment in the UK and USA? The answer should be clear, that they do not give a rat’s ass about anyone but themselves and their financial interests, and that is what was at risk, why they wanted war and did everything in their power to destroy and enslave Germany, permanently. Moreover, it was also to set a precedent for future wars.
That is what is really going on when they call a nation “Anti-Semitic” or when they say, in regard to some nation’s leader who is bucking the system, “he’s another Hitler!”
I was going to end there, but please bear with me. Let’s play “follow the money”.  Interestingly,  in July of 1939, the Bank of England (The
Rothschilds) tucked away gold in the same amount of £500,000,000  in preparation for war with Germany.
http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/15/1938-news-report-confirms-international-jewish-banker-financial-war-aims/british-secret-gold-vault-1939/
British secret gold vault 1939“SECRET VAULT FOR £500,000,000
Governors of the Bank of England have drawn up plans for transporting £500,000,000 of the nation’s gold reserve to a secret vault in the country in the event of war.
This vault is hundreds of miles from London, and comprises a bomb-proof safe deposit.
The convoy , will be escorted by an armed guard of both police and
soldiers. The gold, represents Britain’s staying power — the basis on which war loans might be raised, and the purchasing power which will ensure supplies of food and raw materials, from overseas.“
http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article42189468
As I alluded to earlier, Germany had NO gold, and was NOT part of the International Bankster Gangsters monopoly game. Hitler did NOT and could not print money at will as the whole financial and economic system would have quickly unravelled. Germany did NOT have access to international loans from London and New York for the purposes of war.
Indeed, “International Jewry” was telling us that Hitler opposed THEM.  So, obviously he was NOT a tool of
the Rothschilds, nor “a Jew”, as so many disinfo agents and their moron followers have claimed, and which I have previously debunked.
The facts are, Germany did NOT want war, nor could afford another long war, much less wars of conquest. Germany had a military that was numerically far inferior to France, Poland, Russia and the UK. Germany was being boycotted by the USA and many other countries, had no colonies from which to extract resources, only limited trade opportunities which were conducted through barter, and few sources for raw materials needed for industry and military purposes.
The International Bankster Gangster (self-described “International
Jewry”also deplored that barter system, as it cut them out! So, have we figured out who this war was for yet, who financed it and who benefited? And if anyone thinks that it was just Germany, Italy and Japan who lost, they could not be more wrong.
In closing, it is  interesting to note that, after the war, in 1949, there
was a massive default on debt owed to Britain to the tune of  (drum roll please…..)
http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/15/1938-news-report-confirms-international-jewish-banker-financial-war-aims/500000000-default/
£500,000,000 default£500,000,000 DEFAULT
LONDON. Feb. ll.-Foreign borrowers who have defaulted in their payments of capital and interest, now owe British investors nearly £500 million.
The Council of Foreign Bond holders says this in its annual report. The council protects the interests of holders of foreign government State or municipal obligations issued In Britain.  http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article63445925
Congratulations Brits.
Posted in
Economics,  http://justice4germans.com/category/economics/
England,http://justice4germans.com/category/england/
financing,http://justice4germans.com/category/financing/
Germany,http://justice4germans.com/category/germany/
Hitler, http://justice4germans.com/category/hitler/
News,http://justice4germans.com/category/news/
Rothschild,http://justice4germans.com/category/rothschild/
World War II,http://justice4germans.com/category/world-war-ii/
Zionism  http://justice4germans.com/category/zionism/
antisemitism,http://justice4germans.com/tag/antisemitism/
boycott,http://justice4germans.com/tag/boycott/
Churchill,http://justice4germans.com/tag/churchill/
England,http://justice4germans.com/tag/england/
financial war,http://justice4germans.com/tag/financial-war/
Germany,http://justice4germans.com/tag/germany/
history,http://justice4germans.com/tag/history/
Hitler,http://justice4germans.com/tag/hitler/
International Jewry,http://justice4germans.com/tag/international-jewry/
National Socialism,http://justice4germans.com/tag/national-socialism/
truth,http://justice4germans.com/tag/truth/
war,http://justice4germans.com/tag/war/
World War II, http://justice4germans.com/tag/world-war-ii/
WWII  http://justice4germans.com/tag/wwii/
5 Commentshttp://justice4germans.com/2014/12/15/1938-news-report-confirms-international-jewish-banker-financial-war-aims/#comments
http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/03/video-gerd-schultze-rhonhof-on-the-war-that-had-many-fathers-with-english-subtitles/
VIDEO: Gerd
Schultze-Rhonhof on ‘The War That Had Many Fathers’ with English Subtitles
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51z0fxKyjZL.jpg
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51z0fxKyjZL.jpg
MajorGeneral
GerdSchultze-Rhonhof (ret.) talks about his groundbreaking revisionist history of the run-up to the Second World War,
The War That Had Many Fathers” (DerKrieg der viele Väter hatte). This is German with English sub-titles.
Pleasebe sure to enable “C.C.” on the YouTube video player.
This fascinating lecture has racked more than 200,000 views in various uploads on YouTube, but despite the existence of an excellent Portuguese translation, until now there has been no English version available for the rest of us. Break the spell of more than seven decades of “Allied” propaganda and try seeing the run-up to 1 September 1939 as the Germans did.
The results might surprise you. Essential viewing!
http://www.amazon.com/1939-War-That-Many-Fathers/dp/144668623X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1413878843&sr=1-1&keywords=gerd+schultze-rhonhof
Note 1: According to Duff Cooper’s own account of the event, as published in his 1953 volume of memoirs “Old Men Forget,” his wife did not read the Sixteen Points, but rather heard them on the radio when they were broadcast by the BBC, belatedly, on 31 August 1939:
“On the morning of September 1st I played golf at Goodwood. I never played worse. I couldn’t concentrate on the game because I was thinking of what had happened the night before. We had listened to the eleven o’clock news and had heard the German sixteen points to Poland given out without commentary.
I was horrified. And was the more horrified because Diana [his wife] hearing them said that they did not seem to her unreasonable. I tried to explain to her how they meant the end of Poland, but I felt that the reactions of millions of people might be the same as hers.
“I rang up Winston, who said he felt exactly as I did, but that he had
already spoken to the Daily Mail, who were inclined to take a favorable view of the German proposals. . . . I then got on to Camrose [William Berry, Baron (later Viscount) Camrose, owner of the Daily Telegraph and other papers], who also agreed with me. . . . I urged that the Daily Telegraph should come out with a strong leading article condemning the terms.
“When we had finished our round of golf we went into the club house for a drink. Two men sitting at the bar were discussing future race-meetings. One of the two, the secretary, I knew slightly. As we left he said to me, ‘Hitler started on Poland this morning.’ . . . That was how I heard that the second World War had begun. As we drove back to Bognor my heart felt lighter than it had for a year.”
— Old Men Forget (London: Ruper Hart Davis, 1953), p. 257
Despite his faulty “staging” of the event (perhaps the result of
extrapolating from secondary sources), Schultze-Rhonhof thus clearly has the gist of the story correct:  Duff Cooper—and Winston Churchill, too — were alarmed at the prospect of the British public finding the program of the Sixteen Points a reasonable alternative to war, and used their influence with the press to ensure that it be presented in as unfavorable a light as possible.
(For the original Sixteen Points, see “Documents on the Events Preceding the Outbreak of the War” http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/pre%E2%80%A6
http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/pre-war/1933-00-00a.pdf , pp. 485-8. A recording of the 1939 BBC broadcast which Diana Cooper heard is available on the BBC site: http://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/ww2outbr%E2%80%A6
http://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/ww2outbreak/7913.shtml .)
Note 2: The passage from Churchill’s speech @ 33:58
  is not in fact a direct quotation, but rather a loose paraphrase of his remarks taken from a secondary German source (Erich Kern, “Verheimlichte Dokumente: Was den Deutschen verschwiegen wird
http://www.amazon.de/Verheimlichte-Dokumente-Deutschen-verschwiegen-wird/dp/3924309264/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1417649437&sr=1-1&keywords=Verhei
mlichte+Dokumente.+Was+den+Deutschen+verschwiegen+wird“). Churchill’s actual words from the most relevant part of the speech, as recorded in the Hansard transcripts, are as follows:
“The removal of the just grievances of the vanquished ought to precede the disarmament of the victors. I hope I have made that quite clear. To bring about anything like equality of armaments, if it were in our power to do so, which it happily is not, while those grievances remain unredressed, would be almost to appoint the day for another European war—to fix it as if it were a prize fight.
It would be far safer to reopen questions like those of the
Danzig Corridor, and Transylvania, with all their delicacy and difficulty, in cold blood and in a calm atmosphere and while the victor nations still have ample superiority, than to wait and drift on, inch by inch and stage by stage, until once again vast combinations, equally matched, confront each other face to face.”
http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/co%E2%80%A6
http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1932/nov/23/debate-on-the-address
Note also that the correct date for the speech is 23 (not 24) November 1932, and that it was given before the House of Commons. (Schultze-Rhonhof incorrectly states that it was an “Oberhausrede,” i.e., a speech before the [“Upper”] House of Lords.)
***
See also: Danzig and WWIIhttp://justice4germans.com/danzig-and-wwii/
Video: 1939 German News Report on Ethnic-German Refugees from Poland
http://justice4germans.com/2013/02/24/video-1939-german-news-report-on-ethnic-german-refugees-from-poland/ 
Polish Atrocities Against the German Minority in Poland (official NS Germanygovt report)
http://archive.org/details/PolishAtrocitiesAgainstTheGermanMinorityInPolan/
100 Documents on the Origin of the War (German White Book)
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/100_Documents_On_The_Origin_Of_The_War-Selected_From_Official_German_White_Book-1939-254pgs-POL.pdf
What the World Rejected: Hitler’s Peace Offers 1933-1939
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/nothanks/wwr00.html
Video: Hitler’s War – What the Historians Neglect to Mention
http://justice4germans.com/2012/10/16/documentary-hitlers-war-what-the-historians-neglect-to-mention/
Comment:  I have been aware of the great work of Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof for several years, and have mentioned him in some earlier posts. I have one of his books and had seen a number of his presentations on YouTube.
Until now, these were only available in German. His work is not well known or accepted in Germany where he has been denounced by the media lackeys, politicians and court historians of the victors and occupiers as a “right-wing extremist”, “Neo-Nazi”,  etc.  Nothing could be further from the truth. He is a man of honour and integrity, and great courage.Something which those shameful traitors and whores know NOTHING about.
In the allegedly liberated FRG/BRD, the truth is “verboten”.  By the way, I believe that a good portion of
the documentary “Hitlers Krieg – Was Guido Knopp Verschweigt (Hitler’s War –What the Historians Neglect to Mention) was also based uponSchultze-Rhonhof’s research.
I wish to thank the person who took the time to translate this presentation and to create the English sub-titles, as well as, to upload it along with the nice commentary in the description area of the video, which I have quoted verbatim above.  Thanks also to a reader Karl M. for letting me know about this. I have a number of draft posts that I have been working on, and this fits well with a few of them, and with others which I have already published. Finally…
Dankeschoen Herr Schultze-Rhonhof fuer Ihre tolle Arbeit und Bemuehungen, aber noch viel mehr fuer Ihren Mut. Sie sind ein wahrer Held des Volkes. Nur die Wahrheit wird uns letztendlich, von der Gross Luege und Schande des 20. Jahrhunderts befreien. Moege Gott Sie segnen!
J4G
World War I: Britain’s Share of Guilt
http://justice4germans.com/2014/11/27/world-war-i-britains-share-of-guilt/
http://justice4germans.com/2014/11/27/world-war-i-britains-share-of-guilt/black-poppy2/ the first casualty of war is truthAndreas van de Kamp Staatsstreich.at 9. September 2014
For mainstream historians Britain’s declaration of war to Germany a hundred years ago was driven by dire necessity. But two recently published books are critical of this notion. The first one posits, that the war was indeed consequence of the conscious encirclement of Germany; a move that was executed by Whitehall, but masterminded by a shadowy elite in the UK.
The second book does not share this point of view, but maintains that the British entry to the War was no forgone conclusion at all.
100 years after the starting shot for the XX century, hundreds of books have been published and no one still is paying attention to Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty, which was a political fabrication from the start.
“The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of
Germany and her allies.”
Most of today’s observers have come to rather nuanced conclusions. In their view the war was result of an exceedingly complex situation. And while each and any of the European powers had contributed to such an instable system not one of them was able to manage it. Christopher Clarks “Sleepwalkers
http://www.amazon.de/The-Sleepwalkers-Europe-Went-1914/dp/0141027827/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1410275897&sr=8-1&keywords=Sleepwalkers” illustrates this
line of thinking.
Gerry Docherty und James Macgregor try to draw a different picture. In their
Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Hidden-History-Secret-Origins-First/dp/1780576307
” they say, that a certain faction of Britain’s upper class is to blame. In
essence Docherty and MacGregor concur with the so called encirclement doctrine, which became popular in Germany beginning in 1907 – and again after the German surrender in 1918 and the horrible consequences of the defeat.
Of course Docherty and Macgregor, both Scotsmen, do not have to rely on the word of German leaders, who after the war had every motive to deflect attention from themselves. They try to make sense of what has been unearthed during the last 100 years. That is the strongest point of the book.
The weakest point is, that they are not able to produce something like a “smoking gun” for their main argument. Theirs is a new and old narrative of what had been happening before the start of the war. In this regard, it does not differ from the accounts, which are given by the mainstream historians.
Much of their narrative can’t be referenced either.
The secret elite came into being during the last 20 years of the 19th
century. It was an offspring of the traditional English upper class, mainly consisting of aristocrats, manufacturers and top level civil servants.
Caroll Quigley, an American history professor, calls the clique in question
“Milner group”, after one of the trustees for Cecil Rhode’s legacy. Cecil Rhodes and Lord Salisbury were the “departure points”, from where the band had started out. Both of them died after the turn of the century.
They cannot be counted as players in the years leading up to 1914.
The Milner group in itself for sure has to be considered. Writes Quigley:
“To be sure, this secret society is not a childish thing like the Ku Klux
Klan, and it does not have any secret robes, secret handclasps, or secret passwords. It does not need any of these, since its members know each other intimately.”
The conspirators must have become convinced that their own business, even the very existence of the British Empire, was endangered by Berlin. That’s why they ushered in a long term policy to isolate and destroy their continental enemy No. 1.
After a landslide election defeat in 1906 the Tories, to which the Milner group had a natural leaning, lost power. But for various reasons this did not affect the political clout of the cabal.
Although almost all members of the bloc had been conservatives, the “chief exceptions were the four leaders of the Liberal Party after Gladstone, who were strong imperialists: Rosebery, Asquith, Edward Grey, and Haldane. These four supported the Boer War, grew increasingly anti-German, supported the World War in 1914, and were close to the Milner Group politically, intellectually, and socially.”
So ironically whig governments turned out to be the ones, that let Britain side with detested czarist Russia. They prepared the war against the central powers. To conceal that to Liberal MPs, his political base, Grey had to resort to permanent obfuscation and disinformation.
The crucial year came in 1907, when a British-Russian convention was signed, thereby giving birth to the Triple Entente. This change of sea was accompanied by Alaxander Isvolsky on the Russian side, whom Docherty and Macgregor suspect to have been an asset of their hidden élite.
“The growth of national resentments across the Balkans against Turkey and Austria-Hungary”, they write, ” was deliberately stirred by the agents of the Secret Elite”.
“Serbia was groomed for a very special role. She was perfectly placed as the epicentre for a seismic explosion, that would blow away the old order.”
“(But) As far as the secret elite was concerned, the raison d’etre for the Balkan crisis was to get Austria to react to severe provocation in order to draw Germany in. It was about Germany. It had always been about Germany.”
In the previous crises in the Balkans and North Africa Germany had reacted in a rather defensive mode and the only blame that could be attached to Berlin in July 1914 was, that it did not urge more restraint from Austria Hungary. But Germany’s Geo-strategic position was already set at this point in time and could not have been altered.
This angle is very much contrary to what German students were told in high school and the opposite of what their mainstream professional historians have taught (at least after Fritz Fischer’s Germany’s aims in the First World War in 1961).*
Douglas Newton, the author of the second book, is not an academic outsider like the Scotsmen, but he is not English either. He is Australian and he is much more mainstream than Docherty/Macgregor. His recently published
“Darkest Days
https://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Darkest-Days-Behind-Britains/dp/1781683506
deals with what happened in London the week before the British declaration of war in London. Newton doubts that the UK had no choice but to enter the war.
He concentrates on how the war party in the Asquith government managed to have its will, although many Liberal MPs objected to a war.
“The minority of Cabinet interventionists eventually ‘jockeyed’ the
neutralist majority into a rushed choice for war on Sunday 2. August, in the shape of a pledge of naval assistance to France. The pledge locked Britain into any war before news of the German ultimatum to Belgium.”
“Throughout the crisis, the Cabinet’s pro-Entente leaders were manipulative and deceptive. They made crucial decisions outside the Cabinet, which steered the neutralist majority toward war. There was no democratic decision for war.”
But neither Asquith’s deception tactics during the July crisis nor the
(un)democratic character of its decision are at the core of the issue.
The English politicians might have acted hesitantly then and they might have squandered opportunities to preserve peace in doing so.
But all in all London cannot be blamed to have jumped the gun or to have acted as a fire accelerant – not in July 1914. Of course the same can be said of Kaiser Wilhelm and his chancellor Bethmann Hollweg at the time.
This is true, although there had been powerful lobbies both in England and Germany, pushing their respective country onto a path to war.
It was prior to July 1914, that Asquith, Haldane, Churchill, Grey and Lloyd George had been at the service of the war party in UK: by their massive naval rearmament (which, admittedly, can be seen as a response to German action); by their plans to strangle Germany by a naval blockade, by the creation of an expeditionary force and their secret diplomacy with France and Russia, as well as their help in corrupting the Belgian neutrality. The whole Triple Entente was not a defensive scheme to boot.
One can regard this as the natural foreign policy of Liberal imperialists. Or you can concur with Docherty/Macgregor in saying, that those politicians had helped in fulfilling the wish of an all powerful secret group, the destruction of a competing world power by all means necessary.
***
Andreas van de Kamp is an independent Journalist
SOURCE:  http://staatsstreich.at/world-war-i-britains-share-of-guilt.html
* Indeed, to this day, school children in occupied Germany are indoctrinated to believe the long discredited view that World War I was entirely due to “German aggression”.  When asked, many balk at the notion that it could have been anything else. They will tell you that you must be crazy.
Why this indoctrination? Because it otherwise may lead them to question German guilt with respect to World War II (and everything else under the sun). That is strictly “VERBOTEN!”
Free Germany http://justice4germans.com/2013/07/23/music-video-wake-up-germany/free-germany/

*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only ***
CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, thismaterial is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet
Browser. Please check for daily real news posts and support the truth! free book download:  http://tinyurl.com/2afxwx2
Senders do not necessarily agree with contents;*** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only. ***  NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection………. IF anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955
Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire & are all intended for intellectual entertainment only. To be removed from the truth news list, please reply with the subject line “REMOVE”.
This communication may be unlawfully collected and stored by the National Security Agency (NSA) in secret who routinely may be passing collected communication to other parties illegally.
The parties to this email do not consent to the retrieving or storing of this communication and any related metadata, as well as printing, copying, re-transmitting, disseminating, or otherwise using it. If you believe you have received this communication in error, please delete it immediately.

USAMA BIN LADIN WAS DEAD IN 2001, YOU DUMMY, BUT THERE IS NO EVIDENCE AT ALL THAT ADOLF HITLER DIED IN 1945!

 HITLER - Died In Argentina, Interview with the book author
<a href="/channel/UCLAbQuynVgGZyoVsmvdthZg" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-ytid="UCLAbQuynVgGZyoVsmvdthZg" data-name="" data-sessionlink="ei=GtuiVPftKKWN0wW_z4CICQ">Scott Webb</a>
There were six Hitler doubles!  Where have they gone?

Gerrard Williams - The Escape Of Adolf Hitler

<a href="/channel/UCXQk2KmlDTfvAXeIvBfS5jw" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-ytid="UCXQk2KmlDTfvAXeIvBfS5jw" data-sessionlink="ei=9dyiVO7_Isqg0wWIgIGABA" data-name="">ZeroSixtyFive</a>
 A Fourth Reich In The Sun? - Hitler's Escape to Argentina
<a href="/channel/UCQZdMTHwIw_fZRk0wI8oqkQ" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-name="" data-ytid="UCQZdMTHwIw_fZRk0wI8oqkQ" data-sessionlink="ei=Sd2iVNOKCqGW0AXD64CoBQ">Dismantle The Matrix</a>


New Book by Harry Cooper: "Hitler In Argentina"

<a href="/channel/UCq_cU6T2ZV615tFHRIAEPCQ" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-ytid="UCq_cU6T2ZV615tFHRIAEPCQ" data-name="" data-sessionlink="ei=It6iVK3NO8Sn0QXgvIGQBQ">RaisingKundalini2</a>

ISRAEL AND USAMERICA DID 9/11 BY CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN

0
0
ISRAEL AND USAMERICA DID 9/11 BY CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN

http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book

Solving 9-11 - Christopher Bollyn

www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book
2 Apr 2013 - Index to Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World ... of Solving 9/11; The Book in PDF Format; How to read the book online; Table ...


<a href="/channel/UCYwe5YMM0SljRICye9kPDkg" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-sessionlink="ei=W9ahVPOLEo6TcOesgLAJ" data-ytid="UCYwe5YMM0SljRICye9kPDkg" data-name="">sd911truth</a>

TRUTHJIHAD.COM WISHES SAYONARA TO BIB !

0
0

If you like this blog

Don't miss Kevin Barrett's radio shows! And visit TruthJihad.com for more...

Tuesday, December 30, 2014


Obama's secret letter to Iran revealed!


US President Barack Obama has been sending secret letters to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei. But the full text of these letters has never before been revealed.

But now, in his latest stunning revelation, Edward Snowden has hacked into White House computers and acquired a copy of Obama's most recent letter to Tehran. In exchange for a fistful of US toilet paper dollars, which nobody in Moscow seems to realize are not worth the paper they're printed on, Snowden agreed to provide TruthJihad.com with exclusive access to the letter. In the interest of world peace, intercultural understanding, cute kitties, and other warm fuzzy things, we are reprinting the full text below.

-Dr. Kevin Barrett, Editor, TruthJihad.com

*

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei
Residence of the Supreme Leader
Tehran, Iran


Dear Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei,


Seasons greetings from your ol' pal Barry. May I call you Ali? Love that moniker! As a kid I had a crush on Ali McGraw. Did you ever see her in Love Story or Goodbye Columbus? Yes, I know she's Jewish, but hey, we're not anti-Semites, are we? Just because you Iranians are always pointing out that Hollywood is completely dominated by Jewish Zionists doesn't mean we can't admit that some of those Jewish girls are, quite frankly, hotter than an Auschwitz oven. Speaking of which, you do realize there were ovens in Auschwitz, don't you? I understand you guys had a conference a few years ago…but we'd better not go there, since if I say the wrong thing Angela will have me arrested next time I'm in Berlin.

Ahem…anyway, I'm writing to congratulate you on that new suicide drone. Seems like ages since I've been trying to tell my Republican friends that deep down inside, you Iranians want to be just like us. Well, here's proof. We kill people with drones, now you're following in our footsteps. Next thing you know you'll have a McDonalds and Wal-Mart on every corner and you'll all be working at minimum wage service jobs…maybe even taking up American-style democracy, with elections on sale to the highest bidder. Could I interest you in some black box electronic voting machines?

And speaking of your new suicide drone, I was wondering if you could do me a little favor and take out Bibi Netanyahu? You and I both know he's maybe the world's most dangerous terrorist. (I would show you the top secret Veterans Today document proving Bibi personally smuggled a WTC-demolition nuke into New York inside his diplomatic-immunity-protected briefcase, but then we'd have to kill you.)

You're probably wondering why I don't just take him out myself. Believe me, I'd love to. But if I did that, Abe Foxman would have a hissy fit…maybe even a heart attack. And what would we do with ourselves if we didn't have Abe to kick around any more?

Gotta go! Michael, I mean Michelle, needs me to adjust her shoulder pads. Please do let me know if that oil price collapse Kerry engineered with the Saudis is a problem - I'd be happy to send Soros over there to help you jack up your currency, all you have to do is swear on a Qur'an that you'll promote LGBT rights and beam pornography at your citizens 24/7/365 and let Rothschild have your central bank. Oh yes, and do a couple of little "structural adjustments," like I'm off to do with Michelle right now.

Ta ta my man!

Your pal,

Barry


Russia warns West of Nuclear World War 3 over Iran tensions! (12/4/2011)

<a href="/channel/UCMG4sb6tHJhd7AtfQ6DpsuQ" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-sessionlink="ei=0PidVJ2DNcbb0QXZw4HQAQ" data-ytid="UCMG4sb6tHJhd7AtfQ6DpsuQ" data-name="">ADRENALINEJUNKY -JASON HENDRICKS</a>
RUSSIAN QUENELLE TO OBAMA









 JEWISH MYEDVYEDYEV IS VERY SERIOUS!



USAMERICAN DEMOCRACY

 ALOHA OBAMA AND BIBI !


The Only Way to Stop the Empire



The Only Way to Stop the Empire 

By Gary Flomenhoft
December 02, 2014 "ICH" - "ClubOrlov"
 
The final days of US empire are fast approaching. Perhaps its end will pass slowly and gradually, or perhaps the event will unfold rapidly and catastrophically. Maybe chaos will break loose, or maybe its demise will be organized well and proceed smoothly. This nobody knows, but the end of empire is coming as surely as day follows night and sun follows rain. Overexpansion, overreach and over-indebtedness will take their toll—as all past empires have discovered. Empires are like bacteria in a Petrie dish; unthinking, unseeing, unfeeling, they expand until they run out of food or contaminate their environment with their waste, and then they die. They are automatons, and they just can’t help it: they are programmed to expand or die, expand or die, and, in the end, expand and die. 

What does the empire feed on? It feeds on money and fear; your money and your fear, both obtained with your cooperation. It is bigger now than when it faced an actual adversary in the Soviet Union. Russia is no adversary; all it wants is to be a normal country, at peace with the world. But the empire won’t let it, will it? It must create enemies. Who are our enemies? According to the authors of endless war they are North Korea, Iran, Syria, and Islamic terrorists. Are any of them actually capable of threatening the US? Well, yes, but they are all quite easy to deter. But the plan of the authors of endless war is not to deter them; it is to back them into a corner with political instability and sanctions, while whipping up the population on both sides into fear-filled frenzy. 

We all know that the US military-industrial complex has become a self-perpetuating and uncontrollable organism, just like Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us in 1961. Everyone knows the phrase and Eisenhower's warning—it is part of our collective memory. At a trillion dollars a year and growing, with over 1000 bases ringing the planet, it has expanded far beyond what Eisenhower could have imagined in his worst nightmare. We can’t say we didn’t know: he warned us. After the National-Socialist episode in Germany, many good Germans voiced regrets at not speaking up, claiming that they didn’t know what was being done in their name. But we do not have that excuse: we all knew all along. 

Nor was it the first time we were warned. General Smedley Butler told us before, in 1933, and his words are still with us, posted online. Why is it that everyone, generals included, suddenly gain wisdom immediately upon reaching retirement? Butler offered an explanation: his “mind was in suspended animation while serving as a soldier and following orders.” In 1933 Butler told us that he “was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.” He said: 
 
I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912…I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.

This empire is nothing new, and we knew what it is and what it does all along. We can’t say we didn’t know. We have watched throughout our lives as the US put down every popular uprising against local autocrats and oligarchs, placed countries under US control, then helped organize and train the death squads that killed off the opposition. Think of Indonesia, Argentina, or Honduras. We watched as the empire crushed every democratic government that threatened US business interests under the false pretext of “anti-communism,” starting with Iran in 1953, Guatemala in 1954, and proceeding to Congo, Haiti (numerous times), and most notably and infamously Chile in 1973 (assassinating president Salvador Allende on September 11, 1973), Nicaragua in the 1980’s, and many, many others. (For details see William Blum’s Killing Hope.) And of course, many of us lived through the epic lies and genocide of millions in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia during the so-called “Vietnam War.” We knew, we watched, and we paid taxes that paid for the bullets and the bombs. 

More recently we’ve seen the barefaced lies of empire laid out for all to see in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Somalia, Georgia, Pakistan, Yemen, Ukraine... they never end! But the trouble we stir up in other places never seems to come home and ring our doorbell, does it? Maybe that’s why it keeps on going. We think that we can just ignore it and go on with our lives—that it won’t affect us. Or does it? 

Let’s leave aside the destruction of democracy that always accompanies a militarized, fascist police state that the US has gradually turned into. And let’s ignore the violence that pervades US society, or the vast gulag of incarceration that disposes of our useless eaters. Consider that the only military attack on US soil that actually scored a palpable hit since Pearl Harbor was 9/11. Pearl Harbor was on the periphery, way out in the Pacific, “A Day that will live in Infamy,” the more so since FDR knew it was coming and did all he could to provoke it by cutting Japan off from oil supplies, directly provoking it into launching the attack. But Hawaii is the periphery while 9/11 struck at the heart of the empire, the financial center in New York that drives the imperial wealth pump, and the Pentagon, which is charged with the mission of US world domination. 

Whether you believe that 19 Arabs armed with box cutters who couldn’t fly propeller planes took down 3 World Trade buildings that plummeted straight down at the speed of freefall in what looked like controlled demolition (yes there were 3, look up “Building 7”), and destroyed a section of the Pentagon, or whether you believe it was an inside job, doesn’t matter. The point is, in that act of destruction, the wars of the empire finally came home. 

What was the result? Did these events cause us to reconsider what we are doing? Of course not! Instead, we went all-in for war. Remember, the empire is an automaton, a self-perpetuating organism, living on money and fear. What better way to whip up fear than to stage, or to allow, or to simply fail to prevent, an attack on the “homeland”—which is, by the way, a Nazi propaganda term. The purpose of war is simply to cause more war, since it is so profitable for the badly misnamed “defense industry.” Butler told us in 1933 that “war is a racket,” and documented massive war profiteering during WWI. Do you know how much money Lockheed, Northrop-Grumman, Boeing, General Dynamics, Raytheon et al. are making from the “War on Terror”? The sums are astronomical.

As you read these words, the empire is busy doing its work in Ukraine. Here is how that works. First, it overthrows the elected government in a US-backed coup. Next, it directs its local puppet regime to unleash a military attack and organize death squads to deal with the population in the east that won't go along with the US-backed coup, in this case using actual Nazi-branded death squads, complete with Nazi SS Insignias. (Anyone can verify these facts with the most cursory internet search.) And for the final, consummate imperialist touch, it votes in the UN (together with Canada) against a resolution condemning the Ukrainian Nazis and other racist murderers, while the Europeans shamefacedly abstain. This sort of plan used to work really well, and so the empire keeps repeating it over and over again, even though the results are worse every time.

Vast numbers of Americans support the empire’s wars of conquest because they help maintain their lavish lifestyles. They bother some of us more than others. Many of us are adamantly against them, but only a few find it emotionally unbearable to countenance the destruction of millions of lives in our names and with our money. What makes them different? Who knows, you would have to ask a psychologist. 

The question for those who oppose endless war is, What have we done about it? A mass movement in the 1960’s that added up to an uprising by a vast segment of society perhaps had something to do with ending the conflict in Vietnam. In spite of these protests, the empire was able to extend the war by an extra five years all the way to 1973, when it agreed to end it on the same terms that had been offered in 1968 to Nobel “peace laureate” Henry Kissinger. There has been no significant anti-war protest since then, and certainly none that succeeded in preventing or ending war. Why? 

First, the draft was ended. This put an end to the involvement of average US families in the wars of empire, and therefore ending the requirement for consent of the governed. The strategists realized that the draft was a disaster for the empire. The new, much better and cheaper way to procure cannon fodder for the endless war is to enlist the children of the underclass, by using economic oppression in order to deprive them of any other means of advancement except military service. 

Second, the military has been outsourced and privatized, requiring even less involvement by US families in the military, and less need for their consent. “You’re all volunteers, so shut up” is the attitude. 

Third, the vastly increased scope of domestic spying by the NSA and other government agencies has helped keep everyone under control and stifle dissent. 

Fourth is the tight government/corporate control of the US media, which has become consummately successful in brainwashing and propagandizing the population. 

Finally, there is the war on whistleblowers and journalists who expose the truth, from Tom Drake to William Binney, Sibel Simons, Jesselyn Radack, Bradley Manning and Julian Assange. If necessary, the police, who are vastly more militarized than in the past, together with national guard troops, can squash any dissent like a bug. All these measures ensure that efforts at reform pursued through legal, nonviolent means such as voting, protest, civil disobedience, civil resistance, etc. will have absolutely no effect. The only action that can possibly stop the empire in its tracks is cutting off its food supply—the tax money on which it lives. We have to starve the beast through divestment, capital expatriation, tax resistance, tax refusal and tax revolt. Former Secretary of State Alexander Haig told us this flat out in the 1980’s when, being confronted with huge protests over US Central American policy, he said: “Let them protest all they want as long as they pay their taxes.” Truer words were never uttered by a US official. Is there any evidence to contradict his statement? Has any other measure had any impact on the war machine? The honest answer is no. Millions of people around the world protested before the 2003 invasion of Iraq. These protests were ignored. No amount of protest or other efforts can stop it, because it doesn’t cut off the empire’s food supply of money and fear. Only by cutting off its funds by not paying taxes can we stop the empire. 

Many have said that the US doesn’t need tax money as it survives on endless debt. Yes, the empire lives on debt, but the ability to sell debt is based on the bond rating of US treasury bonds. Most recently in June, 2014 S&P gave the US a AA+ rating with “stable outlook.”

If there is any doubt about the US credit rating, the ability to sell debt to continue financing the empire comes into question. The ability to collect taxes is what maintains the US bond rating. Any reduction of the US bond rating, and interest rates have to go up in order to continue attracting more investment. Then the interest on the debt balloons out of control and becomes unrepayable—never mind the principal, which they have no intention of ever paying back. By the way, the Tea Party’s efforts to shut down government by refusing to raise the debt ceiling was helping this effort for a time, although for different reasons. They thought that the welfare system is bankrupting the country. This is a laughable claim, because welfare spending looks negligible when compared to military spending. Still, they did manage to lower the bond rating for a time. Shutting down the federal government is a step in the right direction, and since in recent years only the Tea Party has managed to do it, lets give them some credit 

If the US became unable to reliably collect taxes, then its ability to finance the empire with debt would be diminished, and the US would have to turn to increasing taxes—another politically unpalatable choice, especially in the age of the Tea Party, when the empire’s main constituency is dead-set against more taxes.
So it is absolutely clear that the only thing that could stop the empire is a tax revolt. It wouldn’t even have to be that big; the slightest question about the ability of the federal government to collect taxes could reduce the bond rating. Even a minor reduction could raise interest rates enough to make the US debt unrepayable. 

Let's get down to brass tacks: How do you avoid paying taxes, when the IRS withholds our salaries, and the tables are rigged to withhold about 15% more than necessary on average, so 80% of people get a refund? Did you think that this is a coincidence? No, this is a one-year interest-free loan to the empire from taxpayers. But it’s actually quite simple not to pay taxes. Get a W-4 form, write EXEMPT in the space provided, and turn it in to your friendly HR office. Your employer is not allowed to change it unless directed by the IRS. Normally they have no reason to question it. 

Here’s what happened last time it was tried on a big scale. In 2007, Code Pink joined the War Resisters League to organize a national project for war tax refusal, to “Stop Bush’s Wars.” This was not a true tax revolt, just more or less a referendum on how many people would potentially support withholding a portion of their taxes owed, even a token amount. The online petition asked people if they would be willing to commit to withhold some of their taxes, even $1, if 100,000 other people would agree to do the same. Out of the US population of 316 million, how many people do you think signed it? About 2,000. So you see, there is not much evidence that people will do the only thing that could stop the empire: a true Tea Party tax revolt. 

What this implies is that the empire will continue to churn along, and debt will continue to build up, because any other approach to paying for it is not feasible, and therefore collapse is inevitable. The aftermath of collapse is unpredictable; maybe there will be a soft landing, maybe not. But unless you are willing to engage in some form of tax revolt, collapse is inevitable. You will get to live with the results: stage a tax revolt now, or face collapse later. 

Are you sure you want to take your chances on collapse? The results of a personal tax revolt are predictable: retribution with penalties and interest from the IRS; living in fear of having your salary, your property, even your house seized, or worse, your door broken down by federal agents (although these extreme measures don’t happen too often, they happen often enough to instill fear). Perhaps there would be loss of income, or even your job. Losing one’s job often leads to depression, divorce, drug or alcohol abuse, etc. So you may prefer collapse after all: loss of your savings, no heat, electricity or trash removal, shops looted or closed, armed gangs roaming the streets... Your choice! 

On the other hand, collapse might go well! Hope springs eternal in the optimistic American heart. We are (or used to be) the “can-do” people. Maybe we can-do collapse better than anyone else? Doubtful though if you read Dmitry Orlov’s Collapse Gap presentation.

The results of collapse later are likely to be worse then the effects of tax revolt now. Especially, since the IRS takes years to catch up to exempt W-4 forms, and it would be even harder to crack down if it were being was done en masse. But it’s perfectly understandable if you opt to do nothing now and suffer no consequences, while engaging in ineffective protest to assuage your conscience. You probably have a family to support, an expensive hobby, or some other excuse. So you decide to take your chances with collapse later. After all, collapse might turn out OK for you! This psychology is quite understandable. I truly hope that collapse will be as painless as you wish it will be, but somehow I doubt it. Good luck though! Whatever happens, you will have to live with your decision for the rest of your life—be it long or short. 
 
Signed, expat and long-time conscientious tax refuser, Gary Flomenhoft.

Veterans Today

Islamic Churchill: His Greatest Quotes

"British Bulldog" rallies the Muslims

by Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor


[Check out the “Islamic Churchill” quotes in easy-to-read format at the TruthJihad blog]

2
We learned this week that Winston Churchill considered converting to Islam. But what if he really did convert – and it was hushed up? A deep cover source at MI-6 has provided TruthJihad.com with documents claiming that Churchill took shahadah and lived his life as a Muslim. But since the British people weren’t quite ready for that, Churchill was assigned MI-6 handlers to follow him around and keep his Muslim identity hidden. The handlers also censored Churchill’s letters and speeches.
Today, as the New World Order wages the Global War on Islam (GWOI) launched by the satanic 9/11 inside job, these quotes are more relevant than ever.

Below are the Muslim Churchill’s greatest quotes as he wrote them. MI-6 alterations are indicated by strikeover and boldface.

It is no use saying, ‘We are doing our best.’ You have got to succeed in doing the will of God.what is necessary.”

“We shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end. We shall wage jihadfight in France, we shall wage jihadfight on the seas and the oceans, we shall wage jihadfight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Ummahisland, whatever the cost may be. We shall wage jihadfight on the beaches, we shall wage jihadfight on the landing grounds, we shall wage jihadfight in the fields and in the streets, we shall wage jihadfight in the hills; we shall never surrender to anyone but God.”

“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent vicevirtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries; while the inherent virtue of Islam is in sharing by holy charity and not by force.”

“It has been said that shariahdemocracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.”

“What kind of a people do the Zioniststhey think we are? Is it possible they do not realise that we shall never cease to persevere against them until they have been taught a lesson which they and the world will never forget?”

“If you have ten thousand regulations you destroy all respect for shariahthe law.”

“Never give in–never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to Allahconvictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to the Zionistsforce; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemies of Godenemy.”

“Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at by CIA drones without result.”

RothschildHitler knows that he will have to break us in this Ummahisland or lose the war for his New World Order. If we can stand up to him, all Muslim nationsEurope may be free and life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands. But if we fall, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science and usury. Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that, if the CaliphateBritish Empire and its Commonwealth lasts for a thousand years, men will still say, ‘This was their finest hour!’”
“Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few as in the defense of Medina.”

“We Muslims have not journeyed across the centuries, across the oceans, across the mountains, across the desertsprairies, because we are made of sugar candy.”

“You have satanic enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for Godsomething, sometime in your life.”


APOCALYPSE 25 - SHAYTAAN US-ISRAEL-UK-EU-UNO HU AKBAR! BEWARE OF YAUM KIPPUR 6015!

0
0


APOCALYPSE 25
SHAYTAAN US-ISRAEL-UK-EU-UNO HU AKBAR! 
BEWARE OF YAUM KIPPUR 6015!
FTMJ JIHAAD
 by Basheer & Ghyslaine
(Not meant for the feeble-minded)

 

John Lennon Famous Words Of Wisdom

<a href="/channel/UC-6fCYB2lmbAmYCoWs5scDw" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-ytid="UC-6fCYB2lmbAmYCoWs5scDw" data-name="" data-sessionlink="ei=4DWkVPK0CcWYcN_igIAL">iwillspyonyou</a>


In the name of freedom, truth, morality and justice, very rare and ever fading commodities, that is, of The One Creator God whether He exists or not, but as conceptualised  in the natural way of life known as Islam, which encompasses all older religions (including Atheism) and brings them to perfection. 
(To all our loved ones as well as adversaries)

This is not a Biblical Lamentation, but a friendly reasoned and reasonable (not ‘rational’ or ‘rationalist’!) account inviting dialogue (in vain) and not hostility or aggressiveness (although Earthlings do not deserve any show of friendliness, except for the very few and the genuinely innocent and compassionate, of course!) of a life-long battle (Jihaad) that great good and foolish humans like Napoleon Bonaparte or Herr Adolph Hitler (and their equally foolish followers) lost yesterday, and also and above all a warning to all Hindu, Buddhist, Jewish, Christian and Muslim hypocrites, cowards and lazy materialists.  Hitler was and is the most hated human of the past, current and for all centuries to come because the Satanic rulers of the world kept his made up (mythical) evilness alive at gun point in order to distract the whole world from more evil (the worst ever in human history) that they are themselves perpetrating with our tax money and slave labour by hiring armies of gangsters, perverts and cut-throats (under various labels!) and six million times (to borrow the so-called and never-ending Jewish Holocaust dogmatic and sacred figure) worse than Hitler’s National Socialist armies and all the armies of the world put together!  By the way there was no Jewish Holocaust or Shoah at the Auschwitz Labour Camp, but many Holocausts of Germans by the Allies and in the Swedish Jew Eisenhower’s Death Camps!  If you want to know where are the missing European Jews, go to USAmerica, Canada, Australia, South America, the United Kingdom, France, Switzerland and Germany!  This is where they are hidden in plain sight!  And Herr Hitler and his wife Eva Brown never committed suicide, but lived happily ever after in the Fourth Reich of Argentina and the US, UK, and EU Diaspora.   We are losing this battle today and will lose it tomorrow as there is indeed no hope of ever winning or even maintaining a semblance of balance between good and evil in this very mysterious world.  Military Europe or the so-called West decreed that this world can never belong to us, but only to a Satanic Judaic Elite and other and forever.


Yes, it is a pessimistic, but not gloomy view of the world.  Paradoxical?  No!  The so-called West and Eretz Israel have proved to the conscious world to be the worst enemies of civilisation, freedom, justice, morality and humankind by systematically destroying any country or nation that tries to be independent of Western Judeo Satanic hegemony and emancipate itself from Western mental and physical slavery and Western perverted ways of life that would make Biblical Sodom and Gomorrah pale in comparison, if these ever existed, of course.  The days we use to travel freely from one country to the other are over for good because the Satanic imperialist monster known as The West (Occident) has established geographical open prisons (boundaries) by merely sitting at their warmongering tables and drawing straight, zigzag and curved lines on a world map and dividing nations for ever, and imposing military, political and economic frontiers and mass destruction embargoes, bloody regimes change, no-fly-zones for them to bomb and slaughter defenceless people with great ease and at  will, imposing forced usury, and all kinds of oppressive measures.  Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya are only three recent examples of Western warmongering savagery and they dare call us primitives.  The uneducated or unconscious world seems to ignore what the West and the US did in the sixties to the biggest Muslim country in the world, Indonesia (or what Britain and their Judeo-Christian Freemasons did in past centuries to Hindustan) on the pretext that they had adopted Communism while they are best friends with Russia in so many domains: wars, culture, science, technology, Atheist religion, dictatorship and the Arts although this seems (just seems) to change slightly.  Iran, the most advanced and independent country in the entire Muslim world, the best Muslim nation in the world in my view is the next target of the Western-Israel hegemonists to be bombed “back to the Dark European Ages”.  Western savagery and hegemony will never stop unless we stop the savages, but we are far from being qualified!  



Because Muslim nations are not adequately armed (due to their own fault and inferior and incorrect world view) to resist Western weapons of mass destruction and deceit, this is where FAITH comes in, faith in a Supreme Intelligence Creator God for a better world to come.  But faith is useless without the effort (Jihaad) and the works.  However, as soon as we become strong, powerful, prosperous and successful materially we do not need God at all except when calamity and disease strike again!  Believers in God always believe in hope for better days here on earth or in a hypothetical after-life, an almost impossibility, and a most unreasonable proposition, yet very comprehensible given the nature and status of most humans.  But, we, humans must be deluded, that is, mentally ill to have faith and hope in a God that does not exist in practice except in the minds of primitive and not well or not yet evolved apes, says (paid by our tax money and on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen!) the Grand Pope of Atheism and anti-Godism Pr Richard Dawkins. But, faith or no faith, hope or no hope, God or no God, do humans not have the right to be free, to speak out the truth, and to expect justice at the hands of their rulers, and the right not to be molested, persecuted, vilified, fined, jailed, tortured, terrorised at the hands of the ruling classes when they freely chose a way of life and a type of education of their choice for their children and grand children that they see as moral over the ones that they see as immoral?  Apparently, humans do not have this right under the current totalitarian democratic dictatorships where only the extremely rich, their army generals and officers, their perverts, monsters, and the speculators have all the rights, and the masses are doomed to eternal slavery and are indoctrinated to be consumerism addicts forever.  



GOD OR THE VIRTUES THAT HE REPRESENTS IS THE ONLY SAVIOUR OF THE OPPRESSED MULTITUDES AROUND THE GLOBE.  And auto suggestion is indeed a very powerful weapon to resolve many or most of humans’ problems.  But, our main obstacle is the lack ofunity among the Believers in good, and the incredible unity of the evil doers.  Right at the onset we see where the problem lies.  The believers for the most part are talkers and not doers because they lack not only unity within one religion and among the religions, but also truthfulness, sincerity, dedication, perseverance, bravery, compassion and obey other Gods than God as they are unwilling or too weak to fight tyranny because this involves great sacrifice in their personal lives, comfort, and even in many cases the sacrifice of their own lives and that of their loved ones.  They waste their lives gossiping about the symptoms of the diseases that afflict humankind and are not interested in the least in tackling the causes.  European Christendom has solved this problem a very long time ago by crucifying God and then by joining the forces of darkness with a false religion: Love the sinner (Satan and his henchmen and henchwomen), but hate or condemn the sin, meaning, let Satan rule forever!  In other words, JUST BELIEVE AND DO NOTHING as they practice knowingly or unknowingly a religion that pleases Satan and not God who ordered them to obey Him Alone and His Commandments (for their success in this life) according to one Gospel:

“He who has my commandments and keeps them, it is he who loves me.  And he who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him” 
(Holy Bible, John 14:21).     


 As they hated God’s Son, they made him into his Father and worship him as God and ended up in hating God Himself!  And Jesus (whether he existed or not or said what was and is attributed to him or not) clearly said to the misled and corrupt Israelites (and not to the world) that his Father and his God are their Father and their God too, but the Churches (a European fabrication) who invented a new religion attributed to the same Jesus Christ said no, and that instead Jesus himself is the Father and God!  This false and Europeanised unchristian religion completely messed up the mind and faith of most of Christendom that eventually lost nearly half of its followers that have today for the most part joined the Anti-Christs or Dajjals under different labels: modern western materialist, consumerist and warmongering civilisation where are more acceptable only the usurers, warmongers, land thieves, exploiters, secret societies, seculars (laïques), libertarians, liberals, humanists, rationalists, anti-God philosophers and scientists, socialists, communists, Zionists, Racists, ethnic cleansers, feminists, abortionists, pornographers, prostitutes, homosexuals, gamblers, alcohol consumers, smokers, and on and on.  The terminology is varied but the evil is the same.  The super military powers decide what a human being is or is not and should be.   We have evolved from being a human into becoming an animal and they call this progress and freedom.   


We do not need François-Marie Arouet, that despicable character popularly known as “Voltaire” and idolised by the West European warmongers and anti-God and Deist intelligentsia alike to know and say with conviction that I would prefer State officials to be democratically elected (and not selected!) on the conditions that the citizens’ fundamental rights are inalienable (God-given rights) and not dependant on the whims and fancies of the manipulated and bought for electorate, and professionals, merchants, religious leaders, scientists, humans or look-like-humans we had to deal with or are frequently victims of, including our spouses, to genuinely believe in the One God or Gods (whether they conclusively exist or not) but with the above attributes of truth, freedom, justice and morality, to truthfully, sincerely, loyally, bravely and with dedication practice those Godly or highly civilised human virtues, because it is thus less likely that we shall be betrayed, deceived, cheated, swindled, robbed, enslaved, “cuckolded” and even annihilated.  And we further do not need “Voltaire” to tell us and to know that if God did not exist, it would be necessary (vital) to invent Him symbolically or otherwise as there is no survival of the human kind without a Merciful and Compassionate God or the Symbol of it.  We have seen how the world has turned out to be in the hands of the Godless and the Anti-God: some half a billion exterminated since “Christopher Colombus, Cristoforo Colombo, Cristóbal Colón, Cristóvão Colombo or whoever (Europeans have the sickening habit of translating and twisting proper names), and mounting every day, currently with Arabs, Middle Easterners and Muslims the main victims of the Satanic Totalitarian Zionist and Fascist World Order.  



God does not have to ‘exist’ to be ‘real’ in the lives of more than half of humanity, including myself, and nearly some 4 billion people worldwide out of 7 billion human and sub-human inhabitants of the planet.  Scientists have been lying all along to force us to believe that we are evolved apes or biologically evolved intelligent beings in permanent and eternal need of Jewish pharmaceutical poisons, public schools, Secret Services, Classified Truth, Satanic Cults, GMO and vaccines to survive, but even if this were true this will not change the above reality of our humanity and humanness in need of a civilised atheist and theist environment and culture.  Perverting the natural ways, stealing, dishonouring our parents, making false testimonies, coveting other people’s property, wives, worshipping the devil, greed, pride, lust, hedonism, selfishness, arrogance, indifference, deceit, tyranny, savagery, enslaving individuals and entire nations, political, social, cultural and State terrorism, and endless lies and false flag operations are all wrong, and as long as humans who prize freedom, truth, justice and a moral way of life will exist this world will know no peace and no happiness except for the tyrants, perverts, thieves and their acolytes (including the so-called Christian Churches, the Hindu and Muslim leadership) who run the world, many as mere puppet dictators and Kings, oppress, terrorise, mass murder, and enslave its inhabitants.  We saw recently Arabia, occupied since the Jewish World War I by the Saudis recently using the same CIA-ALQAEDA myth to crack down on dissenting Arabs and Muslims!  The Anti-God rulers use White European Racial Supremacy, Black racism, Black and White Christian Churches, White Royalties and Colonialism, warmongering Jewish ideologies like Marxism, Socialism, Communism, Zionism, Fascism, Feminism, and Totalitarian Parliamentary or Liberal Democracy to subjugate the entire planet.         



Forget about God, the Gods, Jesus, Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, because we have for the most part already surrendered to the UNO, the Devil in person!  We are not Muslims anymore, but Satanists!  If we want to survive, we need first to unite upon common values like freedom, truth, morality and justice, and then FIGHT not only against ourselves (Jihaad an Nafs) but also against those who have invaded our lands, killed our loved ones, stolen our wealth, enslaved us and destroyed our cultures and civilisation.  All struggle requires strength of body and mind, sincerity, dedication, perseverance, patience and sacrifice, sacrifice to the last man, woman, child and baby, and to the last drop of blood.  And if we refuse this cure, then, let us die and condemn our children and grandchildren to do the job in our place or be exterminated!  

We are no more in the context of ALLAH HU AKBAR but of

SHAYTAAN US-ISRAEL-UK-EU-UNO HU AKBAR! 

And we would be wrong and stupid to blame God for it when we are the ones who made this happen!  And you stupid earthlings, stop hoping for a heavenly Paradise and fearing Hell because they are both right here on Earth and we refuse to see them!  We have become cannibals and we do not even see this and almost everything we take into our body is artificial, Satan manufactured as well as almost everything we put in our reptilian brain incapable of compassion and human warmth.

 USAMERICAN SAVAGES!


Enjoy slavery under Shaytaan or freedom under God.  It is our choice and this will definitely benefit our progeny!  Judaism and Christ have both been hijacked.  Who said so: Christ and Muhammad, you dummies!  And Islam is half dead because Muslim nations (people)  stopped worshipping God and belonging to the Universal Nation of Muhammad, and followed the Ways of Shaytaan instead (usury and so on) , and have been conquered and are slaves to the Empire of Satan.  Lamenting, talking, demonstrating, petitioning the tyrants, all this is useless.  The only weapon we are left with is TOTAL BOYCOTT and GLOBAL RESISTANCE!  And without this REVOLUTION, we will achieve nothing! And no Gods will come to rescue us because THAT God does not exist!  And Jesus will not return you dummies!  Use your brains!  And we do not wish you Happy New Year as you do not deserve it!

 If you did not know Ancient Arabic came before Hebrew despite what the racists tell us, and Hebrew is just a dialect of Ancient Arabic, the same Arabic that Arabic-speaking literates can read on the Rashida (Rosetta) Stone! Beware of YAUM KIPPUR because it is the Day of Atonement when the modern Hebraics and Judaics (those pseudo Semites) become One with God (which one is still a mystery!) and promise everything but fulfil nothing! Read about the Aramaic KOL NIDRÉ vows introduced into the Judaic liturgy and recited in the synagogue before the beginning of the evening service on every Yaum Kippur.

"All [personal] vows we are likely to make, all [personal] oaths and pledges we are likely to take between this Yom Kippur and the next Yom Kippur, we publicly renounce.  Let them all be relinquished and abandoned, null and void, neither firm nor established.  Let our [personal] vows, pledges and oaths be considered neither vows nor pledges nor oaths."

 Trust the Judaic Kippurists and you die! Why do you think decadent Christendom and Freemasonry (Satanists) hired them and gave them all the top jobs?

GOD OR THE VIRTUES THAT HE REPRESENTS IS THE ONLY SAVIOUR OF THE OPPRESSED MULTITUDES AROUND THE GLOBE.  
 

Basheer & Ghyslaine
Sovereign Freeman and Freewoman-on-the-land
Servants of God Alone and of no man or woman
We do not belong to any political or religious Group
We are one Universal Brotherhood and Sisterhood
We never voted in our entire lives
WE ARE FOREVER FREEDOM-TRUTH-MORALITY-JUSTICE JIHAADIS

31st of December 6014

The Bitter Truth


  (Useful as it accumulates a lot of the known information)
 
The 'reality' of ISIS (aka ISILaka Daa3ish) is even more sinister:
 
IT IS AN EXTREME (KHAWARIJI) MURDEROUS CRIMINAL ORGANIASATION


The Reality Behind ISIS.pdf
 





























The Only Way to Stop the Empire


The Only Way to Stop the Empire 

By Gary Flomenhoft
December 02, 2014 "ICH" - "ClubOrlov"
 
The final days of US empire are fast approaching. Perhaps its end will pass slowly and gradually, or perhaps the event will unfold rapidly and catastrophically. Maybe chaos will break loose, or maybe its demise will be organized well and proceed smoothly. This nobody knows, but the end of empire is coming as surely as day follows night and sun follows rain. Overexpansion, overreach and over-indebtedness will take their toll—as all past empires have discovered. Empires are like bacteria in a Petrie dish; unthinking, unseeing, unfeeling, they expand until they run out of food or contaminate their environment with their waste, and then they die. They are automatons, and they just can’t help it: they are programmed to expand or die, expand or die, and, in the end, expand and die. 

What does the empire feed on? It feeds on money and fear; your money and your fear, both obtained with your cooperation. It is bigger now than when it faced an actual adversary in the Soviet Union. Russia is no adversary; all it wants is to be a normal country, at peace with the world. But the empire won’t let it, will it? It must create enemies. Who are our enemies? According to the authors of endless war they are North Korea, Iran, Syria, and Islamic terrorists. Are any of them actually capable of threatening the US? Well, yes, but they are all quite easy to deter. But the plan of the authors of endless war is not to deter them; it is to back them into a corner with political instability and sanctions, while whipping up the population on both sides into fear-filled frenzy. 

We all know that the US military-industrial complex has become a self-perpetuating and uncontrollable organism, just like Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us in 1961. Everyone knows the phrase and Eisenhower's warning—it is part of our collective memory. At a trillion dollars a year and growing, with over 1000 bases ringing the planet, it has expanded far beyond what Eisenhower could have imagined in his worst nightmare. We can’t say we didn’t know: he warned us. After the National-Socialist episode in Germany, many good Germans voiced regrets at not speaking up, claiming that they didn’t know what was being done in their name. But we do not have that excuse: we all knew all along. 

Nor was it the first time we were warned. General Smedley Butler told us before, in 1933, and his words are still with us, posted online. Why is it that everyone, generals included, suddenly gain wisdom immediately upon reaching retirement? Butler offered an explanation: his “mind was in suspended animation while serving as a soldier and following orders.” In 1933 Butler told us that he “was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.” He said: 
 
I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912…I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.
This empire is nothing new, and we knew what it is and what it does all along. We can’t say we didn’t know. We have watched throughout our lives as the US put down every popular uprising against local autocrats and oligarchs, placed countries under US control, then helped organize and train the death squads that killed off the opposition. Think of Indonesia, Argentina, or Honduras. We watched as the empire crushed every democratic government that threatened US business interests under the false pretext of “anti-communism,” starting with Iran in 1953, Guatemala in 1954, and proceeding to Congo, Haiti (numerous times), and most notably and infamously Chile in 1973 (assassinating president Salvador Allende on September 11, 1973), Nicaragua in the 1980’s, and many, many others. (For details see William Blum’s Killing Hope.) And of course, many of us lived through the epic lies and genocide of millions in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia during the so-called “Vietnam War.” We knew, we watched, and we paid taxes that paid for the bullets and the bombs. 

More recently we’ve seen the barefaced lies of empire laid out for all to see in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Somalia, Georgia, Pakistan, Yemen, Ukraine... they never end! But the trouble we stir up in other places never seems to come home and ring our doorbell, does it? Maybe that’s why it keeps on going. We think that we can just ignore it and go on with our lives—that it won’t affect us. Or does it? 

Let’s leave aside the destruction of democracy that always accompanies a militarized, fascist police state that the US has gradually turned into. And let’s ignore the violence that pervades US society, or the vast gulag of incarceration that disposes of our useless eaters. Consider that the only military attack on US soil that actually scored a palpable hit since Pearl Harbor was 9/11. Pearl Harbor was on the periphery, way out in the Pacific, “A Day that will live in Infamy,” the more so since FDR knew it was coming and did all he could to provoke it by cutting Japan off from oil supplies, directly provoking it into launching the attack. But Hawaii is the periphery while 9/11 struck at the heart of the empire, the financial center in New York that drives the imperial wealth pump, and the Pentagon, which is charged with the mission of US world domination. 

Whether you believe that 19 Arabs armed with box cutters who couldn’t fly propeller planes took down 3 World Trade buildings that plummeted straight down at the speed of freefall in what looked like controlled demolition (yes there were 3, look up “Building 7”), and destroyed a section of the Pentagon, or whether you believe it was an inside job, doesn’t matter. The point is, in that act of destruction, the wars of the empire finally came home. 

What was the result? Did these events cause us to reconsider what we are doing? Of course not! Instead, we went all-in for war. Remember, the empire is an automaton, a self-perpetuating organism, living on money and fear. What better way to whip up fear than to stage, or to allow, or to simply fail to prevent, an attack on the “homeland”—which is, by the way, a Nazi propaganda term. The purpose of war is simply to cause more war, since it is so profitable for the badly misnamed “defense industry.” Butler told us in 1933 that “war is a racket,” and documented massive war profiteering during WWI. Do you know how much money Lockheed, Northrop-Grumman, Boeing, General Dynamics, Raytheon et al. are making from the “War on Terror”? The sums are astronomical.

As you read these words, the empire is busy doing its work in Ukraine. Here is how that works. First, it overthrows the elected government in a US-backed coup. Next, it directs its local puppet regime to unleash a military attack and organize death squads to deal with the population in the east that won't go along with the US-backed coup, in this case using actual Nazi-branded death squads, complete with Nazi SS Insignias. (Anyone can verify these facts with the most cursory internet search.) And for the final, consummate imperialist touch, it votes in the UN (together with Canada) against a resolution condemning the Ukrainian Nazis and other racist murderers, while the Europeans shamefacedly abstain. This sort of plan used to work really well, and so the empire keeps repeating it over and over again, even though the results are worse every time.

Vast numbers of Americans support the empire’s wars of conquest because they help maintain their lavish lifestyles. They bother some of us more than others. Many of us are adamantly against them, but only a few find it emotionally unbearable to countenance the destruction of millions of lives in our names and with our money. What makes them different? Who knows, you would have to ask a psychologist. 

The question for those who oppose endless war is, What have we done about it? A mass movement in the 1960’s that added up to an uprising by a vast segment of society perhaps had something to do with ending the conflict in Vietnam. In spite of these protests, the empire was able to extend the war by an extra five years all the way to 1973, when it agreed to end it on the same terms that had been offered in 1968 to Nobel “peace laureate” Henry Kissinger. There has been no significant anti-war protest since then, and certainly none that succeeded in preventing or ending war. Why? 

First, the draft was ended. This put an end to the involvement of average US families in the wars of empire, and therefore ending the requirement for consent of the governed. The strategists realized that the draft was a disaster for the empire. The new, much better and cheaper way to procure cannon fodder for the endless war is to enlist the children of the underclass, by using economic oppression in order to deprive them of any other means of advancement except military service. 

Second, the military has been outsourced and privatized, requiring even less involvement by US families in the military, and less need for their consent. “You’re all volunteers, so shut up” is the attitude. 

Third, the vastly increased scope of domestic spying by the NSA and other government agencies has helped keep everyone under control and stifle dissent. 

Fourth is the tight government/corporate control of the US media, which has become consummately successful in brainwashing and propagandizing the population. 

Finally, there is the war on whistleblowers and journalists who expose the truth, from Tom Drake to William Binney, Sibel Simons, Jesselyn Radack, Bradley Manning and Julian Assange. If necessary, the police, who are vastly more militarized than in the past, together with national guard troops, can squash any dissent like a bug. All these measures ensure that efforts at reform pursued through legal, nonviolent means such as voting, protest, civil disobedience, civil resistance, etc. will have absolutely no effect. The only action that can possibly stop the empire in its tracks is cutting off its food supply—the tax money on which it lives. We have to starve the beast through divestment, capital expatriation, tax resistance, tax refusal and tax revolt. Former Secretary of State Alexander Haig told us this flat out in the 1980’s when, being confronted with huge protests over US Central American policy, he said: “Let them protest all they want as long as they pay their taxes.” Truer words were never uttered by a US official. Is there any evidence to contradict his statement? Has any other measure had any impact on the war machine? The honest answer is no. Millions of people around the world protested before the 2003 invasion of Iraq. These protests were ignored. No amount of protest or other efforts can stop it, because it doesn’t cut off the empire’s food supply of money and fear. Only by cutting off its funds by not paying taxes can we stop the empire. 

Many have said that the US doesn’t need tax money as it survives on endless debt. Yes, the empire lives on debt, but the ability to sell debt is based on the bond rating of US treasury bonds. Most recently in June, 2014 S&P gave the US a AA+ rating with “stable outlook.”

If there is any doubt about the US credit rating, the ability to sell debt to continue financing the empire comes into question. The ability to collect taxes is what maintains the US bond rating. Any reduction of the US bond rating, and interest rates have to go up in order to continue attracting more investment. Then the interest on the debt balloons out of control and becomes unrepayable—never mind the principal, which they have no intention of ever paying back. By the way, the Tea Party’s efforts to shut down government by refusing to raise the debt ceiling was helping this effort for a time, although for different reasons. They thought that the welfare system is bankrupting the country. This is a laughable claim, because welfare spending looks negligible when compared to military spending. Still, they did manage to lower the bond rating for a time. Shutting down the federal government is a step in the right direction, and since in recent years only the Tea Party has managed to do it, lets give them some credit 

If the US became unable to reliably collect taxes, then its ability to finance the empire with debt would be diminished, and the US would have to turn to increasing taxes—another politically unpalatable choice, especially in the age of the Tea Party, when the empire’s main constituency is dead-set against more taxes.
So it is absolutely clear that the only thing that could stop the empire is a tax revolt. It wouldn’t even have to be that big; the slightest question about the ability of the federal government to collect taxes could reduce the bond rating. Even a minor reduction could raise interest rates enough to make the US debt unrepayable. 

Let's get down to brass tacks: How do you avoid paying taxes, when the IRS withholds our salaries, and the tables are rigged to withhold about 15% more than necessary on average, so 80% of people get a refund? Did you think that this is a coincidence? No, this is a one-year interest-free loan to the empire from taxpayers. But it’s actually quite simple not to pay taxes. Get a W-4 form, write EXEMPT in the space provided, and turn it in to your friendly HR office. Your employer is not allowed to change it unless directed by the IRS. Normally they have no reason to question it. 

Here’s what happened last time it was tried on a big scale. In 2007, Code Pink joined the War Resisters League to organize a national project for war tax refusal, to “Stop Bush’s Wars.” This was not a true tax revolt, just more or less a referendum on how many people would potentially support withholding a portion of their taxes owed, even a token amount. The online petition asked people if they would be willing to commit to withhold some of their taxes, even $1, if 100,000 other people would agree to do the same. Out of the US population of 316 million, how many people do you think signed it? About 2,000. So you see, there is not much evidence that people will do the only thing that could stop the empire: a true Tea Party tax revolt. 

What this implies is that the empire will continue to churn along, and debt will continue to build up, because any other approach to paying for it is not feasible, and therefore collapse is inevitable. The aftermath of collapse is unpredictable; maybe there will be a soft landing, maybe not. But unless you are willing to engage in some form of tax revolt, collapse is inevitable. You will get to live with the results: stage a tax revolt now, or face collapse later. 

Are you sure you want to take your chances on collapse? The results of a personal tax revolt are predictable: retribution with penalties and interest from the IRS; living in fear of having your salary, your property, even your house seized, or worse, your door broken down by federal agents (although these extreme measures don’t happen too often, they happen often enough to instill fear). Perhaps there would be loss of income, or even your job. Losing one’s job often leads to depression, divorce, drug or alcohol abuse, etc. So you may prefer collapse after all: loss of your savings, no heat, electricity or trash removal, shops looted or closed, armed gangs roaming the streets... Your choice! 

On the other hand, collapse might go well! Hope springs eternal in the optimistic American heart. We are (or used to be) the “can-do” people. Maybe we can-do collapse better than anyone else? Doubtful though if you read Dmitry Orlov’s Collapse Gap presentation.

The results of collapse later are likely to be worse then the effects of tax revolt now. Especially, since the IRS takes years to catch up to exempt W-4 forms, and it would be even harder to crack down if it were being was done en masse. But it’s perfectly understandable if you opt to do nothing now and suffer no consequences, while engaging in ineffective protest to assuage your conscience. You probably have a family to support, an expensive hobby, or some other excuse. So you decide to take your chances with collapse later. After all, collapse might turn out OK for you! This psychology is quite understandable. I truly hope that collapse will be as painless as you wish it will be, but somehow I doubt it. Good luck though! Whatever happens, you will have to live with your decision for the rest of your life—be it long or short. 
 
Signed, expat and long-time conscientious tax refuser, Gary Flomenhoft.

6 MILLION MORE LIES, DECEPTIONS, OUTRAGES, MASS MURDERS, PLUNDERS, PERVERSIONS, AND 'VAIN' HOPES!

0
0
6 MILLION MORE LIES, DECEPTIONS, OUTRAGES, MASS MURDERS, PLUNDERS, PERVERSIONS, AND 'VAIN' HOPES!



 The True Face of Islam seen byMélanie DIAM a former French RAPPER (RAP is of US Jewish origins and exported to France by Jews!) saved by Islam from Jewish psychiatry, drugs and suicide!

 Diam's Une Autre Vie



  


 (Diam's) Mélanie Georgiades "Le vrai visage de l'Islam"



 Diam's - I Am Somebody 

  

Diam's Ecorchée Vive


    
Islam in USA: American Rap Singer Revert to Islam
<a href="/channel/UCugxvkDlTFjy6DhIIZwCwCg" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-name="" data-ytid="UCugxvkDlTFjy6DhIIZwCwCg" data-sessionlink="ei=yVmlVPmFGNWFc4vfgNgL">TheReligiousLecture</a>

 


Deceived by one of his many sex partners who once "had him""Pacifist Peace and Love" John Lennon (Beatles) burned down her flat in his song "Norwegian Wood"out of revenge and while she was at work!

 
We are permanently deceived on a daily basis by "our own" Corporate governments, but we have been brainwashed to be forever peaceful and loving pacifists!  The days of freedom, truth and justice are far far away and are not likely!

 

Kevin Barrett's radio show schedule

Wednesday, December 31, 2014

Top False Flag stories of 2014?



As co-hosts of False Flag Weekly News, Jim Fetzer and I reported more than 1,000 stories in 2014. 

But which ones were the biggest stories of the year?

Below are my nominations. But I'm sure I'm leaving some out - so either leave a comment here, or email me at kbarrett[at]merr[dot]com with your suggestions. Best suggestion wins a free book:

Nominees for Top False Flag Stories of 2014


Malaysian tribunal finds Israel guilty of genocide, three Malaysian planes fall from the sky


Anti-Russia false flag ops start new Cold War


Gordon Duff solves 9/11 nuclear demolition

False flag "jihadi" group ISIS establishes phony caliphate

False flag Ebola scare fizzles


Israeli false flags and 2014 Gaza genocide

Protests target killer cops: False flag race war looming?

Ottawa shootings: Canada's 9/11 inside job?



Fukushima radiation threatens life on earth


War on Iran off the table, nuclear deal progresses

Obama actually does a couple of good things (net neutrality, Cuba)

Israel admits USS Liberty attack was deliberate

World recognizing Palestinian statehood

New research shows JFK limo stopped for up to 30 seconds, allowing kill shot

Zionist billionaires Sabanand Adelson plan to buy presidency in 2016

CIA fails to kill or overthrow Maduro, Roussef


Congress moves toward declassifying 28 pages of 9/11 report

Richard Gage of AE911Truth broadcasts nationwide on C-Span



TERRORIST STATES OF BRITAIN, US-ISRAEL AND FRANCE

French Journalist (Jewish Libération) and colleague interviewing ANJEM CHOUDARY aBOGUS Muslim (MI5, MI6, Scotland Yard recruit!!!) , Thursday 11th of August 2006– Photos B.A.F.SCopyright

APOCALYPSE 10 - TOTALITARIAN FASCIST BRITAIN AT WAR AGAIN WITH ISLAM AND MUSLIMS


British Terrorism in the UK: The 4th Bomb - FREE MOVIE 

See: Anthony Hill's (Muad'Dib's) latest film 7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT 2 about the July 7 2005 London bombings.

Read "TERROR ON THE TUBE" by Pr Nicholas Kollerstrom. 

ISIS is ISRAEL SECRET INTELLIGENCE SERVICEand is CIA-MOSSAD-MI6 manufactured!  

The controversial terrorist organisation, Islamic State (IS) is a creation of the United States, said former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.


LIFESTYLE OF THE EXTREMELY RICH - PAEDOPHILIA, HOMOSEXUALITY, PROSTITUTION, HUMAN SACRIFICE, RAPE, GAMBLING, DRUGS...

0
0

 'Met three times': Prince Andrew with 17-year-old Virginia Roberts, centre, and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2001

Prince Andrew 'lobbied the US government to go easy on Jeffrey Epstein': Palace denies claims royal tried to use his influence to help billionaire paedophile during 2008 police probe 

  • Jeffrey Epstein was jailed for soliciting girls for underage prostitution 
  • Woman said she was 'forced' to have sex with Prince Andrew at parties 
  • Her lawyers claim he lobbied US government against Epstein's prosecution
  • Alan Dershowitz, also named in paper, claims they are 'made-up stories' 
  • The royal issued a strong denial of ALL the 'categorically untrue' claims 
  • Alleged victim hit back by saying she would not be 'bullied into silence'
  • 'She was told to give the prince whatever he demanded by Epstein'
A Buckingham Palace spokesman has denied claims Prince Andrew lobbied the US government against the prosecution of his long-term friend Jeffrey Epstein - the US billionaire paedophile.
The allegation comes as court papers emerged which also sensationally claim the royal abused an underage girl at an orgy where she was being used as a 'sex slave'.
Epstein was one of the best-connected men in America until he was jailed for 13 months in 2008 for soliciting girls for underage prostitution.

Scroll down for video 
 'Met three times': Prince Andrew with 17-year-old Virginia Roberts, centre, and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2001

'Met three times': Prince Andrew with 17-year-old Virginia Roberts, centre, and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2001

The prince stayed friends with him despite his conviction and they were seen together in 2011 after Epstein’s release from jail.
Documents claim the prince tried to use his influence to help Epstein during the police probe and demands the American government be ordered by the court to hand over correspondence.
The women’s lawyers say it will show Prince Andrew and Harvard Law School expert Alan Dershowitz lobbied against Epstein being prosecuted.
The order they want the court to grant are ‘documents regarding Epstein’s lobbying efforts to persuade the Government to give him a more favorable plea arrangement and/or non-prosecution agreement, including efforts on his behalf by Prince Andrew and former Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz’.  
Last night the prince issued a strongly-worded denial, with Buckingham Palace saying ‘any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue’. 
The spokesman said that the statement also applied to the allegation that Prince Andrew lobbied the US government.  
But his alleged victim immediately hit back by saying she would not be ‘bullied into silence by aggressive attacks’.
While Dershowitz today said all the claims against him were part of a pattern of 'made-up stories' by the woman against prominent people.
He said that he would not rest until he had shown that the claims regarding his conduct were false and he advised the Duke to do everything in his power to clear his name.
'My only feeling is, if she's lied about me, which I know to an absolute certainty she has, she should not be believed about anyone else,' he told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.
'We know she's lied about other public figures including a former prime minister and others who she claims to have participated in sexual activities with, so I think it must be presumed all her allegations against Prince Andrew were false as well.
'You cannot allow these allegations to hang above you. The first question you have to ask yourself when you are charged with a crime like this is "Is there any conceivable possibility you did it?" and if the answer to that is "no", you have to fight back with every resource and ounce of energy available to you. 
The woman – named only as Jane Doe #3 but said to be 30-year-old Virginia Roberts – says in court documents she was told to ‘give the prince whatever he demanded’ by Epstein.

Part of the court document filed, pictured above, demanding the American government be ordered by the federal court to hand over correspondence which the women’s lawyers claim will show Prince Andrew and Dershowitz lobbied against Epstein being prosecuted
Part of the court document filed, pictured above, demanding the American government be ordered by the federal court to hand over correspondence which the women’s lawyers claim will show Prince Andrew and Dershowitz lobbied against Epstein being prosecuted

She claimed she and other underage girls were ‘procured for sexual activities’ by Ghislaine Maxwell, the socialite daughter of crooked tycoon Robert Maxwell.
Miss Maxwell is alleged to have facilitated the prince’s ‘abuse’ of the girl, after helping Epstein to convert her ‘into what is commonly referred to as a sex slave’.
Miss Maxwell is described as a madam and ‘a primary co-conspirator in [Epstein’s] sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme’.
A spokesperson for Miss Maxwell has reportedly strongly denied the allegations, and she has previously made clear that Epstein's crimes were committed long before she had dealings with him.  
Legal documents lodged with a court in Florida name Andrew, 54, as one of three men allegedly involved in abusing the woman 13 years ago when she was 17 – which is underage in Florida state law.
The bombshell papers state: ‘One such powerful individual Epstein forced [her] to have sexual relations with was a member of the British Royal Family, Prince Andrew, aka Duke of York.’ 

WHY HAS PRINCE ANDREW BEEN LINKED TO THE CASE? THE HISTORY BEHIND THE LEGAL MOTION

The Duke of York has been named in a document handed to the Florida court this week in connection with an ongoing lawsuit by two other women who claim they were abused by Epstein.
The multi-millionaire was convicted of sex offences in 2008 after a plea deal which saw him serve 13 months of an 18 month prison sentence.
But two women who say they were abused by him, known as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, said their rights have been violated because they were not consulted before the deal was done and they began suing U.S. prosecutors over their handling of the case six years ago.
Today it was revealed that Jane Doe 3, who has named Prince Andrew, and another woman named as Jane Doe 4, say they have been violated in the same way and want to join the group action.
The claim names three locations, saying one involved an orgy with numerous underaged girls. It alleges: ‘Epstein instructed Jane Doe #3 that she was to give the prince whatever he demanded and required Jane Doe #3 to report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse.’ 
Last night a Buckingham Palace spokesman said: ‘This relates to long-standing and ongoing civil proceedings in the United States, to which the Duke of York is not a party. As such we would not comment on the detail.
‘However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue.’ Until now Buckingham Palace has refused to comment on stories around the case, but last night lawyers for the prince advised his private office to release a statement, given the high-profile nature of the latest legal salvo, which made headlines around the world.
His accuser countered with a statement issued through her lawyers that said: ‘I am looking forward to vindicating my rights as an innocent victim and pursuing all available recourse. It appears that I am now being unjustly victimised again.
‘These types of aggressive attacks on me are exactly the reason why sexual abuse victims typically remain silent and the reason why I did for a long time. That trend should change. I’m not going to be bullied back into silence.’
Although she was not named in court documents, she was being linked in America to Miss Roberts, who as a teenager was photographed standing next to Andrew.
Jane Doe #3 has made similar allegations against Harvard Law School expert Alan Dershowitz and a French model scout.
Professor Dershowitz, who represented Epstein in the 2008 case, said today: 'The story is totally made up. I don't know this woman, It is part of a pattern of made-up stories against prominent people and world leaders.

Prince Andrew pictured in 2011 with multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein, who is at the centre of the new  case
Prince Andrew pictured in 2011 with multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein, who is at the centre of the new case

'I want to see this played out not only in the court of public opinion but in the court of law. I will prove beyond any doubt not only that the story is totally false but it was knowingly false. 
'I will swear under oath - and I challenge them to swear under oath - that it did not happen.
'I will not rest or stop until the world understands not only that I had nothing to do with any of this but that she deliberately made up this story wilfully and knowingly.'
He acknowledged that he had met Andrew on a number of occasions - including at a birthday party for Lord Rothschild which was also attended by Epstein - but said they had never been alone together and that he was not a witness to any impropriety.
'I have never been alone with Prince Andrew, I have never been at a party with any women with Prince Andrew and I am certainly not a witness or participant in any sexual activities whatsoever,' he said.
Epstein was suspected nearly a decade ago of paying for sex with dozens of underage girls. The FBI ultimately dropped its investigation and, in a ‘plea bargain’, he admitted a single offence and served 13 months of an 18-month jail sentence.
The documents, filed at West Palm Beach Federal Courthouse in Florida, are part of an ongoing civil dispute between Epstein and four of his alleged victims. The latest issue refers to his plea-bargain which two unnamed victims, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, say prosecutors should not have agreed.
Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4 have joined their legal action. Epstein’s lawyer, Jack Goldberger, said the allegations were ‘old and salacious and ‘been consistently proven to have no merit’.
While Miss Maxwell branded all claims against her as 'untrue' and 'obvious lies' after she was reportedly named in the US court papers by the woman.
She has previously denied any wrongdoing and said in 2011 she would take legal action over some of the reporting of the story.
Her spokesman said: 'The allegations made ... against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue.
'The original allegations are not new and have been fully responded to and shown to be untrue.
'Each time the story is retold it changes, with new salacious details about public figures and world leaders.
'(The woman's) claims are obvious lies and should be treated as such and not publicised as news, as they are defamatory. Ghislaine Maxwell's original response to the lies and defamatory claims remains the same.
'Miss Maxwell strongly denies allegations of an unsavoury nature, which have appeared in the British press and elsewhere and reserves her right to seek redress at the repetition of such old defamatory claims.'

DID 'JANE DOE #3' ALSO SLEEP WITH A PRIME MINISTER?  

By Christian Gysin for the Daily Mail 
Epstein, pictured, had an impressive array of contacts in his 'black book' of phone numbers, including former US President Bill Clinton
Epstein, pictured, had an impressive array of contacts in his 'black book' of phone numbers, including former US President Bill Clinton

As well as explosive allegations about Prince Andrew, ‘Jane Doe #3’ told the court she was ‘trafficked for sexual purposes’ to a string of other powerful men – including ‘a well-known Prime Minister’.
No clue was given to the identity, but the court documents say Epstein’s ‘lending’ of young girls to prominent international figures – foreign presidents and US politicians and businessmen among them – was to ‘ingratiate’ himself and ‘so that he could potentially blackmail them’.
From his 97-page ‘black book’ of phone numbers and email addresses, it is clear Epstein had an impressive array of contacts.
When its contents were disclosed three years ago, the book was shown to include contact details for former US President Bill Clinton, ex-secretary of state Henry Kissinger, and Barbara Walters, then one of America’s most influential broadcasters.
Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson’s details are there, along with entrepreneur Donald Trump, members of the Kennedy family and former prime minister Tony Blair. There is also an entry for Mr Blair’s former spin doctor Alastair Campbell – but with a Downing Street number, not his personal mobile phone.
Formula One’s Bernie Ecclestone, Eddie Irvine, Jacques Villeneuve and Flavio Briatore are listed – by numbers relating to their ‘boat/plane’.
It has previously been reported that at varying times President Clinton, Prince Andrew, former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, New Mexico’s ex-governor Bill Richardson and the former US treasury secretary Larry Summers had all been passengers on Epstein’s fleet of private jets.
However, there is no suggestion from Jane Doe #3 that she was involved with any of the people named above.
In reference to the services offered by Epstein, court papers suggest, there are entries for masseuses including one for ‘Sonya (speak little English)’ and ‘Tanya (speaks NO English’).
Teenager claims she was picked to provide erotic services for Epstein and friends 
By David Williams, Chief Reporter for the Daily Mail 
The anonymous woman who yesterday made sensational sex claims about Prince Andrew was identified in court papers only as Jane Doe #3.
But sources in the US last night linked her allegations to an account given by blonde mother-of-three Virginia Roberts five years ago. Miss Roberts made a series of sensational claims which drew Prince Andrew into the heart of the scandal over paedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.
Jane Doe #3 claims she ‘was forced to have sexual relations’ with the prince when she was under the age of consent.
Miss Roberts’s story – which is chronicled both in legal documents and in a detailed newspaper interview – offers a fascinating, often chilling insight into Epstein’s debauchery. She claimed the shamed American tycoon introduced her to the jetset world of the powerful, the fabulously rich and the famous – from the Duke of York to former US President Bill Clinton, former Vice-President Al Gore, Oscar-winning actor Kevin Spacey, Donald Trump and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak.

Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were among guests on this pheasant shoot, attended by Andrew (right), at Sandringham, Norfolk, after the Prince and the US businessman became friends
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were among guests on this pheasant shoot, attended by Andrew (right), at Sandringham, Norfolk, after the Prince and the US businessman became friends

It was also a sordid world of abuse where she is said to have been treated as a ‘sex slave’, passed around at the behest of Epstein and first abused as a minor. Epstein is also accused in the court papers of loaning out girls so he could later blackmail their abusers. A settlement was reached by Miss Roberts with Epstein five years ago, but some of the claims in the new documents lodged in the Florida courts mirror those of the earlier case.
Miss Roberts had claimed she had not only been abused by Epstein but had jetted around the world with him and was ‘sexually exploited by [his] adult male peers, including royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen and/or professional and personal acquaintances’.
Now 30 and living in California, Miss Roberts was 15 and working as a changing room assistant at a club in Palm Beach, Florida, owned by Mr Trump, when she met Epstein.

KEY ALLEGATIONS: WHAT CLAIMS ARE MADE BY TWO JANE DOES

 - Jeffrey Epstein forced Jane Doe 3 to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew between 1999 and 2002.
 - The girl had sex with the Prince when she 17, which is considered underage in Florida
 - They met for sex in London, New York and on Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands
 - On the final occasion Prince Andrew had sex with her in an 'orgy with numerous other under-aged girls'
 - She was told by the Epstein 'to give the Prince whatever he demanded and report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse'
 - Robert Maxwell's youngest daughter Ghislaine acted as a 'madame' for the girl and allowed Prince Andrew to have sex with her in her London home, documents claim
- In 2002, Jane Doe 4, described at the time as a 'poor and vulnerable 16-year-old' alleges she was told that she could make $300 by 'giving an old man a massage' in Florida
- Epstein subsequently committed 'sexual acts against Jane Doe 4 on many occasions', according to court documents
Epstein’s close friend Ghislaine Maxwell, the glamorous and well-connected daughter of disgraced tycoon Robert Maxwell, allegedly approached the pretty, blue-eyed teenager and offered her the chance to work for a wealthy ‘gentleman’ who needed a travelling masseuse.
They visited Epstein’s mansion nearby where she was said to have been ordered to strip and straddle his naked body. ‘My face was red with embarrassment but I felt under immense pressure to please them,’ she said.
‘The whole time it was going on, they were promising me the world, that I’d travel with Jeffrey on his private jet and have a well-paid profession.’
Epstein paid her $200 for what he called the ‘erotic massage’ and told her to return the next day.
She spent the next four years with Epstein. For three of those years, she was under Florida’s age of consent – 18.
‘Basically, I was training to be a prostitute for him and his friends who shared his interest in young girls,’ she says.
That stage of his alleged abuse started after two years when he asked Miss Roberts to fly to his Caribbean island and make a friend of his ‘feel how you make me feel’.
She says she was given to men, aged from their 40s to their 60s, either on the island or on Epstein’s New Mexico ranch. In interviews with The Mail on Sunday after the settlement of the original legal action, Miss Roberts claims she met Prince Andrew three times.
She claims she accompanied Epstein on a six-week trip to Europe and North Africa in 2001, and they went to Miss Maxwell’s London house.
The following day, Andrew arrived and Miss Maxwell served tea and biscuits to the four of them.
It is alleged Miss Maxwell invited the prince to guess Virginia’s age and he correctly said ‘17’, at which Miss Maxwell joked that Jeffrey would ‘soon have to trade her in’.
After dinner and a trip to Tramp nightclub, where she danced with the prince, they returned to Miss Maxwell’s house. They all went upstairs and Virginia asked Epstein to take a picture of her with Andrew to ‘show my mom’. She adds: ‘Ghislaine and Jeffrey left us after that, and later Andrew left.’
The following morning, Miss Maxwell allegedly told her: ‘You did well. He had fun.’ At the time of that interview, there were no claims that the prince had been involved with Miss Roberts.
She says she met Andrew a second time at Easter 2001, finding him sitting in a leather armchair at Epstein’s Manhattan home.

A picture of Jeffrey Epstein's apartment in New York, where Prince Andrew is said to have stayed
A picture of Jeffrey Epstein's apartment in New York, where Prince Andrew is said to have stayed

Her final encounter with the prince was on Epstein’s Caribbean island, by which time she was 18.
Miss Roberts also told of meetings Mr Clinton but says she was never ‘lent out’ to him.
She said: ‘I only ever met Bill twice but Jeffrey had told me that they were good friends.
‘I asked, “How come?” and he laughed and said, “He owes me some favours.” Maybe he was just joking but it constantly surprised me that people with as much to lose as Bill and [Prince] Andrew weren’t more careful.’
On one occasion, Miss Roberts claimed, Epstein invited two young brunettes to a dinner which he gave on his Caribbean island for Mr Clinton shortly after he left office. But, as far as she knows, the ex-President did not take the bait.

Miss Roberts claims that she met the Prince at the London home of Ghislaine Maxwell, pictured
Miss Roberts claims that she met the Prince at the London home of Ghislaine Maxwell, pictured

‘I’d have been about 17 at the time,’ she says. ‘I flew to the Caribbean with Jeffrey and then Ghislaine Maxwell went to pick up Bill in a huge black helicopter that Jeffrey had bought her. Bill must have known about Jeffrey’s girls. There were three desks in the living area of the villa on the island.
‘They were covered with pictures of Jeffrey shaking hands with famous people and photos of naked girls, including one of me that Jeffrey had at all his houses, lying in a hammock.
‘We all dined together that night. Jeffrey was at the head of the table. Bill was at his left. I sat across from him. Ghislaine was at Bill’s left and at the left of Ghislaine there were two olive-skinned brunettes who’d flown in with us from New York.
‘I’d never met them before. I’d say they were no older than 17, very innocent-looking.
‘They weren’t there for me. They weren’t there for Jeffrey or Ghislaine because I was there to have sex with Jeffrey on the trip. Maybe Jeffrey thought they would entertain Bill, but I saw no evidence that he was interested in them. He and Jeffrey and Ghislaine seemed to have a very good relationship. Bill was very funny.
‘After dinner I gave Jeffrey an erotic massage. I don’t remember seeing Bill again on the trip but I assume Ghislaine flew him back.’
Speaking to The Mail on Sunday, Miss Roberts also remembered meeting Naomi Campbell at a birthday party on a yacht in the South of France. ‘She is a friend of Ghislaine’s but she was a real bitch to me,’ she said.
Within a few months, she recalled, Epstein was hinting she was ‘too old’ for him although he and Miss Maxwell once disgusted her, she claimed, by suggesting she had a child by him. ‘They said I would have to sign a contract relinquishing rights to the child and consenting to Jeffrey having as many relationships as he liked,’ she says. ‘It was a smack in the face.’
For her 19th birthday, Epstein flew Miss Roberts to Thailand to take a massage course. She met an Australian martial arts expert there and married him ten days later.
She had three children and lived in Australia but last night she was said to living in her home state of California – she had run away from home as an 11 year-old.
After his arrest in 2008, Epstein was jailed for 18 months on two charges of soliciting a minor for sex. He was released after 13 months and placed on the sex offender register for life. He mostly lives at his home on the Virgin Islands.
Lawyers for the women, including Jane Doe #3, are seeking a motion to expose a secret deal Epstein struck with prosecutors to avoid a lengthy sentence and a charge of statutory rape.
Miss Maxwell could not be reached for comment last night, but lawyers acting on her behalf have previously told the Mail that Epstein’s crimes were committed long after their client ceased to have dealings with him.

ALLEGATIONS OF SEX IN LONDON, NEW YORK AND THE CARIBBEAN 

The claim filed at Florida district court in West Palm Beach by the woman known as Jane Doe #3 includes allegations that:  
‘Epstein sexually trafficked the then-minor Jane Doe, making her available for sex to politically-connected and financially-powerful people.
‘Epstein’s purposes ... were to ingratiate himself with them for business, personal, political and financial gain, as well as to obtain potential blackmail information.

Virgin Islands: The girl claims she was made to have sex with Prince Andrew in Epstein's villa, pictured
Virgin Islands: The girl claims she was made to have sex with Prince Andrew in Epstein's villa, pictured

‘One such powerful individual Epstein forced [alleged victim] Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was a member of the British royal family, Prince Andrew, aka Duke of York.
‘Jane Doe #3 was forced to have sexual relations with this prince when she was a minor in three separate geographical locations: in London (at Ghislaine Maxwell’s apartment), in New York and on Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands (in an orgy with numerous underaged girls.)
‘Epstein instructed Jane Doe #3 that she was to give the prince whatever he demanded and required Jane Doe #3 to report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse.
‘Maxwell facilitated Prince Andrew’s acts of sexual abuse by acting as a ‘madame’ for Epstein, thereby assisting in internationally trafficking Jane Doe #3 (and numerous other girls) for sexual purposes.
‘Epstein also trafficked Jane Doe #3 for sexual purposes to many other powerful men, including numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well known prime minister, and other world leaders.
‘Epstein required Jane Doe #3 to describe the events that she had with these men so that he could potentially blackmail them. Maxwell was another person in Epstein’s inner circle and co-conspirator in Epstein’s sexual abuse.
‘In addition to participating in the sexual abuse of Jane Doe #3 and others, Maxwell also took numerous sexually explicit pictures of underage girls involved in sexual activities.
‘Maxwell herself regularly participated in Epstein’s sexual exploitation of minors, including Jane Doe #3.
‘Maxwell persuaded Jane Doe #3 (who was then 15 years old) to come to Epstein’s mansion in a fashion very similar to the manner in which Epstein and his other co-conspirators coerced dozens of other children.
‘Epstein kept Jane Doe #3 as his sex slave from about 1999 through 2002, when she managed to escape to a foreign country and hide out from Epstein and his co-conspirators for years.’
The Prince and the paedophile: How Andrew enjoyed sensual massages at sex offender friend's Florida mansion... and Duke invited him into the heart of the Royal Family 
By Sam Greenhill for the Daily Mail 
Jailed as a paedophile, Jeffrey Epstein found many of his wealthy friends quietly melted away.
But there was one long-standing associate on whose loyalty he could rely – Prince Andrew.
The pair had been chummy for years, and not even Epstein’s conviction for abusing underage girls appeared to dent their bond. Three years after Epstein’s downfall in 2008, the friends were photographed strolling together in New York’s Central Park.
It caused acute embarrassment and cost the prince his job representing Britain as a trade envoy. Even his staunchest defenders at Buckingham Palace ‘had their heads in their hands’, according to an informed source. ‘This is just indefensible. There is nothing we can do,’ one courtier said.
But Andrew has always done pretty much as he likes, especially if it involves partying with beautiful women. In this, his super-rich playboy friend was something of a kindred spirit. Neither is married – Epstein has never wed – and the two powerful men partied together all over the world.

Revellers including Epstein's personal assistant Miss Marcinkova (left) and Miss Kellen (second from right)
Revellers including Epstein's personal assistant Miss Marcinkova (left) and Miss Kellen (second from right)

The Duke of York holidayed and had daily massages at the £4million Florida mansion where Epstein abused teenage girls, legal papers claimed in 2011. Andrew is said to have enjoyed regular rub-downs at the whitewashed Palm Beach residence where winged gargoyles flanked the gate and masseuses worked for £60 an hour. Photographs of naked women adorned the walls.
In return, Epstein seemed to enjoy extraordinary access to the heart of the Royal Family, courtesy of Andrew, and has been a guest of the Queen at Balmoral, Windsor Castle and Sandringham.
Sarah Ferguson was also a visitor to Epstein’s Florida mansion, and he even helped her to clear her debts. She accepted £15,000 from him in a grubby deal she later admitted was a ‘gigantic error of judgment’.Epstein and Andrew met in the 1990s, introduced by the financier’s then girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, the glamorous daughter of disgraced tycoon Robert Maxwell.
She and Epstein became a couple shortly after the newspaper publisher’s 1991 death when Miss Maxwell moved to New York and – bankrolled by him – established herself as a leading Manhattan socialite.
She repaid the favour by putting Epstein in touch with her own well-heeled friends in Britain, including Andrew. According to friends, this first meeting probably took place during a holiday at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, owned by Donald Trump. 
In 2000, Epstein was an honoured guest at a June engagement at Windsor Castle to celebrate the Queen’s birthday.
Six months later, he was invited to a party at Sandringham which the prince had arranged to celebrate Miss Maxwell’s 39th birthday. In between, she took Epstein to a ‘hookers and pimps’ party at a New York nightclub hosted by former lingerie model Heidi Klum in a black latex S&M outfit.

Ghislaine Maxwell (pictured with Jeffrrey Epstein) kept a laundry basket full of sex toys in a cupboard at Epstein's 'House of Sin', it was claimed
Ghislaine Maxwell (pictured with Jeffrrey Epstein) kept a laundry basket full of sex toys in a cupboard at Epstein's 'House of Sin', it was claimed

Andrew was also at a Manhattan cocktail party thrown that year by Miss Maxwell which was filled with young Russian ‘models’ – leaving some of the other guests ‘horrified’, court papers indicated.
Epstein was first arrested in 2005, after the stepmother of a 14-year-old girl told Florida police that he had paid the youngster $200 (£120) for an ‘erotic massage’.
An FBI investigation uncovered a string of vulnerable teenagers who claimed he kept them as a harem at his luxury homes.
He allegedly staged orgies on private jets and flew girls as young as 12 to ‘topless parties’ at his Florida mansion, dubbed the ‘House of Sin’. By 2008, the FBI believed it had identified 20 women who might level sexual allegations against him in court.
Epstein struck a ‘plea bargain’ with prosecutors that saw him confess to two relatively minor charges related to child prostitution with the rest of the case dropped. He received an 18-month jail sentence.
More sordid secrets of Epstein’s ‘House of Sin’ then began to emerge – including Andrew’s penchant for massages. The billionaire’s long-standing handyman and cleaner Juan Alessi said, in court papers seen by the Mail, that he set up massage tables for Andrew on a daily basis. Speaking under oath to solicitors in 2009, he said pictures of naked women were on display by the pool, while other witnesses described nude photographs of underage girls adorning a stairway.
He said Miss Maxwell kept a laundry basket full of sex toys in a cupboard at the house, alongside a shiny black costume. Mr Alessi added that the five-bedroom home ‘was run like a hotel’ with a host of celebrity guests passing through. Among them was Andrew, who stayed in the blue guest room where there was apparently soap in the shape of male and female genitalia.
Mr Alessi said: ‘I saw guests at the house that were celebrities ... It was Prince Andrew. It was Princess Sarah.’ He later clarified that he meant the Duchess of York. Asked whether the pair ever had massages, Mr Alessi said: ‘Prince Andrew did.’ At least 40 girls later came forward, some saying Epstein sexually assaulted them during massages. One sordid allegation was that for his birthday one year, he was presented with three 12-year-old girls from France for his sexual pleasure.
Epstein’s personal assistant Sarah Kellen, 35, is said to have arranged for a string of underage girls to visit his mansion and would pay them around £150 a visit. She prepared massage tables and oils that the girls were to use for their ‘work’. A former girlfriend of the billionaire financier, model Nadia Marcinkova, took part in threesomes with him, court documents said. Both women refused to comment when questioned by lawyers.
Until now, it has always been reported that there was no evidence Andrew was aware that his host was paying children for sex.
Indeed, the Daily Mail has previously stressed that none of the claims about the prince has been corroborated, and that they have yet to be tested in a court of law.But some Buckingham Palace courtiers were in despair yesterday that the Royal Family has been dragged further into the Epstein mire. American friends of Epstein have always noticed how he delights in his royal links.
There have even been unsubstantiated rumours – most probably started by the financier himself and on which Buckingham Palace has not commented – that one of secretive Epstein’s financial clients was the Queen herself. Murray Gell-Mann, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and recipient of Epstein largesse, said he was given that impression by the financier.
It is unknown whether Epstein has actually met the Queen, but there is no disputing that he was given rare access to the royals’ inner sanctum. In July 1999, Andrew invited Miss Maxwell and Epstein, then her boyfriend, to stay at Craigowan Lodge in the grounds of Balmoral. Andrew lavished hospitality on Epstein and his girlfriend, before escorting his guests on a tour of the estate. For Epstein, the weekend had been a social triumph.
The financier started from humble beginnings. The son of a parks department worker, he was working as a maths teacher in Manhattan in 1976 when he was plucked from obscurity by a pupil’s father who got him a job on Wall Street. For Andrew, his growing closeness to Epstein would cause him intense embarrassment. In 2011, after the photo appeared of him with the billionaire in New York, Andrew was shamed into stepping down as Britain’s trade envoy.
On that occasion, it was the Queen who came to his rescue, in a remarkable show of maternal love. Andrew is the Queen’s favourite son, and she has been deeply upset at the opprobrium heaped on him. Only time will tell how she will react to his latest travails.

MAXWELL'S DAUGHTER THE 'HIGH-CLASS MADAME': COURT PAPERS SAY SHE 'FACILITATED PRINCE ANDREW'S ACTS OF SEXUAL ABUSE'

Socialite: Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of British tycoon Robert, at a New York event in 2010
Socialite: Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of British tycoon Robert, at a New York event in 2010
By Sam Marsden for the Daily Mail

Ghislaine Maxwell stands accused of procuring young girls for the sexual gratification of Jeffrey Epstein and his ‘friends’.
Court documents say she ‘facilitated Prince Andrew’s acts of sexual abuse by acting as a madame for Epstein’.
She was described in the court papers as the ‘primary co-conspirator in Epstein’s sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme’.
The documents said: ‘Maxwell persuaded Jane Doe #3 to come to Epstein’s mansion. Epstein then became enamoured with Jane Doe #3 and with the assistance of Maxwell converted her into what is commonly referred to as a sex slave.’
Miss Maxwell, the cherished daughter of crooked tycoon Robert Maxwell, is no stranger to scandal. Her world came crashing down in 1991 when her father plunged to his death from the deck of his £15million yacht, named Lady Ghislaine in her honour.
Shortly afterwards it was revealed that the notorious newspaper tycoon had stolen £440million from the Mirror Group’s pension fund.
Miss Maxwell and her family were left in disgrace, and she fled to New York to escape the furore in Britain. It was in America that she met Epstein, becoming his girlfriend for a time and attending celebrity events with him. He provided her with a champagne lifestyle of luxurious holidays and palatial apartments that she could never have afforded on the £80,000-a-year her father left her.
In return, she used her contacts to introduce Epstein to leading lights of the world of showbusiness, politics and royalty, including Prince Andrew.
But in recent years she has also faced accusations that she procured girls for Epstein – claims she has always denied.
Miss Maxwell, now 53, was educated at Marlborough College and Oxford University.
In 2000 she and Epstein were seen on holiday with Prince Andrew at Donald Trump’s Mar a Largo Club in Palm Beach, Florida. That same year, she took the prince to a ‘hookers and pimps’ themed party in New York, which was hosted by the former lingerie model Heidi Klum.
There were once rumours that Miss Maxwell would marry Epstein, but their relationship reportedly ended because he wanted to see other women.
However, it is alleged that the services provided by Miss Maxwell to the wealthy financier extended to finding attractive girls for him and his friends.
One girl, Virginia Roberts, has claimed she was 15 when she met Miss Maxwell at a Florida spa in 1998. Miss Maxwell allegedly invited her to come to Epstein’s mansion to be a masseuse. Miss Roberts claims she was made to perform sex acts on Epstein. 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2895366/Prince-Andrew-lobbied-government-easy-Jeffrey-Epstein-Palace-denies-claims-royal-tried-use-influence-help-billionaire-paedophile-2008-police-probe.html#ixzz3NmQWjQCc
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

I will not be bullied into silence': Woman who claims Prince Andrew abused her while she was billionaire's 'underage sex slave' says she is being 'unjustly victimised'

  • Court motion in U.S. brought in relation to millionaire Jeffrey Epstein
  • Epstein, a former friend of the Prince, was convicted of sex crime in 2008
  • Court papers in motion claim woman had sex with Andrew three times
  • They claim meetings took place in London, New York and US Virgin Islands
  • One meeting was 'an orgy with numerous under-aged girls' it is claimed
  • It is said the woman was approached by socialite Ghislaine Maxwell
  • She is the daughter of the late former media mogul, Robert Maxwell  
  • Papers also allege the Prince lobbied US government over Epstein case 
  • The royal has issued a strong denial of the 'categorically untrue' claims 
A woman who claims she was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew on three separate occasions - including at an orgy - has said that she will ‘not be bullied back into silence’ and ‘victimised’.
‘Jane Doe 3’ alleges that she was loaned out to Prince Andrew and other friends by Jeffrey Epstein, an American billionaire who has been convicted of soliciting underage prostitution.
She is said to have been 17 at the time of the alleged meetings, meaning she was underage according to Florida law.
In court documents she accuses Epstein, the Prince, his friend the socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, and – among others – the leading American defence lawyer Alan Dershowitz of abusing her when she was underage.
Her lawyers, who are also representing another woman, ‘Jane Doe 4’, also told an American court that Prince Andrew had lobbied the US government over Epstein’s case.
The Prince today issued a comprehensive denial of the allegations, with Buckingham Palace insisting any suggestion of underage sex on his part is ‘categorically untrue’. 

Scroll down for video  
Prince Andrew pictured in 2011 with multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein, who is at the centre of the new  case
Prince Andrew pictured in 2011 with multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein, who is at the centre of the new case
The royal and Epstein were friends and were seen together in Central Park, New York in 2011 after the financier’s conviction, which came in the wake of an FBI investigation into his associations with underage girls, especially in Florida, where he maintains a home.
‘Jane Doe 3’, who is now an adult, claims that she was groomed on behalf of Epstein by Maxwell – daughter of Robert Maxwell, the disgraced newspaper owner - when she was just 15 and forced into a world of sexual abuse.
It included being ‘forced to have sexual relations with… Prince [Andrew] when she was a minor in London at Ghislaine Maxwell’s apartment, in New York, and on Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands in an orgy with numerous other under-aged girls’, she claimed in documents submitted this week to federal court in Palm Beach, Florida.

Her claims were denounced yesterday as an attempt to make money by Dershowitz, who was part of O.J Simpson’s ‘dream team’ defence and is a professor of law at Harvard.
He told the Guardian, for whom he has written in the past: ‘It is a totally fabricated charge in every possible way. It just never happened.’
He added: ‘This person has made this up out of cloth, maliciously and knowingly in order to extort money from Mr Epstein.’
But Dershowitz was accused by the woman of trying to ‘silence’ her. 
‘I am looking forward to vindicating my rights as an innocent victim and pursuing all available recourse,’ she said.
‘It appears that I am now being unjustly victimized again. These types of aggressive attacks on me are exactly the reason why sexual abuse victims typically remain silent and the reason why I did for a long time.

The court documents claim Ghislaine Maxwell  used her contacts to connect powerful people with Epstein and approached the woman in the case

The court documents claim Ghislaine Maxwell (picture left and right, with Epstein), the daughter of Robert Maxwell, used her contacts to connect powerful people with Epstein and approached the woman in the case
‘That trend should change. I’m not going to be bullied back into silence.’
The allegation that Prince Andrew lobbied the US government was made in the same document.
It demands that the American government be ordered by the federal court to hand over correspondence which the women’s lawyers claim will show Prince Andrew and Dershowitz lobbied against Epstein being prosecuted.
The lawyers say the order they want the court to grant ‘documents regarding Epstein’s lobbying efforts to persuade the Government to give him a more favorable plea arrangement and/or non-prosecution agreement, including efforts on his behalf by Prince Andrew and former Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz’.

WHY HAS PRINCE ANDREW BEEN LINKED TO THE CASE? THE HISTORY BEHIND THE LEGAL MOTION

The Duke of York has been named in a document handed to the Florida court this week in connection with an ongoing lawsuit by two other women who claim they were abused by Epstein.
The multi-millionaire was convicted of sex offences in 2008 after a plea deal which saw him serve 13 months of an 18 month prison sentence.
But two women who say they were abused by him, known as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, said their rights have been violated because they were not consulted before the deal was done and they began suing U.S. prosecutors over their handling of the case six years ago.
Today it was revealed that Jane Doe 3, who has named Prince Andrew, and another woman named as Jane Doe 4, say they have been violated in the same way and want to join the group action.
A spokesman for Prince Andrew said: ‘This relates to long-standing and ongoing civil proceedings in the United States, to which The Duke of York is not a party.
‘As such we would not comment on the detail. However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue’.
The spokesman said that this statement also applied to the allegation that Prince Andrew lobbied the US government. 
As part of the latest court motion, documents have been filed in which the woman alleges she slept with Andrew at three locations; London, New York and the US Virgin Islands.
The woman involved in the case is said to have been 17 at the time of the alleged meetings, meaning she was underage according to the law in Florida.
She claims she was drawn into 'sex trafficking scheme' by Ghislaine Maxwell, the daughter of late media mogul Robert Maxwell.
The court documents say that in 1999 'Jane Doe #3 was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell, one of the main women whom Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator in his sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme'.
According to the documents filed in Florida, Maxwell had 'persuaded' the alleged victim, then 15, to visit Epstein's mansion.
The girl was asked to give Epstein a massage, which 'Epstein and Maxwell turned it into a sexual encounter, as they had done with many other victims', it is alleged.
The woman's legal team say convicted sex offender Epstein became 'enamoured' with the girl and 'with the assistance of Maxwell converted her into a sex slave'.
It is claimed Epstein abused the girl between 1999 to 2002 on his private jets, in New York, New Mexico, and on the U.S. Virgin Islands.
It is alleged that Maxwell used her connections with the rich and powerful and connected them with Epstein.
The document says: 'For instance, one such powerful individual Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was a member of the British Royal Family, Prince Andrew.
'Jane Doe #3 was forced to have sexual relations with this Prince when she was a minor in London at Ghislaine Maxwell's apartment, in New York, and on Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands in an orgy with numerous other under-aged girls'.
It is claimed that Epstein told the girl to 'give the Prince whatever he demanded and required' and she would 'report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse'.
The document says: 'Maxwell facilitated Prince Andrew's acts of sexual abuse by acting as a 'madame' for Epstein, thereby assisting in internationally trafficking Jane Doe #3 and numerous other young girls for sexual purposes'. 
It is claimed that Epstein trafficked the girl to be abused by powerful men across the globe.
These included ‘numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known Prime Minister, and other world leaders’, the court papers say.
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were among guests on this pheasant shoot, attended by Andrew (right), at Sandringham, Norfolk, after the Prince and the US businessman became friends
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were among guests on this pheasant shoot, attended by Andrew (right), at Sandringham, Norfolk, after the Prince and the US businessman became friends
The court documents refer to alleged meetings at Jeffrey Epstein's house in the U.S. Virgin Islands
The court documents refer to alleged meetings at Jeffrey Epstein's house in the U.S. Virgin Islands
It is alleged that in each case Epstein demanded she 'describe the events that she had with these men so that he could potentially blackmail them'. 
'Epstein’s purposes in “lending” Jane Doe (along with other young girls) to such powerful people were to ingratiate himself with them for business, personal, political, and financial gain, as well as to obtain potential blackmail information'.
Mr Epstein's lawyer Jack Goldberger said the allegations were 'old and salacious and had 'been consistently proven to have no merit'.
He said: 'Mr Epstein is used to these spurious, untruthful allegations being made so he takes it in his stride. He knows there's no truth in them'.
Asked why Prince Andrew had been dragged into the lawsuit, Mr Goldberger said: 'I think it's just an attempt to add spice to these unproven and unprovable allegations. There just no truth to it'.
The woman has also made similar allegations against Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz and French model scout Jean Luc Brunel.

KEY ALLEGATIONS: WHAT CLAIMS ARE MADE BY JANE DOES 3 AND 4

- Jeffrey Epstein forced Jane Doe 3 to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew between 1999 and 2002.
 - The girl had sex with the Prince when she 17, which is considered underage in Florida
 - They met for sex in London, New York and on Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands
 - On the final occasion Prince Andrew had sex with her in an 'orgy with numerous other under-aged girls'
 - She was told by the Epstein 'to give the Prince whatever he demanded and report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse'
 - Robert Maxwell's youngest daughter Ghislaine acted as a 'madame' for the girl and allowed Prince Andrew to have sex with her in her London home, documents claim
- In 2002, Jane Doe 4, described at the time as a 'poor and vulnerable 16-year-old' alleges she was told that she could make $300 by 'giving an old man a massage' in Florida
- Epstein subsequently committed 'sexual acts against Jane Doe 4 on many occasions', court documents claim
Mr Brunel is accused of bringing young girls as ‘young as twelve’ to America for sexual purposes and to ‘farm them out to his friends’, including Epstein.
It is alleged that Mr Brunel, a close friend and travel companion of Epstein, would offer the girls, many said to be from poor countries and deprived backgrounds, modelling jobs.
‘He lured them in with a promise of making good money’, the documents claim. 
It is alleged that Prof Dershowitz, who also represented Epstein, is said to have abused the girl on a number of occasions and was ‘an eye-witness to the sexual abuse of many other minors by Epstein and co-conspirators’.
Prof Dershowitz told the Politico website: ‘It’s totally, unequivocally and completely false’.
Epstein was suspected nearly a decade ago of paying for sex with dozens of underage girls.
The FBI ultimately dropped its investigation, and he pleaded guilty to a single offence and served more than a year in jail.
The investigation into Epstein's exploits came when a woman in Palm Beach contacted police saying that her 14-year-old daughter had been paid $300 to massage him and then have sex.
The claim prompted a nearly year-long investigation that led to the eventual charge of soliciting prostitution which came as part of a plea deal. He spent 13 months of a 18-month sentence in jail and remains a registered sex offender.
The latest legal issue refers to the terms of the deal Epstein is believed to have struck with US prosecutors. 
Ghislaine Maxwell was unavailable for comment this afternoon.
She has previously made clear she was not connected to the criminal proceedings against Epstein and said that his cimes were committed long before she had dealings with him. 
Prince Andrew met Epstein, who was born in working-class Brooklyn, during the royal's trips to the US.
It has previously been reported that they were introduced by Ms Maxwell over a decade ago.
The Prince is said to have enjoyed the atmosphere among America's elite and was seen in New York and Florida, both places where Epstein owns property.
Epstein was in turn invited to Britain and, along with Ms Maxwell, was pictured on a pheasant shoot on the Queen's Sandringham Estate in 2000.
A picture of Jeffrey Epstein's apartment in New York, where Prince Andrew is said to have stayed
A picture of Jeffrey Epstein's apartment in New York, where Prince Andrew is said to have stayed
Part of the court document filed, pictured above, demands that the American government be ordered by the federal court to hand over correspondence which the women’s lawyers claim will show Prince Andrew and Dershowitz lobbied against Epstein being prosecuted
Part of the court document filed, pictured above, demands that the American government be ordered by the federal court to hand over correspondence which the women’s lawyers claim will show Prince Andrew and Dershowitz lobbied against Epstein being prosecuted
After Epstein's conviction in 2008, the Prince remained friends with Epstein and they were seen walking together in a New York park in 2011.
The pre-Christmas trip was said to be the first time the duke had seen Epstein in four years. But they were still close friends and would speak on the phone regularly.
The scandal caused by the photograph of the pair together after Epstein's release from jail was one of the factors that led to Andrew stepping down from his role as UK trade envoy in 2011.
His position had been made worse when his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson revealed she had accepted £15,000 from Epstein to help pay off her debts.

HOW GIRL WHO SAYS SHE SAT ON PRINCE ANDREW'S KNEE AND ALLOWED HIM TO TOUCH HER BREAST REVEALED EPSTEIN'S SLEAZY WORLD

Johanna Sjoberg claims she had met the Duke of York over Easter 2001 where she sat on his lap and allowed him to touch her breast 
Johanna Sjoberg claims she had met the Duke of York over Easter 2001 where she sat on his lap and allowed him to touch her breast 
One of Jeffrey Epstein's young personal masseuses claimed she sat on Prince Andrew's knee and allowed him to put his hand on her breast for a jokey photograph.
Johanna Sjoberg had met the Duke of York over Easter 2001 at Epstein's seven-storey townhouse in New York, where she was paid to answer the phones, serve drinks and later carry out massages.
She said: 'Prince Andrew was there. Andrew was very charming. I didn't know exactly who he was but felt that I knew him'.
She was was with another girl, Virginia Roberts, and as a gift she said that the Duke of York was given a Spitting Image puppet by Epstein, and the girls were invited to sit on Andrew's lap.
She said: 'We had a picture taken. Virginia, another girl there, sat on a chair and had the puppet on her lap. Andrew sat on another chair, I sat on his lap – and he put his hand on my breast. 
'Ghislaine (Maxwell) put the puppet's hand on Virginia's breast, then Andrew put his hand on mine. It was a great joke'. 
She said she witnessed Epstein ordering 'girls' to be dispatched thousands of miles to his friends, who were nearly always incredibly rich, powerful
On one occasion she recounted an incident in Palm Beach in 2004 or 2005 in which she overheard the disgraced financier instructing an assistant to sort out two girls for a friend.
Miss Sjoberg would not identify the friend but said he was someone 'very famous' in the beauty industry.
'The conversation went: 'So-and-so's in Hawaii, can we find some girls for him',' she said.
'I didn't realise Jeffrey even knew this person but the thing that shocked me most was that it seemed so normal for him to ask someone to find a couple of girls and send them over.'
Miss Sjoberg worked for Epstein for four years, often massaging him as he lay on a couch in his giant bathroom making phone calls to friends such as Bill Clinton and Cate Blanchett.
He kept a little black book, containing the numbers of all his masseuses by a phone in the bathroom, she said. She left after he started becoming 'more aggressive' in his demands that she 'do sexual things to him'.
She said she was aware that the girls recruited by Epstein and his acolytes were not paid just for massages but for 'sexual favours'. 
Virginia Roberts revealed that as a 17-year-old 'erotic masseuse', she was flown by Epstein to London to meet Prince Andrew,
Miss Sjoberg said: 'I'm not surprised he was sending girls abroad. I just did not think they were so young.'  
The Prince has insisted that any suggestion of wrongdoing on his part is 'categorically untrue'.
A spokesman for the royal said: 'This relates to long-standing and ongoing civil proceedings in the United States, to which The Duke of York is not a party.
'As such we would not comment on the detail. However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue'. 
How one of the best-connected men in the U.S. was jailed amid shocking claims of sex abuse
By Daniel Bates in New York for MailOnline 
The scandal of Jeffrey Epstein brought down one of the world’s richest and most powerful men - and damaged anyone who was close to him.
The billionaire financier spent 13 months in jail in 2008 for soliciting girls for underage prostitution but multiples lawsuits by his alleged victims say that the abuse at his Florida mansion was far more widespread and systematic.
Some 40 women came forward claiming that he or others molested them - with all the cases being settled out of court without any admission of liability.
The abuse as laid out in court documents was shocking.
Among the allegations was that for his birthday one year Epstein was presented with three 12-year-old girls from France for his sexual pleasure.
Jeffrey Epstein, pictured in New York with Woody Allen, was once one of the best-connected men in America
Jeffrey Epstein, pictured in New York with Woody Allen, was once one of the best-connected men in America
Alleged victims said they had to give ‘massages’ to Epstein, 61, and told how he loaned them out to wealthy friends so they could abuse them.
Prince Andrew was caught up in the scandal when he remained friends with Epstein even after he was released from jail and became a registered sex offender.
When the two men were photographed together in New York’s Central Park in 2011 Andrew was forced to step down from his role as Britain’s trade envoy because of the uproar.
The Prince was also photographed with Virginia Roberts, one of the girls Epstein is said to have used as an underage sex slave, who gave an interview in which she described her alleged ordeal.
Epstein was jailed after a legal case which rocked America and in which President Bill Clinton was named
Epstein was jailed after a legal case which rocked America and in which President Bill Clinton was named
Bill Clinton was also named dozens of times in lawsuits against Epstein and was alleged to have flown on his private jet more than 10 times.
Flight logs in lawsuits detailed that between 2002 and 2005 the former US President traveled around the world courtesy of his friend and stopped at Epstein’s Caribbean island Little St James where young girls were supposedly kept as sex slaves.
Clinton was deemed to be so close to Epstein that he was nearly deposed during the investigation into his paedophilia.
Before he was jailed Epstein’s other acquaintances are said to have been former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak; former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson; and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers.
The latest developments are part of a case against US authorities brought by two of Epstein’s alleged victims who were 13 and 14 when they say the abuse occurred.
They claim that his original sentence was too light because his lawyers had secretly reached a non-prosecution agreement months earlier with the US Justice Department.
The women say the failure to disclose the deal violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act of 2004 and that Epstein’s sentence should be thrown out, exposing him to a much harsher punishment.
Epstein, who has a $2 billion from hedge funds, continues to lead a luxury lifestyle and is now based in the US Virgin Islands.

GIRL WAS RECRUITED AS EPSTEIN'S MASSEUSE AT 15 AND WAS FLOWN ACROSS THE WORLD TO MEET PRINCE ANDREW

Virginia Roberts said she was recruited as Epstein's masseuse when she was just 15 and paid $200 a time for an 'erotic massage' for him and his friends. She claimed she later became the billionaire's sex slave.
Now a married mother of three living in Australia, Virginia alleged that her services were offered to a number of politicians, businessmen and international statesmen.
She also met Prince Andrew. The first time was at the London house of Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of the disgraced former media tycoon Robert Maxwell.
This picture, said to have been taken by Epstein during Andrew's first encounter with Virginia Roberts in March 2001, shows the Prince with his arm around her waist
This picture, said to have been taken by Epstein during Andrew's first encounter with Virginia Roberts in March 2001, shows the Prince with his arm around her waist
The second time was at Epstein's grand New York townhouse and the third on Epstein's private Caribbean island.
It was reported that she was flown across the world to be introduced to the Prince. On one of those occasions Virginia Roberts was subsequently paid $15,000 (£9,400).
One picture, said to have been taken by Epstein during Andrew's first encounter with the girl in March 2001, shows the Prince with his arm around her waist.
Describing what happened she said Epstein invited her to accompany him on a six-week trip.
'He said we'd be going to Europe and North Africa to meet architects and interior decorators because he wanted to redo his New Mexico house. I threw my arms around him and gave him a peck on the cheek.'
They flew to Paris, then Spain, then Tangier and finally, they went to London.
'After we landed, we drove straight to Ghislaine's Maxwell's house' and 'was given a small upstairs bedroom,' Virginia said.
She said: 'The following morning, Ghislaine came in. She was chirpy and jumped on the bed saying, 'Get up, sleepyhead. You've got a big day. We've got to go shopping. You need a dress as you're going to dance with a Prince tonight.'
'She said I needed to be 'smiley' and bubbly because he was the Queen's son.
'Ghislaine and I went to Burberry, where she bought me a £5,000 bag, and to a few other designer stores where we bought a couple of dresses, a pair of embroidered jeans and a pink singlet, perfume and make-up,' she said.
'We got back to Ghislaine's house at around 4pm and I ran straight upstairs to shower and dress.
'When I went downstairs, Ghislaine and Jeffrey were in the lounge. There was a knock at the door. Ghislaine led Andrew in and we kissed each other on the cheek.
'Ghislaine served tea from a porcelain pot and biscuits. She knew Sarah Ferguson and they talked fondly about Andrew's daughters.
'Then Ghislaine asked Andrew how old he thought I was and he guessed 17'.

Holiday: Ms Roberts says she met Prince Andrew on three occasions, including on Jeffrey Epstein's private Caribbean Island
Holiday: Ms Roberts says she met Prince Andrew on three occasions, including on Jeffrey Epstein's private Caribbean Island

The four of them went out to dinner and on to Tramp nightclub where, she says, Andrew danced with her.
'After about an hour-and-a-half, we drove back to Ghislaine's. All of us went upstairs and I asked Jeffrey to snap a picture of me with the Prince. I wanted something to show my Mom. Ghislaine and Jeffrey left us after that, and later Andrew left'. 
Her shocking account of her four years as Epstein's personal masseuse is supported by court documents, an eyewitness, photographs and flight details of Epstein's private jets.
Virginia, who has undergone counselling to try to come to terms with her past, is honest about her initiation into Epstein's depraved world.
After she said she was groomed she claims he guaranteed her a minimum of $200 each time she gave him what he called an 'erotic massage.'
Virginia said: 'I would always receive the money immediately. He would give me the cash from a wad he carried in a black duffel bag or an assistant paid me'.
And, because of the way Epstein had warped her sensibilities, every time she took the cash, Virginia said she felt even more indebted to him. Secretly, he was also preparing her for an even more disturbing role.
She said: 'Epstein had trained me to do whatever men wanted. I told myself I was special
'Basically, I was training to be a prostitute for him and his friends who shared his interest in young girls,' she says: 'After about two years, he started to ask me to 'entertain' his friends.'
It started when Epstein called Virginia at the Palm Beach apartment he had rented for her.
She recalls: 'He said, 'I've got a good friend and I need you to fly to the island to entertain him, massage him and make him feel how you make me feel.'
He didn't spell out what I had to do. He didn't have to. 'He'd trained me to do whatever a man wanted. I was shocked but I told myself he was sharing me around because he trusted me and I was special.
'I was worried, but I would do anything to keep Jeffrey happy and to keep my place as his number one girl'.
The Oxford-educated daughter of disgraced British tycoon who 'introduced Epstein to Prince Andrew' 
Educated at Marlborough School and Balliol College, Oxford, Ms Maxwell was taken under Epstein’s wing in New York after her father Robert’s death in 1991. 
His body was found floating in the sea after he fell from the luxury yacht named after his daughter, the Lady Ghislaine.
His death revealed a vast financial black hole at the heart of his Mirror Group, including the employees’ pension scheme. 

Ghislaine Maxwell, left, with her parents, Robert and Elizabeth, in 1987 - four years before Robert's death
Ghislaine Maxwell, left, with her parents, Robert and Elizabeth, in 1987 - four years before Robert's death

As police untangled the complicated web of alleged fraud in his companies and a series of criminal trials was launched to try to track down missing money, there remained persistent rumours that his family had salted away large sums to fund lives of continuing luxury.
The Maxwell name became tainted at home in Britain as fraud trials, bankruptcy and disgrace swirled around the family.
But in Manhattan, Ghislaine set up home ‘in a one-bedroom apartment. She was young, good-looking and charming — the quintessential New York girl about town’.

Well-connected and charismatic, Ms Maxwell (pictured last year), established herself as a leading New York socialite after moving to Manhattan
Well-connected and charismatic, Ms Maxwell (pictured last year), established herself as a leading New York socialite after moving to Manhattan

There, she met Epstein and was photographed as his ‘celebrity guest’ at social functions. The pair would soon become inseparable.
Ghislaine, who turned 30 around the time they met, became Epstein’s girlfriend and then his Girl Friday. Their early romance petered out because he wanted to see other women.
Bankrolled by the billionaire, she established herself as a leading New York socialite and repaid the favour by putting Epstein in touch with her own well-heeled friends in Britain.
She was also allegedly involved in the recruiting of young women who worked as masseuses for Epstein.
In 1998, Ms Maxwell allegedly recruited 15-year-old Virginia Roberts.
Miss Roberts has said she spent the next four years supplying Epstein with sexual favours, and was flown to various locations to service different men, including one head of state.
But she also provided him with an entry into British society – including the friendship with Prince Andrew. She is understood to have introduced the pair in 2000.
Between 2000 and 2001, Andrew and Ghislaine were together on no fewer than eight occasions.
Epstein was present at four of the meetings – at the Mar-a-Lago club in Florida (from where Virginia was recruited), in Phuket, and two occasions in Britain.
The first was a June engagement at Windsor Castle to celebrate the Queen’s birthday, the second a weekend house party at Sandringham six months later which the prince arranged to celebrate Miss Maxwell’s 39th birthday.
In addition, Andrew has often been seen at Epstein’s grand New York townhouse.
In between, Ms Maxwell took the royal to an infamous ‘hookers and pimps’ party at a New York nightclub hosted by the former lingerie model Heidi Klum in a black latex S&M outfit.
A spokesman for Ghislaine Maxwell has previously said that she has never been contacted by any police force or other law enforcement agency in connection with any allegations made against Jeffery Epstein.
Here are the full court papers filed in the Southern District Court of Florida:  

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2894480/Prince-Andrew-repeatedly-slept-sex-slave-controlled-underage-prostitution-ring-U-S-court-papers-claim.html#ixzz3NmS8V0LZ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

Why Hollywood Doesn't Care About Woody Allen Pedophile Claims

You may not have heard the story. Mia Farrow and her adopted daughter Dylan are charging that Woody Allen molested Dylan when she was around 7-years-old. There is no need to go into the details.
The thing of it is, in Hollywood it’s a big yawn. Why should the sex-romping, divorce filing, omni-sexual escapades of so many people in the film and entertainment industry be concerned about some guy having sex with a child? In fact, as I explain below, such practices are common in Hollywood if former child actors are telling the truth.
We don’t know who’s telling the truth. It’s hard not to trust what a child says. But there are cases where custody cases often degenerate into accusations that involve sex with a child. Making the accusation is enough “evidence” for a court to award custody to the mother.
It doesn’t help Woody Allen’s case that he married one of Mia Farrow’s adopted daughters, Soon-Yi Farrow Previn, when she was 21 and Allen was 56. They actually got married. Allen and Farrow were never married, and there’s the rub. He and Farrow were involved sexually with one another for 12 years.
In a 2011 interview, Allen said, “What was the scandal? I fell in love with this girl, married her. We have been married for almost 15 years now. There was no scandal, but people refer to it all the time as a scandal and I kind of like that in a way because when I go I would like to say I had one real juicy scandal in my life.” Allen admitted that he’s not religious. He’s an atheist. So what did or could he do wrong? He can skirt today’s moral conventions because they’re changing all the time. There are no longer any moral norms.
Two years ago, The Daily Mail reported this story:
“A wave of child abuse allegations in Hollywood have emerged . . . – including that of a Julliard-trained ‘Sesame Street’ composer who allegedly produced and distributed porn, and a Hollywood manager who was charged with abusing a former client.
“Which begs the question – is there a heinous epidemic of child abuse in Hollywood?
“Recent childhood abuse allegations have brought to the forefront atrocious reports from former child actors who said paedophilia has been a common practice in Hollywood.”
Here’s what Corey Feldman told ABC’s Nightline when the report surfaced: “I can tell you that the number one problem in Hollywood was and always will be paedophilia. That’s the biggest problem for children in this industry. . . It’s the biggest secret.”
Little House on the Prairie star Alison Arngrim agreed. ‘This has been going on for a very long time,’ she told Fox News. ‘It was the gossip back in the 80s. People said, “Oh yeah, the Coreys [Corey Feldman and Corey Haim], everyone’s had them.” People talked about it like it was no big deal.’”
By “had,” she means “had sex with them.”
Feldman had this to say in a recent Fox411 interview about his book Coreography:
FOX411: You write that Corey Haim was raped by a very powerful Hollywood player on the set of ‘Lucas’ and he tried to initiate something with you.
Feldman: In his mind that was just what guys do, that's what he tried to sell me on. He wasn't bisexual. He didn't understand what was right and wrong. He'd been manipulated and lied to and used and abused. So was I, but I wasn't yet at that point. He told me, to me it was the craziest story I had ever heard. I had to explain, ‘No man that's not how it goes.’ But then a few months later the same thing happened to me, though not as graphically.
FOX411: You say that pedophilia is common in Hollywood.
Feldman: I think there's a lot more of it than we'd like to believe and a lot more of it in all paths of life. The world is a very, very dark place right now. Right now, more than any other time in the history of mankind we need to have spirituality in our lives, we need to believe in a higher power and stay positive no matter what.
Instead of confronting this “dark place,” we have homosexuality and homosexual marriages forced on the rest of us as a new moral norm. Chris Christie capitulated in New Jersey, and New Jersey Senator Corey Booker is married homosexuals as fast as he could when he was major.
So why would Hollywood raise objections to what Woody Allen allegedly did? By what standard and who says?

Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/14275/hollywood-doesnt-care-woody-allen-pedophile-claims/#gb9R7wTgpIq6470L.99
 
 
Viewing all 755 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images