Quantcast
Viewing all 760 articles
Browse latest View live

ZENA TAHHAN - PALESTINE INHABITED BY ONLY 3% JEWS BEFORE THE BRITISH OCCUPATION.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image result for Zena Tahhan


 Zena Tahhan

Zionism: Fifty Years of Israeli Land Theft, Step-By-Step




Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

With the rise of Zionism in the 19th century, land was purchased for settlement – they they started stealing it.


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
By Zena Tahhan

Fifty years ago, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 242. The resolution is used as a framework for implementing the two-state solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
But since its adoption in 1967, Israel has violated the resolution by entrenching its occupation of the Palestinian territories through illegal settlements.
  • 600,000 – 750,000: Illegal settlers in the occupied Palestinian territories
  • 150: Settlements
  • 119: Outposts
  • 42%: Of West Bank land controlled by settlements
  • 86%: Of East Jerusalem for Israeli state and settler use
The majority of settlements have been built either entirely or partially on private Palestinian property

Introduction

To the casual visitor or tourist driving through the occupied West Bank or Jerusalem, Israeli settlements may appear as just another set of houses on a hill.
The middle-class suburban style townhouses, built fast and locked in a grid of uniform units, stand like fortified compounds, in direct contrast to the sprawling limestone Palestinian homes below.
Settlement homes, mostly constructed of cement with a cosmetic limestone cladding, tend to fashion a similar look: American-style villas topped by red-tiled roofs and surrounded by lush, neatly trimmed green lawns.
The largest settlement, Modi’in Illit, houses more than 64,000 Israeli Jews in the occupied West Bank. The mega-settlement has its own mayor, as well as schools, shopping malls and medical centres.
Some settlements even have their own universities.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Today, between 600,000 and 750,000 Israelis live in these sizeable settlements, equivalent to roughly 11 percent of the total Jewish Israeli population.
They live beyond the internationally recognised borders of their state, on Palestinian land that Israel occupied in 1967, comprising East Jerusalem and the West Bank.
Since then, the Israeli government has openly funded and built settlements for Israeli Jews to live there, offering incentives and subsidised housing.
So why have these housing compounds caused so much rancour and been called a threat to the prospect of peace in the Holy Land?
Follow this journey to find out.

What Are Settlements and How Did They Come About?


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Contrary to common belief, settlements are a legacy of the pre-1948 period, before the creation of Israel.
In the 1880s, the community of Palestinian Jews, known as the Yishuv, amounted to three percent of the total population. They were apolitical and did not aspire to build a modern Jewish state.
But in the late 19th century, the Zionist movement – a political ideology – grew out of Eastern Europe, claiming that Jews were a nation or race that deserved a modern “Jewish state”.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
The movement, citing the biblical belief that God promised Palestine to the Jews, began to buy land there and build settlements to strengthen their claim to the land.
At the time, these settlements, built largely on the coastal plain and in the north of the country, were called “Kibbutzim” and “Moshavim”.
The first Kibbutz Degania, was established in 1909 by European Jewish colonists. Tel Aviv, now the economic capital of Israel, was also built in the early 20th century and was one of the first settlements.
The approach is known as “creating facts on the ground” – laying a stake in an area to ensure that it will be part of a future state and difficult to get rid of later on.
The distribution of the settlements determined the map of the proposed United Nations Partition Plan for Jewish and Palestinian states in 1947.
By 1948, prior to the ethnic cleansing of Palestine by the Zionist movement, Jews had control over less than six percent of the land.
According to Israeli statistics, there were some 80 kibbutzim and moshavim before 1948. 1950 – 214 kibbutzim, 67,550 total population

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

What Happened in 1948?

As European Jews began to colonise Palestine – many pushed by anti-Semitic persecution in Europe – the balance of land control between Palestinians and immigrant Jews shifted significantly.
The project was facilitated by the British, who were occupying Palestine from 1917 to 1947, with the aim of building a Jewish state.
Between 1922 and 1935, the Jewish population rose from nine percent to nearly 27 percent of the total population, displacing tens of thousands of Palestinian tenants from their lands as Zionists bought land from absentee landlords.
Under the 1947 UN Partition Plan, Jews were allocated 55 percent of the land, encompassing many of the main cities with Palestinian Arab majorities and the important coastline from Haifa to Jaffa.
The plan would deprive the Palestinian state of key agricultural lands and seaports, which led the Palestinians to reject the proposal.
Shortly after the issuance of UN Resolution 181 that called for partition, war broke out between Palestinian Arabs and Zionist armed groups, who, unlike the Palestinians, had gained extensive training and arms from fighting alongside Britain in World War II.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Zionist paramilitary groups launched a violent process of ethnic cleansing in the form of large-scale attacks, massacres, and destruction of entire villages aimed at the mass expulsion of Palestinians to build the Jewish state. By the end of 1949, the Jewish state had taken up some 78 percent of historical Palestine.
Of the remaining Palestinian territories, the West Bank and East Jerusalem came under Jordan’s control, while Gaza was placed under Egyptian control.
The international community recognised Israel based on the 1948 borders.
But less than 20 years later – in 1967 – another Arab-Israeli war broke out. During the fighting, Israel militarily occupied the rest of historical Palestine, consisting of East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Israel also occupied the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula and the Syrian Golan Heights. With the exception of the Sinai Peninsula, all the other territories remain occupied until today.
In response, the UN Security Council members voted unanimously for Resolution 242 on November 22, 1967 – exactly fifty years ago.
The resolution stated that Israel must withdraw from the territories it seized in the war and formed the basis for all ensuing diplomatic negotiations on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on the concept of “land for peace”.
Israel, however, did not accept the resolution and continues to violate it to this day, 50 years later, by building settlements on the territories meant for a Palestinian state.

What Israel Did with Jerusalem

Shortly after the 1967 war, Israel illegally annexed East Jerusalem and declared it part of its “eternal, undivided” capital.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Map of East Jerusalem in 2007 shows the separation wall (in red) and the Israeli settlements in purple on areas of the occupied West Bank illegally annexed to Jerusalem. Source: United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
This meant that it extended its law to East Jerusalem and claimed it as part of Israel, unlike the West Bank, which it physically occupies but does not claim.
The annexation of East Jerusalem is not recognised by any country in the world as it violates several principles of international law, which outlines that an occupying power does not have sovereignty in the territory it occupies.
The international community, including the US, officially regards East Jerusalem as occupied territory.
However, since Israel considers East Jerusalem part of its state, it calls the settlements there “neighbourhoods”.

Israel’s Settlement Project after 1967: How Is It Different?

When the guns fell silent in 1967, the Israeli state began building colonies, or settlements, for its Jewish Israeli citizens on Palestinian land it had just occupied.
Settlements have become the hallmark of the Israeli colonial project in Palestine.
In the last 50 years, the Israeli government has transferred between 600,000 and 750,000 Jewish Israelis to the West Bank and East Jerusalem. They live in at least 160 settlements and outposts.
This means that roughly 11 percent of Israel’s 6.6 million Jewish population now lives on occupied land, outside the internationally recognised borders of Israel.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Left-wing Israeli protesters hold signs during a protest in Tel Aviv condemning an attack by settlers that killed an 18-month Palestinian baby in 2015 in the occupied West Bank. Source: [REUTERS/Baz Ratner]
The dilemma of the settlements and the occupation has effectively split Israelis between those who believe it is their God-given right to settle land that was promised to the Jewish people, and others who believe the settlements are a death sentence for the Jews.
To religious Jews, the outcome of the 1967 war and the seizure of the remainder of historical Palestine – particularly East Jerusalem, which houses the Old City – led to a sense of euphoria.
Thousands of Jews, including secular Jews, flocked to the Western Wall, also known as the al-Buraq Wall to Muslims. They wept as they gave thanks for what they believed was a miracle from God.
The majority of Israeli Zionist leftists who oppose the settlement project however, believe in the Jewish state along 1948 borders and reject Israel’s expansion into the occupied territories.
To Palestinians, Israel’s occupation and the settlement project did not come as a surprise; the Zionist movement was founded by non-natives to colonise the land, just as they did in 1948.
Munir Nuseibah, a law professor at al-Quds University in Jerusalem, says the occupation and the settlement project “reminded the world of the colonial aspects of Israel”.

Why Are They Illegal under International Law?

In a series of agreements known as the Geneva Conventions, formulated in the aftermath of World War II, the international community established a set of accepted rules and standards for the protection of civilians, prisoners and injured people in times of war.
Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, which defines humanitarian protections for civilians caught in a war zone, an occupying power is forbidden from transferring parts of its civilian population into the territory it occupies.
The rationale behind this is simple.
  1. To ensure that the occupation is temporary and allow for a solution to the conflict by preventing To ensure that the occupation is temporary and allow for a solution to the conflict by preventing the occupying power from acquiring long-term interests through military control.
  2. To protect occupied civilians from theft of resources by the occupying power.
  3. To prohibit a de facto situation in which two groups living on the same land are subject to two different legal systems, i.e. apartheid.
  4. To prevent changes in the demographic makeup of the occupied territory.
But the Israeli government maintains that the status of the Palestinian territories is ambiguous, as there was no internationally recognised government in the territories prior to the 1967 war. The Israeli government argues that it took the territory from Jordan, which had control of the West Bank and East Jerusalem between 1949 and 1967, while Egypt had control of the Gaza Strip.
Israel regards the West Bank as “disputed” territory and thus refutes the existence of a military occupation there; saying the Fourth Geneva Convention does not apply. But the UN, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Court of Justice, and the international community have all affirmed that it does.
Israel also denies that any of the settlements were built on private Palestinian land.

What Types of Settlements Are There?

There are three main types of Israeli colonies in the occupied Palestinian territories, all of which involve seizing Palestinian land and are all illegal under international law.
Settlements
Built by the Israeli government, mainly in rural areas in the West Bank and Jerusalem, many are on private Palestinian property and within close proximity to Palestinian towns and cities,
After the signing of the Oslo Accords in the early 1990s, the Israeli government stopped officially building new settlements but expanded existing ones,
In 2017, Israel started building the first new settlement in two decades.
Outposts
Built without the official authorisation of the Israeli government but with financial support from Israeli politicians and government ministries,
Illegal under Israeli law, but usually retroactively approved as official settlements,
In 2017, Israel passed a land-theft law that allows the legalisation of outposts provided the settlers could prove ignorance that they had built on privately owned land or under state orders.
Jerusalem’s Enclaves
Established mainly by Israeli right-wing organisations with the help of the Israeli government in the heart of Palestinian neighbourhoods in East Jerusalem,
Some involve taking over Palestinian homes and evicting their residents using Israeli laws that favour Jews over non-Jews,
Of the 200,000 Israeli Jews that live in East Jerusalem settlements, some 2,000 live in the midst of Palestinian neighbourhoods under army protection

How Does Israel Take over Land?

Israel has developed a myriad of ways to seize Palestinian land.
Since Israel has not annexed the occupied West Bank and does not have jurisdiction there, it uses military orders as well as its own interpretations of Ottoman, British and Jordanian laws to seize Palestinian property.
In East Jerusalem however, the state applies Israeli law, despite the fact that the territory is considered occupied under international law, and the Palestinians who live there are not Israeli citizens.
Declaration of “State Land”
Israel has declared at least 26 percent of the West Bank as “state land”.
Using a different interpretation of Ottoman, British and Jordanian laws, Israel stole public and private Palestinian land for settlements under the pretext of “state land”.
Though many Palestinians had paid taxes and cultivated their land for decades, most land wasn’t registered during the Ottoman and British occupations; in 1968, Israel stopped the process of land registration and declared any unregistered land as belonging to the Israeli government.
Settlements on “state land” often expand into surrounding, privately owned, Palestinian land.
As an occupying power, Israel does not own the West Bank and is not permitted under international law to seize land in this manner.
Expropriation for “Public Needs”
Based on the law in the West Bank, a state is only allowed to expropriate private land for public Palestinian needs.
Israel uses this law, however, to confiscate private land for building Jewish-only settlement roads, connecting them with one another and to Israel.
Using a similar law in East Jerusalem, Israel built the 12 settlements in East Jerusalem on Palestinian property declared “for public needs”.
Requisition of Land for “Military Needs”
This allows the Israeli army to issue a “temporary” seizure order on private land, after which the ownership of the area is transferred to Israel,
As opposed to expropriation, this law leaves the plot of land under the name of the original owners until the army no longer needs the land, but the areas have almost never been returned to their Palestinian owners.
Since 1967, the Israeli army has used this pretext to seize land for at least 42 settlements, maintain “secure zones” around the settlements, build bypass roads that allow soldiers and settlers to travel without having to cross Palestinian cities, and construct the separation wall.
Absentee Land
In 1950, Israel introduced the Absentee Property Law to confiscate the property of the 800,000 Palestinians who were forced to flee their homes between 1947 and 1949, due to the Nakba.
The law encompassed those Palestinians who were displaced to the West Bank, East Jerusalem, Gaza, or to neighbouring countries.
Israel claimed that it would use the law to protect private properties until the refugees could return, but simultaneously banned them from returning and sold their land to Jewish Israelis,
After the 1967 war and occupation of the West Bank, Israel applied this law in the form of a military order that saw the transfer of all property belonging to Palestinian refugees who left the West Bank during 1967 to the Israeli government,
In 2015, the Israeli government made this law applicable to East Jerusalem and used it to seize private property of Jerusalem refugees in the West Bank or Gaza who are forbidden from returning to their homes.
This legislation is illegal under international law, which stipulates the need to respect the right of private property and prohibits its expropriation after the termination of war.

Why the Locations of Settlements Matter

Settlements are scattered across the West Bank in a way that makes a contiguous Palestinian state impossible, while in Jerusalem the Israeli government has built settlements around the city to consolidate control over it.
These “ring neighbourhoods” are a set of major settlement blocs to the north, east and south of the Jerusalem, which Israel hopes to annex to its state.
The ring settlements have effectively cut off the West Bank’s north from the south, impeding the ability of Palestinians to travel between cities in a normal fashion.
The building of these Jewish settlements around the city was not random but rather tells of a deeper Israeli political aim.
After the 1967 war and the Israeli occupation of East Jerusalem, Teddy Kollek, the mayor of the contested city, said in 1968: “The object is to ensure that all of Jerusalem remains forever a part of Israel. If this city is to be our capital, then we have to make it an integral part of our country, and we need Jewish inhabitants to do that.”
Indeed, Israel formalised its annexation of the eastern half of the city in 1980 when it passed the Jerusalem Law, claiming that “Jerusalem, complete and united, is the capital of Israel”, in violation of international law, which states that the city should be administered by the UN for its importance to the three Abrahamic religions.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
The purpose was to seal the fate of Jerusalem and thwart negotiations over the city in any future agreement.
The woman who first introduced the Jerusalem Law to the Israeli parliament, Geula Cohen, also believes that Israel could annex the entire West Bank “if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wills it”.
Israeli lawmakers are now making moves to annex three large settlement blocs in the occupied West Bank to the Israeli-defined boundaries of Jerusalem.
The so-called “Greater Jerusalem bill” would see the addition of 140,000 Jewish Israelis who live in these settlements to the population of Jerusalem, to ensure a Jewish majority in the city.
“The government will approve the Greater Jerusalem law that will strengthen the eternal capital Jerusalem – demographically and geographically,” Yoav Kish, the Knesset member (MK) who submitted the proposal for the bill, said on Twitter.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
A man places the Palestinian flag on the controversial Israeli separation wall, with Israeli settlements showing in the background. Source: [REUTERS/Ammar Awad]
In 2004, Israel began building the separation wall, which was meant to provide “security” for Israelis by dividing between the West Bank and Israel following the second Palestinian uprising in 2000.
Israel has however used the wall to annex more land to its borders and has built it around some of the largest settlements in the West Bank, placing them on the “Israeli side”.
Some 85 percent of the wall falls inside the West Bank, and not on the Green Line. Palestinians have therefore aptly described the wall as an “annexation wall”.
In 2009, the Jerusalem municipality adopted a master plan intended “to guide and outline the city’s development in the next decades”. The vision, as stated in the plan, is to create a ratio of 70 percent Israeli Jews to 30 percent Palestinians in the city.

Does Israel Hope to Annex the West Bank as Well?


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
While many Israeli members of parliament hope to annex the entire West Bank – which they call by its biblical name, Judea and Samaria – there is a fear that bringing the territory into the boundaries of Israel would upset the population ratio by tipping the demographic balance in favour of the Palestinians in the country.
Annexing the West Bank would mean giving the 3.1 million Palestinians who live there Israeli citizenship and extending Israeli law, instead of martial law, to the area. Many see this as “an end to the Jewish state”, as Palestinians would outnumber Jewish Israelis.
But the growing settlement enterprise across the West Bank brings this possibility closer to reality every day.
Map shows Area C (in dark brown), and the route of the separation wall, which Israel has used to annex parts of the West Bank to East Jerusalem
Source: United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
For some Israeli right-wing ministers, the annexation of Area C – which makes up 60 percent of the West Bank and is subject to total Israeli control – is a more realistic aim for the time being.
All the settlements are located in Area C, where some 300,000 Palestinians live – a figure consistently under-reported by Israeli politicians. Annexing the territory would mean that Israel could absorb the maximum amount of land with the least number of Palestinians.
The settlements in the West Bank are already connected to East Jerusalem and Israel through a series of Jewish-only roads that give the settlers the luxury of crossing the Green Line without having to pass through Palestinian population centres – as though they live in one single state.
The situation in Area C, where Israel consistently acts to minimise Palestinian presence through home demolitions, displacement, theft of resources and refusing to grant building permits, amounts to de facto annexation.
Quotes from Israeli Politicians on Annexation
I believe that our right to the Land is absolute and unshakable and it that [sic] includes the entire Land […] The correct policy, from the point of view of Israeli interests regarding our political ability at the moment, is to combine the attempt to hold the maximum amount of territory and apply sovereignty over the maximum amount of territory while keeping the Arab population within it to a minimum. This situation already exists in Area C, which is under our control; there are little more than 50,000 Arabs.
Yariv Levin – 2014
The only way to restore calm is to restore our sense of justice. To internalize that this is our Land. Exclusively. We must end the ‘Occupation’ and declare complete and exclusive sovereignty over all parts of the Land of Israel in our hands.
Moshe Feiglin – 2015
Citizens of Israel have paid in no end of victims, tens of thousands of missiles and no end of denunciations for this messianic policy of a Palestinian state. The conclusion is to stop marching toward the foolish path of a Palestinian state and to impose Israeli law on Ma’aleh Adumim, the Jordan Valley, Ofra, Ariel and all of Area C as soon as possible. This is how we win.
Natfali Bennett – 2017

How Do They Impact Palestinians?

Overview
Besides being built illegally on private and public Palestinian land, settlements impact the day-to-day life of Palestinians in many ways.
In 2016, the UN found that the economy of the occupied Palestinian territories would be twice as large if the 50-year occupation were lifted.
Israel’s policies of occupation and settlement have come to be seen as a purposeful strategy of de-development to weaken resistance to military rule and thwart attempts to build a successful Palestinian state.

Theft of resources

The settlements have only been able to thrive through severe economic exploitation of the occupied West Bank at the expense of the natives.
While the majority of the Palestinian population in the West Bank live in Areas A and B, the infrastructure upon which their livelihood depends either lies in or crosses into Area C.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Close to half of the Biet Owwa village (pictured) lies in Area C and has been severely affected by the settlements, checkpoints and the separation wall surrounding it. [5:28] Source: [REUTERS/Mussa Qawasma]
The area encompasses the territory’s water resources, most fertile pasture and agricultural land, as well as mining and mineral extraction resources and tourist sites.
Palestinian access to Area C, some 60 percent of the West Bank, is either completely prohibited or highly restricted, causing an annual loss of $3.4bn to the economy.
Water
Israel controls some 90 percent about six times more w of the water resources
Israeli settlers use about six times more water than the 3.1 million Palestinians in the West Bank do.
Jordan Valley and Dead Sea
The Jordan Valley and the northern part of the Dead Sea are the most fertile areas in the West Bank.
Some 40 percent of the dates produced in the occupied Jordan Valley settlements are exported by Israel to the European Union.
Israeli companies generate some $3bn annually from the sale of Dead Sea minerals.
Annual Israeli revenue from the exploitation of Palestinian land and resources in these areas is estimated at about $130 million.
Quarries and Stone Mining
Since 1994, Israel has refused to issue new permits to Palestinian stone mining and quarrying companies – the largest Palestinian industry – while operating some 11 quarries for Israeli use.
Israel’s virtual ban on Palestinian permits for quarries costs the Palestinian economy at least $241 million per year.
About 75 percent of the production of Israeli-operated quarries in the occupied West Bank is used in Israel.
Agriculture
Palestinians are deprived of access to 85 percent of the grazing lands in the entire West Bank.
Only 21 percent of cultivable land is being utilised.
Restrictions by Israel on the importation of fertilisers add some $28 million to the costs borne by producers.
Freedom of Movement and the Separation Wall
Israel uses various methods to hinder Palestinian movement in the West Bank for the protection of Israeli settlers.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Palestinians cross through the Israeli Qalandia military checkpoint near the occupied West Bank city of Ramallah Source: [REUTERS/Ammar Awad]
  • By the end of 2016, there were 572 obstacles to the free movement of Palestinians, including military checkpoints and roadblocks, in the occupied West Bank.
  • The separation wall has physically separated Palestinian communities from one another and added hours to otherwise short commutes.
  • Palestinians in certain areas must cross a checkpoint to enter and exit their villages.
Settler Violence
Due to the close proximity of settlements to Palestinian homes, friction and violence between settlers and Palestinians is a near-daily reality.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
A Palestinian boy sits on his bicycle as he looks at a torched car in the Palestinian village of Zubeidat in the Jordan Valley in 2013. Source: [REUTERS/Mohamad Torokman]
  • In the first half of 2017, the UN documented 89 incidents in which Israeli settlers killed or injured Palestinians or damaged Palestinian property.
  • The main forms of violence by Israeli settlers include throwing stones at Palestinian homes and vehicles, physically assaulting Palestinians, uprooting or damaging olive trees, vandalising property, or setting fire to agricultural lands.
  • In 2016, more than 1,500 Palestinian olive trees were damaged or uprooted by settlers, in addition to 2.5 million trees uprooted since 1967.
  • The overwhelming majority of complaints filed against settler violence pass without any punishment of the perpetrators.
Home Demolitions
While building homes for settlers, Israel employs a policy of home demolitions to restrict the expansion of Palestinian communities on the pretext that homes were built without necessary permits, while refusing to issue them.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
A Palestinian girl cries as she walks past her family’s house after it was demolished by Israeli bulldozers in Om Ajaj village, north of the occupied West Bank city of Jericho Source: [REUTERS/Abed Omar Qusini]
  • Since 1967, Israeli authorities have demolished over 27,000 Palestinian homes in the occupied territory.
  • Between 2000 and 2007, Israeli authorities rejected more than 94 percent of permit requests in Area C.
  • Demolitions of homes and other structures that forcibly displace Palestinians may amount to war crimes.

Originally published by Al-Jazeera, 11.21.2017.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZOnGpquYgE

Abraham Léon - La Conception matérialiste de la question juive

Published on 17 Aug 2019
Disponible sur Kontre Kulture : http://www.kontrekulture.com/produit/...
 
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Shlomo Sand.jpg
 Shlomo Sand (pronounced Zand; Hebrew: שלמה זנד; born 10 September 1946) is an Israeli Emeritus Professor of History at Tel Aviv University.
 
Gilad Atzmon (Hebrew: גלעד עצמון, [ɡiˈlad at͡sˈmon]; born 9 June 1963) is a British jazz saxophonist, novelist, political activist, and writer.



BHARAT ISRAEL - MUSLIMS, CHRISTIANS, LOW CASTES, CHANT PRAISE LORD RAAM OR DIE!

"It's like they are trying to erase us — erase all of my people," says Jaibuna, the widow of Pehlu Khan. The 55-year-old Muslim man was beaten to death in 2017 by Hindu men who objected to his transporting cows.
Furkan Latif Khan/NPR 
 

'This Is It. I'm Going To Die': India's Minorities Are Targeted In Lynchings

Last year, a long-distance truck driver, Mohammad Hashim, was hauling a load of refrigerators out of New Delhi when a dozen strangers on motorbikes forced him off the road.
They pulled him out of his truck and demanded he open the back. They wanted to see if Hashim was transporting cows or beef — which is illegal in many Indian states, because cows are sacred in Hinduism, the majority religion in India.
"But I'm just the driver, and I'm not allowed to open the back of the truck. It was locked," Hashim, 45, recalls. "So they pulled on my beard and tried to force me to chant 'Jai Shri Ram.'"

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Long-distance truck driver Mohammad Hashim, 45, survived an attack by a Hindu mob last year. A dozen men on motorbikes forced him off the road and beat him. He suffered a broken leg and fractured vertebrae.
Furkan Latif Khan/NPR 
 
That slogan — which means "Praise Lord Ram," a Hindu god — has long been known as a prayer. Now it's an incitement to mob violence against India's minorities.
Hashim, a Muslim, refused to chant in praise of a Hindu god. So the men started beating him.
"I thought, 'This is it. I'm going to die,'" he recalls. "Then I went unconscious."
A surge in lynchings
Since the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party won power in India five years ago, lynchings of the country's minorities have surged. In February, Human Rights Watch reported at least 44 such murders between May 2015 and December 2018. Hundreds more people have been injured in religiously motivated attacks.
Most of the victims are Muslims, members of the country's largest religious minority. They comprise about 15% of India's 1.3 billion people. Other victims include lower-caste Hindus and Christians.

Most of the attackers are devout Hindu men, known as "cow vigilantes,"who take it upon themselves to enforce beef bans. Some of them claim ties to the BJP. Last year, a BJP minister met with a group of men convicted of a lynching and draped them in flower garlands.

After Prime Minister Narendra Modi won a second term in a landslide victory in May, a new parliament was sworn in, dominated by his BJP. As opposition lawmakers, particularly one Muslim politician, recited the oath of office, some BJP lawmakers taunted them with chants of "Jai Shri Ram."
Last month, a BJP state minister was filmed heckling a Muslim lawmaker and trying to force him to chant "Jai Shri Ram" outside the Jharkhand state assembly.
In an April report, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom condemned what it called the Indian government's "allowance and encouragement of mob violence against religious minorities." In June, after a lynching in Jharkhand, the U.S. commission called on the Indian government to "take concrete actions that will prevent this kind of violence and intimidation."

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Mohamed Irshad, 27, was with his brother and his father, Pehlu Khan, when they were attacked by a Hindu mob in 2017. "My brother and I barely survived — and all of India saw what happened to our father," he says. The attackers posted a video of their assault on social media in which Khan, his white tunic splattered with blood, pleads for his life, calling his attackers "brother."
Furkan Latif Khan/NPR 
 
Article 15 of India's constitution prohibits discrimination based on religion. Human rights groups are lobbying for the creation of a specific hate crimes law, but none exists in India yet.
"It's like they are trying to erase us"
One of India's most infamous recent lynching cases was that of Pehlu Khan, 55, a Muslim dairy farmer from Haryana state.
In April 2017, Khan and his two sons were driving home from a cattle fair in neighboring Rajasthan, with two cows and two calves in the back of their truck, when strangers on motorcycles surrounded them.
"I showed them receipts for the cows we'd bought, but they tore them up — and started beating us with hockey sticks," says Khan's son Mohamed Irshad, 27. "I suffered internal bleeding. My brother and I barely survived — and all of India saw what happened to our father."
That's because the attackers themselves recorded a video of their assault and posted it on social media. In a two-minute clip, the men praise Hindu gods as they punch and kick Khan. His white tunic splattered with blood, the father of eight pleads for his life, calling his attackers "brother."
That graphic video is how Khan's widow Jaibuna, who goes by one name, learned of her husband's death. She was waiting for him to return home from the cattle fair when a neighbor ran up and showed her the clip on his cell phone.
"People were saying, 'Don't show her, this is her family!'" recalls Jaibuna, who is in her mid-40s but doesn't know her exact age. "Everyone was panicking, and I couldn't take it. I fainted."
Before he died, Khan was able to describe his attackers to police. Six men were arrested. Charges against them were dropped, then reinstated, and the case remained in limbo for two years — until last week, when a court acquitted all of them, citing lack of evidence.
Instead, Khan was charged posthumously with cow smuggling. Police say he didn't have a permit to transport cows across state lines. Khan's two sons, who were with him that day, await trial — and if convicted, face the possibility of up to five years in prison.
"It's like they are trying to erase us — erase all of my people," Jaibuna says in the muddy courtyard of their family farm.
The family has sold off their cattle, to avoid further attacks. They're frightened. A sole buffalo remains on their farm, along with some chickens.
Former BJP lawmaker Gyan Dev Ahuja, who represented the Rajasthan district where Khan was murdered, has said he has "no regret over his death." He called Khan a "sinner."
A lack of public outcry
Videos of religiously motivated attacks in India like the one that killed Khan continue to go viral. There's a new clip on social media practically every week.
But prosecutions — of the attackers, at least — are rare. So is public outrage.
"How does a majority stay silent and witness something, unless you believe that what's happening is the right thing?" asks author Rana Ayyub, who went undercover to write a book about the BJP's role in anti-Muslim riots in Modi's home state of Gujarat, where Modi served as chief minister before becoming prime minister.
The lack of public outcry over the surge in lynchings shows that India's Hindu majority tacitly supports not murder, Ayyub says, but some discrimination against Muslims.
Some Indian analysts say the situation in India is comparable to the post-Civil War period in the United States, when many white people looked on as black people were lynched.
"The similarities with the American lynchings of the late 19th century are striking," says Prabhir Vishnu Poruthiyil, a business professor at the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay who has studied corporate India's lack of response to hate crimes.
"Most of the upper-middle class that populate[s] the corporate classes, they're also upper-caste Hindus," Poruthiyil explains. "Even if they don't agree with the lynching itself, they might be OK with the idea of stopping cow slaughter. It's a slippery slope."
As a child in Mumbai, Ayyub survived Hindu-Muslim riots in 1992 and 1993, which killed several hundred people. But she says what's happening now feels worse, because it's not a "spur of the moment" outpouring of anger. There are very specific targets.
"Now lynchings are organized on social media," Ayyub says. "People send messages to each other, saying, 'Hey, this household has beef in their fridge, let's go attack them."
She says India's Muslims increasingly perceive such attacks as being against them, rather than in defense of cows and Hindu customs. The repercussions could be dangerous, Ayyub warns. She's worried that Muslims are being alienated as Hindu nationalists revise mainstream Indian norms along Hindu lines.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Relatives of Mohammad Hashim, a lynching survivor, gather at the family's home in Haryana, India.
Lauren Frayer/NPR
"When you try to stifle a community, when you try to put them down, when you try to make them secondary citizens, their anger will burst on the streets," Ayyub says. "That's how you radicalize people."
Offering help
There is a small, fledgling movement of Indians — Muslims and Hindus — working to fight hate crimes and help victims.
In donated office space in New Delhi, four cellphones are lined up on a desk. When one line is busy, the next one rings. This is the headquarters of a new hate crimes helpline, created by United Against Hate, a network of volunteers. Organizers say they've received 15,000 phone calls since launching in July.
Callers "are very upset. They are very worried and say, 'We are in a difficult position,'" says dispatcher Jagisha Arora. "One person called me and said, 'I'm at police station right now. Police are refusing to lodge a complaint. They are threatening us.'"
Arora, 26, logs details from each call in an Excel spreadsheet and connects callers to free legal aid in 100 different Indian cities.
But from time to time, she also gets a different type of call — from people who are angry that this helpline even exists.
"Some people call to complain, like, 'Why are you spreading this?' They accuse me and say Muslims are bad," she says, shaking her head.
Fears persist
Hashim, the truck driver, survived his lynching on the highway outside New Delhi. After the attack, he was bedridden for six months with a broken leg and fractured vertebrae.
He can't read or write, so his supervisor at the trucking company — a Hindu — helped him file a police report. Nothing has come of it.
Now it's time for Hashim to get back on the road. He needs to provide for his five children.
"My children say, 'Don't worry about us, Daddy. We can stay poor. We'll eat less. We want you to be safe,'" Hashim says.
They're scared that next time, their father might not come home.
NPR producers Furkan Latif Khan and Sushmita Pathak contributed to this report.

MUBAHALA AND MUHAMMAD'S PEACE TREATY WITH ARABIAN CHRISTIANS OF NAJRAN

MARK GLENN, KENNETH O'KEEFE
 AT HIS HOME IN IDAHO, USA.
THE UGLY TRUTH - THE CRESCENT & CROSS



Dear MIKE
Of course, you know how History lies.  But, the lies continue and they are doing more and more damages in all societies and destroy the lives of hundreds of millions.  You know that too.  I was just reading "THE MYTH OF "THE SPANISH INQUISITION"you just posted.  As usual, your articles are very inspiring, although I just had a quick look at it.  Most of the time I go by the title and headlines.  My perspective will always remain also Islamic because I am a Christic Muslim (although unlike most vocal Muslims). It cannot be disputed that Muslims ruled Spain for some 700 years and produced a great Christian-Muslim-Jewish  civilisation that spread to Europe.   

"Allah's Sun Shines over the West (Occident)" 1997 by the "NAZI" Sigrid Hunke. Unfortunately, those damn Muslims never had the intelligence to translate this remarkable German work into English, to my knowledge!  Most of them do not even know much about their own religion and History anyway.

"Le Soleil d'Allah brille sur l'Occident" 1997

https://ia801209.us.archive.org/19/items/LeSoleilDAllah/le%20soleil%20d%27Allah.pdf

True Muslims will never convert to any other religion out of fear "Moriscos".  A pork-eating Muslim?   They will emigrate if the pressure is unbearable or go back to Africa, and in those days there was free circulation in all directions!  But, many Jews would convert and remain Jews! What the Christian rulers did to the Muslims in Spain was "ethnic cleansing" and they had no excuse, but this had nothing to do with either Christ or true Christians!  How many hundreds of thousands of Native Spaniards had embraced Islam out of their own free will? But, modern Muslims are for the most part not even Muslims especially among the rabble or those in authority! They too became decadent, the Arabs and the Ottomans, for example.  How many hundreds of millions of decadent Christians we see today calling themselves Zionist? The entire West is ruled by the Judaics, Crypto-Jews, "conversos" or "marranos". 

Christian Spain did not go to the Americas by accident or without the help of Spanish Muslim-Christian-Jewish navigational achievements! Their alphabet was even cursive Arabic, I read somewhere!  I repeat, they should be ashamed for what they did to the Spanish Muslims who were FULLY SPANIARDS OR IBERIANS AFTER 700 YEARS!  As for the Jews, as soon as they land in any Western country today they immediately claim to be more European than the natives!  The life secretary of the French Academy was Jewish, Maurice Druon.  The Archbishop of Paris was born a Jew, lived as a Jew, and died a Jew, Cardinal Jean-Marie Lustiger, in his own words before he died.   All Western political leaders need the blessings of Zionist Jews, Zionist Jewish power, Zionist Jewish Lobbies, and Apartheid Israel before they can assume power!  France is ruled by the Zionist Judaics and their Lobbies including Apartheid Israel, including all US Presidents after JFK!  The Board of Deputies of British Jews run the British government and the Royals with the Rothschilds.

Regards
With Christic Love
Basheer
Sunday 1st of September 2019


Compiled for MIKE KING
BAFS - Sunday 1st of September 2019

The Prophet’s Treaty with the Christians of Najran: An Analytical Study to Determine the Authenticity of the Covenants
Journal of Islamic Studies, Volume 27, Issue 3, September 2016, Pages 273–354, https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etw027
Published: 20 July 2016

Abstract
The covenants established by the Prophet with the various Christian communities of his time have recently been documented by Dr. John Andrew Morrow in his book The Covenants of the Prophet Muhammad with the Christians of the World. Morrow brought these covenants together from obscure monasteries, collections and out of print books, arguing against the accepted understanding that these are forgeries. The Prophet’s interaction with the Christians of Najrān is well documented in the Islamic sources, as well as in The Chronicle of Seert, an ecclesiastical history of the Assyrian Church of the East. Yet, no close study of the similarities and differences of the Prophet’s encounter with them has been done, nor comparison of the Islamic sources with what has been related in the Covenant with the Christians of Najran and its Exordium. Doing so provides greater clarity not only in determining the authenticity and authority of the covenants but also in assessing the reliability of the Islamic historical source material. In this paper, a cross-comparison of all the covenants now available is undertaken using source-critical methods. Thereafter, it is argued that categorical dismissal of the covenants as forgeries is no longer tenable. We may then join Charles Upton who, in the Foreword to Morrow’s book, remarked that ‘we may in fact be witnessing—unexpectedly, miraculously, at this extremely late date—the emergence of a third foundational source for Islam’ after the Qurʾān and the ḥadīth.
"Surely the case of Jesus is like the case of Adam. He created him out of dust, then he said to him, "Be', and he was. This is the truth from thy Lord, so be thou not of those who doubt. Now whoso disputes with thee concerning him, after what has come to thee of Knowledge, say to him "Come let us call abnāʾanā (Arabic: أَبْنَاءَنَا‎, our sons) and abnāʾakum (Arabic: أَبْنَاءَكُم‎, your sons) and nisāʾanā (Arabic: نِسَاءَنَا‎, our women) and nisāʾkum (Arabic: نِسَاءَكُم‎, your women) and anfusanā (Arabic: أَنْفُسَنَا‎, ourselves) and anfusakum (Arabic: أَنْفُسَكُم‎, yourselves), then let us pray fervently and invoke the curse of Allah on those who lie."
Quran, 3:59-61

Prophet's Covenant to the Christians of Najran

Clark Atlanta University
Alumnus
Writer, published author, editor and translator of 83 works

PROPHET'S COVENANT TO THE CHRISTIANS OF NAJRAN
 By Yasin T. al-Jibouri
To view a partial list (3 pages) of al-Jibouri’s books which Amazon is marketing, please click on this Link:


This text is excerpted from my recently published Volume Two of 
 Allah: The Concept of God in Islam. It follows a discussion of the Mubahala.


WIKIPEDIA (added by me BAFS)
"The term 'mubahala' can also mean withdrawing mercy from one who lies or engages in falsehood. In the Quran, al-mubahala (invocation of God's curse) was mentioned as a decisive solution to the dispute over Jesus between the Christians of Najran and Muhammad."

You are at liberty to reproduce it in any way or form, but if you post it on your web site, please indicate your source. Some brothers are still sticking to their habit of claiming authorship of some of my works, and this is unbecoming of any good Muslim. You can order your copy of this Volume and/or copies of other works Online if you click on this


This text is very important in the light of the fierce attack on Islam by some ignorant or misled fanatical Christians and Jews. It reflects Islam’s tolerance in the most glorious way; so, it deserves your attention and dissemination.

TEXT OF THE PROPHET'S COVENANT
Following the agreement reached at the end of the Mubahala, the Prophet decided to write a covenant to regulate the relationship between the Muslims and the Christians so it would remain valid for all time to come. This covenant is very important because it reflects Islam's respect for other religions, something which many Muslims nowadays need to learn, particularly the fanatical Wahhabis and Salafis of the world who are funded and supported by Saudi Arabia and all Gulf countries. These Wahhabis and Salafis have given the world the worst impression about Islam.

In the Name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful 

This is a security document from Allah and His Messenger to those who have been given the Book (Bible) from among the Christians, those who follow the Creed of Najran and whoever follows the beliefs of Christianity written to them by Muhammad son of Abdullah, the Messenger of Allah to all people, a covenant to them from Allah and His Messenger. It is a covenant which is entrusted to the Muslims after him (after the Prophet's demise) and which they must comprehend, recognize and safeguard for them. Neither a ruler nor any man who is strengthened by the authority of a ruler has the right to revoke it, nor to replace it with something else, nor to over-burden the believers (Muslims) with anything other than the terms stated in this document. Anyone who safeguards it, observes it and fulfils its contents is surely on the straightforward covenant and is loyal to his commitment to the Messenger of Allah. And anyone who reneges on it or changes it to something else or substitutes it with something else shall bear the burden of his sin, and he is one who betrays the trust of Allah, who reneges on his pledge, who disobeys Him and disobeys His Messenger, and he is counted by Allah among the liars.

(1) Ali al-Ahmadi al-Mayanji, Makateeb al-Rasool (letters of the Prophet), Dar al-Hadith Press (Tehran, Iran), first ed., 1998, pp. 172-176. More details are compiled and provided by Muhammed Hameed-Allah in his collection of documents from the Prophet's era and from that of the first four caliphs which Dar al-Nafa'is (house of precious items) in BeirutLebanon, published in 1987 (6th edition).



FIRST:
That I protect them—the Christians—and defend them, their churches, places of worship, places of their prayers, places of the monks, the (sacred) areas which they tour wherever they may be in a mountain or a valley or a cave or a city or a plain or a sandy track.

SECOND:
That I guard their religion and their faith wherever they may be, on dry land or on a sea, east or west, with whatever I guard my own self and whatever belongs to me and the followers of Islam from my creed.

THIRD:
That I include them in my trust, in my covenant, in my security against any harm or anything shunned or any burden or any responsibility, and that I shall be behind them to protect them from any enemy that intends to harm me and their own selves, to do so with my own self, with my supporters, with my followers, with the people who follow my creed.

FOURTH:
That I keep away from them any harm of burdens which people who perform
 jihad bear, from any assault or khiraj (land tax) other than what they willingly pay without being forced or coerced into doing any such thing.

FIFTH:
That I do not remove a bishop from his bishopric, nor a monk from his monastery, nor a pilgrim from his pilgrimage, nor demolish any of their churches, nor let any construction of a mosque infringe on their own buildings, nor should any house of the Muslims do so; anyone who does any of these things reneges from his covenant with Allah, disobeys His Messenger and swerves from the covenant of Allah.

SIXTH:
Neither a monk nor a bishop, nor any of them who worships or wears woollen clothes or seeks solitude in the mountains or in areas that are isolated from cities should ever be required to pay any jizya 4(protection tax) or khiraj.

SEVENTH:
Whoever follows the Christian faith must not be forced into becoming a Muslim; mercy must be spread for them and anything harmful must be kept away from them wherever they may be in the land.

 EIGHTH:
If any Christian commits a crime or a serious offense, the Muslims must help him, prevent harm from reaching him, protect him and not let him bear the brunt of what he commits; rather, reconciliation must be established between him and his victim: He must either be pardoned or ransom is paid on his behalf.

NINETH:
They (Christians) must not be rejected, betrayed or neglected because I have given them Allah's covenant that they should have what the Muslims have and be obligated to the Muslims' obligations.

TENTH:
Muslims must carry out their obligations towards the pact which the covenant obligates; they should protect sanctities, and they should keep away every harm from them (Christians) so they may become partners with the Muslims: They have what the Muslims have and are obligated to what the Muslims are obligated.

ELEVENTH:
They may, if they need repairs to their churches and places of worship or anything related to their interests and creed, get assistance from the Muslims to make such repairs; they must be assisted, and this must not be regarded as a debt against them but as support in the interest of their religion and as the fulfilment of the covenant of the Messenger of Allah, as a gift to them and a boon from Allah and His Messenger to them.

This reflects how much tolerance Islam has towards other creeds and belies those who advocate the killing of non-Muslims under this pretext or that. This text shows you the pristine beauty of Islam and the Prophet's self-confidence and deep conviction. It is a charter of human rights the like of which is seldom found anywhere.

 
PEOPLE OF YEMEN EMBRACE ISLAM

In Tabari's Tarikh, it is stated that during the 10th year of Hijra (631A.D.), the Prophet (P) sent Ali (as) to Yemen. Prior to that, he had sent Khalid ibn al-Walid in order to call the people of Yemen to Islam, but nobody accepted it.

Then the Prophet (P) sent Ali (as) and authorized him that he might, if he so desired, dismiss Khalid or anyone else from his party. So, Ali (as) went to Yemen and read the Prophet's statement to the people there. As a result, in one day, all members of the clan of Hamadanwere converted to Islam. Ali (as)
informed the Prophet (P) of this success whereupon the Prophet (P) said, "Peace with the Hamdanites!" Thereafter, all Yemenites entered into the folds of Islam. Ali (as) again informed the Prophet (P) of the progress which he had made. The Prophet(P) was so over-joyed, he offered a sajda (prostration) to thank Allah. During this year, the Prophet (P) deputed Ali (as) to go to receive the  jizya
from the Najranites. Ali obeyed the orders and joined the Prophet only during the Farewell Pilgrimage. It was on the 25th of Dhul-Qi`dah/February 25, 632 A.D. that the Prophet left Medina for hajj.

Wassalamu Alaykum.

P.S. As the truth is often mixed with untruth or outright lies, THE SPIRIT behind those texts cannot be a lie!  Islam has a unique position among world religions.  It is the only religion with a language that survived in its original form as a spoken language for over 1400 years, and hundreds of millions of Muslims around the world know the entire text by heart, from very young to very old.  It remains the only religion that includes Judaism and Christianity (in their original Holy Texts), whereas Judaism excludes both Christianity and Islam, and Christianity excludes both Judaism (by making up a New Covenant) and Islam. As James A. Michener rightly puts it, "Islam the Misunderstood Religion"!    

Both Judaism and Christianism (not Christianity) are Arab religions.  Muhammad was married to a Christian widow 15 years older than him.  It was her Christian uncle who announced to him that he was the Advocate, Helper, Counsellor, Comforter, they were awaiting as promised by Jesus.  As he never came, they called him the Holy Spirit that was already in all of us when Jesus said: "Unless I go away, the Advocate (paráklētos) will not come to you!" But, his original word is not known at all.  For the Muslims like  David Benjamin Keldani (1928), the original Greek word used was periklytos, the praised one, illustrious, famed, praiseworthy, that is, AHMAD. 

The word is rendered in Hebrew as MAHAMADDIMin Solomon 5:16. and as MAHAMADAin the Hindu Scriptures.  And this fits MUHAMMAD perfectly!



ADDENDUM



Sorry, I made a mistake in the spelling of the name LUSTIGER .
The Antichrists met to thank the Ashkenazi Jew, Catholic Cardinal and Archbishop of Paris Aaron Jean-Marie Lustiger (the Devil in disguise) for having successfully infiltrated the Catholic establishment with the complicity of the Zionist Pope, and fooled the Christians again, and for having convinced the French Catholics that they were all Jews.

 Lustiger preached that all Catholics were Jews and this was echoed in all the Catholic churches throughout France. He said that although he had converted to Catholicism he had remained a faithful and true Jew all along! If this is not proof of degeneracy and treachery within the Catholic Church and that Jews had taken over the Vatican, I do not know what is! Lustiger’s epitaph, which he wrote himself in 2004, reads:

 “I was born Jewish.
I received the name
Of my paternal grandfather Aaron
Having become Christian
by faith and by baptism,
I have remained Jewish
as did the Apostles.
I have as my Patron Saints
Aaron the High Priest,
Saint John the Apostle,
Holy Mary full of grace.
Named 139th archbishop of Paris
by His Holiness Pope John Paul II,
I was enthroned
in this cathedral
on 27 February 1981,
Then, I exercised here my entire ministry.
Passers-by, pray for me.
 † Aron Jean-Marie Cardinal Lustiger
Archbishop of Paris

The ‘Crypto’ Jew Lustiger was able to fool nearly one billion Catholics (or what remained of them), but not people like me.  He broke with the French Tradition of its intolerant religion called laïcité, and accepted being made an honorary canon ( chanoine ) of the Saint-John of Latran Basilic in Rome on Thursday 20 December 2007.







  Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
http://www.historiarex.com/uploads/files/1410746887.jpg
 


THE MYTH OF "THE SPANISH INQUISITION"

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
By Mike King
 




.
"All The News That Sulzberger's  Propaganda Rag  SawFit To Distort"
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
A Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,
Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines
___________________________________________________________________
          FREE SAMPLE  1 FED RESERVE NOTE
___________________________________________________________________

"We read and rebut their vile crap so you won't have to!"
*****************************************

 FREE SAMPLE DAY

Subscribe to the Anti-New York Times and stay on top of world events.



Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Leonard Milberg, who collects Judaica and Irish poetry, viewing a display containing the 16th-century manuscript by Luis de Carvajal the Younger at the New-York Historical Society.
NY Times:A Secret Jew, the New World, a Lost Book: Mystery Solved
REBUTTAL BY
Long before the phony "Holocaust" of the 20th Century; and long before the phony "pogroms" of the 19th Century, there was the real but totally misrepresented and exaggerated "Spanish Inquisition" -- which commenced in 1478 and remained in effect until 1874. Officially known as the Tribunal of the Holy Office of the Inquisition, the policy was established by "anti-Semitic" Catholic Monarchs Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile for the usual purpose of containing the usual bad behavior of the usual suspects (you know -- ritual child killing, well poisoning, coin clipping, money lending abuse, unethical business practices, disrespect of Christianity, revolutionary activities ---- that sort of stuff).
Owing to the fact that (((they))) control the media, academia and Hollyweird, the Inquisition is generally misunderstood as a historical case of "intolerant" Christians forcing the ever-innocent-ones to convert to Catholicism under threat of torture or death at the hands of the Inquisitor. That's not exactly the case -- actually, that is not at all the case -- and this NY Slimes article, albeit inadvertently, refutes the popular misconception. Let's dive in.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
http://www.historiarex.com/uploads/files/1410746887.jpg
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
http://rationalwiki.org/w/images/0/05/NOBODY_EXPECTS_THE_SPANISH_INQUISITION!.jpg
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image result for SPANISH INQUISITION
Ferdinand, Isabella and the Catholic Church have been scorned and mocked for initiating the Inquisition. But is what we have been taught about this period in European history actually true?

The article opens:
"It is perhaps the most significant artifact documenting the arrival of Jews in the New World: a small, tattered 16th-century manuscript written in an almost microscopic hand by Luis de Carvajal the Younger, the man whose life and pain it chronicled.
Until 1932, the 180-page booklet by de Carvajal, a secret Jew who was burned at the stake by the Inquisition in Spain’s colony of Mexico, resided in that country’s National Archives."

A "secret Jew," eh? That sure sounds like a "conspiracy theory", doesn't it?
You see, boys and girls, once upon a time in Catholic Spain, the chosenites were taking over the joint, particularly in matters pertaining to commerce and money (There's a real shocker, eh?). Compounding the problem was the fact that so many of them, for purposes of career advancement, had pretended to convert to Catholicism (they were not forced converts) while secretly remaining true to Judaism. And finally, to compound their dirty deeds even more, some of them aggressively proselytized Catholics to convert to Judaism.
These generally olive-skinned and black-haired Sephardic "secret Jews" -- referred to as "conversos" or "marranos" -- made common cause with their Moorish Muslim cousins who had also overstayed their welcome in the parts of Spain which they had earlier conquered. Cleansing Spain of the North African Moors was relatively easy, but digging out the insincere secret "marranos" was challenging. In a certain sense, the Inquisition was very similar to latter day HUAC & McCarthy mole hunts aimed at cleaning out communists.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image result for marrano jew book
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
http://i.forbesimg.com/media/lists/people/sonia-sotomayor_416x416.jpg
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image result for marco rubio
Marrano Jews chose to flout the laws and disrespect the hospitality of their Spanish hosts. Many who arrived in the New World continued the charade for generations. Probable marranos (and homosexuals): Puerto Rican Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor (Meyer) and Cuban Senator from Florida Marco Rubio (Ruby).

More from the article:
"De Carvajal was a Jew who posed as Catholic in New Spain, now Mexico, during a period when the Inquisition ruthlessly persecuted heretics and false converts..."

"False converts," eh? So, poor Mr. De Carvajal, more than 100 years into the Inquisition regime, still chose to scam and disrespect the Spaniards. Why feel sorry for him? Imagine 1000's of false converts to Judaism trying to weasel their way into privileged status in "the State of Israel."  How aggressively would the Mossad smoke them out and even kill them? Hmmmm? Heck, your reporter here once knew a Gentile New Jersey girl who was engaged to marry a chosenite who wanted to live in Israel. The Israeli bureaucrats put the young couple through the ringer, before finally granting her permission to live in Israel with her husband-to-be, but only if she converted to Judaism and allowed the state to tell her where she could or couldn't work. When she refused the kosher conditions of this Israeli Inquisition, her Jew fiance dumped her!
Not only does the ongoing Israeli Inquisition deny normal citizenship rights and privileges to converts to Gentiles married to Jews; the shitty little state even openly discriminates against ethnic Jews who truly embrace Christianity!

Headline: New York Times: (December 27, 1989)
Israeli Court Rules Jews for Jesus Cannot Automatically Be Citizens
(Here)
How's that for "tolerance ?"

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image result for cross fingers behind back
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image result for jews for jesus
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Related image
1. Spain had a problem with "false converts" with false loyalty taking false vows acquiring undue influence and power. // 2 &3. Who's guilty of an "Inquisition?" --- "Jews for Jesus" get abused in Jew York City -- Imagine what (((they))) would do to them in Tel Aviv?

Another excerpt from the article:
"De Carvajal, a trader, was arrested around 1590 as a proselytizing Jew."
You see that?  Not only was he a phony convert, but he proselytized (recruited Catholics to Judaism) --- something that modern day Israel will throw you in jail for! Mr. D brought the law down upon himself.
One more:
"He was freed for a time — possibly so that the authorities could track his contacts with other secret Jews."
Translation: They mercifully let him free --- and he went back to playing his games with other fraudsters.
The Spanish Inquisition supported royal decrees issued in 1492 and 1502 ordering troublesome Jews (and Moors) to convert or leave Spain. Their country, their rules -- just as was the case with the aforementioned Jersey girl! Though the Inquisition is almost always portrayed in popular literature and history as an example of Catholic "intolerance"TM and "oppression", more than a few "respectable" modern historians now openly question previous accounts regarding the severity of the Inquisition. (This will probably begin to happen with the Holohoax within the next 50 years.)
Noted British-Burmese historian Henry Kamen boldly declares that the 'myth' of the pervasive, torture-mad inquisition is an invention of 19th century Protestant authors (financed by Jews, perhaps?) with an agenda to discredit the Catholic Church. Over the 350 year period that the Inquisition was in effect throughout the empire, about 150,000 persons (average of 428 per year) were charged with crimes and only about 3,000 (10 per year) were executed. Kamen also reveals that many suspects were just questioned and released unharmed, and torture was used very rarely and only in certain serious cases.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image result for henry kamen
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/61kAuwWxwhL._UY250_.jpg
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
https://images-eu.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51dRjvi3ZGL._UY250_.jpg
After plowing through reams and reams of original source documents, historian Henry Kamen and others have long since set the record straight about the Spanish Inquisition. Though most modern day academics now know the true version of events, the public at large still misunderstands the history.
"One of the most important living historians of Spain, Kamen has devoted his career, most famously in his revisionist books on Philip II and on the Spanish Inquisition, to taking on the so-called Black Legend, promoted by Spain's opponents. That he has in many ways succeeded, thanks to decades of engaged scholarship, in fundamentally altering historians' understanding of 15th- and 16th-century Spain is testimony to the force of his arguments and the depth and quality of his rigorous, archive-based research."
— The Atlantic Monthly (Boston), 2012
Considering the depth of the treason  infestation problem that Spain faced both at home and in its New World colonies, the 300 year mole hunt wasn't anywhere near as harsh as people believe it to be. Nonetheless, the truth about the Inquisition didn't stop the libtarded government of Spain, in 2015, from granting full citizenship rights (replete with all the "free" stuff that the Marxists of Madrid hand out to the masses) to the scattered "descendants" of Spanish Jews. (here)
 
Dios mio and "oy vey!" This world has gone mad.
 
 
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l5pba8e19E1qbj01p.png
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/007/617/jew_basic.jpg
 I know, Isabella ... yo lo se.


Boobus Americanus 1: I read in today's New York Times today about recently discovered documents belonging to a Mexican Jew who was tortured and executed during the era of the Spanish Inquisition.
Boobus Americanus 2:Since time immemorial, the Jews have suffered and endured so much persecution.

   Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Drag to pan
Sugar:  Waaaa! Waaaa! Waaaa! It's alwayss the other guy'ss fault, eh Boobuss? You frickin' clod! 
 Editor: More than 100 historical expulsions had to have had a reason behind them.

 Mark Glenn, from The Crescent and Cross Solidarity movement:‘Israel threatened to take down world in nuclear Armageddon’.
(PTV).In a Friday interview, Mark Glenn, from The Crescent and Cross Solidarity movement, lashed out at Israel for its nuclear stockpile, sayingTel Aviv is the only regime that “has threatened to take the entire world down in a nuclear Armageddon in the instance that her precious experiments in Jewish self-rule in the Middle East ceases to materialize.” 

 “There is no other country in existence today that has basically told the entire world that if we are going to go down we are going to take the rest of the world down with us,” he added. 

Even Israel’s most prominent military professor, Martin Van Creveld, has once alluded to such nuclear ambitions by Israel and confirmed that Tel Aviv has several hundred atomic warheads and rockets targeted at all directions -- mostly at European capitals -- and that Tel Aviv is ready to take the entire world down before the regime itself ceases to exist, Glenn pointed out. The analyst expressed regret that the nuclear threat from Israel looms over the world, while Tel Aviv continues to use its mainstream media outlets to level allegations against other countries, accusing them of possessing non-civilian nuclear programs. 

Israel is widely believed to be the sole possessor of nuclear weapons in the Middle East. Tel Aviv began building its first plutonium and uranium processing facility, Dimona, in the Negev desert in 1958. 

Former US President Jimmy Carter has stated that Israel has a nuclear arsenal that includes between 200 and 300 warheads. Decades of recurrent reporting and aerial footage have also established the possession of atomic arms by Israel. Under its official policy of nuclear ambiguity, Tel Aviv neither confirms nor denies the possession of nukes and refuses to join the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) or allow inspections of its nuclear facilities.

Read the full story here.[unavailable]


Israel, We Bless Thee

November 9, 2006

Today, while driving through town, I wound up behind a minivan that had a big sticker on the back. The sticker had an Israeli flag in the middle of it, and under it the quotation from the book of Genesis that reads “I will bless those who bless thee.”

I would like to take this time to list my own reasons for thanking and blessing Israel, our lone ally in the Middle East, for everything she has done for us, since I am quite sure most Americans are unaware of just what kind of friend she has been to us.

For extorting from me and my fellow Americans $4,000,000,000.00 a year for the last 4 decades, we bless thee.

For taking our most sophisticated weapons technology and stealing it for yourself without paying the American patent holders, we bless thee.

For taking that high-tech military technology and selling it to our enemies, such as the Russians and Chinese, thus further endangering us, we bless thee.

For using that weaponry in a sustained attack against a United States ship, the USS Liberty, in an attempt to sink her, thus preventing US servicemen from revealing to the rest of the world information concerning the war crimes they witnessed you commit against Egyptian soldiers in the Sinai Desert during the Six Day War, as well as for the purposes of dragging the US into yet another one of your murderous adventures, we bless thee.

For killing 35 and wounding 170 American sailors aboard the USS Liberty, we bless thee.
For bribing the United States government into covering it up, preventing any justice from being done for the benefit of the families of the lost sailors – as well as the American People, we bless thee.

For sending your agents into Egypt and blowing up American buildings for the purpose of blaming the Arabs in an event known as the Lavon Affair, we bless thee.

For sending your agents into Libya during the Reagan administration, and broadcasting radio messages in Arabic that were designed to sound like “terrorist cell planning” so that the US would initiate military strikes against Khadafi in an event known as Operation Trojan Horse, we bless thee.

For withholding information from us concerning the planned attacks against the US Marine barracks in Lebanon, attacks you knew about through your moles in the Islamic world and about which you deliberately refused to warn us in order to further your interests against the Arabs, we bless thee.

For employing Jonathon Pollard, an American serviceman paid to spy for Israel in order to steal even more of our National Security secrets for your parasitic purposes, we bless thee.

For blackmailing President Clinton through one of your sayanim, Monica Lewinsky, in order to prevent a coherent peace program from being pushed forward between yourself and the Palestinian people whom you have brutalized and murdered for the last 50 years, we bless thee.

For breaking every agreement you have made with your Arab neighbors, stealing their land, displacing, murdering, and treating them like the animals you see them as, we bless thee.

For using your agents within the first Bush administration to involve us in the first Gulf War, causing the deaths of American men and women, and exposing our servicemen to whatever bioweapons were and are responsible which have led to Gulf War Syndrome, we bless thee.

For your role in the September 11 attacks in this country, and for blackmailing and bribing the US government into deporting back to Israel the 100 or more intelligence agents that were arrested after the attacks, we bless thee.

For suppressing the information from the American people of your involvement in the September 11 attacks and sending us in the wrong direction in search of answers, we bless thee.

For using one of your agents in the US Army Weapons Lab to steal anthrax and distribute it into our mail system, terrorizing US citizens and killing several in order to blame the Arabs, we bless thee.

For using your agents in the US Government, namely, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, Abrams, and the rest into initiating this war in the Middle East so that you could bring to heel all the enemies you have made during the last 50 years, we bless thee.

For using your agents in the media to lie to us on a minute by minute basis about the war, lying to us as to how “just” this cause is, and what the real reasons behind it are, we bless thee.

For using your agents in the Christian Evangelical community, such as Falwell, Graham, Swaggert, Robertson and the rest who praise you as God’s chosen people and further keep Americans in the dark about who you really are what you have done, and what you are truly about, we bless thee.

For bringing idiots like Limbaugh, Liddy, Hannity, Beck, O’Reilly and Savage to the forefront as paid liars who will support you and further lead Americans astray, we bless thee.

For making America your attack dog, and for sending her sons and daughters to fight and die in all your future wars, we bless thee.

For using your influence in the media to hide the real statistics about the war, the dead and wounded on both sides, we bless thee.

For using us in such a way that not only further inflames the Arab world against us, but as well has succeeded in our alienating ourselves against those nations with whom we have been friendly for over a century, we bless thee.

And finally, for using your influence in our media and academia to flood our minds with pornography and lies, as well as inculcating in us a hatred for our history, religion, and culture, for dividing our nation between races and sexes, and for releasing into our society all of your plagues and filth that have left us a rotted out corpse of a once great nation, oh Israel, our friend,
 we bless thee.

2006 by Mark Glenn


 –Anyone interested in verification of some of the information contained in this piece should read either of ex-Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky’s books,  
‘By Way of Deception’ and  
‘The Other Side of Deception’ as well as ex-US Congressman Paul Findley’s books ‘Those Who Dare To Speak Out’ and  
‘Deliberate Deceptions’







 

THANK GOD, BRENDON O'CONNELL IS WELL, KICKING, TRUTHFUL, BUT SADLY BLINDED ALSO.

MY "UN REFUGEE" SON IS BLINDED BECAUSE HE STILL DOES NOT REALISE THAT HE IS NOT IMMORTAL!

Brenton Tarrant Chirstchurch Shooting- 49 dead


First published at 18:12 UTC on March 17th, 2019.
2302 subscribers
They took down Brendon's Vimeo channel but I captured this prior.
by Brendon O'Connell

The guy was clearly trained.
No if's, no buts.
He was cool as a cucumber.
He has done this before.
The way he would reload - step back in the narrow hallway so there was less chance of being jumped as he reloaded.
He is totally confident.
The video is very disturbing, especially the young Muslim woman on the ground in front of the Mosque whimpering "Help me! Help me!"He blew the top of her head off.

You do not handle an AR15, military-style semi-automatic assault rifle like that unless you have trained to clear jams and misfires in the efficient manner he displays. 

He darts back into cover, out of the expansive prayer hall into a narrow hallway to change magazines - this is not something you do naturally.

This is military training.

House clearing - to make it harder to be attacked while changing magazines.
It is impossible to obtain an AR15 style assault rifle in Australia.  

Even a well connected organised crime figure would have trouble and you would immediately risk being on the "police radar" if you tried.
So where did he train in their operation, tactics and handling?
He was not long in New Zealand.
He cannot buy firearms in New Zealand as an Australian citizen.
Who brought them for him?
Who supplied them?
It is legal to own the AR15 he used and semi-automatic shotguns with the appropriate hunting licenses.
Some claim his AR15 magazines were illegal 30 round.
In the dock, he looks 5ft 4inches. Muscular. He looks special forces - small and powerful. How they like them. Travelled extensively. Especially in Europe. Claimed he was a simple working class lad - made his money investing in crypto, ie: he's a drug dealer. Absolutely he is.

I knew a guy who worked security in Palestine when Arafat had casinos. 

He had no military training. He learned on the job. That's where I think that guy has come from. They claim he was in Pakistan, who knows. I just know what I saw in that video.
He espouses a multitude of this-and-that politics claiming communist then anarchist, then libertarian and now he is not sure BUT he mentioned Mao and he draws from Julius Evola and "Sacred Tradition" which was Hitler's favourite book and Steve Bannon's too. Even though drawing from pure National Socialist water wells, the word "Jew" or "Jewish" never leaves his lips.
He was playing Serbian folk music at one stage which the Chetniks would play as they fought the Croatian fascists.
What a grab bag. I smell Bi Bi Henry. Who benefits? BiBi is about to make his own shooting video in Syria.
Wag The Dog - "Change the story, change the lead, it's not a new concept."
LESS
CategoryNews & Politics
SensitivityNormal - Content that is suitable for ages 13+     

BitChute is funded by its community and promotes freedom of expression, please click here to support us.

 MY SON IS BLINDED BECAUSE HE STILL DOES NOT REALISE THAT HE IS NOT IMMORTAL!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRmRG-dfw9Q

New footage emerges of moments after Christchurch mosque massacre | ITV News

 Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Published on 19 Mar 2019

 ITV News has obtained new video taken moments after the shooting at the Linwood Mosque - one of two targeted in the Christchurch massacre. It shows one of the killer’s weapons – an assault rifle - discarded among the dead and the dying. Survivor Mohammed Imtihaz who filmed the video told ITV News "it was very scary".

New Zealand’s Cabinet has backed changes to gun laws in the country just three days after 50 people were killed in the shootings.

 Brenton Tarrant, a 28-year-old Australian, has been charged with murder and appeared at court on Saturday. He was remanded until April 5.




AL QUDS JERUSALEM THE HOLY LAND ETERNAL CAPITAL OF PALESTINE.


INHUMANS MADE ME HOMELESS 5 TIMES, BUT I ALWAYS HAD ONE QUARTER OF A CEILING OVER MY HEAD, HOWBEIT WITH BIG HARMA POISONS, AND GM MONSANTO FOOD POISONS GALORE!

I live in a society deprived of humanity where the Fanatic “Democratic” Totalitarian State (“Genocidal Racist, Secular, Socialist, Communist, Marxist, Liberal, Common Purpose, Freemasonic, Judean, Transgender, Homosexual, Satanic”, ...all in one!) is the biggest criminal wieldng degenerate power of the land!  
That same State kept me in an open prison for the past 20 years, and my own never understood what I suffered all those years without freedom while witnessing the daily satanic activities of Western Anti Civilisation! 
As for justice, I never encountered it in y entire life, God having been removed at the highest institutional levels of government!


The pain never stops, but soon I will be gone!  My only hope is that I will have left behind enough evidence of my humanity that will touch the hearts of my own, and make them aware that at least one of their own did in fact bravely and unrelentlessly stand up to oppression and tyranny all his adult life.  And, there are many like me, although not enough to make a difference!

My religion of always: FIGHTING for freedom, truth, justice, and the Moral Way!  A LOST BATTLE IN ADVANCE, BUT THE FIGHT MUST GO ON NO MATTER WHAT!

I THANK GOD, IT WAS NEVER ABOUT,ME, ME, ME!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIJB7cv97Dg
  
Zain 
Ramadan 2018 

 31,895,529 views

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Published on 16 May 2018

Agency: Joy Productions كلمات: هبه مشاري حماده الحان: بشار الشطي توزيع مكس وماستر: ربيع الصيداوي وتريات: اسماعيل تونش بلاك اخراج: سمير عبود


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsVt6-PgdNc
Published on 7 Mar 2017
 Nuno Rocha deals with the theme of homelessness.
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVfLc26Uies

Bulgarie : le marché aux épouses Roms | ARTE

Published on 22 May 2019
 [Disponible jusqu'au 07/08/2019] En Bulgarie, le premier endroit où se rend un Rom de la communauté kalaidzhi cherchant une femme, c’est au marché aux épouses situé près du monastère de Batchkovo. Depuis plusieurs générations, des jeunes filles roms y rencontrent leur futur mari. Les kalaidzhi – "rétameurs" en français – se marient exclusivement entre eux, excluant d’autres Roms et surtout les Bulgares. Dans cette tradition controversée, l’argent joue aussi un rôle. Si un homme trouve la femme de ses rêves, il doit faire une offre à ses parents. Le mariage ne pourra avoir lieu que si les deux parties se mettent d’accord sur un prix. Pour les jeunes kalaidzhi, le marché aux épouses constitue la seule possibilité de rencontrer un partenaire. La foi orthodoxe et les coutumes les empêchent de sortir, de flirter ou même d’avoir des relations avant le mariage. Mais de plus en plus de jeunes Roms se rebellent contre cet état de fait. Elles veulent décider elles-mêmes de leur destin, aimer et convoler quand bon leur semble. Surtout celles qui se marient à l'âge de 15 ans, pour qui cette union signifie la fin de leur autonomie, car une vie de mère au foyer les attend. Reportage complet (Allemagne, 2017, 30mn) #Roms#Bulgarie Abonnez-vous à la chaîne ARTE https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwI-... Suivez-nous sur les réseaux ! Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/artetvTwitter : http://www.twitter.com/artefrInstagram : https://www.instagram.com/artefr


GENOCIDAL RACIST AND SLAVE TRADING US AMERICA WAS NEVER GREAT AT ALL DESPITE ALL THE GREAT THINGS IT ACHIEVED!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPHSXUS0_1c

Why America isn't the greatest country in the world anymore.

 Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Published on 18 Sep 2012
The opening scene of HBO's "The Newsroom".
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ML3qYHWRIZk

The Most Honest Three Minutes In Television History

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Published on 1 Feb 2013


Brutally Honest trump supporter tells it like it is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra7dD... 
Take a moment and think about it. Remember it, Share it and maybe, just maybe, we can be great again! 
The point of this video? Not to create animosity nor give an audience to hateful statements from people who, because of their own apathy, in part created the world we now live.  
The point of this video is to make anyone who cares to pull together and stop the down fall as best as they can. To be good to one another and stop blaming everybody else for our own short comings. To heal ourselves so that we can heal others. Not as separate parts, but as a whole sum of Humanity! 
  This video has now been seen in 190+ countries! Still people don't seem to be getting the point.
I am a human being just as you. Doing things for the right reasons just as you. If you're not treating your fellow man (Mankind) (Human Beings) with compassion, or at least treating them as you would be treated, then how are you helping the situation. And if you're not helping the situation, then what are you doing? It's not about invisible lines that divide us rather human qualities that unite us. It's a lie to think your not good enough. 
There are two entities in the world. 
1. Evil This is where one feels Anger, Jealousy, Greed, Resentment, Lies, and Inferiority. (and SUPERIOR! BAFS)
2. Goodness This is where one feels Joy, Peace, Love, Hope, Humility, Kindness, Empathy and Truth. 
As I read over the comments I see both Evil and Goodness shared. It is not a country that is evil or good. Rather it is a personal choice of the people in any country to be either Good or Evil. And they do so through their actions.
THIS IS GREAT "MILLENIAL" AMERICA!
"MEMORIES FOR MY FAMILY",
YET, THE TRUMPIST LOST IT! 
EXITED THANKSGIVING 'CHRISTIAN' TALKING OF GOD AND USING THE F.... WORD PROFUSELY!

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra7dDWgGaqI

Brutal Honesty

 Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Published on 25 Nov 2016
Thanks Giving message from Donald J Trump supporter 
Let's be honest America.. We judge your choices.... we judge your lack of strive..... We judge the amount of hate in your heart..... We judge your actions your temper tantrums... We could care less about the color of your skin💁🏼 
Side note: people with food stamps aren't bad people I'm not saying that! We all struggle and need a little help! However people who stay on them years and do nothing to change your situation I'm talking to you💁🏼

 



UK WAYWOOD TERRITORY, WAYWOOD WAY OF LIFE OR RELIGION.



UK WAYWOOD TERRITORY, WAYWOOD WAY OF LIFE OR RELIGION.

 DANIEL WILLIAM BROOKS 
"dictating chief Raöul Halvar of the Waywood Territory"

When I saw Daniel smoking and using such foul language non stop, he immediately put me off! 

I once met (in the seventies or eighties) the leader of the French Ecological Movement in a Chinese Restaurant in Paris.  He was smoking. I went straight to him and said to his face that his movement was bogus. And I was proven right! 

Anyway, such foul language immediately disqualifies anybody who claims to teach or preach to others!  If the people around him REALLY CARED for him, they should have insisted that he stopped smoking, at least in public, and stop completely using such foul language, which is a clear sign that he has lost or is losing the battle. 
I have watched a few videos of Daniel; HE IS GENUINE 100%, but out of his mind.  I am a grand-father of 4 with huge responsibilities, and I have no intention of committing suicide.  He cannot and will not change the system, and people will not be of much help to him when the authorities will decide his fate!  However, I do not think anybody can stop him in his folly.  Many are out of their mind like him or do not give a damn.  

What Daniel and his team are doing is all right, but they should just use this opportunity only for recreational purposes, not political ones.  Attacking the system at the same type is futile and counter productive, and if he is really convinced the system will not destroy him when the time comes, he is heavily mistaken.

DANIEL HAS CONTROL OVER NOTHING EXCEPT THE FEW FOLLOWERS HE HAS AND THIS IS ONLY TEMPORARY!

Daniel will attract a few people here and there, but this will be just a drop in an ocean, and will make no change at all except at some individual level.  But, if he continues in this way, I do not see how he can last long! 


 BAFS

P.S.I commented on his facebok page after reading what was posted there.  So, all my comments were relevant to what was posted.  But, now I have a better overall picture of who he is and what his fight is all about, and especially against the Upper Class pedophilia rackets!


“Daniel William Brooks, self proclaimed dictating chief Raöul Halvar of the Waywood Territory has owned the formerly known as, plot 20, woodland since 2014.  Since 2014, as the British citizen Daniel Brooks, he has received constant harassment from local authorities of the United Kingdom.”
“Despite not once breaking any UK law, the rightful owner, Daniel Brooks has been subjected to theft, damages, trespass and over all destruction of the woodland he rightfully, legally and lawfully owns by deed, at the hands of the local authorities of the UK.
Daniel resides “on his land as a homeless man with little to nothing left but the earth and trees around him.”  
“There have been numerous times Daniel feels he has been cheated by the UK, with its system that would see someone on the street rather than let them sleep and work on their own land.” 
Daniel’s “way, was far more efficient and rewarding than the current world leaders had to offer.” 

“In 2019, Tara Egan visited Daniel, Tara heard his ideas and then declared she would bestow her sovereign rights unto Daniel, no longer making him a British citizen but a chief of an independent micronation and the Waywood Territory was founded. Declaring Waywood no longer UK jurisdiction.

Since then, Daniel, now referred to by those of Waywood, as Chief Raöul Halvar, has had more men and women declare their sovereignty to him based on the way he invisions community and for the right to live on the land and Co exist with nature, thus making it now, the Waywood way. Which is a peaceful self sufficient one.” 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53s-uGMXmus

In the above video, Daniel was misleading us (probably not deliberately) because he was not visited by THE POLICE, but by Police community support officers (PCSO), but he was the one doing most of the talking! WHY? Does not this make fools of the PCSO or of himself? He did not show any footage of the visitors at all!  WHY?  Because he received 'ORDERS' from the PSCO not to show them at all!




When I was invited by my facebook “friend” John Oakes (or facebook) to “like” the Waywood Territorypage, I was expecting to see well informed adults, fighters, and people fighting more or less for the same human values, as I regarded John Oakes of having, but it immediately became obvious that I was dealing with a bunch of the usual ignorant lunatics and “communitarians” of one specific type, filled with hatred, selectively or not, but posing as the Saviours of Mother Earth, or at least of their “MICRONATIONWAYWOOD TERRITORYthey have set up in 2019 “IN COLLABORATION WITH THE POLICE” as they claim themselves.  According to their own introductory texts, they were attempting to complement the local authorities’ (government’s) incompetence in matters of national or Community safety.  Whether they are paid for that with our tax-money or not remains to be established.

What is their understanding of Community and nation has still to be defined. “The Waywood Territory claims to be a “Micro Nation”, founded by nicotine, cannabis or whatever other drug smoker Chief Raöul Halvar, and a community of men and women who believe in an “alternative way of living”.

There are many ways of living, but their use of the terms “micronation”, “community”, “alternative”, “Chief”, “Master Builder”,  “low impact self sufficient life”, etc. have to be clarified.  They are without any doubt starting an alternative or specific tribal way of life, which is not new at all, and at the same time some their followers tribalised under a made-up “Code of Conduct” show their real ugly faces by freely using foul language, attacking all religions except their own, identified by me as Gaïa and confirmed by one of them, lying about religion in general, showing their hatred of Islam, like the lunatic who called me MO-HAM-HEAD!       

Their fundamental characteristic is that they aim at their own tribe or “Micro Nation”, and anyone who does not agree with them is anathematized.  The leader(s) claim they have “experience” and “knowledge” to “advise, encourage, assist and support projects that promote self reliance and environment friendlier ways of living.”Governmental and semi-governmental “projects” are well documented to exercise control over the local population for the benefit of the same corporations and media. 

 They want to go back to “NATURE”, “fire circle, communal cooking, camping”, etc. while still working for slave wages in towns, but at the same time enjoy “a safe peaceful break away from their busy life's” that “allows them to release pressure and recharge amongst the trees and beneath the stars.” They will live in “open camps”with the aim to “socialise, share stories and discuss various things with each other.  But, the truth is that they accept no FREEDOM OF SPEECH for others or people like me.   

Their arrogance is such that they claim their “Micro nation” will protect “our earth”, which should normally mean the WHOLE EARTH, but here it could mean only THEIR “Waywood Territory”, their “Waywood land”!

Then, they betray themselvesby saying boldly that they also attend “local Council meetings” when those same Councils are working hand in hand with the Corporations that own and run the State on behalf of the Royals, and causing the pollution of the environment, the engineering of all species when possible, the poisoning of our body and soul, and implementing all the abominations ordered by the dictatorial national government itself controlled by bank gangsters and the Corporations. 

Why do we need to encourage “more community projects”?  It is all about TOTAL CONTROL!  Unless they are really dumb, our people are very able to set up their own “markets, allotments and gardens”, but the Council wants to control and controls everything. 
Where is “The Waywood Territory” located?  In the midst of England that does “not wish for us to succeed and has actively attempted to sabotage our efforts. We now must defend our territory from invasion. Waywood is currently in an active occupational conflict against neighbouring authorities whom believe low impact lifestyles should not be encouraged.” 

They are united, and their aim is self-safety, self-sufficiency, freedom, and “to strip ourselves of unnecessary materialism and abandon consumerism completely.”  

“We are building an independent group of individuals whom wish to create a micronation separate and free of the United Kingdom.” 

That “More and more of the earth is being pillaged and torn apart” is fully documented.  Therefore, they say it is their “duty, obligation and responsibility to try and do better, to try and fix what we have allowed to happen.”

Duty, obligation and responsibility are all religious concepts.  It is interesting to see that they do acknowledge this truth that WE OURSELVES ALLOWED all this evil to happen. 
“ We have the right to choose our leaders and governors and we do not trust those that oversee the United Kingdom, we don't believe them nor do we wish to entertain them.”
“We have the right to choose our leaders and governors”; this was what “democracy” was meant to be, and never was and never will be without a GRASSROOT POPULAR REVOLUTION towards that effect.

“Waywood has chosen their chief and stand loyally beside him as he stands his ground to mark the way for a low impact, greener and self reliant future. While governments take the rights away from the people, we strive to exercise those rights. While there is war, we will promote peace.”

In other words, they are admitting the fact, as I always claimed it to be, that governments do and did take the rights away from the people, meaning we have been and are living under a dictatorship, or a totalitarian democracy!

“While there is deforestation we plant seeds.”  But, there is also the saying that prevention is better than cure.  Allowing them to deforest, and then attempt to plant seeds has not much sense, which does not mean that we should stop planting seeds.  But, in this preamble, I did not see any mention of Monsanto and other Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) agency that will prevent even that from happening
 “While the corporations destroy, we must restore.”

The same applies to the corporations that destroy, but to pretend that we can restore what corporations have destroyed is mere fantasy. 

 “The world leaders at this time are allowing rainforest to burn, oceans to become suffocated with plastic, the homeless to be punished, the children to be poisoned, nuclear waste to be spilled into the sea and entire species to go extinct. Enough is enough.” 

What is omitted here is that world leaders obey to one diktat: that of the rulers of the Earth who act as one and are as a matter of fact one and the same financial and military superpower.  The damn entity called the WEST and their demonic EMPIRE that has set up a SLAVE WORLD ORDER with one law for all: OBEY OR DIE! 

“We are anybody and everybody. There is no exclusion.”

I found out after only a few hours that this is a lie as I was almost immediately threatened, vilified, threatened, and excluded from the discourse with insults and defamation coming from all their vocal contributors on that Facebook page although I was not blocked, but asked to leave.  I told them I was not a Facebooker, but they did not give a damn finding out who I was really or what I knew as it was not about me, but what I have been writing for at least three decades.  When I provided them with a link of my Blog, the response is:



 ALAN HAVILL

Alan Havill Muhammad Ali, well your still on his page, Just delete and block him.”

 “A community where people help people, where men and women are accepted for their beliefs and opinions.” ???

“Anyone can bestow their sovereignty to the Chief of Waywood and join the Waywood community.”

Bestow our sovereignty to a human?  This is typical Christianity and Churchianity, and European Royalty, King-Queen-Subject governance where FREEDOM IS NON EXISTENT!     
“No one is excluded from being a subject, as it is your right to choose.”
This is typical lunacy!

 “As long as you stand under the declaration of Independenceand code of conductwhere applicable you can be a subject (visit social structure for more information on subjects)”
WOW!  Declaration on Independence!  Code of Conduct!

WAYWOOD TERRITORY THEMES QUOTED

1.      climate change
2.      pollution of the earth
3.      looming threat of a worldwide catastrophic event
4.      global warming
5.      deforestation of the rainforests
6.      polluting of the ocean
7.      to not fund corporations and consumerism
8.      the 'famous'mud hut couple of Devon
9.      Alan and Kate Burrows
10.  those who are there to look out for us, lack empathy, respect, honour and over all treat others as lesser beings. Believing that wealth warrants power.
11.  Greed and vanity of the upper classes rule over the running prime minister and the average man or woman is pushed into poverty.
12.  A community where people help people, where men and women are accepted for their beliefs and opinions.
13.  Where they feel safe, secure and comfortable. But more so, at peace.
14.  A community that listens and comes together for the greater good of the community and not personal gain.
15.  A community who use renewable energy, such as solar and wind,
16.  recycle and reuse responsibly,
17.  use alternatives to plastic
18.  plant trees instead of cutting them down for profit.
19.  A community that farms its own food free of pesticides and chemicals, with no price tag on produce that grows free from the ground.
20.  A community that does not pay for water that falls from the sky and does not expect men and women to rent or buy a safe place to reside when these are basic human needs, not privileges to be bought by the highest bidder.
21.  A community that encourages the use of plant based materials and products and prioritises health over wealth.
22.  A community that does not need money, but voluntarily contributes and reaps the fruit of those seeds sown.
23.  corruption in the high offices
24.  unnecessary wars overseas,
25.  high profile pedophiles
26.  exploitation of our fellow man or woman,
27.  ultimate enslavement of our species for selfish gain
28.  disgusting disregard for the future generations,
29.  the Waywood Territory is going back to the times of old, when a men and women looked after one another and looked out for one another
30.  that is the Waywood Way. 

Daniel William Brooks is extremely well intentioned, and I share most of his findings and concerns.  But, sadly, I see him (I may be wrong) as completely deluded, and many well-intentioned, but angry, fanatical, openly racist and intolerant people have joined him in his delusion.  His way is not a bad way, but he and his followers (mostly of the same cultural and “White” background) do not see that he is also being manipulated.  No Member of Parliament will ever allow Councillors to formally dialogue with him or his followers unless they are on their voting list and vote for them.  Otherwise this does not make any sense at all.  As for his collaboration with the “Police”, this too points to the fact that the local government policy is again one of control.  I have been through the facebook pages of the ones having attacked me without any substance except rage, malice and old age rancour, each one with his or her own agenda: dreamers, some kind of health, cultural or ethical shortcomings, including racism, anti-religion, anti-God, Odin, Gaïa, drugs, Namastéism, Guruism, Galactics, Yoga, Supremacism, and a total ignorance or refusal of other world realities.  But, nothing to worry, although I wish I could still be alive to see the Chief Number Two at work!  Without Government approval nothing of the kind Daniel wants to do will be achieved except at the individual level, and even then it will be very restricted.  I have in mind what I know about similar catastrophic situations in France and the USA Corporation.   No matter what I said, I was either ignored or attacked proving that we are not dealing with reasonable people.   No debate or exchange of ideas was possible given that I have always shared most of their grievances!  The one against GOD was pathetic!

IN CONCLUSION, to prove my point, I was asked by Alan Havill, one of the Waywoodians:


Alan HavillCan I ask Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus what religion are you?

* It was none of his business, but the fact that he wanted to know meant that the Waywoodians have not done their homework at all as far as I am concerned.  I gave the answer right in my very first comment.  Yet, I remained extremely polite and even answered his question that I had already answered before to others right on this page.  And he totally ignored my reply and responded to Daniel or to me (Not clear!) "Just delete and block him" (Daniel? or me to be “DELETED” and “BLOCKED”!  This tells us loads about their mentality!

 MY REPLY TO ALAN HAVILL

Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus Alan Havill - ALAN, that's a polite question, but you won't like or agree with my answer. The fanatics here should have done their research instead of displaying their laziness, ignorance, HATRED, and lack of TRUE COMPASSION for the human kind, while they claim to LOVE MOTHER EARTH! Yes, you will probably not like my answer. MY WAY OF LIFE (many call RELIGION), all my life, has been:  

STRUGGLE, TRUTH, JUSTICE and THE MORAL WAY.

 Now, the sheeple give it the name they want, I do not care. I am a HUMAN OF THE UNCONTAMINATED EARTH forced to live in a very contaminated one thanks to the folly of monsters calling themselves humans. I am sure you are experienced enough to understand this. Your Nicotine or Cannabis Chief says COMMON LAW IS A CRIME that has to be prosecuted, but I am a Sovereign Freeman-on-the-land standing under Common Law. I never belonged to any political or religious group all my life. I never voted in my entire life. And I never served any government that goes against my WAY OF LIFE! I was not supposed to write again here, but even your Chief keeps talking to and about me after he had asked me to LEAVE, and after I had left out of courtesy (not common anymore). I NEVER IN MY LIFE DISRESPECT MY HOST. But, I was not invited here, attacked non-stop, and asked to leave!

Respectfully yours.
BAFS
Love, love, love.
 
Alan HavillMuhammad Ali, well your still on his page, Just delete and block him. (Not clear to whom he was talking!)


BAFS
Sunday 8 September 2019

 Jump to

Comments
  • Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus“Waywood Territory” is blatantly yet another piece of garbage like “COMMON PURPOSE” for policing and controlling the community! Only naïve and ignorant people will join or New Agers! The Police are under oath to the Royals not to the people!

    BAFS

    Sovereign Freeman-on-the-land
    I never voted nor belonged to any political or religious group in my entire life

    😜🤣🤪


  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusHOLY SHIT! "Waywood reserves the right to hold any man or woman who breaches our code of conduct, now recognised by the British police authorities and any offenders will be extradited over to our new formed allys who will deal with offenders appropriately" - THIS IS MORE POLICING!👿👿👿
  • John OakesMuhammad Ali Ben Marcusby the right people in my eyes...the police will help us against the Corporate Authorities ....this is a bridge well built
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusJohn Oakes - John, you cannot just discard the FACTS I have mentioned in my 2 comments. I do not expect anybody to BELIEVE ME, but to do their own research, but not IMPOSE on some their DOGMA as COLLABORATORS and SPIES! MICRONATION, WHAT IS THAT MOTHEREARTHIST OR GAIA GARBAGE? Maybe, if some really want to know, they should contact BRIAN GERRISH if he is still alive! BAFS
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusJohn Oakes Brian Gerrish - Government Policy
    5g awareness
    Published on 6 Jan 2019See More
  • Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Brian Gerrish - Government Policy
    youtube.com
    Brian Gerrish - Government…
    Brian Gerrish - Government Policy
  • Waywood TerritoryMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus IF someone who isn't a Waywooder commits a crime. It will be handled by THEIR authorities not ours. Simple as that. If you break the law in another country you can be extradited to your own. We hold that right.
    Or would you rather we dug a pit and left you in their to rot as would be the way I'd treat disrespectful trespassers.
  • Michelle MarkersonGaia garbage???? Mo- ham-head - fuck off with your ignorant foolishness - and fake god( invisible friend) Gaia is what keeps you and everyone alive.
  • Michelle MarkersonWaywood Territory from the comments I see mo-ham-head will only pollute and poison the land - just as religion wars politicians and coorperations have.
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusMichelle Markerson Did you see how good I am at spotting guys like you? 🤪🤣👿 A bunch of RACIST SUPREMACISTS and IGNORAMUSES or RETARDS!
  • Waywood TerritoryHe has to like his own comments 😂🙄
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusMichelle Markerson And, tell your Guru to get off Corporate NICOTINE before he starts preaching to others! Your tribal Chief Raöul Halvar! 🤣
  • Michelle MarkersonMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus no racist here at all I love everyone mo-ham-head- I'm no racist because I don't believe in b.s. religion (invisible friends) coorperations, the government or wars- learn to read you poor ignorant man! Gaia keeps you and yours alive- that's not racist- I love my family and friends and the planet enough to do something about it keyboard warrior - what are you doing? Ahhh yes talking to your imaginary friend 😂
  • Michelle MarkersonMo-ham-head your so funny - now get on your knees and tell your imaginary friend with your head on the floor- that's all your good for😘
  • Waywood TerritoryMuhammad with his 33 friends, Christmas tree and silly hat😂
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusMichelle Markerson GO BACK TO SCHOOL, AND LEARN TO READ ENGLISH! 🤪"BAFS
    Sovereign Freeman-on-the-land
    I never voted nor belonged to any political or religious group in my entire life😜🤣🤪"
  • Waywood TerritoryCome and exercise your Freeman bullshit here at Waywood....
  • Michelle MarkersonMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus neither have I- the planet comes first- what part of that do you not understand???? I see you are struggling with it, as so many other sleeping sheep are.
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusWaywood Territory"Come and exercise your Freeman bullshit here at Waywood"? I said already that I am GOOD at making fools like you REVEAL their inner SELF and HIDDEN AGENDA!
  • Waywood TerritoryIf you were to come here preaching or trying to exercise your Freeman ideology, you'll be held by Waywood and you'll be extradited to the authorities of the UK and you'll be prosecuted. Simple as that.
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusWOW! In just a few exchanges, I managed to make them reveal their RELIGION and HIDDEN AGENDA! I am really good!
  • Waywood TerritoryYou haven't revealed out hidden religion or Agenda. We have a website WITH ALL INFO ON IT
  • Waywood TerritoryYou have no following. No credibility. No knowledge of us or what we do. No actual positive input. You are a parasite. A sick and lonely man who has no real clue on what he is saying or who he's talking to. If you did, youd know my experiences make me chief. More than you'll ever have.
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusWaywood Territory Learn to respond IN CONTEXT! I am commenting IN CONTEXT. Why don't you find out what that word means? I AM HERE! Can't you see me with my "idiotic" hat? Why send me somewhere else?
  • Nage AratMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus I am not religious nor do I have any political agendas. I am a Waywooder. We are made up of all kinds of people just not the hateful negative kind
  • Waywood TerritoryMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus you are alot of fun....im not going to ban you....and brian Gerrish is a fucking schill with the "UK" COLUM...HAHAH
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusWaywood Territory You are just a bunch of RACIST, FASCIST, AND VIOLENT HATERS! Did you read the THREAT against me if I ever OPEN MY MOUTH in your MININATION TERRITORY? 👿🤣👿
  • Nage AratMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus that's not a threat against you per say it's our code of conduct when on Waywood Territory
  • Nage AratMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus afraid to educate yourself on our ways because you could be proved wrong
  • Waywood TerritoryDo you own land in the UK? Have you ever tried to defend it against authority? Have you been in court fighting for your land for years? Have you a community of people you are responsible for? Do you even have a family??? Do you know what it is like to loose everything and fight your way back up while people constant kick you while your down? Are you involved in any Community groups or projects?
    Your a self declared narcissist. You probably drive a car. You live in London, the most secure human farm there is. You no doubt have fluoride toothpaste. And I'm gonna guess that you still have a TV!!! So excuse me if I laugh at your attempts to make us look bad while you Continue to buy into that system, while we are actively changing it and exercising our rights. As I say. Come here. Your welcome to. Come exercise your Freeman knowledge, breach our code of conduct. And we will hold you and as the post states, our new formed allies will come. They'll take you away and you'll be prosecuted for trespass just as a start. You'll also be liable for £5000 fine. So please, come along. Try it out. I dare you.
    Or do you not have faith in your own belief?
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusNage Arat I have already educated myself right here! Fascists are ALWAYS RIGHT!
  • Nage AratMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus if you think you can educate yourself on a micronation via a comments section it says a lot about your research capabilities 😂😂😂
  • Nage AratMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus it's a code of conduct not a threat... do you call UK law a threat?
  • Angela WhitearFascists, racists,🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️ what's next?
  • Waywood TerritoryOh Muhammad. You poor lost little narcissist. It's no more of threat than the UK telling you if you break the law you'll be arrested. Who are you even preaching to? We are all Waywooders here. I alone have thousands of followers on fb, hundreds of subscribers on YouTube and our website is hitting hits like no tomorrow. So I'm not entirely sure who you are trying to convince? Your 33 friends who aren't even here??? 😂😂😂
  • Waywood TerritoryOh Muhammad, you have no idea. And that is such a shame. So much head space. So little mind.
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusMichelle Markerson Michelle, you never listen, do you? Why do you systematically ignore what I have written and come up always with your dogmas? Anyway, I will have to put an end as I do not like FANATICS of all religions! Calling me MO HAM HEAD is an insult! And, I have no respect for DISRESPECTFUL creatures! 😍
  • Waywood TerritoryMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus LMFAO you are so full of shit you could be a portaloo. We had someone just like you here before. And he's since gone and it's been so lovely without him. I imagine you leaving this thread will be the same
  • Nage AratMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus it's people like you that help us progress my friend so hate away
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusWaywood Territory"I alone have thousands of followers on fb" - I have NO FRIENDS on facebook, NOT A SINGLE ONE! So, according to you, quantity is what counts, not quality! Is it about popularity or RIGHT and WRONG? I am living in a country where RACISM is protected by law! They call it EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES! It was John Oakes who invited m to like your facebook page because he knows I am not a racist but defend the right of NATIVE WHITE EUROPEANS to TRY and remain "WHITE"! Because, I am also a REAL FRIEND of DAVID DUKE, I have been labelled ANTISEMITIC hundreds of times. In brief, you cannot please everybody! BAFS
  • Nage Aratthe only one hating here is you Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus you have made assumptions from a comments section and refuse to educate yourself before entering into such mud slinging... your approach is distasteful
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusWaywood Territory"So much head space. So little mind." You are wrong, I do not have much head space at all! As for the mind, jut read the SUPERIOR MINDS who responded to my comments! But, I will leave you with your AGENDA or maybe DREAMS! I have written more than enough! BAFS
  • Nage AratMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus shame you aren't capable of continuing our debate
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusNage Arat I already said YOUR ENGLISH STINKS! You make a THREAT, and you say it is NOT A THREAT!
  • Nage AratMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus please share this threat?
    the only thing I see is you being told that your hateful attitude would not be tolerated on Waywood land and when on Waywood land our code of conduct applies. Just as UK laws apply in the UK... do you consider any of the UK laws to be a threat?
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusNage Arat Waywood land? Are you another Apartheid Israel?
  • Nage AratMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus the Waywood Territory has its own land... Whats Israel got to do with it?
  • Nage AratMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus Also you talk of others not answering your questions yet you avoid answering mine... do you consider UK laws a threat if you claim our code of conduct to be such?
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusWaywood Territory"preaching or trying to exercise your Freeman ideology" = CRIME? I said you were a bunch of FASCISTS! But, you did not quote the law! It is not an IDEOLOGY, but a fact because we still have COMMON LAW, which the gangster State wants to eradicate with MININATIONALISTS like you! 🤣
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusWaywood Territory"fucking moron?" shows your level of MORAL education as well as your scholarship on such serious issues as GOVERNANCE at national level! You are pathetic!
  • Waywood TerritoryTrespass Muhammad. Its called trespass 🙄 you'd think some one as well educated as you would of figured that one out 🤨
  • Nage AratMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus is super clever guys be careful... he found one of my video uploads from April... 😂😂😂
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusWaywood Territory"Do you own land in the UK? Have you ever tried to defend it against authority? Have you been in court fighting for your land for years? Have you a community of people you are responsible for? Do you even have a family??? Do you know what it is like to loose everything and fight your way back up while people constant kick you while your down? Are you involved in any Community groups or projects?
    Your a self declared narcissist. You probably drive a car. You live in London, the most secure human farm there is. You no doubt have fluoride toothpaste. And I'm gonna guess that you still have a TV!!! So excuse me if I laugh at your attempts to make us look bad while you Continue to buy into that system, while we are actively changing it and exercising our rights. As I say. Come here. Your welcome to. Come exercise your Freeman knowledge, breach our code of conduct. And we will hold you and as the post states, our new formed allies will come. They'll take you away and you'll be prosecuted for trespass just as a start. You'll also be liable for £5000 fine. So please, come along. Try it out. I dare you.
    Or do you not have faith in your own belief?" I WILL RESPOND TO THIS ON MY PAGE! Thank you.
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusWaywood Territory It is up to you to tell your readers you are talking about your private property duly registered on a title deed as Waywood Territory. But, what the heck about calling your tribe a micronation and bragging about your collaboration with the Police? And what the heck of mentioning me behind my back after you had asked me to leave your page and after I had left? Backbiter!
  • Alan HavillCan I ask Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus what religion are you?
  • Waywood TerritoryMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus wow considering you don’t agree with what we do, spend a lot of time and energy here
    You obviously actually lack practice of love for mankind and reveal yourself as a huge hypocrite
    You are still trying to be a fear monger here, no matter what your views
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusAlan Havill - ALAN, that's a polite question, but you won't like or agree with my answer. The fanatics here should have done their research instead of displaying their laziness, ignorance, HATRED, and lack of TRUE COMPASSION for the humankind, while they claim to LOVE MOTHER EARTH! Yes, you will probably not like my answer. MY WAY OF LIFE (many call RELIGION), all my life, has been: STRUGGLE, TRUTH, JUSTICE and THE MORAL WAY. Now, the sheeple give it the name they want, I do not care. I am a HUMAN OF THE UNCONTAMINATED EARTH forced to live in a very contaminated one thanks to the folly of monsters calling themselves humans. I am sure you are experienced enough to understand this. Your Nicotine or Cannabis Chief says COMMON LAW IS A CRIME that has to be prosecuted, but I am a Sovereign Freeman-on-the-land standing under Common Law. I never belonged to any political or religious group all my life. I never voted in my entire life. And I never served any government that goes against my WAY OF LIFE! I was not supposed to write again here, but even your Chief keeps talking to and about me after he had asked me to LEAVE, and after I had left out of courtesy (not common anymore). I NEVER IN MY LIFE DISRESPECT MY HOST. But, I was not invited here, attacked non-stop, and asked to leave! Respectfully yours. https://muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.com/.../al-quds.... BAFS😍🥰😘
  • Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    AL QUDS JERUSALEM THE HOLY LAND ETERNAL CAPITAL OF PALESTINE.
    muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.com
    AL QUDS JERUSALEM…
    AL QUDS JERUSALEM THE HOLY LAND ETERNAL CAPITAL OF PALESTINE.
  • Waywood TerritoryMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus you came barging in uninvited and basicly being a dick right from the offset. If you had come in peace and shown a little respect it would have been very different. Your just one of those keyboard warrior trolls. Treat people how you wish to be treated yourself. You bring yourself a hard time but preach your wrong done by. Any one can read this whole section if chat and clearly see that you are a wrong doer and that someone like you clearly does not belong here in any way shape or form. We are peaceful but if you poke us with sticks we bite. We are not here for your sad warrior pleasures. So how about u take your trolling arse and just fuck off. You ain't welcome. We meet many of great men and women who are welcomed. You sir are a fucking dick and will never be apart of our lives so stop talking out your Gary glitter and do one
  • Alan HavillMuhammad Ali, well your still on his page, Just delete and block him.
  • Write a reply...





  • Waywood TerritoryMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus is an example of the types of people we do not accept into Waywood.
    Narcissistic and toxic. Ego rotten and overly self important. What a cretin of a being. A state of a man


    • Nage AratWaywood Territory it's a shame he wasn't prepared to educate himself prior to his mud slinging attack. Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus assumed to know all he needed to from a post and comments thread. I hoped he had potential to test us on an educated level... but sadly not the case 😐
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusWaywood Territory"keyboard warrior"? Couldn't you not find something more original?
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusNage Arat"he wasn't prepared to educate himself"? I was trying to educate dummies LIKE YOU, but I knew in advance it was in vain. So, I offered you a few minutes of FREE ENTERTAINMENT, but sooner or later you will have to pay for your own folly! Adios, bunch of hopeless retards! BAFS
  • Waywood TerritoryHahahaha yes KEYBOARD WARRIOR!!!!!! You are nothing but a keyboard
  • Nage AratMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus😂you are showing yourself up here. I'm embarrassed for you 😳
  • Waywood TerritoryMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus i think you have a few wires crossed or a few eroding terminals
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusWaywood Territory Who is narcissistic, the one who is bragging about his popularity or me?
  • Nage AratMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus Now who is struggling with the English language... showing yourself up is not the same as showing off😂
  • Waywood TerritoryI was asking who you were talking to here or directing your comments too? Cause the people I talk to are the people who want to see us succeed. And there is alot. You don't seem to have any one who wants to see you succeed....
  • Waywood TerritoryIts actually the popularity of the movements and its ideology....this is not about one mans popularity....wires crossed again
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusWaywood Territory I know I am an uninvited guest here and an unwanted one. So, I am going! This is normal courtesy, and thank you for your hospitality. But, your COLLABORATION with the Satanic System will remain on record! BAFS
  • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusNage Arat"showing yourself up is not the same as showing off". Correct. It was just a lapsus. 🤪
  • Nage AratMuhammad Ali Ben Marcus we have a collaboration with men and women. their uniforms have nothing to do with it. I think you are leaving this chat because you have no real argument here
  • Waywood TerritoryWe also have an agreement with the postman and the garbage men.... Quick get batman!!
  • Waywood TerritoryOr whomever else you call when you need help or services 🙄🤔
  • Write a reply...





  • Kate BurrowsShe looks great! Im sure i recognise her from school maybe x
  • Stuart MatherWell played man ... keep it all on the positive 😉


  • 1454, Pape Nicolas V - Attaquer, Conquérir, Vaincre, Réduire et Soumettre en esclavage perpétuel païens, Sarrasins - LOUIS XIV CODE NOIR 1685.

     Petit-fils des survivants de l'esclavage par les Occidentaux christianistes et aristocratiques!

    Gunnahgar Gunnahgar Gunnahgar
    Member of Ertugrul->Osman Dirillis Spoilers-ENGLISH since June 11, 2019
     
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndXuRoJd6hQ

    Battle of Hattin, 1187 - Saladin's Greatest Victory -معركة حطين


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Published on 17 Nov 2018
     ► To skip straight to the battle, head over to 12:50► Please consider supporting our work on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/historymarche Narration: Alexander Doddy www.alexanderdoddy.com Script: Matthew Hollis Arabic Subtitles: Abdelrhman Ahmed Emira and Hadji Ahmed Saladin bust model based on József Czakó wonderful work: https://jozsefczako.artstation.com/pr...
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bk6QgtHUQKk

    Abby Martin : How Palestine Became Colonized (The Empire Files )

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Published on 6 Dec 2016
    MUST !!! Trump and the Greater Israel (WARNING! 
     DISTURBING CONTENT!) : Previewing Abby Martin's on-the-ground investigation in Palestine, The Empire Files looks at the long history of Zionist colonization, expansion and expulsion of . In this snippet from an of the The Empire Files, Abby Martin tells how from its inception, political Zionism was not only a plan for colonization and . In her first on-the-ground report from Palestine, Abby Martin gives a first-hand look into two of the most attacked refugee camps in the West Bank: Balata and .

    Resurrection Ertugrul Season 1 Episode 1

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Published on 29 Apr 2019

    Winter approaches Suleyman Shah's camp. On a hunt, Ertugrul rescues prisoners from the crusaders. Commander Titus and Ustadi Azam build a new army. Join the tribe! Facebook: http://facebook.com/TRTErtugrulEN Twitter: http://twitter.com/TRTErtugrul_EN Instagram: http://instagram.com/trtertugrul_en

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYP8-oJim9Q

    Raped by a Catholic priest: An ex-nun speaks out | DW News

     Published on 7 Feb 2019

    The Catholic Church has been hit by yet another abuse scandal. Pope Francis has acknowledged that high-ranking members of the clergy sexually abused and raped nuns. Francis admitted suspending priests and bishops for abusing women and promised to do more to eradicate the problem. Up until now, the Vatican has done almost nothing to address the crimes. Campaigners say sexual abusers are protected by a culture of silence and secrecy. Former nun Doris Reisinger told DW that a priest raped her. Today she is an Catholic theologian and author, who has published a book about her experience. Subscribe: http://www.youtube.com/user/deutschew... For more news go to: http://www.dw.com/en/ Follow DW on social media: ►Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deutschewell...►Twitter: https://twitter.com/dwnews►Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dw_stories/ Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: https://www.youtube.com/channel/deuts...#CatholicChurch
     

     Achtung! I have not yet listened to this "gentleman" combattant!

    Srdja Popovic - Comment faire tomber un dictateur quand on est seul, tout petit, et sans armes

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0q4AvLMecE

    Srdja Popovic: How to topple a dictator

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Published on 15 Jul 2015

    2011 was a year of people-powered resistance, starting with Arab Spring and spreading across the world. How did it work? Srdja Popovic (who led the nonviolent movement that took down Milosevic in Serbia in 2000) lays out the plans, skills and tools each movement needs — from nonviolent tactics to a sense of humor. (Filmed at TEDxKrakow.) TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design -- plus science, business, global issues, the arts and much more. Find closed captions and translated subtitles in many languages at http://www.ted.com/translate Follow TED news on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/tednews Like TED on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TED Subscribe to our channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/TEDtalksD...


     

    1454, Pape Nicolas V

    Attaquer, Conquérir, Vaincre, Réduire et  Soumettre en esclavage perpétuel païens, Sarrasins...
    LOUIS XIV CODE NOIR 1685.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    8 Janvier 1454 : l’Église catholique et le Pape Nicolas V bénissent l’esclavage et la traite négrière !

    3 compléments


    L’Église catholique a joué sur un triple registre négrier, en co-produisant une idéologie de légitimation de la traite et de l’esclavage des Africains et de leurs descendants ; en s’impliquant directement dans le partage des prédations négrières ; enfin en étant bénéficiaire économique et confessionnel de la traite négrière.

    Extrait de la Bulle du Pape Nicolas V, du 8 janvier 1454, qui a eu pendant des siècles des conséquences désastreuses sur les Africains.
    " Nous avions jadis, par de précédentes lettres, concédé au Roi Alphonse du Portugal, entre autres choses, la faculté pleine et entière d’attaquer, de conquérir, de vaincre, de réduire et de soumettre tous les sarrasins (c’est-à-dire les MUSULMANS*), païens et autres ennemis du Christ où qu’ils soient, avec leurs royaumes, duchés, principautés, domaines, propriétés, meubles et immeubles, tous les biens par eux détenus et possédés, de réduire leurs personnes en servitude perpétuelle, (...) de s’attribuer et faire servir à usage et utilité ces dits royaumes, duchés, contrés, principautés, propriétés, possessions et biens de ces infidèles sarrasins (MUSULMANS*) et païens...
    Beaucoup de Guinéens et d’autres Noirs qui avaient été capturés, certains aussi échangés contre des marchandises non prohibées ou achetées sous quelque autre contrat de vente régulier, furent envoyés dans les dits Royaumes ".
    (*Un petit malin, en principe un RACISTE ANTI-ARABE, ANTIMUSULMAN, s'est amusé à dire que SARRASINS = AFRICAINS!)





    "Africaine" emmenée en esclavage marquée au fer rouge
    L’église catholique, accoudée à ses anciens coalisés de la période esclavagiste tente d’allumer des contre-feux médiatiques visant à faire pièce au puissant vent d’exigences de reconnaissance et de réparations qui a agité comme une lame de fond la Conférence Contre le Racisme de Durban en septembre 2001. La diversion toute trouvée a été la piteuse mise en scène en 2003 de prélats catholiques africains, qui plaidaient une responsabilité africaine dans la Traite négrière. Cette sortie inconséquente donnant volontairement ou non à s’absoudre aux associations négrières avérées : Lumières, Royautés, Industriels et Eglises. Il s’agit de rendre à l’Eglise catholique l’entièreté de l’empreinte déposée de son ensauvagement - incivilisation - négrier.

    Il est important de saisir la traite "négrière" comme une énorme entreprise de pratiquement cinq siècles de barbarie pendant lesquels l’alliance criminelle et afrocide des puissants d’Europe a fonctionné comme un broyeur d’humanités. Prélats, aristocrates, industriels, savants se sont mutuellement soutenus et influencés pour fabriquer une an-Afrique à leur image : le lieu spécialisé d’une déportation sanglante de millions d’Africains esclavisés.
    L’autorité morale de l’Eglise dans la société européenne était incontournable pour toute activité d’ampleur, elle régissait le quotidien, le spirituel, imbriquée au pouvoir qu’elle renforçait et à qui elle en imposait. La puissance d’évocation de la chrétienté, les territoires dominés par la religion et l’ordre chrétien relevaient de la diligence des hautes cimes de la société européenne.

    Ainsi l’Eglise catholique a t-elle joué sur un triple registre négrier, en co-produisant une idéologie de légitimation de la Traite et de l’Esclavage des Africains et de leurs descendants ; en s’impliquant directement dans la partage des prédations négrières ; enfin en étant bénéficiaire économique et confessionnel de la Traite négrière.

    D’un point de vue idéologique, l’Eglise a popularisé la légende de la descendance de Cham, fils maudit de Noé dans la Bible, condamné à n’être à jamais que l’esclave de l’esclave de ses frères, identifiant les Africains aux descendants de Cham…

    Cette désignation arbitraire d’une couleur, d’une altérité à mettre sous les fers, permettait de contribuer à l’extinction en Europe de stades extrêmes d’asservissements, accordant les pratiques d’exploitation sociale des puissants avec le discours chrétien à usage interne. Les infidèles, païens, hérétiques et incroyants lointains devenaient des esclaves par nature pour les mélanodermes spécifiquement.

    Dans ce contexte de justification de l’injustifiable, de légitimation de l’illégitime par essence, le 8 janvier 1454, Nicolas V, de son vrai nom Tommaso Parentucceli [1398-1455], 208e pape, écrit au souverain du Portugal Alphonse V une bulle papale spéciale l’autorisant à soumettre en esclavage les "nègres" de Guinée et les "païens".

    Cette position de l’Eglise catholique, accompagnée de la légende de Cham que la noble institution diffusait sans s’encombrer de son réel fondement textuel et théologique, trop contente de disposer de nouveaux territoires de croisades, d’évangélisation, ferait autorité balayant les réticences des négriers en herbes et traitants néophytes.
    La position de l’Eglise catholique par rapport à la Traite négrière n’allait pas être un épiphénomène loin de là, ses encouragements à l’ensauvagement esclavagiste continueraient tout au long de la période négrière, à l’instar de l’activisme doctrinaire de l’éminent théologien français Bellon de Saint Quentin, qui se servait des "Saintes Ecritures" pour libérer la conscience des traitants qui s’en remettaient à sa science.

    L’Eglise catholique fut aussi l’institution qui consacra, par l’intermédiaire de son représentant le pape Alexandre VI, Rodrigo Borgia de son vrai nom, le partage du monde entre le Portugal et l’Espagne en 1494 par le traité de Tordesillas. Au Portugal, revenaient l’Afrique, l’Asie et le Brésil alors que l’Espagne se voyait octroyée le reste de l’Amérique.






    Traduction de l’affiche ci-jointe : "Vente d’esclaves !" dans la note de bas de page [1]

    Théoricienne et organisatrice de la Traite négrière, l’Eglise allait s’activer pour en être un bénéficiaire direct et temporel, ne s’oubliant pas au festin des prédateurs. En effet lorsque le premier acte négrier fut posé par le rapt de dix Africains, perpétré par une expédition militaire portugaise menée par Nuno Tristan et Antam Gonsalves, les « meilleurs esclaves » furent offerts à Gabriele Condulmer dit Eugène IV, 207e pape de l’Eglise catholique, apostolique et romaine. A cela s’ajoutent les esclaves qui travaillaient dans les abbayes, monastères et autres lieux de résidence des religieux, soumis à toutes les servitudes liées à leur double de statut de bien meuble et d’esclave par nature, convertible à souhait au christianisme.

    Il ne faut pas oublier, en sus, le Code noir qui régissait dans les colonies françaises l’ensemble des soumissions et tortures légales des esclavisés, tous les instants de leur quasi-existence étant par décret orientés vers l’économie de plantation. Ce Code fait expressément référence à l’Eglise catholique, seule religion autorisée dans les colonies, monopole sur le marché du divin ...
    Il convient par conséquent de rendre au christianisme négrier ce qui lui revient, de s’armer d’une intransigeante culture de veille devant les nouveaux assauts de évisionnisme décuplés depuis que la question des réparations à la Traite négrière est abordée dans les grands forums internationaux comme Durban. La soudaine publicité au Vaudou béninois se termine rituellement dans les médias occidentaux par l’allégation avec pseudo témoignages de la participation volontariste du Dahomey à la Traite négrière. De telles indigences intellectuelles programmées pour produire des effets de désagrégation des dynamiques afro-diasporiques en cours et pour insensibiliser les opinions publiques occidentales à leur culpabilité historique procèdent par compilations sélectives des faits relatifs à la Traite négrière.

    Il est caractéristique que l’on ne se demande pas quelle était l’économie du Dahomey avant son entrée dans la Traite esclavagiste … Cette absence n’est pas neutre, elle s’explique par la nécessité de présenter des cas purs de collaboration volontaire d’Africains à leur démolition négrière. Or les historiens n’ignorent pas que avant que le Dahomey tombe pieds et poings dans les filets négriers, le roi Agaja Trudo avait déployé une énorme énergie résistante et politique pour arrêter la traite, proposant d’autres formes explicites de coopérations aux pays européens, faisant appel à leurs artisans, ainsi qu’il en fut des rois Ashantis, Kongo, etc…
    Akam Akamayong
    Source : AFRIKARA







    Afin de se rendre compte de la prégnance du lien entre l’Eglise catholique et les puissants dans l’institution de la colonisation, il est aussi intéressant de lire comment s’organiser le lien entre le gouvernement belge et les missionaires catholiques en 1920, soit presque 500 ans après la bulle papale de Nicolas V. Siècle après siècle, esclavagistes et religieux ont travaillés main dans la main.

    Extrait de la causerie de Jules Renquin, Ministre Belge des Colonies, en 1920 avec les premiers missionnaires catholiques du Congo-Belge.

    Les devoirs des Missionnaires dans notre colonie
    Révérends Pères et Chers Compatriotes, soyez les bienvenus dans notre seconde patrie, le Congo Belge
    La tâche que vous êtes conviés à y accomplir est très délicate et demande beaucoup de tact. Prêtres, vous venez certes pour évangéliser. Mais cette évangélisation doit s’inspirer de notre grand principe : tout avant tout pour les intérêts de la métropole (Belgique).

    Le but essentiel de votre mission n’est donc point d’apprendre au noirs à connaître Dieu. Ils le connaissent déjà. Ils parlent et se soumettent à un NZANBE ou un NVINDI-MUKULU, et que sais-je encore ? Ils savent que, tuer, voler, calomnier, injurier.. est mauvais.

    Ayant le courage de l’avouer, vous ne venez donc pas leur apprendre ce qu’ils savent déjà. Votre rôle consiste, essentiellement, à faciliter la tâche aux administratifs et aux industriels. C’est donc dire que vous interpréterez l’évangile de la façon qui sert le mieux nos intérêts dans cette partie du monde. Pour ce faire, vous veillerez entre autres à :

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     1. Désintéresser nos "sauvages" des richesses matérielles dont regorgent leur sol et sous-sol, pour éviter que s’intéressant, ils ne nous fassent une concurrence meurtrière et rêvent un jour à nous déloger.

    Votre connaissance de l’évangile vous permettra de trouver facilement des textes qui recommandent et ’font aimer la pauvreté’. Exemple : « Heureux sont les pauvres, car le royaume des cieux est à eux » et « il est plus difficile à un riche d’entrer au ciel qu’à un chameau d’entrer par le trou d’une aiguille ». Vous ferez donc tout pour que ces Nègres aient peur de s’enrichir pour mériter le ciel..

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     2. Les contenir pour éviter qu’ils ne se révoltent.
    Les administratifs ainsi que les industriels se verront obligés de temps en temps, pour se faire craindre, de recourir à la violence (injurier, battre..). II ne faudrait pas que les Nègres ripostent ou nourrissent des sentiments de vengeance. Pour cela, vous leur enseignerez de tout supporter. Vous commenterez et les inviterez à suivre l’exemple de tous les saints qui ont tendu la deuxième joue, qui ont pardonné les offenses, qui ont reçu sans tressaillir les crachats et les insultes.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     3. Les détacher et les faire mépriser tout ce qui pourrait leur donner le courage de nous affronter.

    Je songe ici spécialement à leurs nombreux fétiches de guerre qu’ils prétendent les rendre invulnérables. Étant donné que les vieux n’entendraient point les abandonner, car ils vont bientôt disparaître, votre action doit porter essentiellement sur les jeunes.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     4. Insister particulièrement sur la soumission et l’obéissance aveugles.

    Cette vertu se pratique mieux quand il y a absence d’esprit critique. Donc évitez de développer l’esprit critique dans vos écoles. Apprenez-leur à croire et non à raisonner.
    Instituez pour eux un système de confession qui fera de vous de bons détectives pour dénoncer tout noir ayant une prise de conscience et qui revendiquerait l’indépendance nationale.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     5. Enseignez-leur une doctrine dont vous ne mettrez pas vous-même les principes en pratique. Et s’ils vous demandaient pourquoi vous comportez-vous contrairement
    à ce que vous prêchez, répondez-leur que "vous les noirs, suivez ce que nous vous disons et non ce que nous faisons". Et s’ils répliquaient en vous faisant remarquer qu’une foi sans pratique est une foi morte, fâchez-vous et répondez : "heureux ceux qui croient sans protester".

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     6. Dites-leur que leurs statuettes sont l’oeuvre de Satan.
    Confisquez-les et allez remplir nos musées : de Tervurene, du Vatican. Faites oublier aux noirs leurs ancêtres.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     7. NEPRÉSENTEZJAMAISUNECHAISEÀ UNNOIRQUIVIENTVOUSVOIR.

    Donnez-lui tout au plus une cigarette. Ne l’invitez jamais à dîner même s’il vous tue une poule chaque fois que vous arrivez chez lui.

    NEJAMAISDIRE"VOUSUNNOIR, CARILSECROIRAIT L’ÉGALDUBLANC..

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     8. CONSIDÉREZTOUSLESNOIRSCOMMEDESPETITSENFANTS que vous devez CONTINUERÀ TROMPER.
    Exiger qu’ils vous appellent TOUS"MONRE".

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     9. Criez au communisme et à la persécution quand ils vous demandent de cesser de les tromper et de les exploiter.

    Ce sont là, Chers Compatriotes, quelques-uns des principes que vous appliquerez sans faille. Vous en trouverez BEAUCOUP D’AUTRES dans des livres et textes qui vous seront remis à la fin de cette séance. Le Roi attache beaucoup d’importance à votre mission. Aussi, a t il décidé de faire tout pour vous la faciliter. Vous jouirez de la très grande protection des administratifs. Vous aurez de l’argent pour vos oeuvres évangéliques et vos déplacements.
    Vous recevrez gratuitement des terrains de construction pour leur mise en valeur, vous pourrez disposer d’une main d’oeuvre gratuite.


    Voilà donc Révérends Pères et Chers Compatriotes, ce que j’ai été prié de vous faire savoir en ce jour.

    Main dans la main, travaillons donc pour la grandeur de notre Chère Patrie.

    (Source : Avenir colonial Belge, 30 octobre 1921)



    P.-S.


    Lire aussi :
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     Le péché du Pape contre l’Afrique d’Assani Fassassi, éd. Al qaram
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     Qui étaient les esclaves brésiliens au 16e siècle ?Transposition pour le Web du travail de Pascal Burquel
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     En mars 1685 est promulguée le « Code noir » par le roi de France Louis XIV
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     Christophe collomb découvre l’amérique : au premier jour d’un ethnocide


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.


    En mars 1685 est promulguée le « Code noir » par le roi de France Louis XIV



    Le Code noir de l’esclavage a été concocté par Colbert, sur les ordres de Louis XIV, au profit des colons, notamment aux Antilles, en Louisiane, en Guyane, à la Réunion... Il a été promulgué en mars 1685. Aboli par la Convention en 1794, l’esclavage fut rétabli en 1802 par Bonaparte et les dispositions du Code noir furent intégrées au Code civil en 1803. C’est un des textes les plus monstrueux de notre histoire.

    Le Code noir de l’esclavage a été concocté par Colbert, sur les ordres de Louis XIV, au profit des colons, notamment aux Antilles, en Louisiane, en Guyane, à la Réunion... Il a été promulgué en mars 1685. Aboli par la Convention en 1794, l’esclavage fut rétabli en 1802 par Bonaparte et les dispositions du Code noir furent intégrées au Code civil en 1803. C’est un des textes les plus monstrueux de notre histoire qui considère que l’humain de race noire n’est qu’une marchandise, qui met en place tout un arsenal répressif avec des sévices sadiques (même s’il aurait été établi pour limiter la cruauté des colons), qui rend criminelle la liberté de l’esclave (mise à mort des marrons, esclaves fugitifs). Et les philosophes soi-disant des Lumières ne se sont même pas insurgés contre ce texte, certains profitant des trafics négriers ...






    Édit du roi sur les esclaves des îles de l’Amérique
    Mars 1685, à Versailles,
    Louis, par la grâce de Dieu roi de France et de Navarre :
    À tous, présents et à venir, salut.

    Préambule

    Comme nous devons également nos soins à tous les peuples que la divine providence a mis sous notre obéissance, nous avons bien voulu faire examiner en notre présence les mémoires qui nous ont été envoyés par nos officiers de nos îles de l’Amérique, par lesquels ayant été informés du besoin qu’ils ont de notre autorité et de notre justice pour y maintenir la discipline de l’église catholique, apostolique et romaine, pour y régler ce qui concerne l’état et la qualité des esclaves dans nos dites îles, et désirant y pourvoir et leur faire connaître qu’encore qu’ils habitent des climats infiniment éloignés de notre séjour ordinaire, nous leur sommes toujours présent, non seulement par l’étendue de notre puissance, mais encore par la promptitude de notre application à les secourir dans leurs nécessités.
    A ces causes, de l’avis de notre conseil, et de certaine science, pleine de puissance et autorité royale, nous avons dit, statué et ordonné, disons, statuons et ordonnons ce qui suit.

    Article 1er

    Voulons que l’édit du feu Roi de Glorieuse Mémoire, notre très honoré seigneur et père, du 23 avril 1615, soit exécuté dans nos îles ; ce faisant, enjoignons à tous nos officiers de chasser de nos dites îles tous les juifs qui y ont établi leur résidence, auxquels, comme aux ennemis déclarés du nom chrétien, nous commandons d’en sortir dans trois moisà compter du jour de la publication des présentes, à peine de confiscation de corps et de biens.

    Article 2

    Tous les esclaves qui seront dans nos îles seront baptisés et instruits dans la religion catholique, apostolique et romaine. Enjoignons aux habitants qui achètent des nègres nouvellement arrivés d’en avertir dans huitaine au plus tard les gouverneur et intendant desdites îles, à peine d’amende arbitraire, lesquels donneront les ordres nécessaires pour les faire instruire et baptiser dans le temps convenable.





    Vente d’esclaves

    Article 3

    Interdisons tout exercice public d’autre religion que la religion catholique, apostolique et romaine. Voulons que les contrevenants soient punis comme rebelles et désobéissants à nos commandements. Défendons toutes assemblées pour cet effet, lesquelles nous déclarons conventicules, illicites et séditieuses, sujettes à la même peine qui aura lieu même contre les maîtres qui lui permettront et souffriront à l’égard de leurs esclaves.

    Article 4

    Ne seront préposés aucuns commandeurs à la direction des nègres, qui ne fassent profession de la religion catholique, apostolique et romaine, à peine de confiscation des dits nègres contre les maîtres qui les auront préposés et de punition arbitraire contre les commandeurs qui auront accepté ladite direction.

    Article 5

    Défendons à nos sujets de la religion protestante d’apporter aucun trouble ni empêchement à nos autres sujets, même à leurs esclaves, dans le libre exercice de la religion catholique, apostolique et romaine, à peine de punition exemplaire.

    Article 6

    Enjoignons à tous nos sujets, de quelque qualité et condition qu’ils soient, d’observer les jours de dimanches et de fêtes, qui sont gardés par nos sujets de la religion catholique, apostolique et romaine. Leur défendons de travailler ni de faire travailler leurs esclaves auxdits jours depuis l’heure de minuit jusqu’à l’autre minuit à la culture de la terre, à la manufacture des sucres et à tous autres ouvrages, à peine d’amende et de punition arbitraire contre les maîtres et confiscation tant des sucres que des esclaves qui seront surpris par nos officiers dans le travail.

    Article 7

    Leur défendons pareillement de tenir le marché des nègres et de toute autre marchandise auxdits jours, sur pareille peine de confiscation des marchandises qui se trouveront alors au marché et d’amende arbitraire contre les marchands.

    Article 8

    Déclarons nos sujets qui ne sont pas de la religion catholique, apostolique et romaine incapables de contracter à l’avenir aucuns mariages valables, déclarons bâtards les enfants qui naîtront de telles conjonctions, que nous voulons être tenues et réputées, tenons et réputons pour vrais concubinages.

    Article 9

    Les hommes libres qui auront eu un ou plusieurs enfants de leur concubinage avec des esclaves, ensemble les maîtres qui les auront soufferts, seront chacun condamnés en une amende de 2000 livres de sucre, et, s’ils sont les maîtres de l’esclave de laquelle ils auront eu lesdits enfants, voulons, outre l’amende, qu’ils soient privés de l’esclave et des enfants et qu’elle et eux soient adjugés à l’hôpital, sans jamais pouvoir être affranchis. N’entendons toutefois le présent article avoir lieu lorsque l’homme libre qui n’était point marié à une autre personne durant son concubinage avec son esclave, épousera dans les formes observées par l’Église ladite esclave, qui sera affranchie par ce moyen et les enfants rendus libres et légitimes.

    Article 10

    Les solennités prescrites par l’ordonnance de Blois et par la Déclaration de 1639 pour les mariages seront observées tant à l’égard des personnes libres que des esclaves, sans néanmoins que le consentement du père et de la mère de l’esclave y soit nécessaire, mais celui du maître seulement.

    Article 11

    Défendons très expressément aux curés de procéder aux mariages des esclaves, s’ils ne font apparoir du consentement de leurs maîtres. Défendons aussi aux maîtres d’user d’aucunes contraintes sur leurs esclaves pour les marier contre leur gré.

    Article 12

    Les enfants qui naîtront des mariages entre esclaves seront esclaves et appartiendront aux maîtres des femmes esclaves et non à ceux de leurs maris, si le mari et la femme ont des maîtres différents.

    Article 13

    Voulons que, si le mari esclave a épousé une femme libre, les enfants, tant mâles que filles, suivent la condition de leur mère et soient libres comme elle, nonobstant la servitude de leur père, et que, si le père est libre et la mère esclave, les enfants soient esclaves pareillement.

    Article 14

    Les maîtres seront tenus de faire enterrer en terre sainte, dans les cimetières destinés à cet effet, leurs esclaves baptisés. Et, à l’égard de ceux qui mourront sans avoir reçu le baptême, ils seront enterrés la nuit dans quelque champ voisin du lieu où ils seront décédés.

    Article 15

    Défendons aux esclaves de porter aucunes armes offensives ni de gros bâtons, à peine de fouet et de confiscation des armes au profit de celui qui les en trouvera saisis, à l’exception seulement de ceux qui sont envoyés à la chasse par leurs maîtres et qui seront porteurs de leurs billets ou marques connus.






    Article 16

    Défendons pareillement aux esclaves appartenant à différents maîtres de s’attrouper le jour ou la nuit sous prétexte de noces ou autrement, soit chez l’un de leurs maîtres ou ailleurs, et encore moins dans les grands chemins ou lieux écartés, à peine de punition corporelle qui ne pourra être moindre que du fouet et de la fleur de lys ; et, en cas de fréquentes récidives et autres circonstances aggravantes, pourront être punis de mort, ce que nous laissons à l’arbitrage des juges. Enjoignons à tous nos sujets de courir sus aux contrevenants, et de les arrêter et de les conduire en prison, bien qu’ils ne soient officiers et qu’il n’y ait contre eux encore aucun décret.

    Article 17

    Les maîtres qui seront convaincus d’avoir permis ou toléré telles assemblées composées d’autres esclaves que de ceux qui leur appartiennent seront condamnés en leurs propres et privés noms de réparer tout le dommage qui aura été fait à leurs voisins à l’occasion desdites assemblées et en 10 écus d’amende pour la première fois et au double en cas de récidive.

    Article 18

    Défendons aux esclaves de vendre des cannes de sucre pour quelque cause et occasion que ce soit, même avec la permission de leurs maîtres, à peine du fouet contre les esclave, de 10 livres tournois contre le maître qui l’aura permis et de pareille amende contre l’acheteur.

    Article 19

    Leur défendons aussi d’exposer en vente au marché ni de porter dans des maisons particulières pour vendre aucune sorte de denrées, même des fruits, légumes, bois à brûler, herbes pour la nourriture des bestiaux et leurs manufactures, sans permission expresse de leurs maîtres par un billet ou par des marques connues ; à peine de revendication des choses ainsi vendues, sans restitution de prix, pour les maîtres et de 6 livres tournois d’amende à leur profit contre les acheteurs.

    Article 20

    Voulons à cet effet que deux personnes soient préposées par nos officiers dans chaque marché pour examiner les denrées et marchandises qui y seront apportées par les esclaves, ensemble les billets et marques de leurs maîtres dont ils seront porteurs.

    Article 21

    Permettons à tous nos sujets habitants des îles de se saisir de toutes les choses dont ils trouveront les esclaves chargés, lorsqu’ils n’auront point de billets de leurs maîtres, ni de marques connues, pour être rendues incessamment à leurs maîtres, si leur habitation est voisine du lieu où leurs esclaves auront été surpris en délit : sinon elles seront incessamment envoyées à l’hôpital pour y être en dépôt jusqu’à ce que les maîtres en aient été avertis.






    Article 22

    Seront tenus les maîtres de faire fournir, par chacune semaine, à leurs esclaves âgés de dix ans et au-dessus, pour leur nourriture, deux pots et demi, mesure de Paris, de farine de manioc, ou trois cassaves pesant chacune 2 livres et demie au moins, ou choses équivalentes, avec 2 livres de boeuf salé, ou 3 livres de poisson, ou autres choses à proportion : et aux enfants, depuis qu’ils sont sevrés jusqu’à l’âge de dix ans, la moitié des vivres ci-dessus.

    Article 23

    Leur défendons de donner aux esclaves de l’eau-de-vie de canne ou guildive, pour tenir lieu de subsistance mentionnée en l’article précédent.

    Article 24

    Leur défendons pareillement de se décharger de la nourriture et subsistance de leurs esclaves en leur permettant de travailler certain jour de la semaine pour leur compte particulier.

    Article 25

    Seront tenus les maîtres de fournir à chaque esclave, par chacun an, deux habits de toile ou quatre aunes de toile, au gré des maîtres.

    Article 26

    Les esclaves qui ne seront point nourris, vêtus et entretenus par leurs maîtres, selon que nous l’avons ordonné par ces présentes, pourront en donner avis à notre procureur général et mettre leurs mémoires entre ses mains, sur lesquels et même d’office, si les avis viennent d’ailleurs, les maîtres seront poursuivis à sa requête et sans frais ; ce que nous voulons être observé pour les crimes et traitements barbares et inhumains des maîtres envers leurs esclaves.

    Article 27

    Les esclaves infirmes par vieillesse, maladie ou autrement, soit que la maladie soit incurable ou non, seront nourris et entretenus par leurs maîtres, et, en cas qu’ils eussent abandonnés, lesdits esclaves seront adjugés à l’hôpital, auquel les maîtres seront condamnés de payer 6 sols par chacun jour, pour la nourriture et l’entretien de chacun esclave.

    Article 28

    Déclarons les esclaves ne pouvoir rien avoir qui ne soit à leurs maîtres ; et tout ce qui leur vient par industrie, ou par la libéralité d’autres personnes, ou autrement, à quelque titre que ce soit, être acquis en pleine propriété à leurs maîtres, sans que les enfants des esclaves, leurs pères et mères, leurs parents et tous autres y puissent rien prétendre par successions, dispositions entre vifs ou à cause de mort ; lesquelles dispositions nous déclarons nulles, ensemble toutes les promesses et obligations qu’ils auraient faites, comme étant faites par gens incapables de disposer et contracter de leur chef.

    Article 29

    Voulons néanmoins que les maîtres soient tenus de ce que leurs esclaves auront fait par leur commandement, ensemble de ce qu’ils auront géré et négocié dans les boutiques, et pour l’espèce particulière de commerce à laquelle leurs maîtres les auront préposés, et au cas que leurs maîtres ne leur aient donné aucun ordre et ne les aient point préposés, ils seront tenus seulement jusqu’à concurrence de ce qui aura tourné à leur profit, et, si rien n’a tourné au profit des maîtres, le pécule desdits esclaves que les maîtres leur auront permis d’avoir en sera tenu, après que les maîtres en auront déduit par préférence ce qui pourra leur être dû ; sinon que le pécule consistât en tout ou partie en marchandises, dont les esclaves auraient permission de faire trafic à part, sur lesquelles leurs maîtres viendront seulement par contribution au sol la livre avec les autres créanciers.

    Article 30

    Ne pourront les esclaves être pourvus d’office ni de commission ayant quelque fonction publique, ni être constitués agents par autres que leurs maîtres pour gérer et administrer aucun négoce, ni être arbitres, experts ou témoins, tant en matière civile que criminelle : et en cas qu’ils soient ouïs en témoignage, leur déposition ne servira que de mémoire pour aider les juges à s’éclairer d’ailleurs, sans qu’on en puisse tire aucune présomption, ni conjoncture, ni adminicule de preuve.

    Article 31

    Ne pourront aussi les esclaves être parties ni être (sic) en jugement en matière civile, tant en demandant qu’en défendant, ni être parties civiles en matière criminelle, sauf à leurs maîtres d’agir et défendre en matière civile et de poursuivre en matière criminelle la réparation des outrages et excès qui auront été contre leurs esclaves.

    Article 32

    Pourront les esclaves être poursuivis criminellement, sans qu’il soit besoin de rendre leurs maîtres partie, (sinon) en cas de complicité : et seront les esclaves accusés, jugés en première instance par les juges ordinaires et par appel au Conseil souverain, sur la même instruction et avec les mêmes formalités que les personnes libres.






    Article 33

    L’esclave qui aura frappé son maître, sa maîtresse ou le mari de sa maîtresse, ou leurs enfants avec contusion ou effusion de sang, ou au visage, sera puni de mort.

    Article 34

    Et quant aux excès et voies de fait qui seront commis par les esclaves contre les personnes libres, voulons qu’ils soient sévèrement punis, même de mort, s’il y échet.

    Article 35

    Les vols qualifiés, même ceux de chevaux, cavales, mulets, boeufs ou vaches, qui auront été faits par les esclaves ou par les affranchis, seront punis de peines afflictives, même de mort, si le cas le requiert.

    Article 36

    Les vols de moutons, chèvres, cochons, volailles, canne à sucre, pois, mil, manioc ou autres légumes, faits par les esclaves, seront punis selon la qualité du vol, par les juges qui pourront, s’il y échet, les condamner d’être battus de verges par l’exécuteur de la haute justice et marqués d’une fleur de lys.

    Article 37

    Seront tenus les maîtres, en cas de vol ou d’autre dommage causé par leurs esclaves, outre la peine corporelle des esclaves, de réparer le tort en leur nom, s’ils n’aiment mieux abandonner l’esclave à celui auquel le tort a été fait ; ce qu’ils seront tenus d’opter dans trois jours, à compter de celui de la condamnation, autrement ils en seront déchus.

    Article 38

    L’esclave fugitif qui aura été en fuite pendant un mois, à compter du jour que son maître l’aura dénoncé en justice, aura les oreilles coupées et sera marqué d’une fleur de lis une épaule ; s’il récidive un autre mois pareillement du jour de la dénonciation, il aura le jarret coupé, et il sera marqué d’une fleur de lys sur l’autre épaule ; et, la troisième fois, il sera puni de mort.

    Article 39

    Les affranchis qui auront donné retraite dans leurs maisons aux esclaves fugitifs, seront condamnés par corps envers les maîtres en l’amende de 300 livres de sucre par chacun jour de rétention, et les autres personnes libres qui leur auront donné pareille retraite, en 10 livres tournois d’amende par chacun jour de rétention.

    Article 40

    L’esclave sera puni de mort sur la dénonciation de son maître non complice du crime dont il aura été condamné sera estimé avant l’exécution par deux des principaux habitants de l’île, qui seront nommés d’office par le juge, et le prix de l’estimation en sera payé au maître ; et, pour à quoi satisfaire, il sera imposé par l’intendant sur chacune tête de nègre payant droits la somme portée par l’estimation, laquelle sera régalé sur chacun desdits nègres et levée par le fermier du domaine royal pour éviter à frais.

    Article 41

    Défendons aux juges, à nos procureurs et aux greffiers de prendre aucune taxe dans les procès criminels contre les esclaves, à peine de concussion.

    Article 42

    Pourront seulement les maîtres, lorsqu’ils croiront que leurs esclaves l’auront mérité les faire enchaîner et les faire battre de verges ou cordes. Leur défendons de leur donner la torture, ni de leur faire aucune mutilation de membres,à peine de confiscation des esclaves et d’être procédé contre les maîtres extraordinairement.

    Article 43

    Enjoignons à nos officiers de poursuivre criminellement les maîtres ou les commandeurs qui auront tué un esclave étant sous leur puissance ou sous leur direction et de punir le meurtre selon l’atrocité des circonstances ; et, en cas qu’il y ait lieu à l’absolution, permettons à nos officiers de renvoyer tant les maîtres que les commandeurs absous, sans qu’ils aient besoin d’obtenir de nous Lettres de grâce.

    Article 44

    Déclarons les esclaves être meubles et comme tels entrer dans la communauté, n’avoir point de suite par hypothèque, se partager également entre les cohéritiers, sans préciput et droit d’aînesse, n’être sujets au douaire coutumier, au retrait féodal et lignager, aux droits féodaux et seigneuriaux, aux formalités des décrets, ni au retranchement des quatre quints, en cas de disposition à cause de mort et testamentaire.

    Article 45

    N’entendons toutefois priver nos sujets de la faculté de les stipuler propres à leurs personnes et aux leurs de leur côté et ligne, ainsi qu’il se pratique pour les sommes de deniers et autres choses mobiliaires.

    Article 46

    Seront dans les saisies des esclaves observées les formes prescrites par nos ordonnances et les coutumes pour les saisies des choses mobiliaires. Voulons que les deniers en provenant soient distribués par ordre de saisies ; ou, en cas de déconfiture, au sol la livre, après que les dettes privilégié auront été payées et généralement que la condition des esclaves soit réglée en toutes affaires comme celle des autres choses mobiliaires, aux exceptions suivantes.

    Article 47

    Ne pourront être saisis et vendus séparément le mari, la femme et leurs enfants impubères, s’ils sont tous sous la puissance d’un même maître ; déclarons nulles les saisies et ventes séparées qui en seront faites ; ce que nous voulons avoir lieu dans les aliénations volontaires, sous peine, contre ceux qui feront les aliénations, d’être privés de celui ou de ceux qu’ils auront gardés, qui seront adjugés aux acquéreurs, sans qu’ils soient tenus de faire aucun supplément de prix.

    Article 48

    Ne pourront aussi les esclaves travaillant actuellement dans les sucreries, indigoteries et habitations, âgés de quatorze ans et au-dessus jusqu’à soixante ans, être saisis pour dettes, sinon pour ce qui sera dû du prix de leur achat, ou que la sucrerie, indigoterie, habitation, dans laquelle ils travaillent soit saisie réellement ; défendons, à peine de nullité, de procéder par saisie réelle et adjudication par décret sur les sucreries, indigoteries et habitations, sans y comprendre les nègres de l’âge susdit y travaillant actuellement.





    Travail de la canne à sucre

    Article 49

    Le fermier judiciaire des sucreries, indigoteries, ou habitations saisies réellement conjointement avec les esclaves, sera tenu de payer le prix entier de son bail, sans qu’il puisse compter parmi les fruits qu’il perçoit les enfants qui seront nés des esclaves pendant son bail.

    Article 50

    Voulons, nonobstant toutes conventions contraires, que nous déclarons nulles, que lesdits enfants appartiennent à la partie saisie, si les créanciers sont satisfaits d’ailleurs, ou à l’adjudicataire, s’il intervient un décret ; et, à cet effet, il sera fait mention dans la dernière affiche, avant l’interposition du décret, desdits enfants nés esclaves depuis la saisie réelle. Il sera fait mention, dans la même affiche, des esclaves décédés depuis la saisie réelle dans laquelle ils étaient compris.

    Article 51

    Voulons, pour éviter aux frais et aux longueurs des procédures, que la distribution du prix entier de l’adjudication conjointe des fonds et des esclaves, et de ce qui proviendra du prix des baux judiciaires, soit faite entre les créanciers selon l’ordre de leurs privilèges et hypothèques, sans distinguer ce qui est pour le prix des fonds d’avec ce qui est pour le prix des esclaves.

    Article 52

    Et néanmoins les droits féodaux et seigneuriaux ne seront payés qu’à proportion du prix des fonds.

    Article 53

    Ne seront reçus les lignagers et seigneurs féodaux à retirer les fonds décrétés, s’ils ne retirent les esclaves vendus conjointement avec fonds ni l’adjudicataire à retenir les esclaves sans les fonds.

    Article 54

    Enjoignons aux gardiens nobles et bourgeois usufruitiers, amodiateurs et autres jouissants des fonds auxquels sont attachés des esclaves qui y travaillent, de gouverner lesdits esclaves comme bons pères de famille, sans qu’ils soient tenus, après leur administration finie, de rendre le prix de ceux qui seront décédés ou diminués par maladie, vieillesse ou autrement, sans leur faute, et sans qu’ils puissent aussi retenir comme fruits à leur profit les enfants nés desdits esclaves durant leur administration, lesquels nous voulons être conservés et rendus à ceux qui en sont maîtres et les propriétaires.

    Article 55

    Les maîtres âgés de vingt ans pourront affranchir leurs esclaves par tous actes vifs ou à cause de mort, sans qu’ils soient tenus de rendre raison de l’affranchissement, ni qu’ils aient besoin d’avis de parents, encore qu’ils soient mineurs de vingt-cinq ans.

    Article 56

    Les esclaves qui auront été fait légataires universels par leurs maîtres ou nommés exécuteurs de leurs testaments ou tuteurs de leurs enfants, seront tenus et réputés, les tenons et réputons pour affranchis.

    Article 57

    Déclarons leurs affranchissements faits dans nos îles, leur tenir lieu de naissance dans nosdites îles et les esclaves affranchis n’avoir besoin de nos lettres de naturalité pour jouir des avantages de nos sujets naturels de notre royauté, terres et pays de notre obéissance, encore qu’ils soient nés dans les pays étrangers.

    Article 58

    Commandons aux affranchis de porter un respect singulier à leurs anciens maîtres, à leurs veuves et à leurs enfants, en sorte que l’injure qu’ils leur auront faite soit punie plus grièvement que si elle était faite à une autre personne : les déclarons toutefois francs et quittes envers eux de toutes autres charges, services et droits utiles que leurs anciens maîtres voudraient prétendre tant sur leurs personnes que sur leurs biens et successions en qualité de patrons.

    Article 59

    Octroyons aux affranchis les mêmes droits, privilèges et immunités dont jouissent les personnes nées libres ; voulons que le mérite d’une liberté acquise produise en eux, tant pour leurs personnes que pour leurs biens, les mêmes effets que le bonheur de la liberté naturelle cause à nos autres sujets.

    Article 60

    Déclarons les confiscations et les amendes qui n’ont point de destination particulière, par ces présentes nous appartenir, pour être payées à ceux qui sont préposés à la recette de nos droits et de nos revenus ; voulons néanmoins que distraction soit faite du tiers desdites confiscations et amendes au profit de l’hôpital établi dans l’île où elles auront été adjugées.

    Si donnons l’ordre à nos aimés et loyaux gens tenant notre conseil souverain établi à la Martinique, Guadeloupe, Saint-Christophe, que ces présentes ils aient à les faire lire, publier et enregistrer, et le contenu en elles garder et observer de point en point selon leur forme et teneur, sans contrevenir ni permettre qu’il y soit contrevenu en quelque sorte et manière que ce soit, nonobstant tous édits, déclarations, arrêts et usages, auxquels nous avons dérogé et dérogeons par ces dites présentes, car tel est notre plaisir.
    Et enfin que ce soit chose ferme et stable à toujours, nous y avons fait mettre notre sceau.

    Donné à Versailles au mois de mars 1685.
    Signé : Louis le quatorzième.








    Publiez !

    Comment publier sur Rebellyon.info?

    Rebellyon.info n’est pas un collectif de rédaction, c’est un outil qui permet la publication d’articles que vous proposez. La proposition d’article se fait à travers l’interface privée du site. Quelques infos rapides pour comprendre comment être publié !
    Si vous rencontrez le moindre problème, n’hésitez pas à nous le faire savoir
    via le mail contact [at] rebellyon.info





    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for david Sassoon

    THE SASSOONS: AKA"THE ROTHSCHILDS OF THE EAST"
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
     By Mike King

    There once was a wealthy Jew named David Sassoon --- who, like his father, had served as treasurer to the pashas (governors) of Ottoman-ruled Baghdad (in modern day Iraq). Eventually, the people and a new pasha turned against the Jewish money manipulators (surprise surprise). In the early 1830's -- as the result of a corruption scandal -- David and his brother Joseph left "anti-Semitic" Baghdad to seek new scams in new lands.
    Joseph Sassoon settled in the city of Aleppo (modern day Syria)where he established a merchant house. Later on, his business interests spread to Alexandria, Thessaloniki, and Athens, which included a shipping company and a money exchange house. His five sons later branched out in different directions.
    But it was David -- who led the community's exodus to Bombay (now known as Mumbai, India) -- that established the branch of the Sassoon Family which was to rank among the wealthiest and most respected and influential dynasties in the world. Though David Sassoon and his eight sons profited handsomely from several different types of businesses. They made a fortune in textiles; but the trade which really raked in the shekels for the new "Indians" later dubbed "the Rothschilds of the East" was in selling opium, aka narcotics, aka "dope" in China.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for jews expelled
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for david Sassoon
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for david Sassoon
    1. The ancestors of the Jewish Sassoon Family had been expelled from the Iberian Peninsula (Spain / Portugal) 300 years before David had been born. The Ottoman Turkish Empire welcomed the banished Jews. But when the Sassoons became embroiled in a corruption scandal, it was time for David and Joseph to pack up and leave again -- this time, for India and Syria respectively. // 2 & 3. David Sassoon later founded Sassoon & Sons -- a mighty financial and political operation which later expanded to the trafficking of opium to China.

    *

     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for sassoon synagogue india
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for mumbai jews
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for david sassoon tomb
    1. Massive synagogue in Mumbai, India --- built by the Sassoon Crime Family. // 2. There are still 4,000 Jews and 10 synagogues in Mumbai. // 3. The massive tomb of the famously ostentatious David Sassoon -- in India.
    THE FIRST OPIUM WAR (1839-1842)

    The First Opium War was fought between the United Kingdom and the Qing dynasty of China, mainly over the trade in opium. The privately owned British East India Company, (cough cough, Rothschild, cough cough)had been growing opium in India and smuggling it into China illegally. The influx of narcotics reversed the trade surplus which China had enjoyed while creating millions of opium addicts. Understandably, Chinese officials were not pleased about the British India-China opium trade.
    In 1839, the Emperor instructed viceroy Lin Zexu to stop the trade. To that end, Lin wrote a letter to British Queen Victoria appealing to her moral responsibility to stop the opium trade. Little did the viceroy know that by that time, Queen Victoria was already just a figurehead. It was Rothschild and his ilk that ruled Britannia. There was no response to the letter.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for indo china opium trade
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for opium pipe chinese
    1. Coat of Arms for the private company / military force --  The British East India Company // 2. The trade routes from India to China. // 3. There's a LOT of shekels in dope!

    *
    Finally, Lin resorted to force by confiscating all supplies and ordering a blockade of foreign ships and confiscation of their cargoes of opium. The British Rothschild government responded by dispatching its sophisticated heavy gunboats to defeat those of the Chinese. The Chinese were forced to sign the Treaty of Nanking in 1842 --- which granted treaty ports to foreign merchants, imposed reparations, and ceded Hong Kong Island to the British Empire.

    Thanks to that unjust war, by the 1840's, Sassoon and sons came to dominate the opium trade between India and China. Branching out from Bombay, the drug smuggling low-lives established operations in some of the Chinese port cities which the British now controlled --- Shangai, Hong Kong and Canton. In time, Shangai would become notorious for its opium use, prostitution and other vices. The dope, and the shekels, were really flowing now!
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for chinese on opium cartoon
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for opium war

    1. French political cartoon from 1840 depicts an Englishman ordering the emperor to buy opium as a dead Chinaman lays on the floor. The caption reads: "We want you to poison yourself completely because we need a lot of yea in order to digest our beef." // 2. Another cartoon: Englishman pouring opium down Chinaman's throat. // 3. British gunboats gave the British an advantage -- hence the term "gunboat diplomacy."
    *
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for treaty nanking
    The terms of the Treaty of Nanking humiliated and weakened China  --- buy pleased the Sassoon gangsters.
    THE SECOND OPIUM WAR (1856-1860)
    Resentment over the humiliating Treaty of Nanking and continued concern and hatred over an opium trade that was, by this time, completely dominated by the Sassoons, the Chinese again rose up against British (Rothschild) imperialism. Again, the British (this time joined by Rothschild France) -- would be victorious.
    The 2nd Opium War resulted in the Treaty of Tientsin in 1858, which was even more unjust and humiliating than the previous treaty. The Treaty:
    • Imposed reparations upon China for the expenses of the recent war.
    • Ten more ports were forced open to European control
    • The opium trade was legalized
    • China was forced to admit foreign traders and missionaries
    Both in the short term and in the long run, these events were very bad for once-prosperous China; but very good for the drug-dealing Sassoons and the money-lending / stock-owning Rothschilds.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for opium war 2nd
    Another war -- the same result.
    THE SASSOONS BECOME "ENGLISHMEN" 
    As easily as David had gone from being an "Arab" to an "Indian," so too did his son Abdullah (born in Baghdad) transition from "Indian" to being an 'Englishman." He simply changed his first name to Albert, moved to London, and was granted he title of "Baronette." The son of David -- also a drig dealer -- was now "Sir" Albert Sassoon.
    "Sir" Albert's title passed on to his son, "Sir" Edward Sassoon. The 2nd Baronette became most noteworthy for serving as a member of the British Parliament and marrying Aline Caroline de Rothschild -- the grand daughter of "nobleman"James de Rothschild(Paris branch) and great grand daughter of Rothschild partriarch Mayer Amschel. She was known as, "Lady Sassoon."The Sassoons and the Rothschilds -- a marriage of money-grubbing families from hell. The titled couple spawned "Sir" Philip Sassoon, 3rd Baronet -- who also held a seat in Parliament.
    From the late 1800's until 1903, Rachel Beer (a Sassoon), also owned two influential newspapers -- The Sunday Times and The Observer -- both left-leaning, of course.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for baronette sassoon
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for baronette sassoon
      Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for baronette sassoon
     
    Patriarch David spawned three generations of "English" Barons / politicians which took the Sassoons into the 20th Century. The 2nd Baronet married a Rothschild.
    Other Sassoon cousins made their mark in business and "philanthropy" --- which is how elite criminals buy influence and status -- and some ended up in New York. Unlike the undying influence of the Rothschilds, the Sassoons, though still with us, fizzled about 50 years ago.
    But the evil deeds inflicted upon 19th Century China by "the West"(cough cough) are still remembered as what the Chinese refer to as "the Century of Humiliation."As it was with the African slave trade and the Iraq war, elite Jews do the oppressing -- and "white westerners" get the full historical blame. The Italian-based American poet Ezra Pound -- who ended up being wrongly committed to an American insane asylum for 7 years after World War II -- best summed up this dynamic during a wartime radio address aimed at Britain:
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for ezra pound
    .
    "It is an outrage that any nice young man from the suburbs should be expected to die for Victor Sassoon. It is an outrage that any drunken footman's byblow (bastard child) should be asked to die for Sassoon. You can not touch a sore or a shame in your empire but you find a Mond, a Sassoon, or aGoldsmid. You have no race left in your government."  
    Tell it, Mr. Pound. Tell it!
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for chinese on opium
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for chinese on opium
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for century of humiliation


    1 & 2. Sassoon's doped-up Chinamen of the late 19th / early 20th Century. // 3. The Chinese remember the humiliation -- but do they know about the Sassoons?



    AL YAHUD NATHANIEL - FREE IS THE TRUE JEW - LIBRE EST LE VRAI JUIF



    Musique Le cinquième soleil
    par
    LOGOS (Stephen Sicard)
    Album SYMBIOSE
        
     Ce teste est inspiré par la souffrance d'un Être Cher...
    qui est un peu comme mon Fils Adoptif 
    et dont je suis fière d'être l'Amie...
    Chargement long pour la musique... soyez patients...

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    A Nathaniel...

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Libre est le Vrai juif. Qu'il soit juif sans le savoir ou juif sans le vouloir. Enfant de l'Univers il est. Liberté se nomme sa mère. Un homme né libre. Prêt à mourir pour le rester. Sans dieu ni maître. Sans chaînes. Sans esclaves. Au fond de lui danse un ciel étoilé où se fondaient les yeux des ancêtres millénaires... juste avant de dormir. Seulement riche d'un horizon illimité pour caresser l'immensité. Sa Mission est d'arpenter le monde... des éclats de soleil explosant son  regard pour tous les malheureux. La main tendue vers eux... si beaux dans leur différence. Si parfaits dans leur réciprocité. Si méritants d'être aimés. Comprendre. Partager. Donner.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Voilà le Juif dont je rêve... en regardant les bombes pleuvoir sur Gaza comme il pleut des larmes de sang dans mes yeux. Tant de douleur. Tant de souffrance. J'agonise en hurlant. Aaah... Tendre les mains à la multitude et lui dire... je T'aime. Je T'aime. Oh... je T'aime. Mais j'ai le coeur si déchiré. En lambeaux. Et les poings si serrés. Avec un désir fou de leur régler leur compte. Les tuer tous... ces traîtres à l'Idéal du Vrai juif. Les tuer tous, ces faucheurs d'innocence. Les tuer tous. Et marcher enfin vers mon destin. Vous tendre la main. Vous serrer fort contre mon coeur. Mêler mes larmes aux votres. Et vous demander pardon pour tant de mal... tant d'horreurs commis par les assassins... en mon nom. Pardon. Pardon. Oh... Pardon.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Libre est le Vrai juif. Ce juif-là que nul ne peut endoctriner ni soumettre. Asservi à personne et à rien. Ni aux religieux ni aux idéologues. Que nul ne peut river à la moindre parcelle de terre parce que partout chez lui... il est. Universel. Rêvant d'une maison sans portes ni fenêtres où pourraient entrer tous les frères perdus. Bafoués. Battus. Dans un monde cruel où les règles de l'Hospitalité auraient peut-être cours. Où... un rempart de mon corps je ferai... entre l'Ami protégé et l'Ennemi rengainant son arme et repartant... respectueux du code d'honneur. Mais l'Honneur est un mot ignoré chez les barbares aimant le goût du fiel et du sang à Gaza ou ailleurs. Ils sont fermés à tout ce qui pourrait les rendre un peu meilleurs. Ils préfèrent le pire. Persécutent le faible. Ricanent en opprimant. Leur coeur froid comme la mort ressemble à ces prisons construites de leurs mains d'où s'échappent tant de cris qui lacèrent mes nuits. Ils n'ont rien à offrir. Que du chaos, des larmes. Des détesteurs d'humanité violant sans relâche le contrat signé par les étoiles aux aïeux millénaires. Aime ton prochain comme toi-même...
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Je comprends mieux pourquoi  Ieschoua est mort crucifié en Palestine. Ses adversaires étaient les mêmes que les miens. Il était libre comme un Vrai juif. Ni à acheter ni à vendre. Brûlait en lui le sens du Sacré que ne possédaient pas les Imposteurs prostitués à Mammon. Les traitres au Vrai juif sont les mêmes aujourd'hui. Leur couteau est planté au plus profond de mon coeur.  Indicible la souffrance éprouvée pour le malheur de toutes les victimes sacrifiées à l'autel des apostats. Et violente la haine ressentie devant tant de cruauté. Tant de mépris. Tant d'arrogance. Un Vrai juif ne peut être ainsi. Il aime trop la Lumière pour vendre son Âme à l'Ombre.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Libre est le Vrai juif. Libre de donner pour le plaisir de voir naître un sourire. Libre d'Aimer jusqu'à se confondre avec tous les êtres. Libre à mourir pour te sortir de ta servitude. Libre. Si libre. Si rebelle. Rêvant de fracasser tous les murs. Toutes les frontières. Toutes les têtes de tortionnaires pour ne plus que tes cris me fassent hurler à mort. A mort. A mort les tyrans.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Que tombent du ciel les étoiles de mes ancêtres millénaires pour éclairer l'abîme insondable creusé par les renégats. Que s'ouvrent les sentiers de feu où brûlèrent tes pas, ô mon Frère... Toi vers qui les mains se tendaient. Toi qui rendais le soleil volé aux malheureux par les menteurs. Toi, guérisseur d'Âme... briseur de chaînes... Porteur de Liberté... Toi, tu incarnais le vrai Juif. Ce Juif-là exemplaire pour qui l'on ne ressent qu'Amour infini tant il apporte de paix sereine. Pas comme ces meurtriers crucifiant de honte le Vrai juif au mur de leurs ignominies. Prenant un sadique plaisir à souiller son image. A le déshonorer. Des engeances malfaisantes. Lâches. Méprisables. Prisonniers de leur haine et qui n'ont pas compris que libre est le Vrai juif.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Libre est le Vrai juif... comme le vent soufflant dans le désert brûlant de mes ancêtres millénaires. Ceux qui rêvaient pour moi d'un paradis sur terre et parlaient à la lune pour calmer leurs souffrances. Avec comme fortune leur coeur en bandoulière et leur regard profond... captivant... pour les femmes. Aimer... dormir... partir. 



    Aller toujours plus loin pour éclairer le monde. Le rendre pacifique. Toujours plus bleu. Ne jamais rester sourd aux appels déchirants des êtres persécutés. Prendre parti pour eux comme un homme d'Honneur... verser même mon sang pour défendre ce frère quelque que soit sa couleur. Son pays. Sa croyance. Lui donner ma vie. Peut-être... le sauver. Fier d'être ce Juif-là capable de mourir pour un noble Idéal et lire dans tes yeux noyés de pluie, mon Amour... queje fus digne d'être Aimé de toi... juste avant de rejoindre mes ancêtres millénaires. Un juif Libre. Un Vrai juif.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Tableau de Raymond Salter  
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.


    Page réalisée par Adriana Evangelizt

    Libre est le Vrai juif poème d'Adriana Evangelizt
    Poésie Cosmique
    par Adriana Evangelizt
    Site réalisé par Adriana Evangelizt
    Poète Rebelle Engagée
    Hermetiste


     Amour cosmique - Adriana Evangelizt - Poésie cosmique - Adriana Evangelizt - Poète rebelle -









    VOLTAIRE - MUHAMMAD ET L'ISLAM - Religion sage, sévère, chaste et humaine. Alter Info 2011

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Comment Voltaire devint favorable à l'Islam


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    RELIGIONS ET CROYANCES

    Comment Voltaire devint favorable à l'Islam

    https://www.alterinfo.net/Comment-Voltaire-devint-favorable-a-l-Islam_a55344.html

    Au départ, Voltaire était très hostile à l’islam. La pièce théâtrale « Mahomet, ou le fanatisme » composée en 1742, était considérée comme le parfait exemple pour dépeindre le personnage du Prophète Mohammed (SBDL).

    Vendredi 18 Février 2011

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Comment Voltaire devint favorable à l'Islam

    « Mahomet le fanatique, le cruel, le fourbe, et, à la honte des hommes, le grand, qui de garçon marchand devient prophète, législateur et monarque. »  
    Recueil des Lettres de Voltaire (1739-41)
     
    Goethe, qui avait traduit la pièce en allemand pour complaire à son maître, le prince Charles-Auguste de Weimar, parla de ce sujet à Napoléon qu’il rencontra à Erfut. L’Empereur rétorqua : 

    « Je n’aime pas cette pièce, c’est une caricature !
    - Je suis de l’avis de Votre Majesté, j’ai fait ce travail à contre-cœur. Mais dans cette tragédie, dans ces tirades contre le fanatisme, ce n’est pas l’islam qui était visé, mais l’Église catholique.
    - Les allusions, dit Napoléon, sont tellement voilées que cet impertinent a pu dédier son œuvre au pape… qui lui a donné sa bénédiction.» (1).
     
    Mais au fur et à mesure, Voltaire va faire ses recherches personnelles et délaisser les vieux ouvrages sur les musulmans que propageaient l’église. Voltaire se détache des sources héritées du Moyen Âge et sa perspective change radicalement.
     
    C’est en travaillant en véritable historien, sur son Charles XII, que Voltaire forgea ses idées sur le monde musulman et plus particulièrement sur les Ottomans. L’évolution de Voltaire sur l’islam arrive à son point culminant avec l’Examen important de milord Bolingbroke, ou le tombeau du fanatisme, intégré au Recueil nécessaire, en 1766. Dans cet écrit, il fustige sévèrement le christianisme et fait l’éloge du Prophète Mohammed (SBDL) qui établit un culte qui « était sans doute, plus sensé que le christianisme».
     
    Voltaire accuse et attaque le christianisme qu’il considère comme « la plus ridicule, la plus absurde et la plus sanglante religion qui ait jamais infecté le monde. » (Lettre à Frédéric II, roi de Prusse, datée du 5 janvier 1767). Par contraste, il vante la doctrine musulmane pour sa grande simplicité : « Il n’y a qu’un Dieu et Mahomet est son prophète. »
     
    « Chanoines, moines, curés même, dit Voltaire, si on vous imposait la loi de ne manger ni boire depuis quatre heures du matin jusqu’à dix heures du soir, pendant le mois de juillet, lorsque le carême arriverait dans ce temps ; si on vous défendait de jouer à aucun jeu de hasard sous peine de damnation ; si le vin vous était interdit sous la même peine ; s’il vous fallait faire un pèlerinage dans des déserts brûlants ; s’il vous était enjoint de donner au moins deux et demi pour cent de votre revenu aux pauvres ; si, accoutumés à jouir de dix-huit femmes, on vous en retranchait tout d’un coup quatorze; en bonne foi, oseriez-vous appeler cette religion sensuelle ? » 
     
    Et la fin de son article est une leçon qui déteste et rejette la caricature : « Il faut combattre sans cesse. Quand on a détruit une erreur, il se trouve toujours quelqu’un qui la ressuscite.» (dictionnaire philosophique 1764) 
     
    La dernière phase de Voltaire sur l’Islam se situe entre 1768 et 1772. Il revient sur certaines de ses positions intransigeantes concernant le christianisme, sans renoncer à ses convictions dans l’enseignement de l’Islam :  
     
    « Sa religion est sage, sévère, chaste et humaine : sage puisqu’elle ne tombe pas dans la démence de donner à Dieu des associés, et qu’elle n’a point de mystère ; sévère puisqu’elle défend les jeux de hasard, le vin et les liqueurs fortes, et qu’elle ordonne la prière cinq fois par jour ; chaste, puisqu’elle réduit à quatre femmes ce nombre prodigieux d’épouses qui partageaient le lit de tous les princes de l’Orient ; humaine, puisqu’elle nous ordonne l’aumône, bien plus rigoureusement que le voyage de La Mecque. Ajoutez à tous ces caractères de vérité, la tolérance. »
     
    Depuis 1742, date à laquelle Voltaire a présenté sa pièce de théâtre « Mahomet »à la Comédie française, le chemin parcouru est long. Ce jour-là, il attaquait « le fondateur de l’Islam » pour montrer comment les religions ont été établies. Puis vingt-huit années plus tard, en 1770, il le défend pour soutenir que « d’autres peuples pouvaient penser mieux que les habitants de ce petit tas de boue que nous appelons Europe ».
    « Il n’y a point de religion dans laquelle on n’ait recommandé l’aumône. La mahométane est la seule qui en ait fait un précepte légal, positif, indispensable. L’Alcoran [le Coran] ordonne de donner deux et demi pour cent de son revenu, soit en argent, soit en denrées. La prohibition de tous les jeux de hasard est peut-être la seule loi dont on ne peut trouver d’exemple dans aucune religion.
    Toutes ces lois qui, à la polygamie près, sont si austères, et sa doctrine qui est si simple, attirèrent bientôt à la religion, le respect et la confiance. Le dogme surtout de l’unité d’un Dieu présenté sans mystère, et proportionné à l’intelligence humaine, rangea sous sa loi une foule de nations et, jusqu’à des nègres dans l’Afrique, et à des insulaires dans l’Océan indien. 

    Le peu que je viens de dire dément bien tout ce que nos historiens, nos déclamateurs et nos préjugés nous disent : mais la vérité doit les combattre.»
    (2)
     
    Le plus grand changement que l’opinion ait produit sur notre globe fut l’établissement de la religion de Mahomet. Ses musulmans, en moins d’un siècle, conquirent un empire plus vaste que l’empire romain. Cette révolution, si grande pour nous, n’est, à la vérité, que comme un atome qui a changé de place dans l’immensité des choses, et dans le nombre innombrable de mondes qui remplissent l’espace; mais c’est au moins un événement qu’on doit regarder comme une des roues de la machine de l’univers, et comme un effet nécessaire des lois éternelles et immuables: car peut-il arriver quelque chose qui n’ait été déterminé par le Maître de toutes choses? Rien n’est que ce qui doit être. (3) 
     
    Ce fut certainement un très grand homme, et qui forma de grands hommes. Il fallait qu’il fût martyr ou conquérant, il n’y avait pas de milieu. Il vainquit toujours, et toutes ses victoires furent remportées par le petit nombre sur le grand. Conquérant, législateur, monarque et pontife, il joua le plus grand rôle qu’on puisse jouer sur la terre aux yeux du commun des hommes. (4)
     
    J’ai dit qu’on reconnut Mahomet pour un grand homme; rien n’est plus impie, dites-vous. Je vous répondrai que ce n’est pas ma faute si ce petit homme a changé la face d’une partie du monde, s’il a gagné des batailles contre des armées dix fois plus nombreuses que les siennes, s’il a fait trembler l’empire romain, s’il a donné les premiers coups à ce colosse que ses successeurs ont écrasé, et s’il a été législateur de l’Asie, de l’Afrique, et d’une partie de l’Europe. (5)
      • Jean Prieur, Muhammad, Prophète d’Orient et d’Occident, Éditions du Rocher, Paris 2003, p 215.
      • Voltaire, Essai sur les mœurs.
      • « Remarque pour servir de supplément à l'Essai sur les Mœurs » (1763), dans Oeuvres complètes de Voltaire, Voltaire, éd. Moland, 1875, t. 24, chap. IX-De Mahomet, p. 588
      • « Remarque pour servir de supplément à l'Essai sur les Mœurs » (1763), dans Oeuvres complètes de Voltaire,
      • Voltaire a composé cette lettre en 1760 en réponse à la "Critique de l’Histoire universelle de M. de Voltaire, au sujet de Mahomet et du mahométisme"
    SOURCE

    Vendredi 18 Février 2011



    1.Posté par rayan le 18/02/2011 12:54 | Alerter

    « Si la grandeur du dessein, la petitesse des moyens, l’immensité du résultat sont les trois mesures du génie de l’homme, qui osera comparer humainement un grand homme de l’histoire moderne à Mohammed ? Les plus fameux n’ont remué que des armes, des lois, des empires ; ils n’ont fondé (quand ils ont fondé quelque chose) que des puissances matérielles écroulées souvent avant eux.
    Celui-là a remué des armées, des législations, des empires, des peuples, des dynasties, des millions d’hommes sur le tiers du globe habité : mais il a remué, de plus des autels, des dieux, des religions, des idées, des croyances, des âmes ; il a fondé, sur un livre dont chaque lettre est devenue loi, une nationalité spirituelle qui englobe des peuples de toute race, et il a imprimé, pour caractère indélébile de cette nationalité musulmane, la haine des idoles et la passion du dieu unique. Ce patriotisme, vengeur des profanations du ciel, fut la vertu des enfants de Mohammed. L’idée de l’unité de Dieu, proclamée dans la lassitude des théogonies fabuleuses, avait elle-même une telle vertu, qu’en faisant explosion sur ses lèvres, elle incendia tous les vieux temples des idoles et alluma de ses lueurs un tiers du monde. »

    Alphonse Lamartine
    Dans la même rubrique:

    Dimanche 13 Janvier 2019 - 12:44

     Projet sioniste: La mosquée Al Aqsa va être détruite…

     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Projet sioniste: La mosquée Al Aqsa va être détruite…

      https://www.alterinfo.net/Projet-sioniste-La-mosquee-Al-Aqsa-va-etre-detruite_a144380.html

     

    2015 The Critical Importance of Al Ghazali in Our Time - Hamza Yusuf

    I have been living all my life in a word of ruthless and inhuman self worshippers after the West had destroyed Islamic nations and civilisation!

    The Critical Importance of Al Ghazali in Our Time - Hamza Yusuf

    55,078 views
    •Published on 23 Mar 2015
     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    45.3K subscribers



    FonsVitae.com hosted Shaykh Hamza for a talk introducing the Fons Vitae Al-Ghazali Ihya Ulum Al-Din Series. Galt House, Louisville, Kentucky, November 3rd, 2011. 
    Produced by Ten Thousand Films tenthousandfilms.com.

    Jewels and Pearls of the Qur'an - Class 1 - Hamza Yusuf

    101,672 views
    •Published on 11 Oct 2013
     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    45.3K subscribers

    Jewels and Pearls of the Quran - Shaykh Hamza Yusuf - Class 1 from a Rihla, at times available through DeenIntensive.com and available in mass at DeenStream.com.
     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXMVao91b0w

    Shaykh Hamza Yusuf - Tafsir of Surah Yasin - Session 1

    220,178 views
    •Published on 22 Mar 2012
     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    15.5K subscribers
    From the Pearls of the Qur'an conference archives.
     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fsa_ss-3UGY

    Islam's Universal Values - Shaykh Hamza Yusuf

    99,690 views
    •Published on 9 Nov 2018
     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    45.3K subscribers

    Shaykh Hamza Yusuf at Muis Academy, Singapore, November 8 2018

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buT8oWI-S9U

    Prohibitions of the Tongue - Session 01 - Hamza Yusuf

    129,863 views
    •Published on 24 Nov 2013
     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    45.3K subscribers
    [ the full 15 episodes of this Rihla class in Turkey are available at DeenStream.com and https://sandala.org/products/prohibit... ] A famous hadith details several saving virtues and ends with the Prophet (pbuh) summarizing, "Shall I not tell you how to achieve all of this?" He took a hold of his tongue and said, "Restrain this." Restraint of the tongue has been considered by scholars to be a central prerequisite to character development. This course is based on the famous text "Maharim al-Lisaan" by Imam Muhammad al-Mawlud (d. 1323 H/1905 C.E.), and will provide students with a deeper understanding of moral and immoral speech, its effects, and ways to protect one's self from spiritual harm.
     
     

    MODERN GENGHIS KAGANOVICHES OF GREATER NASI ISRAEL,

    BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA HOLOCAUST ORCHESTRATED BY GREATER ISRAEL WITH SOVIET COMPLICITY



    During my short stay in the USSR, I saw firsthand Afghanis being indoctrinated in the COMMUNIST IDEOLOGY!   After the Communists took over Afghanustan in 1980, the cowardly USA under the Cowboy Butcher Ronald Regan armed and financed Afghan groups of primitives and fanatics they called Mujahidiin to fight the Soviets making sure the war lasted long enough (with inadequate weaponry) for their Master Plan of Reconquista.  They sent in other fanatics from the land they were occupying among the Arab-speaking nations.  Instead of fighting the NATO-Israel-CIA Occupied Arabia, they sent in Usama bin Ladin, his agent name TIM OSMAN, a Saudi or Arab fanatic and engineer to help the Afghanis and indoctrinate the Afghans into their barbaric anti-Islamic CIA religion of Salafism and Wahhabism prevalent in Saudia.  The pro-Israel Polish warmonger and Vatican Rothschild agent Zbigniew Brzezinski of pro-Stalin and anti-Hitler parents was to lead the way.

        
    When I landed against my will in the United Kingdom of Yakov (Satan) in 1991, I found myself in Real Earthly Hell.  But, as many say, like myself, Satan dwells in us, and God is only a figment of the imagination of the Wise men (not women!) of old who did not and could not find any better.  Today, the world rulers have found 6 million times worse!    

    Before the Bosnia-Herzegovina Ethnic Cleansing Campaign, I had read in a “tourist” (Satanic) brochure that Muslim Bosnia was eradicated by the Communists of its Islamic elements up to some 67%.  Judaic, Socialist and Communist imperialism, colonialism and hegemony had destroyed the Muslim nations of the Balkans, the USSR, Central Asia, Hindustan, Indonesia, Africa, Asia, Arabia, and almost everywhere in the world.

    After campaigning against the US and European wars against South-East Asia, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, and Indonesia, while I was a medical student in the Caucasus, Stavropol, 1965-1967, I was incomprehensibly thrown in jail for the night while I transited in London in January 1968, and deported to Paris although I had a B’rit’ish Passport and was registered as a “subject” or slave of their bogus majesty the illegitimate queen, so some say.I was also banned from returning to the USSR!

    I found myself under strict Judeo-Freemasonic rule in the UK, which destroyed my family, my life and that of my 'two' sons, although not completely and saw myself drowning in an ocean of mendacity, deceit, mass murder, and perversions of all sorts headed by the UK, the EU, Apartheid Israel, the USA, Australia, Canada, Socialism, Communism, and their subjected client states.

    But, I did not yet understand that the battle for survival, the pursuit of freedom, religion, and private property was lost in advance.  I heard the agonising cries from Bosnia, Algeria, and other parts of the cruelly oppressed world, but could do nothing to help except at the individual level.  But, I forgot the main thing:  I WAS BEING OPPRESSED TOO!  And instead of bothering about the others, I should have taken care of my own family, and I DID NOT because Satans (in disguise and not!) were living right under my own roof!       
     I was exiled in London in 1997 when I heard the cry of Bosnian Muslims: “Where are Mecca and Medina?”  I knew the answer since I was a teenager.  The Judaics and the decadent Christian (Satanic) Freemasons had occupied Arabia since the end of the ‘First’ Judeo-Freemasonic War – WWI. (The Second French, and IMF orchestrated Algerian Holocaust was well on its way!)

    What remained of the Muslims of Bosnia-Herzegovina, some 33% only, were being legally exterminated under orders of the United Kingdom of Satan under John Major and the Lobby, and the USA Corporation with the complicity of the Soviet leadership, most of it non religious Judaics and decadent Christians (ZIONISTS) because, after bleeding Afghanistan, the USA concocted a Plan with the Soviet Butcher and traitor Garbatchyov (Gorbatchev) to start their ZIONIST ISRAEL WORLD ORDER (NEW WORLD ORDER) under the condition that the URSS abandoned or freed all its satellites that would then be free to join NATO (NASI AMERICAN TERRORIST ORGANISATION) or not.  The NASI is a Judaic concept! 

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hht90k4JYxI

    The Koran and The Kalashnikov - Part 1 of 5


     BBC PROSTITUTE PROPAGANDA MEDIA


    Muslim blood is cheaper than fox blood as will one Kashmiri Nazir Ahmed of the House of "Lords" (Gods!) would later put it in “The Koran and the Kalashnikov”, a documentary that was meant to ignite BLACK ANGER against Muslims, and it did right in my locality in London that same night when it was broadcasted!  When the fighting Bosnia-Herzegovinians (Muslims and non Muslim alike, including Bosnian Serbs) called upon the Lord of the Worlds (Rabbu'l-'alamin) for help, ALLAH answered from His Throne (Arsh) Above and “the Answer (Jawaab) came”:

     Mecca and Medina “are far away, they are far away”!

    God (or ancient wisdom) saw Arabia under occupation, but Muslims worldwide refused to see that or they were unable to see having been exterminated by the millions, 100-150 million by that time, in only a few centuries! The survivors of that New Holocaust saw that the Ummah of Muhammad was dead or agonising, and while greeting the Messenger of God in Peace, Hamza, Ali, they saw the moribund Ummah fearlessly accepting their fate as martyrs!  The Bosnia-Herzegovina Holocaust was engineered by the West and NATO with Zionist Soviet and Zionist UN support, and the Bosnian “Badr of Islam” was lost!    

    (Gdje su Mekka i Medina by Aziz Alili, Song: Gdje su Mekka i Medina)


    When the Soviet Afghan Holocaust was over, Butcher William Jefferson Clinton bombed Afghanistan starting yet another BIGGER HOLOCAUST!  The COWARDS did not do so when the Soviets were there!  From Butcher Ronald Regan’s “HOLY JIHAD” and BRZEZINSKY “MUJAHIDIIN” who the US invited at the White House, the Afghans (AND ALL MUSLIM FREEDOM FIGHTERS WORLDWIDE!) became overnight TERRORISTS by that same White House!  But, Muslims must not complain as this is their entire fault!

    GENGHIS KHAN (c.1162 – 18 August1227), born Temüjin, the first Great Khanor Khagan.

    “O people, know that you have committed great sins, and that the great ones among you have committed these sins. If you ask me what proof I have for these words, I say it is becauseI am the punishment of God. If you had not committed great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

    • As quoted in Ta'Rikh-i-Jahan Gusha [History of the World Conqueror] by 'Ala-ad-Din 'Ata-Malik Juvaini (ca. 1252-1260), translated by J.A. Boyle (1958), p. 105

    Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich (Russian: Ла́зарь Моисе́евич Кагано́вич; 22 November [O.S. 10 November] 1893 – 25 July 1991) – Guess who he was and how many millions he helped murder in Christian Russia and the Muslim Central Asian Republics?  Some say 200 millions, including tens of millions of Muslims!  Who are all the modern GENGHIS KAGANS and for whom do they work?

    BAFS
    Tuesday 24 September 2019


    BNP PARIBAS ferme illégalement le compte en banque d’Égalité & Réconciliation !


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Soutenez-nous : BNP PARIBAS ferme illégalement le compte en banque d’Égalité & Réconciliation !


    Alerte donateurs :

    Les virements permanents mis en place sur notre compte en banque BNP Paribas, à présent fermé, sont désormais caducs (ceci ne concerne pas les dons par carte bancaire).
    Heureusement, grâce au travail acharné de nos équipes, des solutions par carte bancaire sont disponibles !
    Si vous étiez donateur par virement permanent, vous pouvez dès maintenant opter pour l’une d’elles :
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     Adhésions par CB : https://gestion-er.fr/adhesion/index.php
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     Financements participatifs par CB : https://gestion-er.fr/participatif/
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     Dons par CB : https://www.egaliteetreconciliation...
    Pour toute question, écrivez-nous à contact@e-r.fr.
    Vous pouvez aussi nous soutenir par la mise en place d’un nouveau virement permanent, sur un autre compte en banque (demandez à contact@e-r.fr l’IBAN nécessaire à sa mise en place).

    Après une mise en demeure en avril 2019, puis plusieurs courriers de confirmation cet été, BNP PARIBAS a clôturé arbitrairement et illégalement le compte en banque de l’association la semaine dernière.

    Suite à une première fermeture de compte sans justification de La Banque postale en décembre 2017, la Banque de France avait désigné BNP Paribas comme banque de l’association dans le cadre de la loi sur le droit au compte.
    La fermeture de notre compte en banque par la BNP est donc en totale contravention avec l’article L. 312-1 du code monétaire et financier.
    La procédure du droit au compte, garantie par la Banque de France, est le dernier recours bancaire pour ceux qui y font appel. En laissant BNP Paribas clôturer un droit au compte, la Banque de France refuse d’assurer le service minimum de protection bancaire assuré par la loi.
    Comme par le passé, avec La Banque postale, nous n’avons une fois de plus pas été informés des raisons à l’origine de cette clôture. Toutes nos tentatives pour avoir une explication ont échoué. Dans son courrier du 20 juin 2019, la direction des réclamations clients de BNP PARIBAS, certainement consciente du caractère politique de cette opération, s’essaye à la formule de courtoisie version politiquement correcte :
    « Ne voyez dans cette décision aucune attitude discriminatoire à votre encontre ni à celle de l’association. Je peux vous affirmer qu’eu égard à la diversité de ses équipes, présentes sur 5 continents et dans plus de 70 pays, de ses clients ainsi qu’à travers la richesse de ce brassage culturel, BNP Paribas se veut une banque civique, éthique, responsable et ouverte à tous. »
    À nouveau, le premier site politique français n’a plus de banque. Notre avocat Maître Viguier en tirera les conséquences.

    Depuis 2017, dans la foulée des GAFA, de plus en plus d’entreprises françaises se plient aux injonctions et délations des officines communautaires et des lobbies et mettent fin unilatéralement à leurs contrats avec l’association de loi 1901 Égalité & Réconciliation (voir cet article sur les « Sleeping Giants ») :
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     2017 : fermeture de notre compte à La Banque postale et de nos comptes Facebook
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     2017 : résiliation de notre assurance responsabilité civile par la MAIF
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     2018 : blocage de nos comptes Paypal et Stripe et suppression momentanée de la chaîne YouTube d’ERTV (rétablie... pour combien de temps ?)
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    -
     2019 : la toute récente fermeture de compte en banque par BNP Paribas
    Cette liste qui n’est pas exhaustive démontre le caractère totalement discriminatoire des attaques économiques menées contre Alain Soral, l’association E&R et son site d’information indépendant.

    Vous pouvez écrire à BNP Paribas et à la Banque de France pour exprimer votre mécontentement :
    BNP Paribas
    16, boulevard des Italiens
    75009 PARIS
    Banque de France
    31, rue Croix des Petits Champs
    75049 PARIS cedex 01

    Nous continuons évidemment le combat, merci pour votre soutien sans faille !

    Face aux persécutions du Système, votre participation est essentielle !


    Pour mesurer l’ampleur de l’acharnement contre E&R :

    E&R |Juin 2016 |302

    Liste non exhaustive des procès impliquant Alain Soral et Égalité & Réconciliation

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Dernière mise à jour : 1er décembre 2018
    Bref récapitulatif des principales procédures impliquant Alain Soral et Égalité & Réconciliation au 19 septembre 2019. Les dernières mises à jour et échéances importantes sont indiquées en rouge, ainsi que les montants et peines auxquels ont été condamnés Alain Soral ou E&R. Le total des condamnations pécuniaires s’élève à la somme (approximative, n’étant pas tenu compte des intérêts et (...)

    OY VEY! 5-10 MILLION MUSLIM NAZIS TO REPLACE 50 MILLION FRENCH WHITES AND CHRISTIANS!







     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0GzsNtTBJE

    OY VEY! 5-10 MILLION MUSLIM NAZIS TO REPLACE 50 MILLION FRENCH WHITES AND CHRISTIANS! 

    ÉRIC ZEMMOUR, THE MUSLIM HATER PAR EXCELLENCE! 
     
    I will obviously not object to Zemmour's opinions about Muslims or Islam, but I condemn his lying about Muslims and Islam on live television with nobody to contradict or stop him, thus stirring what is left of the Muslims and provoking the more vulnerable among them to reprehensible acts of whatever kind. If any citizen says that he or she did not find any evidence whatsoever to prove that Six Million Jews were incinerated in gas ovens under Adolf Hitler, the entire State apparatus and the Israel Lobby will pounce on them accusing them of the crime of "HOLOCAUST DENIAL"! Other terms like Shoah, Israel, gas chambers, or anything to do with cooking, roasting, barbecuing, or an anodyne anti-System gesture like the quenelle, started by humorist (stand-up comedian) Dieudonné M'Bala M'Bala, can be construed as a hate crime again Jews and Israel, and punishable by Law, and innocent citizens are persecuted, vilified, ostracised, hunted down, fined, jailed, and even assaulted in all legality.

    Who to blame? First, the Muslims themselves for disobeying their own Way to the Source or God called Shari'a! Then, the racists who have been using certain Arabic terms, not necessarily Islamic, to attack and subjugate Muslims in the West and in their homelands that they had once conquered and are still ruling by terror and using Freemasonic puppets at their heads and fake Muslims like Puppet dictator Ousni Mebarek, the Crypto-Jewish Sauds, King Farouk, King Idriss, King Husain, Reza Pahlavi, and many others. Anyone who oppose them or refuse to obey their diktat are either ousted, deposed or murdered, and the country bombed killing millions, namely rulers like Reza Pahlavi (ousted), Mossadeg (ousted), Muammar al Ghaddafi (murdered), Saddam Husain (murdered), Zia-ul-Haq (murdered), Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (hanged), and his daughter Benazir Bhutto (murdered), all Pakistanis who were close allies of the USA. They had tried with Gamel Abdel Nasser (one of their own agents), Ayatollah Khomeyni and Ahmedinejad and failed, but they still have plans and are campaigning nonstop for the bombing and destruction of Iran no matter who is the ruler.


    French-born Algerian Berber ("not Arab"?) Jew Éric Justin Léon Zemmour, is one of the most outspoken anti-Muslim racists and one of the biggest liars promoted by the media and protected by the State! He never stops attacking Muslims in the media, violently, viciously, assimilating all Muslims as IMMIGRANTS, and Islam as wanting to murder all Jews and Christians, which he falsely claims on live television that we can find in every single page of the Holy Qur'ân!

    Zemmour's parents had to flee Algeria because they had collaborated with the French to carry out the Second Holocaust of Muslims (1954 to 1962) where millions lost their lives, and many others were tortured and raped. As a Zionist serving Apartheid Israel, it does not surprise me that he has joined the biggest Zionist racist political party in France, the National Front. He labels all French Muslims as IMMIGRANTS, including me, as COLONISERS of France, and accuse Muslims of ISLAMIZING THE STREETS OF FRANCE!

    Zemmour quotes the writer Renaud Camus, who promoted the lie about a Muslim immigrant population (of a few million) that is replacing or will replace the White and Christian population of France of some 50 million!

    That damn liar and racist is allowed to speak openly and as long as he wants peddling the lie that in France like in Europe all the French peoples' problems (excluding the Muslims!) have been aggravated - not created - but aggravated by Muslim immigration: school, housing, unemployment, social deficit, public debt, prisons, professional qualifications, emergency in hospital, drugs, and that all the French problems (excluding Muslims) that have been aggravated have been aggravated by Islam!

    FROM:
    "Paris (AFP) - Récemment condamné pour des propos anti-musulmans, le polémiste Éric Zemmour est visé par une nouvelle enquête après sa violente charge contre l'immigration et l'islam, lors d'une réunion organisée par des proches de l'ex-députée d'extrême droite Marion Maréchal.

    Dans ce discours, prononcé samedi lors de la "Convention de la droite", il s'en était pris, entre autres, aux immigrés "colonisateurs" et à "l'islamisation de la rue". Il a aussi cité l'écrivain Renaud Camus, théoricien du "grand remplacement" de la population blanche et chrétienne par une population immigrée musulmane.

    "En France, comme dans toute l'Europe, tous nos problèmes sont aggravés -je ne dis pas créés- par l'immigration: école, logement, chômage, déficits sociaux, dette publiques, ordre public, prisons, qualifications professionnelles, urgences aux hôpitaux, drogue... Et tous nos problèmes aggravés par l'immigration sont aggravés par l'islam. C'est la double peine", avait également déclaré M. Zemmour."

    I love this unrepentant Zionist Racist ZEMMOUR as he is just the spokesman of the Zionist State, the Zionist Israel Lobby, and Apartheid Israel, and he has done an excellent job accusing the Muslims and Islam in such a detailed manner because this will show those dumb fanatics in what kind of racist, terrorist, and Zionist France they are living, and if they do not learn their lesson QUICKLY AND ACT ACCORDINGLY, they and their House "Negroes" will have only themselves to blame! They already have or had a NON MUSLIM Zionist Freemason as Rector of the Paris Central "Mosque" or Temple, and other Friends of Zionist Israel as leaders, including the UOIF, the "Muslim" Central Organisation of France (started under Charles Pasqua) set up in 1983 by the Zionist French government to control the Muslims of France, the Union of Islamic Organisations of France, a federation that was created right in my face, now of some 250 "Muslim" associations throughout France.  The Mafiosi Pasqua boasted that he would "Terrorize the Terrorists", meaning the Muslims, and we saw the State take full control of all Muslim associations all throughout France! 

    BAFS
    Wednesday 2nd of October 2019 

    NON MUSLIM FREEMASON DALIL BOUBAKEUR AT THE HEAD OF THE PARIS CENTRAL "MOSQUE" OR TEMPLE!  

    Un « habeas corpus » républicain pour l’islam de France

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Le recteur de la Mosquée de Paris s’insurge contre les intellectuels, les médias et les politiques qui nourrissent la peur et l’islamophobie.

    PAR LE DR DALIL BOUBAKEUR *

    Ne serait-il pas nécessaire de se pencher sur l’islam, avec les précautions, mais aussi les exigences de l’histoire ? C’est l’une des premières questions que soulève, dans sa leçon inaugurale, en 1956, Jacques Berque, titulaire de la chaire d’histoire sociale de l’islam contemporain au Collège de France entre 1956 et 1981.

    Aujourd’hui, et depuis des années, ces précautions d’usage auxquelles appelait Jacques Berque ne sont plus de mise. Des avis et des commentaires politiques ou intellectuels se bousculent aux portes des médias pour dire tout le mal qu’ils associent à l’islam et par voie de conséquence à tous les citoyens français de confession musulmane. Cela ne peut qu’alimenter cette haine de l’autre qui prospère grâce à un discours clairement islamophobe, prenant à partie la minorité de la population française de référence musulmane.

    Les musulmans de France sont victimes d’une stigmatisation permanente dans certains médias comme dans l’ensemble de l’échiquier politique

    L’extrême droite n’est pas la seule en cause  ! Depuis des années nous assistons à la banalisation d’une islamophobie décomplexée dans notre vie quotidienne et dans toutes les strates de la société. Depuis la première «  affaire du foulard  » en 1989 jusqu’au débat sur «  Islam et laïcité  » le 5 avril 2011 en passant par le débat sur l’identité nationale, la «  burqa  », le «  halal  », ou les «  prières de rue  », les musulmans de France sont victimes d’une stigmatisation permanente dans certains médias comme dans l’ensemble de l’échiquier politique, sous la plume de certains intellectuels ou politiciens. «  L’islam est un problème pour la France  », a déclaré récemment un ex-Premier ministre.

    Trop c’est trop  ! Oubliant les principes de laïcité, de neutralité et liberté de conscience, loin de connaître l’islam dans son fond et dans sa pratique, ces «  bien-pensants  » alimentent régulièrement l’idée que l’islam est une religion guerrière et violente. Tout un courant d’opinion se fait jour qui encourage une certaine islamophobie dangereuse qui gangrène bien des esprits de nos quartiers et de nos villes et villages.

    Des fanatiques musulmans ont fomenté et fomentent des attentats terroristes absolument intolérables provoquant ici ou là des massacres honteux que tous les religieux de l’islam, dont ceux de la Mosquée de Paris, ont fermement condamnés. Ils n’ont jamais manqué de dénoncer ces actes de barbarie tout en s’élevant contre tout ce qui, aujourd’hui, déforme, pervertit et dévoie l’enseignement du Coran. Ils s’insurgent qu’on puisse penser que la foi musulmane assujettisse les femmes et prêche la guerre sainte contre tous les non-musulmans.

    Contrairement à une opinion qui se propage face aux crispations religieuses qui s’observent partout dans le monde, l’intégrisme, les violences et les massacres ne sont pas l’apanage du seul islam. Les intégrismes fleurissent dans chaque grande religion du monde. Cette vague mondiale de fanatisme touche toutes les religions, et pas que les religions…

    Mais nous refusons que certains intellectuels, journalistes ou hommes politiques, forts de leur position dominante et dans un esprit d’amalgames sidérants, alimentent dans notre pays l’impression générale de beaucoup de Français qui cèdent à la peur d’un islam décrit comme intrinsèquement fanatique : musulman = terroriste, islam = islamisme, foi = fanatisme. Il est vrai que ceux qui alimentent régulièrement cette peur dans leurs tribunes soignent leurs écrits pour éviter de tomber sous le coup de la loi.

    Ces débats nauséeux visent à établir et à entretenir une confusion dangereuse entre islam, insécurité, immigration, islamisme et terrorisme, tandis ne cesse de grandir dans certains milieux politiques la tentation de s’attaquer à la loi de 1905 sur la laïcité pour hiérarchiser les religions et s’ingérer dans le fonctionnement de l’une d’entre elles : l’islam ! Comme au temps des colonies.

    Il nous faut ici rester lucides et tirer les justes conclusions des leçons de l’histoire déjà ancienne de la France avec l’islam, une histoire dont la Mosquée de Paris depuis le début du XXe siècle est le symbole et la sève. Plutôt que d’alimenter une peur irraisonnée antimusulmane dans l’opinion de notre pays, n’est-il pas temps et autrement plus constructif d’ajouter nos voix et notre soutien aux musulmans de France condamnés avant même d’être jugés  ?

    Nous, citoyens français de confession musulmane, demandons à nos censeurs et juges patentés la présomption d’innocence républicaine avant que d’être condamnés et voués aux gémonies

    Nous refusons d’être régulièrement pointés du doigt comme des boucs émissaires pour éviter de parler des vrais problèmes et des angoisses des Français que sont le chômage, le pouvoir d’achat ou l’écart croissant des inégalités sociales et économiques  ! Nous demandons un «  habeas corpus  » pour l’islam et les musulmans de France : un citoyen libre ne doit pas être soumis régulièrement à une doxa arbitraire ou vexatoire qui l’enferme, voire le ghettoïse en raison de son appartenance réelle ou supposée à une religion. Et avec comme seule solution, « réorganiser l’islam, voire le changer » !

    Nous, citoyens français de confession musulmane, demandons à nos censeurs et juges patentés la présomption d’innocence républicaine avant que d’être condamnés et voués aux gémonies. Car en ces temps de brouillage idéologique et de recomposition politique, nous nous devons de faire preuve de la plus grande clarté et d’une plus grande lucidité républicaine. La démocratie sera toujours du côté de celles et ceux qui exigent l’égalité, la justice sociale et le respect des libertés civiles, au côté de tous nos concitoyens stigmatisés au nom de leur appartenance religieuse réelle ou supposée, ou de leur couleur.

    La vie apaisée et harmonieusement intégrée des musulmans de France dans une même communauté de destin et de valeurs dépend de nous tous. Ne manquons pas ce rendez-vous de l’Histoire !

    * Recteur de la Grande Mosquée de Paris

    Source : Le Point

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NINB4WipEUw&t=2851s

    Émission spéciale "affaire Epstein" avec Alain Soral et Pierre Jovanovic

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    31.5K subscribers

    Émission officielle de la revue Faits & Documents , lettre bimensuelle de 12 pages fondée par Emmanuel Ratier, qui traite essentiellement de l’actualité politique, économique et culturelle, française et internationale. À l’occasion de cette cinquième émission consacrée à l’affaire Epstein, Xavier Poussard (rédacteur en chef de Faits & Documents) et Vincent de la librairie Facta ont reçu Alain Soral et Pierre Jovanovic. Un épisode diffusé en exclusivité sur ERFM le 19 septembre 2019.  

    Pour commenter : http://egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Emi...

     

    Éric Zemmour visé par une enquête après ses propos sur l'islam et l'immigration

    Mehdi CHERIFIA





    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Le polémiste Éric Zemmour à la "Convention de la droite"à Paris le 28 septembre 2019





    Paris (AFP) - Récemment condamné pour des propos anti-musulmans, le polémiste Éric Zemmour est visé par une nouvelle enquête après sa violente charge contre l'immigration et l'islam, lors d'une réunion organisée par des proches de l'ex-députée d'extrême droite Marion Maréchal.
    Dans ce discours, prononcé samedi lors de la "Convention de la droite", il s'en était pris, entre autres, aux immigrés "colonisateurs" et à "l'islamisation de la rue". Il a aussi cité l'écrivain Renaud Camus, théoricien du "grand remplacement" de la population blanche et chrétienne par une population immigrée musulmane.

    "En France, comme dans toute l'Europe, tous nos problèmes sont aggravés -je ne dis pas créés- par l'immigration: école, logement, chômage, déficits sociaux, dette publiques, ordre public, prisons, qualifications professionnelles, urgences aux hôpitaux, drogue... Et tous nos problèmes aggravés par l'immigration sont aggravés par l'islam. C'est la double peine", avait également déclaré M. Zemmour.

    Le parquet de Paris a annoncé mardi l'ouverture de cette enquête pour "injures publiques en raison de l'origine ou de l'appartenance ou de la non appartenance à une ethnie, une nation, une race ou une religion déterminée" et "provocation publique à la discrimination, la haine ou la violence, à l'égard d'une personne ou d'un groupe de personnes à raison de leur origine ou de leur appartenance ou non appartenance à une ethnie, une nation, une race ou une religion déterminée".

    "Je serais curieux de savoir si le parquet a pris connaissance de l'intégralité du discours d'Éric Zemmour car il est de jurisprudence constante que la critique, même dure, d'une religion n'est pas répréhensible. Il n'y a pas de délit de blasphème en France", a réagi auprès de l'AFP Me Olivier Pardo, l'avocat du polémiste. Interrogé sur les propos concernant l'immigration, l'avocat n'a en revanche pas souhaité réagir.

    Ces déclarations ont suscité un tollé, jusqu'au sein du gouvernement. Le Premier ministre en personne, Édouard Philippe, a condamné des discours "nauséabonds et profondément contraires à l'idée que nous nous faisons de la France et de la République".
    - "Erreur d'appréciation" -

    L'Observatoire national contre l'islamophobie, une instance qui dépend du Conseil français du culte musulman, a dénoncé mardi un discours "inacceptable" qui "cache une volonté manifeste de fracturer la société".

    Mardi soir, la chaîne Paris Première, l'un des employeurs du polémiste, a annoncé dans un communiqué l'avoir "convoqué" afin de "revenir sur les propos particulièrement choquants et provocateurs tenus dans le discours introductif de la Convention de la droite". La direction de la chaîne dit lui avoir "rappelé fermement les conditions de sa participation à l’émission "Zemmour et Naulleau" avant la reprise de la nouvelle saison", mercredi soir.

    Mi-septembre, Éric Zemmour avait été définitivement condamné, après le rejet de son pourvoi en cassation, à 3.000 euros d'amende pour provocation à la haine religieuse après des propos anti-musulmans tenus en 2016.

    Lors de l'émission "C à vous" diffusée le 6 septembre 2016 sur France 5, il avait affirmé que la France vivait "depuis trente ans une invasion" et que, "dans d'innombrables banlieues françaises où de nombreuses jeunes filles sont voilées", se jouait une "lutte pour islamiser un territoire", "un jihad".

    La diffusion en direct du discours d'Éric Zemmour samedi par LCI a par ailleurs donné lieu à "près de 400" saisines du Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel (CSA), a indiqué lundi ce dernier.

    La chaîne du groupe TF1 a reconnu une "erreur d'appréciation". "La diffusion du discours dans l'état n'était pas le format approprié pour notre chaîne", a indiqué dimanche sa direction dans un communiqué. "Il y a bien eu contradiction et déconstruction des propos d'Éric Zemmour, mais c'était après-coup".

    MY RELIGION, Human Primordial Fitraic, Vedic, Jewic, Christic Universal Muslim ISLAM!

    •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBLTngmUgWQ
      МОЯ РЕЛИГИЯ, Первобытный Фитраик, Вед,
       Еврей, Христос, Вселенский Мусульманин
      ИСЛАМ!

    • MA RELIGION, l’ISLAM Universel, humaine 

      primordiale fitraïque, Védique, Juifique,

      Christique.


      Karl Jenkins: The Armed Man - full concert

      Image may be NSFW.
      Clik here to view.

      878 subscribers

      Oscar Fredrik's Vocalis, Kammarkör and Sinfonietta performs The Armed Man by Karl Jenkins. Recorded live March 16, 2012 in Oscar Fredrik's church (Oscar Fredriks kyrka) - Göteborg, Sweden. Participants: Oscar Fredriks Vocalis & Kammarkör Oscar Fredriks Sinfonietta Fouad Colic - imam Mia Wallander - soprano Julia Attrel - alt Johan de Sousa Mestre - tenor Henrik Forsman - bass Lars Hernqvist - conductor 0:00 The Armed Man (L'Homme Armé) 6:48 Call to Prayers (Adhaan) 9:34 Kyrie 18:12 Save Me from Bloody Men 20:10 Sanctus 27:13 Hymn Before Action 29:55 Charge! 37:40 Angry Flames 41:50 Torches 44:27 Agnus Dei 48:30 Now the Guns have Stopped 51:27 Benedictus 58:38 Better is Peace If you enjoyed this concert, you may also like: Karl Jenkins - The Healer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wlyO...Karl Jenkins - Stabat Mater https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ich_t...

       WIKIPEDIA

      Franz Joseph Haydn[a] (/ˈhdən/; German: [ˈfʁants ˈjoːzɛf ˈhaɪdn̩](Image may be NSFW.
      Clik here to view.
      About this sound
      listen
      )
      ; 31 March[b] 1732 – 31 May 1809) was an Austrian composer of the Classical period. He was instrumental in the development of chamber music such as the piano trio.[2] His contributions to musical form have earned him the epithets "Father of the Symphony" and "Father of the String Quartet".[3]
      Haydn spent much of his career as a court musician for the wealthy Esterházy family at their remote estate. Until the later part of his life, this isolated him from other composers and trends in music so that he was, as he put it, "forced to become original".[c] Yet his music circulated widely, and for much of his career he was the most celebrated composer in Europe.
      He was a friend and mentor ofMozart, a tutor ofBeethoven, and the older brother of composer Michael Haydn.

      AUSTRIA was the homeland of the MAN OF PEACE HERR ADOLF HITLER who was dragged into war by JUDEA, Britain and France. 1933-1945. I was born in 1945 in a French-British Slave Colony. BAFS

       Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus

      32 mins
      MY RELIGION, Human Primordial Fitraic, Vedic, Jewic, Christic Universal Muslim ISLAM! 😍😍😍
      Hassen Rasool - The Royal Call to Prayer From London, England - Karl Jenkins - The Armed Man
      2,077,231 views
      •20 Jul 2018
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRSTNWRo5CY&t=440s...
      See More
      Once again The Call to Prayer was performed by Hassen Rasool who was delighted to be asked to perform the Adhan at The ancient church of St Pancras, on Euston Road, London, United Kingdom on the 4th July 2018.
      The Armed Man by Karl Jenkins with Haydn’s Mass in Time of War was performed to mark the 100th anniversary of the start of World War One.

      Presented by : UBS CHORAL SOCIETY & ORCHESTRA, BANK OF AMERICA, MERRILL LYNCH CHOIR & SINFONIETTA, AON CHOIR, ROYAL ACADEMY CHOIR, FAIRLAWN SINGERS.

      The Adhan (The Call to Prayer) was performed in the middle of the musical composition, providing a brilliantly contrasted evening of music and spirituality which was both exhilarating and inspiring. See the end of the video to hear some raw emotion from some members of the audience.
      "The movement which is the existence of the universe is the movement of love."

      Please subscribe to the channel to be kept informed of new performances and content.
      http://hassenrasool.com/book-hassen/
    • Image may be NSFW.
      Clik here to view.
      BEAUTIFUL AZAAN IN A CHURCH USA (LATEST)
      youtube.com
      BEAUTIFUL AZAAN IN A CHURCH USA (LATEST)
      BEAUTIFUL AZAAN IN A CHURCH USA (LATEST)
    • Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusI was born in Islam, and my Father IDRIS (IDRICE) (born 10 December 1910) whose father ALI MUHAMMAD nourished his Islam, nourished mine as well although he deviated on the way, but he never lost it completely. His own progeny helped him and our illiterate, but greatly charitable Mother RABIAH, to destroy our Islamic Way of life, ten of them and more who joined Satan instead of clinging to the Rope of ALLAH!! Sata is laughing at me and us because he won the Jihaad between him and GOD by destroying Christendom and the Unity of the Muslim Ummah of MUHAMMAD, peace and blessings be upon him, his loyal and faithful family, Companions of old and all those, including the martyrs, who walked in Unity along the path to the Source. Amiin. 😍😇😍                             


    • The Armed Man, Karl Jenkins - Concert pour la Liberté, juin 2014

      58,197 views
      •25 Jan 2016
      86 subscribers

      Cérémonies du 70ème anniversaire de la Bataille de Normandie - Concert pour la Liberté au Mémorial de Caen The Armed Man - A mass for peace (Karl Jenkins) Schola de l'Orne Choeurs des élèves des classes CHAM et Maîtrise du Conservatoire à Rayonnement Départemental d'Alençon Choeurs des élèves des classes CHAM, classe de chant et choeur 2ème cycle du Conservatoire à Rayonnement Départemental de Lisieux Choeurs des élèves des classes CHAM et Maîtrise de l'Institut Saint-Lo d'Agneaux Collegium Cantorum de Coutances 
      Chant (Appel à la prière): Mohammed BENCHEIKH [6:30]
      Les Musiciens du Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra Les Musiciens de l'Orchestre Régional de Basse-Normandie Chef d'Orchestre: Jean DEROYER Mise en espace: Stéphane GRIMALDI et Guillaume LAMAS Conception vidéo: Didier LELIÈVRE
       
       

       Chant (Appel à la prière): Mohammed BENCHEIKH [6:30]

    RÉCONCILIATION NATIONALE - J'AIME LA FRANCE SOUVERAINE, ET JE SUIS MUSULMAN!



    J'AIME LA FRANCE SOUVERAINE,  
    ET JE SUIS MUSULMAN!



     DIEU EST SOUVERAIN EN ISLAM,

    ET AIME TOUTE SA CRÉATION!
      JE SUIS POUR LA
    RÉCONCILIATION NATIONALE,

    MÊME SI LA FRANCE ME HAIT!




    Conférence d’Alain Soral et Youssef Hindi à Nice

    180,769 views
    •7 May 2017
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    147K subscribers
     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OHVec4WY20



    Le 22 avril 2017, à l’occasion de la seconde étape du Tour anniversaire E&R, à Nice, Alain Soral et Youssef Hindi ont donné une conférence sur le thème : 
    « Du déclin de la République à la nécessaire réconciliation nationale ». 
    Au sommaire : 
     00:00 - Images de l’événement  
    03:20 - Introduction d’Alain Soral  
    10:24 - Youssef Hindi  
    11:37 - La Révolution française  
    14:19 - La religion républicaine  
    19:50 - La laïcité 
    21:33 - La structuration du système politique français  
    25:21 - Le rôle du Front national  
    30:00 - Évolution de la République française 
    32:07 - Le scandale du canal du Panama et les vagues d’antisémitisme  
    39:40 - L’effondrement de la Troisième République  
    43:35 - La situation actuelle  
    49:20 - Alain Soral  
    50:50 - Monde spirituel contre monde matériel  
    56:16 - Le Front national  
    1:03:25 - L’immigration  
    1:10:30 - Le travail d’E&R  
    1:18:20 - Mélenchon  
    1:21:10 - Le nazisme économique  
    1:25:00 - Donald Trump et les limites de la démocratie  
    1:27:19 - La Corée du Nord 
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fjIIA55IiU&t=4535s

    Religion & Histoire – Conférence de Youssef Hindi aux alentours de Genève

    69,509 views
    16 Apr 2017
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.


     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcwzfcGfy14

    Tour anniversaire de 10 ans

    E&R : Lyon – Alain Soral répond aux questions du public

    248,701 views
    11 Sep 2017
      Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    147K subscribers



    Le 4 juin 2017, l’équipe d’E&R Rhône-Alpes a accueilli à Lyon la quatrième étape du Tour anniversaire E&R. 
    Pour commenter cette vidéo : https://www.egaliteetreconciliation.f... 

    Le Tour anniversaire E&R : Lille – L’intervention d'Alain Soral

    157,361 views
    20 Nov 2017
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    147K subscribers
     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edcQq5qbb3o
     Sketch Faurisson & Dieudonné
    158,266 views
    •22 Oct 2018



    Le 21 mai 2017, l’équipe d’E&R Nord-Pas-de-Calais a accueilli à Lille la troisième étape du Tour anniversaire E&R. 
    Les intervenants de cette journée étaient Lucien Cerise, Xavier de Faits & Documents, Pierre Hillard et Alain Soral. 
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE_uwv-gP2A&t=4s
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    370K subscribers



    Robert Faurisson & Dieudonné, "The Faurisson Case", 
    Interview de Maître Simon Krokfield, bonus du DVD 
    J'ai fait l'con de Dieudonné : https://bit.ly/2CZUycx


    J'EMMERDE LA FRANCE SIONISTE

    ET ISRAËL DE L'APARTHEID!

     

    VIVE LA FRANCE LIBRE 
    ET SOUVERAINE!



    LA FRANCE MODERNE EST UNE RÉPUBLIQUE DE MERDE

    Aleksandr Dugin


    LA FRANCE MODERNE
    EST UNE RÉPUBLIQUE DE MERDE, ET UNE DÉMOCRATIE DE MERDE, FONDÉES SUR LA JUDÉO-MAÇONNERIE ET LES JUDÉO-CHRISTIANISMES SIONISTES!
    BAFS - 8 octobre 2019




    147K subscribers
    Au sommaire : 00:27 : Les motos et la sociologie du motard 09:19 : Les baby-boomers 14:43 : Le site internet Démocratie Participative 16:57 : Les violences conjugales 22:55 : Yann Moix 27:53 : Jean-Marie Corda 31:15 : Copy-Comic 36:21 : Théodore Hertzl - François Bégaudeau - Autocritique 46:56 : Cédric Villani 51:41 : Robespierre 59:00 : Léon Blum 01h03:31 : Les commentaires sur Internet Pour commenter : http://egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Sor... Pour soutenir ERTV : http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr...
     

    Soral répond... sur ERFM ! – Quinzième fournée !




                Les Anciens de toutes les Nations avaient presque tout compris, moralement, philosophiquement, spirituellement, mystiquement, y compris logiquement, mais, aujourd'hui, ce temps est bien révolu, et, seul la force brute et animale, voire satanique, fait force de loi et de critère entre le bien et le mal.  La moralité ancestrale est fondée sur la croyance en des vertus d'ordre divin alors que l'éthique est une remarquable tromperie, une escroquerie de l'État matérialiste qui contrôle tout, y compris les croyances en Dieu et la pratique des religions.
                L'Histoire qu'on oblige nos enfants à apprendre, et aux adultes d'accepter, sinon ils sont taxés de tous les crimes imaginables et inimaginables, et punis sévèrement, ne consistent que de batailles, de massacres, de vendettas, de la folie destructrice de l'homme émasculés, que nous voyons incarner de plus en plus par des femmes pratiquement déféminisées, car avec d'autres pervers et dégénérés, elles ne savent plus où elles en sont avec leur sexualité, et même de leur rôle naturelle et reproductive de l'espèce humaine.
                Ayant volontairement choisi les matières scientifiques, BAFS est mieux à même de comprendre les origines de cette force diabolique qui nous gouverne et fabrique l'opinion publique quasi scientifiquement sous un régime de terreur.  N'étant spécialisé dans aucune matière académique, il a quand même acquis une certaine expertise en matière de détection du vrai et du faux, sauf dans certains cas, car il s'est fait avoir lui-même plusieurs fois par des escrocs à qui il avait fait confiance, y compris son épouse française.  Et, ce n'est qu'en pactisant avec le Diable, qu'il a fini par comprendre davantage la réalité de ce monde de fous, de matérialistes, de vampires, de parasites, et d'égoïstes, et ainsi de mieux comprendre Dieu en général.
             Mais, en dépit de cela, BAFS a rarement trouvé un ami vrai et durable, sauf en Dieu.  Quand il vit les impôts des citoyens payer des menteurs, des propagandistes et des racistes suprématistes pour nous attaquer sans arrêt à la télévision et au cinéma depuis près d'un demi-siècle, sans qu'on ait le droit de nous défendre, et surtout les Musulmans, il comprit que tout était perdu, mais cela n'empêche pas certains de continuer le combat pour la vérité, mais sans aucune action positive, tout ne demeure que des mots!
             J'aurais pu prendre l'exemple de l'Arabe MUHAMMAD, le plus grand imposteur et le plus grand terroriste de l'histoire occidentale des 14 derniers siècles, que d'ailleurs de nombreux occidentaux eux-mêmes, parmi les plus célèbres, ont exonéré de tous les crimes dont on n'a jamais cessé de l'accuser à tort, mais prenons plutôt celui du plus grand criminel de l'histoire occidentale moderne, l'Allemand et l'Autrichien ADOLF HITLER, qui cependant on n'accuse pas d'avoir massacré un DEMI MILLIARDd'êtres humains de la main et de l'esprit destructeurs des armées de l'occident impérialiste et coloniale de ces derniers siècles, mais d'avoir commis le plus grand crime contre l'humanité de toute l'histoire de l'être humain écrite par l'occident, celui d'avoir fait incinérer SIX MILLIONS de Juifs dans des fours crématoires, mais sans jamais en fournir la preuve, pas une seule, soit des fours soit des morts!
                Mais, le dogme anti-Hitler comme le dogme anti-Muhammad persistent et font des ravages partout dans le monde qui refuse l'Ordre Mondial Judéo-Franc-maçonnique et Sioniste que contrôle les banquiers usuriers du plus Grand Temple des finances et de la prostitution de l'Histoire sous contrôle des Rothschilds, principalement, et du Vatican qu'ils contrôlent aussi!    
             Nous vivons dans une prison où la VÉRITÉ n'a pratiquement aucune valeur sauf chez quelques individus et familles, et n'a même pas le droit de citer dans les médias si elle concerne le Lobby que n'avons pas le droit de citer sous peine de poursuites judiciaires, de perte d'emploi. d'ostracisme, de violences verbales et physiques, de condamnations, d'emprisonnement, et de mort même.  Le monde est servile! Le monde a peur! Le monde est terrorisé! Les nations rebelles sont  sous les bombes sans arrêt!  Et, les éternels coupables sont toujours Muhammad (les Musulmans et l'Islam!) et Hitler (les "Nazis")!
            Jordan Peterson est le plus célèbre et le plus remarquable des "clinical psychologists" de l'occident.  Il est même unique, mais l'Islam n'a nul besoin de psychologues pour dépister les origines de ce cancer!  Le Livre Saint de l'Islam définit ce qui est Bien et ce qui est Mal alors que l'occident est fondé sur le Mal uniquement, suite à la destruction de la civilisation chrétienne fondée sur la vertu, le partage, et l'amour du prochain, et suite à la perversion des églises que jadis un certain Jésus aurait appelées la Synagogue de Satan!  Il n'y a pratiquement rien de vertueux dans les relations des couples modernes qui se terminent le plus souvent en drame, divorce, et souffrances qui endommagent nos enfants, qui sont irrécupérables pour un grand nombre d'entres eux.
            Alors que l''Islam parle de la Nature Primordiale chez tous les humains qu'est le FITRA, l'occident a du attendre plus d'un millénaire pour inventer l'EXISTENTIALISME, l'ÊTRE car il n'acceptera jamais un concept arabe qu'il continue, en général, à considérer comme barbare et inférieur alors que le Christianisme est bien né dans ce milieu quoique hellénisé et universalisé plus tard, mais que pour la "race" blanche de l'occident.  L'Occident est incapable de comprendre le CONSCIENT car il ne peut être prouvé par leurs sciences et pseudosciences, et, pour cela, il se tourne souvent vers la philosophie védantique ou bouddhique!
             L'occident nous rappelle que le Bouddhisme enseigne que la vie c'est souffrir, mais l'Islam fait de même quand il dit que la vie sur terre est une épreuve!  Le christianisme parle de tribulations, et le crucifix représente le symbole de la souffrance! Alors que la vertu exige que nous partagions avec les plus démunis, Satan (le Nouvel Ordre Mondial) fait tout pour créer les démunis, les sacrifier, les exterminer, tout au profit de l'Élite qui nous gouverne alors que le Marxisme leur est parvenu justement pour empêcher cela, mais que Marx attribuait à la religion chrétienne, l'opium du peuple.  Tout comme le christianisme s'est servit du Christ pour dominer le monde, le socialisme, le communisme et la démocratie se sont servis du Marxisme pour faire de même.
            Seul le Christisme et l'Islam peuvent y remédier à cet état satanique des choses, mais allez faire comprendre cela aux Croyants des deux religions, qui en fait ne furent à l'origine qu'une seule et même religion!  Quand nous voyons le Pr. Roger Garaudy, le Pr. Robert Faurisson, Vincent Reynouard, Brendon Lee O'Connell, Alain Soral, Dieudonné M'bala M'bala, le Sheikh Imran Hossein, Aleksandr Dugin et de milliers d'autres opposer le Nouvel Ordre Mondial des tyrans de ce monde, ils sont tous qualifiés d'Hitler par les mêmes Lobbies et Israël de l'Apartheid!

    BAFS
    Ce 8 octobre 2019


    GENOCIDAL WARMONGERING USA AND APARTHEID ISRAEL PLAYING CHESS AGAIN OCTOBER 2019!

    THE NEW KAGANOVICHES! 
    GOD'S MASTER PLAN!

    CHRIST AND ISLAM UNITE OR BURN IN HELL ON EARTH!


    I AM REALLY FED UP WITH CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM MENDACITY,
    HYPOCRISY, COWARDICE AND MAMON WORSHIP!
     


    .
    "All The News That Sulzberger's  Propaganda Rag  SawFit To Distort"
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    A Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,
    Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines
    ___________________________________________________________________
    OCTOBER 2019  1 FED RESERVE NOTE
    ___________________________________________________________________

    "We read and rebut their vile crap so you won't have to!"
    *****************************************
    ALL ARTICLES FOR ANY GIVEN MONTH APPEAR ON SAME PAGE -- MOST RECENT FIRST --  SCROLL DOWN FOR PAST DATES.

    WEDNESDAY / OCTOBER 9, 2019

     

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for trump syria
     Time Magazine:Israelis Watch U.S. Abandon Kurds, and Worry: Who’s Next?



    TUESDAY / OCTOBER 8, 2019

     

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for colin powell new york times on trump
     Time Magazine:Colin Powell: The Republican Party Needs To 'Get a Grip' and Stand Up to Trump

    REBUTTAL BY
    Well, well, well --- look at what the Deep State has dragged out of mothballs to dump on Trump. It's none other than the Magic Mulatto -- the military "genius" who brought the world the genocidal "Highway of Death" in Gulf War I, and then, as Secretary of State a dozen years later, followed up on that montrous infamy by giving a crucial assist to the Bush-Cheney Mafia in bringing about the disastrous Iraq War II. Boys and girls, the oh-so-estimable creation of the CFR(Council on Foreign Relations) -- put your hands together for Colon Rectum Bowell!(cue the trumpets of Mount Olympus)
    Glib as always while speaking smoothly at a forum with contemptible Pakistani Globalist, Fareed Zakaria(CFR) and the equally odious Madeline the Murderess Albright(CFR), Colon Bowell had this to say:
    “They (the Republican Party) need to get a grip, and when they see things that aren’t right they need to say something about it. Because our foreign policy is a shambles right now, in my humble judgement. And I see things happening that are hard to understand.”
    Plugging the above comment into our computerized Globalese-to-English translation engine yielded the following result:
    Translation: The Globalist wing of the Republican Party has got to find a way to stop Trump. Peace and stability are breaking out all over the world and that's very bad for our Globalist designs."

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for highway of death colin powell
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for highway of death
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for colin powell new york times
    1 & 2. 1991: The Affirmative Action general eagerly and senselessly slaughtered thousands of Iraqi troops and civilians as they desperately fled from the mighty US air-power on "The Highway of Death." // 2003: As Secretary of State under Bush II, Bowell's undeserved stature, protective pigmentation, and silky smooth rap enabled him to get away with selling a ridiculously dishonest "Dog & Pony" uranium show at the UN --- a stunt which gave the War Party the protective cover needed to finally launch the disastrous war.

     * As an Army Major during the Vietnam War in 1968, Bowell also helped to cover up the infamous My Lai Massacer. (here)

    Let us review the "shambles" of Trump's foreign policy as compared to what he inherited in 2017 following the 28-year reign of ruin of Bush I, Clinton, Bush II & Obongo -- a span of terrors which included perpetual wars and proxy wars -- and culminated with George Soros himself cryptically threatening Russia and China with World War 3. (here)

    WW 3 HOTSPOT
    2017 / BEFORE TRUMP
    2019 / STATUS NOW
    Syria / ISIS
    Assad in danger / Threat of confrontation between US & Russia
    War is over, ISIS crushed, US troops coming home
    Korean Peninsula
    Threat of new Korean War always present and dangerous.
    Trump & Lil' Kim getting along. North & South Korea in friendly talks. Trump actually set foot on North Korean soil.
    East Ukraine - Russia
    CIA-Ukraine killing Russian-speaking East Ukrainians -- baiting Putin to invade and trigger war with NATO
    Russia and Ukraine talking. Trump establishing good relations with both.
    "The Asian Pivot"(against China)
    US organizing and/or arming Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Australia, Philippines & Vietnam in an allied aggressive posture against China
    Relations between China and Pacific nations vastly improved. Trump & Xi get along very well.
     
    How about them "shambles," eh Colon? Even Africa seems to have calmed down -- not surprising given that terror groups like "Boko Haram" were CIA fronts. And now the 'Greater Israel" Zionists and their Israel Firster operatives in America are openly whining about Trump's decision to withdraw from Syria completely. From the Jerusalem Post:
     
    Headline (October 7, 2019): Can Israel Trust the U.S. After Syria Withdrawal?
     
    "The US surprise decision to announce that it would withdraw from an area along the Syrian border and enable a Turkish military operation into northern Syria raises many questions about long-term US policy in the Middle East. It is also concerning to Jerusalem because both Iran, an enemy of Israel, and Turkey, which excoriates Israel regularly at international forums, appear to gain as the US retreat."

     
    The observable geo-political situation is very clear. In a world which, less than three years ago, had been on a collision course toward World War 3 -- four potentially catastrophic trip-wires have been skillfully deactivated. Peace is at hand, and Council on Foreign Relations scum like Colon Bowel don't like it one bit.
     
    Remember the bad old days?
     
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for mccain in ukraine
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    http://s.marketwatch.com/public/resources/MWimages/MW-CQ890_soros__ZG_20140818112004.jpg

    1. 2013: Secretary of State Killary: "Russia and China will pay a price for standing up for the Assad regime." //  2. 2013: McCain the Insane unleashed chaos in Ukraine. // 3. Soros: 2016: “If there is conflict between China and a military ally of the United States, like Japan, then it is not an exaggeration to say that we are on the threshold of a third world war..... there is a real danger that China will align itself with Russia politically and militarily, and then the threat of third world war becomes real.”
     
     
     *
     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for mccain in ISIS
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image
     
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for NORTH VS SOUTH KOREA
    1. McCain with ISIS in Syria // 2. Obongo's "Asian Pivot" was a provocation of China. // 3. North Korea vs South-Korea: A 60 year flash-point -- now calmer than ever.
     
     
    Bowell's empty words serve as a stark warning as to what will happen when Trump leaves office, probably in 2025 -- barring some major Q-Anon-related political shake-up / swamp-draining / voting bloc realignments which would block the Globalists from retaking the White House post-Trump, that is. A cleaning-up and restructuring of the "shambles" which Trump is making of the world would mean a return to perpetual war and revolution in the Middle East; renewed animosity between NATO and Russia in Europe, and a return to mischief by the CIA and its vassals in the Asian Pacific and Korean Peninsula. 
     
    If the awarding of the coveted Nobel Peace Prize were a legitimate honor instead of a Globalist propaganda spectacle -- Trump and Putin would be named co-winners this coming Friday. As it stands, the scuttlebutt among Marxists and libtards "in the know" is that this year's medallion (along with a $1.1 million cash award) will be going to the angry little Communist actress from Sweden -- Greta "How Dare You" Thunberg of the children's "Global Climate Strike" fame. ---- Sick world.


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for trump and putin soccer ball
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for trump and xi
    .
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for trump and kim

     Candidate Trump in 2016: "Wouldn't it be nice, if we got along with Russia, and China -- and all these countries? Wouldn't it be nice?"

     ***ADDENDUM***
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for colin powell and hillary clinton
    Colon and Killary -- as thick as theives!
    Are you hiding something too, Mr. Bowell? Is that why you are suddenly speaking out against Trump?
    Below is a conspiratorial E-mail exchange between ex-State Secretary Bowell and then-current Secretary Killary. The two discuss how to conceal electronic communications while on the job -- which is against the law!

     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    *
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/cartoon-of-the-day-055.jpg
     Boobus Americanus 1:I read in the New York Times today that Colin Powell said that Trump's foreign policy was in shambles.
     Boobus Americanus 2: Colin Powell --- good.
     
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Drag to pan
    COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

     
    Email address:

    Comments:

     
    E-mail: GreatTomatoBubble2@gmail.com

    MONDAY / OCTOBER 7, 2019

     
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for dead american world war 1
     Army recruits filled a street in New York in April 1917 soon after President Woodrow Wilson declared war on Germany. Many would be killed and dumped in ditches.
     
    New York Times:Should America Have Entered World War I?

    REBUTTAL BY
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    As far as historical accounts go, this particular piece about America's entry in World War I, submitted to Sulzberger's Slimes by Georgetown University History Professor and"noted author" Michael Kazin (cough cough), isn't so bad. Nonetheless, in spite of its relative objectivity, some important elements are missing. The depleted "Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times is pleased to add a bit of much-needed muscle to this skeletal narrative.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-vfS28N2YKo/hqdefault.jpg
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    https://static2.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11123/111238279/5118960-5050532491-45971.png
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    https://files.ctctcdn.com/57f72fd4301/315be520-5917-4e65-bdf6-72df6c4637d8.jpg
    The "distinguished" Professor Kazin from Georgetown only gets it half-right. The B-student party-boy from Rutgers gets it 100%.
    (Yet Kazin rakes in millions of dollars while we have to plead for donations and book sales! (hint-hint) Go figure.)

    Kazin: In 1917, Congress voted to enter what was then the largest and bloodiest war in history. Four days earlier, President Woodrow Wilson had sought to unite a sharply divided populace with a stirring claim that the nation “is privileged to spend her blood and her might for the principles that gave her birth and happiness and the peace which she has treasured.”
    Analysis: Nothing wrong with what Kazin wrote in those two sentences, but get a load of Woody Wilson gleefully spewing idiotic platitudes about "spending the blood" of young American men for the sake of "principles" and "peace." Disgusting.
    Kazin: The war lasted only another year and a half, but in that time, an astounding 117,000 American soldiers were killed and 202,000 wounded.
    Analysis: Horrible numbers, yet only a fraction of what each of the major European powers lost in that bloodbath. What a tragic waste!
    Kazin: Still, most Americans know little about why the United States fought in World War I, or why it mattered...World War I is less easy to explain (than World War II).
    Analysis: Actually, Professor Pointyhead,World War I is very easy to explain. Here it is in just 152 words:

    *****
    The jealous British and French wanted to take out their German economic competitor.
    The Russians allied themselves with Britain and France because they wanted to take Constantinople (aka Istanbul) from Turkey.
    The Jewish Globalists wanted to restructure the sovereign states and empires of Europe along Communist and/or "democratic" lines -- while the Jewish Zionists (many of whom were also Globalists) wanted to crush the Turkish Empire (which was allied with Germany & Austria-Hungary) so that Palestine could be stolen on their behalf.
    Toward those evil ends, the main states of Europe were pitted against each other in a game of mutual destruction in which the sole innocent party was Germany. Under false pretenses, the United States -- under the Jewish-controlled Woodrow Wilson -- was manuevered into the war on the side of Britain and France, only after the British agreed to steal Palestine from Turkey and allow Jews to start settling there(Balfour Declaration).
    *****
    Bada bing, bada boom -- done! What was so hard about that?
    Kazin: America intervened nearly three years after it began, and the “doughboys,” as our troops were called, engaged in serious combat for only a few months. More Americans in uniform died away from the battlefield — thousands from the Spanish flu — than with weapons in hand. 
    Analysis: Kazin neglects to mention that the "Spanish"-flu (which actually originated at a US Army base in Kansas) had all the indications of a US-engineered bio-weapon -- one that killed many German / Austro-Hungarian soldiers before getting out of hand and killing as many as 75-100 MILLION people worldwide!
    Kazin: After victory was achieved, Wilson’s audacious hope of making a peace that would advance democracy and national self-determination blew up in his face when the Senate refused to ratify the treaty he had signed at the Palace of Versailles.
    Analysis: Kazin makes it sound as if Wilson was a well-meaning idealist who screwed things up. In reality, Wilson (a black-mailed puppet of the Big Jews), wasn't out to "advance democracy and self-determination." Those high-sounding platitudes were just bits of bait to lure in starry-eyed suckers. The real plan for the post-war world was to begin the drive towards world government -- a New World Order whose real purpose, ironically, is and has always been to impose a global structure that is very anti-democratic and anti- "national self determination."

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    https://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/6649196-M.jpg
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    http://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-the-un-is-but-a-long-range-international-banking-apparatus-clearly-set-up-for-financial-curtis-bean-dall-67-96-88.jpg
    "...Occasionally, on a Saturday morning in the summer of 1912, Bernard Baruch would walk into the Democratic Headquarters with Woodrow Wilson in tow, leading him like one would a poodle on a string. Wilson would be quite solemn-faced in appearance....According to my friend Wilson would be given his special "indoctrination course" in politics, by several of the top advisers assembled there. The course consisted chiefly of outlining to him and his agreeing in principle to: Aiding and pushing the projected Federal Reserve Bank Legislation through Congress when Paul Warburg approved the final draft of the opposed Act, then being worked on....(And) if called upon, to lend a sympathetic ear and aid indicated "policy" if war should break out in Europe....Wilson dutifully received and absorbed his indoctrination, shook hands all around, and then departed...."
    -- From: FDR: My Explited Father-in-Law, By Curtis Dall, son-in-law of FDR (Image 3)

    Kazin: But attention should be paid. America’s decision to join the Allies was a turning point in world history. It altered the fortunes of the war and the course of the 20th century — and not necessarily for the better.
    Analysis: The professor gets one right.
    Kazin: Its entry most likely foreclosed the possibility of a negotiated peace among belligerent powers that were exhausted from years mired in trench warfare.
    Analysis: Correct! Britain and France were seriously considering Germany's request to simply stop the war and return to the pre-war status quo. It was only US entry (engineered by the usual suspects) that encouraged the Allies to drag out the war until the "Yanks" could arrive.
    Kazin: Although the American Expeditionary Force did not engage in combat for long, the looming threat of several million fresh troops led German generals to launch a last, desperate series of offensives. When that campaign collapsed, Germany’s defeat was inevitable.
    Analysis: True, but Kazin omits the reason why the great German Spring Offensive of 1918 (after stunning initial success) ultimately fizzled out and failed -- namely, because Jewish-Marxist-Zionist Labor Union leaders called for factory strikes right when Germany was about to win the war before the Yanks arrived. Adding to the internal subversion were the Jewish-owned newspapers which suddenly turned pessimistic and negative on the war effort. After the war, this undeniable Jewish subversion came to be referred to as "the stab in the back."
    Kazin: How would the war have ended if America had not intervened? The carnage might have continued for another year or two until citizens in the warring nations, who were already protesting the endless sacrifices required, forced their leaders to reach a settlement. If the Allies, led by France and Britain, had not won a total victory, there would have been no punitive peace treaty like that completed at Versailles, no stab-in-the-back allegations by resentful Germans, and thus no rise, much less triumph, of Hitler and the Nazis. The next world war, with its 50 million deaths, would probably not have occurred.
    Analysis: All true. But notice how Kazin references the "stab-in-the-back allegations" without defining the context of the term in regard to the bizarre German surrender of November 11, 1918. This clearly indicates that Kazin knows what happened but cannot (or will not) to tell us -- not if he expects to keep his cushy tenured position at Georgetown.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-wLbmEfYYDRU/T2JhaMn1PyI/AAAAAAAAAjU/p95ZCfiW1UI/s1600/sb1942.jpg
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/marcuse/projects/reception/recimages/193DolchstossJewGerman.jpg
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e5/Stab-in-the-back_cartoon_1924.jpg/600px-Stab-in-the-back_cartoon_1924.jpg
    Post-World War I cartoons depict the fact that Germany was "stabbed in the back" by home-front Jews (Zionists and Communists) who wanted Germany and Turkey to lose the war.

    Kazin: The foes of militarism in the United States had tried to prevent such horrors. ... They mounted street demonstrations, attracted prominent leaders from the labor and suffrage movements, and ran antiwar candidates for local and federal office.
    Analysis: Again, all true. But Kazin makes it sound as though only "liberals" (labor and women's suffrage) opposed the war, ignoring the fact that many conservatives were also against Wilson's warmongering.
    Kazin: They also gained the support of Henry Ford, who chartered a ship full of activists who crossed the Atlantic to plead with the heads of neutral nations to broker a peace settlement.
    Analysis:Indeed, before America even became involved, Ford was so opposed to the war that, in 1915, the Oscar II ocean liner was commissioned by him to become The Peace Ship. The peace mission was mostly mocked by the warmongering Fake News at the time (especially in Britain & France) as a ridiculous idea. The ship was dubbed, "To Good Ship Nutty.” After the war, Ford would blame "the International Jew" for both bringing about the war -- and later dragging the United States in under false pretexts.

    Kazin: Once the United States did enter the fray, Wilson, with the aid of the courts, prosecuted opponents of the war who refused to fall in line. Under the Espionage and Sedition Acts, thousands were arrested for such “crimes” as giving speeches against the draft and calling the Army “a God damned legalized murder machine.”
    Analysis: Spot on.
    Kazin: The intervention led to big changes in America, as well as the world. It began the creation of a political order most citizens now take for granted, even as some protest against it: a state equipped to fight war after war abroad while keeping a close watch on allegedly subversive activities at home.
    Analysis: Spot on.
    Kazin: The larger aim of American foreign policy under both liberal and conservative presidents had remained much the same: to make the world “safe for democracy,” as our leaders define it. To achieve that purpose required another innovation of World War I: a military-industrial establishment funded, then partly and now completely, by income taxes.
    Analysis: Spot on.
    *****
    Though there is nothing overtly false in Kazin's piece, and it does offer up quite a bit of useful data, we still have to grade it a "C-" for the simple reason that the unsuspecting reader will come away with the grossly mistaken impression that American entry into World War I was a historical "blunder" based upon misguided idealism. In reality, the event was a stroke of genius -- evil genius to be precise -- planned and executed by (((the usual suspects))) for the usual reasons, namely: the advancement of Globalism (post-war "League of Nations") and its evil overlapping cousin -- Zionism (post-war Jewish immigration to British-occupied Palestine).
     
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/The-International-Jew-Volumes-I-II-cover.jpg
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for ford foundation logo
     1. British cartoon mocking Ford's "Peace Ship" for trying to end the still-young war in 1915 //  2. Henry Ford eventually learned the truth about World War I -- claiming that several honest Jews had informed him about the International Jewish hand involved in engineering the war. Ford then tried to warn the world about "The International Jew." Not long after his death in 1947, the Globalists seized control of his foundation and have used it ever since to promote the very Globalism that Ford had tried to expose (before being pressured into shutting up).
    *
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/cartoon-of-the-day-055.jpg
    Boobus Americanus 1: I read an opinion piece by a distinguished professor of History in the New York Times today. He questioned the wisdom of the United States entering World War I.
    Boobus Americanus 2: What a senseless tragedy that war was.

           Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Drag to pan
      St. Sugar: Tragic, yess, Boobuss. But it wass not "ssenseless." The New World Order crime gang achieved some very important objectivess.
     Editor: Globalism, Communism and Zionism --- the big winners of BOTH World Wars.
    *
    COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

     
    Email address:

    Comments:

     
    greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
     


    FRIDAY / OCTOBER 4, 2019

     
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Representative Adam B. Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, knew some details of the allegations against President Trump before the C.I.A. officer filed a whistle-blower complaint.
    Slimes Caption: Representative Adam B. Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, knew some details of the allegations against President Trump before the C.I.A. officer filed a whistle-blower complaint.

    New York Times:Schiff Got Early Account of Accusations as Whistle-Blower’s Concerns Grew


    REBUTTAL BY
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Even by the cesspoolish standards of the Demonrat-Communist Party of America, the Satanic evil of that putrid little shifty-eyed, pencil-necked Adam Schiff  (cough cough) is truly breath-taking and heart-attack-inducing to behold. Most Demonrats tend to be a bit more subtle in their deception. Not so for House Intelligence Chairman Schiff (D-CA) -- whose "chutzpah" -- even by Jew standards -- is off the charts! Schitt just boldly invents stuff and tries to sell it without any packaging -- prompting Trump to openly called him "sick,""treasonous" and a "lowlife."
     
    One would think that in the aftermath of the discredited hoax of "Russian-Gate" -- which Schiff pushed so hard and for so long -- that he would have been humbled enough by now to at least realize that it would not be in the best interests of his Communist Party to kindle and inflame a new hoax so soon after the old one crumbled. But now we learn -- as confirmed by this "limited hangout" cover-up brought to you by Sulzberger's equally dishonest Jew York Slimes -- that Schitt was handling the still-unnamed CIA "whistleblower" whose allegations have triggered "Ukraine-Gate" -- the latest ineffective effort to take down Trump.
     
     
     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for gay pride schiff
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for trump on  schiff
    1. From his bug-eyes to his mannerisms to his speech -- everything about this man screams "weirdo!" // 2.  Little Adam likes rainbows. //3. Trump, from the Oval Office: "Schiff should be looked at for treason. 
     
    What accounts for this quixotic (a $10 word for exceedingly unrealistic and impractical)and seemingly suicidal recklessness on the part of Schitt? Does he honestly believe that Ukraine-Gate -- which we believe was part of a trap set by Trump himself -- will actually take out Trump? Does he not see how badly he and his Communist Party are being damaged in "the court of public opinion" by this libelous lunacy? Well, you see, boys and girls, Schitt is neither unrealistic nor is he blind. His manifest desperation represents, in our informed opinion, the dying last grasps for driftwood of a drowning man who, although he knows what's coming, must instinctively, and illogically, grasp anyway.
     
    The mere fact that Schitt is a Demonrat in good standing with his evil party is, in and of itself, evidence that he must be involved in more corruption than one could shake a hammer and sickle at. That goes without saying! Surely, anxiety over the skeletons in his closet must be keeping Schitt a shittin' himself. But the depleted "Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times is convinced that Schitt's skeletons are much more serious than run-of-the-mill financial corruption or even sedition and treason. There's something waaaay darker -- and we "hope and pray" that it will eventually be exposed. Intrigued?
     
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image
     
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image

    1 & 2. Schiff's full time obsession is to take down Donald Trump // 3. Dating back to 2017, Q Anon has posted, on several occasions: "Those with the most to lose are the loudest."
    -- What's in your closet, Mr. Schitt?
     
     
    You see, the scuttlebutt is that little Adam -- who, for 25 years, was a mentor affiliated with the controversial "Big Brother" program (here) -- is a pedo-monster. Such a moral-mental-spiritual depravity is not at all uncommon amongst the political "elite" of the decadent West -- hence Trump's calculated use of the word "sick" to describe him. Though we can present no "smoking gun" evidence to support the rumors swirling about him, we do suspect that someone has the evidence and that this nervous buy-eyed demon knows it. He has got to try and take out Trump -- even if means his own self-destruction.
     
    Let's wait and see what comes out about little Schitt. In the meantime, consider these creepy images.
     
     
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for adam schiff haiti baby
    1 & 2. During the 1980's, weirdo Schitt "Big Brothered" a young Black boy named David McMillan -- who went on to become a full blown libtard TV writer. The Big Brother Program has long been plagued by allegations of rampant sex abuse of minors. (here) /// 3. Schitt tweeted out an image of himself with a Black baby in Haiti -- a known haven for child-sex-traffickers and pedo-monster-murderers. He truly looks like he wants to rape the child!
     
     
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for ed buck and adam schiff
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image
    1. Schiff with Demonrat mega-donor Ed Buck --- a big backer of Schiff. // 2. Buck, now in prison, got his jollies off by drugging and raping black boys and young Black men.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/cartoon-of-the-day-055.jpg
    Boobus Americanus 1: I read in today's New York Times that Adam Schiff may have been working with that whistleblower all along.
    Boobus Americanus 2: Well, I'm not a Trump fan --- but it appears to me that this Schiff character is a bit shifty himself -- no pun intended.

          Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Drag to pan
      St. Sugar:  It's much worse than you can imagine, Boobuss!
     Editor: Schiff has boy-rapist written all over his guilty face.
    *
    COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

     
    Email address:

    Comments:

     
    greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
     

    THURSDAY / OCTOBER 3, 2019

     

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Hania Rosenberg, who now lives in Stockholm, Sweden, survived the Holohoax and is now trying to get back the properties that her family had in Poland

    New York Times:Holocaust Survivors in Poland Find Restitution Claims ‘Like a Carousel’


    REBUTTAL BY
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Today's twist on the song that doesn't end about the event that never happened, sung for us by Slimes scribbler Nina Siegal(cough cough), features a Polish (now "Swedish") Jewess named Hania Rosenberg whose family lost property during World War II. Of course, the many millions of Europeans who lost lives, loved ones, limbs or property during the great bloodbath for Globalism & Zionism don't merit any of our tears 75 years after the fact. No sir, only the chosenites must be made whole again.
     
    The ever-groveling Germans catch a break with this piece as the government of increasingly "anti-Semitic" Poland is slammed for not being efficient enough when it comes to restoring lost property to the "survivors ." Pass the tissues and cue the violins. Let's clean up some of this mushy filth from the article:
     
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/04/25/arts/ninasiegal/ninasiegal-jumbo.jpg
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    http://ninebuzz.practicalmusicianblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/SadViolinPlayer.jpg
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c1/Kleenex-small-box.jpg
    Nina Siegal (cough cough) serves up the usual sappy slop about the Holohoax.
     *
     
    Siegal: Hania Rosenberg was born in 1934 in Oswiecim, an industrial town in the Galicia region of southern Poland. The concentration and extermination camp the Germans built there after their 1939 invasion, called Auschwitz-Birkenau, would take the lives of 1.1 million people.
     
    Analysis: There is not one shred of evidence that 1.1 million people (suddenly reduced from 4 million about 20 years ago) died at Bullschwitz. No bodies, no paperwork, no forensic evidence of "gas chambers"TM, and several Jewish inmates who later stated they knew nothing about any "mass extermination" that was going on.
    Siegal: Her grandparents had a three-story house and a general store, farmland and two garden plots in the nearby town of Ledziny. During the Communist era, the house and store were expropriated. A shopping mall and new houses stand on what was once farmland. But two garden plots — still in the name of her grandfather — remain, and Ms. Rosenberg is fighting for their ownership...
    Analysis: Amazing. After all these years and with one foot already in the grave, this old yenta still can't let go of the material things.
    Siegal (quoting Hania): “In Poland, there was no official process for this: You have to go to the courts,” she said in a phone interview from Stockholm. “We did go to the courts, but it was like a carousel: You go around and around and around and around.
    Rebuttal: Cheese and crackers! What's with these frickin' people? Let it go already, Hania -- just let it go.
    Siegal: Poland is the only European Union nation that has not established formal procedures to resolve claims made by people whose property was seized during the Holocaust, according to a new report by the European Shoah Legacy Institute.
    Rebuttal: And who advocates for the return of land and property taken from the 8 million dispossessed Prussians and Sudetenland folks who were ethnically cleaned after the war? (here) No one!
    In many of those Prussian cases, Polish Jews would go "shopping" for German homes with armed Communist-Jewish partisans acting as their "realtors." Upon finding a home to the liking of the yenta of the family, the German family would be told, "She likes your home. Now get the hell out!"-- and that was the end of the transaction.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    http://www.nybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/wilson_1-052313.jpg
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    http://polandpoland.com/germansexpelled.jpg

    1. Three Million Sudetenland Germans robbed and expelled.   //  2. Five Million Prussian Germans robbed and expelled. 

    Siegal: The report, more than 1,200 pages, was based on three years of research in 47 countries that endorsed a 2009 pledge, known as the Terezin Declaration, to establish a restitution process for “immovable property” like land, homes and businesses. It found that Poland had only partly complied with an obligation to return communal Jewish property like synagogues and cemeteries.
    Analysis: From "stolen" artwork to "stolen" gold to "stolen" properties, the "gimme gimme gimme" emanating from the people who suffered the least during the war never ends, and never ceases to amaze.
    Siegal: The issue of restitution is especially fraught for Poland, which had Europe’s largest Jewish community before the war. About three million Polish Jews were murdered in the Holocaust...
    Analysis: This claim of 3 million Polish Jews is completely unverifiable because the Soviet "Iron Curtain" descended over Poland at wars' end. We have no exact figures as to how many of these "3 million" returned to Poland; how many moved to Israel; or how many relocated to a Western European country (in Hania's case, Sweden). Then there were the "survivors" that left Europe altogether for the United States, Canada, Australia, South America etc.
    The same "Iron Curtain" difficulty arises when we attempt to calculate the numbers of killed or missing Hungarian Jews, Romanian Jews, Ukrainian Jews, Baltic Jews, Russian Jews etc. What we do know is that nearly one million European Jews arrived in Israel between 1947 and 1955 (here), and about a half-million settled in the United States (here). Add in about another half-million like Hania who were settled throughout Western Europe as "DP's"(Displaced Persons), and many more who returned to their Eastern European homes -- and voila, there you have the "missing Jews."
    Siegal: The report says that Holocaust victims across Europe — not only Jews, but also Roma, gays, disabled people and others ...
    Analysis: You see that? The Jews come first, the fags and thieving Gypsies also get an honorary shout-out (as do the disabled), but the countless millions of dispossessed and displaced normal White people throughout Europe are ignored by the "European Shoah Legacy Institute."
    Siegal: Although the issue is longstanding, it has been complicated by the rise to power in 2015 of the right-wing Law and Justice Party. Party ... they emphasize that .... many minorities suffered.

    “On what basis should Poland decide that those with Jewish ancestors get compensated, whereas Belarussians, Poles, Ukrainians or Crimean Karaites, or Tatars and Germans — all of whom used to live here before the war — shouldn’t be compensated?” Jaroslaw Kaczynski, the leader of the governing party, asked supporters last year.
     
    Analysis: How "right wing"TM and even borderline "anti-Semitic"TM of the Law and Justice Party to point out that people of all nationalities, including ethnic Germans, lost property during the war.
    Siegal (quoting Kaczynski): “Is Poland able to turn back time and compensate all those who suffered in those tragic events?” he asked. “Does it mean that the descendants of poor Poles are supposed to pay the descendants of those who were rich? This is what it comes down to.”
    Analysis: If Jaroslaw Kaczynski keeps talking like that, he's liable to end up suffering a similar fate as his twin brother Lech -- the Polish President whose plane crashed while on a trip to Russia. Party boss Jaroslaw, like his late brother, is not at all liked by the Globalist crowd. In recent months, Poland's government has come under fire from the EU over its anti-immigration policy and overhaul of the country's court system, which Brussels says "undermines democracy."
    If Kaczynski and his fellow Poles are smart (and that's a big "if"), they will all drop the silly anti-Russian crap and realize who the true enemy is. A Polish defection to the Russia-China bloc would do much to diffuse the possibility of World War III and save White Poland from turning into Brown France. 

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/00/Lech_Kaczy%C5%84ski.jpg/220px-Lech_Kaczy%C5%84ski.jpg
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    http://images.csmonitor.com/csmarchives/2010/04/04-10-russian-plane.gif?alias=standard_600x400
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    http://niepoprawni.pl/cgi-bin/watermark.cgi/sites/default/files/ilustracje-publiczny/jaroslaw_kaczynski_usmiech_388.jpg
    1. Nationalist Lech Kaczynski and many other high-ranking Poles were killed in a mysterious 2010 plane crash. 2. Twin brother Jaroslaw Kaczynski, though still talking nonsense about Russia, has also defied the Globalist EU.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/cartoon-of-the-day-055.jpg
    Boobus Americanus 1: I read in today's New York Times that Poland is giving Holocaust survivors a hard time in getting their pre-war property back.
    Boobus Americanus 2: After all these years, haven't the Jews suffered enough? The Poles should be ashamed of themselves.

          Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Drag to pan
      Sugar The only thing that the Polackss have to be be asshamed about iss picking a fight with Germany at the behesst of the Globalisst Wesst.
     Editor: Sugar! The ethnic slur is totally uncalled for and will not be tolerated here. The proper terminology is "Poles."
    *
    COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

     
    Email address:

    Comments:

     
    greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
     

    WEDNESDAY / OCTOBER 2, 2019

     
      
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for michelle goldberg
    NY Times (Op-Ed): Trump’s Claims About Biden Aren’t ‘Unsupported.’ They’re Lies.
    The president’s accusations turn reality on its head and the media should say so.
     
    By MICHELLE GOLDBERG

    REBUTTAL BY
    With the possible exception of Krugman(cough cough), and maybe Friedman(cough cough), and maybeSanger(cough cough), and maybe Brooks(cough cough), and maybeRosenthal(cough cough), and maybeRosenberg(cough cough), and maybeHaberman(cough cough), and maybeKantor(cough cough), and maybeStephens(cough cough), and maybeMeyers(cough cough), and maybeCohn(cough cough), and maybeKristof (cough cough) and maybe Landler(cough cough) and maybeHerzenhorn (cough cough) --- that sow-faced swine Michele Goldberg (cough cough) may just be the boldest liar in the Slimes slanderous stable of Jewish jack-asses.  But to see her vomit out this particular lying piece of editorial excrement is especially breath-taking to behold because the lie focuses on calling Trump a liar when he is actually telling the absolute truth about the Bidens. It is a classic, clinical case of "projection" -- a favorite tactic of narcissistic psychopaths and chronic liars.
    At issue here is Trump's extremely well-founded accusation leveled at Joe Biden and his crooked ex-crack-head son, Hunter Biden. At a time when Papa Pedo Joe was in charge of matters Ukrainian, Boy Biden sat on the board of a Ukrainian oil company which was being investigated for corruption. In spite of having no experience in this field, Hunter was raking in $50,000 per month, (plus God only knows what else) just for sitting on a board! Yet, there's more smoke than that --- much more -- that Greasy Goldberg does not want her stupid and lazy readers to know about. 

     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for michelle goldberg
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for biden in ukraine
    1. Ms. Piggy's latest editorial is a TOTAL inversion of reality in which she shamelessly accuses Trump of "turning reality on its head." // 2. After the violent Soros-CIA-McCain coup of 2014, Creepy Joe was put in charge of the Ukrainian project. // 3. Hunter Biden is not only as corrupt as his pedo-creep father --- but is just as creepy. One year after the 2015 death of his equally corrupt brother, Beau Biden, Hunter, still married, began bedding the wife of his deceased brother, before they broke-up in 2018.

    To support her own lie about Trump's truth, Goldberg utilizes another tried and trusted tactic of deceivers. She calls to witness the authority of a fellow gangster named Geoffrey Pyatt -- a supporter of the Soros-CIA Ukrainian coup of 2014 and the former ambassador to Ukraine under the Obongo-Biden regime. Goldberg describes and quotes Pyatt slandering the prosecutor, Viktor Shokin -- the man who had been following the stinky scent emanating from Boy Biden and his crooked Burisma Holdings. From the article:
    "Pyatt called out the office of Viktor Shokin, then the prosecutor general of Ukraine. 'Corrupt actors within the prosecutor general’s office are making things worse by openly and aggressively undermining reform,' he said. Pyatt specifically lambasted Shokin’s office for subverting a British case against a man named Mykola Zlochevsky, Yanukovych’s former ecology minister."
    You see, according to Obongo's boy Pyatt and Sulzberger's gal Goldberg, it wasn't Burisma or Boy Biden that were crooked. No sir. It was the prosecutor! Of course.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for geoffrey pyatt
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for Viktor Shokin
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for Burisma Holdings
    1. Pyatt cited as an authoritative source??? He was part of the same Soros-Obongo-Biden Mafia which raped Ukraine! // 2. Prosecutor Shokin was fired on Biden's orders. // 3. Burisma -- a shady operation with Hunter sitting on the board while dad controlled post-coup Ukraine.

    It's bad enough that the Fake News keeps repeating the mendacious mantra that Trump's charges are "unsubstantiated." But even that that is not enough for Goldberg. The thesis of this devious douchebag's piece is that the Piranha Press should be calling the allegations out as "lies." Project much, bitch?
    Goldberg mentions the fact that Trump is running ads atacking Biden, but in a blatant "lie of omission"(yet another favorite of bullshit-artists) she, like the rest of the Fake News, refuses to run the self-incriminating quote, contained in said ad, from Creepy Pedo Joe himself. Speaking before the world-government-promoting Council on Foreign Relations in 2018, big-mouth Biden, reminiscing about his Ukraine experiences, arrogantly boasted about the mobster tactics which he employed to take down the prosecutor who was making his son nervous -- and in so doing, implicated himself and Obongo:
    **********
    JOE BIDEN: I had gotten a commitment from (the Ukrainian leaders) that they would take action against the state prosecutor and they didn't. So I said, we're not going to give you the billion dollars. They said, 'You have no authority. You're not the president. The president said ... ' I said, 'Call him (Obama).'
    I'm telling you, you're not getting the billion dollars. I'm going to be leaving here. And I think it was - what? - six hours. I looked. I said, I'm leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. (laughter)  He got fired.  (video: here)
    ***********
     
    Evidently, Ms. Goldberg and the whole stinking Hebrew hierarchy of the Slimes decided that such essential data was not"fit to print." So you see, boys and girls, the seditious scum of the earth are wrongly accusing Trump of the very thing which Biden -- acting with the full support of Obongo -- actually did, and admitted to, on camera. I'm tellin' ya -- one of these days, (((these people))) are gonna give yours truly a heart attack!
     
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for biden at cfr
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for obama ukraine
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for lying by silence
    1 & 2. Biden was taped bragging about how he muscled Ukraine into firing the prosecutor --- and with Obongo's approval. // 3. Den of thieves -- "Goodfellas" Obongo, Creepy Joe & Sleazy Hunter.
    *
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/cartoon-of-the-day-055.jpg
     Boobus Americanus 1:I read in the New York Times today that Trump's accusations against Joe Biden are false.
     Boobus Americanus 2: I think they are both dirty.

    COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

     
    Email address:

    Comments:

     
    E-mail: GreatTomatoBubble2@gmail.com

    TUESDAY / OCTOBER 1, 2019

     
      
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Roy Cohn questioned a witness in 1954 at a United States Senate hearing.
    NY Times: Inside the F.B.I. File of Trump’s Mentor, Roy Cohn
    The thick file is a timely reminder of the unusual realm that Trump's feared mentor inhabited.
     
    By The Editorial Board

    REBUTTAL BY
    Roy Cohn -- the young right-hand man of the late great St. Joseph McCarthy of Wisconsin -- has been dead for 33 years now. But if any of "youse guys" track the Fake News as closely as the depleted "Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times does, you would surely have noticed the bizarre rash of Roy Cohn articles (all of them negative) that have been published over just the past week. In addition to today's Slimes' slander, here are just a few headlines of recent days:
     
    • NY Daily News: Blame lawyer Roy Cohn for Donald Trump’s nasty political tactics, documentary says

    • Politico: The Final Lesson Donald Trump Never Learned From Roy Cohn

    • Raw Story: ‘Echoes of Roy Cohn’: Trump is Turning Into His Former Mentor
    • The Forward: How Roy Cohn's Shame Made Him and Trump Shameless

    Why have (((they))) turned on the propaganda geyser and resurrected Cohn, just to stomp on his remains all over again, you ask? Well, you see, Cohn, although both a Jew and a closet homosexual, was a talented brass-knuckled fighting lawyer who used his legal combativeness to fight Communists (among others). And long after McCarthy was dead and gone, Cohn -- who could have ingratiated himself into polite New York Society simply by saying that he had made a youthful mistake -- never once apologized for working with the heroic Senator -- defending him until the time of his own death (of AIDS) in 1986. An attack on Cohn is an attack on McCarthy; but more significantly, it's an attack, by direct association, on the man who Cohn "mentored" back in the 1970's / 80's -- another anti-Establishmentarian hated by the Marxists / Globalists -- a younger Donald Trump.

     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for roy cohn joe mccarthy
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    WHERE’S MY ROY COHN? (Sony Classics) — The life of the notorious lawyer and political player (including mentor to President Donald Trump) gets the big-screen treatment from director Matt Tyrnauer (“Studio 54,” “Scotty and the Secret History of Hollywood”), featuring interviews with Roger Stone and Annie Roiphe. - Original Credit: Sony Classics
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for trump cohn
    1. On serving McCarthy --  Cohn: "I went to work for Joe McCarthy in January 1953 and was gone by the fall of ’54. Does anybody doubt that is how my obituary will open?  -- which is exactly how I want it to read.” /// 2 & 3. He later served Trump.

    The article sums up Cohn's work for McCarthy and Trump:
    "Cohn had made his name prosecuting Julius and Ethel Rosenberg for espionage — and pressing for their execution— and acting as Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Communist-hunting right hand in the 1950s. 
    (Trump and Cohn) first joined forces when Trump was a young real estate developer being sued by the Justice Department, with his father, for refusing to rent apartments to black tenants.Mr. Cohn urged against settling the case, as Mr. Trump was considering.
    'Tell them to go to hell and fight the thing in court,’ Mr. Trump later recalled Mr. Cohn telling him. The Trumps ultimately did settle, but not before filing a $100 million countersuit against the government. It was the start of a relationship during which Mr. Cohn helped Mr. Trump close signature construction deals, sued the National Football League for conspiring against his client and prepared an onerous prenuptial agreement for Mr. Trump’s first wife."
    Given how close Cohn and Trump were, we suspect that the "mentor" schooled the student very well as to the truth about "McCarthyism ."And now, the same dark "Deep State" forces and the same sinister tactics which killed the McCarthy hearings (and ultimately, the man himself) are being utilized for the purpose of bringing down Trump.

     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image
    1. Commie Jews of New York take to the streets to protest the electrocution death sentence handed out to the Rosenbergs. // 2. Cohn remained proud of his role in frying the Communist Rosenbergs in the electric chair --- and the Left hasn't forgotten.  // 3. The title of Sony Pictures recent film, "Where's my Roy Cohn?" is a quote from Donald Trump. Cohn's resurrection is an attempt to smear Trump. States film-makerMatt Tyrnauer: Roy Cohn is the creator of Donald Trump."
    *
     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Drag to pan
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for "Bully. Coward. Victim. The Story of Roy Cohn,"
    "Bully. Coward. Victim. The Story of Roy Cohn,"directed by the Rosenberg’s granddaughter, Ivy Meeropol(Image 2), premiered at th e New York Film Festival this past Sunday. It will run on HBO in Election Year 2020. Its debut comes just 9 days after the release of Tyrnauer’s,'Where’s My Roy Cohn?'


    Perhaps the greatest honor paid to Roy Cohn is last week's attack which appeared in the Jewish "Forward" (a leftist publication that dates back to its openly Marxist and Yiddish language days of 1897). A snippet from the aforementioned Forward piece, vomited out by P J Grisar(cough cough):
    "Roy Cohn -- a fixer, a liar, a self-loathing Jew and viciously homophobic homosexual, he seized on the Big Lie advanced by Adolf Hitler to advocate for his clients, smear his opponents and shield himself from a mountain of indictments. His first case to gain national attention sent Julius and Ethel Rosenberg to their deaths. Towards the end of his life, he was the consigliere of Donald Trump, pushing the young real estate scion to countersue the government in a housing discrimination case.
    A physical and moral grotesque, called, in an extensive 1978 Esquire profile by Ken Auletta, “the personification of evil,” he relished his reputation as a prince of darkness."
    Well, Cohn may have, in private, played for the pink team; but there is some redemption in hating one's own proclivity toward sodomy. At least he  wasn't "proud." Seriously, this kind of unhinged hatred coming from the likes of TheForward amounts to the best long-after-the-fact eulogy that a man can get. Cohn would be honored to have such words spoken about him, coming from Marxists, that is. Such ironic credibility statements aimed at Cohn -- and by inference, Trump -- constitute yet another good indicator that Trump -- like Joe McCarthy -- has got the Globalists on the defensive. Let's just hope he can succeed where "St. Joseph" could not.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for P J Grisar
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for st joseph of wisconsin
    *
    *Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for joe mccarthy  conspiracy so immense quote
    1. When a little Yiddish greaseball like PJ Grisar spews venom at the late Roy Cohn -- calling him a "homophobe" and a "self-hating Jew" -- it's a true compliment to Joe McCarthy's departed sidekick. // 2. A MUST READ! --- St. Joseph of Wisconsin (here)







    EISENHAUER THE TERRIBLE SWEDISH JEW - GOD, I HATE THE GERMANS.


    THE CRYING WOMAN OF SUDETENLAND
     Oh oh. Somebody is BUSTED! The "sad woman" was cut out of context so that you wouldn't see the whole picture. Evidently the more sensitive type, she is crying TEARS OF JOY! (very common among happy German women at the time) at the sight of liberating German troops. Had the photo included the reverent woman in the center, and the euphoric woman on the left, we would have figured that out. That's why the newspapers of yesterday and the history books of today cut the other two ladies out.
    "Fake History is the Fake News that has passed into the rearview mirror."
    -- Mike King

    [ See also Eisenhauer's death camps! ]

    Eisenhower'sCrusade in Europeis a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill's Second World War total 4,448 pages; and
    de Gaulle's three-volume M
    é
    moires de guerre is 2,054 pages.  

    In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find
     

    no mention either of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war." 

    RACIST JEW DWIGHT DAVID EISENHAUER:
    NO "social equality" or "negro""to court my daughter"!
     

    Betty Lou Smith Hanson
    https://fathersmanifesto.net/eisenhower.htm#SWEDISH%20JEW

         "Note: Remember the photo of Ike's West Point
    yearbook picture when he was dubbed "IKE, THE TERRIBLE
    SWEDISH JEW"? By the way, he was next, or nearly so, to
    the last in his class. This article was first printed
    in 1990, but we thought it was meaningfull to reprint
    it now.

         (Note: During Cadet Eisenhower's time at West
    Point Academy, Eisenhower was summoned to the office of
    the headmaster and was asked some pointed questions. At
    the time, it was routine procedure to test a cadet's
    blood to insure White racial integrity.

         Apparently there was a question of Eisenhower's
    racial lineage and this was brought to Eisenhower's
    attention by the headmaster. When asked if he was part
    Oriental, Eisenhower replied in the negative. After
    some discussion, Eisenhower admitted having some Jewish
    background.
    The headmaster then reportedly said,
    "That's where you get your Oriental blood?". Although
    he was allowed to remain at the academy, word got
    around since this was a time in history when non-Whites
    were not allowed into the academy.

         Later, in Eisenhower's West Point Military Academy
    graduating class yearbook, published in 1915,
    Eisenhower is identified as a "terrible Swedish Jew.
    "

         Wherever Eisenhower went during his military
    career, Eisenhower's Jewish background and secondary
    manifesting behavior was a concern to his fellow
    officers.

         During World War II when Col. Eisenhower was
    working for Gen. Douglas McArthur in the South Pacific,
    McArthur protested to his superiors in Washington (DC)
    that Eisenhower was incompetent and that he did not
    want Eisenhower on his staff.

         In 1943, Washington not only transferred Col.
    Eisenhower to Europe but promoted him over more than 30 more experienced senior officers to five star general
    and placed him in charge of all the US forces in
    Europe.
    Thus it comes as no surprise that General
    George Patton, a real Aryan warrior, hated Eisenhower.)"




    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.


    14th Amdt
    19th Amdt
     

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    eisenhower.jpg (3665 bytes)


    Eisenhower the "Swedish jew"?

    "God, I hate the Germans..." --Dwight David Eisenhower
    in a letter to his wife in September, 1944
    "We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations.  Three of these involved our own country.  Despite these holocausts ..."
    �although it might be necessary to grant blacks certain political rights, this does not mean social equality or that a negro should court my daughter"
    White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters
    As observed, Eisenhower was little different from the general run of whites who held ambivalent views on race and integration, but his default position was one of patronization of blacks.   One historian reported that when he talked to eager African American audiences, Ike would remove his glasses and say, �Now, you people have to be patient.�  He had served for forty years in a segregated army and believed, as he told the Senate Armed Services Committee in 1948, that segregation should continue at the platoon level and below.  He told jokes about black people in bull sessions during the campaign and even in the White House.  He confided to a friend that he did not believe the races need socialize or that �a Negro should court my daughter.�  In office as president, Eisenhower and his advisors worried constantly about


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    bullet
    Is this man a war criminal?
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    bullet
    Is this man a jew?
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    bullet
    By renaming POWs as DEFs, he bypassed the Geneva Convention, a typical jew mentality.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    bullet
    Changing his name from Eisenhauer to Eisenhower is a typical jew tactic. 

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule
    A comparison of German censuses of 1946 and 1950 shows the effect of food shortages. The 1950 census showed 5.7 million people fewer than there should have been according to the number of people recorded in the 1946 census, minus officially reported deaths, plus births and "immigrants" (people expelled from the east and returning prisoners) in the period from 1946 to 1950. The total tally of unacknowledged deaths among prisoners, refugees and non-expelled civilians comes to about nine million people between 1945 and 1950, far more than the number who died during the war itself. All of these deaths were surplus to those actually reported. Moreover, those deaths occurred in peacetime while the world media did not bother to report of them.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule
    The Missing Holocaust
    "I've checked out Churchill's Second World War and the statement
    is quite correct” not a single mention of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a
    'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war.


    This is astonishing.  How can it be explained?

    Eisenhower'sCrusade in Europeis a book of 559 pages; the six
    volumes of Churchill's Second World War total 4,448 pages; and
    de Gaulle's three-volume M
    émoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.  In this
    mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including
    the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find
    no mention either of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war."

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule

    Eisenhower Had Jewish Blood

    West Point yearbook
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    wpe1BC.jpg (89780 bytes)




    Eisenhower Questioned
    West Point was very conscious of any 'Non-White' candidates. It was obvious from Eisenhower's appearance that he was carrying another race's blood. The headmaster quizzed him and he admitted he had Jewish ancestors. His father was a Swedish Jew who married a Swedish gentile woman.
    During World War II when Col. Eisenhower was working for Gen. Douglas McArthur in the South Pacific, McArthur protested to his superiors in Washington (DC) that Eisenhower was incompetent and that he did not want Eisenhower on his staff. In 1943, Washington not only transferred Col. Eisenhower to Europe but promoted him over more than 30 more experienced senior officers to five star general and placed him in charge of all the US forces in Europe.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.



    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    wpe1BD.jpg (31559 bytes)











    Eisenhower Is A derivative Of Eisenhauer A Jewish Name
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.



    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.






     


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Eisenhower Was Considered Incompetent
    During World War II when Col. Eisenhower was working for Gen. Douglas McArthur in the South Pacific, McArthur protested to his superiors in Washington (DC) that Eisenhower was incompetent and that he did not want Eisenhower on his staff. In 1943, Washington not only transferred Col. Eisenhower to Europe but promoted him over more than 30 more experienced senior officers to five star general and placed him in charge of all the US forces in Europe.
     

    Bernard Baruch was behind Eisenhower
    His military promotions on the eve of WWII and during the war are curious to say the least. Zionists found an Army officer who had been a military failure until Bernard Baruch promoted him to General.
    His actions and responsibilities during and after the war: direct, personal negotiations with Stalin on the placements of the armies (and the surrender of territory won by Americans, with the ceding of that territory to the Russians).

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    wpe101.jpg (4008 bytes)


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    The massacre of surrendered Germans at Dachau, the fire bombing of Dresden, Operation Keelhaul, and the intentional starvationof over 1,250,000 "disarmed enemy forces" all clearly mark him as a war criminal and an embarrassment. Dresden video
    In 1952, although he had been a Democrat most of his life, Baruch endorsed Dwight D. Eisenhower for president.
    Interesting pictures










    Eisenhower flaunts his mistress

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.







    West Point was very conscious of any ' Non-White' candidates. It was obvious from Eisenhower's appearance that he was carrying another race's blood. The headmaster quizzed him and he admitted he had Jewish ancestors
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    eisenhowerswedishjew.jpg (89780 bytes)
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule
    "It was clear in 1952 that the Republicans would return to the White House. Harry Truman* had more problems than the Alger Hiss scandal. "Containment" was simply not working. Sicne the concept's origination, hundreds of millions of people had fallen under Communist domination. Americans sensed the need for a strong new leader who could stand up to the Soviets. The favorite of the GOP's rank and file was Senator Robert Taft of Ohio, the son of the former President, and an outspoken foe of Communism.

    Douglas Macarthur openly supported Taft, who entertained plans to make the general his running mate. It was the Establishment's aversion to this candidacy that brought Dwight D. Eisenhower forward.

    In 1941, the year we went to war, Eisenhower or "Ike", was a lieutenant colonel who had never seen a battle in his life. Yet by 1943 he had become a four-star general and supreme commander of the Allied forces in Western Europe...After the war Eisenhower commanded U.S. occupation forces in Germany. He returned home to become US Chief of Staff...Bernanrd Baruch became a close acquaintance. Althihg he had no academic background, Eisenhower was made president of Columbia University in 1948. He joined the Council on Foreign Relations,...

    The Establishment knew that to divest Taft and Macarthur of the Republican nomination, they would have to present a candidate who looked incredibly tough and anti-Communist. General Eisenhower, who was still wearing an aura of World War II glory, became their choice.

    By no stretch of the imagination was Ike a Republican teaditionalist. In fact, until he ran, he had no party affiliation...At the Republican nominating convention, "dirty tricks" abounded. The rules for selecting delegates were changed; Taft delegations from Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas were thrown out and replaced by Eisenhower's supporters...Once again, the Establishment had succeeded in controlling both parties..."

    The SHADOWS OF POWER, by James Perloff. pp. 102-103.     

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    * Since the inauguration of perpetual peace by the United Notions, only two Presidents, Sheeny Truman (20) and a crook from Texas (21), have had the fun of shipping large numbers of American men to be slaughtered on the other side of the globe, and creating an excuse for massively increased taxation to bleed the boobs some more.
       
    (20. His father was a Sheeny, his mother, a White woman, so he was not a Jew by orthodox standards.)

    (21. Johnson, a small-time politician, on whom see J. Evetts Haley, A Texan Looks at Lyndon, was married to and supervised by a Kikess, who probably guided him to power.

    His character is adequately shown by the fact that he had or simulated a tantrum when some Vietnamese boats supposedly fired at an American destroyer, but when the Kikes bombed and torpedoed the U.S.S. Liberty, killed many American sailors, and tried to sink the little ship without survivors so that they could blame the Egyptians, Lyndon personally forbade the ships of the U.S. Navy near the scene to go to the assistance of the ship that had been detached from their squadron and personally expressed the hope that the Sheenies would succeed in killing all those stupid American swine on the American naval vessel. He was not impeached, convicted of high treason, and shot.)

    http://www.revilo-oliver.com/rpo/Surprise_Surprise.html

    "It is noteworthy that Rabbi Gruenewald ignores the fact that Truman's father was a Sheeny. The pious rabbi may have been applying the orthodox criterion that the sons of Jews by White women are not really Jews, or he may have thought it tactless to mention that Americans, with their simplistic notions of heredity, thought Truman half-Jewish but were evidently not alarmed. A little later, he likewise makes no mention of the Jews' share of Franklin Roosevelt.)"

    http://www.revilo-oliver.com/rpo/Poor_Old_Ronnie.html

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    Eisenhower: JEW/NEGRO ANCESTRY

    The following document was faxed to Richard Claypool [Head of U.S. Presidential Libraries, Maryland] on June 16th 2002 , at (301) 837 3218 , concerning Anne Morrow's identity investigation. A slightly modified version was also faxed on this same date to Harold Holt [Executive Director, Dwight D. Eisenhower Library , Kansas] , at (785) 263 4218.

    "...Anne Morrow & myself have discovered that the name & spelling of Eisenhower was & has been corrupted from it's original spelling Eisenhauer. Although your establishment discounts Eisenhower's Jewish &/or Negro ancestry [see; http://www.Palatinepress.com/images/teasleyletter2.gif] the corruption of the original spelling , to the existing & publicly embraced & accepted Eisenhower implies the former President's descendents was a Jewish , perhaps even a German bloodline. This further supports Anne Morrow's story & that she in fact descended from "old , old blood out of Europe." Anne Morrow & myself have substantiated that the reason for the Eisenhauer name corruption to Eisenhower was merely for public relations during World War II & through-out the Cold War , & to cloak the true heritage & bloodline of Dwight D. Eisenhower. This corruption was positively reflected & perpetuated most importantly within the confines of education circles.

     The names Campbell , Gabbard & Morrow seem to be interlocked & are seemingly different names for the same bloodline , which is intended to hide the heritage & origins of an Eisenhauer (Eisenhower) line which extends back into Europe (under most likely , many other different names)."

    http://www.palatinepress.com/ashley_otooole_letter_11june02.html
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule

    Dear DJ,

    The following document was faxed to Richard Claypool [Head of U.S. Presidential Libraries, Maryland] on June 16th 2002 , at (301) 837 3218 , concerning Anne Morrow's identity investigation. A slightly modified version was also faxed on this same date to Harold Holt [Executive Director, Dwight D. Eisenhower Library , Kansas] , at (785) 263 4218.

    It was Anne Morrow who confided in me , many months ago , after I published a non-related article in my independently owned & operated publication , BEACHHEAD , her belief that she was in fact the illegitimiate daughter of former U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower & her biological mother may in fact be Dwight D. Eisenhower's former driver , Kay Summersby. Rumours were confirmed in 1975 , when Kay Summersby wrote a book titled; "Past Forgetting; My Love Affair With Dwight D. Eisenhower". It was Mr.Eisenhower's superior General George Marshall who quashed a plan by Dwight D. Eisenhower to divorce his wife Mamie & marry Summersby. It has been stated , General.Marshall threatened to bust Eisenhower out of the military while fighting in Europe [World War II] , if he was to go ahead & marry Summersby & divorce Mamie. As docummented , General George Marshall served in President Truman's Cabinet , as Secretary of State & then as , Secretary of Defense.

    Through my own genealogical research I have established a definite link betweeen the names Campbell , Gabbard , Morrow & Eisenhower. However , Anne Morrow & myself have discovered that the name & spelling of Eisenhower was & has been corrupted from it's original spelling Eisenhauer. Although your establishment discounts Eisenhower's Jewish &/or Negro ancestry [see; http://www.Palatinepress.com/images/teasleyletter2.gif] the corruption of the original spelling , to the existing & publicly embraced & accepted Eisenhower implies the former President's descendents was a Jewish , perhaps even a German bloodline. This further supports Anne Morrow's story & that she in fact descended from "old , old blood out of Europe." Anne Morrow & myself have substantiated that the reason for the Eisenhauer name corruption to Eisenhower was merely for public relations during World War II & through-out the Cold War , & to cloak the true heritage & bloodline of Dwight D. Eisenhower. This corruption was positively reflected & perpetuated most importantly within the confines of education circles.


     James W. von Brunn (http://www.holywesternempire.org/bio.html) writes:

    "General DWIGHT EISENHOWER (appropriately named "The Swedish Jew" by fellow West Point cadets) was

    promoted over the heads of many more qualified officers for a reason. He agreed, apparently, to exchange America's honor quid pro quo for 5-Stars and glory. After the war, at the dedication of a New York City park honoring the Bernard Baruch family, key-note speaker Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, USA-Ret., admitted: As a young unknown major I took the wisest step of my life. I consulted Mr. Baruch. (General Dwight D. Eisenhower, U.S. Army), cited by A.K. CHESTERTON, op. cit., The New Unhappy Lords.)





    "...it is hard to escape the conclusion that Dwight Eisenhower was a war criminal of epic proportions. His (DEF) [POW camp] policy killed more Germans in peace than were killed in the European Theatre.......one Allied officer compared the American camps to Buchenwald........It is known, and will be documented in my upcoming book in newsprint format, that the Allies had sufficient stockpiles of food and medicine to care for these German soldiers. This was deliberately and intentionally denied them."






    Professor Revilo P. Oliver (February 1992):

    The real influx of savages began in the administration of the filthy mongrel called Eisenhower, noted for his open and vicious hatred of Germans and dissimulated hatred of other Aryans, and his scrapping of what was left of the American Constitution.


    "Canada was thus ready for the next act in her enemies' program, and one is reminded of the trick used so effectively in the United States when the Republican Party was bought to install in the White House "Barney" Baruch's tool, a mongrel named Eisenhower.(5)

    (5. Eisenhower's mother was probably a quadroon. His features were distinctly Negroid when he was a cadet at West Point, where he was barely able to "squeak through" to a commission.)



    ALSO: "It is noteworthy that Rabbi Gruenewald ignores the fact that Truman's father was a Sheeny. The pious rabbi may have been applying the orthodox criterion that the sons of Jews by White women are not really Jews, or he may have thought it tactless to mention that Americans, with their simplistic notions of heredity, thought Truman half-Jewish but were evidently not alarmed. A little later, he likewise makes no mention of the Jews' share of Franklin Roosevelt" (REVILO OLIVER) http://www.resist.com/Articles/rpo/1987_Poor_Old_Ronnie.html

    The issue of "Life" I have cited contains other significant photographs: the father of the disgusting creature named Harry Truman was obviously a Sheeny; the unfortunate mother seems to be a White woman.)


    Following WWII, the part negro Eisenhower reclassified surrendering German forces as "unarmed enemy forces", thus removing them from the protection of the Geneva Convention which applied to "prisoners of war". This gave them the latitude to starve to death over one million German "combatants". Read Bacque's Other Losses. There are two printings. Seek the Canadian version as the American version has been tainted by jew sanitization.


    Kill the Best Gentiles by James Von Brunn

    This new book is available for free download of the first six chapters. This carefully documented treatise exposes the Jews and explains what you must do to protect your White family. Kill the Best Gentiles! Is a must for every concerned parent and a manual for every student of World History.

    Surf over and check it out at:
             <http://www.holywesternempire.org/page2.html>

    ----------------------------------------------------------

    >From FAEM.com
    http://www.faem.com/maguire/goodike.htm




    15 August 2002
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Dear Mr. Maguire
    In your article Elite American Political Leadership you mention Eisenhower's nickname "The Swedish Jew". I am interested to know how he got that nickname. To my knowledge Eisenhower did not have anything to do with Sweden.

    Best Regards -- Mr. J. -- Northern Europa

    PS! I am an avid FAEM-reader and have been for the last two years. I have read almost everything posted on the site. Dear Mr. J.,

    <b>Eisenhower was nicknamed "The Swedish Jew" as a cadet at the United States Military Academy at West Point. In Ike's time USMA cadets were required to be 100% white and non-negroid, or as close to that as medical doctors and geneological research could then ascertain. Serious official questions arose about Ike's obvious part non-white genetic heritage. These appeared to be negroid in origin. "Ike" explained this away as being due to a Jewish ancestor from Sweden, hence the nickname "The Swedish Jew". </b>

    Military Academy cadets and other officer candidates get to know each other extremely well during their schooling, provided it's conducted on an intensive basis as U.S. officer schooling formerly was. Everyone is at close quarters running 24/7. There's no place to hide character traits in those conditions. Cadet nicknames are usually extremely descriptive. And when they're keyed to obvious non-white themes it's a warning signal to look deeper. Here's another example. The U.S. Pacific Fleet commander who allowed himself to be surprised at Pearl Harbor, Admiral Husband E. Kimmel, was nicknamed "Mustapha" as a midshipmen at the United States Naval Academy at Annapolis. Other "Mustaphas" in Egypt and Syria allowed this to happen to themselves in 1967.

    The academy and officer training schools (used?) to take official advantage of that close quarters peer knowledge through an anonymous peer rating mechanism. I knew this as "Top Five/Bottom Five" and it meant what it said. Officer candidates rated their platoon fellows on leadership in rank order from Top One to Bottom x. People who accumulated too many "Bottom Five" rankings were automatically scheduled for periodic official leadership review boards for enquiry into whether they should be dismissed without commission. The presumption of such boards used to be such individuals should be dismissed unless they could prove they were worthy of commission. Very, very few survived such review boards.

    Judeo-Marxist Academics like the military scribbler Weigley and the Jew military 'sociologist' Moscowitz are generally extremely hostile to processes like peer rating and also to troop election of officers at regimental level and below. The admixture of females has added feminist hostility to the opposition to such processes. The long-term result is a corps of military leaders who possess less and less confidence where it really counts. That's among their soldiers. This has gone so far that the average U.S. ground combat unit is unusable for its designed purpose.

    After long military experience and study the wisdom of both peer ratings and also electing regimental officers in militia and citizen-soldier units seems more and more profound to me. I think the only safeguard needed is a veto power for general officers to remove obvious misfits. You can conduct all the bureaucratic schooling processes you want. But if an officer does not possess the confidence of his troops they will not follow him in combat, obey his orders or stay the course in difficult times. Consequently years of academic training simply go to waste. Electing first and schooling second is probably the best way.

    P.S. The leadership qualities required from military leaders and from political leaders are not identical. Some individuals combine these two attribute sets. Hitler did not combine these qualities, at least at the lower infantry unit level. This is proven by the fact he entered the Bavarian Army as a private and emerged after four years of war as a corporal. Despite this many fellow war veterans from his former battalion willingly followed him as a political leader, including his former battalion sergeant-major and some officers.

    Nineteenth Century America managed to select many men for high office who did combine both leadership sets in fairly large numbers. This more than anything explains the rapid conquest of the continent. It was not 'luck'. The old American Republic (long since vanished) actually conformed very closely in practice to the ideals of the old Roman Republic in both military process and results. The Roman Republic constitutionally required that political leaders prove themselves as leaders in war. This was an ideal for early Americans but not a definite legal requirement. Had the Founding Fathers mandated this in the Constitution our history would have turned out very differently. Certainly Canada, Mexico and Cuba would not exist as independent states. Whether this would have prevented subsequent miscegenation or the Civil War is another question.

    And results (output) are the real measure of military efficiency (or any other efficiency). The military stature and efficiency of a state is not measured by the numbers of troops raised or the percentage of the budget applied to 'military' appropriations; i.e. inputs. The Neo-con pseudo-patriots of the Judeo-Republican Party (non-veterans to a womandman) do think in these Communist terms of inputs. If this measurement were valid then Italy would be one of the military success stories of the 20th Century rather than one of the premier failures. When judged by this standard of results 19th Century America was a resounding success as a military state. Twentieth Century America was a military failure to the point that political loss of territory is now occuring in the Southwest.

    P.P.S. Note to the former student of Russell F. Weigley who wrote in to defend him.

    In my 1984 edition of Weigley's "History of the United States Army" he devotes about 40 pages to the War of 1812. He dedicates nearly all of this to harping on the relatively small Congressional size authorization and even lower actual personnel fill (about 20,000) of the "Regular Army". In this section Weigley glosses over the militia contribution in the sentence "this number was exclusive of those men from the volunteer and common militias who served for short periods against British raids and invasions in their own districts and who may have numbered in the hundreds of thousands."

    Then Weigley reverts back to beating to death obscurities like poor Regular Army horse recruitment and rotten contractor commissary stores. The obscure "Battle of Lundy's Lane" (actually a minor skirmish around Niagara) receives an extensive autopsy. The Battles of Put-in Bay, New Orleans and General Harrison's campaign to reconquer the Northwest are ignored. These large-scale decisive events were commanded by regular officers leading Weigley's ignored militia.

    And New Orleans was decisive despite being fought after 'peace' was signed. Anyone who thinks the extermination of Britain's best veteran regiments at the hands of frontier militia didn't exercise a subsequent deterrent effect on British decision-making doesn't understand how governments arrive at war and peace decisions. The British decision to negotiate over "Fifty-four Forty or Fight!" in the 1840s was undoubtedly influenced by that memory.

    If Weigley had ever marched even once 20 miles with a 100 pound pack in 100 degree heat he would have understood something. Even 100,000 perfectly trained regulars alone would have resulted in American defeat. In the early 19th Century transport proceeded by foot, by horse or by sea. Since the British had overall naval superiority moving troops by sea convoy was not possible. This left marching on land. The factors of force/space/time applied to North America dictated that the early Republic had to rely on 'militia'. This was especially true when fighting an enemy possessing command of the sea and the choice of where and when to strike with large amphibious raiding parties. There was no possibility of a timely counter-concentration of a central reserve at the tactical level, especially on defense. This comes back to Nathan Bedford Forrest's "he who gets theah fustest with mostest." Overall numbers are irrelevant in such conditions unless you create a 'nation in arms' as was done by the Militia Act of 1792.

    Like I said, Weigley's book is worthless garbage that should be collected up and pulped
                  



    -----Original Message-----
    From: New Order <neworder@execpc.com>
    To: bikpatel@aol.com
    Sent: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:33:02 -0600
    Subject: Re: Eisenhower had Jewish blood

    We are not impressed.  The evidence you have presented
    would not make a very good case in eugenics court. 

    College high-jinks remarks are not at all convincing.   
    You must have something considerably more substantial. 

    Also, having a Jew find a shabbos goy does not make such
    a prot�g� a Jew.  Remember Lord Beaconfield's Coningsby?
    One need not be a Jew to be a swine (if we may be allowed
    to disparage swine in this disrespectful manner).

    Sincerely,

    DJ
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 2:01 PM
    Subject: Eisenhower had Jewish blood





    Eisenhower had Jewish blood

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule


    http://www.rense.com/general19/gmk.htm

    One Million German POWs
    Killed After WWII By US & France
    Environment News Service
    1-25-2

    Excerpt from - OTHER LOSSES
    By James Bacque
    Stoddart Publishing
    Toronto, Canada
    ISBN 0-7737-2269-6    
     
    June, 1945 US POW camp in Germany
     
    "Starting in April 1945, the United States Army and the French Army
    casually annihilated one million [German] men, most of them in
    American camps . . . Eisenhower's hatred, passed through the lens of
    a compliant military bureaucracy, produced the horror of death camps
    unequalled by anything in American history . . . an enormous war
    crime."
     
    --Col. Ernest F. Fisher, PhD Lt.
    101 st Airborne Division, Senior Historian, United States Army
       
    Comment
     
    From Stephen R.
    1-29-2
     
    I heard this kind of story repeatedly in the late 1940's. Some were
    much worse as to numbers involved. I was super patriotic, and told a
    kid his relative was a liar.
     
    One Sunday, he came to my house and got me, and I heard a drunken
    discourse from his mothers' scarey boyfriend who had been a GI guard.
    He became hysterical talking about burying 100's per day. I have no
    doubt this was true. He was with some kind of roving death squad.
    They arrived at the German POW camps late in 1945, took selected
    prisoners from shelters to open fields in mid-Winter. And watched
    them in shifts until they were dead.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule
    Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:03:23 -0500
    From: dkuehne@erols.com
    Subject: Eisenhower's Holocaust: I DON'T like IKE!

     From: "Bob Jones"<dragonslayer@lvcm.com>
    http://www.nidlink.com/~aryanvic/ikekike.html

    IKE, THE KIKE! Eisenhower's Holocaust!

    "God, I hate the Germans..." --Dwight David Eisenhower
    in a letter to his wife in September, 1944.

         First, I want you to picture something in your
    mind. You are a German soldier who survived through the
    battles of World II. You were not really politically
    involved, and your parents were also indifferent to
    politics, but suddenly your education was interrupted
    and you were drafted into the German army and told
    where to fight. Now, in the Spring of 1945, you see
    that your country has been demolished by the Allies,
    your cities lie in ruins, and half of your family has
    been killed or is missing. Now, your unit is being
    surrounded, and it is finally time to surrender. The
    fact is, there is no other choice.

         It has been a long, cold winter. The German army
    rations have not been all that good, but you managed to
    survive. Spring came late that year, with weeks of cold
    rainy weather in demolished Europe. Your boots are
    tattered, your uniform is falling apart, and the stress
    of surrender and the confusion that lies ahead for you
    has your guts being torn out. Now, it is over, you must
    surrender or be shot. This is war and the real world.

         You are taken as a German Prisoner of War into
    American hands. The Americans had 200 such Prisoner of
    War camps scattered across Germany. You are marched to
    a compound surrounded with barbed wire fences as far as
    the eye can see. Thousands upon thousands of your
    fellow German soldiers are already in this make-shift
    corral. You see no evidence of a latrine and after
    three hours of marching through the mud of the spring
    rain, the comfort of a latrine is upper-most in your
    mind. You are driven through the heavily guarded gate
    and find yourself free to move about, and you begin the
    futile search for the latrine. Finally, you ask for
    directions, and are informed that no such luxury
    exists. No more time. You find a place and squat. First
    you were exhausted, then hungry, then fearful, and
    now--dirty. Hundreds more German prisoners are behind
    you, pushing you on, jamming you together and every one
    of them searching for the latrine as soon as they could
    do so. Now, late in the day, there is no space to even
    squat, much less sit down to rest your weary legs. None
    of the prisoners, you quickly learn, have had any food
    that day, in fact there was no food while in the
    American hands that any surviving prisoner can testify
    to. No one has eaten any food for weeks, and they are
    slowly starving and dying.

         But, they can't do this to us! There are the
    Geneva Convention rules for the treatment of Prisoners
    of War. There must be some mistake! Hope continues
    through the night, with no shelter from the cold,
    biting rain. Your uniform is sopping wet, and formerly
    brave soldiers are weeping all around you, as buddy
    after buddy dies from the lack of food, water, sleep
    and shelter from the weather. After weeks of this, your
    own hope bleeds off into dispair, and finally you
    actually begin to envy those who, having surrendered
    first manhood and then dignity, now also surrender life
    itself. More hopeless weeks go by. Finally, the last
    thing you remember is falling, unable to get up, and
    lying face down in the mud mixed with the excrement of
    those who have gone before.

         Your body will be picked up long after it is cold,
    and taken to a special tent where your clothing is
    stripped off. So that you will be quickly forgotten,
    and never again identified, your dog-tag is snipped in
    half and your body along with those of your fellow
    soldiers are covered with chemicals for rapid
    decomposition and buried. You were not one of the
    exceptions, for more than one million, seven hundred
    thousand German Prisoners of War died from a deliberate
    policy of extermination by starvation, exposure, and
    disease -under direct orders of General Dwight David
    Eisenhower.

         One month before the end of World War 11, General
    Eisenhower issued special orders concerning the
    treatment of German Prisoners and specific in the
    language of those orders was this statement, "Prison
    enclosures are to provide no shelter or other
    comforts." Eisenhower biographer Stephen Ambrose, who
    was given access to the Eisenhower personal letters,
    states that he proposed to exterminate the entire
    German General Staff, thousands of people, after the
    war. Eisenhower, in his personal letters, did not
    merely hate the Nazi Regime, and the few who imposed
    its will down from the top, but that he hated the
    German people as a race. It was his personal intent to
    destroy as many of them as he could, and one way was to
    wipe out as many prisoners of war as possible. Of
    course, that was illegal under International law, so he
    issued an order on March 10, 1945 and verified by his
    initials on a cable of that date, that German Prisoners
    of War be redesignated as "Disarmed Enemy Forces"
    called in these reports as DEF. He ordered that these
    Germans did not fall under the Geneva Rules, and were
    not to be fed or given any water or medical attention.
    The Swiss Red Cross was not to inspect the camps, for
    under the DEF classification, they had no such
    authority or jurisdiction.

         Months after the war was officially over,
    Eisenhower's special German DEF camps were still in
    operation forcing the men into confinement, but denying
    that they were prisoners. As soon as the war was over,
    General George Patton simply turned his prisoners loose
    to fend for themselves and find their way home as best
    they could. Eisenhower was furious, and issued a
    specific order to Patton, to turn these men over to the
    DEF camps. Knowing Patton as we do from history, we
    know that these orders were largely ignored, and it may
    well be that Patton's untimely and curious death may
    have been a result of what he knew about these wretched
    Eisenhower DEF camps.

         The book, OTHER LOSSES, found its way a few months
    ago into the hands of a Canadian news reporter, Peter
    Worthington, of the OTTAWA SUN. He did his own research
    through contacts he had in Canada, and reported in his
    column on September 12,1989 the following, in part:

         "...it is hard to escape the conclusion that
    Dwight Eisenhower was a war criminal of epic
    proportions. His (DEF) policy killed more Germans in
    peace than were killed in the European Theatre."

         "For years we have blamed the 1.7 million missing
    German POW's on the Russians. Until now, no one dug too
    deeply ... Witnesses and survivors have been
    interviewed by the author; one Allied officer compared
    the American camps to Buchenwald."

         It is known, and will be documented in my upcoming
    book in newsprint format, that the Allies had
    sufficient stockpiles of food and medicine to care for
    these German soldiers. This was deliberately and
    intentionally denied them. Many men died of gangrene
    from frostbite due to deliberate exposure. Local German
    people who offered these men food, were denied. General
    Patton's Third Army was the only command in the
    European Theatre to release significant numbers of
    Germans. Others, such as Omar Bradley and General
    J.C.H. Lee, Commander of Com Z, tried, and ordered the
    release of prisoners within a week of the war's end.
    However, a SHAEF Order, signed by Eisenhower,
    countermanded them on May 15th.

         Does that make you angry? What will it take to get
    the average apathetic American involved in saving his
    country from such traitors at the top? Thirty years
    ago, amid the high popularity of Eisenhower, a book was
    written setting out the political and moral philosophy;
    of Dwight David Eisenhower called, THE POLITICIAN, by
    Robert Welch.

         This year is the 107th Anniversary of Eisenhower's
    birth in Denison, Texas on October 14, 1890, the son of
    Jacob David Eisenhower and his wife Ida. Everyone is
    all excited about the celebration of this landmark in
    the history of "this American patriot." Senator Robert
    Dole, in honor of the Commander of the American Death
    Camps, proposed that Washington's Dulles Airport be
    renamed the Eisenhower Airport!

         The UNITED STATES MINT in Philadelphia, PA is
    actually issuing a special Eisenhower Centennial Silver
    Dollar for only $25 each. They will only mint 4 million
    of these collector's items, and veteran's magazines are
    promoting these coins under the slogan, "Remember the
    Man ... Remember the Times.." Pardon me if I
    regurgitate!

         There will be some veterans who will not be buying
    these coins. Two will be Col. James Mason and Col.
    Charles Beasley who were in the U.S. Army Medical Corps
    who published a paper on the Eisenhower Death Camps in
    1950. They stated in part:

         "Huddled close together for warmth, behind the
    barbed wire was a most awesome sight-- nearly 100,000
    haggard, apathetic, dirty, gaunt, blank-staring men
    clad in dirty gray uniforms, and standing ankle deep in
    mud .... water was a major problem, yet only 200 yards
    away the River Rhine was running bankfull."

         Another Veteran, who will not be buying any of the
    Eisenhower Silver Dollars is Martin Brech of Mahopac,
    New York, a semi-retired professor of philosophy at
    Mercy College in Dobbs Ferry, NY. In 1945, Brech was an
    18 year old Private First Class in Company C of the
    14th Infantry, assigned as a guard and interpreter at
    the Eisenhower Death Camp at Andernach, along the Rhine
    River. He stated for SPOTLIGHT, February 12, 1990:

         "My protests (regarding treatment of the German
    DEF'S) were met with hostility or indifference, and
    when I threw our ample rations to them over the barbed
    wire. I was threatened, making it clear that it was our
    deliberate policy not to adequately feed them."

         "When they caught me throwing C- Rations over the
    fence, they threatened me with imprisonment. One
    Captain told me that he would shoot me if he saw me
    again tossing food to the Germans .... Some of the men
    were really only boys 13 years of age .... Some of the
    prisoners were old men drafted by Hitler in his last
    ditch stand .... I understand that average weight of
    the prisoners at Andernach was 90 pounds ... I have
    received threats ... Nevertheless, this ... has
    liberated me, for I may now be heard when I relate the
    horrible atrocity I witnessed as a prison guard for one
    of 'Ike's death camps' along the Rhine."

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule

         Betty Lou Smith Hanson

         Note: Remember the photo of Ike's West Point
    yearbook picture when he was dubbed "IKE, THE TERRIBLE
    SWEDISH JEW"? By the way, he was next, or nearly so, to
    the last in his class. This article was first printed
    in 1990, but we thought it was meaningfull to reprint
    it now.

         (Note: During Cadet Eisenhower's time at West
    Point Academy, Eisenhower was summoned to the office of
    the headmaster and was asked some pointed questions. At
    the time, it was routine procedure to test a cadet's
    blood to insure White racial integrety.

         Apparently there was a question of Eisenhower's
    racial lineage and this was brought to Eisenhower's
    attention by the headmaster. When asked if he was part
    Oriental, Eisenhower replied in the negative. After
    some discussion, Eisenhower admitted having some Jewish
    background. The headmaster then reportedly said,
    "That's where you get your Oriental blood?". Although
    he was allowed to remain at the academy, word got
    around since this was a time in history when non-Whites
    were not allowed into the academy.

         Later, in Eisenhower's West Point Military Academy
    graduating class yearbook, published in 1915,
    Eisenhower is identified as a "terrible Swedish Jew."

         Wherever Eisenhower went during his military
    career, Eisenhower's Jewish background and secondary
    manifesting behavior was a concern to his fellow
    officers.

         During World War II when Col. Eisenhower was
    working for Gen. Douglas McArthur in the South Pacific,
    McArthur protested to his superiors in Washington (DC)
    that Eisenhower was incompetent and that he did not
    want Eisenhower on his staff.

         In 1943, Washington not only transferred Col.
    Eisenhower to Europe but promoted him over more than 30
    more experienced senior officers to five star general
    and placed him in charge of all the US forces in
    Europe. Thus it comes as no surprise that General
    George Patton, a real Aryan warrior, hated Eisenhower.)
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule
    http://www.scripturesforamerica.org/html2/jm0053.htm
    WAR CRIMES - U.S.A.  (The Final Truth About WW II)

    A Book Review on OTHER LOSSES

    by Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr, AUS Ret.

    ". . . there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed: and hid that shall not be made known." - Matthew 10:26

    The Final Truth About World War II

    Is America finally about to be thrown a scrap or two of historical truth? If so, have the Soviet relations of recent months, which has caused its leaders to admit to the murder of millions of their own people, allowed a few rays of truth to filter down and penetrate the Iron Curtain which has been erected over World War II, and which has kept vital facts from our people?

    Something out of the ordinary seems to be going on within America's ruling circles. Are we finally to be told the truth about World War II?

    Recently a book was written by an eminent Canadian author, James Bacque, of Toronto. It is titled OTHER LOSSES and deserves the widest possible distribution in the United States, especially among our veterans who fought World War II. Although Mr. Bacque's book does not picture America and her allies in a favorable light, it has had an amazing reception in Canada, although the people of the United States, for the most part have been kept in the dark about one of the most heinous episodes of World War II, which revolves around the Supreme Commander of the Allies in Europe, Gen. Dwight David Eisenhower, who was known during his days at West Point as that "terrible Swedish Jew."

    I have my own opinions of Dwight David Eisenhower, opinions formed during the early days of World War II, from information I received from officers who knew "Ike" before he became Supreme Commander.

    During the days before World War II, "Ike," as he was affectionately called, was noted as a ''ladies man, and the best damned bridge player on the Post." (Quotation not mine.) When anyone would mention Ike as a troop commander, it was met with hilarious, profane skepticism. Then too, my opinions of Ike were formed by the attitude of my Commanding General, Gen. George Patton, who looked on Eisenhower as a "whimp," not worthy of his rank.

    As many of you will remember, Ike was promoted to Supreme Commander in Europe. From Lieutenant Colonel, in early 1941, Eisenhower was promoted to full Colonel in March 1941, to Brigadier General (temporary) in September. In February 1942, after he became a favorite of Gen. George Marshall during the Louisiana Maneuvers, he was appointed Assistant Chief of the War Plans Division. About this time, Ike became acquainted with the daughter of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and she introduced her boy friend to "pappa." Evidently F.D.R. recognized in this young officer, a man who would agree with his plans and who would do anything to get promoted. This began a rapid spiral of promotions which by-passed many officers who outranked him and who were much more qualified for the posts he occupied. He became Chief of Operations Division, War Department General Staff (March, 1942), to Commanding General of the European Theater of Operations in June 1942, to Allied Commander in Chief, for the invasion of North Africa (November, 1942), Sicily, (May 1943), Italy (September, 1943) and finally to his ultimate designation by President F.D.R. as Supreme Commander, Allied Expeditionary Force for the invasion of Europe.

    It was Eisenhower's advise to F.D.R. and Churchill, which caused the war to drag on for two extra years, resulting in millions of deaths on both sides, and hundreds of billions of dollars of profit for Eisenhower's racial brethren, the International bankers, who financed both sides.

    In early 1943, General Patton and the British Commander, Gen. Montgomery, presented a plan to Churchill and F.D.R. which called for the invasion of Europe through the "soft underbelly of Europe." This would have liberated all the eastern European countries from Communist control and would have ended the war in 1943.

    But Eisenhower's hatred of the Germans, which was openly shown many times during those terrible days of the war, demanded that as many Germans as possible be made to suffer for their part in the war.

    It might be well to state here, that as early as 1902, International Jewry had a plan for the destruction of Christianity in Europe.

    This called for the destruction, first of Czarist Russia, which took place in 1917, and then for the destruction of Germany. A war chest of some $2-billion was set aside for this purpose, long before a man named Adolf Hitler came on the scene. When Churchill and F.D.R. listened to the advice of Stalin, instead of their two best military leaders, it gave Stalin two years to establish control over all of Eastern Europe, which is now known as the Warsaw Pact Nations.

    We can see the further treason in Eisenhower's actions, when in 1945, as Patton's armored forces swept into Germany, they were held back from entering Berlin, and were even ordered to withdraw to the Western borders of Germany, until Soviet troops could enter Germany.

    Any military commander "worth their salt," knows that Patton could have ended the war on the Eastern border of Germany and that country would have never been divided. Patton by this time was beginning to realize that a conspiracy existed among the top war leaders, which were keeping him from the victory he so richly deserved. It was a traumatic lesson which was to be later repeated with General Douglas MacArthur in Korea, when he was not allowed to attack enemy positions north of the Yalu River.

    The One Worlder's in Washington, D.C., and London had other plans and aided Stalin in his rape of Eastern Europe and Germany.

    It was the "terrible Swedish Jew" Eisenhower, whose open hatred of everything German, caused him to promote Operation Keelhaul, at the end of the war, where thousands of anti-Communist fighters, who had surrendered to American forces, were forced at bayonet point, back to the tender mercies of the Communists. Thousands of them were murdered outright, or disappeared into the Gulags of Russia.

    Eisenhower returned to the States, made a hero by the controlled prostitute press of America, and his popularity from a populace he had betrayed, was such that he became the 34th President of the United States in 1953.

    Eisenhower was quoted at lie war's end as saying: ''I hate war as only a soldier who has lived through it can only as one who has seen it's brutality, it's futility, it's Stupidity" But he did not hate it as much as he hated Germans, and he took a terrible Jewish revenge on over a million surrendered German soldiers and civilians when the war ended. Praised by the media and the ''kept'' historians, this man was directly responsible for one of the most reprehensible acts in the history of civilized warfare. One which should put him in the same class with Atilla the Hun and other barbarians.

    The peace which was inflicted on a completely defeated Germany in 1945, was called the Morgenthau Plan. It was promoted by Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, a Jew, who later stated that most of the ideas for this plan had come from Eisenhower.

    Now, after a tremendous research of over twenty years, the truth about this Jew Commander of America's forces, who became the 34th President of the United States, can be known.

    In 1945, during the post-World War II period, American foreign policy was largely in the hands of a small group of very powerful Zionists based in Washington, D.C. This secret, invisible government, which has controlled America for over fifty years, was headed then by Sen. Herbert Lehman; Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, and Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau. They drew up the "blueprint" for a plan, which the enthusiastic Eisenhower carried out in Europe, which was the most monstrous policy of hate and vengeance known in the annals of civilized history.

    This policy is still in operation today, fifty years later, where media pundits, twisting, exaggerating, and even manufacturing historical claims, have hounded, harassed, and had arrested 70 and 80-year old European war veterans for alleged ''war crimes,'' which were supposed to have taken place over fifty years ago.

    The following article, entitled THE EISENHOWER DEATH CAMPS, was taken from the January 1990 issue of INSTAURATION, a scholarly American monthly. Every American veteran who served in World War II should know these facts. They are entitled to know how we were lied to and inveigled into a war for the benefits of the Internationalists. Every American Legion and Veteran's of foreign War Post in this country, should have this article read to its them bets, for you see, the same treason was carried out in Korea and then later in Vietnam. It is we, the veteran's of America, who have the right to know the truth, about the traitors who were responsible for the murder of our buddies, and the crippling of hundreds of thousands more, and who are even now laying the groundwork to get your sons and daughters involved in World War Ill.

    The National Archives in Washington, (D.C.) contains an official document called the Weekly Prisoner of War and Disarmed Enemy Forces Report for the week ending Sept. 8, 1945. It shows that 1,056,482 German prisoners were then being held by the U.S. Army in the European theater, of whom 692,895 were still classified as POWs (Prisoners of War) and the other 363,587 as DEFs (Disarmed Enemy Forces.)

    This latter designation was illegal under international law and completely contrary to the Geneva Convention, to which both the United States and Germany were signatories. A German soldier designated DEF had no right to any food, shelter, or water in fact, to anything. Quite often he did not receive even the basic necessities of life and died within days.

    In the first week of September 1945, 13,051 of the 363,587 Germans died and were listed cryptically as "other losses." This was the equivalent of a death rate of 3.6% per week. At such a rate, all the remaining 350,536 DEFs would have been dead within 28 weeks before the end of the approaching winter.

    The civilian death rate immediately outside the American camps in Germany was about 2% per year, or nearly 100 times lower, despite the greater proportion of older people. Since adequate supplies were readily available to the American troops at all times, this killing seems to have been deliberate.

    As for the 692,895 German soldiers still falsely listed as POWs, the last of them had actually been transferred from POW to DEF status a month earlier on August 4, by order of General Eisenhower. Their death rate quickly quadrupled within weeks, from .2% to .8% per week. Assuming the latter rate for the week ending September 8, about 5,543 of the so-called POWs listed in the report as being alive and in American hands had died that week - all would have died within just over two years.. (The reason this death rate was lower than 3.6% weekly for the longer-term DEFs was simply that the barbaric treatment of the DEFs was cumulative, and that some of the American troops refused to go along with this barbaric treatment.) I recall the winter of 1945, when I was on occupation duty in Japan. A similar order came from our local U.S. military commander who was known for his hatred of all Japanese. It did not come from MacArthur's headquarters in Tokyo. We were not allowed to give food of any kind to Japanese civilians, although many of them were on the verge of starvation. I was commanding a detachment of 28 men, which were guarding a Japanese Quarter Master dump at the little town of Niski'ya'hama, about eighty miles south of Osaka. Food in this storehouse was literally spoiling, yet we were not allowed to share it with the Japanese people. For Christmas rations that year, my detachment received eight sheep carcasses and 28 turkeys, with no refrigeration for storage. Rather than see this food go to waste, I shared it with the starving population, and when word leaked out, I came very close to being court marshaled. It was only the intervention of a high ranking officer from MacArthur's Headquarters which saved me.

    The same thing happened over and over again in Germany, and American officers and servicemen were court marshaled, on Eisenhower's orders, for sharing their rations with the starving Germans. If you were a young man, with several small children at home, you know how these enemy children played on the minds of decent Americans who knew what their government was doing was wrong. Enemy children have never been enemies, to big hearted Americans.

    But with a man of unbounded hatred for the Germans, his order of August 4th, made it impossible for there to be such a thing as a bona fide German POW in American hands on European soil.

    Instead, there were vast concentrations of men (including some women and children) starving to death in open, muddy, disease-ridden fields.

    In November 1945, Eisenhower returned to Washington. A month later, a slight relaxation went into effect. Men of conscience such as General George Patton, had no qualms about killing German soldiers in combat, but he drew a line at the deliberate policy of murder which was advocated by Eisenhower. I firmly believe this was one of the reasons he met his untimely death The truth which is now coming out of old records, show that "war crimes" was by no means a German monopoly, and the "good war," the Jewish media and historians called it in the United States, was as evil as any conflict in world history.

    Bacque's careful calculations forced hty o conclude:

    Eisenhower had deplored the German's useless defense of the Reich in the last months of the war because of the waste of life. At least ten times as many Germans - undoubtedly 800,000, almost certainly 900,000, and quite possibly a million died in the French and American camps as were killed in all the combat on the Western front in northwest Europe from America's entry into the war in December 1941, through April 1945."

    Bacque was ably assisted in his research by Col. Ernest F. Fisher, a senior historian for the U.S. Army, as well as by other highly placed members of the American military. One of them, Co!. Philip S. Lauben, Chief of the German Affairs branch of SHAEF (Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force), stated that, in late 1945, "the Vosges (northeast France) was just one big death camp (for Germans)."

    In spite of everything which has been written about Eisenhower which makes him out to be a hero, there seems little question that Dwight Eisenhower meets all the qualifications of a certified war criminal, even if Bacque's figures are off a bit. (If Germany had been the winner, there is little doubt he would have been tried and found guilty of the most heinous crimes against mankind.)

    Many veterans will get upset with this appraisal of a man they looked on as a "bona fide" American hero. But the proof for these accusations can be found in what happened to those Germans who were fortunate enough to surrender to the British and the Canadians some two million of them. The evidence shows that "almost all continued in fair health and many were quickly released and sent home or transferred to the French, to help in the post-war work of reconstruction.

    Bacque specifically commends General Patton for behavior towards his POWs it a civilized manner. His Third Army freed vast numbers of German captives during May 1945, to the dismay, no doubt, of the Zionists who controlled Washington

    Both General Omar Bradley and J. C. H. Lee, Communications Zone (ComZ) Europe, ordered the release of prisoners within a week of the war's end. This SHAEF order was countermanded by Eisenhower on May IS, 1945.

    While German soldiers from the British and Canadian zones were quickly regaining manr strength and were helping rebuild Europe, Germans taken by the Americans were dying by the hundreds of thousands - emaciated figures in diarrhea smeared clothing, huddling pitifully in watery holes with perhaps a scrap of cardboard over their heads and a rotten potato for supper. At times many of them were reduced to drinking urine and eating grass.

    Did all this happen because of one supremely unprincipled and influential man named Eisenhower? Or was Ike in turn influenced by a small circle around him or by his superiors in Washington? Historians will be probing this question for decades to come.

    Here are the principle dates by which this infamy will live:

    1944: Eisenhower told the British ambassador to Washington that the 3,500 officers of the German General staff should be ''exterminated.'' He also favored the liquidation of perhaps 100,000 prominent Germans. Soon after, he wrote to his wife, Mamie: "God, I hate Germans! Why? Because the German is a beast!" Eisenhower said he was ashamed to bear a German name.

    August 1944: The North American wheat surplus was create greater than at any time in history, nearly one billion bushels. The U.S. corn surplus and potato crop also reached a new high.

    March 10, 1944: A message sent from Eisenhower to the Combined Chiefs of Staff (CCS) of Britain and the U.S. recommended the creation of an entirely new class of prisoners, Disarmed Enemy Forces or DEFs. At a press conference in Paris, this same day, Ike said: "If the Germans were reasoning like normal beings, they would realize the whole history of the United States and Great Britain is to be generous towards a defeated enemy. We observe all the laws of the Geneva Convention.''

    March 19, 1945: Eisenhower's special assistant, General Everett Hughes, visited the American supply depots at Naples and Marseille. In both places, he writes, there are ''more stocks than we can ever use. (They) stretch as far as eye can see.''

    Spring 1945: The International Red Cross had over 100,000 tons of food stockpiled in Switzerland. At one point, it sent two trainloads into the American Zone of Germany, but the food was sent back. The Morgenthau Plan for a ''Carthaginian Peace'' in Germany, to use the words of Military Governor Lucius Clay, is implemented through the directive JCS (Joint Chiefs of Staff) 1067, which specifies to Eisenhower the policy he must adopt towards every institution in Germany. The directive is largely the work of three of Henry Morgenthau's underlings in the Treasury Department Harry Dexter White, Frank Coe, and Harry Glasser. White and Glasser were both Jews and all three were Communist ''fellow travelers.''

    April 11, 1945: On the eve of his death, FDR told Morgenthau in Warm Springs, GA: "Henry, I am with you l00%" When Truman took over, he continued Morgenthau's "Carthaginian Policy" towards conquered Germany.

    April 17, 1945: The Americans opened their enormous Rheinberg Camp, six miles in circumference, with no food or shelter whatsoever. As in the other big "Rhine meadow" camps, opened in mid-April, there was initially no latrines and no water. In some camps, the men were so crowded they could not lie down. Meanwhile, at Camp Kripp, near Remagen, the half-American Charles von Luttichau determines that his German comrades are receiving about 5% as much food as their captors." Complaining to the camp commander, HE SAID: ''Forget the Geneva Convention. You don't have any rights."

    Late April 1945: Heinz Janssen, a survivor of the Rheinberg camp, described conditions as they were at the time. "Amputees slithered like amphibians through the mud , soaking and freezing. Naked to the skies day after day and night after flight, they lay desperate in the sand of Rheinberg or sleep exhaustedly into eternity ill their collapsing holes.''

    April 26, 1945: The Combined Chiefs of Staff sent a message to Eisenhower, urging him not to take any more German prisoners after VE Day. He ignored it. The CCS approved of Ike's proposed DEF status, but only for certain types of German prisoners. The British refused to go against the Geneva Convention. The CCS orders the illegal DEF status to be kept strictly secret. By this date, Eisenhower's Quartermaster General of ASHAEF, Gen. Robert Littlejohn, has already twice reduced the rations to German prisoners. A message to Gen. George C. Marshall, signed by Ike, mandated: ''No shelter'' for German prisoners, despite an unusually cold and wet March and April.

    May 4, 1945: The first German POWs were transfer-red to DEF status. Mail to and from all German prisoners was banned for more than a year.

    May 8, 1945: Germany surrendered unconditionally. The U.S. State Department wasted no time dismissing Switzerland as the official Protecting Power for German prisoners, contravening the Geneva Convention. State also informed the International Red Cross that, with no Protecting Power to report to, there is no point in sending delegates to the camps. From this day forward, prisoners held by the U.S. Army had no access to any impartial observer. The British and Canadians also removed the Swiss protectors, but continued treating their POWs decently.

    May, 1945: The American Red Cross reported that more than 98% of Americans captured by the Germans will be coming home safely, thanks in part to the food parcels sent to them during the war, which were promptly delivered by the Germans.

    May 15, 1945: Eisenhower and Churchill talked about further reducing the rations for the German POWs. Churchill was informed that the POWs have been getting 2,000 calories per day (compared to 4,000 for American troops) and that 2,150 was regarded as an absolute minimum required for sedentary adults living under shelter. Eisenhower failed to tell Churchill that the U.S. Army was not even feeding many DEFs, and that they were feeding others, much less than 2,000 calories per day.

    Mid-May 1945: The Bingen camp, near Bad Kreuznach in the Rhineland, was now holding between 200,000 and 400,000 German POWs, with no shelter, food, water, or medicine. The death rate for prisoners in these U.S. camps were now about 30% per year, according to a U.S. medical survey.

    June 2, 1945: The European Theater Provost Marshal issued two reports. One, the last in a series of daily reports, logged 2,870,400 POWs on hand. The other, the first report in a weekly series, dated the same day, logged only 1,836,000. At one point in mid-June, the prisoner strength on the ration list is given as 1,421,559, despite the evidence of Gen. J.C.H. Lee and others that there were about 4 million. This bizarre bookkeeping persisted throughout 1945 in all branches of the occupying army. The apparent purpose was to obscure the death toll by means of an indecipherable mass of conflicting Statistics. (One of Bacque's greatest coups has been to decipher them.)

    Mid - June, 1945: British "Tommies" took over the huge Rheinberg camp from the Americans, saving many thousands of German lives. The final act of the ''Yanks" before the British took charge, was to bulldoze one section flat while the men were still living in their holes in the ground. Meanwhile, a team of doctors from the U.S. Army Medical Corps completed a survey of some of the smaller Rhineland camps, holding some 80,000 POWs (not DEFs). They found a death rate 80 times higher than anything they have known in their professional career.

    July, 1945: Eisenhower becomes military governor of the U.S. Zone in Germany. He continued to turn back all relief teams from Switzerland, the U.S. and elsewhere.

    July 10, 1945: A French Army unit under Gen. Rousseau, took over the Dietersheim camp (near Mainz) from the Americans. He found 32,000 men and women of all ages in a moribund (dying) State. Another French officer Capt .Julien, was taking command 17 days later and found a vast mire ''peopled with living skeletons, male and female, huddling under scraps of wet card board ." Horrified, Julien wrote: 'This is just like the photographs of Buchenwald and Dachau.

    July 20, 1945: Gen. Littlejohn received a memo stating, "These men, German POWs are authorized a maximum of 1,150 calories for the non-workers and 1,850 for workers.'' (Remember, it takes 2,000 calories of keep a sedentary adult alive.

    July 26, 1945: The International Red Cross proposed restoring mail service to German POWs. Fearing that the reality of the death camps might come to light, the U. S. War Department rejected the idea.

    August 4, 1945: Eisenhower ordered that all remaining German POWs be stripper of their rights, thus reducing them to DEF status.

    August 27, 1945: In a long memorandum, Gen. Littlejohn informed Eisenhower that 1,550,000 Germans who supposedly were getting U.S. ARMY RATIONS, WERE RECEIVING NOTHING. Ike turned a deaf ear to his report and the death rate continued to climb.

    August 30, 1945: Max Huber, head of the International Red Cross, wrote a stinging letter to the U.S. State Department about American interference in efforts to save starving Germans. Some months later, an evasive response, signed ''Eisenhower,'' arrived in Washington, falsely claiming that giving Red Cross food to enemy personnel was forbidden. Thousands of train cars loaded with decaying food were sent back to Geneva arid to sources in Paris and Brussels. Huber apologized for tying up the French rail system because of the food which was being returned by the Americans.

    By this time, more than 2-million German men had been discharged into American custody, including thousands of priests, ministers, doctors, and professors. Not one single camp commander or guard was questioned by the Allied press corps and the controlled media of the U.S. concerning conditions in these hell holes.

    It might be well, to stop right here and ask this question: ''Is anyone who reads this horrifying account, so naive as to believe that the American people would have put up with these barbaric actions by its chief military men if they had known about it? Do you think that the politicians who were in the forefront of those who kept these facts from Americans would have lasted very long in office, if the truth had been known? Do you think that millions of Americans would show such concern for the Holocaust of the Jews, if they knew that it was Jewish hatred for their fellow kinsmen, that were killing over a million Germans? I sincerely doubt it! That's why these facts have been kept from the American people for almost fifty years.

    Late Summer, 1945: Jean-Pierre Pradervand, head of the International Red Cross delegations in France, told Henry W. Dunning, an American Red Cross official, that conditions in the French camps are worse, in many instances, than anything seen in the former Nazi camps. Pradervand showed Dunning pictures of the living skeletons. Dunning explained all this to the American Red Cross in Washington, which informed key government officials. Nevertheless, the cover-up continued. Pradervand also informed Charles De Gaulle that one-third of the prisoners handed over to France by the Americans will die soon without a radical change in treatment. De Gaulle showed no interest and the prisoners continued to die.

    September 27, 1945: Pradervand's pictures of German living skeletons were shown to Eisenhower in his office.

    September 30, 1945 - October 1: The French newspaper, Le Monde, ran a story which began: "As one speaks today of Dachau, in ten years people throughout the world will speak about camps such as Saint Paul d'Egiaux.''

    October 11,13, 14, 15, 20: The New York Times ran a cover-up report of the death camps by star newsman Drew Middleton. Interviewed by Bacque in 1988, Middleton admitted that he never actually visited any of the 50 U.S. camps located within 40 miles of his Frankfurt desk, but was only 'driven by,' as he was being debriefed by the military."

    December 1945: Eisenhower returned to the States and the U.S. Army allowed the first relief shipment to enter the American sector.

    1947 - 1950's: Nearly all the surviving records of the Rhineland death camps were destroyed. The West German government concluded that 1.7-million German soldiers were alive at the wars' end, and who were known to have been in fair health, and disappeared. The Western Allies pinned virtually all the blame on the Soviets.

    1950: The first German edition of ALLHERERTE KRIEGSVERBRECHEN is published. Never translated into English, the book gives eye-witness descriptions of the conditions which prevailed in the American camps.

    1960s - 1972: The West German Foreign Office, under Willy Brandt subsidized books denying the atrocities in American POW camps and the high death rate.

    1980: The International Committee of the Red Cross refuses to open its archives to James Bacque and other investigators into Allied atrocities. To this day, the ICRC has remained silent on the subject, despite the visits of Pradervand and other Red Cross delegates to many methhe camps.

    September 1989: James Bacque's book on the American death camps, "Other Losses," published by Stoddard, a Canadian Publishing House, was released, after being refused by more than 30 American publishers. Saturday night, one of Canada's most respected magazines. simultaneously published a summary of this book as its lead story and within days Canada was buzzing about Gen. Eisenhower's war crimes. Why is it that we have heard little or nothing of this in the United States?

    As American citizens, many of us who served in the American Armed Forces during World War II, and a great many of us who are of German heritage, should demand of our leaders in Washington, D.C. that the truth about this War be made known.

    With accurate information of what really happened, instead of Zionist propaganda, just possibly we might be able to avert World War III, which is now being planned by these same One Worlders.

    It is interesting to note, that it has been proven in recent years, that many of the pictures taken in Germany during WW II, purporting to be Jewish victims of ''racial extermination,'' were actually pictures of German civilians who had died under American war criminals.

    (Most of the information in this article came from the March 1990, CANADIAN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE. Their mut Wly intelligence newsletter is available from the above address)



    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule
    http://www.scrapbookpages.com/EasternGermany/Gotha/
    Gotha

    http://www.scrapbookpages.com/EasternGermany/Gotha/Gotha06.jpg
    City Hall & Market Square in Gotha

    The city of Gotha is mostly known to Americans, if at all, as the first headquarters of the American Army, set up by General Eisenhower in April 1945, and as the site of one of the Prisoner of War camps where captured German soldiers were treated in a barbaric fashion with total disregard to the rules of civilized warfare. Eisenhower mentioned Gotha in his book "Crusade in Europe," as the nearest city to the "horror camp" at Ohrdruf-Nord, the first concentration camp to be discovered by American soldiers in April 1945, but he failed to mention his own notorious POW camp located near Gotha.

    On March 10, 1945 as World War II was coming to an end, General Eisenhower signed an order creating the status of Disarmed Enemy Forces for the German Prisoners of War who would soon be surrendering to the Americans. This order was a violation of the Geneva Convention because it allowed Eisenhower to disregard the rules for the treatment of Prisoners of War. It allowed him to starve the German POWs, deny them the right to send and receive letters, receive Red Cross packages or packages from Germany civilians. All these rights were enjoyed by the prisoners in the Nazi POW camps and even in the notorious concentration camps. Eisenhower signed this order before he had even seen the horrors of the concentration camps, which so affected him.

    James Bacque wrote in his book Other Losses: "There were no tents in the Gotha DEF camp, only the usual barbed wire fences round a field soon churned to mud. On the first day, they received a small ration of food, which was then cut in half. In order to get it, they were forced to run a gauntlet. Hunched over, they ran between lines of guards who hit them with sticks as they scurried towards their food. On April 27, they were transferred to the U.S. camp at Heidesheim further west where there was no food at all for days, then very little."

    On May 8, 1945 the German army surrendered to General Eisenhower, who refused to shake hands with the German General, as is customary. The neutral country of Switzerland was removed as the Protecting Power for German prisoners, which violated the Geneva Convention. General Patton quickly released the prisoners who had surrendered to his Third Army, but General Eisenhower held his POWs until the end of 1946, forcing them to live on starvation rations. Red Cross packages sent to the POW camps were returned. The POW camps had no barracks or tents. The German prisoners were forced to dig holes in the ground for shelter, as the picture below shows. Even though the American army had plenty of tents, the prisoners lived for months in their holes. When it rained, the holes collapsed and the prisoners died.

    http://www.scrapbookpages.com/EasternGermany/Gotha/POWcamp.jpg
    German POWs had to dig holes for shelter

    After 1947 most of the records of the POW camps were destroyed by the U.S. government, according to James Bacque who wrote Other Losses. The Germans determined that 1,700,000 soldiers who were alive at the end of the war and had surrendered to the Allies, never returned home. All of the Allied countries denied responsibility, and the families were never told what had happened to their loved ones.

    Ironically, Gotha also holds a place in history as the birthplace of the Socialist Worker's Party of Germany in 1875. The very house, called the Haus am Tivoli, where August Bebel and others got together to form this new leftist political party, is at the intersection of Cosmartstrasse, but it is closed to tourists. A plaque was placed outside the house by the Communist East German government, commemorating this as the place where a "glorious moment in the history of the German working class" took place. Karl Marx wrote a scathing paper called "Critique of the Gotha Programme" in which he criticized the new party as a sell-out of the proletariat and the Communist party, which he had popularized in 1848 with his "Communist Manifesto." In 1890, the name of the party was changed to the Social Democratic Party, which is still one of the largest political parties in Germany today.

    It was the Social Democrats who declared a Republic in Germany on November 9, 1918, forced the Kaiser to abdicate, and then signed the Armistice which ended World War I. The Nazis referred to the Social Democrats as the "November Criminals" and called their actions the "Dolchstoss" (Stab in the Back). The claim that Germany had lost World War I on the battlefield was called "The Big Lie" by Hitler in his book, "Mein Kampf." The harsh peace treaty signed by the Social Democrats at Versailles insured that another war would soon follow.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule
    http://netjunk.com/users/library/ike.htm
    Eisenhower's Starvation Order
    James Bacque
    [Allied POW Camp] http://netjunk.com/users/library/camp.jpg

    Never had so many people been put in prison. The size of the Allied captures was unprecedented in all history. The Soviets took prisoner some 3.5 million Europeans, the Americans about 6.1 million, the British about 2.4 million, the Canadians about 300,000, the French around 200,000. Uncounted millions of Japanese entered American captivity in 1945, plus about 640,000 entering Soviet captivity. [Above: A U.S. Army soldier stands guard over thousands of German POWs at Sinzig-Remagen, spring 1945.]

    As soon as Germany surrendered on 8 May 1945, the American Military Governor, General Eisenhower, sent out an "urgent courier" throughout the huge area that he commanded, making it a crime punishable by death for German civilians to feed prisoners. It was even a death-penalty crime to gather food together in one place to take it to prisoners ... The order was sent in German to the provincial governments, ordering them to distribute it immediately to local governments. Copies of the orders were discovered recently in several villages near the Rhine ... The message [which Bacque reproduces] reads in part: "... under no circumstances may food supplies be assembled among the local inhabitants in order to deliver them to the prisoners of war. Those who violate this command and nevertheless try to circumvent this blockade to allow something to come to the prisoners place themselves in danger of being shot...."

    Eisenhower's order was also posted in English, German and Polish on the bulletin board of Military Government Headquarters in Bavaria, signed by the Chief of Staff of the Military Governor of Bavaria. Later it was posted in Polish in Straubing and Regensburg, where there were many Polish guard companies at nearby camps. One US Army officer who read the posted order in May 1945 has written that it was "the intention of Army command regarding the German POW camps in the US Zone from May 1945 through the end of 1947 to exterminate as many POWs as the traffic would bear without international scrutiny."

    ... The [American] army's policy was to starve [German] prisoners, according to several American soldiers who were there. Martin Brech, retired professor of philosophy at Mercy college in New York, who was a guard at Andernach in 1945, has said that he was told by an officer that "it is our policy that these men not be fed." The 50,000 to 60,000 men in Andernach were starving, living with no shelter in holes in the ground, trying to nourish themselves on grass. When Brech smuggled bread to them through the wire, he was ordered to stop by an officer. Later, Brech sneaked more food to them, was caught, and told by the same officer, "If you do that again, you'll be shot." Brech saw bodies go out of the camp "by the truckload" but he was never told how many there were, where they were buried, or how.

    ... The prisoner Paul Schmitt was shot in the American camp at Bretzenheim after coming close to the wire to see his wife and young son who were bringing him a basket of food. The French followed suit: Agnes Spira was shot by French guards at Dietersheim in July 1945 for taking food to prisoners. The memorial to her in nearby Buedesheim, written by one of her chidren, reads: "On the 31st of July 1945, my mother was suddenly and unexpectedly torn from me because of her good deed toward the imprisoned soldiers." The entry in the Catholic church register says simply: "A tragic demise, shot in Dietersheim on 31.07.1945. Buried on 03.08.1945." Martin Brech watched in amazement as one officer at Andernach stood on a hillside firing shots towards German women running away from him in the valley below.

    The prisoner Hans Scharf ... was watching as a German woman with her two children came towards an American guard in the camp at Bad Kreuznach, carrying a wine bottle. She asked the guard to give the bottle to her husband, who was just inside the wire. The guard upended the bottle into his own mouth, and when it was empty, threw it on the ground and killed the prisoner with five shots.

    Many prisoners and German civilians saw the American guards burn the food brought by civilian women. One former prisoner described it recently: "At first, the women from the nearby town brought food into the camp. The American soldiers took everything away from the women, threw it in a heap and poured gasoline [benzine] over it and burned it." Eisenhower himself ordered that the food be destroyed, according to the writer Karl Vogel, who was the German camp commander appointed by the Americans in Camp 8 at Garmisch-Partenkirchen. Although the prisoners were getting only 800 calories per day, the Americans were destroying food outside the camp gate.

    James Bacque, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950, pp. 41-45, 94-95. Crimes and Mercies can be purchased from The Institute for Historical Review, PO Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659. $18.95 postpaid (CA sales tax $1.31)
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule
    http://home.arcor.de/kriegsgefangene/usa/vae_victis.html
    http://home.arcor.de/kriegsgefangen/photos/rheinwiese.gif
    Vae Victis - Blow to the loser After the transport over the Atlantic, many prisoners where locked in "cages". It were extremely bad conditions there. In the book "Other losses" written by James Bacque he claimed, that Eisenhower was primarily responsible for the catastrophe in the cages. Eisenhower let the German soldiers starve despite sufficient reinforcements, just due to his feelings of personal revenge. General Eisenhower was in his own words on a "crusade in Europe". The Canadian Bacque estimates, that about 1 million soldiers died in US custody. The anthology by Bishop and Ambrose tries to refute the thesis of James Bacque. They doubt that there where 1 million casualties. How many men exactly died in the cages, fact is that the SHAEF had with 5 million prisoners a considerable problem at the end of the war. An objective report, of the 11 to 12 million German prisoners of war in 20 custody states, is a publication of the "scientific commission for the documentation of the destiny of the German prisoners of the second World War". With up to 16 employees and important scientists, that commission became 400.000 statements of men returned from captivity, 50.000 reports as well and own interviews, published in 22 volumes at more than 10.000 printed pages. After ten years work, when the study had been finished, the (socialist) Westgerman chancellor Herbert Frahm, better known under his pseudonym "Willy Brand", ordered that this report had to be closed and prohibited publishing. He wanted to avoid a public discussion in Germany or even worst in the foreign countries. In his opinion people could get the impression, that a crosscheck would be opened about the injustice of the Allies against the injustice of the Nazis. He was scared that this could endanger the foreign policy turned toward reconciliation. However, it cannot be that the wrong of one site is discreet and the wrong of the other site get accused again and again. <http://home.arcor.de/kriegsgefangen/photos/rheinwiese.gif> In this air picture of the "Rheinwiesenlager" represents every dot a German soldier sitting on the bare field for month. They graved holes to be protected of the wind at least. Some drowned in their foxhole when it rained strongly because they were too weak to creep out, died by their war wounds, by diarrhea, starved..... A horrible catastrophe. The viable prisoners where obliged to forced labor in France and England for many years. To this the Americans submitted to the French powers approx. 800.000 men. The need of the prisoners was particularly great in France. This doesn't have to be explained by revenge, hate or prejudices but we must consider, that large portions of France were destroyed and the Frenchmen had to suffer under a lack of food also. On 8-21-1945 the ICRC wrote a memorandum, that the life of 200.000 German POW's in French custody where immediately endangered, 2000 would hardly recover, 2000 could take no food and had to be fed artificially and 600.000 men had only inadequate accommodations what dangers their life in the approaching winter. Like on a slave market, farmers chose their workers. Thigh, arms and teeth were examined but the soldiers had not to be naked during that procedure like in Russia. A speedy dismissal was offered to soldiers who voluntarily reported for mine clearing commands in view to their highly dangerous job. But, the explanation was even given in writing, the soldiers who risked their life day for day were sent to the coal mines later. That made the prisoners so brittle that some recruited to the Foreign Legion either and died for France on battle-fields in Alger or Indochina, mutilated their self or tried an escape like 171.029 POW did.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule
    http://abbc.com/nj/images/njlogo1.gif
    http://abbc.com/nj/e2001/history/german_holocaust.htm

    THE WORST ATROCITY OF
    WORLD WAR II

    By CHRISTIAN BORLEIS

    As soon as World War II ended, the United States began shipping food to the hundreds of millions of people acing starvation as a result

    of the war. Unprecedented in world history; this massive program fulfilled the highest ideals. Our generosity seemed to have no limit. We fed former enemies Italy and Japan as well as a new enemy, the Soviet Union. Only Germany was left out.

    It is well known that for the next 50 years the Allies hanged and incarcerated Nazis for their alleged crimes, the murder of 6 million Jews and their alleged criminal conduct of war. The crimes against the Jews seemed to be well documented but were a concoction. The verdict of guilty was a requisite of hanging the political and military leadership and also to justify the ravaging of the vanquished enemy.

    Far worse than the crimes against the Jews and the pretended general war crimes by the Germans was in fact the National Socialist philosophy, which was intolerable to the international bankers. National Socialism stood against the international capitalism of the West and the communism of the East. Between those superpowers National Socialism emerged, forged by a determined leader to liberate a demoralised country

    The cruelty imposed on defeated Germany was nothing new to the Germans. They had experienced a hunger blockade after World War I. During those eight months eight hundred thousand people died. The Allies didn’t even allow the German fishing fleet to go to sea.
    <http://abbc.com/nj/images/muknd.gif> This child looks at you, and to all those who enjoyed the terrible slaughters of Germans as "the only just war of the century"!

    He doesn't need words - the little face says it all

    The above foto was taken in Bromberg (West Prussia) on January 22, 1945. It shows a German mother with her little boy. The two were unable to flee Ehrenburg's genocidal Red troops (Morgenthau raged in the west). Ehrenburg's hordes then proceeded to liberate the helpless boy's mother from Hitler. This liberating orgy of rape also "liberated her of her life". For three days and nights the sobbing child clung to his dead mother's hair, until the last strength left his exhausted little body. Heads together, the two, united forever, lay on scorched German earth.

    The occupying Allied armies carved 25 percent of Germany’s most fertile land (Silesia, Pomerania, East Prussia and Bohemia) and placed it under Russian and Polish control, forcibly expelling at least 8 (and some claim 12) million people into what remained of Germany It has been forgotten that the Allies kept millions of prisoners in forced labour camps. International charitable aid to Germany was banned for another year, then restricted for more than one year. When it was permitted, it came too late for millions of people.

    The Allies slashed production of oil, tractors, steel and products essential to an industrial nation. They cut fertiliser production by 82 percent They undervalued German exports, depriving Germans of

    cash needed to buy food. During the next three years following the end of the war Germany’s industrial production fell by 75 percent. The loss of fertile land and the drop in fertiliser supplies caused agricultural production to fall by 65 percent Sixty million people began to starve.

    The mass expulsions from one part of Germany to another, approved at the Allied victory conference at Potsdam in July and August 1945, were enforced with a maximum of brutality. In the West, the plan to dismantle German industrial capacity began at the headquarters of Gen. Dwight Eisenhower in August of 1944. Eisenhower prescribed a treatment for Germany that would be "good and hard," giving as his reason that "the whole German population is synthetic [sic] paranoid."

    With 13 percent of Germany’s heavy industry destroyed during the war, an additional 3 percent was dismantled afterward, according to German statistics.

    But it was the Jewish World Organisation and the Zionist World Congress which saved Germany from this fate of industrial destruction. It was thought that the Germans could be made to pay restitution for the "enormous crime of genocide." In order to commit them to that task they would need to keep the remaining industry intact. The German industrial capacity was restored to aid Israel.
    <http://abbc.com/nj/images/wende.jpg>

    Nov. 11, 1944 young German Josef Wende was murdered by the Allied-Armies for wearing a German uniform.

    The government of Chancellor Konrad Adenauer conducted a massive survey about the deaths of German prisoners of war in Allied camps. It was found that some 1.4 million died in captivity. The fall of the Soviet empire in 1989 provided a spectacular test of the truth; the KGB archives were opened for historical scrutiny and the reports from KGB Col. I. Bulanov revealed that 460,000 German POWs had died in Soviet camps alone. In addition, the KGB records show that the Soviets had also imprisoned hundreds of thousands of German civilians, of whom thousands died.

    Documents from the National Archives in Ottawa, Moscow, Washington and Stanford, Conn., recently revealed that the Allies not only destroyed most major industry but also reduced German food production.

    A comparison of German censuses of 1946 and 1950 shows the effect of food shortages. The 1950 census showed 5.7 million people fewer than there should have been according to the number of people recorded in the 1946 census, minus officially reported deaths, plus births and "immigrants" (people expelled from the east and returning prisoners) in the period from 1946 to 1950. The total tally of unacknowledged deaths among prisoners, refugees and non-expelled civilians comes to about nine million people between 1945 and 1950, far more than the number who died during the war itself. All of these deaths were surplus to those actually reported. Moreover, those deaths occurred in peacetime while the world media did not bother to report of them.

    Courtesy of THE DECKERT-DISPATCH, P.O. Box 101117, D-69451 WEINHEIM, GERMANY

    The Torah-True-Jews proclaim: "[The Zionists] provoked and increased anti-Semitism in Europe which led to the Second World War ... The world-wide boycott against Germany in 1933 and the later all-out declaration of war against Germany, initiated by the Zionist leaders and the World Jewish Congress ... The Role of Zionism in the Holocaust ... The Zionist leaders: 'Spiritually and Physically Responsible'." (www.jewsnotzionists.org)
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule
    http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v10/v10p161_Brech.html
    In 'Eisenhower's Death Camps': Part I -- A U.S. Prison Guard's Story
    Martin Brech

    In October 1944, at age eighteen, I was drafted into the U.S. army. Largely because of the "Battle of the Bulge," my training was cut short. My furlough was halved, and I was sent overseas immediately. Upon arrival in Le Havre, France, we were quickly loaded into box cars and shipped to the front. When we got there, I was suffering increasingly severe symptoms of mononucleosis, and was sent to a hospital in Belgium. Since mononucleosis was then known as the "kissing disease," I mailed a letter of thanks to my girlfriend.

    By the time I left the hospital, the outfit I had trained with in Spartanburg, South Carolina was deep inside Germany, so, despite my protests, I was placed in a "repo depot (replacement depot). I lost interest in the units to which I was assigned and don't recall all of them: non-combat units were ridiculed at that time. My separation qualification record states I was mostly with Company C, 14th Infantry Regiment, during my seventeen-month stay in Germany, but I remember being transferred to other outfits also.

    In late March or early April 1945, I was sent to guard a POW camp near Andernach along the Rhine. I had four years of high school German, so I was able to talk to the prisoners, although this was forbidden. Gradually, however, I was used as an interpreter and asked to ferret out members of the S.S. (I found none.)

    In Andernach about 50,000 prisoners of all ages were held in an open field surrounded by barbed wire. The women were kept in a separate enclosure I did not see until later. The men I guarded had no shelter and no blankets; many had no coats. They slept in the mud, wet and cold, with inadequate slit trenches for excrement. It was a cold, wet spring and their misery from exposure alone was evident.

    Even more shocking was to see the prisoners throwing grass and weeds into a tin can containing a thin soup. They told me they did this to help ease their hunger pains. Quickly, they grew emaciated. Dysentery raged, and soon they were sleeping in their own excrement, too weak and crowded to reach the slit trenches. Many were begging for food, sickening and dying before our eyes. We had ample food and supplies, but did nothing to help them, including no medical assistance.

    Outraged, I protested to my officers and was met with hostility or bland indifference. When pressed, they explained they were under strict orders from "higher up." No officer would dare do this to 50,000 men if he felt that it was "out of line," leaving him open to charges. Realizing my protests were useless, I asked a friend working in the kitchen if he could slip me some extra food for the prisoners. He too said they were under strict orders to severely ration the prisoners' food and that these orders came from "higher up." But he said they had more food than they knew what to do with and would sneak me some.

    When I threw this food over the barbed wire to the prisoners, I was caught and threatened with imprisonment. I repeated the "offense," and one officer angrily threatened to shoot me. I assumed this was a bluff until I encountered a captain on a hill above the Rhine shooting down at a group of German civilian women with his .45 caliber pistol. When I asked, Why?," he mumbled, "Target practice," and fired until his pistol was empty. I saw the women running for cover, but, at that distance, couldn't tell if any had been hit.

    This is when I realized I was dealing with cold-blooded killers filled with moralistic hatred. They considered the Germans subhuman and worthy of extermination; another expression of the downward spiral of racism. Articles in the G.I. newspaper, Stars and Stripes, played up the German concentration camps, complete with photos of emaciated bodies; this amplified our self-righteous cruelty and made it easier to imitate behavior we were supposed to oppose. Also, I think, soldiers not exposed to combat were trying to prove how tough they were by taking it out on the prisoners and civilians.

    These prisoners, I found out, were mostly farmers and workingmen, as simple and ignorant as many of our own troops. As time went on, more of them lapsed into a zombie-like state of listlessness, while others tried to escape in a demented or suicidal fashion, running through open fields in broad daylight towards the Rhine to quench their thirst. They were mowed down.Some prisoners were as eager for cigarettes as for food, saying they took the edge off their hunger. Accordingly, enterprising G.I. "Yankee traders" were acquiring hordes of watches and rings in exchange for handfuls of cigarettes or less. When I began throwing cartons of cigarettes to the prisoners to ruin this trade, I was threatened by rank-and-file G.I.s too.

    The only bright spot in this gloomy picture came one night when.I was put on the "graveyard shift," from two to four A.M. Actually, there was a graveyard on the uphill side of this enclosure, not many yards away. My superiors had forgotten to give me a flashlight and I hadn't bothered to ask for one, disgusted as I was with the whole situation by that time. It was a fairly bright night and I soon became aware of a prisoner crawling under the wires towards the graveyard. We were supposed to shoot escapees on sight, so I started to get up from the ground to warn him to get back. Suddenly I noticed another prisoner crawling from the graveyard back to the enclosure. They were risking their lives to get to the graveyard for something; I had to investigate.

    When I entered the gloom of this shrubby, tree-shaded cemetery, I felt completely vulnerable, but somehow curiosity kept me moving. Despite my caution, I tripped over the legs of someone in a prone position. Whipping my rifle around while stumbling and trying to regain composure of mind and body, I soon was relieved I hadn't reflexively fired. The figure sat up. Gradually, I could see the beautiful but terror-stricken face of a woman with a picnic basket nearby. German civilians were not allowed to feed, nor even come near the prisoners, so I quickly assured her I approved of what she was doing, not to be afraid, and that I would leave the graveyard to get out of the way.

    I did so immediately and sat down, leaning against a tree at the edge of the cemetery to be inconspicuous and not frighten the prisoners. I imagined then, and still do now, what it would be like to meet a beautiful woman with a picnic basket, under those conditions as a prisoner. I have never forgotten her face.

    Eventually, more prisoners crawled back to the enclosure. I saw they were dragging food to their comrades and could only admire their courage and devotion.

    On May 8, V.E. Day, I decided to celebrate with some prisoners I was guarding who were baking bread the other prisoners occasionally received. This group had all the bread they could eat, and shared the jovial mood generated by the end of the war. We all thought we were going home soon, a pathetic hope on their part. We were in what was to become the French zone, where I soon would witness the brutality of the French soldiers when we transferred our prisoners to them for their slave labor camps.

    On this day, however, we were happy.

    As a gesture of friendliness, I emptied my rifle and stood it in the corner, even allowing them to play with it at theirs! request. This thoroughly "broke the ice," and soon we were singing songs we taught each other or I had learned in high school German ("Du, du liegst mir im Herzen"). Out of gratitude, they baked me a special small loaf of sweet bread, the only possible present they had left to offer. I stuffed it in my "Eisenhower jacket" and snuck it back to my barracks, eating it when I had privacy. I have never tasted more delicious bread, nor felt a deeper sense of communion while eating it. I believe a cosmic sense of Christ (the Oneness of all Being) revealed its normally hidden presence to me on that occasion, influencing my later decision to major in philosophy and religion.

    Shortly afterwards, some of our weak and sickly prisoners were marched off by French soldiers to their camp. We were riding on a truck behind this column. Temporarily, it slowed down and dropped back, perhaps because the driver was as shocked as I was. Whenever a German prisoner staggered or dropped back, he was hit on the head with a club until he died. The bodies were rolled to the side of the road to be picked up by another truck. For many, this quick death might have been preferable to slow starvation in our "killing fields."

    When I finally saw the German women in a separate enclosure, I asked why we were holding them prisoner. I was told they were "camp followers," selected as breeding stock for the S.S. to create a super-race. I spoke to some and must say I never met a more spirited or attractive group of women. I certainly didn't think they deserved imprisonment.

    I was used increasingly as an interpreter, and was able to prevent some particularly unfortunate arrests. One rather amusing incident involved an old farmer who was being dragged away by several M.P.s. I was told he had a "fancy Nazi medal," which they showed me. Fortunately, I had a chart identifying such medals. He'd been awarded it for having five children! Perhaps his wife was somewhat relieved to get him "off her back," but I didn't think one of our death camps was a fair punishment for his contribution to Germany. The M.P.s agreed and released him to continue his "dirty work."

    Famine began to spread among the German civilians also. It was a common sight to see German women up to their elbows in our garbage cans looking for something edible -- that is, if they weren't chased away.

    When I interviewed mayors of small towns and villages, I was told their supply of food had been taken away by "displaced persons" (foreigners who had worked in Germany), who packed the food on trucks and drove away. When I reported this, the response was a shrug. I never saw any Red Cross at the camp or helping civilians, although their coffee and doughnut stands were available everywhere else for us. In the meantime, the Germans had to rely on the sharing of hidden stores until the next harvest.

    Hunger made German women more "available," but despite this, rape was prevalent and often accompanied by additional violence. In particular I remember an eighteen-year old woman who had the side of her faced smashed with a rifle butt and was then raped by two G.I.s. Even the French complained that the rapes, looting and drunken destructiveness on the part of our troops was excessive. In Le Havre, we'd been given booklets warning us that the German soldiers had maintained a high standard of behavior with French civilians who were peaceful, and that we should do the same. In this we failed miserably.

    "So what?" some would say. "The enemy's atrocities were worse than ours." It is true that I experienced only the end of the war, when we were already the victors. The German opportunity for atrocities had faded; ours was at hand. But two wrongs don't make a right. Rather than copying our enemy's crimes, we should aim once and for all to break the cycle of hatred and vengeance that has plagued and distorted human history. This is why I am speaking out now, forty-five years after the crime. We can never prevent individual war crimes, but we can, if enough of us speak out, influence government policy. We can reject government propaganda that depicts our enemies as subhuman and encourages the kind of outrages I witnessed. We can protest the bombing of civilian targets, which still goes on today. And we can refuse ever to condone our government's murder of unarmed and defeated prisoners of war.

    I realize it is difficult for the average citizen to admit witnessing a crime of this magnitude, especially if implicated himself. Even G.I.s sympathetic to the victims were afraid to complain and get into trouble, they told me. And the danger has not ceased. Since I spoke out a few weeks ago, I have received threatening calls and had my mailbox smashed. But its been worth it. Writing about these atrocities has been a catharsis of feeling suppressed too long, a liberation, and perhaps will remind other witnesses that "the truth will make us free, have no fear." We may even learn a supreme lesson from all this: only love can conquer all.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule

    Eisenhower was nicknamed "The Swedish Jew" as a cadet at the United States Military Academy at West Point.  In Ike's time USMA cadets were required to be 100% white and non-negroid, or as close to that as medical doctors and geneological research could then ascertain.  Serious official questions arose about Ike's obvious part non-white genetic heritage.  These appeared to be negroid in origin.   "Ike" explained this away as being due to a Jewish ancestor from Sweden, hence the nickname "The Swedish Jew".
    Military Academy cadets and other officer candidates get to know each other extremely well during their schooling, provided it's conducted on an intensive basis as U.S. officer schooling formerly was.  Everyone is at close quarters running 24/7.  There's no place to hide character traits in those conditions.  Cadet nicknames are usually extremely descriptive.  And when they're keyed to obvious non-white themes it's a warning signal to look deeper.  Here's another example.  The U.S. Pacific Fleet commander who allowed himself to be surprised at Pearl Harbor, Admiral Husband E. Kimmel, was nicknamed "Mustapha"as a midshipmen at the United States Naval Academy at Annapolis.  Other "Mustaphas" in Egypt and Syria allowed this to happen to themselves in 1967.
    The academy and officer training schools (used?) to take official advantage of that close quarters peer knowledge through an anonymous peer rating mechanism.  I knew this as "Top Five/Bottom Five" and it meant what it said.  Officer candidates rated their platoon fellows on leadership in rank order from Top One to Bottom x.  People who accumulated too many "Bottom Five" rankings were automatically scheduled for periodic official leadership review boards for enquiry into whether they should be dismissed without commission.  The presumption of such boards used to be such individuals should be dismissed unless they could prove they were worthy of commission.  Very, very few survived such review boards.
    Judeo-Marxist Academics like the military scribbler Weigley and the Jew military 'sociologist' Moscowitz are generally extremely hostile to processes like peer rating and also to troop election of officers at regimental level and below.  The admixture of females has added feminist hostility to the opposition to such processes.  The long-term result is a corps of military leaders who possess less and less confidence where it really counts.  That's among their soldiers.  This has gone so far that the average U.S. ground combat unit is unusable for its designed purpose.
    After long military experience and study the wisdom of both peer ratings and also electing regimental officers in militia and citizen-soldier units seems more and more profound to me.  I think the only safeguard needed is a veto power for general officers to remove obvious misfits.  You can conduct all the bureaucratic schooling processes you want.  But if an officer does not possess the confidence of his troops they will not follow him in combat, obey his orders or stay the course in difficult times.   Consequently years of academic training simply go to waste.  Electing first and schooling second is probably the best way.
    P.S.  The leadership qualities required from military leaders and from political leaders are not identical.  Some individuals combine these two attribute sets.   Hitler did not combine these qualities, at least at the lower infantry unit level.   This is proven by the fact he entered the Bavarian Army as a private and emerged after four years of war as a corporal.  Despite this many fellow war veterans from his former battalion willingly followed him as a political leader, including his former battalion sergeant-major and some officers.
    Nineteenth Century America managed to select many men for high office who did combine both leadership sets in fairly large numbers.  This more than anything explains the rapid conquest of the continent.  It was not 'luck'.  The old American Republic (long since vanished) actually conformed very closely in practice to the ideals of the old Roman Republic in both military process and results.  The Roman Republic constitutionally required that political leaders prove themselves as leaders in war.  This was an ideal for early Americans but not a definite legal requirement.   Had the Founding Fathers mandated this in the Constitution our history would have turned out very differently.  Certainly Canada, Mexico and Cuba would not exist as independent states. Whether this would have prevented subsequent miscegenation or the Civil War is another question.
    And results (output) are the real measure of military efficiency (or any other efficiency).  The military stature and efficiency of a state is not measured by the numbers of troops raised or the percentage of the budget applied to 'military' appropriations; i.e. inputs.  The Neo-con pseudo-patriots of the Judeo-Republican Party (non-veterans to a womandman) do think in these Communist terms of inputs.  If this measurement were valid then Italy would be one of the military success stories of the 20th Century rather than one of the premier failures.  When judged by this standard of results 19th Century America was a resounding success as a military state.   Twentieth Century America was a military failure to the point that political loss of territory is now occuring in the Southwest.
    P.P.S.  Note to the former student of Russell F. Weigley who wrote in to defend him.
    In my 1984 edition of Weigley's "History of the United States Army" he devotes about 40 pages to the War of 1812.  He dedicates nearly all of this to harping on the relatively small Congressional size authorization and even lower actual personnel fill (about 20,000) of the "Regular Army".  In this section Weigley glosses over the militia contribution in the sentence "this number was exclusive of those men from the volunteer and common militias who served for short periods against British raids and invasions in their own districts and who may have numbered in the hundreds of thousands."
    Then Weigley reverts back to beating to death obscurities like poor Regular Army horse recruitment and rotten contractor commissary stores.  The obscure "Battle of Lundy's Lane" (actually a minor skirmish around Niagara) receives an extensive autopsy.  The Battles of Put-in Bay, New Orleans and General Harrison's campaign to reconquer the Northwest are ignored.  These large-scale decisive events were commanded by regular officers leading Weigley's ignored militia.
    And New Orleans was decisive despite being fought after 'peace' was signed.   Anyone who thinks the extermination of Britain's best veteran regiments at the hands of frontier militia didn't exercise a subsequent deterrent effect on British decision-making doesn't understand how governments arrive at war and peace decisions.   The British decision to negotiate over "Fifty-four Forty or Fight!" in the 1840s was undoubtedly influenced by that memory.
    If Weigley had ever marched even once 20 miles with a 100 pound pack in 100 degree heat he would have understood something.  Even 100,000 perfectly trained regulars alone would have resulted in American defeat.  In the early 19th Century transport proceeded by foot, by horse or by sea.  Since the British had overall naval superiority moving troops by sea convoy was not possible.  This left marching on land.  The factors of force/space/time applied to North America dictated that the early Republic had to rely on 'militia'.  This was especially true when fighting an enemy possessing command of the sea and the choice of where and when to strike with large amphibious raiding parties.  There was no possibility of a timely counter-concentration of a central reserve at the tactical level, especially on defense.   This comes back to Nathan Bedford Forrest's "he who gets theah fustest with mostest."  Overall numbers are irrelevant in such conditions unless you create a 'nation in arms' as was done by the Militia Act of 1792.
    Like I said, Weigley's book is worthless garbage that should be collected up and pulped.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule
    [1990] A U.S. PRISON GUARD AT ONE OF "IKE'S DEATH CAMPS"
    By Martin Brech
    FORTY-FIVE years ago, I witnessed an atrocity: the deliberate starvation of German POWs by our own army. History, written by the victors, suppressed all news of this atrocity until James Bacque, a Canadian author, published his brilliant expose, OTHER LOSSES. This book is a best seller in Canada, a sensation in Europe, yet is virtually unavailable (censored?) in the U.S. Our major booksellers told me their distributors are not handling it. When I prevailed upon a small, independent bookstore to order direct from Canada, the publisher told them they would be the only store in New York State to carry the book. This in 'the land of the free'?"
    Fortunately, Pat Buchanan called attention to OTHER LOSSES in his January 10, 1990 column. He wrote:
    "Conclusion: the U.S. Army killed ten times as many Germans in POW camps as we did on battlefields from Normandy to V.E. day. (German POWs) had their rations cut below survival level until they were dying at rates up to 30% of exposure, starvation and neglect... Red Cross food trains were turned back and U.S. food shipments sat on the docks...One French officer said the U.S. camps reminded him of Dachau and Buchenwald...The book blames Eisenhower. 'The German is a beast,' Ike had written... But that was not how the Canadians and British felt, who treated their prisoners justly...It was not the view of General Mark Clark, nor of Patton...Ignoring the book is not enough."
    Pat Buchanan's courageous column inspired me to help end the cover-up of the atrocity I had witnessed. I wrote letters to several newspapers which were, of necessity, short and incomplete. Now I would like to finally free more of my painful memories, hoping to be heard, so that this will help us to acknowledge our share in the "banality of evil", cleansing ourselves with the truth. Perhaps we as a nation may then put this behind us with some integrity and with some hope for redemption.
    In October 1944, at age eighteen, I was drafted into the army while a student at the NYS College of Forestry. Largely due to the "Battle of the Bulge", my training was cut short, my furlough cut in half, and I was then immediately sent overseas. Upon arrival in Le Havre, France, we were quickly loaded into boxcars and shipped to the front. By the time we reached it, I had developed mononucleosis severely enough to be sent to a hospital in Belgium.
    By the time I left the hospital, the unit I had trained with in Spartenburg, South Carolina was so deeply into Germany that I warn placed in a "repo depo" (a replacement depot) despite my protests. I then lost interest in which units I was assigned to because non-combat units were generally not respected. My separation qualification record states that I served mostly with the 14th Infantry Regiment, during which time I guarded prisoners of war and served as an interpreter. During my seventeen month stay in Germany, I was transferred to other outfits also.
    In late March or early April 1945, I was assigned to help guard a POW camp near Andernach along the Rhine. I had four years of high school German, so I was able to talk to the prisoners, although this was forbidden.
    Gradually, however, I was used as an interpreter and asked to ferret out the S.S. (I found none.)
    In Andernach, between 50,000 and 65,000 prisoners, ranging in age from very young teens to very old men, were crowded together in an open field surrounded by barbed wire. The women were kept in a separate enclosure which I did not see until later. The men I guarded had no tents or other shelter, no blankets and many had no coats. Inadequate numbers of slit trenches were provided for excrement, and so the men lived and slept in the mud and increasing filth during a cold, wet spring. Their misery from exposure alone was evident.
    It was even more shocking to see them eating grass, sometimes throwing it into a tin can containing a thin soup. They told me they did this hoping to ease their hunger pains. Soon their emaciation was evident. Dysentery raged and, too weak and crowded to reach the slit trenches, they were increasingly sleeping in excrement. I saw no sign of provision for water, so the thin soup was their food and water for the day. Some days there was bread, less than a slice each. Other days there was nothing.
    The sight of so many men desperate for food and water, sickening and dying before our eyes, is indescribable. Even now, I can only think of it momentarily.
    We had ample food and supplies that could have been shared more humanely, and we could have offered some medical assistance, but did nothing. Only the dead were quickly and efficiently taken care of: hauled away to mass graves.
    My outrage reached the point that I protested to my officers, but I was met with hostility or bland indifference. When pressed, they explained they were under strict orders from "higher up". No officer would dare to systematically do this to over 50,000 prisoners if he felt he was violating general policy and subject to court martial. The term "war criminal" was just beginning to come into fashion.
    Realizing my protests were useless, I asked a friend working in the kitchen if he could slip me some extra food for the prisoners. He too repeated that they were under strict orders to severely ration the prisoners' food, and that these orders came from "higher up". But he said they had more food than they knew what to do with and would sneak me some.
    When I threw this food over the barbed wires to the prisoners I was caught and threatened with imprisonment. I repeated the "offense", and one officer threatened to shoot me. I naturally assumed this was a bluff, but I began to have some doubts after I encountered a captain on a hill above the Rhine shooting down at a group of German civilian women with his .45 caliber pistol. When I asked, "Why?" he mumbled, "Target practice," and fired until his pistol was empty. I saw the women running for cover, but, at that distance, couldn't tell if any had been hit.
    This is when I more fully realized I was dealing with some cold-blooded killers filled with moralistic hatred. They considered the Germans sub-human and worthy of extermination; another expression of the downward spiral of racism. Articles in the G.I. newspaper, Stars & Stripes, played up the Nazi concentration camps, complete with photographs of emaciated bodies; this amplified our self-righteous cruelty and made it easier to imitate behavior we were supposed to oppose. Also, I think, soldiers not exposed to combat were trying to prove how tough they were by taking it out on the prisoners and civilians. At least, many combat soldiers told me later they would not have tolerated this, for they combined hatred with respect for a courageous enemy.
    The prisoners I spoke to were mostly simple farmers and workingmen, as ignorant, albeit nationalistic, as many of our own troops. I heard many versions of "my country, right or wrong, my country," which we still hear in our own country today.
    As time went on, many of them lapsed into a Zombie-like state of listlessness. Others, maddened by thirst, tried to escape in a desperate or suicidal fashion, running through open fields in broad daylight towards the Rhine to quench their thirst. They were mowed down.
    Some prisoners were extremely eager for cigarettes, saying they took the edge off their hunger. Accordingly, some enterprising G.I. "Yankee traders" were acquiring hordes of wrist watches and rings in exchange for handfuls of cigarettes or less. When I began throwing cartons of cigar-ettes to the prisoners to ruin this trade, I found myself threatened by rank-and-file G.I.s also. At least this taught me an indelible lesson: how wrong majorities and authorities can be.
    A bright spot in this gloomy picture came, oddly enough, one night when I was put on the "graveyard shift", from two to four A.M. Actually, there was a graveyard on the uphill side of this enclosure, not many yards away. My superiors had forgotten to give me a flashlight and I hadn't bothered to ask, being disgusted with the whole situation by that time. It was a fairly bright night and I soon became aware of a prisoner crawling under the wires to the graveyard. We were supposed to shoot escapees on sight, so I started to get up to warn him to get back. Suddenly I noticed another prisoner crawling from the graveyard back to the enclosure. They were risking their lives to get to the graveyard for something; I had to investigate.
    When I entered the gloom of this shrubby, tree-shaded cemetery, I never felt more vulnerable, but somehow curiosity kept me going. Despite my caution, I tripped over the legs of someone in a prone position. Whipping my rifle around while stumbling and trying to regain composure of mind and body, I soon was relieved I hadn't reflexively fired. The figure sat up, moving erratically. Gradually I could see the beautiful but terror-stricken face of a woman with a picnic basket nearby. German civilians were not allowed to feed, nor even come near, the prisoners, so I quickly assured her I approved of what she was doing, not to be afraid, and that I would leave the graveyard to get out of the way, telling no one.
    I left the graveyard as quickly as possible and sat down, leaning against a tree at the edge CF the cemetary to be inconspicuous and not frighten the prisoners. I imagined then, and often since, what it would be like to be a prisoner under those conditions and meet a beautiful woman with a picnic basket. I never saw her again, but I have never forgotten her face.
    While I watched, more prisoners crawled to and from the enclosure. I saw they were dragging food back to their comrades and could only admire their courage and devotion. As I walked back to my quarters at the end of my shift, a nightingale and I were singing -- both felt a touch of spring.
    (I originally did not intend to reveal the following incident, for it moves into a realm termed "mystical". However, for me, it was an extremely significant experience, changing my life, providing a light no darkness can extinguish. It must be told, hoping it will foster understanding.)
    On May 8, V.E. day, I decided to celebrate with some prisoners I was guarding who were baking bread, meager amounts of which the other prisoners occasionally received. This group had all the bread they could eat, and shared the jovial mood generated by the end of the war. We all thought we would be going home soon, a pathetic hope on their part. We were in what was to become the French zone, and I later witnessed the brutality of the French soldiers when we transferred our prisoners to them for their slave labor camps (see below).
    However, on this day we were happy.
    After chatting with them about the potentials of peace for the rest of our lives, I decided to risk a gesture of trust that objectively would seem foolish. I emptied my rifle and stood it in the corner. They tested me further by asking to play with it, and I agreed. Intuitively I felt I could rely on their sense of honor not to attack me, for they knew they too were being tested. This thoroughly 'broke the ice', and soon we were singing songs we taught each other or I had learned in high school German ("Du, du, liegst mir im Herzen"). Out of gratitude, they secretly baked a small sweet bread and insisted I take it, explaining it was the only possible gift they had left to offer. Expressing my gratitude with a lump in my throat, I put it in my tight "Eisenhower jacket" so I could sneak it back to my barracks. I later found an opportunity to eat it outside.
    Never had bread tasted more delicious, nor conveyed to me a deeper sense of communion while eating it. A wonderful feeling pervaded me, gently opening me to an intimation of the Oneness of all Being. Through those prisoners I sensed the ~cosmic presence of what has been called the Christ, Buddha-nature, or, perhaps most aptly, the Ineffable: cosmically present, but hidden and apparently separate, until revealed in the wholeness of the giving of the self. Even within the horror humans had created, I was taught a path to redemption may open by taking a first, tentative step in the direction of love, understanding and forgiveness. This above all the prisoners taught me: not only are we all potentially humane humans, there is divinity within us waiting for us to dissolve the defensive shield of ego. I was pleased to discover later the words of Matthew 25:34-46, expressing the potential within prisoners and all who are at our mercy.
    Shortly after this experience I was plunged into even greater horror. Some of our weak and sickly prisoners were being marched off by French soldiers to their camp. The truck we were on first passed another truck picking up bodies along the side of the road, and then came up behind a slowly moving column of men. Temporarily we slowed down and remained behind, perhaps because the driver was as shocked as I was. The French soldiers were apparently incensed at the poor condition of our prisoners, not only for labor but for marching to another camp. Whenever a prisoner staggered or dropped back, the French clubbed him to death and then dragged him to the side of the road. For many, this quick death might have been preferable to their prolonged suffering. Even gas would have been more merciful than our murder by neglect in our slow 'killing fields'.
    When I saw the German women held in a separate enclosure, I asked why we were keeping them. I was told they were "camp followers", selected as breeding stock for the S.S. to create a super-race. We provided them with tents but they were extremely hungry. I spoke to some and must say they were still spirited and attractive. However, I believe I was objective enough when I told all concerned that I didn't think they deserved our treatment.
    As an interpreter, I was able to prevent some particularly unfortunate arrests. One somewhat amusing incident occurred during a pre-dawn raid we conducted on a town to discover Nazis or arms. An old farmer was being dragged away by some soldiers. I was told he had a "fancy Nazi medal", which they showed to me. Fortunately, I had a chart identifying such medals. He had been awarded it for having five or more children! Perhaps his wife was somewhat relieved to get him "off her back", but I didn't think one of our 'death camps' was a fair punishment for his contribution to Germany. The soldiers agreed and released him to continue his "dirty work".
    Famine was spreading amongst German civilians also. It was a common sight to see German women up to their elbows in our garbage cans looking for something edible -- that is, when they weren't chased away.
    When I interviewed mayors of small towns and villages, I was told their supply of food had been taken away by "displaced persons" (foreigners who had worked in Germany), who packed the food on trucks and drove away. When I reported this, the response was a shrug or an expression of helplessness.
    Although the Red Cross coffee and doughnut stands were available everywhere for us, I never saw any Red Cross in the prison camps or helping the civilians. While my girlfriend had all the "contraband" doughnuts she could eat, most Germans had to share their meager hidden stores and wait until the next harvest.
    This hunger undoubtedly made many German women more "available", but, despite this, rape was incredibly prevalent and often accompanied by additional violence. I particularly remember a charming eighteen year old girl who had several unsuccessful suitors and was "just friends" with me, who had the side of her face smashed with a rifle butt and was then raped by two G.I.s. The casual shooting of German civilians also continued, usually by drunken soldiers who would tell of this as something amusing. All too many G.I.s gave the impression they were 1ike animals released from cages, free to do what they liked because they were dealing with yet a lower species of animal, a reverse racism, inflamed by our propaganda. However, even the French complained to me that our rape and drunken destructive behavior in their country was excessive. When we had arrived in Le Havre, we had been given booklets instructing us that the Germans had maintained a high standard of behavior with French civilians who were peaceful, and that we should do the same. In this we failed miserably.
    So what? we might still say. The enemies' atrocities were worse than ours. Certainly my experiences were only of the last phases of the war, when we were already clearly the victors. The Nazi opportunity for atrocities had faded and ours was unleashed. But we might have learned the simple lesson that two wrongs do not make a right. Perhaps we might even have broken the cycle of vengeful retaliation and unbridled hatred, fed by racism, that has plagued human history and blighted human potential all to long. Instead, we committed our own atrocities and now are clinging to a cover-up. That is why I am speaking out now, forty-five years after the crime. We can never prevent individual war crimes, but we can, if enough of us speak out, influence government policy. We can reject government propaganda that depicts our enemies as subhuman and encourages the kinds of outrages I witnessed. We can protest the bombing of civilian targets, which still goes on today. (I will never forget the sickly sweet smell of rotting human flesh rising from the shattered remains of the cities and towns I entered.) And we can refuse ever to condone our government' s murder of unarmed and defeated prisoners of war.
    I realized it's difficult to admit witnessing a crime of this magnitude, especially if implicated oneself. Even G.I .s sympathetic to the victims told me they were afraid to oppose so massive a policy that would surely seek to cover its tracks. I never heard this directly from an officer, but it was the belief of the rank-and-file G.I.s I spoke to that we were not to "talk" because, first, no one would believe us, and second, we would surely get into trouble. They all insisted it was better not to talk, and slowly I too realized it would be futile and dangerous. That is, until now, thanks to James Bacque and Pat Buchanan. This is not to say the danger has passed. Since I "spoke out" recently, my mailbox has been smashed and I have received threatening phone calls. But I believe it is worth the risk. Writing about these atrocities has been a atharsis of feelings suppressed too long, a liberation, and perhaps will remind other witnesses and citizens -that "the truth shall make us free, have no fear." And, in any case, "the truth shall out".
    We may even learn a supreme lesson from all this: Hate is self- destructive; only love can conquer and evolve all as One.
    Martin Brech (Adjunct Professor, Philosophy & Religion, Mercy College; Ex-G.I., Finally Free)

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    horizontal rule


    Ike and the Disappearing Atrocities
    New York Times Book Review, February 24, 1991

    Seldom has the publication of a historical monograph on a subject ordinarily of interest only to a few specialists - the treatment of prisoners of war - received so much attention or excited so much anger as James Bacque's "Other Losses." Published in 1989 in Canada, it was the subject of a cover story in the popular Canadian magazine Saturday Night, of a British Broadcasting Corporation documentary, of two German television documentaries and of a coming Canadian Broadcasting Network documentary. (The Canadian book, I should say immediately, carries a jacket blurb from me that was taken out of context and used without permission) It has been discussed on American television, in Time magazine and in many other news media outlets. In its German edition, it was a runaway best seller. The British edition elicited major reviews in the Times Literary Supliment and elsewhere. Prima Publishing of California intendes to publish the book in May, which could fan the flames in the United States.

    The reason for the notoriety is the author's conclusion that Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, as head of the American occupation of Germany in 1945, deliberately starved to death German prisoners of war in staggering numbers. Mr. Bacque charges that "the victims undoubtedly number over 800,000, almost certainly over 800,000 and quite likely over a million. Their deaths were knowingly caused by army officers who had sufficient resources to keep the prisoners alive."

    Eisenhower's method, according to Mr. Bacque, was simple: he changed the designation of the prisoners from "Prisoners of War" (P.O.W.), required by the Geneva Convention to be fed the same rations as American G.I.'s, to "Disarmed Enemy Forces" (D.E.F.), which allowed him to cut their rations to starvation level. Mr. Bacque says the D.E.F. were also denied medical supplies and shelter. They died by the hundreds of thousands. Their deaths were covered up on Army records by listing them as "other looses" on charts showing weekly totals of prisoners on hand, numbers discharged and so forth.

    So outraged is Mr. Bacque by his discovery of this heinous crime that he has been quoted in a wire service interview as saying Americans "should take down every statue of Eisenhower, and every photograph of him and annul his memory from American history as best they can, except to say, 'Here was a man who did very evil things that we're ashamed of.'" Questions immediately arise. If there were a million dead, where are the bodies? Did Eisenhower have such vast power that he could order starvation on a mass scale and keep it a secret? Was the undoubted suffering in the camps, especially the transit camps along the Rhine, the result of Eisenhower's policy or the result of the chaotic conditions that prevailed in Europe in the spring and summer of 1945?

    Mr. Bacque, a Canadian novelist with no previous historical research or writing experience, says in his introduction: "Doubtless many scholars will find faults in this book, which are only mine. I welcome their criticism and their further research, which may help to restore to us the truth after a long night of lies." Last December, the Eisenhower Center at the University of New Orleans invited some leading experts on the period to examine the charges. The conference participants, including me, plan to publish the papers in book form.

    Our first conclusion was that Mr. Bacque had made a major historical discovery. There _was_ wdiespread mistreatment of German prisoners in the spring and summer of 1945. Men were beaten, denied water, forced to live in open camps without shelter, given inadequate food rations and inadequate medical care. Their mail was withheld. In some cases prisoners made a "soup" of water and grass in order to deal with their hunger. Men did die needlessly and inexcusably. This must be confronted, and it is to Mr. Bacque's credit that he forces us to do so.

    Our second conclusion was that when scholars do the necessary research, they will find Mr. Bacque's work to be worse than worthless. It is seriously - nay, spectacularly - flawed in its most fundamental aspects. Mr. Bacque misuses documents; he misreads documents; he ignores contrary evidence; his statistical methodology is hopelessly compromised; he makes no attempt to look at comparative contexts; he puts words into the mouth of his principal source; he ignores a readily available and absolutely critical source that decisively deals with his central accusation; and, as a consequence of these and and other shortcomings, he reaches conclusions and makes charges that are demonstrably absurd.

    Apart from its assessment of Mr. Bacque's findings, however, the conference - along with the book itself - raises a larger issue: how are readers who are not experts to judge a work that makes new, startling, indeed outrageious, claims? Without the knowledge or the time to investigate, how are they to know if an author has finally revealed the truth "after a long night of lies," or is simply misleading an unwary public?

    As for Mr. Bacque's claims, the most immediate question is that of Eisenhower's motive: why on earth would Ike do such a thing? Mr. Bacque answers that Eisenhower hated the Germans. Now it is absolutely true that in the spring of 1945, Eisenhower's anger at the Germans was very great. He never attempted to hide these feelings. In "Crusade in Europe," published in 1948, he wrote, "In my personal reactions, as the months of conflict wore on, I grew constantly more bitter against the Germans." He relates that he signed tens of thousands of letters of condolence to the wives and mothers of his fallen men, and he wrote, "I know of no more effective means of developing an undying hatred of those responsible for aggressive war than to assume the obligation of attemption to express sympathy to families bereaved by it." The uncovering of the concentration camps added to his emotion.

    Eisenhower was an enthusiastic supporter of denazification, but not because he hated the Germans or believed in collective guilt. To the contrary, he believed that there were Germans who were committed to democracy and that the task of the occupation was to find them and bring them to the fore. In a speech in Frankfurt in 1945, he declared "The success or failure of this occupation will be judged by the character of the Germans 50 years from now. Proof will come when they begin to run a democracy of their own and we are going to give the Germans a chance to do that, in time." This does not sound like a man who simultaneously was directing the death by starvation of one million young Germans.

    Mr. Bacque completely misunderstands Eisenhower's position and activity in the occupation. He puts full responsibility on Eisenhower for every policy decision, never recognizing that he had superiors from whom he took policy directives and orders - specifically, the Army Chief of Staff, the European Advisory Commission, acting in the name and with the authority of the British, Soviet and American Governments, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Combined Chiefs of Staff, that is, the American Joint Chiefs and the British Chiefs of Staff; and the heads of the British and American Governments. The report at the New Orleans conference on the diplomatic background, by Brian Villa of the University of Ottawa, noted that the policy of Eisenhower's superiors was to impress upon the Germans the fact of their defeat, the fact that they had brought it on themselves and in other ways to "treat 'em rough." Denazification was one aspect of that policy. Another was that German prisoners would not be fed at a higher level than German civilians, than the civilians of the liberated nations, or than the displaced persons (DPs).

    An assertion that is central to Mr. Bacque's accusation is his contention that there was no European food shortage in 1945. He points to warehouses in Germany full of food. He says that the Red Cross had food available. One of his most daming pieces of evidence is that a train from Geneva loaded with food parcels sent by the Red Cross to feed German prisoners was forced to turn back.

    This is shocking - food was available, men were hungry and American officers ordered the train to return to Geneva. But there was a reason: the Allied Governments had decided that Red Cross food parcels would be used to feed displaced persons, of whom there were more than two million in Germany, and the orders to Eisenhower on this policy were explicit. So DPs got those food parcels. It is painful beyond description to have to set food priorities in a hungry world, but it had to be done, and who could argue with the decision?

    In his conference report on the food situation in Germany, James Tent of the University of Alabama - Brimingham says there was no question that there were severe shortages. Still, as Mr. Tent points out, there was food stocked in warehouses that was not distributed to prisoners living on a near-starvation diet. Again, this is shocking, until the reason is noted. The Allied Governments were fearful of famine in the winter of 1945-46, and they were stockpiling food. Even with the reserves, they barely got through the winter, and it was three years before the European foot shortage was overcome.

    Mr. Bacque's myth was Eisenhower's nightmare. No food shortage? Eisenhower wrote the Chief of Staff, Gen. George C. Marshall, in Februayr 1945: "I am very much concerned about the food situation... We now have no reserves on the Continent of supplies for the civil population."

    And here is Eisenhower writing to the Combined Chiefs of Staff on April 25, 1945: "Unless immediate steps are taken to develop to the fullest extent possible the food resources in order to provide the minimum wants of the German population, widespread chaos, starvation and disease are inevitable during the coming winter."

    These - and many, many similar messages - went out before the surrender. After the first week of May, all of Eisenhower's calculations as to how many people he would be required to feed in occupied Germany became woefully inadequate. He had badly underestimated, for two reasons. First, the number of German soldiers surrendering to the Western Allies far exceeded what was expected (more than five million, instead of the anticipated three million) because of the onrush of German soldiers across the Elbe River to escape the Russians. So too with German civilians - there were millions fleeing from east to west, about 13 million altogether, and they became Eisenhower's responsibility. Eisenhower faced shortages even before he learned that there were 17 million more people to feed in Germany than he had expected.

    No food shortage? This is the report of the Military Governor for Germany in July 1945: "The food situation throughout Western Germany is perhaps the most serious problem of the occupation. The average food consumption in the Western Zones is now about one-third below the generally accepted subsistence level." The September report declares, "Food from indigenous sources was not available to meet the present authorized ration level for the normal consumer, of 1,550 calories per day."

    Mr. Bacque says that the prisoners were receiving 1,550 calories a day, and he contends that such a ration means slow starvation. He apparently never looked at what civilians were getting, in Germany or in the liberated countries. In Paris in 1945, the calorie level was 1,550 for civilians. It was only slightly higher in Briatin, where rationing continued. It was much lower in Russia, where rationing also continued. As noted, the official ration for German civilians was 1,550, but often not met. In Vienna in the summer of 1945 the official ration sometimes fell to 500.

    There is such a thing as common sense. Anyone who was in Europe in the summer of 1945 would be flabbergasted to hear that there was no food shortage.

    According to Mr. Bacque, Eisenhower personally, secretly, and with sinister intent changed the status of surrendered German soldiers from prisoners of war to disarmed enemy forces. In fact, the change in designation was a policy matter. The decision was made not by Eisenhower but by his superiors, specifically by the European Advisory Commission. Nor was any attempt made to keep it secret. All those involved acted with the authority of the British, Russian and American Governments, and they were perfectly straightforward about the reason for the change in status.

    What happened is simple enough: the Allies could not afford to feed the millions of German prisoners at the same level at which they were able to feed German civilians, not to mention the civilians of the liberated countries of Western Europe, and not to mention as well the displaced persons. But the United States and other Allied nations had signed the Geneva Convention, which had the force of a treaty. They did not wish to violate it, so they used the new designation of "Disarmed Enemy Forces." The orders to the field commanders were straighforward: do not feed the DEF's at a higher scale than German civilians.

    With regard to another of Mr. Bacque's conclusions, he arrives at his sensational figure of one million dead through a system of analysis that has left almost everyone who has tried to check his statistics and methods befuddled. He did make one mistake because of a typing error by a clerk. He saw a figure of 70,000 prisoners in an Army medical report and then calculated the total death rate for all prisoners in American hands on the basis of that number and the 21,000 deaths also mentioned in the report. That is, he arrived at his most basic conclusion, a death rate in all camps of 30 percent, by dividing the 21,000 deaths by the 70,000 prisoners. However, the 70,000 figure should have been 10 times higher. All other figures in the document make it clear that the correct number of prisoners was 700,000. This would make the death rate not 30 percent but 3 percent.

    In fact, as Albert Cowdrey of the Department of the Army's Center of Military History reported to the conference, the overall death rate among German prisoners was 1 percent.

    Mr. Cowdrey's conclusion, strongly supported by another conference participant, Maj. Ruediger Overmans of the German Office of Military History in Freiburg (who is writing the final volume of the official Germany history of the war), is that the total death by all causes of German prisoners in American hands could not have been greater than 56,000.

    Finally, there is the matter of the column of figures in the weekly reports of the United States Army Theater Provost Marshal entitled "Other Losses." It is here that Mr. Bacque finds his "missing million."

    What were the "other losses?" Mr. Bacque interviewed Philip S. Lauben, a retired Army colonel who was a member of the German Affairs Branch of Eisenhower's headquarters in 1945. He writes that Colonel Lauben told him "other losses" meant "deaths and escapes."

    "How many escapes?" Mr. Bacque asked.

    "Very, very minor," Colonel Lauben replied. Mr. Bacque says they were less than one-tenth of 1 percent, with no explanation of how he arrived at such a figure.

    Neil Cameron, the producer of the BBC documentary about "Other Losses," told the conference that he had obtained from Mr. Bacque the tape of the interview. It seemed clear to Mr. Cameron that Mr. Bacque had got an old man to agree with words that Mr. Bacque used and then put in his mouth. Mr. Cameron did his own on-camera interview with Colonel Lauben; in it, Colonel Lauben said he was misled by Mr. Bacque and was wrong about the meaning of the term "other losses."

    David Hawkins of CNN wanted to do an interview with Colonel Lauben. Colonel Lauben turned him down, explaining in a letter "I'm not being difficult. I am 91 years old, legally blind, and my memory has lapsed to a point where it is quite unreliable. Furthermore I am under regular medical care. Often during my talk with Mr. Bacque I reminded him that my memory had deteriorated badly during the 40 odd years since 1945.

    "Mr. Bacque read to me figures...It seemed to me that, after accounting for transfers and discharges, there was nothing left to make up the grand total except deaths and escapes, i.e. the term 'Other Losses.' I was mistaken."

    Thus, Mr. Bacque's only witness for the charge that "other losses" was a cover-up term for deaths has twice repudiated what Mr. Bacque maintains that he said.

    What then were the "other losses?" In many cases they were transfers from one zone to another, something that was regularly done for a variety of reasons, none of them sinister, and all duly recorded in footnotes on the weekly reports.

    But the greatest number of "other losses" is revealed in the August 1945 Report of the Military Governor. (These monthly reports are in the Eisenhower Library in Abilene, Kan., in the National Archives in Washington and elsewhere; they are a basic source on every aspect of the occupation, including food shortages and prisoners. Mr. Bacque did not cite them and there is no evidence he examined them.) The August report lists the numbers of disarmed enemy forces discharged by American forces and those transferred to the British and French for forced labor.

    The report continues: "An additional group of 663,576 are listed as 'other losses,' consisting largely of members of the Volksturm [Peoples' Militia], released without formal discharge."

    It takes little imagination to see what happened here. The People's Militia consisted of older men (up to 80 years of age, mainly World War I veterans) and boys of 16 or sometimes less. American guards and camp authorities told the old men to go home and take care of their grandchildren, the boys to go home and return to school. Along with the transfers to other zones that Mr. Bacque ignores, these people account for all the "missing million."

    In short, Mr. Bacque is wrong on every major charge and nearly all his minor ones. Eisenhower was not a Hitler, he did not run death camps, German prisoners did not die by the hundreds of thousands, there was a severe food shortage in 1945, there was nothing sinister or secret about the "disarmed enemy forces" designation or about the column "other losses." Mr. Bacque's "missing million" were old men and young boys in the militia.

    Nevertheless, Mr. Bacque makes a point that is irrefutable: some American G.I.'s and their officers were capable of acting in almost as brutal a manner as the Nazis. We did not have a monopoly on virtue. He has challenged us to reopen the question, to do the research required, to get at the full truth. For that contribution, he deserves thanks. But as to how he presented his discovery, I turn again to Albert Cowdrey: "Surely the author has reason to be satisfied with his achievement. He has no reputation as a historian to lose, and "Other Losses" can only enhance his standing as a writer of fiction." There remains, finally, the larger issue. It took a conference of experts to challenge Mr. Bacque's charges. Individual scholars have hesitated to take him on because to do so required checking through his research - in effect, rewriting his book. Instead, many of them have said in their reviews in Britain, France, Germany and Canada that they cannot believe what Mr. Bacque says about Eisenhower is true, but they cannot disprove it. Mr. Bacque has all the paraphernalia of scholarship; it looks impressive enough to bamboozle even scholars. Under these circumstances, what is a lay reader to do? I suggest that he or she trust common sense. As when confronting the Holocaust-never-happened school, ask the obvious questions. If the answers aren't clear, the charges have not been proved. In Mr. Bacque's case, two such questions are: Where are the bodies? and Is this book consistent with our picture of Eisenhower's character as we know it from innumberable other sources? Ultimately, in cases such as this one, it is often the obvious questions that bring us closest to the truth.


    Post-World War I Germany yields two significant examples of the  effective use of nonviolence. In 1920, a pro-monarchist faction led by Dr. Wolfgang Kapp attempted to seize control of the Weimar government. German generals, sympathetic to the coup, refused to assist the civilian government, and many police actively sided with Kapp's forces. In response, President Theodor Ebert called a general strike and bureaucratic non-cooperation. While the military eventually came to the aid of the elected government, nonviolent resistance acted as the chief obstacle to Kapp's seizure of power.

    A  second  instance of the use of nonviolence came during the so-called Ruhrkampf  from 1923 to 1925. When Germany defaulted on its war reparation payments, French and Belgian troops entered the Ruhr -- one of Germany's chief industrial centers -- to extract the payments by force. Strikes and civilian and bureaucratic obstruction made the occupation so costly that the French and Belgians withdrew without net gain.

    … some of  the most famous cases of nonviolent resistance were carried out against foreign powers: colonial North America and India against the British [[would British government agree that it was a “foreign power”]]; Germany against France and Belgium in the Ruhrkampf; and Hungary against the rule of the Austrian Empire.



    Humane Studies Review Volume 9, Number 1   Summer 1994
    THE LITERATURE OF NONVIOLENT RESISTANCE AND CIVILIAN-BASED DEFENSE
    by Bryan Caplan

    … one neglected but useful perspective comes from the  tradition of   nonviolent resistance. While almost exclusively associated with Gandhi,   the idea  has a long history of theory and practice. This bibliographic essay  outlines the  contours of this tradition, beginning with its roots in the more general  theory of   resistance to tyranny; it then explores the theory and practice of nonviolent  resistance and its implications for classical liberal social theory.

    ***Resistance Thought:  Violent and Nonviolent

    An excellent survey of the history of theories justifying resistance  to tyranny is   Oscar Jszi and John D. Lewis, "Against the Tyrant: The Tradition and   Theory of  Tyrannicide" (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1957). While it focuses on the  question of  tyrannicide, it actually covers a much wider ground. Unsurprisingly, the  concepts of   tyranny and justified resistance to authority simultaneously arose in   ancient Greece.  Plato and Aristotle discussed tyranny without commenting on the  permissibility of  resistance to the state, but the histories of Xenophon and Herodotus  openly   sympathized with instances of tyrannicide. Romans also considered tyrannicide.  Cicero, Plutarch, Seneca, and Polybius explicitly endorsed it.  Presumably, they would  have endorsed less drastic resistance to authority as well. Christian  philosophers   such as Thomas Aquinas and William of Ockham endorsed a limited right to   resistance against tyranny. Finally, during the Italian Renaissance, the   revival of  classical authors led to a parallel revival of interest in the right of  resistance against  unjust government.

    The question of resistance appeared in its modern form and won  profound  practical significance during the Protestant Reformation. While Martin  Luther and  John Calvin denied the right of resistance in any form, their  intellectual heirs --  especially Calvin's -- questioned the doctrine that all "powers that be  are ordained of God" (Romans 13:1) and considered justifications for rebellion against  political and  religious persecution.

    British Calvinists radicalized first. John Ponet,  successively  Bishop of Rochester and of Winchester, defended resistance and  tyrannicide in his  book "A Shorte Treatise of Politike Power" (1556; reprinted in Winthrop  S. Hudson,  "John Ponet" (1516?-1556), Advocate of Limited Monarchy [Chicago: University of  Chicago Press, 1942]). The Scottish Calvinist John Knox turned radically  against passive resistance and defended the right to establish the true religion  by force if  necessary. Knox's English compatriot Christopher Goodman took a similar  line. 

    Franois Hotman's "Francogallia" (1573; trans. J. H. M. Salmon and ed.  Ralph E.  Giesey, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1972; Julian H. Franklin,  trans. and  ed., "Constitutionalism and Resistance in the Sixteenth Century: Three  Treatises by   Hotman, Beza, and Mornay" [New York: Pegasus, 1969], 47-96) initiated the  genre of  French Calvinist resistance -- or "monarchomach" -- literature. In it he  argued that   historically, the French monarch had been limited, subject to both   election and  deposition by the people. "It has been sufficiently demonstrated, we  believe,"  Hotman concludes in the third edition, "that the kings of France have not  been   granted unmeasured and unlimited power by their countrymen, and cannot be   considered absolute" ("Constitutionalism and Resistance," 90).

    Theodore Beza's "Right of Magistrates" (1574; "Constitutionalism and  Resistance," 97-135) gave this historical critique a firmer theoretical background. 

    Fearing   individual rebellion, he gave special weight to the right of lesser   magistrates to rebel  against a tyrant. He countenanced individual rebellion only against  tyrants without  legitimate titles -- but, only if the resistance of lesser magistrates  failed.

    Philippe du   Plessis-Mornay, in his "Defence of Liberty Against Tyrants" (1579;   "Constitutionalism and Resistance," 137-99) essentially drew the same  conclusions,  emphasizing that the people, not the king, are properly the owners of the kingdom.  Julian Franklin has abridged and commented upon all three works in his Constitutionalism and Resistance. Franklin emphasizes that the Calvinist  resistance   literature needed to avoid radical conclusions to convince moderate Catholics to join the Huguenot cause. Quentin Skinner's "The Foundations of Modern   Political  Thought," vol. 2, "The Age of Reformation" (New York: Cambridge  University  Press, 1978) contains an extensive discussion of Hotman, Beza, and  Mornay, as well  as lesser-known Calvinist authors and comments on their Lutheran,   Catholic  Scholastic, and humanist predecessors. For a general treatment of Huguenot  thought, see Michael Walzer, "The Revolution of the Saints" (New York:  Atheneum,
    1965).

    The radical Calvinists' interest in the right of resistance spread to  broader religious circles.

    The humanist thinker George Buchanan defended the right to  resist tyranny   not on partisan religious grounds but on the basis of social contract theory and  Aristotle's politics."Powers of the Crown of Scotland" (1579; trans. C.  F. Arrowood,  Austin: Texas University Press, 1949) is his most famous book; I. D.  McFarlane, in   his "Buchanan" (London: Duckworth, 1981), offers a more detailed   treatment of his  thought. At the same time, Catholics like Juan de Mariana and Francisco Surez validated the right of resistance against tyranny. Using state of nature  theory and the idea that rulers' power is delegated rather than inherent, both of these Jesuit  thinkers justified some form of the right of resistance. Surez stood behind the classical distinction between the usurper and the tyrant-by-conduct.  While it was   permissible to use violence against a usurper, such could be justified against a  tyrant-by-conduct in only the most extreme situations. Mariana took a more extreme view; he bypassed the dichotomy between the two types of unjust rulers and argued for every individual's right to kill a tyrant. Most of Surez's thought on resistance is in his "Tractatus de legibus" (1612; translated in   "Selections from Three  Works of Francisco Surez" [New York: Oxford University Press, 1944]).  Mariana's   chief work in this area is "The King and the Education of the King"  (1599; ed. and  trans. George Albert Moore, Washington, DC: Country Dollar Press, 1948).

    It should be emphasized that the monarchomachs chiefly justified  resistance as  such, rather than nonviolent resistance. Their principal contemporary  critics are  Jean Bodin and William Barclay.

    See Bodin, "On Sovereignty: Four Chapters  from  'The Six Books of the Commonwealth’ and Barclay, "The Kingdom and  the   Regal Power". Both  argue that this was more likely to lead to endless bloodshed and further  tyranny  than anything else.

    In this context, Etienne de La Boetie's "Discourse on  Voluntary   Servitude" (1577; trans. Harry Kurz, 1942; reprinted as "The Politics of  Obedience:  'The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude'" [New York: Free Life Editions,  1975]) appeared, promoting the efficacy of nonviolent resistance. Anticipating  David   Hume's "Of the First Principles of Government" (1777; reprinted as   "Essays, Moral,  Political, and Literary", ed. Eugene F. Miller, rev. ed.[Indianapolis:  Liberty Classics,  1987], 32-36), La Boetie saw that the rule of a tiny minority over  society was possible only if the majority voluntarily accepted it.

    Taking it one step further, La Boetie argued that the social consensus theory implied that it could overthrow tyranny peaceably if the majority withdrew its consent. "It is therefore," he wrote, "the inhabitants themselves who permit, or, rather, bring about their own subjection, since by ceasing to submit they would put an end to their servitude" (La  Boetie, 50). 

    While La Boetie's arguments for mass civil disobedience seem more moderate than  the Huguenot justification for violent resistance, he is, in every other  respect, far  more radical. All tyrants, he argued, whether by inheritance, force of arms, or  elections, are equally bad and, therefore, equally permissible to resist.  Perhaps most  significant, La Boetie justified resistance not through custom or  national tradition  but because "freedom is our natural state" (La Boetie, 57).

    La Boetie explained the oppressed state of mankind with a theory of ideology and caste exploitation. The  former, he contended, suppresses humanity's natural urge for freedom; the latter develops as a tyrant fortifies power by privileging a pyramid of followers.

    Despite the originality of La Boetie's theory, it exerted little  influence on  subsequent theorists who continued to equate resistance with violence.  Thus, the  three pillars of seventeenth-century British resistance theory -- Locke,  Sidney, and  Milton -- focused chiefly on violent revolution. John Locke, in his  "Essay  concerning Civil Government," the second of the "Two Treatises of  Government"  (1689; student ed., ed. Peter Laslett, New York: Cambridge University  Press, 1988),  not only justified rebellion against tyranny but also assumed that physical force  existed as the necessary means to subdue a tyrant. While more moderate  than Locke  on many questions, Algernon Sidney in his "Discourses concerning  Government"  (1698; reprint, ed. Thomas G. West, Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1990)  militantly  advocated violent revolution against tyrants. And John Milton in his book  "The  Tenure of Kings and Magistrates" (1649; reprinted in "Political  Writings," ed. Martin  Dzelzainis [New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991], 1-48), defended  the right of  the people to execute a tyrant if the established watchdogs failed to  manage him  effectively.

    The nineteenth century produced two significant theorists of  nonviolent  resistance: Henry David Thoreau and Count Leo Tolstoy.

    In Thoreau's   famous essay  "Civil Disobedience" (1849; reprinted in "On Civil Disobedience: American  Essays,  Old and New,' ed. Robert A. Goldwin [Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969],  11-31), he  argued that the individual had a moral duty to resist unjust acts of   government.  While not primarily a work on collective action, Thoreau noted that "[i]f  the  alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and  slavery, the State  will not hesitate which to choose. . . . When the subject has refused  allegiance, and  the officer has resigned his office, then the revolution is accomplished"  ("On Civil   Disobedience," 21). One can find Tolstoy's arguments on nonviolence in the compilation  "Tolstoy's  Writings on Civil Disobedience and Non-Violence" (New York: Bergman,  1967).   Unlike Thoreau, who largely treated his conclusions as simply the   consistent  application of Jeffersonian principles, Tolstoy based his condemnations  of violence  on the philosophy presented in the New Testament. His most notable essays  on the  issue of non-violence include "Patriotism, or Peace?" which argued that  the general  renunciation of patriotism was a precondition of international peace and  his "Notes  for Officers" and "Notes for Soldiers", which argued that members of the  military  had a duty to resign their posts and obey their consciences rather than the state. For  more on Tolstoy's political thought, see his "The Law of Violence  and the Law of Love" (New York: Rudolph Field, 1948), in which he  favorably cited  the work of La Boetie on the efficacy of nonviolent struggle against  tyranny.

    Tolstoy's "A Letter to a Hindu: The Subjection of India -- Its Cause  and Cure" in  "Tolstoy Centenary Edition," vol. 21, "Recollections and Essays" (New  York: Oxford  University Press, 1937) significantly influenced the twentieth-century's  preeminent   exponent of nonviolence, Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi began his lifetime   interest in  nonviolence when, as a lawyer in South Africa, he used nonviolence to  help repeal  governmental discrimination against the Indian minority. He later  acquired world   fame for his leadership of the nonviolent struggle for Indian independence from  the British. One can find a good sampling of Gandhi's writings in his "Non-Violent  Resistance (Satyagraha)" (New York: Schocken Books, 1951). While Gandhi's advocacy of nonviolence was chiefly religious and deontological, he also  defended  its practicality. Not only will nonviolence win more public support than  violence,   he argued, but it also has a greater chance to convert one's opponents   and succeed  with minimal casualties. In a typical passage, Gandhi wrote that a "civil  resister  never uses arms and hence is harmless to a State that is at all willing  to listen to the  voice of public opinion. He is dangerous for an autocratic state, for he  brings about  its fall by engaging public opinion upon the matter for which he resists  the State"  (Gandhi, 174). Elsewhere, echoing La Boetie, Gandhi stated that in "politics, its  [power's] use is based upon the immutable maxim that government of the  people is possible only so long as they consent either consciously or unconsciously  to be  governed"
    (Gandhi, 35).

    Gandhi makes for difficult reading because he mixed religious ideas  with more practical observations. Gene Sharp does a good job of disentangling these  two strains  in his "Gandhi as a Political Strategist" (Boston: Porter Sargent, 1979).  If one ignores  Gandhi's religious views and focuses on his discussion of practical strategic questions, one finds a shrewd and insightful thinker in the tradition of La Boetie.  Several of Sharp's interpretive essays -- especially "Gandhi on the  Theory of  Voluntary Servitude" -- bring together the bits and pieces of Gandhi's  theory of  nonviolent resistance. For further writings on Gandhi's philosophy which  emphasize his mystical side, see Raghavan N. Iyer, "The Moral and  Political  Thought of Mahatma Gandhi"
    ***Nonviolent Resistance:  Theory and History

    There can be little doubt that today's foremost thinker sympathetic to  nonviolent resistance is Gene Sharp. With an eye toward practical strategy rather  than   philosophy, his major work "The Politics of Nonviolent Action" (Boston:  Porter  Sargent, 1973) covers virtually every aspect of the theory and history of  nonviolent  resistance to government. In the opening of the book, Sharp carefully  crafts his   arguments as an extensive discussion of the nature of power. He draws on   the long  tradition of thinkers who argue that ideology and consent -- whether  grudging or  enthusiastic -- rather than brute force are the ultimate basis of  political power. If a large enough segment of the population refuses to comply with the government, it will lose its ability to rule. Merely the threat of non-compliance is  often serious  enough to provoke the government to redress grievances. Moreover, when  governments use violence against protesters who are clearly committed to  nonviolence, they undermine their ideological foundations and often make  uncontested rule even more difficult. He cites such diverse thinkers as  Auguste Comte, Etienne de La Boetie, David Hume, Gaetano Mosca, Bertrand de  Jouvenel, Max Weber, Jeremy Bentham, Montesquieu, and Niccol Machiavelli.

    Sharp distinguishes between three stages of nonviolence: protest and  persuasion;   social, economic, and political non-cooperation; and nonviolent  intervention.   Normally a movement begins with the first stage and gradually escalates   until the  government meets its demands or agrees to compromise. As examples of  protest  and persuasion Sharp lists public speeches, petitions, distribution of  literature,   public demonstrations, and fraternizing with low-ranking soldiers and   other  government enforcers.

    Nonviolent resisters bring more serious sanctions to bear when they resort to  social, economic, and political non-cooperation. Here Sharp offers as  examples social boycott, excommunication, student strikes (social non-cooperation);  consumers'  boycotts, workers' strikes, refusal to pay fees, rent, or interest,  refusal to accept a  government's money (economic non-cooperation); and the boycott of legislative bodies and elections, draft resistance, tax resistance, deliberate  bureaucratic  inefficiency, and mutiny (political non-cooperation). Unlike protest and persuasion, many of these tactics could pressure a government into changing its policies without actually changing anyone's mind.

    Sharp's final category, nonviolent intervention, includes the most  radical forms of resistance against authority. Some examples include fasting until death   (Gandhi's  famed tactic), sit-ins, occupying or surrounding critical government  buildings,  blocking of roads, setting up alternative markets and transportation  systems (such as  black markets), overloading administrative systems, and forming a  parallel  government.

    Sharp documents a number of examples for each category. While not all  of them   have met with success, the historical effectiveness of nonviolent action   is  surprising. One familiar but neglected example is colonial resistance to  Britain  before the American Revolution from 1765 to 1775. For further details on  the  nonviolent stage of colonial resistance, see Edmund S. Morgan and Helen  M.   Morgan, "The Stamp Act Crisis: Prologue to Revolution" (New York: Collier  Books,  1963); Lawrence Henry Gipson, "The British Empire Before the American Revolution" (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1961-1965); Arthur Schlesinger,  "The  Colonial Merchants and the American Revolution" (New York: Frederick  Ungar,   1966); Lawrence Henry Gipson, "The Coming of the American Revolution"  (New  York: Harper Torchbooks, 1962); and Murray Rothbard, "Conceived in  Liberty," vol.   3, "Advance to Revolution, 1760-1775" (New Rochelle, NY: Arlington House,  1976).  The famous boycotts of tea and other British imports, refusal to pay  taxes such as  those required by the Stamp Act, and ostracism of the Tories imposed  serious costs  upon the British government, leading to desperate action to preserve  British  authority in the colonies. Fewer works on later American tax resistance  exist. See,  however, Dall W. Forsythe's "Taxation and Political Change in the Young  Nation, 1781-1833" (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977), and James Ring  Adams,   "Secrets of the Tax Revolt" (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1984),  both of  which David T. Beito discusses at length in 'Tax Revolts in American  History,'  "Humane Studies Review" 4 (Winter 1986-87). Beito's major work in this  area,   "Taxpayers in Revolt: Tax Resistance during the Great Depression" (Chapel  Hill:  University of North Carolina Press, 1989), offers a broad discussion of  the largest tax  rebellion in modern America; he emphasizes the tax resistance in Chicago  during   the New Deal era.

    Post-World War I Germany yields two significant examples of the  effective use of nonviolence. In 1920, a pro-monarchist faction led by Dr. Wolfgang Kapp attempted to seize control of the Weimar government. German generals, sympathetic  to the coup, refused to assist the civilian government, and many police actively sided with Kapp's forces. In response, President Theodor Ebert called a general strike and bureaucratic non-cooperation. While the military eventually came to the aid of the elected government, nonviolent resistance acted as the chief obstacle to Kapp's  seizure of power.

    For more details on the Kapp putsch, see Erich Eyck, "A  History of   the Weimar Republic" (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962).

    A   second  instance of the use of nonviolence came during the so-called Ruhrkampf  from 1923 to 1925. When Germany defaulted on its war reparation payments, French and Belgian troops entered the Ruhr -- one of Germany's chief industrial  centers -- to extract the payments by force. Strikes and civilian and bureaucratic obstruction made the occupation so costly that the French and Belgians withdrew without net gain. 

    Wolfgang Sternstein, 'The Ruhrkampf of 1923: Economic Problems of  Civilian   Defense,' in "Civilian Resistance as a National Defense," ed. Adam   Roberts  (Harrisburg, PA: Stockpole Books, 1968) discusses the Ruhrkampf instance at great  length.

    We must turn back to the Indian struggle for independence from Great  Britain, the   most famous and successful twentieth-century nonviolent movement. While   Indian independence quickly sparked ethnic violence and failed to deliver   prosperity and freedom to ordinary Indians and Pakistanis, the struggle   compares  favorably to violent colonial outbreaks such as in Algeria. Sharp  estimates that if  one takes India's population into account, Algerian-level casualties  would have left   India with three million to three and a half million people dead. The number of  Indians actually killed while taking part in nonviolence was about eight  thousand. (See Sharp, "Gandhi as a Political Strategist," 7.) 

    Indians tried virtually every nonviolent tactic -- tax resistance (such as the famous salt march), boycotts of British  goods, failure to support the British war effort, and fasting -- during the independence movement. For more details on the history of the Indian struggle with the British, see Michael Edwardes, "The Last Years of British India"  (London:  Cassell, 1963); Ram Gopal, "How India Struggled for Freedom: A Political  History"  (Bombay: Book Centre, 1967); Francis Hutchins, "India's Revolution:   Gandhi and  the Quit India Movement" (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973);  and  R.P. Masani, "British in India: An Account of British Rule in the Indian  Subcontinent" (New York: Oxford University Press, 1960).

    The most famous nonviolent struggle in recent American history has been the  civil rights movement. A few of the many histories of the combat for legal equality  for blacks -- fought largely with nonviolent tactics -- are: Arthur I.  Waskow, "From  Race Riot to Sit-in: 1919 and the 1960's" (Garden City, NY: Doubleday,  1966); James  Farmer, "Freedom -- When?" (New York: Random House, 1954); and Alan F.  Westin, ed., "Freedom Now: The Civil-Rights Struggle in America" (New  York:   Basic Books, 1964). Martin Luther King Jr.'s theories of nonviolent   resistance should  not be overlooked. Besides 'Letter from the Birmingham Jail' (Goldwin,  ed., "On  Civil Disobedience", 61-77), King's other works on nonviolence and the civil rights   movement include "Stride Toward Freedom: The Montgomery Story" (New York: Ballantine Books, 1958) and "Why We Can't Wait" (New York: New American  Library, 1964). For a broader look at the struggle of black Americans,  most of it  nonviolent, see Joan Grant, ed., "Black Protest: History, Documents, and  Analyses,   1619 to the Present" (Greenwich, CT: Fawcett, 1968); Carleton Mabee,   "Black  Freedom: The Nonviolent Abolitionists from 1830 Through the Civil War"  (New  York: Macmillan, 1977); and John Hope Franklin, "From Slavery to  Freedom," 6th  ed. (New York: Knopf, 1988).

    Sharp lists many historical examples of both nonviolent struggles and  violent  struggles with a large nonviolent component. His examples include:  Hungarian resistance to the Austrian empire from 1850 to 1867; the Belgian  suffragist enlargement strikes in 1893, 1902, and 1913; Finland's opposition to  Russian rule from 1898 to 1905; and the Russian Revolution of 1905 and 1906.  Anti-colonial struggles in Asia and Africa were also often nonviolent.  They included China's boycotts against the Japanese between 1906 and 1919; the struggle of the Indian minority in South Africa against discrimination from 1906 to 1914 and again in 1946;  and Samoan resistance against New Zealand from 1919 to 1936.

    See Gene   Sharp,  "Social Power and Political Freedom" (Boston: Porter Sargent, 1980) for a  comprehensive list. Sharp finds a common pattern throughout the history of nonviolent  resistance.   After a movement for social change acquires any sort of influence, it   typically meets with repression. While badly organized movements collapse as soon as resistance begins, the inculcation of solidarity and discipline (akin in some ways   to the training  of normal soldiers) can hold a movement together long enough to win  attention  and score some victories. Moreover, the very fact that the protesters  remain   committed to nonviolence even as the government turns to repression to   combat  them tends to win over previously neutral parties, arouse dissent among the  repressing group, and inspire and involve other members of persecuted  groups.  Sharp refers to this as "political jiu-jitsu" -- jiu-jitsu being a style  of martial art that  uses an opponent's aggressiveness and ferocity against him. Sharp is far  from a  Panglossian advocate of nonviolence; indeed, it is precisely because of  the possibility   of failure that he is interested in studying the mechanics of nonviolent   struggle.  But, insofar as it succeeds, it usually does so by converting opponents,  making  repression too costly to continue, and threatening the very ability of  the   government to maintain power.

    END PART ONE

    Humane Studies Review Volume 9, Number 1   Summer 1994
    THE LITERATURE OF NONVIOLENT RESISTANCE AND CIVILIAN-BASED DEFENSE
    by Bryan Caplan

    PART TWO

    Among Sharp's other works in the area of nonviolence are "Exploring  Nonviolent Alternatives" (Boston: Porter Sargent, 1971); "Social Power  and Political  Freedom: Making Europe Unconquerable" (London: Taylor and Francis, 1985);  "National Security Through Civilian-Based Defense" (Omaha, NE:  Association for  Transarmament Studies, 1985); and "Civilian-Based Defense: A  Post-Military   Weapons System" (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990). These   books  overlap one another to a significant extent, but, taken together, they detail the  benefits of nonviolent action as a substitute for violence. Sharp  generally utilizes a comparative institutions approach. For example, he compares the  effectiveness of   real-world violence to real-world nonviolence rather than ideal violence   to real- world nonviolence as critics often do. As Sharp puts it, "Comparative  evaluations of  nonviolent and violent means must take into consideration that political  violence   is often defeated also. By conventional standards, does not one side lose   in each  international war, civil war and violent revolution? Such defeats have  usually been  explained as resulting from certain weaknesses or inadequacies, such as  lack of   fighting spirit, insufficient or poor weapons, mistakes in strategy and   tactics, or numerical inferiority. Comparable weaknesses may also lead to defeat in  nonviolent  action. The common practice of explaining defeats of political violence  in terms of  such specific shortcomings while blaming defeats of nonviolent action on  the   presumption of its universal impotence is both irrational and uninformed"  (Sharp,  "The Politics of Nonviolent Action," p. 756).

    With this in mind, he first notes that violence is usually ineffective. The ability of  the government to use violence greatly exceeds that of the rebels.  Indeed, violent  rebellion often strengthens oppressive regimes which can plausibly claim  that rebel  violence necessitates repression. Government's comparative advantage lies in violent action. The comparative advantage of the people, in contrast, lies in their ability to deny their voluntary cooperation without which it is nearly impossible for  government to persist. Consider the deadliness to a government of tax strikes, boycotts, general strikes, and widespread refusal to obey the law. While these tactics are nonviolent, their universal and unyielding use should terrify any government.

    Nonviolence has other advantages as well. Because it seems less  dangerous and   radical than violence, it more easily, as mentioned above, wins broad   public  support. The costs of participation are lower, so more people are likely  to participate.  Traditional noncombatants like children, women, and the old can  effectively   participate in nonviolent struggle. It is more likely to convert   opponents and  produce internal disagreement within the ruling class. It generally leads  to far fewer  casualties and material losses than violence. And since it is more decentralized than  violent action, it is less likely to give rise to an even more oppressive  state if it  succeeds.

    In addition to Sharp's impressive and far-reaching "Politics of  Nonviolent   Action," one should examine other works, including Richard B. Gregg's   "The Power  of Nonviolence" (New York: Fellowship Publications, 1944), which combines  a  theoretical discussion with a partial history of Gandhi's struggle for  Indian   independence. Gregg's theoretical approach is roughly equivalent to   Sharp's -- albeit  in a less detailed systematic form. A. Paul Hare and Herbert H. Blumberg's  "Liberation Without Violence: A Third-Party Approach" (Totowa, NJ: Rowman  and Littlefield, 1977) offers a collection of largely historical essays on  the use of   nonviolence in India, the United States, Africa, and Cyprus. V.K. Kool,   ed.,  "Perspectives on Nonviolence"
    (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990) collects  thirty essays on various topics relating to nonviolence, including a  keynote address  by Kenneth Boulding. Leroy Pelton, in "The Psychology of Nonviolence"  (New   York: Pergamon, 1974), takes a psychological approach, focusing on the   ability of  nonviolent resistance to change minds while avoiding a vicious spiral of  escalating  violence.

    ***Civilian Based Defense

    If nonviolent action can effectively force one's government to change  its policies  or abandon power, then plausibly similar tactics might succeed against a  foreign  invader. And, since most nonviolence has historically been sporadic and  unorganized, it might bepossible to increase its effectiveness through  training and   strategic and tactical planning. These two possibilities have sparked   interest in  "civilian-based defense" -- the self-conscious use of nonviolent means  for the goal of  national defense. Sharp defines civilian-based defense as "a projected  refinement of  the general technique of nonviolent action, or civilian struggle, as it has occurred  widely in improvised forms in the past. This policy is an attempt  deliberately to adapt and develop that technique to meet defense needs, and thereby  potentially to  provide... deterrence to those particular forms of attack" (Sharp,  "Social Power and  Political Freedom," p. 233).

    While this may appear intuitively impractical at first, on closer  examination the   argument may have strong appeal.  From the outset, one should note that  some of  the most famous cases of nonviolent resistance were carried out against foreign powers: colonial North America and India against the British; Germany against France and Belgium in the Ruhrkampf; and Hungary against the rule of the Austrian Empire.

    Quoting Kenneth Boulding, Sharp writes "What exists, is possible." More fundamentally, nonviolent resistance never had any of the advantages that military resistance does. Usually the military has years to train, strategize, prepare arsenals, test weapons, stockpile necessary resources, and study the past for lessons. But, nonviolent struggles have almost always been  carried out  without the benefit of personnel training or tactical and strategic  planning. What would happen if countries spent as much energy preparing for a nonviolent struggle as they do for a military struggle? This is a question that  Sharp and other authors sympathetic to civilian-based defense have tried to answer.

    As with most scholarship on nonviolence, the work of Gene Sharp  dominates the   area of civilian-based defense. "Social Power and Political Freedom," a  collection of  essays on topics relating to nonviolence, contains two well-written  introductory   essays to the theory of civilian-based defense: "The Political   Equivalent of War' --  Civilian-Based Defense,"and "Popular Empowerment.""The Political  Equivalent of   War," criticizes traditional solutions to the problem of war: removing   its "causes,";  pacifism and unilateral disarmament; world government; and negotiated  general  disarmament.

    He also discusses the history of nonviolence, with examples  from the Montgomery boycotts, the Soviet prison camp resistance at Vorkuta, and German and Norwegian opposition to Nazi policies.

    These introductory examples provide a springboard for an extensive  discussion of civilian-based defense. Sharp insists that deterrents are not limited to  standard   military ones. Rather, it is merely necessary for nonviolence to make   occupation so  difficult that the costs of conquest exceed the benefits. Massive tax  resistance,  boycotts, incitement of desertion, and strikes might accomplish this.  And, if a would-be conqueror realized that nonviolent techniques might make the  costs of  occupation skyrocket, he might be deterred from trying. Sharp considers  specific  ways to prepare effective civilian-based defense: general education and training in  the techniques of nonviolence, as well as a "West Point" for training  specialists; the wide-spread dissemination of publishing and broadcasting equipment to  prevent   invaders from seizing all of the means of communication; and  local   stockpiles  should exist to ease the pain of a general strike. Lastly, Sharp  considers questions of  strategy. He contrasts a "nonviolent Blitzkrieg" -- a policy of total  non-cooperation, a  general strike, and massive protests -- with the less dramatic but more  sustainable  "selective resistance" -- targeting specific institutions for protection  and defense and   certain enemy policies for defiance and protest.

    "Popular Empowerment" offers another telling point. While standard  military   defense is easy for a government to use against its own people,  civilian-based   defense is not. Civilian-based defense is a positive check against the abuse of power.  If the government acts improperly, the same techniques that the citizenry  can wield against foreigners can be turned on its own leaders. National defense, properly understood, shields society from all oppression, both foreign and domestic.

    "Making Europe Unconquerable" was Sharp's attempt to apply his theory  of civilian-based defense to the protection of Western Europe against a Soviet  invasion. While the subject is perhaps passe, the work is useful because  it   investigates a fairly specific issue in detail. Moreover, those who   doubted the efficacy  of nonviolence against the Soviets may find it a more plausible tool  against the less  serious threats that European nations face today. "Exploring Nonviolent  Alternatives," one of Sharp's shorter pieces, applies the analysis to  the question of national defense. "National Security Through  Civilian-Based   Defense," a long pamphlet, does nearly the same. "Civilian-Based   Defense," Sharp's  most recent book, summarizes his lifetime of scholarly research on  nonviolence. It  also contains fascinating treatments of the use of nonviolence in the  final   overthrow of communism in EasternEurope. Short, clear, and wide-ranging,   "Civilian-Based Defense" is the best single piece to read on the topic.

    Some of the most interesting scholarship on civilian-based defense by  authors   other than Sharp appears in Roberts, ed., "Civilian Resistance as a   National  Defence." Notable essays include Sir Basil Liddell Hart's "Lessons from  Resistance  Movements -- Guerrilla and Nonviolent"; Theodor Ebert's "Nonviolent  Resistance   Against Communist Regimes?"; Jeremy Bennett's "The Resistance Against the  German Occupation of Denmark 1940-5"; Magne Skodvin, "Norwegian  Nonviolent  Resistance During the German Occupation"; and Wolfgang Sternstein, "The  Ruhrkampf of 1923: Economic Problems of Civilian Defense." One should also see  T.K. Mahadevan, Adam Roberts, and Gene Sharp, eds., "Civilian Defense: An Introduction" (New Delhi: Gandhi Peace Foundation, 1967).

    For other books on civilian-based defense, see Sir Stephen King-Hall,  "Defence in  the Nuclear Age" (London: Victor Gollancz, 1958), which argues that  Britain should  unilaterally give up its nuclear weapons stockpile, since the possession  of nuclear  weapons makes Britain a more likely target for a hostile nuclear attack;  he   recommends civilian-based defense. Norman Freund, in "Nonviolent National  Defense: A Philosophical Inquiry into Applied Nonviolence" (New York:  University Press of America, 1987), summarizes many of the main arguments  for civilian-based defense, as does Krishnalal Shridharani, "War Without  Violence: A  Study of Gandhi's Methods and Its Accomplishments" (New York: Garland,  1972). A  Quaker organization, the American Friends Service Committee, defended   civilian- based defense in "In Place of War: An Inquiry into Nonviolent National  Defense" (New York: Grossman Publishers, 1967). Anders Boserup and Andrew  Mack, "War Without Weapons" (New York: Schocken Books, 1975), overlaps  with  Sharp's work; its main innovation is its explicit attempt to integrate  the theory of   nonviolence with classical strategic theory as formulated by Clauswitz. In so doing,  Boserup and Mack open the door for the application of both rational  choice and game theories to the question of nonviolence.

    **"It Can Only Work Against the British" -- Nonviolence against  Totalitarian  Regimes

    Almost everyone will concede that nonviolence can work against  "civilized"  nations. But what about the hard cases? What about totalitarian governments   utterly lacking in moral scruples and prepared to kill as many people as   necessary to cement their rule? Intuitively, the case against nonviolence in such  circumstances is  strong. Yet preliminary research into the history of nonviolent  resistance against Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia casts doubt on this intuition. While nonviolence may be less useful against amoral or immoral tyrants, it is far from futile.

    Danish, Norwegian, and Dutch resistance to Nazism from 1940 to 1945  was  pronounced and fairly successful. In Norway, for example, teachers refused to  promote fascism in the schools. For this, the Nazis imprisoned a thousand  teachers.  But, the remaining teachers stood firm, giving anti-fascist instruction  to children and teaching in their homes. This policy made the pro-fascist Quisling  government  so unpopular that it eventually released all of the imprisoned teachers  and dropped its attempt to dominate the schools. Other forms of struggle included ostracism, the refusal to speak to Nazi soldiers and intense social hostility to  collaborationists.

    Nonviolent struggle in the Netherlands was also fierce. The Dutch organized two general strikes in Amsterdam; one in 1941 protested mistreatment of Jews,  and a second in 1943 opposed the Nazi plan to intern Dutch war veterans in  Germany. In Copenhagen, Danes used a general strike to liberalize martial law.

    Gene Sharp's   sources include Jeremy Bennett, "The Resistance Against the German   Occupation of  Denmark 1940-5," in Roberts, pp. 154-172; Magne Skodvin, "Norwegian  Nonviolent  Resistance During the German Occupation," in Roberts, pp. 136-153; Bjarne  H�ye   and Trygve M. Ager, "The Fight of the Norwegian Church Against Nazism"  (New  York: Macmillan, 1943); and Werner Warmbrunn, "The Dutch Under German  Occupation 1940-1945" (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1963). For a  general treatment of resistance to Nazism, see International Conference on the History of  the Resistance Movements, "European Resistance Movements, 1939-1945  (Oxford:   Pergamon Press, 1960).

    But, surely the most amazing but widely neglected case of nonviolent  resistance  against Nazi Germany was the protection of Jews and other persecuted  minorities from deportation, imprisonment, and murder. In "The Lesson of Eichmann: A  Review-Essay on Hannah Arendt's Eichmann in Jerusalem" in "Social Power and Political Freedom," Gene Sharp shows how the nations which nonviolently resisted National Socialist racial persecutions saved almost all of their Jews,  while Jews in other Nazi-controlled nations were vastly more likely to be placed in concentration  camps and killed.

    The effort to arrest Norway's seventeen hundred Jews  sparked internal resistance and protest resignations; most of the Norwegian Jews fled to  Sweden. In Belgium, police refused to cooperate with the Germans, and  railroad  workers sabotaged trains transporting imprisoned Jews. Apparently no  Belgian Jews died at Nazi hands, and about half of all foreign Jews living in Belgium  survived occupation. While Vichy France helped deport foreign Jews, it refused to  cooperate in the deportation of French Jews; in consequence, eighty percent were saved.  Even though Italy was a German ally, Italians did not share Hitler's anti-Semitism. As a result of bureaucratic resistance and non-cooperation, ninety percent of Italian Jews were saved.

    When Himmler tried to crack down on Danish Jews, the Danes thwarted  his  efforts. Not only did the Danish government and people resist -- through  bureaucratic slowdowns and noncooperation -- but, surprisingly, the German  commander in Denmark also refused to help organize Jewish deportations.  This  prompted Himmler to import special troops to arrest Jews. But, in the end  almost all  Danish Jews escaped unharmed. In Bulgaria, the parliament refused to assist the German anti-Jewish measures, and Bulgarians held public demonstrations  against the persecution of Jews. As far as can be known, no Bulgarian Jews were killed or deported by the Nazis.

    For more on this, see Hannah Arendt, "Eichmann in  Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil" (New York: Viking Press,  1963).  The omnipresent pattern that Arendt finds and that Sharp emphasizes is that totalitarian governments are not omnipotent. They need the cooperation of  the ruled to exert their will. If a people denies cooperation, even a  government as vicious as Hitler's, bound by few moral constraints, might be unable to get what it   wants.

    The history of nonviolent struggle against the Soviet Union has, until  recently,   been much more bleak. When, in 1953, East Germans used the general strike   and  other nonviolent tactics to win better treatment for workers, the Soviets  brutally  crushed all opposition, leading to worldwide recognition -- even among  socialists --  that the Soviet regime's claim to represent "workers" was absurd. Stefan  Brant, "The  East German Rising" (New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1957) covers the  history of  the largely nonviolent 1953 struggle. The Hungarian uprising in 1956,  while  generally considered a military struggle, contained strong nonviolent elements,  including a general strike, mass demonstrations, and the formation of a  parallel government. Again, the Soviets harshly repressed it, though it is worth  noting that  the nonviolent resistance (for example the general strike in Budapest)   held out  longer than the Hungarian military. On this, see Ferenc Vali, "Rift and  Revolt in  Hungary: Nationalism versus Communism" (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University  Press, 1961) and George Mikes, "The Hungarian Revolution" (London: Andre  Deutsch, 1957).

    The Czech struggle of 1968 is a final tragic chapter in the history of  resistance to the Soviets. Remarkably, the Czechs used nonviolent means almost exclusively   and,  consequently, lasted considerably longer than did the Hungarians. The  Dubcek  government ordered its soldiers to remain in their barracks, the state  news agency   refused to announce that its government had "requested" the invasion, and  the  Czech Congress condemned Soviet actions and demanded a release of its  kidnapped  officials. Other forms of resistance included short-term general strikes,  transportation obstruction, and the use of radio to rally the people against Soviet  invaders. Even though the invasion was a complete military success, the  Soviets decided that the political situation made it unwise to replace the Dubcek  government with collaborators. Instead, after some compromise on reforms,  they   released the kidnapped Czech leaders and restored them to their previous   positions.  The liberal reformers retained power for eight more months, at which  point the  Russians replaced them with their own favorites. This ended Czech  reforms. On the   1968 struggle see Robert Littell, ed., "The Czech Black Book"
    (New York:   Frederick A.  Praeger, 1969); Robin Alison Remington, ed., "Winter in Prague" (Cambridge: MIT  Press, 1969); and Philip Windsor and Adam Roberts, "Czechoslovakia" 1968 (New  York: Columbia University Press, 1969).

    It would be easy to draw deeply pessimistic conclusions from this long  string of suppressed attempts to liberalize communist nations. Not only did history  support   the pessimistic conclusion of Jeane Kirkpatrick and other conservatives,   but it, a  priori, also made sense. Violent revolution in a totalitarian system  seemed futile.  The ruling elite might fight amongst itself, but they had no intention of  giving up  power voluntarily. And, nonviolence proved clearly useless against   conscienceless  dictators.

    Or did it? As Sharp emphasized, nonviolence can win by converting  opponents   and neutrals and by creating divisions within ruling groups. In a way,   that was  happening for decades under communism. Not only the people, but also  subgroups  within the ruling elite itself gradually came to see the evil and  inherent  contradictions within their own system. Circulation of illegal  literature, smuggled   videotapes, and infiltration of Western cultural influences slowly eroded   confidence. It is a mistake to look at communist nations over the   past few decades and conclude that all resistance had been crushed;   rather, it had  been occurring covertly, slowly undermining all of the claims of  communist  governments of legitimacy.

    The move for liberalization began with the Solidarity movement in  Poland. One   readable journalistic history of Solidarity is Timothy Garton Ash's, "The  Polish  Revolution: Solidarity 1980-1982" (London: Jonathan Cape, 1983). Ash  emphasizes   that the election of a Polish pope marked the beginning of rising   expectations in  Poland. By highlighting the role of non-state institutions, John Paul's  election  tended to make people more conscious of the distinction between society  and state.  Ash describes one of the pope's Polish appearances: "For nine days the  state virtually  ceased to exist, except as a censor doctoring the television coverage. Everyone saw  that Poland is not a communist country -- just a communist state" (Ash,p.  29).

    The   chief tactic of Solidarity was the strike, which it used both to   highlight particular grievances and to attain broader reform. Peter Raina's "Poland 1981:  Towards Social  Renewal" (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1985) details the history of  Solidarity's   tactics, demands, and compromises that critical year. The author analyzes   the precise  text of reform bills on independent trade unions, worker self-management,  censorship, and higher education. For a broader history, see Jadwiga  Staniaszkis,  "Poland's Self-Limiting Revolution" (Princeton: Princeton University  Press, 1984).  This work gives a solid account of the crucial 1980 through 1982 period  -- the height  of Solidarity's influence -- but it also discusses moderate reforms during the 70's, the  Polish people's rising expectations prior to Solidarity, and the early  period of Soviet  occupation after World War II.

    The Solidarity movement and student and peasant associations expressed  discontent and struggled for reform despite harsh persecution. Their  limited   successes inspired dissidents in other communist nations to push harder   for reform  and frightened communist leaders into mild compromises. One work  documenting  the spread of the "Polish virus" is Elizabeth Teague's "Solidarity and  the Soviet  Worker" (London: Croom Helm, 1988) which discusses the influence of the  Solidarity movement on Soviet politics. The Politburo clearly feared the  growth of  the ideas of the Solidarity movement and made concessions to workers in  the early   1980s to prevent this. While Teague found little Polish influence upon   ethnic  Russians, the Solidarity movement frequently influenced other ethnicities  within  the USSR to push peacefully for reforms in their own republics.

    Eventually the accumulated effects of resistance penetrated the Soviet  Politburo   itself. Gorbachev announced that Soviet forces would not quell reforms in   Eastern  Europe. At this point, the unself-conscious tactics of nonviolent  resistance went  public. A half million East Germans demonstrated in Berlin for democratic  elections   and civil liberties on 4 November 1989. A half million Czechs and Slovaks   protested  the phony reforms of communist bosses in Prague three weeks later.  Thousands of  protesters in Leipzig forced state security headquarters to submit to  public  inspection.

    As Sharp writes, repression often rebounded against the repressors:  "Czechs and Slovaks erected shrines at the main sites of the beatings,  raising those injured to the stature of heroes. Hundreds of thousands took to the  streets daily  following the police actions. As one student put it, the beatings were  �the spark that  started the whole movement'" (Sharp, "Civilian-Based Defense," pp.  58-59). Success  was contagious -- once East Germany's neighboring communist regimes fell,  the East  Germans began to flee to West Germany by way of their government's former  allies.  In the final chapter, communism within the Soviet Union itself collapsed,  and the  last-ditch attempt of hard-line communists to seize power was foiled with  no small  thanks to mass demonstrations, fraternization with soldiers, and other  nonviolent  tactics.

     While there has been some overlap between the classical liberal  tradition and the  theory and practice of nonviolent struggle, they remain virtual strangers  to one  another in scholarship. There is, however, no intrinsic reason for this.  While  nonviolence is compatible with many viewpoints, some of the best  arguments in its   favor have a rather classical liberal flavor. The analysis of political   power and civil  obedience put forth by nonviolence theorists closely resembles classical  liberalism.  Similarly, the observation that violent revolution often serves only the  interests of  a new elite fits comfortably into the classical liberal tradition. The nonviolence  literature contains few explicit references to spontaneous order, but the  idea is often  present nonetheless, especially in Gene Sharp's work. The idiom of the  nonviolence literature is initially foreign, but frequently it is a difference  chiefly of style, not of  substance.

    Classical liberals interested in the issue of nonviolence will find  several gaps in  the existing literature waiting to be filled. First of all, the notion of  spontaneous  order in general, along with rational choice and game theories, rarely  appears. But,  these tools could shed considerable light on the feasibility of  nonviolence; they  might also help answer the objection that centrally planned resistance is  necessarily  more effective than civilian-based defense. Second, classical liberals  may be able to   draw on a broader range of historical examples than the current  literature does. The  self-conscious resistance movements are its primary focus; but aren't  there many  voluntary institutions whose result is to check state power even though  that is no  part of the intention of the participants?

    Thus, the informal economy is rarely a  form of ideological protest, but it is nevertheless a decentralized and  nonviolent  check upon the abuse of governmental power. A third insight that classical liberals might introduce and expand is the role of markets and economic freedom as a nonviolent check upon the state. Since contemporary advocates of  nonviolence   tend to be suspicious of capitalism, they often ignore typically liberal   observations. Classical liberals may learn from -- as well as contribute to -- the  nonviolence  literature. Besides its intrinsic interest, it may point the way to  answers to several  difficult issues within the classical liberal tradition. Despite their  distrust of state  power and interventionist foreign policy, classical liberals have had a  difficult time  envisioning specific alternatives to violence to combat tyranny. The  literature of   nonviolent resistance is  filled with penetrating insights in this area.  And, while  classical liberals frequently long for alternatives to both electoral  politics and   violence, specific suggestions have been sparse. These are merely a few   gaps that the nonviolence literature may fill.  On a more aesthetic note, many of the  historical  examples of nonviolence are beautiful illustrations of the power of  voluntary   institutions to supplement or replace the role of the state.

    Finally, the role of civilian protest and direct action in recent  anti-communist   revolutions lends a new credibility to the idea of nonviolent resistance.   It would go  too far to attribute the demise of communism purely to nonviolent  resistance. But it  was one important and neglected factor in the greatest triumph of freedom  in the  twentieth-century. Classical liberals should study the lessons that it  teaches. In  particular, they should learn how freedom may be defended against  tyrannical  governments. A central lesson here is that even when the government has the  weapons, there is something that it cannot seize: the voluntary  compliance of its  citizens. Without it, maintaining power becomes costly or even   impossible. But, as  we have seen, governments almost instinctively sense this risk and strive  to  prevent it from arising. As La Boetie explains, "it has always happened  that   tyrants, in order to strengthen their power, have made every effort to   train their  people not only in obedience and servility toward themselves, but also in  adoration" (La Boetie, 75). All that is necessary to prevent tyranny is  to let the citizenry come to know its own strength. Or, in the timeless words of La  Boetie,   "From all these indignities [of tyranny], such as the very beasts of the  field would  not endure, you can deliver yourselves if you try, not by taking action,  but merely by  willing to be free. Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed.  I do not ask  that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that  you  support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus  whose  pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break into  pieces" (La  Boetie, p. 53).

    Bryan Caplan is a graduate student in Economics at Princeton University


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

     

     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    TRAITOR McCain

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    jewn McCain

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    killed 64 million Christians in Russia

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    tens of millions of dead Christians


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    millions dead in Iraq


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    serial killer of 13 Christians


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    serial killers are all jews


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    moser HATED by jews: he followed the law


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    1000 fold the child of perdition


     
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Hit Counter


    Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

    Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party


    HISTORICAL HOAX EXPOSED!
    1938: The Iconic Crying "Czech"Woman of Sudetenland
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    By Mike King 




    THE CRYING WOMAN OF SUDETENLAND


    Caption from the American National Archives:
    "The tragedy of this Sudeten woman, unable to conceal her misery as she dutifully salutes the triumphant Hitler, is the tragedy of the silent millions who have been `won over' to Hitlerism by the everlasting use of ruthless force."




    Caption From My 1982 High School History Book:
    "Woman in the Sudetenland weeping upon the annexation to Nazi Germany."
    * As a young skull full of mush, this image really made me hate Germans. 


    Caption from Historiana (EU) Website
    "This photograph shows a woman in the Czech town of Eger watching the arrival of German troops on October, 1938."


    The woman in this iconic photo is very sad. By the way, she is not "Czech." She is German. Now why would a German woman of the city of Eger (today known as Cheb) be so sad at the sight of German troops arriving to claim the city?
    The Germans of Czechoslovakia were placed under "Czechoslovakian" rule against their wishes after World War I. Shouldn't she be happy that the German "Sudetenland" is uniting with Germany? What's your problem, lady?
    Why is she really crying? Let's have a closer look at the original photo, in its entirety...
    Oh oh. Somebody is BUSTED! The "sad woman" was cut out of context so that you wouldn't see the whole picture. Evidently the more sensitive type, she is crying TEARS OF JOY! (very common among happy German women at the time) at the sight of liberating German troops. Had the photo included the reverent woman in the center, and the euphoric woman on the left, we would have figured that out. That's why the newspapers of yesterday and the history books of today cut the other two ladies out.
    "Fake History is the Fake News that has passed into the rearview mirror."
    -- Mike King

























    USA ZIONIST JEWISH BANK GANGSTERS BOUGHT PALESTINE FROM BRITISH JEWISH MAFIA


    JUDAIC ZIONIST ANTI-CHRISTIAN AND ANTI-MUSLIM WAR OF 1914

    Benjamin Freedman's 1961 Speech at the Willard Hotel (Complete)

     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.

    17.6K subscribers

    Benjamin H. Freedman's excellent speech on how World War One (and Two) really started and why the U.S. was eventually drawn in. Saved from Google Video. 
    Transcript and Additional Info: http://mail.blockyourid.com/~gbpprorg...
    105 years later, decadent Chistians and decadent Muslims have still not learned the lesson with, on the one side, Christians overwhelmingly joining forces with the Judaics against the whole world, including Christ himself, and specifically against Muslims, Arabs and Islam, and on the other side, Muslims dogmatics, fanatics, traitors, hypocrites, cowards, ignoramuses, and selfish materialists, tribalist and sectarian collaborators overwhelmingly joining forces with 'their' (our) own enemies and voting for or not opposing a system of KUFR, Coverers of the Truth - Satan himself!
    And, with Hindu, Buddhist and Atheist collaboration!
    So, it is not about blaming the Judaic mafia, but about our own decadence!
     

     FROM:
    http://tomatobubble.com/1917_a_bad_year.html

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    http://www.zahlenparty.de/wp-content/uploads/1917.jpg


    1917: A VERY BAD YEAR
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    By Mike King

    A wealthy New Yorker named Benjamin Freedman, a former aide to Bernard Baruch, later split with his fellow Jewish millionaires and "blew the whistle" on The Balfour Declaration and Zionist treachery in general. Freedman, from a 1961 speech at the Willard Hotel in Washington:
    "Let me show what happened while we were all asleep.  .....
    World War I broke out in the summer of 1914.  ...  There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. What happened?
    Within two years Germany had won that war:  not alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week's food supply  facing her -- and after that, starvation.  
    At that time, the French army had mutinied.  They lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme.  The Russian army was defecting.  They were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar.  And the Italian army had collapsed.
    Now Germany -- not a shot had been fired on the German soil.  Not an enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany.  And yet, here was Germany offering England peace terms.  They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: “Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started.”   
    Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously!   They had no choice.  It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.
    While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because this is a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make  if anyone here is curious, or doesn't believe what I'm saying is at all possible -- the Zionists in London went to the British war cabinet and they said: “Look here.  You can yet win this war.  You don't have to give up.  You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany.  You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally.”
    The United States was not in the war at that time.  We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful.  They [Zionists] told England: “We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war.”
    In other words, they made this deal:  “We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay us  is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.”
    Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever.   It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain -- that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine -- should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war.
    However, they made that promise, in October of 1916.  And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro-German -- totally pro-German -- because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews, and they were pro-German because their people, in the majority of cases came from Germany, and they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar.
    The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war.  So the German bankers -- the German-Jews -- Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar.   They stood aside and they said: “As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!”  But they poured money into Germany, they fought with Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.
    Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, they went to England and they made this deal.  At that time, everything changed, like the traffic light that changes from red to green.  Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good.   They were villains.   They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses.  They were cutting off babies' hands.  And they were no good.
    Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.
    The Zionists in London sent these cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis: “Go to work on President Wilson.  We're getting from England what we want.  Now you go to work, and you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." And that did happen. That's how the United States got into the war.  We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room.
    Now the war -- World War One -- in which the United States participated had absolutely no reason to be our war. We went in there -- we were railroaded into it -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine.   Now, that is something that the people  in the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War One. Now, what happened?
    After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: “Well, we performed our part of the agreement.  Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war.”   Because they didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years.   So they started to work out a receipt.   The receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about.   And that was called the Balfour Declaration.
    The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war.   So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill.   And I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that."
    http://tomatobubble.com/1917_a_bad_year.html

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zHIQm5NIS4

     Benjamin H Freedman speech 1961
    2,756 views
    30 Jun 2018
     

    GENOCIDAL WARS ON NATIVES WORLDWIDE, RUSSIANS, ARABS, ASIANS, AFRICANS, AMERICANS, AND GERMANS.

    THE ZIONIST JUDAIC JOKE ABOUT THEIR INNOCENCE FOR ETERNITY!

    FORMER JEW Benjamin H. Freedman speech 1961

     Benjamin H. Freedman

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxZKtX-PEvY

    Michael Hoffman & Texe Marrs Part 1 Judaism Discovered

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ENIivsnflg

     Michael Hoffman & Texe Marrs Part 2 Dark Secrets Of The Talmud

     

    Hoffman Michael. Overcoming Holo-Speak.

    [REMOVED FROM YOUTUBE???]

     THE RUSSIAN/CENTRAL ASIAN AND GERMAN DOUBLE HOLOCAUSTS WERE ALL ORCHESTRATED BY WARMONGERING JUDAICS, COMMUNISTS, SOCIALISTS, WESTERN ZIONIST CHRISTIANS AND ATHEISTS!

      TO THOSE WHO CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH AND THEY ARE VERY FEW



    "YISRAEL – GOD CONTENDED, FOUGHT, WRESTLED, AND LOST! And, that defeated God blessed him! WOW!"

    IT WAS WRITTEN, SO SOME SAID, IN GENESIS 32
    Male and female slave owner, cattle, donkeys, sheep and goats herder YACOV was looking for favours as a SERVANT in the eyes of his Lord and brother ESAU. But, he was told ESAU was instead coming to attack him and his tribe from the Land of Seir in Edom with 400 men – to kill him, his women and children! (Esau lived in another land and had never met his brother Yakov’s wives or children!) So, he cried out to God to save him from the hand of his brother Esau.

    But, not trusting his God would save him, he decided to cowardly stay behind and send a colossal bribe to his brother: “two hundred female goats and twenty male goats, two hundred ewes and twenty rams, 15 thirty female camels with their young, forty cows and ten bulls, and twenty female donkeys and ten male donkeys.”

    That night YAKOV got up and took his two wives, his two female servants and his eleven sons and crossed the ford of the Jabbok. 23 After he had sent them across the stream, he sent over all his possessions. He was alone when he started wrestling, fighting, contending with a man who prevented him from crossing the river. And he won the fight. That man was GOD! Because he defeated God, God told him that from now on his name would be ‘ISRA EL or ISRA’IL in Arabic, meaning POWERFUL AGAINST GOD! EL was an Arab God that Israel was worshipping as well as the Palestinian God ADONIS or ADONAÏ!

    When YAKOV finally met with Esau, he bowed to the ground seven times as he approached his brother who ran to him and embraced him, threw his arms around his neck, and kissed him. And they both wept. But, Esau kept the bribe although he did not want it!

    Later, YACOV or JACOB or ISRAEL would steal ESAU’s first-born birth right from a dying and stupid Isaac, allegedly! WOW! THIEVING ISRAEL!

    The belief in One God, Life after Death, Judgement Day, and Paradise were all concepts held by the Egyptians long before the HIBIRUS (Hebrews) appeared on the scene as bandits from Mesopotamia inhabited also by North Arabians. These concepts were held by Persians as well as "Indo-Aryans" (and most probably by others) before everything got mixed up, messed up and corrupted later by everybody, and more specifically by the racist tribe of YAKOV or ‘ISRA EL or YISRAEL – GOD CONTENDED, FOUGHT, WRESTLED, AND LOST! And, that defeated God blessed him! WOW!

    Through the Hitleress Saraï or Matriarch Sarah, the HIBIRUS had already stolen the birthright, according to their own Holy Book, of ABRAM’S or AVRAM’s or ABRAHAM’s first-born son ISHMAEL, and the cowardly Patriarch, cowing down to his over-aged wife Sarah, allowed this to happen! (It is obvious that all these accounts are fables, myths, legends and outright lies, including the Order the Human Sacrificing God gave to Abraham to holocaust his ONLY SON (who was at the time Ishmael, not Isaac!) And, the stupid father complied, proving that his religion was indeed one offering human sacrifices and holocausts to his bloodthirsty God (Moloch, maybe!)! Who will believe such shit from any God?

    Christians and Muslims later foolishly adopted the concepts of
    LIFE AFTER DEATH,
    THE JUDGEMENT DAY,
    PARADISE, and
    HELL, not understanding that Arabs and others were masters of poetry and very often used METAPHORS to convey ideas and messages. Taken as metaphors, all this makes sense as they force Believers to enjoin the GOOD and forbid EVIL during their earthly lives! At least, this is the way I UNDERSTAND IT!
    I even go further and say that even GOD IS A METAPHOR, which does not mean that HE DOES NOT EXIST or that I deny there is a SUPREME INTELLIGENCE who is behind the CREATION of everything we see and do not see!

    This short exposé proves one thing beyond any doubt: ISRAEL WAS JUST A TRIBE LIVING IN THE MIDDLE EAST!
    BAFS
    Monday 21st of October 2019

    P.S. Feel free to correct any mistake I have made! I am writing while looking after my two grandchildren!
    The extremely few (outside the Secret Services) who read chunks of what I write are scared when they see my 1727 Oxford Bible containing 81 books authorised by “their Majesties” of England.
    😂🤪😭😇😍

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for Hindenburg headline
    THE JEWISH WAR ON GERMAN ZEPPELINS

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    By Mike King

    A Zeppelin airship takes its name from German Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin -- a German General and inventor whose company -- Luftschiffbau Zeppelin (LZ)--led the development of the rigid flying machines in the late 1800's / early 1900's. After the great success of Zeppelin's design, the word "zeppelin" became used to refer to all rigid airships.

    Zeppelins were first flown commercially in 1910 byDeutsche Luftschiffahrts-AG (DELAG) -- essentially the world's first airline service. By the outbreak of World War I in 1914, DELAG had made more than 1,500 flights. During the war, the German military made use of Zeppelins for bombing and scouting.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Bildnis Ferdinand von Zeppelin.png
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    1. Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin (1838-1917) 
    // 2. 1900: The first flight of the 420-feet-long"LZ 1" (shown above a large boat) 
    // 3. By 1910, DELAG was flying the Zeppelins (now over 700-feet long) commercially.

    The defeat of Germany in 1918 (engineered by Jewish Marxists at home and Jewish Globalists & Zionists from the outside) slowed down DELAG's business substantially. In 1919, DELAG's airships were surrendered under the terms of the vicious Treaty of Versailles which had been imposed upon a disarmed Germany. The treaty also prohibited the Germans from building more airships. An exception was made to allow for the construction of a single airship for the US Navy -- a transaction which spared DELAG from total extinction and bought the company some more time.
    In 1926 the restrictions on airship construction were lifted at a time when some of the oppressive monetary reparations of the Versailles Treaty were restructured. Work was then started on the construction of the airship, Graf Zeppelin (775 feet) -- named after the Count. The company was revived and, during the 1930s, the airships Graf Zeppelin and the larger Hindenburg(803-feet) operated regular transatlantic flights from Germany to North America and Brazil.
    To enhance revenue, the zeppelins carried transatlantic mail from the United States to Europe. Special postage stamps were minted and sold for this purpose -- but the practice was suddenly discontinued (by the U.S.) and the unsold zeppelin stamps were destroyed by the Post Office (a most unusual act which enraged many stamp collectors (here)) Although neither Hitler nor FDR were in power in 1930, could the sudden discontinuation and strange destruction of the stamps have been the result of a general hatred of Germans held by some people (cough cough) already embedded within the federal bureaucracy? Probably.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    The rarest and most expensive of the 1930 Graf Zeppelin stamps.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    This letter's three Graf Zeppelin stamps let it travel across the ocean twice.
    1. In 1919, the Allies ruined Germany at Versailles --- not only seizing land, money, colonies, people and resources from innocent Germany, but also banning its amazing airships. 
     // 2 & 3. DELAG managed to hang on until the ban was lifted in 1926. In 1930, the U.S. Postal Service issued special air-mail stamps for letters shipped to Europe aboard the Graf Zeppelin -- but suddenly discontinued the service and destroyed the remaining stamps which could still have been sold to collectors.

    The spire of the Empire State Building was originally designed to serve as a mooring mast for the jaw-dropping 750-foot-long marvels of German engineering. But it was found that high winds associated with such high-altitude moorings made the Manhattan mooring idea too impractical. The airships did pass over Jew York during the 1930's. After 1933, the zeppelins came with Hitler's Swastika flag on the tail as street-level onlookers gave the "Sieg Heil" salute. "Oy vey!"-- the "usual suspects" -- who had already, in 1933, "declared war" upon Germany -- must surely have shrieked.
    The legendary Hindenburg disaster of 1937, which occurred right here in New Jersey, along with, shall we say, "geo-political" issues (cough cough) eventually brought about the demise of Zeppelins -- structures which had been the great pride of Germany -- both before and during the righteous reign of The Great One (that's Hitler for all you newbies * normies).
    The preceding account is pretty much standard knowledge. But there is a little bit more to the story that (((they))) don't want you to know about.


    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for Hindenburg above new york
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for Hindenburg headline
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for new yorkers salute the hindenburg
    1. Swastikas flying over New York drove (((them))) crazy! 
    // 2. 1937: The horrible explosion and crash was broadcast live via radio, and then shown on pre-TV news reels (generally seen by movie-goers before the show starts) 
    // 3. Hard to imagine -- given what was to come in a few years -- that Americans saluted the flag-draped coffins of the fallen Germans.
     *
     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for hindenburg interior
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for hindenburg interior
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for hindenburg interior
    1. The Hindenburg was a massive structure and engineering marvel, but passenger space was limited. // 2 & 3. The dining room offered spectacular views, slow moving views.

    Begun in 1932 and finally launched in 1936, the Hindenburg Airship -- named after Paul von Hindenburg -- measured an astounding 803 feet -- but its beautiful interior could only accommodate about 100 people, a number which includes the well-to-do passengers and crew. General Hindenburg, we should note, was the respected World War I general and later president of Germany who -- in order to break the contentious multi-party gridlock that was crippling Germany -- named Hitler as Chancellor in 1933.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for hindenburg AND HITLER POSTER
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    1. Hindenburg had died in 1934, at age 87 -- but the zeppelin bearing his name immortalized him. The Jews and Communists HATED Hindenburg for enabling Hitler's rise in 1933. 
    // 2. A 1933 KPD (German Communist Party) poster blares: "An End to This System," and depicts an ominous Red threat aimed at Hitler and Hindenburg (in pointy military helmet).
    *
    Prior zeppelins had always been designed to stay float using helium -- a gas which is not flammable. At the time, however, helium was only available in industrial quantities from plants in the United States. Despite a U.S. ban on the export of helium under the Helium Control Act of 1927, the Germans designed the Hindenburg to use helium in the belief that the US government would license its export. But that assumption was made before FDR and his Jewish-Marxist gang took over America in 1933.

    Some important background context....
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Related image
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for judea declares war on germany
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    465.jpg
    1. Jewish pressure to destroy Germany began years before the actual second world war started. 
    // 2. 1933. Daily Express (London): "Judea Declares War on Germany."  
    // 3. 1933 / NY Daily News 


    When the designers learned that FDR's administration would not allow helium to be shipped to "Nazi" Germany, the Hindenberg was re-engineered to use hydrogen for its lift instead -- a gas which is flammable. The man responsible for denying helium to Germany was Secretary of the Interior Harold Ickes (cough cough) -- a fanatical German-hater and FDR Marxist. Though the German engineering geniuses were still able to construct a very safe airship -- because hydrogen was flammable -- there now existed an opportunity for an "accident" with a plausible "explanation" for it.
    On May 6, 1937, at the very moment that the Hindenburg was docking before an awed crowd at Lakehurst, NJ, the grand airship burst into flames and crashed, killing 35 of the 97 passengers & crew. "Static electricity" was blamed, yet the Hindenburg had previously endured direct lightning hits! The true cause of the explosion remains unknown to this day. But the unusual amount of news reel cameras present that day, the helium embargo, the timing of the mysterious ignition just as the ship was mooring, the hyping of the idiotic "static electricity" theory, and the anti-German hysteria being whipped up by the press all combine to suggest that the Hindenburg disaster was actually an act of sabotage. Theories ranged from an on-board fanatic-bomber to an incendiary rifle-bullet fired from the nearby woods. The incident shattered confidence in Germany's zeppelins and marked the end of the airship era. How conveeenient.
       
     Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for hindenburg mooring
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for Harold Ickes
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    Image result for Harold Ickes with FDR

    1. A suspicious blast -- at the exact moment of mooring with the cameras filming -- destroys Germany's Airship industry. 
    // 2. It was FDR's Jewish  Secretary of the Interior, Harold Ickes, who would not permit helium exports to Germany. 
    // 3. FDR with the mighty Ickes.



    The Controversial Zeppelin Stamps That Enraged 1930s Collectors

    The U.S. Post Office ended up destroying most of them.

    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    The rarest and most expensive of the 1930 Graf Zeppelin stamps.

    The rarest and most expensive of the 1930 Graf Zeppelin stamps. U.S. Post Office/Public Domain

    On May 21, 1930, the world’s biggest airship, the Graf Zeppelin, floated over the Cape Verde Islands and slowed down over an unusual target: the Porto Praia post office. When the ship had maneuvered to just the right spot, its crew threw something out of the gondola, attached to a small parachute. As frightened crowds gathered below to watch, the mysterious object fluttered down from the sky and landed right on the building’s roof. It was a big sack of mail.
    Over the next few weeks, the Graf Zeppelin would complete its first Pan-American tour, flying to Rio de Janeiro, Ohio, and New Jersey, and then back over the Atlantic to Spain and its home country, Germany. Although much glitz and glamour accompanied the airship’s comings and goings, its journey was funded by something more mundane: those sacks of mail, via the stamps affixed to the letters inside.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    The Graf Zeppelin itself, flying over Brazil during its 1930 Pan-American Tour.
    The Graf Zeppelin itself, flying over Brazil during its 1930 Pan-American Tour. Desconhecido/Public Domain
    At 775 feet from nose to tail—about as long as the Golden Gate Bridge is tall—the Graf was the largest flying machine the world had ever seen. Its operating costs were proportionate, clocking at about $4 per mile (or $54 per mile in today’s money). Although passengers paid steep ticket prices, especially on early flights, the ship could only hold about 20 of them at a time, limiting that revenue stream. And despite the fanfare that greeted its every move, attempts to charge admission to view it on the ground didn’t go over well with the public, who were generally hurting from the Great Depression, and who wanted their close-ups for free.
    Instead, the Graf’s parent company, German Zeppelin Airship Works, decided to recoup costs by commissioning special stamps from the countries on the tour route. Only letters with these stamps on them would be accepted onto the airship, which would then deliver them to their destinations. This was the only commercial transatlantic air mail option available at the time, and was days faster than sending a letter by boat. Brazil, Bolivia, Germany, and Spain all made the Zeppelin stamps, and 93 percent of the proceeds from each stamp was funneled back into German Zeppelin Airship Works.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    At 65 cents, the green Graf Zeppelin stamp was the least expensive.
    At 65 cents, the green Graf Zeppelin stamp was the least expensive. U.S. Post Office/Public Domain
    After some debate, the U.S. Post Office decided to get in on the game as well, designing and printing a run of Graf Zeppelin stamps in a matter of weeks. They called this a gesture of goodwill toward Germany, and pledged to also contribute 93 percent of the revenue to the Airship Works. Secretly, though, they expected that an enthusiastic population of American collectors would snap up most of the stamps, keeping them out of circulation, and ensuring that the Post Office held onto most of the money.
    So on April 19, 1930, the USPO issued three stamps, each with a different design and for a particular amount. The first, a 65-cent stamp, was green, and showed the Graf cruising eastward above the sea. This stamp would get a postcard over the ocean once, from the U.S. or Brazil to Spain or Germany. The second, a $1.30 stamp, was brown, and featured the zeppelin heading west over a cropped map of the world labeled with the tour’s three main cities (although New York, here, stands in for New Jersey). That one would get a letter across the sea.
    Image may be NSFW.
    Clik here to view.
    This letter's three Graf Zeppelin stamps let it travel across the ocean twice.
    This letter’s three Graf Zeppelin stamps let it travel across the ocean twice. U.S. Post Office/Public Domain
    The last stamp, in a bright sky blue, cost $2.60, and displayed the Graf high in the clouds, superimposed over a small globe. This one was more fun than practical—it would get your letter round-trip, over to Europe and then back again. (One young boy from Ontario sent himself a letter this way, and made the papers.) The stamps’ release was trumpeted in newspapers from New York City to Santa Cruz.
    The joke, though, was on the post office. The economic hardship that led so many Depression-era Americans to be buoyed by the sight of a massive airship also made it difficult for any of them to pay $4.55—50 times the cost of a loaf of bread—for a set of three collectible stamps. The U.S. printed 1,000,000 of each color, but only sold about 227,000 zeppelin stamps total, most of which actually did end up on mail delivered by the Graf.
    The Post Office eventually destroyed the remainder of the stamps, making collectors, who quickly accused them of creating artificial scarcity, even angrier. But that’s what happens when you try to cross the world’s biggest zeppelin.
    Stamp of Approval is an occasional column that explores the designs and backstories of the world’s strangest stamps. Have a stamp you want investigated? Stick it in an email to cara@atlasobscura.com.


    Viewing all 760 articles
    Browse latest View live